headlines and polly middlehurst. >> mark, thank you and good evening to you. well our top story tonight is that the labour leader has criticised the first king's speech to parliament in 70 years by saying the only fight left in the government is the fight for their own skin . the fight for their own skin. earlier, king charles outlined the prime minister's legislative agenda for the year ahead amid traditional pomp and pageantry . traditional pomp and pageantry. the speech included measures on tougher sentencing for murderers and a ban on leaseholds for new houses built in england and wales . sir keir starmer said the wales. sir keir starmer said the conservatives were severing britain's future . rishi sunak britain's future. rishi sunak hit back by saying the new measures will change the country for the better. now the foreign office says that more british nationals have crossed the border into egypt from gaza via the rafah crossing today , adding the rafah crossing today, adding that the uk teams continuing to provide consular support to victims wishing to flee the area. this comes as ministers

held an emergency cobra meeting to discuss the impact of the israel—hamas conflict on the uk. today marks a month since the october the 7th hamas terror attacks on israel and hundreds of people gathered outside downing street to hold a memorial vigil for those who've died in the conflict . and the died in the conflict. and the government says it's carefully considering any application by police to prevent protests planned for remembrance weekend . planned for remembrance weekend. the metropolitan police is asking organisers to urgently reconsider demonstrations planned in london for this weekend because of their assessment of the risk of violence . but the violence. but the pro—palestinian coalition are refusing to cancel the demonstration. police could request the marches banned if there's a threat of serious pubuc there's a threat of serious public disorder. but the met police chief, sir mark rowley, says the police can only do what it can to protect remembrance events as the remembrance events will not be disturbed .

will not be disturbed. >> and whatever protest and other events go on, we will do our utmost to protect those because they are so critical. people shouldn't be in fear that those are going to be compromised and we will do everything possible to make sure they're not. and the second point about protests, though, there be protest this there will be a protest this weekend. parliament is very clear about that. the law provides no mechanism to ban a gathering, a static protest , a gathering, a static protest, a rally, anything like that . rally, anything like that. >> sir mark rowley there. now let's bring you a bit more detail on that breaking news. we brought to you an hour ago concerning events in yorkshire where police have launched a murder investigation after a 15 year old boy died after being stabbed outside a school in leeds earlier , the teenager had leeds earlier, the teenager had been rushed to hospital in a critical condition following the assault in horsforth just after 3:00 this afternoon. a teenager has been arrested in connection with the incident. the headteacher of horsforth north school says the boy who was

attacked was a former pupil. police cordons remain in place in the area . now. lastly, prince in the area. now. lastly, prince harry has been delivering a very special message of to hope military veterans attending an eventin military veterans attending an event in new york. the duke of sussex's video message was played at the 17th annual stand up played at the 17th annual stand up for heroes event at the lincoln centre yesterday . the lincoln centre yesterday. the prince cracked a few jokes , but prince cracked a few jokes, but also spoke more seriously about what he describes as the hugely important close ness of the military community. prince harry is a patron, of course, of the invictus games, a sports tournament uniquely for injured servicemen and women on tv, online, dab+ radio and the tune—in app. this is gb news, britain's news channel . britain's news channel. >> good evening . at the end of

>> good evening. at the end of a tory government, the best thing they can offer in the king's speech today is a plan to get us off cigarettes . rishi sunak's off cigarettes. rishi sunak's premiership is going up in smoke with even tory backbenchers looking like they want to be stubbed out a measly total of 21 laws were announced by a stately king charles, who looked about as unexcited as the rest of us. even with a double espresso , i even with a double espresso, i struggled to stay awake for this one. where is the tangible action to stop illegal immigration? where is the plan for economic growth with taxes on business and individuals at a record high, where is the much needed reform of our nhs? once our pride and joy and now a national embarrassment ? where is national embarrassment? where is the plan to make the nhs leaner, meaner and better? i awoke from my slumber briefly this afternoon with the announcement about driverless cars . what about driverless cars. what a great metaphor for this current administration, but there were

some positives tougher sentences for murderers and rapists and deaung for murderers and rapists and dealing with antisocial behaviour. if nadine dorries new bookis behaviour. if nadine dorries new book is to be believed, they should start with tory backbenchers . there's a backbenchers. there's a crackdown on bad landlords. the axing of those dreadful leaseholds on properties and a clear message to the energy industry drill, baby, drill. with his sensible approach to net zero. rishi sunak could turn the tide on the labour landslide. the pm is set to approve scores of oil and gas licences , which will guarantee licences, which will guarantee supply in the years ahead. why so that we're not reliant on vladimir putin for gas. so that we're not reliant on vladimir putin for gas . the wise vladimir putin for gas. the wise decision to give petrol and diesel cars a five year stay of execution and allowing people to continue using perfectly functional gas boilers is the one thing which can give his own party a glimmer of hope. pushing back on the global green agenda with all its powerful interest

groups shows political and moral courage from the prime minister. something sorely lacking from the cervix. free leader of the opposition, sir keir starmer , a opposition, sir keir starmer, a man whose bendier than uri geller, spoon this guy will morph into any shape you want him to. he wanted to cancel brexit with a second referendum, but now he's its biggest champion . he campaigned for champion. he campaigned for jeremy corbyn, his friend, to be prime minister , but went on to prime minister, but went on to expel him from the party. he vocally supports the war dead and israel , vocally supports the war dead and israel, but vocally supports the war dead and israel , but mysteriously and israel, but mysteriously forgets to wear a poppy whilst addressing british muslims. was that an accident like labour's say, poppycock ? and if starmer say, poppycock? and if starmer gets in, he will risk our energy supply and potentially spike energy costs and therefore inflation by betting the house on flaky renewables. even though a recent auction of wind farm licences saw no takers from the private sector. make of that,

what you will. starmer wants to gamble borrowed billions your money and mine on a 1970s style energy company called great british energy , which i fear british energy, which i fear will be a great british disaster. so whilst today's king's speech was about as exciting as a night on the tiles with mary berry, the message to the public remains the same . the the public remains the same. the tories are terrible , but labour tories are terrible, but labour would be worse off. is that enough to help the tories in what is now expected to be a surprise? may election? i wouldn't hold my breath. your reaction ? market gbnews.com. reaction? market gb news.com. let's reaction? market gbnews.com. let's get the thoughts now of my very explosive panel. former cabinet minister gb news star esther mcvey , mp banker and esther mcvey, mp banker and visiting professor derek lord and author and journalist rebecca reid. rebecca, let me start with you. your reaction to the king's speech today. did you hear what you wanted to. >> first of all, i think he did a lovely job and i think he should be very proud of himself because that's got to be quite a

big moment. yes. >> obviously the king, not rishi. >> no, no, no, no. we're going to come on to that. the king fan of the kings. i was really struck by american felt. struck by how american it felt. i that rishi is creating i think that rishi is creating a sort of palo alto, california vibe the ai, the vibe here. so the ai, the driverless cars or the smoke free environment, is a very free environment, that is a very kind californian tech bro kind of californian tech bro kind of californian tech bro kind lifestyle. kind of lifestyle. >> what does rishi >> at what point does rishi sunak think sunak smoke marijuana? i think on air, you know, i would love that. >> and that might be like a bit more even moving towards one sort of qualification at the end of school is the american education think education system. and i think we've all heard rumours that he's one on he's kind of got one eye on california. don't go california. if things don't go the wants to after the the way he wants to after the election. and i think maybe he's either way, he wants to create that world himself here he that world for himself here he spends of on those spends a lot of time on those kinds of people. clearly has kinds of people. he clearly has some elon musk, which some time for elon musk, which i find and think that find confusing. and i think that i feel that. but it i can really feel that. but it didn't confusing likes didn't confusing that he likes a champion free speech, champion of free speech, champion of free speech, but a very odd, very gauche man with very, very, very worrying attitude ai. okay attitude towards ai. okay i'm i'm the that i'm concerned by the fact that this feel very british.

this doesn't feel very british. it feel very british this doesn't feel very british. it first. zl very british this doesn't feel very british. it first. it very british this doesn't feel very british. it first. it doesn'ttish this doesn't feel very british. it first. it doesn't feel people first. it doesn't feel very traditional, doesn't feel like bringing like it's really bringing back any stuff about the any of the great stuff about the country, for is a while country, which for me is a while ago now. and just felt very ago now. and it just felt very like had gone through like they had gone through a tick what's something tick list of what's something that everybody from every demographic will chuck it demographic will like. chuck it all hope nobody's all in and hope that nobody's cross. as much cross. it doesn't feel as much passion there either. there was a message, though, which passion there either. there was a that message, though, which passion there either. there was a that me tories though, which passion there either. there was a that me tories are ugh, which passion there either. there was a that me tories are not which is that the tories are not great, labour would be w0 i'se. woi'se. >> worse. >> yes, it's very hypothetical. >> yes, it's very hypothetical. >> obviously. don't think >> obviously. i don't think labour will be worse. i think labour will be worse. i think labour be i think labour will be better. i think things british energy labour will be better. i think thingsbe british energy labour will be better. i think things be fantastic. �*itish energy labour will be better. i think thingsbe fantastic. it sh energy labour will be better. i think things be fantastic. it couldzrgy labour will be better. i think thingsbe fantastic. it could be' could be fantastic. it could be that of fdr's new that his version of fdr's new deal that his version of fdr's new deal, could be deal, it could be why a taxpayer's gambling on it? because i think we have to do something. i mean, aren't something. i mean, things aren't good private sector won't good if the private sector won't gamble renewables. good if the private sector won't garwhy renewables. good if the private sector won't garwhy are renewables. good if the private sector won't garwhy are we? renewables. good if the private sector won't garwhy are we? renew'wees. good if the private sector won't garwhy are we? renew'we mugs >> why are we? aren't we mugs for doing that? >> it's a risk, absolutely. but i don't think anybody thinks things well right now. things are going well right now. i also the i think and also i think the tories deserve a rest. honestly. they have had too long. they are exhausted. end of they have had too long. they are exhauthey end of they have had too long. they are exhauthey need end of they have had too long. they are exhauthey need to end of they have had too long. they are exhau they need to have of they have had too long. they are exhau they need to have a video term. they need to have a video on and then be sent home and have a long sleep. esther

have a nice long sleep. esther you need a rest. >> five years out of office. regroup your regroup rediscover your conservative values. that's all very socialist to say very kind of socialist to say that, i don't obviously that, but i don't obviously agree all. agree with it at all. >> know. so no carry on. >> but you know. so no carry on. >> but you know. so no carry on. >> what you make of the >> what did you make of the king's were you happy king's speech were you happy with it? because, of course, it's the programme of your government. >> well, what would say more >> well, what i would say more and legislation regulating >> well, what i would say more ara legislation regulating >> well, what i would say more ara socialist|islation regulating >> well, what i would say more ara socialist utopia. regulating is a socialist utopia. conservatives actually conservatives don't actually want more legislation. want more and more legislation. and want to and that's not what we want to do. but what i will say for me personally, when talk about personally, when you talk about the where the country is the tax and where the country is going, my moment i'll going, my big moment i'll be looking the budget the looking at the budget and the autumn i want tax to autumn statement. i want tax to come and will be come down and that will be happening there. i want happening there. so i want corporation down, corporation tax down, inheritance down, and inheritance tax down, and obviously levels of obviously those higher levels of tax down. so i will tax to come down. so i will be looking budget you looking at the budget then. you talked immigration. talked about the immigration. well, already well, those laws are already through. we have the illegal migration bill. so what we need there is the supreme court judgement to go through. so these are things and you are right, it's the last year probably we think probably or whenever we think it's be before the it's going to be before the general election. so you don't put loads stuff in now. put loads of stuff in now. so

you this time 21 you heard this time round 21 bills with seven carried over. you over things over you can't carry over things over a in a general election. so what you'd find is you'd have to try and get everything through which ends grubby deals to ends up in maybe grubby deals to try things through. try and get things through. things down with the things watered down with the house of lords. that's one house of lords. so that's one reason probably wouldn't be reason you probably wouldn't be putting through rishi putting too much through rishi is completer so that is a completer finisher, so that which totally understand what which i totally understand what you meant. you felt it was very much a ticking off list. much like a ticking off list. i think there was complete finish. have this? the have we done this? the immigration an to get done immigration an got to get done and got to have that and we've got to have that supreme court judgement and then the talked about the other thing you talked about like need laws like the nhs doesn't need laws for to get working for that to get working properly. got to sort out properly. we've got to sort out the industrial action and we've got list got to get the waiting list down. so i think that's what you've got to see. where is it in political cycle? yes he in the political cycle? yes he needs complete needs to complete and finish a lot of those things didn't need laws. actually the laws. they actually need the supreme judgement, supreme court judgement, the work and the work to come through and the budget, is what i'm budget, which is what i'm interested taxes coming down. >> did the king's speech reflect a that's running out a government that's running out of derek and running out of ideas? derek and running out

