Skip to main content

tv   Hannity  FOX News  May 20, 2024 6:00pm-7:00pm PDT

6:00 pm
trendy. >> take care of each other. >> stay strong. >> lean on me, when you are not strong! and i'll be your friend. >> take at all in, because it keeps going faster as you get older. >> and free palestine! >> wait, what. >> got you. >> should jesse watters be a commencement speaker? >> what has he done? >> he fought the war on christmas. he wrote the a book. >> jesse: we didn't have time for my morgan wallen concert review. maybe tomorrow. shorthanded, he is next, and always remember, i am watters and this is my world. [ ♪♪ ] [ ♪♪ ] >> welcome to hannity.
6:01 pm
what a day in court, we will get to that in a minute. and joe biden's promise to restore the soul america is more laughable than ever. screaming and yelling at college graduates in one of the most divisive speeches given by u.s. presidents. >> president joe biden: what is democracy. a trail of broken promises leaving black people behind. >> robert kkk's best friend, a mentor. we will call out the lies, the smears, the hatred. we will play out a moment where joey seemed to believe he was vice president during the beginning of the pandemic, covid19, and that obama sent him to detroit to solve the problem. also tonight, a tutorial on how every republican needs to handle
6:02 pm
the hostal media mob in an interview. >> will you accept the election results? >> hilary clinton said that the election was stolen from her. and trump was illegitimate. but democrats say they will not certify 2024. because of the insure squex. we begin tonight in york city. fireworks big time in the courtroom. another explosive day in the testimony of the kangaroo court. just hours ago, prosecutors rested their case against former president trump without proving a thing. but not without eye opening testimony from the state's so-called star witness, michael cohen. he is not only a liar, also a thief. now cohen was completely gutted once again, by defence on cross-examination. and today, he admitted on the stand he stole tens of thousands
6:03 pm
of dollars from the trump organization. well for a guy like trump that paid close attention, how would that happen. according to a cnn analyst, this is a more serious crime than what donald trump is on trial for, and guess what, that new york da brag, he knew all about it. but the last name is not trump. he hates trump. the media mob is forced to admit that the political witch hunt is imploding take a look. >> i am reeling from the fact that he stole money from the trump organization and the prosecution didn't get it out earlier. >> the prosecution painted michael cohen as this bumbling pathetic character that his sins were misguided loyalty to trump. but now you see something different. there is an argument to be made, that he is an opportunic thief.
6:04 pm
>> the fact that he was never charged with larceny is important. stealing $60,000 through fraud, which would be larceny in new york state, is more serious of a crime than falsifying business records. >> they minimized it. and the prosecutor misled this jury. >> are you allowed to say that? >> oh, yeah. >> even fake jake didn't give a left-winged opinion. still defending michael cohen, are you shocked, i am not. take a look. >> he very effectively got michael cohen to agree that yes, he stole $30,000. later when cohen was asked about that upon redirect by the prosecution, it didn't really sound like stealing $30,000. it sounded like michael cohen doing the little that he could within that calculation to rebalance the bonus he thought he deserved and it still came
6:05 pm
out as less than the bonus he thought he deserved and the bonus he got the year before. >> let's compare to the actual transcript, trump's lawyer asked "you stole from the trump organization, right?" cohen responded "yes, sir." you don't have to be a legal scholar, now do you. but i am pretty sure that means cohen admitted to stealing from the trump organization. but don't expect charges from brag. he is only interested in getting trump as he made a promise on the campaign trail. but unfortunately for brag, his star witness is a complete unmitigated disaster. cohen said he had a final interest in the case. can't make that up either. he says he is trying to get a reality tv show picked up and might use this trial as a way to run for congress, according to testimony. he has made millions on the antitrump hatred through book deals, podcasts and whatever gifts he is getting on social
6:06 pm
media. and in order to salvage this train wreck, the prosecution at this late hour, they will need a lot of help. but lucky for them, they have their judge, a compromised biden donor who is blatantly, abusively against all things donald trump. as trump's defence presents their case, well the judge appeared ready, willing and able to give brag a helping hand. he knows probably deep in his heart this is falling apart and he is trying to salvage the failing trial. judge merchant exploded on bob costello while trying to limit the scope of his testimony. even threatened to remove him from the courtroom for rolling his eyes and questioned "are you staring me down?" really. as a reminder, the defence called on costello, why? because of this compelling story. take a look. >> basically, they only put in a
6:07 pm
small cherry picked group of emails, i presented maybe two to 300 emails and text messages to them. i had them with me luckily. they put two or three into evidence. i said, are you going to put the rest into evidence, and they said no. he said, specifically, and i cross-examined him on this. this was my idea. it was his idea to take care of the nda because he was contacted by a lawyer for stormi daniels who said she was going to claim that donald trump had sex with her. cohen said i didn't believe the allegation but nevertheless it would be embarrassing to milania, that's michael cohen's words so i decided to take care of this myself. >> jesse: according to testimony, well apparently the story was told to many people in the media mob. here is eric trump, he was in the courtroom today. here is his quote.
