demands as a senator, vice president, and as a president? i find it really quite sad to watch. >> judge jeanine: all right, gentlemen, i want to thank you both very much, and for those that are waiting, it's behind schedule, the president will outline all of this and we will talk about what is at stake letting the world know that he is still president and making some historic moves here, the senator from delaware of course was in charge of this campaign on the significance of everything and more tomorrow. i can tell you that for the time being, the battle is on and this in itself has become a political heated argument that becomes an issue in any debates, should there be any debate? that will do it for us. we will also focus on day one they could be the game changer for a lot of things coming tomorrow. "the five" comes now. ♪ ♪

>> jesse: hello, everybody, i'm jesse watters along with judge jeanine pirro, jessica tarlov, dana perino, and brian kilmeade. it's 5:00 in new york city, and this is "the five." ♪ ♪ don't be fooled by the media's rewrite of kamala's effort, she is as radical as ever and just proved it. a complete overhaul of the supreme court, which includes establishing term limits an ethics code for justices and a brand-new constitutional amendment to prohibit presidential immunity. president biden speaking any moment now and here is what he had to say earlier, watch. >> speaker johnson says your supreme court performance is dead on arrival, what is your reaction, sir? speaker johnson said it is dead on arrival. >> how are you going to get this done?

>> jesse: the vp giving her stamp of approval saying this, these popular reforms will restore confidence in the court strengthen our democracy and ensure no one is above the law. democrat voters may think they are signing on for mainstream moderates and kamala harris, but donald trump's warning, that's not the case. >> if kamala harris gets in, she will be the most extreme radical president in american history. kamala harris is deadly destruction completely and totally disqualified for her to be president, you can't have a person like this i was president. >> i sent in the national guard to save minneapolis while kamala harris signed with the writers and bailed out the criminals all out of jail. >> jesse: judge jeanine, we will take the president when he is ready finally, already about

40 minutes late, the late joe biden, judge jeanine, if i was kamala harris and joe biden tried to do something i would not jump to it at all i would say wait a second, we have to take a minute before we sign on to anything that guy wants. >> judge jeanine: first let me take a line from harold it's good to be back at the table. and okay, look, i agree with you and i will tell you why. she is trying to promote herself as a moderate and to let joe biden do all the hard work with the progressive nonsense and she just coming you know, she just will let the party leaders know that she is and with it, but for the term and duration of this campaign, she does not need to go out there and do it. but i have to tell you, the whole idea of joe biden and his team wanting to change an institution of our government, the united states supreme court which is embedded in the constitution because they don't like a decision that they made, notice they did not do it right

away. i mean, they waited, they got the dobbs decision in the presidential immunity decision and they were like we are going to do this. they did not do it when they had all three houses, but i think that the sad part about this is that they say number one, we want term limits, okay. why don't you oppose term limits on yourselves? why don't you and congress decide that two terms is enough for all of you, because all you do is make money and to make sure that people in their family are able to make money based on inside information, that's number one. a code of conduct is number two, who is congress to impose a code of conduct on the supreme court of the united states? and who the heck is going to enforce that? they are a coequal branch of government and an independent branch of government and they have -- congress has no right to oppose any kind of ethics requirement. by the way as long as they are in good statute, they stay there. and number three, the whole

thing no one is above the law, they think they are above the law, joe biden and the left by changing the supreme court. for 200 years presidents have dealt with the supreme court, but no one said let's do something and get three quarters of the state legislature, two-thirds of the house, two-thirds of the senate and let's try to change everything about the constitution. and you know, d immunity nonsense, they are stupid and did not read the decision. it is not absolute immunity, it is absolute in some cases, partial in other cases, official act has to be determined by the lower court to discern whether or not any immunity applies. so you people are so full of it, you want people to believe that all of the american people will have confidence. no, that's not what this is about. they are upset about the ruling and the fact that the epa regulators are not -- are not now in a position to decide what business they should do as a result of chevron and

over the past two centuries, i mean, everything has been considered a number, this has been proposed, and by the way, let me just say one last thing before joe biden comes on, and that is that i went to portugal the last friday night after i did the show, okay, and she was a border czar, i come back, all of a sudden kamala harris is not the border czar, did somebody have a lobotomy? i mean, what, they gaslighted us all the time, but the president of the united states joe biden calls it a border czar, there are thousands of articles she is the border czar, now they come out and say she was not the border czar, they are not just gaslighting you, they are lying to you. >> jesse: i can't wait to hear more about the portugal trip. we won't even have a decision whether we will hear about it, we will hear about it for quite some time. jessica tarlov, why now? why supreme court? are you going to run against

