of no confidence in the pm.7 we are on of no confidence in the pm? we are on coming our way right after the headlines. we're polly . patrick. >> thank you. well, good evening to you. in a scathing letter following her sacking as home secretary yesterday, suella braverman has today accused the prime minister of having manifestly and repeatedly failed to deliver on key government policies . in a letter posted on policies. in a letter posted on social media this afternoon, ms braverman accused rishi sunak of betraying his promise to do whatever it takes to stop the small boat crossings by failing to override human rights. concerns about the rwanda plan. she also urged the prime minister to consider change changing course urgently accusing him of leading the conservative to record election defeats . as shadow minister for defeats. as shadow minister for international development, lisa nandy told gb news earlier the british public deserves better suella bravermans letter is just

the latest installed in a tory psychodrama that's been playing out over the last 13 years, holding the rest of the country to ransom . to ransom. >> while the tories fight among themselves . this reshuffle was themselves. this reshuffle was meant to be the moment when rishi sunak reset his leadership , when he signalled to the country that he stands for change. but with the return of david cameron and the ongoing row with suella braverman, i think all he served to do is just show that this is a tory government that is out of ideas, out energy . out of energy. >> lisa nandy speaking there. well, in news from well, in news away from politics, pharmaceutical politics, the pharmaceutical giant pfizer is planning to cut around 500 jobs at its site in kent. the plans will impact the site in sandwich , with site in sandwich, with operations set to continue with a different size . the company is a different size. the company is hoping to reduce running costs. the firm is also planning to bnng the firm is also planning to bring to an end its small molecule operations at the sandwich site , which overall sandwich site, which overall employs around 940 people.

application options have opened for britons to register their xl bully dogs for exemption before the breed is made illegal. owners who want to keep their dogs have to apply to an exemption scheme or choose to have their dog euthanized and apply for compensation . it will apply for compensation. it will be to illegal own an xl bully dog from the 1st of february next year. they must be registered by the end of january . health news and the government's considering making chickenpox vaccines available on the nhs following the recommendation of scientists . recommendation of scientists. the joint committee on vaccination and immunisation say the jab should be given to youngsters in two doses when they're 12 and 18 months old. it says data from other countries suggests the vaccine would dramatically reduce search, emulating instances of chickenpox and prevent most severe cases in children . now severe cases in children. now his majesty the king has been celebrating his 75th birthday today, and he's been chatting to

hundreds of nhs staff at buckingham palace this afternoon , he hosted a reception for 400 nurses and midwives to highlight their work over the decades. as their work over the decades. as the nhs celebrates its 75th anniversary, the king was also treated to a surprise performance of happy birthday , performance of happy birthday, sung by the nhs choir before he left. earlier, the monarch travelled to oxfordshire today to launch the coronation food project alongside queen camilla. he's hoping to bridge the gap between food waste and food need tv online dab+ radio and the tune—in app. this is gb news, britain's news channel . britain's news channel. >> well, suella braverman has thrown a huge bomb into downing street just a few hours ago. the former home secretary revealed her letter to the prime minister. and it's brutal . minister. and it's brutal. suella savage sunak. over the course of three explosive pages, the likes of which have never

really been before in really been seen before in british politics. someone needs to be honest, she says. your plan is not working. we have endured record election defeats. your have failed, your resets have failed, and we are of time . you are running out of time. you need to change course. urgent plea. but she goes further and tonight the prime minister stands accused of being a con man. she says as you know, i accepted your offer to serve as home secretary in october 2022 on certain conditions , as these on certain conditions, as these included, number one, reduce overall legal migration. number two, stopping the small boats, even if it means bypassing the echr. she goes on, i trusted you. it is generally agreed that my support was pivotal as a factor in winning the leadership contest and thus enabling you to become prime minister she thinks he lied. she thinks he's more interested in serving a foreign european court than the british people . she thinks he put people people. she thinks he put people in danger from extremists on our streets because he was too much of a coward to get tough on hate marches. but if you wanted more

evidence, then look no further than the manny's replace her with james cleverly, the guy whose support for strasbourg is so practically so extreme, he practically has a season ticket there and this is the crux of suella scathing takedown. and i quote, i can only surmise that this is because you have no appetite for doing what is necessary. she and therefore no real intention of fulfilling your pledge to the british people . so when sunak british people. so when sunak looks you in the eye and says this is control of our borders, i will not rest until the boats are stopped. >> we will pass new laws to stop small boats, to keep my promise to you to stop the boats and stop the boats . stop the boats. >> is he lying to us? all is he using the office of prime minister simply as a way of beefing up his cv? but he's not getting away with it. and tonight i can reveal brand new and exclusive polling data carried out for us by the best pollster in the business. it's matt goodwin, which shows, pollster in the business. it's matt goo other which shows, pollster in the business. it's matt goo other things, hows, pollster in the business. it's matt goo other things, a)ws, pollster in the business. it's matt goo other things, a majority

amongst other things, a majority of 2019 conservative voters didn't want braverman sacked. just 23% of tories strongly approve of bravermans sacking and just 11% of tories strongly approve of cameron coming back . approve of cameron coming back. finally, in a tell tale sign that it was braverman reading the public mood all along, more voters of all persuasions back the rwanda plan than oppose it. the decision on that, by the way , comes out from the supreme court tomorrow. that'll be tasty, won't it? sunak was the man who stuck the knife into bofis . man who stuck the knife into boris . that's what many boris johnson. that's what many people think. the knives people think. well, the knives are back out now, aren't they? and receiving and he's on the receiving end now, i get my panel's now, before i get my panel's unmissable reaction to another extraordinary british extraordinary day in british politics, bring in the politics, let me bring in the man for that man responsible for that bombshell polling i was revealing just a moment revealing to you just a moment ago . top pollster and academic ago. top pollster and academic matt goodwin. matt, thank you very, very much . now, look, very, very much. now, look, there's loads to go out here, okay? absolutely loads to go out pretty damning, though, your polls. i'm going to it polls. i'm going to throw it

over you sense that over to you in the sense that clearly and in terms of the clearly we and in terms of the tory voters who voted tory in 2019, didn't really want 2019, they didn't really want suella to and they do about rwanda. >> yeah . i mean, look, what >> yeah. i mean, look, what we're looking at, patrick, is a conservative party that i think is really adrift from the voters . it won in 2019 and needs to win back what we see is large majorities of them. they want that rwanda decision tomorrow to go their way. they want control of their own national borders. they're not impressed that rishi sunak dumped suella braverman . sunak dumped suella braverman. they're not impressed by the way that he brought back david cameron and here's the most revealing thing, patrick. here's the that stood out the thing that really stood out nationally. only 11% of people think the conservative party represents people like them that understands the concerns of ordinary working people . but ordinary working people. but among conservative voters , the among conservative voters, the party's own supporters , only 27% party's own supporters, only 27% think the conservative party understands their concerns. i mean, look, this is a party, patrick, that is completely and

utterly lost . utterly lost. >> indeed. and that is absolutely shocking, isn't it? and when you look at these decisions now to get rid of suella and to bring in david cameron, i mean, it has had absolutely no cut through with people at all. has it was it worth it , the conservative worth it, the conservative party, patrick, as you know, is still leagues behind the labour party in the polls. >> it's on about 19% in our poll today. >> it's on about 19% in our poll today . the labour party is today. the labour party is cruising to a majority . here's cruising to a majority. here's what's about to happen . the what's about to happen. the conservative party is going into an election defeat, but it's also going into a civil war. a filosofie , ethical, ideological, filosofie, ethical, ideological, civil war about what is conservatism and suella braverman has outlined her vision of what that is today. lower our migration, get tough on crime, deport foreign nationals who glorify terrorism , nationals who glorify terrorism, leave any institution or judicial agreement that prevents us from controlling our own

borders. so suella braverman patrick, this isn't just a pitch for the leadership. this is a rally cry for a completely different brand of conservatism and what your polling data both this time round exclusively for this time round exclusively for this show, which we're very, very grateful for. >> matt but also historically as well, shows that those kind of views have the support of more people than not, don't they ? people than not, don't they? >> well, i've consistent shown that suella positions on immigration and multiculturalism on how we should deal with hamas terrorists and their terrorists . terrorists and their terrorists. as we know, her views of police, her views of the institutions as patrick, these aren't just 51% positions. these are 65, 70% positions. these are 65, 70% positions. so you know, rishi sunak has tried to cover up this by appointing estimate a as a minister for woke and whatever for. but i think he's fundamental, for. but i think he's fundamental , totally gone wrong fundamental, totally gone wrong here because there's no frontline conservative now that is speaking loudly and clearly

to voters who want serious action on these issues. i'm sending this polling to number 10 tomorrow morning, patrick, and i'm going to say with that polling , if and i'm going to say with that polling, if you and i'm going to say with that polling , if you guys don't get polling, if you guys don't get back in touch with the 2019 conservative voters, your defeat is going to be more devastating than 1997. i mean, this is a sort of, you know, survival event for the conservative party on these kinds of numbers. and i don't really think rishi sunak gets it. patrick i just don't think he understands who's voting for the party and why they're voting for the party. >> yeah, absolutely. and look, matt , thank you very, very much matt, thank you very, very much again, for providing us with that exclusive make that exclusive content. make sure that you do check. mark goodwin. on twitter. he's goodwin. now on twitter. he's always got finger the always got his finger on the pulse substack as pulse there and on substack as well. a top pollster, top well. he's a top pollster, a top academic friend of the academic and top friend of the show as well. but let's get the thoughts of my panel, conservative mp for shipley and gb news very own philip davies. we've banker and visiting we've got banker and visiting professor darragh lord and author and journalist rebecca

reid. philip, i think i've got to start with you on this one. i'm afraid. look what suella has done here is say that rishi sunakis done here is say that rishi sunak is essentially a liar when it comes to wanting to sort out immigration. do you agree with that? no go on. >> no, look, i think suella has fallen victim of some people. do few, but some people do, which is that when they get sacked , is that when they get sacked, they have a hissy fit about it and start thrashing around. and i don't think it does any credit on her at all. and i say that as somebody who like suella who agrees with suella on virtually everything. but this not everything. but this is not a very to send. very edifying letter to send. and if all i would say is, and now if all i would say is, is that if suella felt so strongly about all of these things, didn't she resign things, why didn't she resign and letter ? i mean, and send this letter? i mean, she clinging to her she was there clinging on to her job. and this is now somebody whose bitter she's whose basic bitter because she's been . that's the that's been sacked. that's the that's the letter of somebody who's bitter been bitter because she's been sacked. letter of sacked. it's not the letter of person who's standing on a point of principle because she's stood on about on a point of principle about all things. she would all of these things. she would have and i don't have resigned. and i don't really, perfectly

really, to be perfectly honest, recognise that she recognise the things that she says the, the rwanda says anyway. the, the rwanda policy, was boris policy, which was boris johnson's policy. liz truss's policy is rishi sunak's policy was is suella braverman's policy is still the government's policy andifs is still the government's policy and it's nothing's changed. so i don't really see where she's going. >> well, well, it's the question as to whether or not he has the intention of seeing that through. she says that got through. she says that he's got no intention of leaving the echr, example. he knows that echr, for example. he knows that even through the even if it gets through the courts, under i'm courts, through under i'm talking that it's not talking about now, that it's not going be a swift situation, going to be a swift situation, that still be that people will still be subject to really lengthy appeals et cetera. appeals processes. et cetera. what does accuse him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek does accuse him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek is does accuse him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek is turningas accuse him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek is turning his ccuse him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek is turning his back him appeals processes. et cetera. widerek is turning his back on�*n of derek is turning his back on the people who voted for the tories in 2019 and the people who voted for brexit in 2016. well that's a very subjective view. >> i mean, i don't support that claim and i really agree with philip on this one. i think that the thing that strikes me as most strange about suella braverman is that you would be forgiven for not believing that

she's been home secretary for the last year. >> she is the lead minister who is supposed to be implementing the policy of the government on asylum seekers and control. she says. >> she says she couldn't do that. she says she was blocked from doing that. that she signed a contract with rishi sunak and he's reneged on it. >> my point, the contract is wasn't about the policy , wasn't about the policy, contract was about i imagine that the numbers that would get him across the line. so he became prime minister the point is that she is the lead minister in that department responsible for these policies on a day to day basis. if he has failed, so has she. >> okay. all right. i mean , one >> okay. all right. i mean, one of the other damning things, rebecca, in this and i think this really will not sit well with people at all, is on these hate okay. i'm hate marches. okay. and i'm sorry marches, sorry they are hate marches, right? was saying that he right? she was saying that he lacked the bottle to deal with this because it would have caused him political stink . caused him a political stink. and actually, in doing so, it put people on the