6:08 pm
the judge's treatment of bob costello was disgraceful. he was not allowed to tell his story, because it would be devastating and end this sham trial. this is not justice. he is correct. he let stormi daniel talk about ghosts and x mated stories, irrelevant to the case but the moment that rob costello talks about his interactions with michael cohen, their star witness and impeach his testimony, in regards to the nda and him saying over and over again that he did it on his own, well, the judge sought to limit costello's testimony, and threaten to kick him out of court. the judge also put strict limitations on another witness that is going to be used by the defence, bradley smith, the former fec commissioner and an expert on federal election crimes. now keep in mind, a critical
6:09 pm
part of the prosecution's case, against trump it is nebulous. this is a crime theory. he was never charged in any way shape, matter or form. neither identified, but he is prohibited bradley smith in testifying about the law, in a court of law, based on the legal statute in the law, is this not banana republic, kangaroo court stuff, it is obvious what the judge is doing. here is bradley smith on this very program. recently, taking a look. >> the claim made by the da, the federal law says something is a campaign contribution if it is made for the purposes of influencing a campaign. and that's the argument. well they were trying to do this because they thought if they could pay hush money to stormi daniels, they would do that. most of us would not think this is a campaign expenditure to try to settle a potential legal
6:10 pm
claim against you or other claims against you for events that occurred 10 years before you talked about running for office. to pay hush money to stormi daniels or anyone else. and the theory of the da brag is that not only could they be paid with campaign funds, they would have to be paid with campaign funds. when you look at the statute and realize that is an objective standard it is not correct to say that these were funds that count as a campaign expenditure. >> between costello and smith, it would be game over for brag. so they are limiting donald trump's defence in a court of law and throw a lifeline, what to brag, why? because he is trying to say this case has gone down the tubes. this is what the weaponization of it looks like. it is law fare, plain and simple.
6:11 pm
even oliver stone is calling this the new form of warfare, l lawfare. this entire case hinges on uncorroborated claims from a convicted liar and apparently thief who hates donald trump by admission. who himself would benefit from trump's conviction, and even testified that he hold multiple people that trump knew nothing about the payment deal to stormi daniels and with held evidence from the jury, brag did, after it was specifically pointed out to him by costello. no wonder that the judge came down on costello. he is blocking real evidence. both oaf the antitrump democrats are out of control. this is a political show trial.