clarence thomas? >> jessica: sure, happy to run against donald trump for sure, and happy to run against clarence thomas, or at least his in ethical behavior which is what this is about. this is not going to get past, going through congress, it is dead on arrival as that reporter said, but the point is to make this an election issue, and is something that democrats feel very confident that we can do effectively for our side and b, for the biden/harris administration to be responsible for the american public. i understand people can have opposition, but they have been paying attention to where national sentiment is on these issues. really. so 67% of americans want term limits, on the supreme court. that's an ap poll from last summer. in terms of ethics code, 75% of americans would like that, one put out those pieces showing how much clarence thomas has taken and gifts and travel, he had to

amend his financial disclosures because of everything that he took from harlan crow, that raises big red flags, and then you have on the other side -- >> jesse: that raises red flags, but millions from china -- >> jessica: i miss you while you're sick as well, and i did not have anyone doing that to mean last week. joe biden did not take millions from china and we have not heard anything about the hunter biden impeachment -- >> jesse: just sentenced to prison. >> judge jeanine: that's in september. >> jessica: the immunity clause, americans agree they doo not want immunity for actions taken as president. these are popular reforms, like i said they are not going to get past, but it does not mean -- >> jesse: it so funny you are asked to look back acting like

we have been clamoring for supreme court reform, they are clamoring for more money in their paychecks, i've not heard anyone talk about this. >> dana: it so transparent and an election issue, it's not a principle, they do not care when ruth bader ginsburg took way more funded trips, no one gave a, because they were likelier treat taken the trips in a coequal branch of government and the issue that is popular, medicare for all was popular too, 88%, no, we are not for that, so i'm not buying that either, what i am buying this there is a ton of left wing dark money on this issue, it's been going on for several years, look at the cavanaugh hearings, i was a spokesperson for john roberts and alito when they became -- when they were going through their confirmation hearings and it really started to like right after that and they were like wow, we have to do something, and now that group, those dark money groups when a return on their investment. what do they do, they wait until joe biden says i'm going to cure

cancer and fix the supreme court in six months. so here's my idea, he has this op-ed in "the washington post" that obviously somebody else wrote for him and there's no way that if those decisions had gone the way that they wanted that they would be doing this, there is no way that they would be calling for a filibuster reform if the republicans, if the republicans win back the senate, do you think the democrats will say we definitely want to filibuster reform? they definitely will not to. so i get a little bit irritated because it's decisions like this that do something very political that then everyone on the right has to say, actually here is the rules, here is constitution. even though you can have something that's 80% popular when you ask the next question like we are not going to do that, and is not going to do it in six months, what they want is a campaign issue in the media will give it to them. >> jesse: brian kilmeade. >> brian: i'm surprised that joe biden is not interrupting mean, seriously, this is been a wonderful conversation, i did

not need to come to the a block, but i will add something, if this does not have a chance of passing, we all agree with that, but it's going to make people look at the supreme court as some political entity and it's going to lower the validity for the average american to go, that supreme court, all i keep hearing, especially if you're republican, you're fine with it, but the average american, the independent that is not really zoned and what we do every day to go, the supreme court is really corrupt, isn't it? they have no faith in it, oppose joe, less faith, and they are going to sit there and get more guards around their own and feel less and less secure doing what they are doing and it turns out up until 1970, the average years that they serve is about 17, what has happened? we started taking vitamins, jogging, and taking better care of ourselves, started living longer, that's the only thing that has changed. i'm sorry, america, we are living longer and the men and women that where the robes are also living longer, it does not mean it has lost its way in the

constitution need some wind out. so i think we leave things as they are and just one on this, run on this, clarence thomas, not the healthiest person, he's been there 33 years, run on elect me, and i will fill that seat was someone like me, and see what to -- >> judge jeanine: any won and he got the right to appoint three justices. he got the right to appoint three justices, so i'm tired of hearing what the american people want, the american people when they vote for president know that that president is going to appoint a justice similarly of political views. >> jesse: president biden speaking now, on this plan to reform the supreme court, let's listen. [applause]