put ordinary people on the streets in danger of extremism. put ordinary people on the streits in danger of extremism. put ordinary people on the strei don'tianger of extremism. put ordinary people on the strei don't think' of extremism. put ordinary people on the strei don't think it'sextremism. put ordinary people on the strei don't think it's thatmism. >> i don't think it's that i think i think rishi think it's that. i think rishi sunak the right sunak still respects the right to and the right to to protest and the right to freedom of speech, which is something that we all universally agree with on this channel. >> not jihad, though. >> not jihad, though. >> wasn't jihad, was it? >> but it wasn't jihad, was it? the made the majority of the rest made were by far right were actually made by far right extremists who are not anything to the palestine to do with the palestine demonstrations. you're interesting. retrospective interesting. i am retrospective arrests, though, weren't it? >> but carry on. >> but carry on. >> so clarify. think the hamas >> so clarify. i think the hamas is terrorist organisation, is a terrorist organisation, ian, i believe in israel's ian, and i believe in israel's right exist. ifind ian, and i believe in israel's right exist. i find their right to exist. i find their demonstrations unpalatable. bill. cannot just bill. however, we cannot just ban because we don't like ban things because we don't like them think that suella them. and i think that suella was enjoying the tick box and the approval was getting the approval she was getting from demographic from a certain demographic of people calling hate people for calling them hate marchers. has history of marchers. she has a history of enjoying language marchers. she has a history of enjothat's language marchers. she has a history of enjothat's not language marchers. she has a history of enjothat's not good language marchers. she has a history of enjothat's not good politics.|age and that's not good politics. >> say you say a certain >> you say you say a certain demographic of people. philip i'll put it to you that most people agree with them. >> well, i agree with her policies. but as it happens, so does the government and so does rishi i mean, his policy rishi sunak. i mean, his policy on is the same as hers. on rwanda is the same as hers. and know about the european

and you know about the european court of human rights. i mean, first of all, there's two things. there isn't things. one, there isn't a majority in parliament to get rid of the to come out of the european court of human rights. so that's a red heavy. she couldn't get of couldn't get us out of the european rights. european court of human rights. if was prime minister. could if she was prime minister. could you though? you not ignore it, though? exactly. you can't ignore it is you not ignore it, though? exyou y. you can't ignore it is you not ignore it, though? exyouy.youignoring1ore it is you not ignore it, though? exyou y. you ignoring 1or1that; if you start ignoring it. that is country is exactly what the country ignores. it really the government ignored when the government ignored it when the echr agree with that. echr i didn't agree with that. echr i didn't agree with that. echr said there be votes echr said there should be votes for and i don't agree for prisoners, and i don't agree with the day with that either of the day which it which was labour ignored it because we knew it was a because we all knew it was a load nonsense. because we all knew it was a loa i nonsense. because we all knew it was a loai don't nonsense. because we all knew it was a loa i don't agreeense. because we all knew it was a loa i don't agree with >> i don't agree with that ehhen >> i don't agree with that either, but just to focus on derek, worth saying that derek, it's worth saying that the british government historically a ratio of historically loses by a ratio of 2 to 5 in the uk courts. >> the same number of times that it loses in the echr. >> okay, looks very quick . straw >> okay, looks very quick. straw poll. will we see more less of no confidence off the back of this, yes or no? no, no. >> no, no, no, because this is biased polling that doesn't necessarily reflect the actual biased polling that doesn't necethe'ily reflect the actual biased polling that doesn't necethe people act the actual biased polling that doesn't necethe people in the actual biased polling that doesn't necethe people in this actual biased polling that doesn't necethe people in this country way the people in this country feel biased polling what we the

way is being way that this is being reported is the of people is that the majority of people support not true. if support it. that's not true. if you you were to i'm asking you if you were to i'm asking you if you were to i'm asking you about massively. you if you were to i'm asking youlabout massively. you if you were to i'm asking youlabout rbut.ively. you if you were to i'm asking youlabout rbut we .y. you if you were to i'm asking youlabout rbut we haven't got >> i know. but we haven't got time into it. asking time to go into it. i'm asking about suella braverman letter. >> the reason >> and i'm saying the reason that it's not going create that it's not going to create that it's not going to create that doesn't have that is because he doesn't have the that it looks like the support that it looks like it does. look these it does. if you look at these numbers. interesting say. numbers. interesting i dare say. >> need to get out >> i think you need to get out a bit more. there we go. we're bit more. but there we go. we're off flyer. come back off to a flyer. we'll come back to we're off to a flyer. to that. we're off to a flyer. look an extraordinary thing to say. >> i agree with you. get out, get out, out more and meet get out, get out more and meet ordinary people and think that this absolutely this is absolutely spot on. >> right? gb news is >> right? okay. now, gb news is the for continuous the only place for continuous coverage on expert reaction to tomorrow's ruling coverage on expert reaction to torthe ow's ruling coverage on expert reaction to torthe government's ruling coverage on expert reaction to torthe government's rwanda.ing on the government's rwanda deportees plan. could on the government's rwanda de|a rtees plan. could on the government's rwanda de|a day; plan. could on the government's rwanda de|a day that plan. could on the government's rwanda de|a day that makes]. could on the government's rwanda de|a day that makes]. breaks be a day that makes or breaks rishi's premiership. been be a day that makes or breaks rishi' apremiership. been be a day that makes or breaks rishi' aprenof �*ship. been be a day that makes or breaks rishi' aprenof those been be a day that makes or breaks rishi' aprenof those recently. quite a few of those recently. there sure there wasn't there? so make sure that into gb news that you're tuned into gb news for the honest, full blooded coverage you won't coverage that you won't find anywhere mainstream anywhere else in the mainstream media. but coming up, as prince harry's his harry's lawyer claims that his drug use is private information, despite speaking about his despite speaking about it in his book where well does the book spare, where well does the privileged prince think that he's above the law ? royal scoop

he's above the law? royal scoop gets griffiths, gets a charlotte griffiths, editor at the mail on editor at large at the mail on sunday, gets teeth stuck sunday, gets her teeth stuck right into that. and the king's 75th birthday shortly. but up next in the clash after former minister andrea jenkins became the to hand in letter the first mp to hand in a letter . should there be a vote of no confidence prime confidence in the prime minister, herself joins minister, andrea herself joins me live in the studio alongside that chap you were just hearing about there, tory colleague philip davies . mp bit of blue philip davies. mp a bit of blue on blue action. that's .

weekend at 3 pm. on gb news, the people's channel, britain's

news channel . news channel. >> coming up is national treasure harry redknapp backing nigel farage on i'm a celebrity. the former football manager and the king of the jungle. he joins me shortly. but now it's time for the clash . well, man of the for the clash. well, man of the hour for some evil villain, for others, rishi sunaks shock reshuffle , which is quite reshuffle, which is quite difficult to say, is causing conflict in the party with suella braverman determined to have the last word earlier today , the former home secretary made this absolutely damning statement following her sacking. she reiterate, she said, just to reiterate, someone needs to be honest. your plan is not working. we've endured defeats , endured record election defeats, your resets have failed and we are time. you are running out of time. you need to change course urgently. but is scathing. letter but suella is scathing. letter does fall short of a no confidence motion. the same can't be said for dame andrea jenkins, who stuck her neck out to hand in the first no confidence letter telling me

exclusively on this show last night that she is fighting for her country . sorry, but what do her country. sorry, but what do you think ? should there be a you think? should there be a vote of no confidence in the prime minister? let me know your thoughts. email now, thoughts. email me now, vaiews@gbnews.uk . com or tweet vaiews@gbnews.uk. com or tweet me gb news. among you there. me at gb news. among you there. go to our poll. i'll bring you the results very, very shortly. well this, who better well to debate this, who better than two tories? it is dame andrea jenkins and philip davies as well. well andrea, i'll start with you on this. since we spoke last night , with you on this. since we spoke last night, do you seriously think that there should still be a mass vote of no confidence in rishi sunak well, i don't think it should be one on the floor of the house. >> you know, like what happened with boris and theresa may, where opposition it. where the opposition tabled it. i think you'll agree with that, won't it should won't you? i think it should be deau won't you? i think it should be dealt so dealt with by the party. so that's obviously a different vote confidence. would vote of no confidence. how would that go on? >> to everyone, >> just explain to everyone, what look like? what would that look like? >> well, so i so that >> well, so i mean, so that would going through the 1922 would be going through the 1922 where your in. where you put your letters in. i don't want see like we saw don't want to see like we saw you know, want to see

you know, i don't want to see the starmer and the smirks on keir starmer and his cabal's face by putting it on the of the house. a no on the floor of the house. a no confidence . but to me, i'd like confidence. but to me, i'd like to encourage more colleagues to put the letters in because i think enough is enough. disastrous by—election after a by—election and i think it'll get to that stage anyway to be honest. patrick, how long are the party going to keep haemorrhaging votes before the penny will drop? and that we've got to have a reset? >> all right, philip, i'll get you to respond to that, considering that your fair lady has just been made minister for woke or whatever it i'm woke or whatever it is, i'm assuming . assuming you disagree. >> do disagree. not >> well, i do disagree. not because mean, because of that. i mean, when esther minister under esther was a minister under david cameron's government, i voted against cameron's voted against david cameron's government more often than any other always had his own voice i >> frightfully m- >> frightfully things like that get but i do get in the way. but i do disagree andrew. it's very disagree with andrew. it's very rare. words rare. what i say, the words i disagree with andrew as she knows we agree with other knows we agree with each other on everything, but on virtually everything, but there's really. there's two reasons, really. i mean , one is think it just be mean, one is i think it just be generally absurd. anyway, we've changed three times changed leader three times already within the a year of a

general election . i mean, these general election. i mean, these leadership contests take months. i mean, it would be it would just absurd. and to be just be absurd. and to be honest, do that. but the honest, to do that. but the second mean, people second thing is, i mean, people treat second thing is, i mean, people over, we were 35 points ahead in the polls. and he's he's lost this lead. and he's and he's seen us fall behind . he took seen us fall behind. he took over an absolute shambles . we over an absolute shambles. we were 35 points down in the polls when he took over, but they didn't give liz truss. so he's actually been trying to restore some competence , some some competence, some credibility back to the government and actually he's edgedis government and actually he's edged is bit closer in hand. edged is a bit closer in hand. >> didn't give liz truss chance. so really the party to be fair and so i mean i disagree . and so i mean i disagree. >> is it absurd, andrea would it be absurd, absurd? >> no, because i mean, to me, look, i've wrestled with this and i've thought that my seat i think every conservative seat is back like labour was in 2019, isn't it? it's a fight for all of us, isn't it? isn't it, philip? and so i wrestled with it is the time right now. should

we wait? but to me, i'd rather is change leader now. yeah it probably mean it'll hasten the general election, but i'd rather change leader now get a strong leader in who can make decisions and is not afraid to be strong and is not afraid to be strong and rather than coming out with pr lines . pr lines. >> i've got to press you on who is that leader? >> i mean, in all honesty, it depends. you know, i speak my mind, but we don't know who's putting the name forward yet, do we? want somebody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, want somebody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, you want somebody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, you know,3nt somebody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, you know, our;omebody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, you know, our wing)ody from putting the name forward yet, do vium, you know, our wing)odthe)m , um, you know, our wing of the party. philip um , you know, the, party. philip um, you know, the, i mean , there's quite a lot of i mean, there's quite a lot of strong women. you're you're delayed is very strong. and she, i mean, is very strong as well, isn't she? okay, this there's several strong women and i mean, i don't care whether it's a bloke or woman, to be honest, but i just think what i'm looking for, patrick, as i said yesterday , is somebody with yesterday, is somebody with conviction and who's not afraid to put their head above the parapet and actually , what parapet and actually, what i think he has got conviction and

actually, you about it actually, if you think about it logically, a pr man, isn't logically, it's a pr man, isn't he, really? >> is running more >> rishi is running a far more conservative administration than bofis conservative administration than boris johnson ever did. i mean, bofis boris johnson ever did. i mean, boris talk, though? well, it's not just not delivering for not just not delivering on, for example, of the know, example, some of the you know, boris, obsessed with boris, boris was obsessed with all stuff. rishi all the net zero stuff. rishi has delayed for five has actually delayed for five years implementation. years the implementation. >> point i did agree >> that's one point i did agree with. mean, i pitched net zero with. i mean, i pitched net zero and he has done that. >> rishi was the person who reduced aid budget reduced the overseas aid budget from to 0.5% from nought point 7% to 0.5% when he chancellor of the when he was chancellor of the exchequer, which is something. >> behind the >> why are we behind in the polls then. >> why are we behind in the polwas en. >> why are we behind in the polwas was was doing that. well >> was was was doing that. well it frankly andrew, it doesn't really people like you really help when people like you know come on. taking pot know but come on. taking pot shots government he's his shots at the government he's his policy he's passed the do you think i'm i'm responsible for this? think i'm i'm responsible for thisno, not saying no. i'm >> no, i'm not saying no. i'm just 20 odd percent. >> no, i'm not saying no. i'm jus1120 odd percent. >> no, i'm not saying no. i'm justi thinkj percent. >> no, i'm not saying no. i'm justi think what ent. >> no, i'm not saying no. i'm justi think what i'm saying is if >> i think what i'm saying is if you out to people you pointed out to people actually that rishi actually the things that rishi has done, than has actually done, rather than we have this sort of cult worship boris, which no worship of boris, which bore no resemblance facts, resemblance to the facts, who actually the socialist actually led the most socialist administration my administration i've seen in my lifetime? boris was lifetime? you know, boris was all was a likeable,

all boris was a likeable, approachable . approachable. >> he election. >> he won election. >> he won election. >> might have been >> well, he might have been approachable, but he still ran a socialist rishi was socialist government. rishi was against the lockdowns. he tried to brought to stop them, brought them forward. rishi has been much more conservative things more conservative in the things that actually done than that he's actually done than somebody who andrea somebody like boris who andrea worships. ever did. >> andrew. >> go on, andrew. >> go on, andrew. >> boris is a friend. >> look, boris is a good friend. so is carrie. and defend so is carrie. and i will defend them loyal them . but them and stay loyal to them. but them and stay loyal to them. but the fact is, look, rishi is not cutting mean , when cutting through. i mean, when you see one of our by elections, someone resigned for, you know, alleged touching of children when we did better in that by—election, then we did under rishi by—election and that speaks volumes to me. rishi has got to go. we need a reset. we need to show to conservative values. but strong leadership . values. but strong leadership. you know, rishi just actually he'll go so far, but he won't actually deliver . and i he'll go so far, but he won't actually deliver. and i think what's telling with suella letter is the fact that she's said how many times she wrote to him and how many conversations they had . you know, she wouldn't they had. you know, she wouldn't write that if she couldn't back

it how didn't it up. and how he didn't respond. found very respond. and what i found very interesting about that letter, patrick, was the fact that she said that set these said that she set these agreements before taking on this position the echr, position about the echr, etcetera. and he rolled back on. >> i suppose it maybe is a choice of sticking with rishi sunak and limping on with a divided party towards the inevitable defeat or throwing the hail mary and getting someone else in. >> well, i mean , i'm not >> well, i mean, i'm not entirely sure who this person is who's miraculously who's going to miraculously unite party and deliver on unite the party and deliver on an agenda more an agenda which is more conservative than the one that rishi's actually presided over. >> want a leader who can >> we just want a leader who can connect to people is not connecting. well, i, i genuinely don't don't agree with that. >> and i think if people in the parliamentary in parliamentary party in particular, a duty particular, who have a duty to show bit leadership on show a bit of leadership on this, they actually highlight this, if they actually highlight the good things that he's doing, the good things that he's doing, the turning the the fact that he is turning the party more but also it's a party in a more but also it's a judgement well . judgement as well. >> judgement as well. i >> it's a judgement as well. i mean, , we can see storms mean, look, we can see storms are brewing. yeah, i might be causing one of these storms.