6:12 pm
it is destroying the credibility of our entire justice system. and it is shredding our sacred constitution. in the process causing great damage to your constitutional republic. now with reaction, here is eric trump. he was in the courtroom today. i am sure there is a lot you have to say. i won't even ask a question. but you were there. you want to describe to people what actually happened in there? because the media was kicked out, and the courtroom was emptied. >> yeah. >> jesse: but you were there. >> shaun, i have not seen anything like this. i have been by my father's side almost the entire time. and i have never seen anything like i saw today. you think that transparency would be important to get to the truth. that's normally what you do in court. and the exact opposite thing happened today. something is holding the judge back. and i think i know what it is. his daughter who is making millions and millions of
6:13 pm
dollars, raising money for democratic operatives in new york, because michael cohen, their star witness has lied over and over again. he lied to congress, senate, the attorney general of new york, he lied in the da trial in new york. he lied in the southern district of new york, he lied to his wife. he lied to judge paulsy, the judge that sentenced him. he paid vendors in bags of cash. he stole from our organization. right? so we asked the judge for a motion to dismiss after all these lies, after michael agreed he lied to all of these people. he is a serial liar, he can't be trusted and he is the star witness. we asked for a motion to dismiss and it goes nowhere because body is holding -- somebody is holding this judge back. bob costello wanted to tell his stories. he met with cohen, he knows the details of this. he said over and over again that cohen said that trump did
6:14 pm
nothing wrong. he has no information on donald trump. he did nothing illegal. and at every single chance that he could -- you know, he could stop him, he could sustain -- he would block him from any of that testimony. then as you said before, the top fec lawyer in the country wants to testify about how there is no crime here. and again he won't allow the fec lawyer, transparency should be at the heart of this case. and the judge is blocking it at every single intersection, and i sit there, as a proud son, as a person that knows my father didn't do a dam thing wrong, you watch a sham in the kangaroo court, where my father has been censored and held off the campaign trail. how much more does a person need to go through, and how much more obvious can this be to every single american, exactly what is happening right now because my father, that man on the stage is
6:15 pm
winning in every single swing state. he is mopping the floor with biden right now. about to have one of the biggest rallies in new york history. you saw what happened in jersey last week. they can't handle it, so they won't let him out of this case, even though it would have ended day one for any other person that didn't have the last name trump. >> this has gotten worse and worse. what i see happening, and tell me if this is your observation, looking at the impeccable credentials of someone like bob costello or bradley smith who we just played, and i just think this is a biden donor judge. you brought up -- you know it has been written up extensively about the daughter and the political activities and questions if she benefits as a result of this trial. he should have recused himself, the statute of limitations have
6:16 pm
run out. no one can either identify -- you couldn't even know what the crime is. because it doesn't exist. and this is now -- this is the country we are living in. i think it is back firing, and as hard as it is for you and your family and your father, the fact that they are -- he is desperately trying to throw them a lifeline says he knows that they lost. >> let me put it in context, shaun. and the whole tactic is to embarrass and fuse people. but this is $130,000 from 8 years ago and they have charged my father with 34 felony counts. right? while they shut down all of new york. they shut down the fdr drive on the way down. they surround the courthouse with the biggest law enforcement presence you have ever seen. they close the fdr on the way up town. you have every single da in new york, they are all stiting there
6:17 pm
and giggling. the resources, the years of time they have spent on this for $130,000 from 8 years ago, for an accountant that booked a legal expense, a long time personal attorney as a legal expense, no one believes it as little kids are getting shot in new york, and women are getting hurt, and illegal immigrant are taking over the city and you can't shop at cvs because everything is behind plexiglass because of the shop lifting, no one believes this. this is what they have been doing since he came down the escalator. they are out to get the guy. brag will stop at nothing. and soros is saying, you take down trump otherwise we will have a problem on november 5th and the whole country is seeing it. the fundraising is off the charts because of it. he is winning in the polling because of it. something like this bites hem in
6:18 pm
the butt and that's what is happening right there. but it is a shame that he has to sit through this nonsense. he is a great president, a great person, a great father and the country deserves better than this nonsense. >> jesse: i am going to agree with that last part. the country deserves so much better. and it is sad. eric, thank you. joining us with more, also in the courtroom today, trump legal spokesperson, i want to get your perspective watching this adam shift show unfolding today? >> that's a great way to refer to it, shaun. it is a show. it is a biden show trial. that's for sure. if you look at the audience and the lack of evidence and you look at how they are literally floundering because they have no case and it is coming out. you know there was something that occurred to me today and i was speaking to some people and i am sitting there listening to this, and i think the american people need to remember something, shaun, we just wrapped up a fraud case with
6:19 pm
latisha james about books and records, about statements of financial condition under valued. and here we are, and they have taken the same issue and tried to stack a civil issue for $130,000 with 34 counts -- what would normally be a misdemeanor, but under brag, 51 don't get charged and they are calling this a federal crime because they are desperate. let's not forget what this is. this is the same trial i just finished. the same state i just finished and we were demolished by crooked judges and this is what we are doing again. it is desperate and it is obvious. and the rulings today, shaun, as i spoke to you on the radio, i was infuriated. to not allow a expert is a fatal, fatal error in my opinion. >> the problem with the appeal is, if there is a conviction, that happens after the election. how convenient. we really appreciate it.