[cheers and applause] >> president biden: thank you, thank you, really. thank you, mr. ambassador! ambassador, thank you for that introduction, and for all of your friendship over the years. there's only one where that comes to mind every time i think of -- the word is integrity. absolute integrity, and thank you to the johnson family for caring for the legacy of a truly great president and first lady! [applause] the same goes to president of the foundation. it's great to be back here and thank you all for gathering here

today. look, i was in college at the university of delaware inn and the beginning years when i heard the news that president kennedy had been assassinated. i remember exactly where they were sitting, standing, or walking. i was on the steps of one of the halls called holly hall at the university, listening to my radio with three other people, it seemed unbelievable, and then later watching president johnson help the nation find a way forward, and his first address after the tragedy, president johnson said "nothing could more eloquently on her president kennedy's memory than the earliest passage of the civil rights bill. that's what he said. [applause] as a kid coming up, i always

admired president johnson for his public service, whether he was a schoolteacher in south texas, master of the united states senate, historic vice president and president, it was simple, and a great society, in a great society, no one should be left behind. [applause] he would say it's time for us to come to see that every american gets a decent break and a fair chance to make good. and as andy young said, president johnson one of the civil rights leaders to build a coalition to bring that vision to life, he did, he brought it to life. 50 years when the lbj foundation has reflected one of the crowning achievements of the civil rights act of 1964.

a defining moment that has since open doors of opportunities for all americans regardless of race, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religion, national origin, and together through the voting rights act and the fair housing act, these three landmark laws he signed are remarkable in their scale and their scope, taken together, these three acts have made this nation fundamentally more fair, fundamentally more just, and most importantly, fundamentally more consistent with our founding principles. [applause] and we are better nation because of it. we must be clear, their work, our work is not done. it's not done. we do not celebrate these laws as part of our past, but as critical components of her future.

president johnson understood and president lincoln understood in his own time that the courts would determine the scale and scope, the scale and scope of our laws. over 100 years of the emancipation proclamation, president johnson vowed in his words to do this job that lincoln started, to do this job that lincoln started by challenging the court to live up to its constitutional responsibility. he did that by nominating thurgood marshall as the first black justice of the supreme court. [applause] and by aggressively defending civil rights throughout the courts. but now, we live in a different era, and in recent years, extreme opinions of the supreme court has had it down have undermined long civil rights principles and protections. 2013, the supreme court of the

case county rights gutted the act, opening the floodgates of the wave of restrictive voting laws that it seen in states across the country past. in 2022, the court overruled roe v. wade and the right to choose. it had been the law of the land for 50 years, 50 years! the following year, the same court eviscerated affirmative action, which had been upheld and reaffirmed for 50 years as well. and now there is an extreme movement and agenda called project 2025, by the way, they are serious, man. they are playing another onslaught of attacking civil rights in america. for example, project 2025 calls aggressively attacking diversity, equity, and inclusion across all aspects of american

life. this extreme maga movement even ends birthrate of the citizen. if you should be born in america, you are an american citizen. that's how extreme these guys are, this issue in so many other civil rights in america are taken for granted. they are lucky to come before the court in years to come. the most recent and most shockingly, supreme court establishing trump versus united states a dangerous precedent, they ruled as you know that the president of the united states has immunity for potential crimes he may have committed while in office. immunity. this nation was founded on the principle, there are no kings in america. each of us is equal before the law. [applause] no one is above the law. and for all practical purposes,

the court's decision certainly means that a president can violate their oath, flout our laws and face no consequences. here's what justice sotomayor you are, supreme court justice wrote in her dissent. and i quote "under the majority's reasoning, the president now will be isolated from criminal prosecution, orders of navy seals team six to assassinate a rival, immune, organizing a military coup to hold power, immune. it takes a bribe in exchange for pardon, immune. in every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law. that's what justice wrote in the distance. folks, just imagine what a president could do to trample civil rights and liberty is such immunity. the court is being used to weaponize an extreme and unchecked agenda, this decision

is a total affront to the basic expectations we have for those who wield the power in this nation. that they are expected to be wholly accountable under the law. the president is no longer restrained by the law and only limits on abuse of power will be self imposed by the president alone. that's a fundamentally flawed view and a fundamentally flawed principle. a dangerous principle, on top of his extreme decisions, the court is under crisis of ethics, the scandals involving the justices have caused public opinion to question the court's fairness and independence, that are essential to faithfully carrying out the mission that we called justice under the law, for example, for a documented report of decades long judiciary including the supreme court backed by shadow of special