of ideas? derek and running out of steam and running out of time? >> i, i have met every person that's been prime minister since douglas hume rishi sunak. >> you're not that old. >> you're not that old. >> no. rishi sunak rishi sunak is the only prime minister. i have not so far met. he's taken a year to say how do you do to the nation? it was a damp handshake. the nation? it was a damp handshake . look, for me, i'm handshake. look, for me, i'm very disappointed by the king's speech. i don't think that the proposals in it will change the dial for the conservative party, which is very much needs id, and i think that the real consequence of these proposals will be blue on blue fights because there's so much in it that's profoundly anti—liberal . that's profoundly anti—liberal. >> rachel rebecca, i am quite a libertarian person. i like a little intervention in life as possible. i would overturn the

smoking ban. i would say that if you have a pub, you should be able to decide what happens in there. to did feel there. and to me this did feel very it like very intervention. it feels like he is quite to left wing even for you. no, no, no. i a left wing does not mean you want to be told what to do. i hate authority. drives me mad. authority. it drives me mad. but he really just kind he feels like really just kind of feels like quite a strict dad to me sometimes. and i kind of want please leave me want to be like, please leave me alone. can i give a high five? >> because you're quite right. i actually don't think it's also workable. okay. how are you going say to somebody when going to say to somebody when the no, you can't have a the 55 no, you can't have a cigarette going cigarette and they're to going be pretending a year be pretending they're a year old? 55. i'm 56. give me old? i'm not 55. i'm 56. give me a pack of. i think it'll be unworkable. now, listen, i happen think you are the happen to think you are the a—list tonight. a—list panel tonight. >> i did ask you to talk >> i did ask you not to talk over each other, didn't over each other, but i didn't say should agree. say you should agree. >> i well, we're all shocked on that one. >> tell you. you're all >> let me tell you. you're all talking rubbish. anyway, there's only care about, only one opinion i care about, andifs only one opinion i care about, and it's yours. what you and it's yours. what do you think? mark gbnews.com. your reaction heard in reaction to what you've heard in the still to come the king's speech. still to come in, a dramatic to royal

in, a dramatic twist to royal snub an almighty public snub gate, an almighty public row out between the row has broken out between the palace sussexes with palace and the sussexes with harry insisting king harry and meghan insisting king charles them to charles did not invite them to his birthday bash they're his 75th birthday bash they're not for christmas. not even invited for christmas. the insider levin the royal insider angela levin cuts to cuts through the noise to deliver the truth on this bombshell story shortly. but next in the clash, as pro next up in the clash, as pro palestine protesters vandalised rochdale's the rochdale's cenotaph. should the government the bullets and government bite the bullets and ban marches on armistice day? excursion colonel philip ingram takes on human rights lawyer shoaib khan in a few moments time. sparks will fly.

pm. on gb news, the people's channel pm. on gb news, the people's channel, britain's news channel . channel, britain's news channel. >> well, a big reaction to my big opinion. it was the king's speech. and i'll be honest, i thought it was thin gruel. alastair says. good evening, mark. mr starmer is a political disaster waiting to happen. however, the conservative lives have missed the boat on this and have missed the boat on this and have missed the boat on this and have missed stopping the boats hiding behind the echr. they've also missed the opportunity to reduce the tax burden by increasing the income tax threshold. may be just maybe this has been saved for the autumn statement. what an astute email, alastair. i've got to say , i think the king's speech was the quiet before the storm. you wait for that autumn statement. i think there are goodies in santas sack now angela levin and richard tice on the way. but it's richard tice on the way. but wsfime richard tice on the way. but it's time now for the clash . and it's time now for the clash. and breaking tonight , protesters breaking tonight, protesters have vandalised the rochdale cenotaph with free palestine in

graffiti in the latest assault against british war memorials. greater manchester police have said that officers have been stationed beside the cenotaph to stand guard, which is currently being treated as a crime scene . being treated as a crime scene. but on this occasion it's too little , too late. this week of little, too late. this week of all weeks , police forces up and all weeks, police forces up and down the country should be deployed to protect the memorial for war dead. that is my for our war dead. that is my view. i think cops should protect our history, our values , protect our history, our values, and the memory of those who gave their lives for the freedom we now enjoy . the incident comes as now enjoy. the incident comes as a spokesperson for rishi sunak revealed the prime minister believes a planned pro—palestinian march would be provocative and disrespectful while with the met. police also urging protesters to urgently reconsider. but police chief sir mark rowley has stopped short of banning saturday's protest because he says the threshold for disorder has not been met. but is he passing the buck? so tonight, i'm asking in the clash, should the government ban

marches on armistice day? let me know your thoughts. mark gb news dot com or tweet me at gb news and do vote in the poll. but to debate this, delighted to debate this, i'm delighted to welcome colonel philip ingram and human rights lawyer shoaib khan. me start with khan. shoaib, let me start with you think it's rather you. don't you think it's rather unedifying for the police to be begging groups not to begging these groups not to protest at a time when we are there remember our war dead ? there to remember our war dead? >> no, you're right. it is unedifying to be begging them not to protest. they should be allowed to protest. i don't know why anyone's doing that. what we need to be doing. what obviously we be understood to be the case anyway. responsible , anyway. what the responsible, mature the police mature leadership or the police would is just people would do is just remind people obviously , don't be violent, obviously, don't be violent, don't be disruptive . we don't don't be disruptive. we don't want tensions. there want community tensions. there so, you know, i mean, obviously, if we had mature leadership, so, you know, i mean, obviously, if we iwhat mature leadership, so, you know, i mean, obviously, if we iwhat matur

freedoms, this is the freedom that they were fighting so that they were fighting for. so we allow our enemies in we didn't allow our enemies in world i to away these world war i to take away these freedoms. now allow the freedoms. and now we allow the metropolitan or the tory metropolitan police or the tory leadership now to take those freedoms think have freedoms away. i think have anything. that is the anything. mr khan that is the day that is the day day we need to that is the day we need be out there we need to be out there protesting. they have always been officers during remembrance sunday, day , law and sunday, armistice day, law and order is always kept . order is always kept. >> there are always troublemakers and i think the met police and the government should put their foot down and make sure that those who gave their lives for the freedom that we are actually we now enjoy are actually properly, properly honoured . mr properly, properly honoured. mr khan oh, sorry. >> me again . khan oh, sorry. >> me again. no, but khan oh, sorry. >> me again . no, but that's the >> me again. no, but that's the thing. i mean, why would they be dishonoured by that? the whole point is armistice day ceasefire are dishonoured by people chanting messages of hate . on chanting messages of hate. on that. i mean, we don't think that. i mean, we don't think that i mean, as far as i know, that's not even on the route. no one had even thought of the cenotaph or whitehall before the

home secretary started speaking about this. no one even connected that's not where connected that. that's not where we're would we're going. that's not. would there be any hate marches on this sacred weekend? >> ? >> shoaib? >> shoaib? >> i know what you mean by >> i don't know what you mean by hate marches. >> they protest >> should they be protest marches in which hate is being hate is being yelled out. >> people are calling for an intifada holy a jihad . intifada, a holy war, a jihad. jewish people afraid to leave their homes. the last four weekends. why should we have that this coming weekend when we're there to remember the heroes of the first and second world war? >> because this is exactly what our heroes died and fought for. this freedom, these protections thatis this freedom, these protections that is what we're supposed to be doing. they fought for peace. they fought for an armistice then. an armistice is what then. and an armistice is what these people want now. >> ex—colonel philip ingram, your thoughts on this, sir, in a way , our other guest is way, our other guest is describing what he's describing as completely accurate. >> you know, we did fight for the freedoms of this country, but we also respect that there's a little bit of decorum . you'll a little bit of decorum. you'll not people going and

not find people going and protesting if they disagree outside synagogues or outside churches at christmas or outside mosques, at different times, if they disagree with what's going on. think the metropolitan on. and i think the metropolitan police quite mature in police were quite mature in asking the organisers just to postpone it, not to cancel it. and we've already started to see where extreme elements of those that are latching on to the perfectly legitimate and peaceful protests are carrying out acts of vandalism or violent acts. we saw the attacking of a poppy acts. we saw the attacking of a poppy seller in waverley station, edinburgh last night. we've seen the daubing of pro—palestinian graffiti on the memorial in rochdale and the police are now having to guard that. we've had statements in the daily mail that football thugs are going to try and protect the cenotaph in london. well, all that's going to do is stir things up. and we've got those that are coming into the pro—palestine march coming through the same railway stations as the veterans who'll be in their medals and wearing

their berries and getting ready for armistice day on saturday and for remembrance sunday on on sunday. and that is going to be a point of real friction that's there . if the marchers, the there. if the marchers, the pro—palestine marchers respected the fact that they've been given this freedom to march because people have sacrificed their lives and they put that respect back again, i think they would hold a much better place in people's hearts in the country. it's just showing little decorum. >> colonel , decorum. >> colonel, does it decorum. >> colonel , does it show decorum. >> colonel, does it show up? >> colonel, does it show up? >> can have a very good point. but if you were to ban demonstrations weekend , is demonstrations this weekend, is that not against british values as it is until it gets to the point where you identify a potential growing threat? >> because it's armistice weekend and because it's remembrance weekend and because you've got so many friction points there, we've seen extreme elements trying to hijack elements trying to hijack elements of the march with their pro—hamas cries with a pro—hamas symbology and therefore

countering the terrorism act. this is too good an opportunity for that not to grow and for potentially terrorism to grow out of it. we have to recognise that the police are there to keep the public safe. first and foremost, and if they feel that the march going ahead is going to make the public less safe, it's within their powers to ban it. and i think we're on that cusp point at the moment. >> so the bottom line is, don't you think this rather sacred weekend, it's disrespectful for anyone to go on a march other than to remember the war dead? it's about the timing. they can go on friday, they can go on monday, but not armistice day, not remembrance sunday. it's about the timing plus , many about the timing plus, many march in peace, but there's no way that everyone will behave themselves . themselves. >> no, but that's exactly the thing . isn't armistice day. the thing. isn't armistice day. the day for peace, isn't it? exactly about ceasefire, isn't it? exactly about people laying down their weapons and coming together and. >> yes. and it's not the day to call for a holy war.