philip deny but philip i don't deny that. but what today? puts what does he do today? he puts out the least experience . people out the least experience. people in the whips office, a 2019 intake. i'm sorry , but it storms intake. i'm sorry, but it storms a brew and you put the old guard experienced people in there that's got to be the engine room. you know, to get legislation through. and it's things like that. and i just think just ridiculous. things like that. and i just thirhow just ridiculous. things like that. and i just thirhow just ryomlous. things like that. and i just thirhow just ryou respond to that >> how would you respond to that claim, really, that you know, to be fair, you i think it's been badly advised making things better by piping up about it. >> no, look, people said to me that about theresa may and look, we got a new leader and we won a massive majority . massive majority. >> i put a vote of no confidence in on theresa may though about theresa may we can we can i think we was plotting, won't we? >> we were plotting together. >> we were plotting together. >> certainly unite on that. >> certainly unite on that. >> we was going >> that was we was going secretly having conversations. >> that was we was going secretlhow1ing conversations. >> that was we was going secretlhow many)nversations. >> that was we was going secretlhow many have;ations. >> that was we was going secretlhow many have you ns. >> that was we was going secretlhow many have you got on right. how many have you got on your list? how many of you got on your list? i've i've thoroughly enjoyed this. >> thank you for coming on >> thank you both for coming on and speaking. so honestly and candidly. think it's

candidly. and i think it's a very visual audible very visual and audible representation tory representation of where the tory party moment. so i party is at at the moment. so i appreciate both coming appreciate you both coming for on that little point of agreement. we can agreement. at the end. we can all i'll get him put letter in. >> you watch this space. >> you watch this space. >> we all unite behind the idea that theresa may an absolute that theresa may is an absolute shocker. there we go. >> ipp of best friends >> ipp is one of my best friends in parliament. >> wow. we hopefully >> wow. there we go. hopefully it right? so who it stays that way. right? so who do you agree with after former cabinet minister andrea jenkyns became first hand in a became the first mp to hand in a letter? should there vote letter? should there be a vote of confidence the prime of no confidence in the prime minister? to the minister? let's go to the socials. lennox, formerly socials. jane lennox, formerly twitter, rishi twitter, says, i think rishi is getting unhappy getting desperate. i am unhappy that the old that he has brought in the old prime cameron prime minister cameron packed his left number when his bags and left number 10 when the went against the brexit vote went against him. a backward step and him. this is a backward step and it fare well my it won't fare well in my opinion. sacking suella was a mistake. for a couple mistake. got time for a couple more says yes, there more madeleines says yes, there should vote should be a no confidence vote in prime minister. this man in the prime minister. this man was not elected by the population, is actually was not elected by the porbyation, is actually was not elected by the porby his], is actually was not elected by the porby his own is actually was not elected by the porby his own membership,' was not elected by the porby his own membership, which all by his own membership, which is does is something that suella does mention. that mention. barry says if that happens, there would be mention. barry says if that probably coming at it from the labour side there and you know what? that's absolutely fair

enough. it is of course a democracy. so the all important poll, 89% of you think that there should be a vote of no confidence in the prime minister. not pretty reading that, is it? well, 11% of you say that there shouldn't be. right. proper clash . still to right. proper clash. still to come, how should we deal with child killers? i have my own ideas. james bulger's ideas. but james bulger's murderer, john venables, making a shameless parole bid that's tearing james's family apart. jeb nustar, nana akua is not going to hold back. and that's coming your way very, very soon. but next, how can prince harry demand privacy about drug use when he about his drug use when he boasted about his shenanigans in his memoir, spare his tell all memoir, spare editor at large at the mail on sunday, charlotte griffiths, she dissects the duke's latest sunday, charlotte griffiths, she dissects the duke's latest psychodrama and gives her analysis on the king's 75th birthday. don't move .

thursdays from six till 930 . thursdays from six till 930. >> football legend and former king of the jungle, harry redknapp comes later tonight. but first, us lawyers have spoken on the dukes of sussex's visa information, claiming that answers on historical drug use should be considered, quote, prime private personal information . so solicitors information. so solicitors acting on behalf of the department of homeland security made the intervention despite quite the pothead prince repeatedly referencing his drug

taking past in his own memoir, spare. take a listen to this. >> of course , i had been doing >> of course, i had been doing cocaine around this time at someone's country house during a shooting weekend . i'd been shooting weekend. i'd been offered a line and i'd done a few more since. it wasn't much fun and it didn't make me particularly happy as it seemed to make everyone around me . but to make everyone around me. but it did make me feel different, and that the main goal. feel and that was the main goal. feel different . different. >> i'm joined now by noel gardener , foreign policy analyst gardener, foreign policy analyst and director at the heritage foundation, which is the group fighting to make prince harry's visa application public. now, you want him deported from america. do you ? america. do you? >> well, patrick, thanks very much for having me on the show today. and i think the issue of transparency with regard to prince harry's immigration application is very important for the american people . for the american people. >> no one should be above the law. and it's very clear that everyone should be held to account in terms of drug use and

applying to the united states. and it's very clear, of course, that prince harry has admitted to widespread drug use in his memoir spare , and he should be memoir spare, and he should be treated like anybody else applying to the united states. and if it is revealed that he has lied on his immigration application , that he has misled application, that he has misled us officials , then of course, he us officials, then of course, he should be deported . we simply should be deported. we simply want to see the records released. we want to establish what the truth is. there is a clear public interest in the release of harry's immigration records . records. >> yeah , absolutely. all right, >> yeah, absolutely. all right, niall , i >> yeah, absolutely. all right, niall, i mean, the argument, i suppose, will be that if he does fail, he could just go to the southern border, wander in illegally and then stay indefinitely. but why does it matter so much to you really about this? because then he'll just come back here and it'll be our won't he ? our problem, won't he? >> well, i think it matters to the american people whether or not people lie on immigration applications . and i do think

applications. and i do think that the law should be applied. no one should receive a preferential treatment because of their celebrity status . and of their celebrity status. and at the heritage foundation , we at the heritage foundation, we believe in the enforcement of the rule of law and prince harry should receive the same level of scrutiny as everyone else. and this argument that he should be treated purely as a private citizen. of course , is complete citizen. of course, is complete nonsense. after all, he is a huge public figure in the united states, known to tens of millions of americans. he's done extensive media interviews. he should be held to account as a pubuc should be held to account as a public figure. >> yeah, he can't have a two tier policing system, even if you a prince now. thank you you are a prince now. thank you very there one very much. now gardner there one of men essentially of the men who is essentially trying to, roundabout way, trying to, in a roundabout way, get deported. now get prince harry deported. now i'm editor i'm joined now by editor at large the on sunday, large at the mail on sunday, charlotte charlotte, large at the mail on sunday, charlotte very charlotte, large at the mail on sunday, charlotte very cha|well, large at the mail on sunday, charlotte very cha|well as thank you very much. well as harry not sacrificed his right to privacy, can claim to privacy, how can you claim it's private matter when he's it's a private matter when he's earned millions earned potentially millions selling books audiobooks

selling books and audiobooks partly off the back of his drug use? >>i use? >> i think harry, as usual, hasn't really thought things through . through. >> so we know that he filled out his application in march 2020, and then at some point after prince philip's funeral, a year or so later , he then got very or so later, he then got very incensed by the fact that his family didn't understand why he went to america . so then he went to america. so then he decided to write spare . and then decided to write spare. and then dunng decided to write spare. and then during the process of writing spare, he somehow was persuaded or perhaps a ghost writer put pressure on him to reveal this drug use. but i just don't know whether when he filled out his application, he anticipated any of things . and i'm not of these things. and i'm not saying that he did or didn't admit to drug taking in his in his but i just his application, but i just wondered whether he played the tape forward of worked tape forward and sort of worked out whether if he was going to write about extensive drug use, whether that might have a retrospective sort of effect on his . his application. >> well, what happens to him and, meghan, if the reality is that he's lied about it, the americans take a dim view of

that and he's on the next plane back to blighty . that and he's on the next plane back to blighty. i mean, she's not coming with him, she ? not coming with him, is she? >> well , if that not coming with him, is she? >> well, if that scenario were to happen, i can't imagine a world in which meghan markle would ever move back to the uk. so he'll be desperately hoping that that's not the case, which is probably why he's fighting so hard to say that this is private information and that the inner workings this form aren't for workings of this form aren't for pubuc workings of this form aren't for public consumption, even if the fact that he's taken drugs has. but you're don't but you're right. i don't i can't see a world in which meghan markle moves happily back to no, absolutely look >> no, absolutely not. look now onto king, he onto the king, because he celebrated his 75th birthday onto the king, because he celebr.and his 75th birthday onto the king, because he celebr.and hismark birthday onto the king, because he celebr.and hismark birtispecial today. and to mark the special occasion, the occasion, he launched the coronation food project, which will help those living in food poverty. but the monarch didn't get away without this happening . get away without this happening. >> we start us off. how day to you. >> happy you. >> h appy birthday you. >> happy birthday to you. >> happy birthday to you. >> happy birthday to you. >> happy birthday. your majesty .

>> happy birthday. your majesty. >> happy birthday. your majesty. >> happy birthday to you . >> happy birthday to you. >> happy birthday to you. >> yes, well , there we go. but >> yes, well, there we go. but one person that won't take part in any of the celebrations is prince harry, who instead will wish his father quotes happy birthday over the phone. but charlotte , should the king have charlotte, should the king have taken his call or returned his call? what do we know? >> so i think, of course, charles has to answer the phone to his son on his birthday. but it's just so that we have it's just so sad that we have all these reports which sound like they've been leaked a little bit from harry's camp that he will be issuing. prince harry will issuing father harry will be issuing his father with a phone call on his birthday how that it has to birthday. how sad that it has to be pre—arranged and formal. be pre—arranged and so formal. and can't just nip over and then he can't just nip over and wish his dad a happy 75th birthday. it's a big milestone. and harry is quite lucky that his father is still alive at 75. you know, a lot of us, you know, have lost our fathers and, you know, at younger ages, can't they just bury the hatchet? know, at younger ages, can't they jharryrry the hatchet? know, at younger ages, can't they jharryrry ticomechet? know, at younger ages, can't they jharryrry ticome over�* know, at younger ages, can't they jharryrry ticome over and can't harry just come over and spend his birthday, his father's

death? >> do you actually think it's an inqu >> do you actually think it's an insult less then seriously, do you it's insult to say, you think it's an insult to say, well, know, i'll give my well, you know, i'll give my i'll a call? well, i'll give him a call? well, i think it is a bit i think, to sort of query it and say there will be a formally arranged phone call, you know , charles is phone call, you know, charles is going having lovely going to be having this lovely dinner house with dinner at clarence house with all of his family, all the rest of his family, and he's of having a sort of he's kind of having a sort of pre—arranged two minute, five minute phone call with his son. >> it's so and it's >> it's just so formal and it's so sad , really, because it just so sad, really, because it just shouldn't their relationship shouldn't their relationship should be as father and son, not as sort stranger from as a sort of stranger from overseas, diplomatic overseas, issuing a diplomatic phone call. >> yeah. and i think in recent days, seen king days, we've actually seen king charles very emotional charles getting very emotional publicly unveiling a publicly at the unveiling of a statue mother, our statue to his late mother, our late queen, and also the remembrance day ceremony. the idea that this guy isn't deeply, deeply by what's going on deeply hurt by what's going on with harry is for the birds. but thank you very for coming thank you very much for coming on. to hope chat to again on. ito hope chat to you again soon. large at soon. that's editor at large at the sunday. charlotte the mail on sunday. charlotte griffiths, very much. griffiths, thank you very much. coming rishi sunak coming up, how's rishi sunak written the wall and written off the red wall and turned back ordinary

turned his back on ordinary brits. i'll that to my brits. i'll pose that to my panel soon. but next, how should we deal with child killers? i have my own ideas , but james have my own ideas, but james bulger's murderer, john venables, is making a shameless parole bid that is tearing james's family apart. gb news star nana akua is not holding back on that. she comes next and the latest from nigel farage is i'm a celebrity adventure with the one and only harry redknapp that's

football legend. and i'm a celebrity champion, harry redknapp. still to come . but redknapp. still to come. but it's redknapp. still to come. but wsfime redknapp. still to come. but it's time now for gb news sensation nana akua . now the sensation nana akua. now the vicious murder of two year old james bulger was the crime that shocked the nation back in 1993. killers jon venables and robert thompson, both aged ten at the time, snatched the toddler from outside a butcher's shop in bootle. merseyside and brutally

tortured the poor boy to death. the pair became the youngest murderers in uk history and after serving life sentences , after serving life sentences, both were released with new identities. in 2001, venables , identities. in 2001, venables, now 40, has returned to prison twice for possessing indecent images of children and was last sentenced to 14 months behind bars in 2018. but with his private parole hearing commencing earlier today , the commencing earlier today, the mother of james bulger has made a desperate plea for her son's killer not to be set free. denise fergus told the daily mirror venables has had so many chancesin mirror venables has had so many chances in the past and he's blown all. doesn't care . blown them all. he doesn't care. he care about he seriously doesn't care about anybody . and in a message anybody. and in a direct message to the parole board, she said, look into my eyes and see what i've had to deal with for 30 years. three decades of hell. keep people safe from this monster because that is what he is. and don't give him what he wants . nana is. and don't give him what he wants. nana akua joins me now . wants. nana akua joins me now. nana, how should we deal with child killers like this ?