interest that supports project 2025, undisclosed gift to the justices were hundreds of thousands of dollars in wealthy benefactors who have interest before the very court for contributing. conflicts of interest from those connected to january 6th insurrections and a blatant attack on nominated confirming justices of the court itself. do you all remember when justice scalia died on febr february 2016, and the republicans blocked the president's nomination to fill that vacancy for nearly a year, by making up an entirely new standard that there be no confirmations of the court during an election year, but then when justice ginsburg died in 2020, republicans rushed for president trump's nominee at the very same time boats were being cast an election that

donald trump would lose. it's outrageous. [applause] i know i don't look at, but eggs sat in the senate for 36 years. including as chairman rank, the judiciary committee, i've been told that i've ever seen more supreme court nominations at senator, vice president and president than anyone in history, anyone alive today i should say. [applause] i have great respect for institutions and the separations of powers laid out in our constitution, but what is happening now is not consistent with that doctrine of separation of powers. extremism is undermining the public confidence in the courts decisions. as soon as i came to office, i can be a bipartisan commission of the supreme court of the united states, comprised of the scholars both liberal and

conservative to divide recommendations and potential reforms to the court. i've been careful in these liberations, because they are serious serious decisions. and in the threats to american democratic institutions i use the commission's analysis, and today i'm calling for three bold reforms to assert trust and accountability to the court in our democracy. as the press shouted, republican speaker said, whatever he proposes is dead on arrival. but i think his thinking is dead on arrival. [applause] first, when calling for a constitutional amendment, called no one is above the law. it holds! i mean this sincerely, it holds to know immunity for crime a

former president committed while in office. i share -- our founders belief that a president must answer to the law. the president is accountable in the exercise of the great power of the presidency. we are nation of laws, not kings and dictators! [applause] the decision can be boiled down to a case, trump versus united states, the court asserted it was making a ruling for the ages as it should, the court made a ruling for one, it former president, no other president in our history has answered this kind of immunity for criminal actions, and no president, no former president, not me, not one, not one has been given an exception to this

was such immunity. the second thing i am asking for, we have had terms for the president of united states for 75 years after the truman administration and i believe we should have term limits for supreme court justice in the united states as well. [applause] in fact, the united states is the only major democracy that gives lifetime seats to their high court. term limits, what adventure is the courts membership changes, but some of you know that already. that would be timing for the court's nomination more predictable and less arbitrary, reducing the chance of a single president opposes undue influence of generations to come.

but bipartisan commission i convened in the various term of instructions based on the report, i believe the best structure is the 18 new term limit. it would help ensure that the country would not have what it has now the extreme court as a part of an attack on the confirmation process as weaponized those seeking to carry out an extreme agenda for decades to come. finally these guys mean it. these guys mean it. project 2025 is real. they mean it. third, i am calling for binding code of conduct for the supreme court. [applause] the supreme court current code is weak and even more framing voluntary, voluntary. in any code of congress must be

enforceable. under the reform act i propose, justice will be required to those gifts, refraining from public activity, accusing themselves of cases where they have those spots and a financial conflict of interest. most people don't realize -- [applause] that congress passed the law decades ago that says all federal judges including supreme court justices have to recuse themselves in such cases, but the current justices insist on pushing that inquiry requirement to themselves without any public oversight or composure. you see, that is their decision. that might work if it was actually enforcing those requirements, but they are not. the court is not dealing with the obvious conflicts of interest. we need a mandatory code of ethics for this man court and we

need it now. [applause] my fellow americans, based on all of my experience, i am certain that we need these two new reforms. and we assure our trust in the court, reserving the system of checks and balances that are vital to our democracy. we are also common century forms that have vast majority of the american people support as well as leading law scholars come progressive, and other leaders. i look forward to working with congress to implement these forms. let me close with this, president johnson signed the civil rights act in 1964 just two days before the fourth of july. he said in that bill signing, and to quote, this is the proud