6:20 pm
you have been in the courtroom everyday, and i can't imagine what that is like in real life. thank you. here with more, jonathan turley, he was in the courtroom today. what was it like for you? >> well, it was like being in a parallel universe. because i didn't recognize much of it. it was particularly bizarre to watch cohen sit there on the stand and admit that he stole tens of thousands of dollars from his client, and rather matter of factually, he committed larceny. this is not the first time he has taken the stand to admit criminal acts. he admitted previously he committed perjury in a trial over his prior perjury. and the department of justice did nothing. they had a ready made case of a witness say, i swear to god, i committed perjury in the previous trial. and the department of justice
6:21 pm
shrugged and walked away. and you have someone that admitted to a major larceny case. and the judge said, you are not charged with anything, are you? and i wanted to say, that's the point! there is a guy in this courtroom which most certainly be charged and he is the star witness. >> yeah. let me ask you this. because you have been all over this case, and following every detail of this case, i think it was the first day in court. am i correct about that? >> yes. >> it was your first day. did you get a different feeling being in there. were you in the courtroom and did you see the whole disaster with costello, are you staring me down? you know his credentials. i mean they are pretty impressive. >> first of all, the most striking aspect of the day is how one sided the judge's rulings were, from the beginning of the day.
6:22 pm
i was amazed at how he routinely ruled for the prosecution. some of the rulings against the defence, i still don't understand how he got his mind around some of the rulings. they seemed completely wrong to me. when it came to costello i was not in the court when he was on the stand, but that was a really interesting decision by the defence. and i think it is partially because, that the judge is once again allowing not just the prosecutors but michael cohen to tell the jury there were campaign finance violations in the case and the judge just offers this weak instruction that you should not take that for a judgment on the law. you can ignore it. they are likely to ignore the instruction, rather than the repeated references to campaign violations. there are no violations in this case. but the jury believes there are. because the judge has allowed that to happen. so that's the reason they called
6:23 pm
costello eventually. he is a kill shot witness. they have decided they are going to put it all on the table and go for a hung jury instead of just letting this play out and have it reversed on appeal. and costello, really gave the judge a lot to handle. the one thing i would advise him, and i would reluctantly advise bob costello, i would say dial it down a little bit tomorrow. the rolling of the eyes and the comments. his testimony is golden. he has to get it out and not trip wires with this judge. because he still has a lot to tell the jury that they are going to be quite surprised to hear. >> i agree with that last question, did you get a read on the jury? >> no. because i was in the overflow, so -- >> oh, the overflow room, regular room. i am not allowed anywhere near new york. so i am fine with that. professor, thank you. when we come back, allen was in
6:24 pm
the courtroom today with donald trump. he joins us along with gregg jarret and a tu torial on how to take on the media mob in an interview. straight ahead. [ ♪♪ ] spring into savings this moving season with pods. save up to 25% now on moving and storage... and see why pods has been trusted with over 6 million moves. but don't wait, save up to 25% now. visit pods.com today.
6:25 pm
6:26 pm
6:27 pm
with absorbine pro, pain won't hold you back from your passions. it's the only solution with two max-strength anesthetics to deliver the strongest numbing pain relief available.
