gb news. >> good evening. you're with gb news and the breaking news tonight is that the uk and the united states have carried out joint airstrikes against houthi targets in yemen . they say targets in yemen. they say taking out houthi missile storage strike sites and launchers in the second set of coordinated strikes against the iran backed militants there. the uk and the us once again carrying those joint airstrikes against houthi targets in yemen . against houthi targets in yemen. well, tonight, the defence secretary grant shapps said joint uk us airstrikes against houthi sites in yemen will deal another blow to their limited stockpiles and ability to threaten global trade. that breaking news to us just in the last hour . we'll also happening last hour. we'll also happening this evening. israel has

proposed a two month ceasefire in gaza in return for the release of all hostages. that's according to the local news agency axios . israel put forward agency axios. israel put forward the proposal through qatari and egyptian mediators , and it egyptian mediators, and it includes two months of a pause includes two months of a pause in the fighting as part of a multi—phase deal, which would include the release of all remaining hostages in gaza and within the last couple of hours, the government's rwanda plan was also the subject of breaking news tonight. it suffered something of blow in the house something of a blow in the house of lords. peers were discussing just how safe the country rwanda is , and they voted to delay the is, and they voted to delay the government's flagship bill 214 votes to 171. that's a majority of 43 until they said ministers could show that rwanda was a safe country. just last week, rishi sunak urging the house of lords to do the right thing and endorse his government's flagship anti—migrant policy aimed at deterring illegal migrants from getting into small boats and crossing the english

channel. well, a new weather system is on its way and weather warnings have been issued. it's a new storm called storm jocelyn andifs a new storm called storm jocelyn and it's heading for the uk right now. just as the country recovers from storm isha. two people died yesterday and tens of thousands remain without power after the uk was battered by high winds. power after the uk was battered by high winds . gusts of up to by high winds. gusts of up to 100 miles an hour and heavy rain caused major travel disruption with flooding and fallen trees forcing planes to be diverted and trains to be cancelled, and scotrail has announced it's again suspending services from 7:00 tomorrow as the new weather front approaches, so there'll be no trains on wednesday morning either . scotrail says while they either. scotrail says while they check the lines for damage and lastly, downing street has denied the government's pursuing an anti—bbc agenda after announcing a raft of reforms as part of a review into the corporation down under new plans, ofcom could gain more powers over bbc news website

articles as if they don't meet relevant standards . these relevant standards. these government recommendations imply ofcom should be given increased oversight over the bbc's online services , including its youtube services, including its youtube channel. the prime minister said today that the bbc is not immune today that the bbc is not immune to scrutiny . that's the news on to scrutiny. that's the news on gb news across the uk, on tv in your car, on digital radio and on your smart speaker. this is britain's news channel . britain's news channel. hello and welcome to headliners, your first look at tuesday's newspapers . newspapers. >> i'm andrew doyle and joining me tonight are two comedy heavyweights , steve hands of heavyweights, steve hands of stone n allen and nick, the cumbrian hurricane. >> dixie . >> dixie. >> dixie. >> i think that works for you . >> i think that works for you. >> i think that works for you. >> you've got a very steely, brawny look about you, but

you've been hitting the gym, haven't you.7 >> haven't you? >> yes, but i was worried when you said heavyweight. you're just a euphemism for fat. >> no, no, i was about >> no, no, i was talking about your frame. your muscular frame. >> you. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> very, attractive. hands >> very, very attractive. hands of stone. >> very, very attractive. hands of snecessarily a good thing >> necessarily a good thing because seems like because it seems like a euphemism arthritis. because it seems like a euphemism arthritis . yes. euphemism for arthritis. yes. >> you're right. it is ambiguous. >> i should be clearer in my compliments. good stone. >> i should be clearer in my conthereents. good stone. >> i should be clearer in my conthere we. good stone. >> i should be clearer in my conthere we go. od stone. >> i should be clearer in my conthere we go. thank1e. >> i should be clearer in my conthere we go. thank you. >> there we go. thank you. that's what i should have said. >> i'll that tomorrow . >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >> but anyway, have look >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >>thet anyway, have look >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >>the frontrvay, have look >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >>the front pages have look >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >>the front pages for1ave look >> and i'll do that tomorrow. >>the front pages for tuesday. 3k at the front pages for tuesday. and is leading and the daily mail is leading with wades into the with starmer wades into the culture wars side of the woke. >> surprise, surprise the times has blood test can detect early sign of alzheimer's and the guardian medics urged not not to report illegal abortions to police. the metro is leading with a fat busting balloon moon pill on the nhs and the eye news has uk's worst storms in a decade will become the norm and the daily star, who's a pretty botty mouth boy then that's some parrot who's being swearing. very important news there. those were your front pages . and of