child killers like this? >> well, first of all, it's absolutely flaming ridiculous, isn't it ? i mean, let's see. so isn't it? i mean, let's see. so he's already committed murder when he's very young . he's been when he's very young. he's been given a lifelong aluminium city, which i don't think they should have given him, that they should have given him, that they should have given him an immunity. i can't ever that word , but can't ever say that word, but they give him that. but they should give him that. but then when he then if he re—offends when he comes , then that should be comes out, then that should be revoked. is he even revoked. why is he even remaining anonymous? i'm sorry. that's the first thing. secondly the fact that he's breached his parole and it is clear that he cannot not obviously behave , cannot not obviously behave, there is no way that he should even be up for parole. i don't need two days. they're going to have a two day hearing here. i don't need two days. i can tell you that in five minutes he goes back and it should be back inside and it should be life. life should life. and life. life should mean life. and i would further. okay. so i would go further. okay. so these were killers who were children at the time who killed a child . and so that's why in my a child. and so that's why in my view, they don't get the death penalty or there isn't the opfion penalty or there isn't the option for that. but whilst they're bringing this new they're bringing in this new

victims and prisoner bill, which is the moment, is going through at the moment, i be looking for child i would be looking for child killers to the option to killers to have the option to have to potential penalty. have to potential death penalty. honestly especially for those who who are potential in this case. as he comes out, he re—offends . and it's not just re—offends. and it's not just with something that's non—related, it's with child abuse images on his computer. so he's not safe. what will it take for them to keep him behind bars for them to keep him behind bars for good? what will it take exactly? >> i mean , i think you're >> i mean, i think you're echoing the views of the vast majority of people watching this now and listening to this nana do you think we're too soft? it's the bleeding heart. liberals will say everybody's capable of reform . capable of reform. >> yeah, they'll say that until it's their child or somebody they know that gets hurt and then those bleeding liberals will turn pretty sharpish. and in fact, some of those liberals are some of the most unkind people i know. anyway it's all just a smokescreen to appear caring when in reality we all

know somebody like this know that somebody like this should remain behind bars. there literally is no reason the other young the other man who committed this when he was a child, he has not done anything since. so he's been out on licence. he has not committed any any more crimes. he has gone on with his life. it is clear if you put these two together, that one of them is not capable of living without looking at child abuse images and obviously has some sort of weird thing going on where the public are not safe from him. he cannot be released . from him. he cannot be released. i don't even get why we're wasting money on time. and i say bnng wasting money on time. and i say bring back the death penalty for child know he was child killers. i know he was a child killers. i know he was a child he this, so it child when he did this, so it probably wouldn't apply to him. but could but i think that you could potentially whole potentially go back with a whole of life sentence and say, look, you reoffending, so we're you keep reoffending, so we're going a whole going to put you under a whole of life sentence. >> all too often think >> i mean, all too often i think that victims are that the victims families are cast aside in all of this. they should have, in my view . i know should have, in my view. i know this is a controversial take. i think they should get a bit of a

say in the kind of justice that these people face. you know, why should not just the families actually , but wider public actually, but the wider public have deal with? we've already have to deal with? we've already got wrong'uns out on the streets. you see them out there every at these every saturday at these hate marches. should marches. you know, why should we have with someone who's have to deal with someone who's killed and looked at killed a child and looked at child out child porn being sent back out onto streets under under onto the streets under under a fake identity . so we've got no fake identity. so we've got no idea who is . he could idea who this guy is. he could move could potentially move in. he could potentially move in. he could potentially move in. he could potentially move in next to you. well well, he'd be in trouble if he did, but frankly, i mean, it just makes no sense. but frankly, i mean, it just ma revoke;ense. but frankly, i mean, it just ma revoke ;ens]anonymity but frankly, i mean, it just ma revoke;ensianonymity , first >> revoke the anonymity, first of all, because he's breached his parole. so what? why? he's an adult now. so why does that still apply ? i don't get it. still apply? i don't get it. he's an adult now. if he commits crimes as an adult. now nobody else gets anonymity like this, so should be gone . and i so that should be gone. and i don't know why they're being so i don't why they're being i don't know why they're being so with this guy. he is so generous with this guy. he is clearly fit to go out in clearly not fit to go out in public. quite now. public. it's quite simple now. >> thank you very much. it's incredibly strong stuff like you said is the

said as well. this is just the first day of a two day parole hearing. we await the verdict on that. think that it would that. i do think that it would have a lot quicker if you'd have been a lot quicker if you'd have been a lot quicker if you'd have in charge it. have been in charge of it. i think many people will be shouting tv screens now shouting at their tv screens now saying nana for justice saying nana, nana forjustice secretary whatever is. but secretary or whatever it is. but nana, thank you very much. you take nana akua take care. all right. nana akua so look , i am going to go now to so look, i am going to go now to do a little bit of a well, it's an in—house story here for us, isn't it? a gb news? because i'm a celebrity kicks off in a few days time with our very own. nigel is the biggest name nigel farage is the biggest name going down shall we take going down under. shall we take a little look? shall we? all right . at some this year's right. at some of this year's campmates . campmates. >> all right, guys, i'm marvin humes . humes. >> probably best known for >> i'm probably best known for being one quarter of the boy band jls. >> my name is grace dent. i'm a restaurant critic . restaurant critic. >> i write books. >> i write books. >> you might have seen me on masterchef. >> i'm nigel farage. and i'm known, of course, for politics, for brexit. and i'm a hero to some people and an absolute villain to millions . villain to millions. >> all right. so. so we know all

of those people. are we? we've got the maitre d of first dates in there as well. we've got the guy off that boy band, jls. we've got nigel farage off of brexit. . but here is brexit. et cetera. but here is how spears is. sister how britney spears is. sister introduced herself to the uk public. >> my name is jamie lynn spears. i'm best known for being an actress singer. i have actress and a singer. i have been doing it since i could basically walk now, you know, you know, you're known for being britney spears sister. >> that's what you that's what you're known for. i mean , it's you're known for. i mean, it's just absolute lunacy, isn't it ? just absolute lunacy, isn't it? yeah.i just absolute lunacy, isn't it? yeah. i just don't understand how these people get away with it. half the people in the i'm a celeb as well. you've never heard of, have you? you've never heard of, have you? you've never heard coming okay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does coming okay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does a coming okay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does a former; okay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does a former king okay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does a former king of.ay. heard of, have you? you've never heard does a former king of the what does a former king of the jungle, redknapp, make of jungle, harry redknapp, make of nigel on i'm a nigel farage's chances on i'm a celebrity ? well, harry delivers celebrity? well, harry delivers his unmissable verdict that's coming your way very, very shortly. the best england manager that we never had by the way, that guy, he's going to be giving his top tips on how nigel can survive the jungle as well. but next, has rishi sunak shown

his true colours by blowing up the red wall to shore up support in the true blue south? i am as fired up as suella braverman. there will be a feisty debate from my panel too , as we pick from my panel too, as we pick through suella scathing sacking statement in which she essentially accuses our prime minister of being a liar and a conman. don't move . hello conman. don't move. hello >> good evening. alex burkill here with your latest gb news weather update ahead of some wet and windy weather on thursday . and windy weather on thursday. we have a bit of a north south split as we go into wednesday. that's because have a front that's because we have a front lying northern parts lying across northern parts which going to bring which is going to bring the focus and the focus of the cloud and the showery rain here. meanwhile, it's a quieter picture further south. we go through this south. so as we go through this evening, some clear skies across southern areas. yes, a scattering of showers , but scattering of showers, but mainly different story. mainly dry as different story. further north, lots of cloud and outbreaks of rain. some of these could be heavy at times, too. temperatures won't drop a huge amount most of but with amount for most of us. but with some across the far some clear skies across the far north of here, a touch

north of scotland here, a touch of quite we of frost is quite likely as we go through wednesday. then we continue this north south continue with this north south split, staying cloudy with further outbreaks of rain across many northern areas. but for more central england, more central southern england, wales and northern ireland, it's looking largely dry. a few showers pushing their way in across of wales and across parts of wales and towards channel, but towards the bristol channel, but otherwise plenty sunshine and otherwise plenty of sunshine and even for northern even sunny skies for northern scotland , too. temperatures for scotland, too. temperatures for many, down a degree or many, though, down a degree or so compared today with highs so compared to today with highs of around 12 or 13 celsius as we go through thursday . then go through thursday. then a swathe of wet and windy weather is going to push its way up from the south—west, staying drier further the south, further north. but in the south, we see some heavy rain we could see some heavy rain with 30 to 50mm perhaps. and gales possibly even stronger than that in exposed coasts friday looks like it will be a quieter day before the wet and windy weather returns in time for the weekend. bye bye

>> this is patrick christys tonight and suella braverman has just thrown a bomb into downing street in this sensation sacking letter, she says that rishi sunak has betrayed britain. doesn't care about stopping the boats and put us all in danger on the streets because he's too weak to make tough decisions. so who am i now holding sunak death warrant ? in other news, though, warrant? in other news, though, football legend harry redknapp reveals whether or not he backs nigel farage to be crowned king of the jungle. i show you a live on air. how easy it would be for a violent thug to get their hands on a soon to be banned xl bully dog. even if that dog has a history of committing savage attacks that will shock you. and i promise you the very best, most entertaining paper of you anywhere on national television as we take through as we take you through tomorrow's front pages and the inside exclusives, which by the way, just being told, way, i'm just being told, include absolute corker about include an absolute corker about the front bench. so the labour party front bench. so we'll that to shortly. we'll bring that to you shortly.

we've got legendary scoop getter david mad dog maddox you. we've got legendary scoop getter daviof’viad dog maddox you. we've got legendary scoop getter daviof course,; maddox you. we've got legendary scoop getter daviof course,; mibest: you. but of course, the best action takes place on the sofa. and tonight, joined by the tonight, you're joined by the opinionated and outspoken trio of philip davies mp derek lord and rebecca reid . tonight, i ask and rebecca reid. tonight, i ask if rishi sunak has betrayed britain , but i'd, of course, britain, but i'd, of course, never betray you , so get in never betray you, so get in touch. gb views or gb news dot com. i want to hear from you. tweet us at gb news as we get stuck in after the headlines with polly . patrick. with polly. patrick. >> thank you and good evening to you. well, in that scathing letter following her sacking as home secretary yesterday, suella braverman has today accused the prime minister of having manifestly and repeatedly failed to deliver on key government policy . liz, in that letter policy. liz, in that letter posted on social media this afternoon, ms braverman accused rishi sunak of betraying his promise to do whatever it takes to stop the small boat crossings by failing to override human rights. concerns about the

rwanda plan. she also urged the prime minister to change course , prime minister to change course, urgently accusing him of leading the conservatives to record election defeats. shadow minister for international development lisa nandy spoke to gb news earlier. she said the british public deserves better suella bravermans letter is just the latest in instalment in a tory psychodrama that's been playing out over the last 13 years, holding the rest of the country to ransom . country to ransom. >> while the tories fight among themselves as this reshuffle was meant to be. the moment when rishi sunak reset his leadership , when he signalled to the country that he stands for change. but with the return of david cameron and the ongoing row with suella braverman , i row with suella braverman, i think all he served to do is just show that this is a tory government that is out of ideas, out of energy. well he needs away from politics. >> the pharmaceutical giant pfizer is planning to cut around 500 jobs at its site in kent. the plans will impact the site

in sandwich , with operations set in sandwich, with operations set to continue with a different size . the company says it's size. the company says it's hoping to reduce its running costs. it's also planning to bnng costs. it's also planning to bring to an end its small molecule operations at the sandwich site , which overall sandwich site, which overall employs around 940 people. now applications have opened for britons to register their xl bully dogs for exemption before the breed is made illegal in the uk , owners who want to keep uk, owners who want to keep their dogs have now to apply for an exemption scheme or to choose to have their dog euthanized and apply for kompany nation. it will be illegal to own an xl bully dog from the 1st of february next year. the dogs must be registered by the end of january . must be registered by the end of january. health news and the government's considering making the chickenpox vaccine available on the nhs following a recommendation by scientists . recommendation by scientists. the joint committee on vaccination and immunisation says the jab should be given to