6:28 pm
so, do your thing like a pro, pain-free. absorbine pro. . >> i think the case is going very well. this case should be terminated. this shouldn't go anywhere. it should be terminated right now. and new york state has to build up the system again. they can't let this happen. can't let this happen. there were no crimes. we did nothing wrong. and i want to get back to campaigning. i am representing millions and millions -- hundreds of millions of people. >> sean: president trump outside the courtroom today, also today
6:29 pm
like allen and others predicted the judge pointed out that trump calling a legal expert would be allowed -- that would allow the prosecution to do the same. their testimony would conflict with his own interpretation of the law. oh, okay. so he talked about the election law experts would be severely limited in what he was able to say. the former fec chair. another insane ruling. allen was in the courtroom today. he is joining us with gregg. i don't know if john will like this. you were in the actual courtroom. you were not asked to leave. you saw this whole show go down with bob costello and the judge. you know, you trying to stare me down, what are you talking about, he rolled his eyes. i am rolling my eyes just hearing about what is going on in the courtroom. i have to imagine, in all the
6:30 pm
years you practiced law, have you seen anything like this? >> no. i never have. i sat in the front row, just feet away from where all the action occurred. i rolled my eyes when the judge made some rulings that were absurd. any first year evidence student would understand that he was making bias rulings in favour of one side. i stared him down. but costello acted like a normal witness and the judge went bazerk. he kicked the media out of the courtroom. i don't know why. i was not kicked out. and i heard him lecture costello, what you did was contempetuos. and may west, this is like that situation where they said, you
6:31 pm
are showing contempt to the court, and they said no. but the judge said he would strike the testimony and hold him in contempt if he rolled his eyes again. you have a constitutional right to roll your eyes and stare at anyone. watching him give lie after lie. would you believe that he actually said he would not have accepted a pardon from donald trump after he previously said he would do anything to avoid prison. he would essentially -- he would lie, he would cheat. anything to avoid prison. but i won't accept the pardon from donald trump. if you believe that, i have a bridge to sell you in brooklyn. there were so many lies and failure to allow a full testimony from the expert when the other side was allowed to introduce letters, saying that the jury will believe it as jonathan correctly said it, it was illegal, it was illegal. and the expert was going to
6:32 pm
rebut the that. this judge has committed more reversible errors than i have seen in years and years of practicing law. it is just an outrage. >> sean: it really is. i want to explore with you, gregg, the -- what bob costello has been saying. and that is that he spent an hour and a half on a zoom call with brag's people, and he pointed out evidence that he said needed to be presented to the grand jury, and they purposefully didn't. now in a grand jury, we hear you can indict a ham sandwich, but if a da knows about evidence, knowing that the defence has no spokesperson there, don't they have a legal obligation to present that. do you see ethical issues for the judge who should have recused in this case? >> i absolutely do.
6:33 pm
for everyone associated with this. the prosecution and -- look, the prosecutor has the affirmative duty, that if he knows about exculpatory evidence, he must, he absolutely must present it to the grand jury. why? because in a grand jury there is no defence allowed. you know, the defence attorneys tonight come in there and present their side. it is one-sided. so the duty shifts to the prosecution. here, they conjured up this phony excuse and said to costello, oh, we can't admit your exculpatory evidence because it is hear say. there is no hear say in a grand jury. even newspaper articles are submitted. so this is an example of essentially, obstruction of justice, by the people we expect to do justice. costello, today, though, i think
6:34 pm
blew away cohen's credibility. supposed him for lying to the jury and that is why the judge went ballistic. he is helping the prosecution by sustaining the meritless objections, and scolding costello. this is a transparently rigged case, engineered to convict. so donald trump has been saying over and over again, this is a corrupt case, and a crooked judge, and today, he proved it. >> sean: this should be a direct to verdict. this motion to dismiss should be granted. that's not going to happen. and without all the pertinent information because costello will impeach the testimony of the star witness. the fact that he won't allow that is unreal. the fact he won't allow a lawyer to explain the lawyer, unreal. anyway, what a day.
6:35 pm
thank you both. when we come back, senator marco rubio, all you republicans out there, watch this exchange, and learn. this is how you should handle a hostal media mob, straight ahead. [ ♪♪ ]
6:36 pm
6:37 pm
6:38 pm
6:39 pm
>> sean: during what was a contentious appearance on meet the press yesterday. senator rubio sparred over the results of the coming notify election and the potential results. watch this exchange. >> will you accept the results of 2024 no matter what happens, senator? >> no matter what happens, senator, no, if it is unfair, it will be contested.