were your front pages. and of course, it's probably too late for the newspapers to have picked up on the rwanda bill being defeated in the house of lords. that's not going be lords. so that's not going to be on pages. so we can't on the front pages. so we can't really cover it, steve, because it's a paper review. yeah >> the daily mail >> do you think the daily mail would bothered by that. would even be bothered by that. >> they wouldn't. would even be bothered by that. >> couldn'they wouldn't. would even be bothered by that. >> couldn'they vless. n't. would even be bothered by that. >> couldn'they vless. yeah. rwanda couldn't care less. yeah. they know what it is. they don't even know what it is. so let's say fair. let's move to on the cover daily on the front cover of the daily mail . what are they mail for tuesday. what are they leading this version's mail for tuesday. what are they leadi|with this version's mail for tuesday. what are they leadi|with starmer version's mail for tuesday. what are they leadi|with starmer versiorinto gone with starmer wades into culture wars the side of the culture wars on the side of the woke right. >> again, i'm not sure. i'm >> and again, i'm not sure. i'm not sure if the daily mail likes the or not. the woke or not. >> i'll read it, will clarify as we through. yeah. what's the we go through. yeah. what's the gist he's done some kind gist of it? he's done some kind of hasn't of speech, hasn't he? >> well, pointed out that >> well, he's pointed out that he says the conservatives are fighting culture war, right? fighting a culture war, right? to they can have that to so that they can have that battle than mention battle rather than mention what they've the last they've got up to over the last decade. pointed out decade. and he's pointed out that to attack that they've tried to attack things like the rnli. and he said his take on this is if you

have served this country by being on a lifeboat or something, you deserve some respect . wait minute, respect. wait a minute, he's fighting the culture wars, right? >> well, this is the problem. i have with this because, you know, the know, i don't think that the culture anything do culture war has anything to do with right. i think the with left and right. i think the conservatives been conservatives have been responsible some responsible for some of the worst because worst woke excesses because they've for the they've been in power for the last but it's very last 13 years. but it's very interesting that would suggest last 13 years. but it's very intermost] that would suggest last 13 years. but it's very intermost of1at would suggest last 13 years. but it's very intermost of the would suggest last 13 years. but it's very intermost of the cultural;uggest that most of the cultural revolutionaries we're that most of the cultural revolut self—identify we're that most of the cultural revolut self—identify as re that most of the cultural revolut self—identify as being seeing self—identify as being left wing. and so it seems a bit odd for starmer to suggest that responding to those cultural revolutionaries is in itself waging a woke war. isn't it really just opposing the culture warriors rather than perpetuating, i think, regard of which angle you attack this war, you are. >> f— e something for >> it's achieving something for you.the >> it's achieving something for you. the conservatives are using it a distraction from what it as a distraction from what they've done for the past ten years, some of which we know you wouldn't agree with. and then the managing the keir starmer is managing to not talk about any not have to talk about any policies, because engaging in this no gets any this fight, no one gets any details. sit there details. but we all sit there going, know side going, yeah, i know which side i like they win, but like and i hope they win, but isn't important, nick? isn't it important, nick? >> cultural issues