trial, yet those who founded our country who their freedom would be secure only if each generation faltering nail and enlarge its money." that's what i have tried do throughout my career inspired by the cause of civil rights. [applause] that's what got me involved initially. my state was a state that was segregated by law. we were one who only fought on the side of the south where we could not get there. i'm serious. what motivated me to be a public defender was accounting counselor, i will never forget, i had a good job with the big trial for the -- in delaware, you have to study for the bar for six months before you are allowed to take

it. and in the meantime i was studying for the bar, that's when dr. king was assassinated. the only state in the nation sitting in the nation that had military stationed at every corner with drone bayonets for ten months, for ten months, and we had a very conservative democratic governor. in those days when the democrats flew in, they could choose whether to be southern governors or northern governors, they would choose southern lots of times, but guess what, got me engaged. and i love how reading these biographies of me, i knew that i was going to run for president. [laughter] i remember walking in to the public defender's office, which was part-time at the time and

asking for an application because i wanted to join the public opinion office and he looked at me and said his friend said, don't you work for sanders? i said yeah, he said why the hill would you want to do this? i said let me do it. i became a public defender. folks, here's the deal, because i got engaged like a lot of you do, whether you run for office or not, you can engage anyone to change things. so i kept trying to change the democratic party by stain, which is very conservative, and then a group of people came to me as my senator knows, chris coons came to me and said, look, we want you to run for state senate. he said i can't, i can't go to dover all the time. i'm just starting a to be a part-time public defender and they and they said when it you go for the county council?

and they said you stupid sob, it's right across the street there. it meets only twice a week. [laughter] so my sister, my best friend manage my campaign and we picked a district that we could not possibly one man, no democrat had ever won, but my problem was that i had my sister doing my campaign. and we won. next thing you know, it's part of a group assigned as young senators, young elected officials to try to bring the party around to get someone to run for the united states senate, and i was put on the commission. when you are the young lawyer, you get to turn the lights on and off every meeting, so i remember going down to the democratic convention off year in dover, delaware, and i left during the afternoon session, went back and was in my room of a nice motel you just drive out,

walk up and getting your door there in an eight by ten bathroom, shower, and stole, and i had my towel around me and the shaving cream on my face and i went bam, bam, bam at my door and i thought it was the guys that came down, bob cunningham was a big civil rights guy, and two others, so i thought it was them and i walked over to the door and there was a former governor, former supreme court justice, swear to god, the state chairman and the former congressman and they said, we just had dinner, i said i'm sorry, gentlemen and walked in and ran under the bathroom and put something on, walk back out in a towel and i was standing next to a desk nailed to the wall and they are on the beds that are nailed to the wall, four of them sitting across and

said, joe, we were thinking, you should run for the united states senate. i said, gentlemen, are you serious? and they went on and made their case. i hope all of you had a professor who is like mine, i one professor who was my political professor at the university of delaware, which is between dover where i was going home, so i called them and asked if i could stop by to see him and i said, what you think i should do? he said, joe, remember what plato said, i'm thinking, what the hell did plato say? seriously. the thing that people pay is being governed by people worse than themselves. you are working 40 hours a week, trying to set up a law form as a public defender, get in or get out. next thing you know, i was

running. and won by 60% of the vote, and we won by a staggering 3800 votes. [applause] i did not know what the hell he was doing, but look, and i went on to be able to wait a little bit to be sworn in, you have to be 30 to get sworn in. and then i was vice president for the first half of the -- the first african american president in history. and now president with our first woman vice president. i have made clear how i feel about kamala, an incredible partner to me, and a champion, she will continue to be an inspiring leader projecting the very idea of america. the very idea that we are all created equal throughout her

life, and never fully lived up to that, but we've never walked away from it. because leaders like lyndon johnson, my folio want my fellow americans, and two years we will commemorate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the declaration of independence. that will be not only about her past, but a better future. imagine that moment and ask yourself, what do we want to be? we can and must be protected and expand our civil rights in america, we can and must prevent the abuse of presidential power, and restore faith. we can and must strengthen the guardrails of democracy, and we have to remind ourselves who we are, we are the united states of america, and there is nothing, nothing beyond her capacity. nothing we do it together, so let's stay together and god bless you all, lyndon johnson, lady johnson,