6:40 pm
you are asking the wrong person. the democrats have opposed every republican victory since 2000. >> no democrat has refused to concede. will you accept the election results? >> the election was stolen from hilary clinton, she says. and now democrats are saying they won't certify 2024 because donald trump is ineligible to hold office. you need to ask them. >> sean: republicans before you go on the media mob, watch that interview and the previous interviews. senator rubio is correct. since 2000, democrats have denied the results of every single republican victory, for the most part. and stacey abrahams is another case. >> it is critical to understand, as i have been telling candidates who have come to see me, you can run the best campaign, you can even become
6:41 pm
the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you. >> i think he is an illegitimate president that didn't win. how do you fight against that? >> the president is an illegitimate racist, occupying the whitehouse. >> the russian weighing in on the election, the russian attempt to help the election and frankly, the fbi handling of the election, makes it illegitimate. >> it is illegitimate. and he will do it with the help of vlad, his best pal, and we will be with him for six more years and that is terrifying. >> would you be my vice president candidate? folks, look, i absolutely agree. >> we had this election back in 2018. and despite the final tally and the inauguration, and the situation we find ourselves in, i have one very affirmative statement to make, we won.
6:42 pm
and i believe it was a stolen election, and i am not saying they stole it from me, they stole it from the voters of georgia. >> sean: you can add barack obama, and more. i just don't have time. but senator mark rubio is here with reaction. republicans don't go in prepared. and it is a hostile environment. the days of brinkly and ruster, they are long gone. and people aren't even watching those sunday shows like they used to. and i just love the fact, when you go on, you don't take their crap. >> well, i mean, the premesis is something that needs to be challenged. most people have forgotten they did all of that. it is not widely reported and there was not a string of repeated interviews. but we need to understand what is happening this moment.
6:43 pm
there are democrats right now toying with the idea that there was a piece in the atlantic, there were people that didn't comment on it. some are toying with the whole notion that if trump wins, they will refuse to certify, because they will say he is an insurre insurrectionists. they are already talking about that. so i think it is important to point out, they should be the ones that are asked. if i am not mistaken, i would say 12, maybe 13 democrats have appeared on meet the press in the last year under this host. not a single one of them has been asked the question of whether they will accept the election if trump win, no matter what. they are not asked that question. they need to be asked that question, because at the outset, they have challenged and disputed the credibility and the legitimatesy of every republican presidential win since 2000. >> sean: and again, we didn't include obama, or jeffrys, or bill clinton and they have done the same thing too.
6:44 pm
they are election deniers. but you are right. the media never asks that question. just like, the january 6th committee. you have five people that are on record saying that donald trump approved 10,000 national guard troupes. and it was bowser that denied it in writing. you have the capital police chief begging for guard troupes. they didn't want to bring him in. they said that donald trump said peacefully patriotically march to the capital so your voices are heard. all of this is distorted. now we are in the middle of this trial. what is your reaction to this and what is happening with the weaponization of the doj. >> the trial is a national embarrassment. the whole world is wondering what has happened to america. america put sanctions on countries that did this thing.
6:45 pm
michael cohen ask s like the freido character in godfather. he feels like others are more impressive. he wants to have something of his own, and he betrays his family. and this is michael cohen. all the people he used to work with with the trump organization are in the whitehouse and he was left out. and he is miserable about that. he is desperate to see what he can invent on his own to impress donald trump and get himself back in. that is what is coming across here. not to mention that he is an admitted, convicted serial liar that stole money from the trump organization, again, to be able to go back and take credit for having achieved something and done something on his own without anyone telling him to do it. this whole thing is a disaster. if i told someone that the leading candidate for president, for republican or democrats, would be standing trial in a
6:46 pm
courtroom, in which a judge who was an open biden supporter, a prosecutor who is an open biden supporter and a jury with the most liberal community in america has completely ridiculous charges. >> sean: and cohen admitted today. >> he has to have the last name trump. that's the only person that would have been charged with this. >> sean: he admitted today, that he did this on his own. you think that would be big news. >> and then he has the financial stake on the trial, that he is going to make money off the trial. >> sean: that too. your name is coming up a lot as it relates to vice president. if asked, would you -- would you -- what would your answer be? >> well let me be clear. i have never talked about this with the trump campaign or president trump. i have only heard it from the media. i want to serve our country. that would be a tremendous honour. but that's donald trump's
6:47 pm
decision to make. he is going to make a good decision. and he has good people to pick from. we will see what happens. he will make the right choice. i want to serve, whether in the senate or some other capacity. but i have not talked to anyone about it. he has a lot of good people to pick from. >> sean: i hope republicans learn how to handle the left wing media mob. thank you. you are not going to believe the remarks with joe biden yesterday in a commencement address. we will play them and reaction. that's straight ahead. [ ♪♪ ]
6:48 pm
6:49 pm
6:50 pm
6:51 pm
>> sean: so joe biden delivered the commencement speech this weekend at college where his desperate attempt now, to appeal to african american voters failed miserably.