>> these, these cultural issues massively complete gaslighting >> this is complete gaslighting from says that the from starmer. he says that the government tangled in government got so tangled up in culture own making culture wars of their own making completely they're not completely absurd. they're not of . what of their own making. what the government take on government has done is take on the culture wars that blair, if anything, started, they've continued. heir continued. cameron was the heir to more emerged to blair. more have emerged since. tories have since. and what the tories have actually done is very late. tried tackle a few of the tried to tackle a few of the culture wars incredibly late, and gaslighting culture wars incredibly late, and starmer gaslighting culture wars incredibly late, and starmer. gaslighting culture wars incredibly late, and starmer. it gaslighting culture wars incredibly late, and starmer . it reveals|ting culture wars incredibly late, and starmer . it reveals what from starmer. it reveals what kind of government is kind of government labour is going be. remember, starmer going to be. remember, starmer is which is a subset is a pabloite, which is a subset of he's a lefty of trotskyism. he's a far lefty at heart. is why his at heart. this is why his gaslighting important things. gaslighting on important things. it's the bolshevik it's like we're in the bolshevik revolution. he's going, oh, stop going . it's real, going on about lenin. it's real, it's happening. and everyone going on about lenin. it's real, it's ha|it.ening. and everyone going on about lenin. it's real, it's ha|it. now, and everyone going on about lenin. it's real, it's ha|it. now, and everyone going on about lenin. it's real, it's ha|it. now, and eyears1e knows it. now, a few years ago, you bit mad talking you sounded a bit mad talking about people my parents about it. people like my parents thought was, know. what's thought i was, you know. what's he it affects he on about now? it affects everyone's because whether everyone's life. because whether it's someone trying get into it's someone trying to get into a or, you know, a changing room or, you know, women's anything, women's sports or anything, the culture coming around to it >> but he's coming around to it isn't it? i mean, starmer has worked what woman is. so worked out what a woman is. so thatis worked out what a woman is. so that is progress. you know, like worked out what a woman is. so ticouple'ogress. you know, like worked out what a woman is. so ticouple'ogress. yago now, like worked out what a woman is. so ticouple'ogress. yago he v, like worked out what a woman is. so ticouple'ogress. yago he wasn't a couple of years ago he wasn't sure. he's worked sure. and now he's worked that out. has the vibe of a guy who >> he has the vibe of a guy who probably didn't get first hand

evidence while. haha. >> that's a haha. >> that's 5 below the >> that's very a bit below the belt. well, quite literally. um, but yeah. no. but i think, i think a point that, think nick has got a point that, you it's a bit rich you know, really it's a bit rich coming starmer because you know, really it's a bit rich comingwhen starmer because you know, really it's a bit rich comingwhen stcomes3ecause you know, really it's a bit rich comingwhen stcomes to :ause you know, really it's a bit rich comingwhen stcomes to thee clearly when it comes to the culture war issues, labour are going things i going to make things worse. i know bit of a fan, know you're a bit of a fan, steve, but surely you must see that they're make that they're going to make things worse. things even worse. >> it's not being a bit of >> it's not about being a bit of a it's more about a fan, it's more about being able step back and able to take a step back and look at the other things. i don't so it's not just don't like. so it's not just going, this going, wait a minute, this headline's in headline's got keir starmer in it. must hate it. um, i think it. i must hate it. um, i think you're right say, look, you're right to say, look, some of these things are also the responsibility of tories. responsibility of the tories. well things going to well other things are going to be labour. i mean, be worse under labour. i mean, i don't think disagree. don't think i can disagree. >> is criticising the rnli even a war issue? nick. a culture war issue? nick. >> very he >> no, that's very strange. he even as calling that even goes as far as calling that a kind of weird mccarthyism. and actually a couple of things about that. one, that's absurd hyperbole. was hyperbole. two mccarthy was right. of right. there were loads of communists hollywood communists in hollywood and actually, he had point. actually, he had a point. >> who >> there were people who were falsely accused of that. >> realise you've >> but we now realise you've read wrong. he read the crucible was wrong. he had ifs had a point. but look, it's absurd. i mean, i've absurd. even in the i mean, i've got to express this in the mail.