>> of course it isn't. and but do we think friday is fine for that? are you thinking are you saying friday is fine for that? i don't think you are. >> and that's no day is fine for that, but particularly not saturday and sunday when we remember two world remember our heroes of two world wars. no particularly wars. there's no particularly about that. >> there's particularly >> there's no particularly about that. doing that. what we shouldn't be doing that. what we shouldn't be doing that we shouldn't do a day that day. we shouldn't do a day before, but we shouldn't do a day before. do that day before. we shouldn't do that day. we can do and should day. what we can do and should do should encourage is a do and should encourage is a peaceful and a march on peaceful protest and a march on that day of the that day, on the day of the trouble organisers can't trouble is the organisers can't control everyone there. control everyone that's there. >> seen that in >> and we've seen that in all the marches they've been to the marches that they've been to date therefore can't date and therefore we can't guarantee to guarantee it's going to be peaceful saturday sunday peaceful on saturday and sunday and the organisers and therefore if the organisers can't that, if they can't guarantee that, if they wanted show some decorum to wanted to show some decorum to the country and to some the country and to get some respect for the legitimate peaceful marches on behalf of the palestinian people , they the palestinian people, they would cancel it this would then cancel it this weekend no, we're going weekend and say no, we're going to recognise the that we've to recognise the fact that we've got freedom to march in our got the freedom to march in our country because these people have laid down lives for have laid down their lives for us to be allowed to do that. so

we're to step back and we're going to step back and respect them on the two days that they're asking for respect and we'll carry on our our and then we'll carry on our our peaceful protests in the future that will help not just the pubuc that will help not just the public opinion, it will help the police at a very difficult time. >> shahab khan, final thoughts, briefly, if you can. >> i mean, to be honest, i don't think that's a particularly logical point to make. so these people died and fought for us. they laid down lives for they laid down their lives for our now we have those our freedoms. now we have those freedoms let's them up freedoms. so let's give them up just a few disruptive just because a few disruptive elements hijack plan. elements might hijack this plan. i don't agree with that. i i just don't agree with that. i think that very day we think that is the very day we need to be out there showing support for peace, calling for an calling for an armistice, calling for a ceasefire. that is exactly the day. and that anyone day. and anything that anyone should other day should be doing, any other day shouldn't allowed. if shouldn't be allowed. then if the police feels has to step shouldn't be allowed. then if thestepce feels has to step shouldn't be allowed. then if thestep in,feels has to step shouldn't be allowed. then if thestep in, ifels has to step shouldn't be allowed. then if thestep in, if the has to step shouldn't be allowed. then if the step in, if the government in, step in, if the government feels has to ban it, ban it, feels it has to ban it, ban it, but only only when it reaches but only if only when it reaches that point. and now, i would that point. and for now, i would expect not reached that expect it's not reached that point. and that's why the government hasn't it. government hasn't banned it. >> fascinating >> gentlemen, a fascinating

debate. >> gentlemen, a fascinating delyour time. human rights for your time. human rights lawyer and ex colonel philip ingram. well folks, what do you think? mark gbviews@gbnews.com ruth has emailed in and says, my heart is with the victims of the horrible war in israel, in gaza, but our veterans need this day and should be stopped , and the march should be stopped, chris we should stop the chris says. we should stop the march. it's so disrespectful and frankly, it's dangerous to let it go ahead. paul says. of course not. marches and protests are of democracy for are part of the democracy for which people lost their which these people lost their lives. police should have lives. the police should have the resources to the necessary resources to handle situations like this. and your verdict is in the results of the poll are now live of 85% of the poll are now live of 85% of you agree that the government should ban marches on armistice day 15% say they should not. coming up with a slimmed down king's speech is rishi sunak plotting a surprise may election 7 plotting a surprise may election ? and is that what the country needs ? i'll be asking the leader needs? i'll be asking the leader of reform uk richard tice who's live in the studio shortly. but first in a sensational twist to royal snub, gates , an almighty

royal snub, gates, an almighty pubuc royal snub, gates, an almighty public row, has broken out between the palace and the sussexes , with harry and meghan sussexes, with harry and meghan insisting that king charles did not invite them to his 75th birthday bash . plus, they're not birthday bash. plus, they're not ianed birthday bash. plus, they're not invited for christmas. royal insider angela levin offers her stinging analysis on harry and meghan's latest fallout with the king. and that's

isabel, monday to thursdays from six till 930 . gb news star and

six till 930. gb news star and leader of reform uk richard tice, coming up with rumours of an earlier than expected election in may of next year. >> is that what britain needs? but first, it's time for fearless journalist and leading royal biographer angela levin. and there's been another dramatic twist to royal snub gate with an almighty public row breaking out between buckingham palace and the duke and duchess of sussex. after the sunday times reported that the pair turned down an invite to the king's 75th birthday bash. the sussexes have sensationally hit back. sussexes have sensationally hit back . a spokesperson for the back. a spokesperson for the couple has said there has been no contact regarding an invitation to his majesty's upcoming birthday. it's disappointing. the sunday times has misreported this story. crumbs. i wonder if they they're going to sue the sunday times anyway . a source close to the anyway. a source close to the pair told the mail online considering the trip to kenya didn't go well, this might be a welcome distraction for now. gb news also understands that harry and meghan haven't received an

invite to spend christmas with the rest of the royals, so angela levin, who to believe ? angela levin, who to believe? >> well, i wouldn't believe harry and meghan. we've got an unknown unnamed person saying all sorts of things we can't believe a word of it. i mean, we're so used to them twisting things . but we're so used to them twisting things. but also the sunday times is a very respectable paper and the royal head of that is also very careful and well respected. so no, i don't believe that i'm sure she's right and they're wrong . but i right and they're wrong. but i think it was just a trick. if somebody doesn't invite you to something and or they said they've invited you, not going and you don't want to go, then you just shut up, don't you? you don't have to make that in a great bonfire of anger and say, you know, they're wrong. this is wrong. it's outrage . rageous why wrong. it's outrage. rageous why just be quiet. it shows that they're actually reading the

press very , very carefully. they press very, very carefully. they say they're not out, but they obviously are to come back with this bonfire very quickly afterwards . it's a nonsense. and afterwards. it's a nonsense. and actually, i think it's quite right for king charles not to invite them . what i suggest he invite them. what i suggest he said is that, you know, if you want to come, the door is open. he's done that a great deal. but he's not going to go through all the problem. and i don't think harry and meghan are going to go. meghan can't bear this country anyway. but we'll go unless they apologise . unless unless they apologise. unless his father and william apologise to meghan, but what? they need to meghan, but what? they need to apologise to her for nobody knows but his daughter. and not to give in at all. and so all this nonsense, childlike behaviour is just actually to put their names in the paper. >> i just wonder if the couple are relishing this drama because victimhood is their currency. >> yes , they are victims. now, >> yes, they are victims. now, the interesting part,

millionaire victims . yes. millionaire. >> anonymous. california mansion. yes. >> with royal titles . >> with royal titles. >> with royal titles. >> 16. >> 16. >> 16. >> 16 bathrooms. >> 16 bathrooms. >> yes . >> yes. >> yes. >> which one of them is incontinent, i wonder? >> i don't know. i don't know. i wouldn't ask . but the wouldn't ask. but the interesting thing is that meghan was told by her new agent that she's got to be happy, she's got to be jolly. no more being a victim because people are fed up with it. they're not interested in including in america. >> they don't like that, particularly in america. >> and so i think that she's passing all this on when she's not saying it, but it's coming through. and that could lead us on to scobie, who's done this awful book. >> well, indeed. let's let's talk about that, because this is quite a story. and this is of course, the sussexes biographer , course, the sussexes biographer, omid scobie, a close friend of the couple, is preparing to release his new book end game, which promises to be nothing less than explosive. scobie will brand the king as unpopular and

prince william as a power hungry heir whilst portraying harry as the prince forced to start a new life after being betrayed by his own family. so this there's also there's camilla there for a queen willing to go to dangerous lengths to, prison , serve her image. >> now , all that is not true. i >> now, all that is not true. i mean, the king is very popular. he was popular from the moment the queen died. there were thousands of people around buckingham palace which astonished him. he was very popular when he went to germany and to france and in africa. he hasn't put a foot wrong so far. no, he hasn't put a foot wrong so far. and so he is very popular . and to talk about that, popular. and to talk about that, about william , harry knows when about william, harry knows when he was young, he didn't want to be a king. but now he's accepted his responsibility and he's working really hard on it. i think it's very spiteful . no, think it's very spiteful. no, but my view on this one is that that meghan has been told, as i

just said, not to moan , so she just said, not to moan, so she can't actually get ahead with her memoirs, which was going to be full of yet how badly she was treated. so she's got old scobie to do it for her. if you remember back to the other book he wrote about, she said she had nothing to do with it, nothing at all. and then she ended up in court apologising, saying she forgot that that she told the aide could actually talk to him. and tell him lots of things. so this one is going to be exactly the same. um, full of lies, full of unkindness , full of of unkindness, full of spitefulness, which is going to hurt them just before christmas . hurt them just before christmas. and i think that they can not get it out of their system, that they actually live your life. no one's stopping them with their life and get on with it. >> so it's worth pointing out that we have no evidence that the sussexes spoke to omid scobie in relation to either of his books, but of course that is your view and it is my view, yes. briefly, on the flip side, are this couple not being

treated badly? harry and meghan, they've been hounded out of the country. move to country. they've had to move to america they're still america and they're still getting the press, getting dissed by the press, including i. including you and i. >> that's because they've >> well, that's because they've become unpleasant. they're so become so unpleasant. they're so nasty, they're so awful about things . and also they're i call things. and also they're i call them eco hypocrites because they're going so many times in private planes and yet they're telling us that we absolutely must not do that. harry set up this travel, travel list, which which is when you go away, you're very careful where you go and how you go. and you don't use planes and all that. and he's the patron of that. and he's the patron of that. and he's just doing absolutely the opposite of what he's telling us to do. >> i'm offended by the suggestion meghan made omid suggestion meghan made by omid scobie this book that our scobie in this book that our next king, king william, who's a wonderful ambassador for the country, is somehow power hungry. how can he be power hungry. how can he be power hungry ? he's going to be king. hungry? he's going to be king. >> he's got the power already. yes. >> i mean, have you noticed any power hungry traits william? power hungry traits by william? >> work very hard,

>> i've seen him work very hard, but empire builder? no but is he an empire builder? no he's a very happy man. now, with a happy family and wants to do what actually his father wants as well. they have very similar connections. >> speaking of similar briefly, he's in singapore for the earthshot awards , which is a big earthshot awards, which is a big eco event. are you worried that prince william is now doing the eco bidding for his own father ? eco bidding for his own father? >> i think that he probably doing a bit because he believes what his father believes in. it's not doing that because he's just trying to please his father. they both agree on this. they've had many, many conversations about it. does he really think that or is he just trying to keep dad happy? no, i think he really thinks that because he something very because he wanted something very important but also important to do. but i also think he's showing how lazy harry is because harry was talking about, you harry is because harry was talking about , you know, we harry is because harry was talking about, you know, we must be very careful about all, you know, the weather and all that, but he's doing nothing at all about it. so william can actually show him up . if you

actually show him up. if you look at the two brothers, you see one is not making it and the other is working very hard and putting a lot of effort into things. >> well, i do like william, but i'm slightly worried he's becoming the greta thunberg of the royal family. but listen , the royal family. but listen, we'll there and we look we'll leave it there and we look forward very forward to catching up very soon. fact, thank you for soon. in fact, thank you for joining me on my show on sunday night for the last word 1045. night for the last word at 1045. it's the last word with it's always the last word with the brilliant angela levin. thank as thank you, angela. coming up, as it's a former hamas it's revealed, a former hamas chief is among those organising marches armistice day. marches on armistice day. there's surprise. there's a surprise. are well—meaning protesters, the terror , useful idiots? my terror groups, useful idiots? my panel debate that shortly. but next with a slimmed down king's speech is rishi sunak plotting a surprise rise may election and is that what the country needs? i'll be asking the leader of reform uk richard tice live in the studio. plus, if richard tice was prime minister, how would he be handling pro—palestine protests ? that's .

next all round, superstar nana akua. later tonight. but it's time now for gb news presenter and leader of reform uk, richard tice . and of reform uk, richard tice. and as we discussed, rishi sunak offered very little in the king's speech today as the government set out its priorities ahead of the next general election. just 21 laws were announced and the slimmed down speech has set tongues wagging among senior labour figures that the pm could be plotting an early election in may. the other mooted dates are october next year or they could string it out and hang on for dear life until january 2025. god forbid . richard, would you god forbid. richard, would you like to see an early election may 20th, 24? yeah. >> look, my view is mark, that frankly, this government has run out of road. it's run out of ideas as you've got a slimmed down king's speech, no one believes anything anyway. i mean, percentage those mean, what percentage of those bills, frankly , are going to bills, frankly, are going to actually be i would

actually be passed? i would suggest look, the suggest very little. look, the country of this lot. country is tired of this lot. the country wants is frankly a change of direction, wants to be properly run and yeah, bring it on. we're ready whenever the election is called, reform is ready. is there a better date for you? >> i mean, would october be better? give you time to rally the troops? >> we will be ready. and those leaflets printed whenever it is . leaflets printed whenever it is. okay. printed as okay. they're being printed as we . mark, don't we speak. mark, don't worry about candidate are about that candidate are absolutely chomping at the bit . absolutely chomping at the bit. we're at campaign events so it's almost as though it says like a it's a maximum 12 month countdown. but if it's six months, bring on. months, great. bring it on. >> think i think sooner >> i think so. i think sooner rather than later. why you rather than later. why do you think rishi has gone think old, dishy rishi has gone for potentially, because it for may? potentially, because it was a very, very abbreviated agenda today. people are agenda today. so people are thinking be may. do thinking it could be may. why do you sunak's gone for that date? >> i'm not saying that he is going to go that date. >> i'm not saying that he is going to go that date. going to go for that date. i mean, people wouldn't want going to go for that date. i mean, people wouldn't want mean, most people wouldn't want to give up voluntarily. you know, position in know, his powerful position in the he's going to know, his powerful position in the why he's going to know, his powerful position in the why would he's going to know, his powerful position in the why would he'sthat? to know, his powerful position in the why would he's that? six lose. why would you do that? six months but i think the