youngsters in two doses when they're 12 months and 18 months old. it says data from other countries suggests the vaccine would dramatically reduce circulating instances of chickenpox and prevent the most severe cases in children . and severe cases in children. and lastly, the king has celebrated his 75th birthday today, and he's been chatting to hundreds of nhs staff at buckingham palace this afternoon. king charles hosted a reception there for 400 nurses and midwives , and for 400 nurses and midwives, and he highlighted their work over the decades as the nhs celebrates its own 75th anniversary. the king was also treated to something of a surprise performance . s a surprise performance. s a rendition of happy birthday by the nhs choir as he left the event and earlier on today, king charles travelled to oxfordshire , where he launched the coronation food project alongside queen camilla. he hopes to bridge the gap between food waste and food need . this food waste and food need. this is gb news across the uk on tv in your car, on digital radio

and on your smart speaker by saying play gb news. this is britain's news channel . super britain's news channel. super suella sensationally skewered slippery sunak. >> she's absolutely torn him apart. she's essentially calling him a lying grifter who is betraying the british public. claims that rishi sunak will no doubt deny he sacked her over the phone, presumably because he didn't have the bottle to look her in the eye in her response is dripping with poisonous angen is dripping with poisonous anger. she accuses of lying anger. she accuses it of lying about wanting to cut illegal immigration whatever it immigration to do whatever it takes stop the boats, to get takes to stop the boats, to get the the ground. the rwanda plan off the ground. this here, this letter is huge. and it begs the question from now on, what will you actually hear come out of rishi sunak's mouth when he says stuff like this ? this? >> control of our borders? i will not rest until the boats are stopped . we will pass new are stopped. we will pass new laws to stop small boats to keep my promise to you, to stop the

boats, stop the boats . i think boats, stop the boats. i think people might hear liar , liar, people might hear liar, liar, liar, braverman accuses rishi of betraying people who voted tory in the 2019 general election and who voted for brexit in 2016. >> she says he has no intention of leaving the echr and that he knows that the rwanda plan, even if it's passed by the supreme court tomorrow, won't work because he's deliberately not made the decisions to make it work properly. why well, she says, is because he's a scaredy cat . he's a says, is because he's a scaredy cat. he's a weak says, is because he's a scaredy cat . he's a weak little scaredy cat. he's a weak little scaredy cat. he's a weak little scaredy cat who actually doesn't care about winning the next election or doing what's for the or doing what's best for the british people. he just cares about able say he about being able to say that he was minister that's the was prime minister that's the implication. that's basically what she's sending out there, isn't it? and if that's true, then i worry that it confirms what many people feared, that rishi sunak is using this country's greatest office of state simply as a line on his cv . suella says britain is at a turning point in our history and faces a threat of radicalisation

and extremism in a way not seen for 20 years. you're response has been uncertain. weak and lacking in the qualities of leadership that this country needs. she accuses him of putting off tough decisions to minimise his own political risk , minimise his own political risk, but in doing so it has put us all in danger, she says. don't merger of extremism . well, it merger of extremism. well, it makes me wonder, is rishi sunak actually playing roulette with ordinary people's lives in order to prolong his political life, the fact is that this country right now, in its hours of need, requires someone brave . it's requires someone brave. it's what we've got just a week short . trousered public school boy , i . trousered public school boy, i don't think rishi sunak cares that much about winning. look at the latest exclusive polls commissioned for gb news. just 31% of tory voters in 2019 think that they'd vote conservative at the next election. only 11% of conservative voters strongly approve of appointing david cameron in the south of the country. that's at 4. when asked if the conservatives understand people like me as in themselves ,

people like me as in themselves, just 27% of tories think that their own party understands them. in the north, the famous red that boris johnson red wall that boris johnson smashed through, that's at 1. one 1. it's staggering when it comes to rwanda, 70 or 71% of tories support it, 40% of the entire nation does, compared to 32% who don't. so now i've bombarded you with stats. suella wants to at least circumvent the echr. she wants to honour the votes of the red wall. she wants to cut illegal immigration. she wants to get the rwanda plan off the ground. she wants jihadi nutcases streets and nutcases off our streets and preferably the country as preferably out of the country as well. gets it, well. i think she gets it, doesn't she ? is that not what doesn't she? is that not what most people want? rishi sunak stands of stabbing boris stands accused of stabbing boris johnson the back. now, he's johnson in the back. now, he's accused of stabbing in accused of stabbing britain in the back suella sunak in the back suella put sunak in downing street. she might just be about to be the one to boot him out of there. well, to respond to that, i'm joined by conservative shipley conservative mp for shipley and gb very own philip gb news, his very own philip davies. banker and davies. we've got banker and visiting professor derek lord and we've got author and

journalist rebecca radler, philip , my concern with this is philip, my concern with this is that sunak has turned his that rishi sunak has turned his back ordinary people and on back on ordinary people and on the wall he's brought in the red wall he's brought in david cameron to appease david cameron tried to appease the softest mouth and they're not having any it. not having any of it. >> just i just don't see >> well, i just i just don't see this. mean, all the things this. i mean, all the things that listed said that you listed that you said that you listed that you said that braverman believes that suella braverman believes in, rishi sunak believes in them, got exactly the them, too. he's got exactly the same policy for cutting the boats across channel as boats across the channel as bofis boats across the channel as boris johnson did, as liz truss did as suella bravermans, arguing there's literally no difference in policy. policy difference in policy. the policy hasn't changed. it's exactly the same, the rwanda same, which is the rwanda policy. he wanted stop the policy. he wanted to stop the protests on last saturday. he made the same points as suella braverman did about how they were unacceptable on the streets of london wanted the police of london and wanted the police to , which is exactly to cancel them, which is exactly the same points as suella did. she didn't lose her job because she didn't lose herjob because of her beliefs. she lost her job because started writing because she started writing articles without any clearance from 10, which would lead from number 10, which would lead any lose their job any minister to lose theirjob in that situation. that was nothing to do with her beliefs. she's trying make out now

she's trying to make it out now because behaved so in in she's trying to make it out now beca|ae behaved so in in she's trying to make it out now beca|a reckless]aved so in in she's trying to make it out now beca|a reckless manner. in in she's trying to make it out now beca|a reckless manner. she's such a reckless manner. she's trying that it's trying to make it that it's because a belief she lost her because of a belief she lost her job. it's nothing to with the job. it's nothing to do with the beliefs government agrees beliefs the government agrees with on of with her point of view on all of those issues. >> when it comes whether >> but when it comes to whether or the new conservative or not the new conservative gives these wall as gives these red wall mps feel as though had been though they've had been completely shunned by rishi sunak. completely shunned by rishi sunak . we've got a little clip sunak. we've got a little clip for of a couple of them to for you of a couple of them to play for you of a couple of them to play for you, couple these play for you, a couple of these these conservatives. these new conservatives. we've got haven't we? got miriam cates, haven't we? i think we can we can play for you how. >> now. >> well, i think firstly, we just want to say that all the people that have been promoted, it's within prime it's absolute within the prime minister's gift. we've got a lot of them personally. of respect for them personally. we're give we're sure they'll give everything the job. everything they have to the job. but concerned but what we're more concerned about of travel about is the direction of travel that for the for the that it signals for the for the party. and instead of leaning that it signals for the for the partytowardsstead of leaning that it signals for the for the partytowards that of leaning that it signals for the for the partytowards that realignment of back towards that realignment of 2019 combination 2019 voters, the combination of small people small c conservatives, people from the people from the from the north, people from the south, feels like going back south, it feels like going back to ten inches an era to kind of 20 ten inches an era of , which isn't really of centrism, which isn't really what people crying out for what people are crying out for now . now in the country. >> yeah, she's not got a point there. derek you know, the

people in 2019 voted in massive numbers, the return of numbers, not for the return of david numbers, not for the return of davwell, think so. >> well, i don't think so. i mean, i think you should remember some history in 1978, in 1982, and in 1986, similar polls asked the same question . polls asked the same question. ian, was the conservative party a party of the south or the north? most people said the south, but we went on and won in the north and we won the general election in 1970 nine inches 1986 and so on. and so forth. so i discard the data that you're deaung i discard the data that you're dealing with today because i don't think it will be important when the election actually comes. people will vote on very significant issues. and it's not whether david cameron, for example, is in the cabinet or whether he's. >> did you did you did you vote for brexit out of interest? >> no, of course i didn't. >> no, of course i didn't. >> it's maybe it's not >> well, it's maybe it's not uncommon discard the uncommon for you to discard the will of the people, though, to discard will of the people. will of the people, though, to discjust will of the people. will of the people, though, to discjust casting of the people. will of the people, though, to discjust casting aside. people.

you just casting aside. >> because he didn't for it >> because he didn't vote for it doesn't trying discard doesn't mean he's trying discard it, shows maybe that it, but it shows maybe that you're a out touch. you're a bit out of touch. >> at all. >> no, not at all. >> no, not at all. >> the one thing i did >> because the one thing i did agree that politicians agree with is that politicians can't which votes to can't choose which votes to honour which not to. okay. honour and which not to. okay. >> all right, look, the red wall has handed back to has been just handed back to laboun has been just handed back to labour. i mean, it's a massive, massive affront , it? massive affront, isn't it? >> what find affront is >> and what i find an affront is when people decide that the nonh when people decide that the north a sort socially north want a sort of socially conservative, small c conservatism. think there's conservatism. i think there's a really patronising way that we talk north it's talk about the north like it's one place and they want different things. the north is not homogenous people not one set of homogenous people who all just whippets and, who all just want whippets and, and, you know, no mining . i and, you know, no mining. i mean, that is a complicated liberal arts scene in many places. i find there are very frustrated people. write them off. >> we also have a general election and that general election, the people in the north get a vote right. and they voted overwhelmingly. we all agree for boris johnson last time around they've not got time around and they've not got anything he wanted, have they? >> absolutely. but think what >> absolutely. but i think what they was johnson. they wanted was boris johnson. i think was

think boris johnson was a charismatic, captivating think boris johnson was a c didn't atic, captivating think boris johnson was a c didn't enjoy aptivating think boris johnson was a c didn't enjoy him rating think boris johnson was a c didn't enjoy him personally, i didn't enjoy him personally, but i can understand why people were for him. i think were voted for him. i think people country, people all across the country, they've been messed around by this have this party, which we all have been. think been. and consistently, i think people need a break. people think they need a break. >> so what suella is essentially saying here really is that the people who voted the tories people who voted for the tories in 2019 and the people who voted for 2016 had for brexit in 2016 have had their backs, you put up their backs, you know, put up massively sunak, who's massively by rishi sunak, who's not anything there not putting anything out there that they voted for. and it's an affront democracy. he affront to democracy. and he never it anyway never really fancied it anyway and as this is and potentially as well, this is just a footnote in his cv. it is a privilege to serve and one we should not take for granted, she says. service requires bravery and thinking of the common good. it is not about occupying the office as an end in itself. i think that's quite telling. but our very own camilla tominey who you can catch weekends , you can catch at the weekends, of course, right here of this pansh of course, right here of this parish has out and parish, philip has come out and said is essentially said that this is essentially a naked leadership bid by suella braverman. would you agree with that? >> @ know e- $— @ know if he is. >> i don't know if he is. i think a misguided one. think it's a misguided one. i don't it will help him

don't think it will help him in any leadership be any leadership bid to be perfectly honest. so if it is, i fear that she's she's she's made a mistake , derek. a mistake, derek. >> i think that she has decided in her own mind that the conservatives have lost the general election already and that she's positioning, positioning herself for a leadership challenge leadership election challenge where she believes that she will be able to say that we lost that election because weren't election because we weren't right and that she right wing enough and that she will get the support the will get the support of the party will get the support of the parobviously, i am worried that >> obviously, i am worried that there's going to be a of there's going to be a sort of critical of suella miriam critical mass of suella miriam cates, danny etcetera, cates, danny kruger, etcetera, who into who are going to lean into social . and that social conservatism. and that really because really scares me because i think there's great work done there's a lot of great work done by , particularly by the tories, particularly under cameron, terms of under david cameron, in terms of things equal marriage and things like equal marriage and teen pregnancy rates falling because of sex education. i because of sex education. and i would devastated to see would be so devastated to see that good work destroyed by by a naked, ambitious pitch . naked, ambitious pitch. >> well, the trouble is, we've got so . got so. >> oh, i'm so sorry for a second. ambitious pitch. >> pitch should i feared the problem is with all of this is

that you've got is that people are obsessed with personalities . are obsessed with personalities. >> all of a sudden we've got the sort of we have these sort of cult figures, you know, whether it's boris johnson or whether it's boris johnson or whether it's donald trump or whether they're figures, don't they're cult figures, why don't we on the policies we just focus on the policies that government pursuing that the government are pursuing rather than the personalities all time? rather than the personalities all i time? rather than the personalities all i tinboring politicians. rather than the personalities all i really)oring politicians. rather than the personalities all i really)orion politicians. rather than the personalities all i really)orion politi> i really do on that. i've got to philip. right. so to ask you, philip. right. so esther, you're you're at the half has just got a new job in government. why is this job. >> well, she's the for minister common sense, which i think so. i think she's not. i think the most really what they're going to call it. i think the most people in the country have been crying out for a minister for common sense, to be perfectly honest. and i, i suspect common sense, to be perfectly honelt. and i, i suspect common sense, to be perfectly honel mean, and i, i suspect common sense, to be perfectly honel mean, an obviously ect common sense, to be perfectly honel mean, an obviously not that i mean, i'm obviously not the minister. him to the prime minister. it's him to set for her. he's set the agenda for her. he's a great job. >> think she's greatjob. >> think she's great great job. >> think she's great choice >> i think she's a great choice for way, the thing is for it. by the way, the thing is that you know, there that obviously, you know, there are things, even with good ministers departments, ministers in departments, things slip the blob, slip through the net, the blob, the and slip through the net, the blob, the things and slip through the net, the blob, the things through and slip through the net, the blob, the things through the and slip through the net, the blob, the things through the net. d sneak things through the net. >> there, think >> esther will be there, i think as a as another line of defence. so everything will go across her