i looking express i was looking at the express piece. woke a modern piece. it says woke a modern turn. for those with turn. for those concerned with looking racism looking at how historical racism and injustice should be addressed present, is addressed in the present, how is that definition creeping into even the express checked out? even the express i checked out? it's young journalist who's it's a young journalist who's probably somehow, it's a young journalist who's probably got somehow, it's a young journalist who's probably got a somehow, it's a young journalist who's probably got a job. somehow, somehow got a job. >> that's not that's not anyone's work. >> that's not that's not any it's's work. >> that's not that's not any it's madness work. >> that's not that's not any it's madness of work. >> that's not that's not any it's madness of the mk. >> that's not that's not any it's madness of the word. >> it's madness of the word. it's madness. still have that as >> it's madness of the word. it definition s. still have that as >> it's madness of the word. it definition because ave that as a definition because we know it's like it's not that. it's like when the word literally got the extra definition of meaning, literally. >> f'- e word means >> i know the word woke means one total opposite. >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? everyone's different views >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? ev whate's different views >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? ev what it; different views >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? ev what it means. ferent views >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? ev what it means. okay, views >> oh, it's hopeless, isn't it? vahat it means. okay, let's; of what it means. okay, let's move front cover move on now to the front cover of telegraph. nick, of tuesday's telegraph. nick, you've one. you've got this one. >> yes, and i have an alzheimer's story, but we're moving badenoch moving on and doing the badenoch to pay. to intervene in gender pay. trans okay. which is a very trans row. okay. which is a very interesting about kemi interesting story about kemi badenoch. interesting story about kemi ba sayoch. interesting story about kemi ba say it.|. interesting story about kemi basay it. um, sorry, kemi. if to say it. um, sorry, kemi. if i got it wrong and she's saying there's this absurd thing there's this absurd new thing where have been where civil servants have been told by the government equalities office, whatever that is, that should record is, that they should record gender on is, that they should record gencthe on is, that they should record gencthe workers on is, that they should record gencthe workers identify, on is, that they should record gencthe workers identify, rathern how the workers identify, rather than biological sex, thus than their biological sex, thus making the thing making the whole thing pointless. kind of pointless. and it's kind of bleakly in that the bleakly hilarious in that the whole gender pay gap was a

fiction anyway, or at least a vast oversimplification . asian. vast oversimplification. asian. you know, men prefer to work more hours. choose more hours. they choose different there's multiple different jobs. there's multiple multiple don't multiple factors. they don't literally less for literally pay a woman less for the job. some cases there the same job. some cases there are freelance negotiations are like freelance negotiations where different. where it's different. i understand all but the pay understand all that, but the pay gap already a bit silly. gap was already a bit silly. but now that's they've outworked the pay now that's they've outworked the pay because it's to pay gap because it's going to be meaningless because you will be able your different able to put your different genden able to put your different gender. or if you don't identify as you'll gender. or if you don't identify as excluded you'll gender. or if you don't identify as excluded from you'll gender. or if you don't identify as excluded from the you'll gender. or if you don't identify as excluded from the datau'll entirely. i surely, steve, >> i mean, surely, steve, if they suggesting that the they are suggesting that the gender pay gap is to do with systemic sexism, then the actual biological sex of the individuals concerned is irrelevant factor. oh yeah, i mean, this story is hilarious . mean, this story is hilarious. >> a great way to ruin data. i mean, the pressure that the bbc must be putting on gary lineker to come on change because we get a lot of flak about paying men more. come on, take one for the team. yeah. >> if he felt he could, he could just he's a woman it just say he's a woman now. it wouldn't out of wouldn't actually be out of character for think. character for him, i think. i think he could well as think he could well go down as a woman of colour. >> could probably do it, but