months early? but i think the country wants him to go early. and may be that events force and it may be that events force him early. but as i say, him to go early. but as i say, what do you mean by that? >> events force to go? >> would events force him to go? i just think that never underestimate the power of events add pressure to a events to add pressure to a failing government and so anything could happen . anything could happen. >> but let's bring it on. let's get it done. let's change course. we've just got to move forward. we've got to get towards proportional representation. all these great opportunities that we campaign for. i want them done as soon as possible. >> now, i think we can agree that your friend and colleague, nigel farage helped boris johnson win the last election. i think boris owes nigel farage a great debt, as we all do, because he kept jeremy corbyn out of number 10. >> as i'm aware, boris has never actually said thank you. wouldn't surprise me. >> you but listen, do >> there you go. but listen, do you know what? take that up you know what? i'll take that up with the gb news with boris in the gb news canteen. absolutely right. when he in for a cup of he when he pops in for a cup of tea. but listen, so we can all agree that influenced the agree that nigel influenced the outcome i think you

outcome of 2019. i think you could kingmaker or could be kingmaker in six or 8 or 10 months time. i take it you'll do the same at and support rishi sunak absolutely not. >> don't be ridiculous to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer suggests to keep keir starmer out of number 10. i don't like socialism and they are both sides of the same socialist coin. high tax, high regulation , nanny state, pro net regulation, nanny state, pro net zero. that all equals low growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunakis growth. no rishi sunak rishi sunak is just diluted net zero. he's wiggled and wobbled around because he knows the pressure that i'm putting on him. the country does not want net zero. it wants growth. it wants action. it wants to stop the boats. it wants net zero immigration. that's what we stand for. and i promise you, no deals. i'm on the record. mark yeah. even if they offered me £5 million and a peerage, the answer is still no. yeah, well, that's because you don't need the you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> you're absolutely. >> because i'm man of >> no, it's because i'm a man of principle and conviction that once and you are. once change and you are. >> i've actually always >> and i've actually always said, even going back to my old talk radio that are talk radio show, that you are a significant and powerful figure

that influence some that will have influence at some point. going to point. and i think it's going to be rather than i be sooner rather than later. i honestly believe on heart honestly believe hand on heart that have the power to keep that you have the power to keep keir starmer out of number 10. why keir starmer out of number 10. wh'we want as many, many of my >> we want as many, many of my viewers would rejoice at that. the point about democracy you the point about democracy is you can of starmer. can stop. change of starmer. look, the tories should look, frankly, the tories should stand aside. as we stood aside in 2019, the tories should do the right thing. they've had their chance. they've blown it. they should stand aside, head to head starmer against me . i win. head starmer against me. i win. >> would you do a deal with rishi? rishi? >> even if it involves just said, how many times do i need to no? to say no? >> what if it involved? i don't take for an answer. what if take no for an answer. what if it involved? take no for an answer. what if involved answer. what if it involved a deal pr? on proportional deal on pr? on proportional representation? look the answer is deal with is i'm not doing a deal with the prime because . prime minister because. >> because we need to. we need an election and we need to get rid them. an election and we need to get rid so them. an election and we need to get rid so your. an election and we need to get rid so you think you can beat >> so you think you can beat starmer yourself? how does that work? if which have you work? if which seats have you got eye on? got your eye on? >> as many as possible. look,

it's very clear. we stood down in over 300 seats at the last election. we gave the tories an 80 seat majority. they had their chance and they've blown it . chance and they've blown it. they messed they've broken. they messed up. they've broken. >> have colossal >> you're going to have colossal influence, because influence, i believe, because i'm sick of getting emails from people me that the sun people telling me that the sun shines your backside , shines out of your backside, okay? that they feel okay? and that they feel politically homeless. and i think reform the think that reform uk is the obvious for people who are obvious home for people who are politically on the politically homeless on both the left and the right. >> well, we're going up in the polls and that's because we've got we've common sense policies. >> going to have colossal >> you're going to have colossal influence, i don't influence, but no power. i don't think you'll win any seats. but you can decide who our next prime is. we need prime minister is. we need proportional to proportional and i want you to choose that every vote counts choose so that every vote counts equally, country wants equally, mark the country wants pr, would pr, okay, well, what would happen tories said let's happen if the tories said let's have before this general have pr before this general election? >> that be interesting. >> that would be interesting. now listen, i quite fancy pr because that every because it does mean that every vote it? because it does mean that every voti it it? because it does mean that every voti it does, it? because it does mean that every voti it does, absolutely.’ because it does mean that every voti it does, absolutely. what i'm >> it does, absolutely. what i'm worried about. >> you know what happen? >> do you know what will happen? 3 more people will vote 3 million more people will vote in election. yeah, because. in the election. yeah, because. >> there's reason to vote. >> the average turnout is 10%

higher the uk. higher than in the uk. >> don't mind that. the only >> i don't mind that. the only thing that worries me is you could have a centre left coalition rest of time. coalition for the rest of time. does not weigh on your mind? >> not at all, no. the left parties it stitched up. parties have it all stitched up. >> snp. i believe in lib >> labour snp. i believe in lib dem greens. >> if the right come >> if the right people come forward with the right policies then they will be able shape then they will be able to shape and influence be involved in and influence and be involved in governing country. and influence and be involved in gov ifning country. and influence and be involved in gov if you country. and influence and be involved in gov if you were country. and influence and be involved in gov if you were prime ountry. and influence and be involved in gov if you were prime minister >> if you were prime minister and never, how would and never say never, how would you pro—palestinian you handle the pro—palestinian protesters, this protesters, particularly this weekend? that tension between the right to protest? >> exactly. i'll tell you exactly. >> and respect for the war dead. >> and respect for the war dead. >> have the right to >> you have the right to protest. you have the protest. you do not have the right to incite hatred, anti—semitism or violence. i call out before the 1st call this out before the 1st march. i said, that's what will happen. saw it. march. i said, that's what will happen. saw it . and that's happen. i saw it. and that's exactly happened. i am exactly what's happened. i am furious about what's happened . furious about what's happened. we've complete vacuum of we've seen a complete vacuum of leadership from the prime minister, from the leader, sorry, from the metropolitan police commissioner, and where you've got a vacuum, chaos reigns . this you've got a vacuum, chaos reigns. this march should be banned purely on that basis. and

as well as the fact that these people , they have no respect for people, they have no respect for our culture, our way of life , our culture, our way of life, the importance, the vast, vast majority do. >> would you accept the vast majority? >> no. if you went to the majority of those marchers, they would condemn hamas as a would not condemn hamas as a terrorist organisation . terrorist organisation. charleton who committed vile atrocities . they wouldn't do it. atrocities. they wouldn't do it. and that shows that actually who they are. they're hamas supporters. they're anti—semitic and they hate the jews. >> you can't you can't just label everybody on those marches i >>i -- >> i said, what percentage would you percentage? you say a big percentage? i worry a worrying number. ask them. go and ask them. i'll tell you what, it is awful. it's vile. it's appalling. you see some of what some of the chants, some of what some of the chants, some of what some of the chants, some of the signs. it makes me utterly, utterly furious . and i utterly, utterly furious. and i and share your leadership has and i share your leadership has allowed happen in this allowed that to happen in this country. i do your anger, country. i do share your anger, but think it's worth pointing but i think it's worth pointing out that many march in peace. >> i think it's important to >> and i think it's important to put context. put that in context. >> tell you what, why don't >> i'll tell you what, why don't they then say, let's call for they then say, let's call for the return of the hostages? why

don't hamas? think the return of the hostages? why don't do, hamas? think the return of the hostages? why don't do, but hamas? think the return of the hostages? why don't do, but hoheigs? think the return of the hostages? why don't do, but none of? think the return of the hostages? why don't do, but none of them nk the return of the hostages? why don't do, but none of them do. some do, but none of them do. none them do, mark? none of them do, mark? >> not too many placards , >> no, not too many placards, but i'm sure that's the sentiment of some. but look, you're entitled view you're entitled to your view because the because this is gb news, the home diverse opinion in only home of diverse opinion in only a seconds left is a couple of seconds left is religious now here religious extremism. now here to stay? i'm really worried stay? because i'm really worried what's happening every weekend? >> but that's why >> i hope not. but that's why leadership is so important. we've. allowed to we've. they have allowed this to bubble surface and it's bubble up and surface and it's very news. bubble up and surface and it's very jewels. bubble up and surface and it's very jewel in the crown of gb >> the jewel in the crown of gb news tice. thank you so news richard tice. thank you so much. forward catching much. look forward to catching up your reaction to up very soon. your reaction to what had say. mark at what richard had to say. mark at gb there you go, gb news.com. there you go, folks. lots to sink our teeth into, but we've got lots more to come as he announces a flurry of new gas licences is new oil and gas licences is rishi sunak right to drill baby , rishi sunak right to drill baby, drill. i'm happy, but not all of my pundits are head of policy at net zero. watch harry wilkinson will make the case for britain's fossil fuel future against climate campaigner and journalist donna mccarthy very shortly . but next, as it's shortly. but next, as it's revealed, a former hamas chief

is among those organising marches on armistice day. there's a surprise. our well—meaning protest as the terror group's useful idiots. well—meaning protest as the terror group's useful idiots . my terror group's useful idiots. my panel debate that in just a couple of minutes. see you soon. >> hello again. very good evening to you. it's alex burkill here with your latest gb news weather forecast. whilst tonight we'll get off to a bit of a chilly start. wind and rain is push its way in is going to push its way in later lifting temperatures. is going to push its way in late in ifting temperatures. is going to push its way in latein associationemperatures. is going to push its way in latein association withratures. is going to push its way in latein association with a:ures. it's in association with a frontal system that's pushing its way in from the atlantic. this will sweep its way eastwards as we go into wednesday. but ahead of that, we have skies many have clear skies across many places. clear places. and under these clear skies, taking a bit skies, temperatures taking a bit of dip during the start of the of a dip during the start of the night. and some mist and as night. and some mist and fog as possible before the wind and rain its way in we go rain pushes its way in as we go through the night. wind through the night. that wind and rain to lift our rain is going to lift our temperatures. by the time temperatures. so by the time many of us wake up on wednesday morning, too morning, it shouldn't too be chilly. through chilly. as we go through wednesday itself. then wet and wednesday itself. then a wet and windy start many places. windy start across many places. the be pretty heavy, the rain could be pretty heavy, particularly across parts of scotland. north west england.

but through fairly but it pushes through fairly quickly, the east quickly, except in the east southeast here, the rain is going to linger well into the afternoon behind it, something dry brighter , but also dry and brighter, but also a heavy showers likely across western parts of scotland and northern ireland. in the north, temperatures staying single temperatures staying in single figures some milder further figures for some milder further south, around 13 or 14 south, highs of around 13 or 14 celsius. plenty of showers to come as we go through thursday, particularly in western places where exposed to the where you're exposed to the blustery winds. also some heavy showers in the south and southeast , possible showers in the south and southeast, possible more eastern north eastern parts likely to stay dry with some decent bright, weather here. bright, sunny weather here. further showers to come as we go through they are through friday, but they are going gradually with going to gradually ease with saturday. looking saturday. at the moment looking largely

by it's 10:00 i'm mark by it's10:00 i'm mark dolan and this is gb news tonight bombshell revelations officially unked bombshell revelations officially linked saturday's pro—palestine march on armistice day to hamas.

>> a saying that he is links half of >> a expose links half of the six groups organised and organising the rally. controversial of course, involved with that terror group, including a man accused of masterminding hamas terror attack us. he now lives in a nonh attack us. he now lives in a north london council house. of course he does. so are well meaning protesters planning to take to the streets of london this saturday simply, hamas is useful idiots . that's the this saturday simply, hamas is useful idiots. that's the big debate next with tonight's top panel this evening, esther mcvey , derek lord and rebecca reid . , derek lord and rebecca reid. also tonight, as suella braverman is accused of goading rishi sunak into sacking her. so that she can launch her bid to become tory leader with the straight talking home secretary make a better pm. my panel returned with their take on the simmering tory civil war later. meanwhile in springfield . meanwhile in springfield. >> whoa, that's quite a grip. >> whoa, that's quite a grip. >> see marge strangling the boy has paid off. >> just kidding . i don't do that >> just kidding. i don't do that anymore. times have changed.