may god bless the whole family, and may god protect our troops, thank you for listening. ♪ ♪ >> jesse: that was joe biden in a rambling address where he laid out a plan to break up the supreme court and then told a lot of great stories from the '70s. you had something you wanted to say before he so rudely interrupted you, brian kilmeade. >> i think you just made the supreme court even more political than possible and brings out project 25 and roe v. wade and then he does not bring up the fact that john roberts and the supreme court justice saved obamacare and i just think he had an opportunity to balance it out, but it's a campaign speech that he was probably going to make only the part of that kamala harris was a great leader of the future was probably not in the original copy since he dropped out on sunday. it's a little disappointing, but now the supreme court will be dragged through it. and i think that every time the supreme court justices instead of walking around with pride, they will walking around feeling

like they are a target. >> judge jeanine: i want to say something about it too, he talked about fundamental fairness in the fact that they are going to undermine the civil rights protections, well, joe biden worked for the pipes out there and southern senators and robert byrd when he came to the summit took back busing, those filibustered the civil rights act in 1964 and he called byrd his mentor, so, you know, this guy just -- >> brian: he gave his eulogy. >> judge jeanine: yes come in and making sure that they have an ethics guideline, and the staff was always prodding people and colleagues and libraries to buy her books. i mean, don't make it about just one side. but anyway. >> jessica: those are not comparable, they sent back bagels. >> judge jeanine: let me tell you something. you want to make a criticism

about thomas, i can make a criticism about -- you can't decide that they are not comparable. wait a minute, you are to impose on people you have to buy my bosses book and going out to whatever she lectures. >> jessica: are flying off on private jets to remote islands -- >> judge jeanine: this is not worth it. you said your point and i set mine, now let's turn to this. if you thought the democrats anti-maga agenda could not get any more ridiculous, the party rallying behind kamala harris leaning into the word weird to attack donald trump and his running mate j.d. vance, a call back to the attack against donald trump if she were ever to face him on the debate stage. >> well, it's just plain weird. i mean, that's the box he put that end, right? >> it's not just a weird style that he brings, it's that this leads to weird policies. >> that is weird behavior. >> more extreme, more weird,

more erratic. speak on the other side, they are just weird. >> 32 ounces of weird. >> and by the way, they are weird. >> it is bizarre, it is weird. it is weird. >> j.d. vance, just dumb vance is pretty weird. >> judge jeanine: j.d. vance brushing off the attack says keep them coming. >> does not hurt my feelings, the price of getting to serve the people in this country is the democrats are going to attack us with everything they have. i think it's an honor. >> judge jeanine: and the media's honeymoon with kamala is far from over, here with the democrat cheerleaders titled welcome to kamalot. i'll start with you, brian, they are changing, we were extremists, we were radical, and now we are just weird. why are they softening the terminology when we needed to be

deprogrammed, we were a cold, now we are weird. >> i could give my opinion, i'm not sure what's behind it i was not a part of that think tank, but it will say this, the whole democracy at stake was not working, but saying donald trump is going to overturn democracy was not working putting him in jail was not working, so now they say these are the candidates we have a deal with, so let's make them weird. and i thought that donald trump jr. put out a couple of videos that set i will give you weird, kamala harris giving her pronouns before a big speech to chris cuomo before a major thing, and he talked about some of her stances when it comes to aoc saying that we should start texting people 80%, she is like, that's a good innovative idea, that's kind of weird. also i think outside jesse, most of us are weird. outside jesse, most of us have a little bit of thing that is a little nontraditional. and i think that by calling people weird it makes them more relatable. >> judge jeanine: as this a part of their effort to appeal

to gen z? because they may buy into that? >> dana: obviously it was a poll tested word, what i think is weird is not listening to yourself, today we call them weird, got it, and then everyone does it. it's so bizarre i would rather just think for myself. i also think it's a more best language, it can be good, right? i guess, but online it's pretty interesting to say that j.d. vance is weird and then you click on the picture and it's on my craziness on the left, so i don't know where this is all going. i think that both sides are trying to land on how they want to define each other now, because the race is different. >> judge jeanine: could it be that people are tired of the name-calling? >> jesse: i'm not tired of it, i love the name-calling and i like laughing, but i guess we have to go with wh what's the nw one? crazy? listen, i think probably november 6th the democrats are going to look back at this lame