desk. to be desk. that's about to be proposed government. desk. that's about to be pranything, government. desk. that's about to be pranything, that'sovernment. desk. that's about to be pranything, that's sort]ment. desk. that's about to be pranything, that's sort ofent. if anything, that's sort of politically or woke or , politically correct or woke or, or something silly comes along, she'll be in a position to squash it. you not see how squash it. you might not see how successful she is in the role because some of the things that would happened would have happened won't happen. result happen. i suspect, as a result of being but i think of her being there. but i think a for common sense is a minister for common sense is just have another at these just have another look at these things. think things. you don't think it's a tiny bit dangerous have one tiny bit dangerous to have one person the arbiter person who becomes the arbiter of common sense is? of what common sense is? >> well , i of what common sense is? >> well, i don't think i'm not i'm trying to i don't think i'm not trying to i don't think she's going that level she's going to have that level of your household. that's going to a nightmare. to be a nightmare. >> don't think going >> i don't think esther is going to bins out. to be like the bins out. >> philip, i'm the arbiter of common sense, but i think she'll be able to flag up something that people will say, that other people will then say, have another look at this. >> don't think this will >> i don't think this will undermine her status and her authority undermine her status and her auth> i would never dare do that. >> i would never dare do that. >> well, i'm telling i >> well, i'm telling you, i assure you that. i'm assure you of that. i'm defending house anyway because. >> because she's actually the minister portfolio in minister without portfolio in the and it's the cabinet office. and it's a title that's existed since 1805. >> right . okay. but its

title that's existed since 1805. >> right. okay. but its primary duty and function at this moment in time is apparently to stop woke nonsense, to be less politically correct, which is worrying to me. >> speaking in journalist >> he's speaking in journalist language it to be language i think is it to be less as a compliment? >> well, what kind of stuff should she be blocking then? you know, is this is this stuff that the servants come up with? the civil servants come up with? and to say, that's mad. and she has to say, that's mad. >> i mean, you speaking >> well, i mean, you speaking here to a man who's never been in government and has never of your choice, of your own choice, think of your own to say own choice. i always used to say that the one thing that me and david cameron was that david cameron agreed on was that i be a minister. i should never be a minister. but so, you know, it's not for i should never be a minister. but to , you know, it's not for i should never be a minister. but to , y0|what w, it's not for i should never be a minister. but to , y0|what mike, not for i should never be a minister. but to , y0|what mike, but for i should never be a minister. but to , y0|what mike, but i)r i should never be a minister. but to , y0|what mike, but i think me to say what mike, but i think we all see things that come through blob that perhaps through the blob that perhaps might stopped might have been stopped if somebody to spot it. >> okay. all right. well, i can promise you that are going promise you that there are going to about usta's promise you that there are going to job about usta's promise you that there are going to job taking]bout usta's promise you that there are going to job taking place usta's promise you that there are going to job taking place tomorrow or new job taking place tomorrow or on certain television on certain national television channels. so great to have channels. so it's great to have the from you. and the inside scoop from you. and can i ask well, you the inside scoop from you. and can i ask well , you know, can i ask as well, you know, just quickly on this, how did you find out about it? because i've a bone to pick i've got not a bone to pick because but because i love aston. right. but but phone to her

but i was on the phone to her yesterday. i tried get her yesterday. i tried to get her on. okay. and i think i don't think she had too much notice, did no she was she was did she? no no, she was she was actually at an event with constituents when the number 10 were hold of her. were trying to get hold of her. >> i know that they >> and i know that because they then get hold of me to then tried to get hold of me to say, can you hold of esther? say, can you get hold of esther? because we're trying to get a hold of and i said, well, hold of her. and i said, well, i'm shipley and she's in. i'm in shipley and she's in. tatton so, no, it was a it tatton and so, no, it was a it was a it a complete surprise was a it was a complete surprise rise. and it certainly she rise. and it certainly and she only sort fairly only found out sort of fairly late we all wish late on. well, look, we all wish her well. >> absolutely. we all wish her well. everyone here at gb news loves sure loves esther. and i'm sure she'll absolutely cracking loves esther. and i'm sure she'll somethingly cracking loves esther. and i'm sure she'll something a cracking loves esther. and i'm sure she'll something a littleing job. so on something a little bit but this is bit different now. but this is the quite big news of the day, really. the government has announced to xl bully applications to keep an xl bully dog have now opened the xl bullies. think more dog have now opened the xl bulliyany think more dog have now opened the xl bulliyany 1don't]]ore dog have now opened the xl bulliyany 1don't they than any dog ever don't they open debate between is it open up the debate between is it the owner or the dog? that's the problem. but it's a controversial the breed controversial ban on the breed andifs controversial ban on the breed and it's to kick in from the and it's due to kick in from the end owners to end of 2023, requiring owners to register neuter their bully register and neuter their bully dogs, as well as keeping them muzzled and on a lead in public. but with just weeks until this

ban kicks in, these dogs are still being traded with ease up and down the country. now, i decided i wanted to take a little bit of a look now and show you about how easy it would be for someone who wants to buy essentially a deadly weapon to do that on the cheap online. so i thought i would take a little look as to how easy it is to get hold of an xl bully and what kind of checks you would have on the dog and on you if you were to get one. so it turns out it's very easy. so this website here, pets for homes. now no indication this website is indication that this website is doing anything wrong. in fact, they're doing anything they're not doing anything wrong. it about 30s to wrong. but it takes about 30s to find that for just £200 you could get hold of . a 70 kilo one could get hold of. a 70 kilo one yean could get hold of. a 70 kilo one year, nine month old xl bully that's described as being big boned with a massive head. they also go on to say how this dog

has recently taken a dislike to my male british bulldog, which ended up in a fight and the bulldog got quite badly injured. this here is your last chance to own this amazing breed of xl american bully. so they're obviously trying to cash in before the before the ban comes in. right right. yeah. so there was a dog there that had fought with another dog and injured it and therefore couldn't continue to live at that person's house. that dog could be yours for £200. again, i want to emphasise that website, by the way, is doing wrong. know, doing nothing wrong. you know, it's to the individual owner it's up to the individual owner if decide to sell if they want to decide to sell it. and i am very conflicted about bullies because about the xl bullies because like 99% of the time i come down on the view that it's the owner's fault and not the dog. okay? that really where okay? so that is really where i'm on this. but if you were i'm at on this. but if you were the kind of nefarious gangster that maybe wants to own an xl bully and put it to bad use,

okay, and you have £200 in cash, you can buy a breeding female. you can buy a male that , you you can buy a male that, you know, has got a history of aggression , or you can buy aggression, or you can buy a litter of puppies. aggression, or you can buy a litter of puppies . and i think litter of puppies. and i think that's probably a bit of a problem. philip, what do you think we should be doing about this? i'm not in favour of banning breeds. >> i think it's i think it's a misguided step. think it is misguided step. i think it is the and i think you'll the owners and i think you'll forever, you'll excuse the forever, if you'll excuse the pun, always chasing your tail on this, course, when this, because of course, when you breed, another breed you ban one breed, another breed will emerge to honest, will emerge. and to be honest, the people are really the the people who are really the sort unsavoury characters sort of unsavoury characters that about, they'll be that you talk about, they'll be happy things illegally happy to do things illegally anyway. so putting a ban won't stop them either. so i'm not in favour of these bans on breeds. i'd sooner we took on the owners i >> -- >> yeah. what about yourself? i've i've had dogs all my life and i'm an ambassador for the dogs trust. >> i'm not in favour of banning breeds. i believe dogs are socialised and they are really

given personalities. they all have an instinct to be aggressive , but you train them aggressive, but you train them out of that . out of that. >> i mean, you know, look, £200, most people most people know times are tough, but can find £200 somewhere. you could if you felt so strongly about it, you could get a dog there. i've just shown you that, you know , will shown you that, you know, will happily rip the face off. another dog. >> yeah, so i live on an >> yeah, well, so i live on an estate and on estate estate and somebody on my estate has i also have has one, and i also have a toddler and i am. it does worry me. and yes, absolutely it's not the fault, but if you the dog's fault, but if you breed the dogs, aggressive breed the dogs, be aggressive and aggressive, it's and then it's aggressive, it's not but still, not the dog's fault. but still, if with one if you've got a child with one arm, not going to be arm, you're not going to be pleased about it. >> yeah, enough. right. >> yeah, fair enough. all right. okay the okay well, look, coming up, the most entertaining, informative and explosive newspaper review you will not find anywhere else on national television, which includes, by the way, a staggering report on inside staggering report on the inside of the books about the of one of the books about the labour front bench. and labour party front bench. me and the stuck into the panel will get stuck into that. tomorrow's front in that. tomorrow's front pages in patrick's press pack. and there's fireworks guaranteed. but first, gb news star nigel farage has landed in australia for his record breaking

appearance in itv's i'm a celeb obe drink's on nigel when he gets out, won't it? he had 1.5 million reasons to head to the jungle. but what's in store for the once in a generation asian talisman? who better to ask than jungle king harry redknapp, who won the series back in 2018? the football legend is locked and loaded. he's live with me in just a few. see you in a

fun. every weekend at 3 pm. on gb news, the people's channel, britain's news channel .

britain's news channel. >> we will cover tomorrow's top stories with patrick's press pack very, very soon. the most entertaining press preview that you will get anywhere on national television. and that's a promise. but first, it's former premier league manager and the i'm a celeb and king of the i'm a celeb jungle. harry redknapp. this jungle. harry redknapp. and this year's series will feature a rather familiar face as gb news very own nigel farage has been sensationally unveiled as one of the ten celebs heading down under after winning the hearts of the nation and the series back in 2018, harry redknapp knows all about what it takes to survive the trials and tribulations of the australian jungle. harry joins me now. good stuff . look, harry, who are you stuff. look, harry, who are you backing to win? do you think nigel can do it? >> absolutely. yeah i think he'll i think he'll do very well i >> -- >> you know, he's a big personality. i think the people are like him. he'll be. yeah, i can see him doing very well in there . there. >> do you think there's a good

chance that you might actually be crowned king of the jungle? because be a shock because that would be a shock for of people do. for a lot of people do. >> i've got a feeling it could be, i don't if be, yeah. i don't know if anybody's but anybody's told him yet, but there's no bonus you there's no win bonus if you win, so you try quite so so maybe you won't try quite so hard. know, i'm sure i hard. but you know, i'm sure i think he will do very well. >> how tough is >> i mean, how tough is it actually in camp ? i think actually in the camp? i think the big concern that have for the big concern that i have for nigel hope someone's told nigel is i hope someone's told him that he can't get his hands on glass of red or a pint on a nice glass of red or a pint , a kind a fag even. , a kind of a fag even. >> i know he his smokes a >> i know he likes his smokes a bit, doesn't he? >> know what, harry? they've >> you know what, harry? they've made nigel made an exception for nigel farage. nigel farage is. is able to smoke in the jungle. yeah, exactly . how do you. how do you exactly. how do you. how do you feel about that ? feel about that? >> very surprised . i mean, >> very surprised. i mean, that's a shock. i mean , yeah, i that's a shock. i mean, yeah, i really can't believe that. i thought that was definitely. it was . you know, they're obviously was. you know, they're obviously mates , special rules for him. mates, special rules for him. but they obviously wanted to get him in there badly. so he'd probably get a point in there as well. wouldn't surprise me . well. wouldn't surprise me. >> i'll tell you >> yeah, well, i'll tell you what, there's if there's one

what, if there's if there's one in there, it'll find it. okay. but for sure. look, what was, what was the most testing bit for because think a lot what was the most testing bit forpeopleyecause think a lot what was the most testing bit forpeople assume, think a lot what was the most testing bit forpeople assume, don't a lot what was the most testing bit forpeople assume, don't they, of people assume, don't they, that actually when the cameras turn there's there's turn off, there's a there's a set somewhere around the corner and can buffet and and all you can eat buffet and a swimming pool. >> well that's i >> yeah. well that's what i thought before went in there. thought before i went in there. that's was feeling that's what that was the feeling i had it. thought, well i had about it. i thought, well there'll said my wife, there'll be i said to my wife, listen, caravan listen, there'll be a caravan out the back. you're going to have sandwich cup have a nice sandwich and a cup of sandwich cup of of tea, a bacon sandwich cup of tea, back, chocolate tea, come back, chocolate biscuit, down, out. biscuit, sit down, make out. you're but no, there was you're hungry. but no, there was no there gimmes. i think no there are no gimmes. i think you'll find quite and you'll find it quite tough. and what probably doesn't realise what he probably doesn't realise before goes in the jungle, before he goes in the jungle, it'll be 4 or 5 days in lockdown with. with a chaperone who won't leave him. almost certainly 16 to 18 hours a day. they'll follow him until he goes to his bedroom. you know, flipping out. >> he's not going enjoy that. >> he's not going to enjoy that. i mean, tell you, what would your advice nigel be? your top advice to nigel be? because cameras are on you because the cameras are on you all time. he's going to a all the time. he's going to be a bit the mercy mercy of