>> producers of the iconic comedy cartoon the simpsons have announced that homer the father will no longer choke his son. bart because times have changed. so too, is the woke mind virus determined to strangle all the fun out of life . gb news fun out of life. gb news superstar and nana akua is uncancelled. she's with us shortly to discuss that and as he announces a flurry of new oil and gas licences is rishi sunak right to drill, baby, drill now head of policy at net zero. watch harry wilkinson will make the case for britain's fossil fuel future against climate campaigner and journalist donoher mccarthy . let me tell donoher mccarthy. let me tell you, sparks will fly. also, i'll be nominating my new greatest britain and union jack before the night is out and tomorrow's front pages. but first, the news headunes front pages. but first, the news headlines and polly middlehurst. >> mark, thank you. good evening to you. well, the labour leader has today criticised the first

king's speech to parliament in 70 years by saying the only fight left in the government is the fight for their own skin. earlier, king charles outlined the prime minister's legislative agenda for the year amid traditional pomp and pageantry. the speech includes measures on tougher sentencing for murderers and a ban on leaseholds for new houses in england and wales. sir keir starmer said the conservatives were severing britain's future , but rishi britain's future, but rishi sunak hit back , saying the new sunak hit back, saying the new measures will change the country for the better . well the foreign for the better. well the foreign office has said tonight that more british nationals have crossed the border into egypt from gaza via the rafah crossing, adding that uk teams continued to provide consular support to victims wishing to flee the violence. this comes as ministers held a cobra meeting in downing street to discuss the israel—hamas conflict and its impact on the uk. israel—hamas conflict and its impact on the uk . meanwhile, impact on the uk. meanwhile, today marks a month since the

october the 7th. hamas terror attack on israel. so hundreds of people gathered outside downing street to hold a memorial vigil for those who've died in the conflict . but meanwhile , the conflict. but meanwhile, the government is saying it will carefully consider any application by police to prevent protests planned for remembrance weekend . and the metropolitan weekend. and the metropolitan police is asking organisers to urgently reconsider marches planned for london this weekend because of the police's assessment of the risk of violence . but the violence. but the pro—palestinian coalition are refusing to cancel the march . refusing to cancel the march. police could request it's banned if there's a threat of serious pubuc if there's a threat of serious public disorder there. but met police chief sir mark rowley said the police will do all it can to protect. remember events. the remember events will not be disturbed . disturbed. >> whatever protests or events go on, we will do our utmost to protect those because they are so critical. people shouldn't be

in fear that those are going to be compromised and we will do everything possible to make sure they're not. the second point about though , there about protests, though, there will be a protest this weekend. parliament's very clear about that. parliament's very clear about that . the law provides hides no that. the law provides hides no mechanism to ban a gathering, a static protest, a rally, anything like that. smart rowley speaking there. >> now, prince harry has delivered a special message of hope to military veterans in the united states attending an event in new york, the duke of sussex's video message was played at the 17th annual stand up played at the 17th annual stand up for heroes event at the lincoln centre yesterday . the lincoln centre yesterday. the prince cracked a few jokes, but also spoke more seriously about what he described as the hugely important closeness of the military community. prince harry is a patron of the invictus games , a sports tournament games, a sports tournament uniquely for injured servicemen and women. this is gb news across the uk on tv , in your

across the uk on tv, in your car, on digital radio, and on your smart speaker by saying play your smart speaker by saying play gb news. this is britain's news channel . my thanks to polly news channel. my thanks to polly middlehurst who returns in an hours middlehurst who returns in an hour's time. >> tomorrow's news tonight in our media buzz. we kick off our media buzz. and we kick off with a first look at the front pages. with a first look at the front pages . and it's almost like they pages. and it's almost like they were watching the show and listening to the big opinion because charles, his state debut, say the metro is the king's speech historic day . yet king's speech historic day. yet sunak plans just more of the same . the i newspaper braverman same. the i newspaper braverman split with number 10 on tents as tories accuse her of leadership bid. suella braverman suggested that for some sleeping rough in tents is a lifestyle choice. it seems she doesn't have the full support of her boss and will discuss that later in the show . discuss that later in the show. so my brilliant pundits are back tonight. former cabinet minister and gb news presenter esther

mcvey mp quite sparkling tonight by anchor and visiting professor derek lord and author and journalist rebecca reid. now revelations have exposed bombshell connections between terror group hamas and organisers of this weekend's controversial pro—palestine rally on armistice day. one of hamas's former terror chiefs , hamas's former terror chiefs, mohamed suella, is founder of the muslim association of britain, or the mab. one of six groups behind saturday's event, which cops have begged organisers to cancel. israeli authorities claim his son, obada suella, is now the mab's vice president. so all came to the uk on a relative's passport in the 1990s and was given citizenship in the early 2000. he's accused of running hamas's terrorist operation on the west bank and plotting atrocities in israel. charming well, suella now lives in a north london council house, which he recently bought at a knockdown price under the uk's right to buy scheme . it comes as

right to buy scheme. it comes as the daily telegraph reports that half of the group's organising saturday's march have links to hamas. so esther, what do you think about this ? think about this? >> as in which. >> as in which. >> yeah, i mean, first of all pointed out quite a few points, so correct. correct. i mean, the bottom line is i just think it reduces the authority of these marches even further. if know marches even further. if we know that there figures helping that there are figures helping organise are connected organise them who are connected to . to terror. >> yeah. mean, i thought and >> yeah. i mean, i thought and i've been working this through , i've been working this through, who would want to go on this march? why would you want to go on this march? what reaction are you trying to do? what triggering are you trying to do? you're talking about of you're talking about some of them might well—meaning, but them might be well—meaning, but i'm you? well, i'm thinking, are you? well, meaning so much the meaning it means so much to the british people. why would you do something inflame something that could inflame a situation? so when you're saying there could be some there there could be some people there who meaning, well, i'm who are well meaning, well, i'm wondering who there's quite a big presumption. wondering who there's quite a big presuare:ion. wondering who there's quite a big presuare they wondering who there's quite a big presu are they the wondering who there's quite a big presuare they the people wondering who there's quite a big presu are they the people who >> well, are they the people who are about children, are worried about children, women, dying in gaza and

women, men dying in gaza and then i looked and if you were well meaning and if you were worried about that, you'd say, well, hang on a sec. >> today isn't the day is what i'm thinking. you'd say today. i want make that. it's a fair want to make that. it's a fair point to raise. i want to make an on but you know an issue on it. but you know what? today isn't the and what? today isn't the day. and then i looked as you rightly pointed out, who are the people organising these protests? well, like the like you say, 50% of the organisers are linked to serious groups that have got considerable links to hamas. so they're not well meaning either they're not well meaning either they are extreme people taking to the streets . and so i'm to the streets. and so i'm looking at what is the make up of those people and it does not bode well. >> well, yes . i bode well. >> well, yes. i mean, bode well. >> well, yes . i mean, derek, >> well, yes. i mean, derek, you've got the chanting, haven't you, calling for a jihad, calling for an intifada, which basically means suicide bombs in restaurants and on buses . you've restaurants and on buses. you've got calls for a holy war, anti semitic chanting. and now proven links to hamas. semitic chanting. and now proven links to hamas . these marches links to hamas. these marches have got to stop. well yes and ho. [10. >> no.

>> look, 29% of those people polled in this country don't know whether or not hamas is a terrorist organisation, probably because they watch the bbc and if you're between the ages of 18 and 24, the figure goes up to 49. so there is a significant problem. secondly, i think i must say very strongly that at the united kingdom isn't a satellite of israel. we are a democratic country with our own laws and people are entitled to march whether we like it or whether we don't. that's why people actually went to war because they didn't want to live under a totalitarian regime . and under a totalitarian regime. and thatis under a totalitarian regime. and that is actually worth defending , particularly on armistice day. i don't like hamas and it's right to say, however, that there are two wings to hamas . there are two wings to hamas. one is the proscribed organisation because of its terrorist activities and the other is a political organisation which is entirely legal. so we want to be absolutely sure that we're targeting the right people when we are very, very opposed to them having the right to demonstrate on armistice day. >> well, i just wonder whether

these marches now have no moral authority. >> rebecca i think two things. so there's a march called the march for life, which is an anti—abortion march, and i find the existence of it abhorrent. i hate it, i hate it. but i still believe that it should absolutely happen. and try to absolutely happen. and i try to think about every single time i want a march should not happen. but what about when it's saying that i like or i think that i care about? and i think we have to accept that however much you hate a cause, they have the right to do it and you to right to do it and you have to try and put yourself in the position of if it was the thing i care about, would i want it cancelled? i think you have cancelled? i also think you have to to remember and i realise to try to remember and i realise this going go well this isn't going to go down well as to say. the people as a thing to say. the people who watched news are who watched gb news are generally speaking, people who appreciate armistice day, who care day, care about remembrance day, for whom big of their whom it's a big part of their culture, often a lot of links to the military cetera. et cetera. there of people in this there are lots of people in this country not it, country for whom that's not it, especially you are younger country for whom that's not it, espeyouly you are younger country for whom that's not it, espeyou have'ou are younger country for whom that's not it, espeyou have nevers younger country for whom that's not it, espeyou have never met nger country for whom that's not it, espeyou have never met somebody and you have never met somebody and you have never met somebody and them. different and shame on them. different people have different value

systems, would lot systems, i would imagine. a lot of which is the problem. it's not a problem. you are allowed to should value to feel everybody should value our everybody our war dead and everybody should up. should respect what's coming up. wilfred very wilfred owen would be very pleased are people pleased that there are people who had to be who have never had to be troubled by the idea of a war. the of a war is that the success of a war is that there is a generation of young people who don't understand how horrific of course horrific it was, and of course you it. and always do. you respect it. and i always do. the minute silence. i don't the two minute silence. i don't wear a poppy. do the two wear a poppy. i do do the two minute silence. i respect it, but i don't have to agree with it and i don't have to take part in it. >> but why? generation >> but why? a generation hasn't had go to war is because had to go to war is because a generation or more did go to war. but we to their war. but we have to give their lives time, one at a lives one at a time, one at a time. >> and that's why it means a lot to so many people. >> and there has been very current wars that we've got people who've lost their lives and in way or and have come back in one way or another mental trauma or another with mental trauma or disfigured. feel disfigured. so i feel that actually should remember actually we should remember this because we're not having to do actually we should remember this beiande we're not having to do actually we should remember this beiand somebody having to do actually we should remember this beiand somebody havi laid» do it. and somebody else laid the lifetime. think that it's lifetime. i also think that it's such an important day. i believe in freedom of expression,

freedom freedom of freedom of speech, freedom of it. sometimes i think this it. but sometimes i think this is so important. know is so important. do you know what for the last what you've marched for the last couple weeks? you've couple of weeks? you've protested for a couple of weeks. couple of weeks? you've prot cand for a couple of weeks. couple of weeks? you've prot cand fcita couple of weeks. couple of weeks? you've prot cand fcit next|ple of weeks. couple of weeks? you've prot can d fcit next week. weeks. couple of weeks? you've prot can d fcit next week. iveeks. couple of weeks? you've prot cand fcit next week. i think you can do it next week. i think our tolerance, rebecca, now being used against you cannot start somebody start saying when somebody can feel not. start saying when somebody can feeithis not. start saying when somebody can feeithis is not. start saying when somebody can feeithis is not not. start saying when somebody can feeithis is not nidesigned to >> this is not even designed to be the centre, but the be around the centre, but the timing is disrespectful. no the war now, people. and war is going on now, people. and also just to clarify, sorry, i think a terrorist think hamas is a terrorist organisation. disgusted organisation. i am disgusted and i believe in it. >> you'll never get a gig at the bbc. >> however, say that. >> however, don't say that. that's dream. however however that's my dream. however however much hamas , i still much i hate hamas, i still believe that i don't care about the timing. the second you start saying you protest on this saying you can protest on this day, not on this day. you can protest about that. you've lost freedom of speech. >> okay, derek. >> okay, derek. >> but ironically, it would seem to that you're going to to me that if you're going to march at to march march at to all march on armistice day would actually send a very strong message to the free world that people actually fought for people's right to demonstrate . wait, the