slide show lacking they got and figure why did i waste three days in late july calling the trump people weird? the only way she has a shot and he shot is if she distinguishes herself from joe biden. she has to say how she is different from joe biden. she can't say she is the left of joe biden, there's nowhere else. that's as far as we have gotten. she has to say what you would do differently and why she would do it differently. if she just runs as a new face of the joe biden administration it's just a hellacious disaster. now if you have been called a racist dictator and then they start calling you weird, i bet he's pretty happy with that. now when i saw donald trump demolish joe biden for 90 minutes i did not seem as weird. when i saw him go like this, fight, fight, fight after surviving a bullet, i did not think weird, people don't see that when they see donald trump. and if you want to play that game, we can play it all day. look at the biden white house

coming of cocaine, rabid dogs, secret parkinson's doctors, bill and marie all up in that place, its political projection, they leave something, she's going to be called weird, okay, rubber, glue, this is the lamest thing ever. i miss the heavy days of the big debates about nuclear policy from the '80s. that's what i really miss, jessica. can we get back to that, please. >> while i was gone, one of the most unpopular politicians in the country has gone up eight points and i don't know that she is done much in the week that i've been gone, but doesn't that show how the media can actually formulate the public's opinion about who they want? >> jessica: i think that applies to us too, people watch us on tv, and it affects their opinions, and there's no doubt she's had a good week, but she has flat out had a good week. she has done really effective rallies, her team of surrogates, and that's where weird comes from, is governor tim wilds from

minnesota who has a very clean and speaking way about him and he was giving an interview and he said, they are just weird, and then it caught on from there. and i think that people are sick of the vitriol, they are sick of hearing that it is the end of the earth if x happens, people live through four years of donald trump and came out the other side of it and then went and elected joe biden, but don't feel that he is the existential threat to necessarily as brian was bringing up, so there has to be a reframing. but to jesse's point that people don't think that donald trump is weird, you listen to these rallies where he is talking about sharks getting electrocuted, no, you could say that, if you're not a die-hard trump supporter, the late great hannibal lector does not resonate in the same way, the sharks, the weird stuff about batteries, like donald trump is not a normal human, and i guess it's only in jesse is normal. >> dana: should we pull up the tapes of kamala harris.

>> jesse: you took $10 trillion, and he installed eights, that's weird. >> jessica: whatever the strategy is now, it's working, kamala harris is running tight or ahead in national polling, same in the swing states. not just a hunch, up 12 points while they have gone out -- >> jesse: she's the next obama, i am so nervous. >> dana: i am like we have to tease. because we have to tease. >> jesse: kamala harris, the next barack obama, how do we stop her, brian? >> judge jeanine: outrage over the olympics opening ceremony, coming up, outrage over the olympics opening ceremony, mocking christians and the last supper. here we go.

♪ ♪ my dad believed in hard work, and the farm was the perfect place to learn grit, determination and problem solving. we're taking that passion and channeling it through our farm to home bedding bath, and apparel at red land cotton. we grow cotton in the rich red earth of north alabama. and we want our products to be made here in the usa, from the seed in the ground to the final stitch. go to red land cotton dot com and receive 20% off your order with code fox 20 (tony hawk) skating for over 45 years has taken a toll on my body. i take qunol turmeric because it helps with healthy joints and inflammation support. why qunol? it has superior absorption compared to regular turmeric. qunol. the brand i trust. frustrated by skin tags? dr. scholl's has the breakthrough you've been waiting for. now there's an easier-to-use at home skin tag remover, clinically proven to remove skin tags

safely in as little as one treatment. hey folks, chris counahan here with leaffilter, america's largest gutter and gutter protection company. leaffilter has over 150 locations and has been installed on over a million homes. we've been protecting homes now for over 20 years. our patented technology offers total protection for your home and comes with a lifetime transferable warranty. the process is simple. give us a call to schedule your free gutter inspection. if you decide to move forward with the project, you put nothing down at all. 833 leaffilter or visit leaffilter.com today. sure, i'm a paid actor, and this is not a real company, but there is no way to fake how upwork can help your business. search talent all over the world with over 10,000 skills you may not have in house. more than 30% of the fortune 500 use upwork

because this is how we work now.