6:52 pm
instead, it came off as race baiting and frankly, no one cared that joe was there. take a look at joe's patronizing remarks. >> president joe biden: what is democracy? the trail of broken promises still leave black communities behind. what is democracy? if you have to be ten times better than anyone else to get a fair shot. and most of all, what does it mean, as you have heard before, to be a black man who loves his country, even if it doesn't love him back in equal measure. they don't see you in the future of america. but they are wrong. extremist forces aligned against morehouse, and they peddled a fiction, a character about what being a man is about, tough talk, abusing power, bigstry. >> sean: he met with anti-israel
6:53 pm
protesters who turned their back on the president when he spoke, and a larger demonstration happening outside the commencement ceremony, calling him genocide joe. very few people cared that he was there. here is reaction, a former presidential candidate. your reaction to all of this, and i brought this up with tim scott this week. i think i am the only one that does. he partnered with his mentor and his friend, that fill bustered the act in 64, and he stood against integration of school buses in the 70's, why he didn't want them to be racial jungles. >> he did that because it was politically popular to say that back then, like it is politically popular for race baiting now with the far left. black americans want the same thing as every other voter in
6:54 pm
this country which is honesty. it is not good for anyone to feed the victimhood narratives down the throats of graduates from any college. it is sad that he showed up with race baiting and this style of politics when he promised to unite this country, he has failed miserably. i met with a lot of black voters in chicago. many of them are long time democrats, but they are coming our way this year because they are stick and tired of the lives they have been force fed. they want honesty, and i think donald trump is going to be the candidate that gives that to them. >> sean:s isn't it more apparent than ever that the leftist socialist party has really become the party of coastal elites and donald trump, make america great, america first is the party of working men and women in this country? >> look, i think that we are seeing in the republican side is
6:55 pm
a multiethnic group of people that love this country, against a fringe of people that hate america and the founding ideals. it is not black versus white like the media wants you to believe. not man versus woman, or traditional democrat versus republican. the beauty of the america first movement is it includes all americans. whether you are black on the south side of chicago, or in suburbs, you don't illegals pouring across the border by the millions. you want americans lifted up from poverty. that's what we had under donald trump. we had one record, under four years of biden, we have another. that's a once in a century community that voters have to choose between those two records and biden is doing everything he can to deflect away from the truth. he is going to fail. >> sean: how is law and order working out for americans, how is the biden economy, 20% increase in inflation since he
6:56 pm
has been president? you know, how is that open border working for everybody, in every city, in every town? how are things around the world, as america surrendered in the war on terror, war in europe, war in the middle east, not great. anyway, great to have you. we appreciate you. more hannity, straight ahead.
6:57 pm
call or go online now and get 35% off your first order. cordless outdoor power, brings you the ego power+ string trimmer with powerload technology. feed the line, push the button and get back to work. ego,
6:58 pm
exclusively at lowe's, ace and ego authorized dealers.
6:59 pm
[ ♪♪ ]
7:00 pm
>> great news fox nation number 1 and third edition on fox nation. three of four episodes. this one follows the legendary man hunter bass reeves. wait until you hear that story. let not the heart be troubled. greg gutfeld is next. he will put a smile on your face! have a great night! [ cheering and applause ] [ ♪♪ ]