right to demonstrate. wait, the people's right to think what they want to think and to think that we have a right to ban that on the very day that people should be remembered dead for dying for other people's right to continue to all those on the right guilty of double standards, free speech until they don't like what they're hearing. >> you know and like i've said, you can march on every other day. i said, this is such a sensitive issue, and i'll tell you for why. let's look at the practicalities of it. so there will be 1600 police or something. that's there. and yet people were calling for tens of thousands to come down. you're going to upset people. you're to going to upset people. you're to going raise tensions and there won't be enough people to be able to control and curtail. and those who were extreme of which we've all agreed there could be some extreme people there deliberately pressing the trigger upsetting trigger points and upsetting a nation. no, no. now nation. i say, no, no, no. now is not the time. it's supposed to upset people. >> that's why you have frozen. this very similar to when the this is very similar to when the sarah everard vigil happened and they no, no, you

they were all like, no, no, you can't it. it's going to get can't have it. it's going to get it's going to get nasty. it's going to get upsetting. oh, no. that was completely badly handled. >> agree with that was >> i agree with you. that was badly handled. stop. but badly handled. full stop. but why why we in why can't why can't we live in a society where people get upset? well, people do. and that's even have with this it? have a problem with this is it? >> time limited >> perhaps it's not time limited the to offend people, i the ability to offend people, i think. >> and i would never said >> and i would never have said this. we've been such a this. i think we've been such a tolerant nation. i say, tolerant nation. like i say, like jujitsu it's being like a jujitsu move. it's being used against us and used against us now. and sometimes have respect sometimes you have to respect other goes in other people. tolerance goes in around you cannot be around circle and you cannot be intolerant others. intolerant to others. >> my final point this is >> so my final point on this is that know, last month the that you know, last month the prime minister and the home secretary were telling the nafion secretary were telling the nation this wasn't a racist nation that this wasn't a racist country. other country. now, every other day they're worried about they're sort of worried about anti—semitic either is anti—semitic ism. it either is or it isn't. >> i'm glad that antisemitism . >> i'm glad that antisemitism. seriously. absolutely. i'd like to applied across the board. >> okay. well, look, a fascinating debate. let me know your thoughts at gbnews.com. let me of emails in me tell you a flood of emails in response to my interview with richard the of richard tice, the leader of reform uk. of them very, reform uk. 99% of them very, very positive. they'd like him

to minister well, to be prime minister well, never say coming up , to be prime minister well, never say coming up, as say never, but coming up, as suella braverman is accused of goading sacking goading rishi sunak into sacking her so that she can launch her own bid to become tory leader. with the straight talking home secretary. make a better pm. my panel returned to give their take on the simmering tory civil war shortly, but next, as rishi sunak announces a flurry of new oil and gas licences is he right to drill, baby, drill head of policy at net zero? watch harry wilkinson will make the case for britain's fossil fuel future and he'll be debating climate campaigner and top journalist donna mccarthy . let me tell you, donna mccarthy. let me tell you, it's going to be incredible debate. so what do you think, margaret gb news dot will discuss that .

gb news, the people's channel, britain's news channel . britain's news channel. >> should the authorities stop the pro—palestine marches this weekend? well, feelings are running high, getting so many emails. this from dave. dear mark, good evening . why do some mark, good evening. why do some people not understand that we should have the right to pay our respects to our war dead without being disturbed by the palestinian ? keep those palestinian marchers? keep those emails coming. they're they're a very, very busy tonight. but rishi sunak zack has set out his priorities for the year. and in today's king's speech, of course, read by king charles 111 one of them couldn't be clearer. the drill, baby, drill . the pm the drill, baby, drill. the pm announced a flurry of new oil

and gas licences , whilst keir and gas licences, whilst keir starmer says he would end north sea exploration . even as it sea exploration. even as it stands, he's yet to u—turn on this particular pledge. but never say never . so there is now never say never. so there is now clear blue water between the tories and labour. but which party has the right approach to debate this? i'm delighted to welcome the head of policy at net zero. watch harry wilkinson and the director of climate media coalition, donna mccarthy . media coalition, donna mccarthy. i'll start with you, harry. is rishi sunak right to drill baby , rishi sunak right to drill baby, drill ? drill? >> absolutely. >> absolutely. >> i mean, no one is questioning the fact that we will still need huge amounts of oil and gas in the future regardless of which trajectory you look at. so this is a question of do we want that oil and gas to come from the uk, from our own waters supporting british jobs ? let's remember british jobs? let's remember hundreds of thousands of people rely on this industry for their livelihoods . so if people are livelihoods. so if people are saying that we should cut that off, they have to explain to those people who will lose their

jobs, lose their way of supporting their families why they should just be sacrificed . they should just be sacrificed. >> well, indeed, donna mccarthy , >> well, indeed, donna mccarthy, great to have you on the show . great to have you on the show. so just a few months ago , the so just a few months ago, the licences became available for bidding by the government for wind power. no takers from the private sector. that tells you everything you need to know . everything you need to know. these renewables are not a sound investment . investment. >> know what actually happened in that round? >> mark, as you well know, is that the government refused to pay a that the government refused to pay a fair price for the for the energy provided the government didn't subsidise them to the extent that they wanted. >> if this energy was reliable, you wouldn't have to subsidise it at all. mark, the it is not subsidised . subsidised. >> what they were saying is that guaranteeing guaranteeing their income , that's socialism . income, that's socialism. >> and so what socialism is, is what happened last winter, which was £60 billion made, paid to the funders of harry wilkinson's

net zero. >> watch the oil industry is absolutely, massively subsidised in this country. £60 billion mark of our money went to fund the oil companies last winter because of the oil crisis. what happened today with rishi sunak is an act of national self—harm because what it does is invests in an industry that keeps us addicted global oil prices, addicted to global oil prices, whereas what we need to be doing is actually investing in british renewable energy, which is the cheapest form of electricity on the market now. and what we need to be doing is margaret thatcher said very clearly that climate change an insidious danger. change is an insidious danger. it is one of the greatest challenges of the 20th century and we must act and what we should be doing is investing in renewable energy, insulate and bringing down bills for people's homes storage . homes and storage. >> harry wilkinson if the private sector won't invest, it's a crap investment . what it's a crap investment. what margaret thatcher said when she realised how it had gone into pumping up this alarmism using

fear as a weapon to bring about state control . state control. >> and she realised that this movement had gone so too far. people like .uk seem to think that the reason why people use oil is just a conspiracy by the oil is just a conspiracy by the oil companies to pump oil into the market. no, this is led by the market. no, this is led by the demand side of the equation. this is because people need to heat their homes. this is because people need to drive to work. they want to keep the lights on. they're not just burning oil for the sake of it. and to reduce our and we're going to reduce our demand for fossil by having electric vehicles that actually want to buy rather than the government saying, we're going to force you to buy them. that actually having heat pumps that people wanted to use rather than having government banning having the government banning gas know, this gas boilers. you know, this should be driven by demand. it should be driven by demand. it should be driven by demand. it should be driven by consumers. if driven by the state if it's driven by the state saying this is what you're going to lump it or leave it, then to do, lump it or leave it, then consumers are going to be left hugely worse off. they're going to poorer, they're going to

to be poorer, they're going to be colder. you know, if we restrict fossil harry, restrict fossil fuel. harry, harry, let harry finish your point. >> harry, if we if we restrict fossil fuels, supply of energy, what happens is prices will be higher than they would otherwise . okay? and then inflation goes up . we don't want that donoher up. we don't want that donoher we've just got inflation down. >> no, absolutely we don't want inflation. we want cheaper energy. and what actually the government itself admits that no matter how much you get cheaper energy with less energy, you get cheaper energy. we've got a choice, mark. we're going to invest billions in new energy, whether it's oil or renewables on the market. at the moment, which is the cheaper it's renewables . so why should we renewables. so why should we invest billions in a more invest invest billions in a more invest in the more expensive energy that british public doesn't that the british public doesn't want us to invest in? yesterday, opinion polling by yougov said very clearly the british public believes the government is acting too on climate acting too slowly on climate change. they understand, and by a margin of 10 to 1, they know that drilling in north sea oil will not bring down prices and

they actually want us to invest in and actually when in renewables. and actually when harry about the oil harry talks about the oil industry, well, let me tell you very clearly, the oil industry scientists in the 1980s told their bosses very clearly that if they continued promoting fossil fuels, it would cause major economic consequences by the 19 by the 2030 and global catastrophe by the 2060s. there predictions by the oil industry scientists are coming true right now . and what they did instead now. and what they did instead was they invest in groups like harry to mislead the public, to take us down the wrong route and to damage the british economy . to damage the british economy. let me very clear, mark, you you hear about inflation. you rightly care about inflation. you are you may be too young , you are you may be too young, but i'm not too. remember the oil crisis of the 1970s? if the middle east crisis explodes as it could do in the next couple of weeks and the oil in oil companies in the gulf put an oil

embargo , we're looking at embargo, we're looking at a price of $150 per barrel, which would be absolutely catastrophic . and so what we need to be doing is to protect britain's economy and move to renewables. that removes us from that danger of being exposed to the global oil market funded by harry. >> all right, harry, do you want to respond to that? >> absolutely. we have never taken a penny from energy companies. it's a complete lie that donica insists on saying every the reality is that every time the reality is that donica do you take it back ? donica do you take it back? >> do you take back that slur, that libel on your on your colleagues? harry no , no, no, ho. 110. >> no. >> what i meant to say, harry is spreading this lie every time. >> but this is, this is about consumers losing. >> harry let me deal with this situation. >> donohoe do you retract that untruth, that unparliamentary language that you've been using in the direction of harry wilkins , an i will draw the day. wilkins, an i will draw the day. >> harry wilkinson declares who his donors are. he will refuses. for the last 20 years they have been funded by international

global fossil fuel industry interests. and if they declare their interest, i will withdraw it . it. >> okay, well, look, harry, i'll. i'll let you and donohoe debate this on a future occasion, but what is your response to the argument of donohoe that actually if we go for green renewables, we will have energy security, so we're not reliant on russia or saudi arabia ? arabia? >> well, this is about it, actually. who is we in this situation ? tanaka wants to use situation? tanaka wants to use the state to force his preferred technology on the public. there's no comparing fossil fuels and reliable power stations like nuclear power as well, and gas power stations with technologies that supply energy only when the wind is blowing or the sun is shining. a modern industrial economy like the uk needs energy whenever it's required. and so if we go with this approach, then we're going to have huge amounts of backup that's going to have to be fossil. so it's not even as green a technology as he makes

out either. this is a technology that's already cost consumers a lot when you look at european countries, the more they've adopted renewables, the higher their electricity prices have tended to be. so this myth that renewables are cheap is a complete lie. they require huge amounts of backup . they require amounts of backup. they require huge amounts of grid infrastructure. so we see costs rising and rising in countries that ignore the problem of reliable . we need reliable, reliable. we need reliable, affordable energy supplies. >> a fascinating debate now donelan. the clock is against us, but i want to give you the last word . can i just point out last word. can i just point out that one of the reasons why the government are going to grant oil and gas licences is in to order encourage these companies to invest in green renewables . to invest in green renewables. and don't have the and if they don't have the profit from oil gas in the profit from oil and gas in the sea , then they're not sea, then they're not incentivised to help us go green. that's the point. we're in partnership with these oil giants and you all just weren't going to punish them, basically. plus about example of plus what about the example of germany? have invested germany? who have invested billions renewables ? billions in green renewables? and when vladimir putin

and yet when vladimir putin invaded ukraine, they were reliant on his oil and gas brief answer if you can. >> the idea that the oil industry, what the government wants us to invest in in renewable energy, then it should reduce the taxes , is put on reduce the taxes, is put on renewable energy. and it has given a massive tax cut to the to the oil companies to invest in oil. what you're saying is absolutely the government is doing the opposite. what about germany ? if it wants the oil germany? if it wants the oil companies to invest in in in renewables, in the uk, then it should make a level playing field. >> all right. look a great debate, gentlemen. this show is the home of diverse opinion and we've certainly heard it. you've both been very articulate and very respectful. my thanks to henry wilkinson and donnacha mccarthy . gentlemen, i we mccarthy. gentlemen, i hope we get speak again soon. but get to speak again soon. but coming up in uncanceled producers of the iconic comedy cartoon simpsons cartoon the simpsons have announced homer will no announced that dad homer will no longer choke his little son bart, because times have changed. so is the woke mind virus determined to strangle all fun out life ? gb news is

fun out of life? gb news is superstar nana akua is uncanceled shortly , but next in uncanceled shortly, but next in the media buzz suella braverman is accused of goading rishi sunak into sacking her so that she launch her own she can launch her own leadership bid. would the straight talking home secretary be better pm? will debate that