♪ ♪ >> brian: the olympic opening ceremony, taking home the gold

for being woke, showing the athletes, featuring drag queens appearing to act out scenes from the last supper depicted by leonardo da vinci, one of my favorite painters after view of backlash to boycott the games, the youtube page wiped out from the video feed because it was getting pretty roundly criticized, paris 2024 spokesperson apologized saying they didn't mean to offend anyone. dana, there is no way they could of watch rehearsal and thought this will be perfect. >> dana: they did not watch it and go, wow, this is weird? i don't like that it took away from all of the athletes, they have worked so hard their whole lives for this moment, and if you think back to the london olympics remember they have to clean parachuting into the opening ceremony with james bond, they had a spice girls reunion, they had chariots of fire, the french have a rich history to drawn, they just did not use it. >> brian: and they say we are

going to emphasize our country make it look good, do you think the french are happy with the way that they are being betrayed around the world, the opening ceremonies signifies what their ceremony is about? >> jesse: i think the french love it, they have a rich tradition in theater, you should take in some of that culture, i mean, listen, am i really shocked that there is some gender bending in paris, no. i had a collection and mills to win, brian, and i can't chase every rabbit they throw at us. this is not the last supper, it was greek goddess of dynasties, and i will take them at their word, i know that's when l.a. has the games and 28, there are going to be trans, you think l.a. is not going to try to out translate french, get ready, brian. >> brian: joe biden praise the ceremony saying it's high praise and is going to have a lot to live up to, jessica, do you think joe biden is on the money? >> jessica: it was a spectacle, for sure, i watched it was very excited by the holding come of the

marie antoinette thing was incredible, was so fun mocking, no one? >> brian: nothing like a royal being beheaded to lift you up. judge. >> judge jeanine: is supposed to be about unity and camaraderie and how we are basically in this together, i mean they are tone-deaf, they insulted 2 billion christians, okay, and you would think that in the country that it charlie hurt though, those attacks in 2011 because they did the cartoon of mohammed and ended up killing all of the editors in this firebomb back then. >> brian: they can do the closing ceremonies on mohammed. >> judge jeanine: they know what happens, christians turn the other cheek. >> dana: who are the one sabotaging the olympics? it's not the christians. >> brian: "the five" has "one more thing" next. >> dana: i guess we will never

know. ♪ ♪ think about this: blue jays, cardinals, orioles... what's missing? the andean condor? no, walnut-brain! pigeons! they'd rather name a team after socks! to be fair, we're not very athletic. hi guys! bill, you look great! now that i have inspire, i'm free from struggling with the mask and the hose. inspire? inspire is a sleep apnea treatment that works inside my body with a click of this button. where are you going? i'm going to get inspire. learn more and view important safety information at inspiresleep.com. why didn't we do this last year? before you were preventing migraine with qulipta®? remember the pain? cancelled plans? the worry? that was then. and look at me now. you'll never truly forget migraine. but qulipta® reduces attacks, making zero-migraine days possible. it's the only pill of its kind that blocks cgrp - and is approved

to prevent migraine of any frequency. to help give you that forget-you-get migraine feeling. don't take if allergic to qulipta®. most common side effects are nausea, constipation, and sleepiness. learn how abbvie could help you save. qulipta®. the forget-you-get migraine medicine™. 1-sz 1-sz #

>> one more thing tonight "jesse watters primetime" 8:00 when we will have patrick david, michael shellenberger and johnny belisario. interest he is, judge jeanine time-out. time-out market. i swear they have a hundred like restaurants around this area where they can hold like 500, # hundred people. you two and buy food. i have my food there i have the sardine. next is the coast which isn't much of a coast but that's another question. another issue. then we went to the wine country. porto it's magnificent. i went with four of my girlfriends. we had the best time is. and then there was a church in centra which is in the northern part of portugal.

it was wonderful. we were at the paris cafe in centra. these are the pictures with the girls. incredible restaurant which i have pictures of and it was magnificent. ladies, have you got hear this. open until like 3:00 in the morning. can you go to the ladies room while you are eating and then can you shop in all the stores in the same area. fantastic. >> jesse: fox nation didn't pay for this? you paid for this yourself? >> judge jeanine: hope, paid for it. >> dana: in style magazine i had an interview with them how to keep your mind and still do your civic duty. it's on instyle magazine with chris is tina. she was a great interviewer and i appreciated the interview there perino on politics with michael dunkin'. >> brian: i like michael duncan. >> jesse: not going to give you the last word. i apologize. it's it for us. >> bret: i will wait, jesse. [laughter]

>>