bit of the mercy of the mercy of the way the itv edit this, isn't he? what would be your advice to him? i just think be be yourself. >> i think if you go in there thinking, knowing what i know, people go in there, they watch it for they've watched it every yeah it for they've watched it every year. win it. they year. they want to win it. they have plan . i think that have a plan. i don't think that works. i you've just works. i mean, you've just got to yourself. i think you're to be yourself. i think you're better off going in there knowing what knowing nothing about what you've and just just you've got to do and just just get with if you come over you've got to do and just just getkind/ith if you come over you've got to do and just just getkind of] if you come over you've got to do and just just getkind of people ou come over you've got to do and just just getkind of people like ome over you've got to do and just just getkind of people like you, over all kind of people like you, then if then you've got a chance. if they you'll be, i'm sure they don't, you'll be, i'm sure they'll him to do plenty of they'll vote him to do plenty of trials on he'll trials anyway. early on he'll get jobs. get a bad jobs. >> did you have to do any of the eating trials, harry? because. yeah. do you keep it down? yeah. how do you keep it down? >> well, i don't know. you think about you're eating so much better . you know, you've better. you know, you've certainly. i was thinking , uh, certainly. i was thinking, uh, you know , camels, testicles or you know, camels, testicles or whatever it was we ate and, uh, fish eyeballs, you know , you fish eyeballs, you know, you imagine you're eating a nice bit of scampi and chips or something with a bit of tartar sauce on it, you just swallow it. so. it, and you just swallow it. so. yeah but the thing is, they're

not going to give you anything that's going to kill you. so, you know, you know they're going to not taste nice, but to it might not taste nice, but you it . you will survive it. >> it's all my luck. and i just don't think i could do it. honestly. i think it might be great tv if i went in there because i'm scared of everything and i couldn't. i couldn't and i just couldn't. i couldn't keep down a fish's eyeball for goodness sake. but if they come and give you as much as they give nigel, you'll go. >> they tell you that of >> they tell you that sort of money supposed to be getting. money is supposed to be getting. and i think might well and then i think you might well have you get the chance. have a go if you get the chance. >> i'll it, harry. >> look, i'll ask it, harry. right. £1.5 million supposedly for no money. >> good money, fantastic money in it . in it. >> we paid that. >> we paid that. >> yeah . too good. would i'd go >> yeah. too good. would i'd go back in for that. yeah certainly would. i'd go in for a month. i'd go for two months for that money. >> yeah. i mean, i'm not being funny . right. but you, you've funny. right. but you, you've been at the top of the game, right? of professional sports for, like, decades . yeah. you're for, like, decades. yeah. you're an absolute household name. i

know. nigel farage is a household name as well, but the idea.theidea household name as well, but the idea. the idea that nigel farage is the best paid celebrity ever to go in to i'm a celeb. i know we've got inflation, but how much that make you feel ? much that make you feel? >> well, no , listen, every year >> well, no, listen, every year you hear people getting more and more. it's going up. obviously cost of living, inflation and so where's it going to end? i mean , where's it going to end? i mean, i would think he's top of the tree at 1.5 million if that's what he's got. no one, i don't think would have earned think anyone would have earned that sort of money the past. that sort of money in the past. >> so, harry, an absolute that sort of money in the past. >> so, ilarry, an absolute that sort of money in the past. >> so, ii just an absolute that sort of money in the past. >> so, ii just want an absolute that sort of money in the past. >> so, ii just want to n absolute that sort of money in the past. >> so, ii just want to say]solute legend. i just want to say a massive thank you. and you heard it first. all right. the it here first. all right. the king of jungle himself king of the jungle himself saying nigel saying that he thinks that nigel farage, well farage, our very own, could well be the next king. harry redknapp, you legend. i'll see you very, very soon. doubt you. good luck. all right. okay now, as you know , nigel has as you all know, nigel has touched down in australia ahead of his jungle adventure . but of his jungle adventure. but don't worry. we are a family here at gb news and we wouldn't

dream of sending the big man away on his own . our reporter, away on his own. our reporter, ben leo. you know this guy? we sent him into greenpeace, his headquarters, didn't we? we've sent him to the welsh senate to doorstep people there. he's been out about outside itv's out and about outside itv's headquarters getting scoops. he was at westminster forest yesterday, getting politicians as they come they react to as they come and they react to one biggest political one of the biggest political news stories of a generation. well, he's got some exciting news for you now. take it away, ben nigel farage in the jungle dunng ben nigel farage in the jungle during the australian summer. £1.5 million right. >> yes, patrick. that's right. i will be heading to the jungle as well. >> gb news man on the ground covering nigel's every cough and spit on his jungle adventure . spit on his jungle adventure. >> tune in breakfast till prime time with exclusive updates on nigel farage in our a celeb.

i'll see you down under. i've got a plane to catch . got a plane to catch. >> i hope you're not flying business class. ben anyway, right. coming up. coming up before the night is out, daily express political editor david mazak, forensic . he tears express political editor david mazak, forensic. he tears apart suella braverman scathing letter of rishi sunak and explains what the next thing in hand is for the next thing in hand is for the beleaguered prime minister because that's all part of patrick's press pack , which is patrick's press pack, which is the most entertaining , most the most entertaining, most exhilarating newspaper review that you will get anywhere on national television. that is an absolute promise. we are going to be revealing what's on the front pages of your front pages of all of your newspapers. we're also going to front pages of all of your ne]revealing we're also going to front pages of all of your ne] revealing what's]lso going to front pages of all of your ne] revealing what's inside ing to front pages of all of your ne] revealing what's inside the to be revealing what's inside the book as well. so you will have your finger right on the pulse. my panel are riled up. they're ready to go for tomorrow's top

news radio. >> well, it's time now for the liveliest , >> well, it's time now for the liveliest, most entertaining newspaper review anywhere on telly with my press pack and

conservative mp for shipley and gb news very own philip davies joins us, banker and visiting professor derek lord and author and journalist rebecca to read the first front pages have just been delivered . okay we start been delivered. okay we start with the metro salty suella bitter braverman lashes out at rishi. that's at the top. i tell you what, there's a fascinating story on the front here. we can't say too much about it for obvious reasons, but ice hockey, death, arrest, man held on suspicion of manslaughter by police after skate blade horror dunng police after skate blade horror during match. we go over now to the i revenge served hot, they say, betraying the nation . no say, betraying the nation. no mandate incapable magical thinking on certain weak and lacking in the qualities of leadership that this country needs. they are, of course, leading with suella braverman a down cast suella on the front there. look who's also back. they say lord cameron will turn to george osborne for informal advice. yeah, i was pretty the

least shocking story that anyone's ever come across there anyway, we go to the daily star now to rhys in a tis sacked suella accuses rishi of betraying the nation a picture of a giant handbag on the front there. i suppose that's supposed to. yeah link to handbags at dawn isn't it? she says that he's a wet. he's weak, he's a bit wet. he's a so there we go. they a loser. so there we go. they also do have of course, the cracking typical daily star story of miracle of the crying virgin mary. that's page virgin mary. that's on page nine. if doesn't make nine. so if that doesn't make you star, nothing will. you buy the star, nothing will. we're the mail now. you buy the star, nothing will. we're the mail now . we had we're on the mail now. we had a deal and you broke it, suella tells pm. but rishi hits back and says he believes in actions, not not words. so those are the front pages . can i zone in on front pages. can i zone in on something here before i reveal something here before i reveal something that's on the inside of one of these papers? by the way, i'm i'm going to go in on this, philip, about this. lord cameron george cameron will turn to george osborne for informal advice twice a nightmare everyone was expecting, isn't it ? expecting, isn't it? >> well, i mean, he's foreign secretary. he's not prime minister anymore. so i mean, you

know, obviously, david and george are, you know, very close , always have been, always will be. so like you said, i don't think it's a massive shock to the system. i can't say i was a massive fan of the cameron osborne regime personally , but i osborne regime personally, but i think it's inevitable that people are going to speak to their friends for advice, isn't it? >> should we be worried about the return of george osborne as well derek well as david cameron? derek well, not not worried well, i'm not i'm not worried about the return of david cameron, but i would be about george he's a much more >> i think he's a much more toxic divisive figure. and toxic and divisive figure. and by don't think that by the way, i don't think that david will be relying on david cameron will be relying on him for foreign him too heavily for foreign affairs advice because don't affairs advice because i don't think knows anything about it. >> and just by the question , >> and just by the question, just question, what's he just beg the question, what's he really to be talking to really going to be talking to him about? views on this? him about? your views on this? then osborne then the idea that osborne could be way ? be involved in some way? >> there's a worrying >> i think there's a worrying sort tinted glasses >> i think there's a worrying sort because |ted glasses >> i think there's a worrying sort because lad glasses >> i think there's a worrying sort because i know sses >> i think there's a worrying sort because i know that was thing because i know that he was really bad at his job and he's probably not a very nice man, not know him personally, not that i know him personally, but me that's but there's a part of me that's like were back like things were better back then. should just get then. maybe we should just get

them let's let's them all back. let's just. let's just go to the david just go back to the david cameron it cameron years. at least. it wasn't it just wasn't wasn't as bad. it just wasn't as bad this. wasn't as bad. it just wasn't as bacto this. wasn't as bad. it just wasn't as bacto beis. wasn't as bad. it just wasn't as bacto be fair, it was quieter >> to be fair, it was quieter until it wasn't. >> hug a hoodie. >> hug a hoodie. >> asbos my kingdom for that kind of politics again. yeah. >> asbos my kingdom for that kind oihaditics again. yeah. >> asbos my kingdom for that kind ofhaditigreatnin. yeah. >> asbos my kingdom for that kind ofhaditigreatnin. yea david >> he had a great tactic. david cameron when you were a journalist, i was local journalist, i was a local reporter at time and he'd reporter at the time and he'd say, you've got you've say, right, you've got you've got three questions dave. got three questions with dave. okay and after the second question, no, okay and after the second qu

that it'd be interesting that regard. it'd be interesting to how many labour mps not to see how many labour mps not just it'll just vote against. it'll be interesting many interesting to see how many abstain . that's you should abstain. that's what you should always in these always watch for in these things. the number people things. the number of people who just decide, i won't be there for could be a for the vote. there could be a very high number of those. yeah. >> make of this >> what do you make of this then, i mean, this is then, derek? i mean, this is starmer standing up to quite a lot of loud voices in his party. well >> well, i mean, he has got some kind of authority over the front bench, which he doesn't have over people who back over people who are on the back benches. over people who are on the back benches . so he would have to benches. so he would have to make an example of them. but by the way, i mean, the thing usually that would happen is that they would resign in advance of voting against the party whip and it would be very surprising if they chose not to do that. but i would make a broader point is that parliament is much better place for people like philip because for centuries we've sent men and women to to parliament exercise their judgement women to to parliament exercise theirjudgement and deal with their judgement and deal with our concerns and grievances and not to be bound by a party whip,

particularly when their conscience doesn't take them in their going obe is on this because it's a this is an issue that frankly keir starmer could have come unstuck on and he's coming out to be very strong on this. >> now he's saying he will sack anyone. it's expected he will sack anyone if they don't toe the labour line . the labour party line. >> really unenviable >> he's in a really unenviable position because the labour party toxic history party has a really toxic history of and he to of anti—semitism and he needs to not lean into that. but also a lot of labour mps come from constituencies where islam is the religion the dominant religion and generally sympathy generally speaking, sympathy is with and anybody who with palestine and anybody who is coming out of is seeing news coming out of gaza sympathy for both. if gaza has sympathy for both. if you see babies coming off incubators as you're and you see jewish children murdered, incubators as you're and you see je is sh children murdered, incubators as you're and you see jeis horrificren murdered, incubators as you're and you see je is horrific on murdered, incubators as you're and you see jeis horrific on both murdered, incubators as you're and you see jeis horrific on both sidesdered, incubators as you're and you see jeis horrific on both sides .3red, incubators as you're and you see jeis horrific on both sides . ied, it is horrific on both sides. i think in a hideous, hideous think he's in a hideous, hideous position. at all. >> yeah. okay. well, there you go. definitely one for go. that's definitely one for inside the papers you inside the papers for you tomorrow. times. tomorrow. that's in the times. but ask you this. what do but let me ask you this. what do nigel esther mcvey and nigel farage, esther mcvey and jeremy yousaf jeremy corbyn and humza yousaf have common? no, not the most have in common? no, not the most dysfunctional coalition to ever grace they are all up grace the uk. they are all up for a prize in tonight's

greatest britain and union. jack that's just in a few moments. but i have got some more from pages for you and some more stories from inside the book coming way in. a tick. coming your way in. just a tick. we're the political editor of the daily express, david marr . the daily express, david marr. my panel are also on standby to look. there's some absolute rockers in here, so make sure you stay tuned. we're back in a tech

now. tomorrow promises another bumper news day. suella braverman launched her scathing attack on rishi sunak and the supreme court's ruling comes on the legality of the rwanda migrant plan that's looming large. but to offer his expert analysis on tomorrow's biggest stories , i'm delighted to stories, i'm delighted to welcome the political editor of the daily express online. it's david maddox. david, thank you very much. i'm going to start with the express. okay war is declared. it says on the front.

suella accuses rishi of betraying the nation. suella braverman accused rishi sunak of betrayal in this blistering attack. what do you make of that , david? >> well, i don't think we could be more right with our headline, actually. >> i think that is exactly what suella did with her letter . suella did with her letter. >> she read out the charge sheet to accused, essentially accused the prime minister of being dupuchousin the prime minister of being duplicitous in the agreement that he made of her when he appointed to his home secretary. i remember reporting on that actually as a kind of insider story at the time when he became prime minister reporting on the talks. we had with suella and, you know, there was certainly an agreement there. and it looks like he's broken it. the rwanda decision even breaker on all this . it goes the wrong way. this. it goes the wrong way. then the prime minister's got a fight on his hands to survive.