because we've given up reporting crime in my view. >> but go on, go . on >> but go on, go. on >>— >> but go on, go. on >> more front pages have been delivered . we start with the sun delivered. we start with the sun newspaper exclusive . back after newspaper exclusive. back after 11 years. girls again an that's girls allowed to reunite with a single dedicated to their former band mate, the late great sarah harding daily express moving last wish of bbc's george alagiah read out at his memorial. very sad news that he's passed away and may he rest in peace. bounce back house pnces in peace. bounce back house prices to rise by 18% within five years. and sunak accuses starmer of plot to lock uk in eu

deal. starmer of plot to lock uk in eu deal . daily starmer of plot to lock uk in eu deal. daily mail starmer of plot to lock uk in eu deal . daily mail pray they don't deal. daily mail pray they don't end up with a riot at the cenotaph and why the meghan markle of devon and her earl are getting divorced . daily getting divorced. daily telegraph has mass fighter's last stand at hospital terrorist plant booby traps in nurseries as they scramble to halt israelis . is that from paul nuki israelis. is that from paul nuki in gaza reporting for the telegraph . driverless cars not telegraph. driverless cars not yet. driverless car users not liable for fatal crashes is the other story. and met chief says he cannot ban pro—palestine protest on armistice day. those are your front pages. let's get reaction to the big stories of the day with former cabinet minister and gb news star esther mcvey, banker and visiting professor derek lord and author and journalist rebecca reid . and journalist rebecca reid. now, suella braverman has been accused of goading her boss, rishi sunak , into giving her the rishi sunak, into giving her the boot. rishi sunak, into giving her the boot . according to colin bloom, boot. according to colin bloom, the government's former adviser on engagement at home

on faith engagement at home secretary suella braverman is after the sack. so she can launch her own tory leadership bid. here's just some moments where braverman has diverged from the party line. we must make sure that we don't go down the same route as some cities in the same route as some cities in the us, like san francisco or seattle, where living in a tent has become a lifestyle choice. >> is it offensive to say that living on the streets for a homeless person is a lifestyle choice in a tent? well, i don't want anyone to sleep rough on our streets. >> multiculturalism makes no demands of the incomer to integrate or it has failed. something that's incredible about our country is that it is about our country is that it is a fantastic multi—ethnic democracy. >> leicester so the family secretary is wrong. but i think i'll tell you what i'm saying is that our country has done an incredibly good job. >> derek is suella braverman after the top job? >> well, i suspect so . >> well, i suspect so. >> well, i suspect so. >> no, i don't think that she's a modest lady, although she's

got quite a lot to be modest about and ouch . i saw her today about and ouch. i saw her today looking heavily disguised as a human being sitting next to the prime minister. and if the conservative party don't get the message by now that we're fed up with having freaks as leaders of the conservative party, then they deserve to lose the next election . election. >> and would you consider rishi sunak to be a freak? no listen, you're probably torn on this . i you're probably torn on this. i would have thought, esther, because on the one hand, i've got no doubt you admire suella braverman. on the other hand, this all the optics of this has all the optics of a tory civil war, doesn't it? >> well, going back to because it's quite interesting, would you somebody sack you go to somebody to sack you if had visions of if you really had visions of being the leader? no, you wouldn't. not a great wouldn't. it's not a great platform to go forward to be leader. been sacked platform to go forward to be leader. you been sacked platform to go forward to be leader. you get een sacked platform to go forward to be leader. you get sacked ked platform to go forward to be leader. you get sacked because because you get sacked because you're not doing your job properly. you really did want properly. if you really did want to leader, what be to be leader, what you'd be doing is running mining on a principle. in principle. i don't believe in this. where we have a this. this is where we have a difference opinion. i'll go

difference of opinion. i'll go forward. actually think the forward. so i actually think the exact is the case. exact opposite is the case. i think she's feeling very vulnerable so that the vulnerable. so i think that the immigration hasn't been immigration problem hasn't been solved. so what she needs to do is, as she'd see it, shore up a base, a base on the right hand side of the party, a one which rishi can't naturally reach out to. so what she's saying is you can't get rid of me. there is a reshuffle coming forward and she's saying, i'm going to be quite out there. i've got this contingent i have to stay in. so i actually think the papers have got it wrong. and having been i actually think the papers have got it and 1g. and having been i actually think the papers have got it and seeing having been i actually think the papers have got it and seeing how ng been i actually think the papers have got it and seeing how it] been i actually think the papers have got it and seeing how it works , there and seeing how it works, i'm that's what it i'm telling you that's what it is feeling vulnerable. she is she's feeling vulnerable. she does not want the sack. >> what's analysis of >> what's your analysis of what suella is up to? suella braverman is up to? rebecca, i'm not sure what she's up to, but if i were arrested, i'd be sending her flowers every single week because she takes so much flak. >> like i cannot stand the woman. but my god, she gets punched gets and punched and she gets up and she's nothing meaner and she gets she gets up and gets punched and she gets up and she gets meaner. she's fairly ineffectual. she hasn't a ineffectual. she hasn't done a great to the boats. great deal to stop the boats. she things and

she just says mean things and she's a small of she's keeping a small number of very right wing people engaged with she's fighting. very right wing people engaged with suggestion;he's fighting. very right wing people engaged with suggestion that fighting. very right wing people engaged with suggestion that there ng. very right wing people engaged with suggestion that there are any suggestion that there are just sort mid—range , not just a sort of mid—range, not really right wing group and really very right wing group and she's a lot of she's deflecting a lot of attention . most of anger attention. most of the anger goes towards her. so she is the most useful thing. rishi has. if i were him, i'd be clinging to her. >> is she hurting the party? be honest with me, esther. is she a help or a hindrance? >> no, i don't think i think she's she can maybe say things she's she can maybe say things she doesn't always maybe say them in the most tactful way. i also don't think she's always quoted in entirety because i do know her and i've heard her. and she seems far more nuanced on things. but she does say things that people do think or are concerned about. and i saw alex chalk afterwards saying, oh, i read what she'd said. i was slightly startled , but actually slightly startled, but actually when i spoke to her, it wasn't i then heard it in round. so then heard it in the round. so as a politician, you've got to make though, people make sure, though, that people fully on board everything fully take on board everything you're trying to say. perhaps

she's not be a lie. >> she's not seeking the context, though, is she? because she the headline. context, though, is she? because she and he headline. context, though, is she? because she and 13 headline. context, though, is she? because she and i agree..ine. context, though, is she? because she and i agree. and that >> okay. and i agree. and that is a problem, i think, for a politician. >> would move her on if you >> would you move her on if you were rishi? >> no, i don't think. are you this a curiosity question. >> okay. wait rebecca, go on. >> okay. wait rebecca, go on. >> genuinely of >> just genuinely out of curiosity, you thought she curiosity, if you thought she was bad job, given was doing really bad job, given that kind of worked that you kind of worked together, you say it? or together, could you say it? or do to be like a little do you have to be like a little bit discreet? >> say that again? >> say that again? >> you you thought she was >> if you if you thought she was doing a really bad job, would you say, think you be allowed to say, i think she's or do you she's a nightmare? or do you have to be to as in as in. yeah as a backbencher, as a or as a prime minister as prime minister no, as a backbenchen prime minister no, as a backbencher. because. because prime minister no, as a bachorkher. because. because prime minister no, as a bachork together use. because prime minister no, as a bachork together sort because prime minister no, as a bachork together sort of. :ause you work together sort of. right. >> yeah. well, you would say to her, you would go forward and say this isn't good enough or can do that. absolutely. say this isn't good enough or can but do that. absolutely. say this isn't good enough or can but can that. absolutely. say this isn't good enough or can but can you. absolutely. say this isn't good enough or can but can you go jsolutely. say this isn't good enough or can but can you go )so|telly. say this isn't good enough or can but can you go )so|telly and >> but can you go on telly and say, she's doing say, i think she's doing a really job? if you wanted really bad job? if you wanted to, could you? >> people would. and yes, because you don't have collective responsibility. there's something >> there's something else. starmer believe in starmer doesn't even believe in collective responsibility. starmer doesn't even believe in collective rdon't. ;ibility. starmer doesn't even believe in collective rdon't. butty. starmer doesn't even believe in collective rdon't. but you say >> so you don't. but you can say things. you're meant to be honest. meant be

authentic. >> there's something else. when she stood for leadership she stood for the leadership of the party, she the conservative party, she got 27 that's not a power 27 votes. that's not a power base. fringe group. base. that's a fringe group. secondly, if you really secondly, i mean, if you really want win general elections, want to win general elections, you the you win basically from the centre and the leader of any political certainly political party, certainly since the war, there's always one pretty centre pretty much from the centre ground she is a very ground and she is a very divisive figure and i don't see her being electorally successful. and the concern lviv party are actually losing votes. they're not attracting. >> would you support her in a future general in a future leadership bid? >> what i'd say is it might have beenin >> what i'd say is it might have been in the past that you from the centre ground or what have you, but i think times are changing significantly. things are becoming far more polarised , are becoming far more polarised, things are becoming far more disrupted . and as you're seeing disrupted. and as you're seeing across the rest of europe , across the rest of europe, things are moving to the right. you that you might actually see that coming country too. so coming to this country too. so i think you get the right leader for time, but that's a for the right time, but that's a really that's a really really bad that's a really worrying, more polarised is w0 i'se. woi'se. >> worse. >> i actually the only world, >> i actually is the only world, but doesn't mean good. but that doesn't mean it's good. she's the person in

she's she's the only person in the whole of the tory party who i know anything about who i'd be genuinely frightened . miriam genuinely frightened. miriam cates. two. those are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two. those are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two two. those are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two that two. those are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two that i'd. those are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two that i'd be lose are genuinely frightened. miriam cateonly two that i'd be like,are the only two that i'd be like, should move changes? should i move changes? >> not calm should i move changes? >> tranquil. not calm should i move changes? >> tranquil. what not calm should i move changes? >> tranquil. what i'm calm should i move changes? >> tranquil. what i'm saying] should i move changes? >> tranquil. what i'm saying it and tranquil. what i'm saying it is, you you need sort of is, you know, you need sort of the opposite to balancing up . the opposite to balancing up. i'm i'm concerned at the moment there will be a backlash to what is going on. >> i centre ground when i say centre ground, i mean what mrs. thatcher move thatcher was able to do, move beyond . beyond. >> you say to my said derek. >> never said you went in >> she never said you went in the of the road, you went the middle of the road, you went midway, you get, you knocked midway, you get, you get knocked over lane and over there, you find a lane and deal with the issues. >> to a broader swathe that >> hill to a broader swathe that i saying but i hear what you're saying but you've personal about you've been quite personal about suella say she's suella braverman and say she's got to be about. got a lot to be modest about. >> what you say many >> what would you say to my many viewers listeners all viewers and listeners from all backgrounds who admire suella braverman that she's braverman and feel that she's a brave saying the brave politician, saying the things others won't? well i mean, i think that actually esther put her finger on something that was actually also significant . significant. >> is that often what she says might be right? but the way in which she says it is deeply

offensive live. okay. and that is her. >> but some people have said, oh , thank goodness she's allowed us to talk about that, which other politicians haven't allowed. could you conceivably support her as a future leader? >> could you rule that at >> could you rule that out at this esther this stage? esther >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't rule anything either. you've >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't rulet01ything either. you've >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't ruleto seeing either. you've >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't ruleto see which either. you've >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't ruleto see which eitithe you've >> no, i wouldn't i wouldn't ruleto see which eitithe world's got to see which way the world's going. but what i will say is i would not agree with anybody at going. but what i will say is i w0lmoment]ree with anybody at going. but what i will say is i wol moment trying th anybody at going. but what i will say is i wol moment trying to anybody at going. but what i will say is i wol moment trying to do 'body at the moment trying to do a leadership battle. the moment trying to do a lea that's» battle. the moment trying to do a lea that's the :tle. the moment trying to do a lea that's the last thing . >> that's the last thing. >> that's the last thing. >> there you go. well, look, she might leader. and who might become leader. and who knows, place knows, esther might get a place in . cabinet coming up, an in her. cabinet coming up, an influencer who's stupidly got her boyfriend's name tattooed on her boyfriend's name tattooed on her head has hit back at those who says she will regret it. but does her disastrous face ink make her the biggest dope of the day? find out as i crown tonight's greatest britain and union jackass. but next in uncanceled producers with the iconic comedy cartoon the simpsons have announced that dad homer be able to homer will no longer be able to choke his son because, choke his son bart, because, well , times have changed. well, times have changed. so it's the woke mind virus

determined to strangle all fun out of life. well let me tell you someone who's got plenty of fun. gb news superstar nana akua. she's up next, and she's going to let rip on the overly pc producers. see you .

in two. i in two. >>- in two. >> would suella braverman be a good prime minister >> with so many emails in support of the home secretary and just one that reflects the view of many and says good evening. mark suella is just saying what most people are thinking or wanting, so watch this space now for gb news superstar nana akua joins me in uncanceled and their father son joules have served up some of the most iconic scenes in cartoon history . the most iconic scenes in cartoon history. but the most iconic scenes in cartoon history . but now woke cartoon history. but now woke producers are sucking the life out of the iconic comedy series the simpsons. after homer , the the simpsons. after homer, the father announced on a recent

episode that he will no longer choke his son, bart . take choke his son, bart. take a listen. whoa whoa. >> that's quite a grip. >> that's quite a grip. >> see, marge strangling the boy has paid off. just kidding. i don't do that anymore. times have changed and comedy has died. >> so following the show's latest pc makeover , are we latest pc makeover, are we sucking the fun out of life? nana great to have you back. don't you want to strap all those woke tv producers instead? >> thank you . honestly, serious >> thank you. honestly, serious plea. i mean, look, when i grew up, it was tom and jerry and like, you know, and the woodpecker and all those things. and i'm pretty sure that there were plenty of episodes where the a hammer and the mouse got a hammer and smashed the cat the head. smashed the cat over the head. and, know , look, i didn't and, you know, look, i didn't turn to violent person. turn out to be a violent person. i it. it was cartoon . and i got it. it was a cartoon. and i got it. it was a cartoon. and i worked out the difference between reality and bit of between reality and a bit of fun. but bart simpson and this whole thing , this the simpsons

whole thing, this the simpsons isn't actually really targeted at very young people anyway. so i'm sure adults watching that whilst it does have a child like humour and appeal to young humour and does appeal to young people wasn't initial people that wasn't their initial audience the idea that audience and the idea that somebody seen that would somebody having seen that would think, a good idea . think, oh, that's a good idea. it's just comedy, just it's just comedy, it's just meant be funny. and if you're meant to be funny. and if you're an adult watching that, you probably kids probably wouldn't have your kids watching as an watching that anyway. but as an aduu watching that anyway. but as an adult watching that, you might you might know these photographs are funny. >> i mean , nana did no one tell >> i mean, nana did no one tell these numpties that they're not real human it's real human beings? it's a cartoon . cartoon. >> well, that's the point. they're not real people. they're just cartoon . somebody's drawn just cartoon. somebody's drawn it to make people laugh . all the it to make people laugh. all the things in there, none of the things in there, none of the things in there are likely to happen. they're parodies. it's a comedy. you're supposed to laugh, and if you don't like it, you can just press the button and change channels. don't and change channels. i don't know woke but, know why they've gone. woke but, you go go broke . you know, go woke, go broke. we've many times. we've seen it happen many times. definitely >> this story, i had >> when i read this story, i had one word dope . now, nana, if you one word dope. now, nana, if you thought bad . a nursery

thought that was bad. a nursery in germany is dropping in eastern germany is dropping the holocaust victim anne frank from its name to go for something, quote , more diverse. something, quote, more diverse. it will instead be called world explorers because parents and staff wanted something without a political background . and given political background. and given the flare up of anti semitism across europe, this feels problematic, doesn't it ? problematic, doesn't it? >> well, it does a bit . and in >> well, it does a bit. and in particular, i mean places like germany where, you know, this has a very chequered past with all of that, isn't it really hitler and their history ? i hitler and their history? i would have thought that in these times it might be wise to keep the name. and also anne frank was an absolute legend and kind of a hero of her time. so, you know , this is something that, know, this is something that, you know, when we hear about how resilient she was, the diaries and everything that she did, how she went through holocaust, she went through the holocaust, she went through the holocaust, she you know, it's something that actually what it was saying in that piece was that really what they should do is actually give a history give the parents a history lesson an education lesson

lesson and an education lesson on on who anne frank was and what happened to her, what exactly happened to her, because it's a sort of history that you never want to see repeated . but we seem to be repeated. but we seem to be seeing it happen now . i think seeing it happen now. i think even more than ever, we even now, more than ever, we need keep the reminder hours need to keep the reminder hours of things like that present so that we don't repeat them again. >> well, i just wonder whether it is about appeasing certain groups society because they groups in society because they did talk about how diverse german society is now in in a weird way that anne frank would somehow offend some families. i mean, this is a dark place to inhabit, isn't it? >> well, why would that offend somebody? so it's something that's placed on there to have a look at some of the history that's behind it and mean, of course, anne was hidden in an annexe, wasn't she ? and it was annexe, wasn't she? and it was a cleaner who eventually sort of, you know, got them out and told everybody where they were. but, you know, it was a story of how they it was an they survived. and it was an incredible journey well. incredible journey as well. and i think we like something with a historical context, a story and

a meaning to and what are a meaning to it. and what are they to call it, the they going to call it, the beyonce water. you know what i mean? a bit like putting mean? it's a bit like putting beyonce in a history book as something for the kids to study it feels a bit shallow. >> well, definitely . you're so >> well, definitely. you're so right. listen, the school right. and listen, the school have said that they just didn't want but want somebody political. but i don't think frank is don't think anne frank is political. she's an incredible human teenage girl that human being, a teenage girl that kept a diary whilst being pursued by the. was not pursued by the. she was not political. you are, though. nana your show is unmissable . you're your show is unmissable. you're absolutely knocking it out of the park every weekend and nana akua back on saturday at akua is back on saturday at three. see you then. nana >> see you then . >> see you then. >> see you then. >> brilliant stuff. time now for my pundits to reveal their greatest britain and union. jack and esther, who is your greatest? britain. >> well, i'm going to go for king charles today for the state opening of parliament. and not just because he wore that imperial state crown and because he read out the government's agenda. but the fact that did agenda. but the fact that he did it dead pan delivery, it in a dead pan delivery, talking about a climate climb

down, talking about the support for licencing of new oil and gas, fuel fields, and also about the rwanda policy, none of which he in. yet he delivered he believed in. yet he delivered it deadpan . it deadpan. >> there you go, derek. your greatest britain >> to be carnie wilson , >> it's got to be carnie wilson, who rescued the sheep nicknamed fiona that was trapped , i think fiona that was trapped, i think some were in ayrshire in scotland for nearly two years and he did what the rspca and other animal rescue organisations refused to do with the support of five other people. >> yes , he did a great job. >> yes, he did a great job. rebecca, your greatest britain minus is the producers of the simpsons for getting rid of the strangling. >> this is a show that's been running since before i was born and you don't stay on air and that funny that long without being incredibly astute about what and what what still works and what doesn't. then with doesn't. and then moving with the that's the the times. and that's why the why top. why they're still on top. >> okay , well, i'm going to give >> okay, well, i'm going to give it derek and cami wilson for it to derek and cami wilson for rescuing that lonely

rescuing that poor, lonely sheep. how about your union jackass? esther, who's who's grinding your gears tonight ? grinding your gears tonight? >> well, i'll tell you who. and that's prince harry. i could not believe it. there he was. he did not wear the coronation medal given to him by charles as he delivered what his his speech to the stand up for heroes. but even worse, he put this speech out online moments before his dad did the very first state opening of parliament. i thought how bitter and twisted of the sun have you got to be to try and outshine your father on his big day? >> well, that's harry derek, your union jackass >> it's an honorary one. and it has to be. >> and guy who , as you referred >> and guy who, as you referred to earlier , has had her to earlier, has had her boyfriend's name tattooed on her forehead. he's called kevin, not a nice name in my view. >> and it seems to me rather foolish thing to do because in all in all likelihood, i mean, she's likely to change her

boyfriend because she's still quite young. >> always change quite young. >:to always change quite young. >:to with always change quite young. >:to with a always change quite young. >:to with a alv10fs change it to keith with a bit of tipp—ex or karl, maybe that's the name of one of our lovely digital producers . listen, how digital producers. listen, how about your union, jack acas? rebecca mine is elon musk, but because they're apparently about to start actually doing neuralink or trials for neuralink, which is putting chips in people's brains and i admit that i am a neo luddite, but i'm sorry, this is very worrying and i don't think this goes to good places. it's got me worried as well, let me tell you. well decisions, decisions. who's i think who's it going to be? i think i'm to to i'm i'm going to give it to i'm going to give it to prince harry. yes, indeed. well done. for an excellent nomination, esther, because i do think he's behaved in very undignified behaved in a very undignified way . and the what about way. and by the way, what about that drama his not that drama with his brother not turning up to his father's 75th birthday? the world's gone mad . birthday? the world's gone mad. well, folks, can i thank my brilliant team the other side of the camera, most importantly , my the camera, most importantly, my excellent pundit tonight who have park. have knocked it out of the park. and at home listening on the and you at home listening on the radio as well . and you at home listening on the radio as well. i'm and you at home listening on the radio as well . i'm back for two

radio as well. i'm back for two more nights. then we have normal service resumed . i'll just be service resumed. i'll just be covering weekends after that from friday to sunday. but two more nights together and i'll see you tomorrow at nine. next up, it's headliners >> hello again. very good evening to you. it's alex burkill here with your latest gb news weather forecast. whilst tonight we'll get off to a bit of a chilly start. wind and rain is going to push its way in later lifting our temperatures. it's in association with a frontal system that's pushing its atlantic . its way in from the atlantic. this will sweep its way eastwards we go into eastwards as we go into wednesday. that, we wednesday. but ahead of that, we have across many have clear skies across many places . and under these clear places. and under these clear skies, temperatures taking a bit of during start of the of a dip during the start of the night and some mist and fog is possible wind and possible before the wind and rain its way in as we go rain pushes its way in as we go through the night, that wind and rain to our rain is going to lift our temperatures. time temperatures. so by the time many up on wednesday many of us wake up on wednesday morning, shouldn't too morning, it shouldn't be too chilly. through chilly. as we go through wednesday itself. a wet and wednesday itself. then a wet and windy start across many places. the rain could be pretty heavy, particularly parts of

particularly across parts of scotland, north—west england. particularly across parts of scotla pushes h—west england. particularly across parts of scotla pushes through england. particularly across parts of scotla pushes through fairly 1d. but it pushes through fairly quickly, except in the east, south—east here, the rain is going to linger well into the afternoon behind it, something dry brighter. but also a dry and brighter. but also a heavy showers likely across western parts of scotland and northern ireland. in the north, temperatures staying in single figures for some milder further south, of around 13 or 14 south, highs of around 13 or 14 celsius. plenty of showers to come as we go through thursday, particularly in western places where to the where you're exposed to the blustery also some heavy blustery winds. also some heavy showers in the south and southeast , possible showers in the south and southeast, possible more eastern north eastern parts likely to stay dry with decent stay dry with some decent bright, weather here. bright, sunny weather here. further showers come as go further showers to come as we go through friday, but they are going ease with going to gradually ease with saturday. at the moment looking largely by coming next largely dry by by coming next time on the dinosaur. >> our not only is cancel culture real but it's so bad we're going to be studying it in 100 years. >> and when you think about it, it's like really no one's allowed to question this but you white, white, heteronormative .

white, white, heteronorm ative. >> white, white, heteronormative. >> are you going to be problematic again ? problematic again? >> the dinosaur are with me . >> the dinosaur are with me. >> the dinosaur are with me. >> john cleese sundays at 9:00 on

gb news. >> good evening. the top story tonight, the labour leader has criticised the first king's speech to parliament in 70 years by saying the only fight left in

the government is the fight for their own skin. earlier, king charles outlined the prime minister's legislative agenda for the year amid traditional p°mp for the year amid traditional pomp and pageantry. the speech, including measures on tougher sentencing for murderers and a ban on leaseholds for new houses built in england and in wales. sir keir starmer said the conservatives were severing britain's future. but rishi sunak responded by saying the new measures will change the country for the better . country for the better. meanwhile tonight, the foreign office has said more british nationals have crossed the border into egypt from gaza via the rafah crossing, adding the uk teams continued to provide consular support to victims wishing to flee the violence. this comes as ministers held an emergency cobra meeting today to discuss the impact of the israel—hamas conflict on the uk today, marking a month since the october the 7th hamas terror attack on israel with hundreds of people gathering outside

downing