>> look, she's obviously saying that she has got copies, it would appear anyway , of some of would appear anyway, of some of these agreements that they've reportedly signed together . reportedly signed together. where do you expect in your paper another papers to be receiving some copies of those signatures and those contracts , signatures and those contracts, do you think at some point and then publishing them? i wouldn't be surprised . be surprised. >> i've i gather she's going to be making a statement to the house tomorrow . so i wonder if house tomorrow. so i wonder if she's going to produce it with a flourish and say, here it is , flourish and say, here it is, and then distribute it to our good selves in the media. that's what i would do if i was advising her. that's what i would tell her to do. and i think we're going to have quite some drama tomorrow. so you think that there's a chance on the day of the rwanda supreme court ruling, which will obviously going be focusing obviously going to be focusing on gb news? on here at gb news? >> think a chance on here at gb news? >> suella|k a chance on here at gb news? >> suella braverman chance on here at gb news? >> suella braverman mightz that suella braverman might stand up the house of commons stand up in the house of commons tomorrow whatever tomorrow and reveal whatever kind signed letter she's got kind of signed letter she's got from rishi that trail of

from rishi sunak that trail of broken promises, which, by the way , is also leading the way, is also what's leading the times . this is the times's way, is also what's leading the times. this is the times's front page braverman pm lied to page today. braverman pm lied to me and betrayed britain very strong on the front of times strong on the front of the times resignation letter condemns migration an failure rebellion looms as if court blocks rwanda plan. david on that tomorrow then you think we could get box office braverman in the commons teeing off coupled with potentially a supreme court loss on rwanda ? what happens then ? on rwanda? what happens then? >> well, i think all chaos breaks out because the supreme court loss on rwanda will mean that the right of a party will tell rishi sunak this is it. that the right of a party will tell rishi sunak this is it . we tell rishi sunak this is it. we have to leave the european convention of human rights. we have to end this politicised thought in strasbourg from telling us what to do. brexit is not finished . unless we do that, not finished. unless we do that, we can't take control of our borders unless we do that . we borders unless we do that. we can't stop the boats unless we do that. sunak we know now we'll say no because that's why he's appointed james cleverly as home

secretary, who is completely absurd and suella will raise the bannerin absurd and suella will raise the banner in the house of commons. and i think from then on the letters will be going in. it may take a few weeks, but you know, that's where we are . that's where we are. >> look, just just quickly, because don't just want because we don't just want to bnng because we don't just want to bring front pages here. bring you the front pages here. we want to bring you some scoops from as well. in from inside the book as well. in tonight's telegraph carries a column news, very own column from gb news, very own camilla who this camilla tominey who writes this suella keller suella braverman keller resignation letter is an unashamed leadership pitch designed not just to humiliate the man who sacked her, but also to position herself as a leadership contender if or when the party lose the 2024 election. david we've not got too long. what do you make of that ? that? >> well, camilla's a brilliant journalist, of course, like many formerly of a sunday express, one thing i would say is not necessarily before the next election . the people i'm talking election. the people i'm talking to suggest that her eyes are become leader and prime minister ahead of the general election.

so you have not only predicted that all chaos might break loose tomorrow as well as braverman might see off in the commons, but she might also technically be before the be prime minister before the next election. >> what we're >> i don't know what we're paying >> i don't know what we're paying you, david, but. but it's not enough. >> i'm not necessarily >> no, no, i'm not necessarily predicting i'll be writing predicting that. i'll be writing a tomorrow about why a bit a piece tomorrow about why a bit like heseltine, she like michael heseltine, she could the knife but not could wield the knife but not get the reward and i. >> fascinating. so david, thank you very much. always a pleasure. take care. david maddox there. right. okay it is time to reveal today's greatest britain and union jackass . britain and union jackass. right? i britain and union jackass. right? i think we're going in. are we with the greatest britain? philip i'll start with you. who's your greatest? >> britain today? my greatest britain farage. he's a britain is nigel farage. he's a great he's one of the greatest britain's anyway, in his own right. but he's taken the political world by storm. he's now taken the media world by storm gb news. and i think storm on gb news. and i think like harry redknapp , he's going like harry redknapp, he's going to take the jungle by storm, too. >> you had a little look at the odds >>i odds

>> ihad odds >> i had a look at the i always look at the odds. i'm sure harry redknapp looked at the odds as well. he likes a bet as well. good old harry. 6 to 1. nigel farage is to the celebrity good old harry. 6 to 1. nigel farage and the celebrity good old harry. 6 to 1. nigel farage and wouldn'tlebrity good old harry. 6 to 1. nigel farage and wouldn't putity jungle. and i wouldn't put anybody having quid. anybody off having a few quid. >> right , derek, go anybody off having a few quid. >> right, derek, go on. >> all right, derek, go on. well, my gracious le parisien is esther mcvey and i'm saying that not husband showed not because her husband showed you film . you up that film. >> i didn't know he was going. i should have done. >> i didn't know that he was should have done. >> i cto1't know that he was should have done. >> i (to be know that he was should have done. >> i (to be here that he was should have done. >> i (to be here because was should have done. >> i (to be here because i'll going to be here because i'll miss her to start with and also because i think she's full of sound common sense , and britain sound common sense, and britain needs that. >> okay , well, we're off to >> okay, well, we're off to a strong start. go on, rebecca. >> mine's the jc vi, which are the joint committee on vaccination and immunisation who the joint committee on vactryingn and immunisation who the joint committee on vac trying totnd immunisation who the joint committee on vac trying to make munisation who the joint committee on vac trying to make the]isation who are trying to make the chickenpox vaccine available to babies, would mean that babies, which would mean that children get less ill. and it's just really, really nice, less of financial burden at the of a financial burden at the moment. for it moment. you have to pay for it privately. it'd be great not to have have to pay for it. >> i did not realise you had to pay >> i did not realise you had to pay for a chicken in america. >> in most the european >> in most of the european countries. it's a standard thing that given here.

countries. it's a standard thing that policy given here. countries. it's a standard thing that policy is given here. countries. it's a standard thing that policy is justgiven here. countries. it's a standard thing that policy is just leten here. countries. it's a standard thing that policy is just let them a. countries. it's a standard thing that policy is just let them have it. >> i do wonder whether or not a lot of old issues that lot of the old issues that we have with are putting have with covid are putting people other vaccines. >> really important. >> it's really important. the mmr important. >> it's really important. the mm the important. >> it's really important. the mm the same important. >> it's really important. the mm the same thing.nportant. not the same thing. >> all right. all right. right so the winner of tonight's great britain shock, britain is nigel farage. shock, horror, britain is nigel farage. shock, h0ifair, genuinely wrestled be fair, i genuinely wrestled with the idea esther mcvey, with the idea of esther mcvey, but to didn't but i didn't want to didn't want to what we could to really show you what we could have a joint winner, right? uni and jackass. go on, my and jackass. go on, fill my union jackass >> and there a world >> and if there was a world championship for union jackasses, my nomination would probably win. it's jeremy corbyn. he could probably win it. the year, but it. most days of the year, but he's winning it he's definitely winning it today. 15 times, today. yesterday, 15 times, repeatedly , he refused say repeatedly, he refused to say that hamas were a terrorist organisation. jackass. organisation. total jackass. >> yeah. go. go on then. derek humza yousaf, the leader of the snp for calling for a general election, the only person in britain really want britain that doesn't really want one fair enough. one is him. okay fair enough. >> go on then. minus jamie lynn spears also going into the jungle. she was asked what the vox pop they all said why they were famous. and she said, i'm best as an actress and best known as an actress and singer. no, she's sorry. singer. no, she's not. sorry. the delusion . sit there and say

the delusion. sit there and say she's spears little she's britney spears little sister. oh, i see. the only interesting thing she's best known for being actress, known for being an actress, singer, for being the singer, best known for being the only interesting thing she ever did aged 16, did was get pregnant, aged 16, on show that on a nickelodeon show that was good gossip, right? >> strong stuff, i >> well, it's strong stuff, i must right. we're going must admit. right. we're going to of the to go find my winner of the union. jackass is humza yousaf . union. jackass is humza yousaf. it could have been jeremy corbyn again , to be fair. but i didn't again, to be fair. but i didn't want fail. right. again, to be fair. but i didn't want you fail. right. again, to be fair. but i didn't want you very fail. right. again, to be fair. but i didn't want you very fail. ri fantastic thank you very much. fantastic panel thank you very much. fantastic panel. i've really, really enjoyed we've set the world enjoyed it. we've set the world to we've a laugh as to rights. we've had a laugh as well. phil, derek, rebecca, thank you. i will be again thank you. i will be back again tomorrow 9 it's going to tomorrow at 9 pm. it's going to be me tomorrow. okay. because we've got whatever suella says in comments. also got in the comments. we've also got the ruling because the old rwanda ruling because there be a tory coup. see you at nine. >> hello. good evening. alex burkill here with your latest gb news weather update ahead of some and windy weather on some wet and windy weather on thursday a bit of a thursday. we have a bit of a north south split as into north south split as we go into wednesday. because we wednesday. that's because we have lying across have a front lying across northern parts which is going to bnng northern parts which is going to bring the focus of the cloud and the showery rain here. meanwhile, it's quieter

meanwhile, it's a quieter picture so as we picture further south. so as we go through this evening, some clear skies across southern go through this evening, some clear syes, across southern go through this evening, some clear syes, a:ross southern go through this evening, some clear syes, a scatteringiern go through this evening, some clear syes, a scattering of] areas. yes, a scattering of showers, but mainly dry as different story further north, lots of cloud and outbreaks of rain. some of these could be heavy times to temperatures heavy at times to temperatures won't drop a huge amount for most but with some clear most of us. but with some clear skies across the north of skies across the far north of scotland here, frost scotland here, a touch of frost is likely as we go through is quite likely as we go through wednesday. then we continue with this split, staying this north south split, staying cloudy with further outbreaks of rain many northern areas. rain across many northern areas. but for more central southern england, wales and northern ireland, it's looking largely dry. a few showers pushing their way in across parts of wales and towards the bristol channel, but otherwise of sunshine and otherwise plenty of sunshine and even northern even sunny skies for northern scotland for scotland to temperatures for many though down a degree or so compared highs of compared to today with highs of around 12 or 13 celsius as we go through thursday. then a swathe of wet and windy weather is going to push its way up from the staying drier the south—west, staying drier further north. but the south, further north. but in the south, we could see heavy rain we could see some heavy rain with 30 to 50mm perhaps, and

gales possibly even stronger than that in exposed coasts. friday looks like it will be a quieter day before the wet and windy weather returns in time for the weekend. but by coming next time on the dinosaur hour, you know we killed a man. >> did i tell you that? no bellissima, no bellissima bellissima, no bellissima bellissima . bellissima. >> oh, really? we were in arizona. >> she got stung by a scorpion. >> she got stung by a scorpion. >> the scorpion was . the >> the scorpion was. the scorpion was throwing up for hours as the dinosaur are with me. >> john cleese sundays at 9:00 on

gb news the top story from the gb news room. >> in a scathing letter following her sacking as home secretary yesterday, suella braverman has accused the prime minister today having minister today of having manifestly failed minister today of having midelivery failed minister today of having mideliver on failed minister today of having mideliver on key failed minister today of having mideliver on key governmentd to deliver on key government policies . in a letter posted on policies. in a letter posted on social media this afternoon, mr braverman accused rishi sunak of betraying his promise to do whatever it takes to stop the small boat crossings and by

failing to override human rights concerns about the rwanda plan. she also urged the prime minister to change course urgently accusing him of leading the conservative cvs to record election defeats . shadow election defeats. shadow minister for international development lisa nandy, said the british public deserve better. >> suella bravermans letter is just the latest instalment in a tory psychodrama thats been playing out over the last 13 years. holding the rest of the country to ransom while the tories fight among themselves. this reshuffle was meant to be the moment when rishi sunak reset his leadership when he signalled to the country that he stands for change. but with the return of david cameron and the ongoing row with suella braverman , i think all he served braverman, i think all he served to do is just show that this is a tory government that is out of ideas, energy , lisa nandy ideas, out of energy, lisa nandy there is well, the governments announced today sanctions will be put against four hamas leaders in the uk and two of the

terror groups, financiers . terror groups, financiers. >> it's actually one of david cameron's first moves as foreign secretary. he took up the post yesterday . they'll be made yesterday. they'll be made subject to travel bans, asset freezes and arms embargoes that prohibit the sale of weapons to any of those individuals. prohibit the sale of weapons to any of those individuals . the any of those individuals. the governments considering making the chickenpox vaccine available on the nhs following a recommendation by science artists, the joint committee on vaccination and immunisation says the jab should be given to youngsters in two doses when they're 12 months and 18 months old. it says data from other countries suggest the vaccine would dramatically reduce circulating cases of chickenpox and prevent the most severe cases in children in now the liverpool football striker luis diaz has had an emotional reunion with his father in colombia after the 58 year old football coach was kidnapped earlier this month. in a post on social media this evening, the colombia football federation published pictures of the

family's