>> he could probably do it, but it does mess. >> right, it messes >> yeah, you're right, it messes with data. but the data, as with the data. but the data, as you say, was flawed. so this is of interest. >> where stand >> steve, where do you stand on the gap? the gender pay gap? because i know where nick stands. he's just perfectly clear. know where nick stands. he's just when perfectly clear. know where nick stands. he's just when it perfectly clear. know where nick stands. he's just when it comesfectly clear. know where nick stands. he's just when it comes to tly clear. know where nick stands. he's just when it comes to this.ear. know where nick stands. he's just when it comes to this idea, but when it comes to this idea, you know, it has been illegal to pay you know, it has been illegal to pay women men different you know, it has been illegal to pay wom for men different you know, it has been illegal to pay wom for the men different you know, it has been illegal to pay wom for the sameiifferent you know, it has been illegal to pay wom for the same work�*nt you know, it has been illegal to pay wom for the same work for amounts for the same work for about 50, 60 years. so it doesn't happen. um, so is not doesn't happen. um, so is it not the uh, gender the case that, uh, the gender pay the case that, uh, the gender pay certainly pay gap is certainly misperceived or misunderstood? >> i think flaw in >> yeah, i think it's a flaw in the don't think it's the stats. i don't think it's true say never happens. true to say it never happens. i'm does happen. there true to say it never happens. i'm court does happen. there true to say it never happens. i'm court cases; happen. there true to say it never happens. i'm court cases that pen. there true to say it never happens. i'm court cases that get. there true to say it never happens. i'm court cases that get brought true to say it never happens. i'm lyout cases that get brought true to say it never happens. i'm lyou findas that get brought true to say it never happens. i'm you find out1at get brought true to say it never happens. i'm you find out1at git brought and you find out that it happened, but nowhere near enough data. enough. enough to skew the data. enough. you to look at other you do have to look at other factors about many hours you work. >> well, it's about jobs that you mean, women you choose. i mean, women are more you choose. i mean, women are more part time more likely to take part time jobs course, jobs as well. and of course, there's the maternity and there's the maternity issue and that point, i was that actually that point, i was thinking this story, the thinking about this story, the idea that somehow the small subset who are trans subset of people who are trans would somehow be massive earners. >> are you sure that this is going to skew the data that much? >> well, maybe maybe it wouldn't. but isn't it sort of the principle of the thing?

>> yeah, it is. you're sort of vaguely mocking me there. you think same. just think the exact same. you just expressed more genteel. is expressed it in more genteel. is that right? yeah. that exact that right? yeah. that is exact same a nicer way. no. same as said in a nicer way. no. it's ridiculous. by the way, it's ridiculous. and by the way, the government equalities office, at that and just the government equalities officeof at that and just the government equalities officeof emilei. and just the government equalities officeof emilei. ind just the government equalities officeof emilei. i justht think of javier milei. i just think of javier milei. i just think get rid of all think afuera, get rid of all these useless departments doing nonsense. say. nonsense. that's what i say. >> to quote >> nick is starting to quote javier now, which is javier milei now, which is fantastic. right, move fantastic. all right, let's move on. uh, metro on. now we've got the, uh, metro . now, i know it's a paper review, but we'll make an exception . what? what are exception today. what? what are they doing? um, i feel shamed about this that you've given it to me. >> fat busting balloon pills on nhs. you saying? >> fat busting balloon pills on nh1why you saying? >> fat busting balloon pills on nh1why would you saying? >> fat busting balloon pills on nh1why would you feel1g? >> fat busting balloon pills on nh1why would you feel it? >> why would you feel it? >> why would you feel it? >> no, no, i'm not crime. >> no, no, i'm not hate crime. >>— >> no, no, i'm not hate crime. >> you look svelte gorgeous . >> you look svelte and gorgeous. >> you look svelte and gorgeous. >> i'll take carry on them. >> i'll take it. carry on them. yep. so there's a new fat busting pill. but it's not like a normal pill. and we've already got pills the ozempic and got pills like the ozempic and all suppose, are all that, i suppose, are injections. but we've got drugs that you thin. that will make you thin. yes, but can't afford but for those who can't afford it, most people, um, it, which is most people, um, because spend the because they spend all the money on food, this option of on food, you have this option of a that will expand in your a pill that will expand in your stomach, become it fills your

stomach. eat less? yes, stomach. so you eat less? yes, but the word pill really does not it's not do it. service because it's attached that they put attached to a pipe that they put the water through pipe. the water through the pipe. so no pipe. like no one wants a pipe. it's like having your stomach pumped, but it down there. but it all is kept down there. but it all is kept down there. but it doesn't involve invasive surgery, is a surgery, so that is a huge i mean, a people are mean, a lot of people are wanting get gastric bands and wanting to get gastric bands and things wanting to get gastric bands and thirthe fear that you have to >> the fear is that you have to go under the knife and that's not very pleasant. this at least alleviates of it. alleviates that element of it. yeah. mean, the thing yeah. i mean, i think the thing about that about this stuff, nick, is that obviously and all obviously even ozempic and all of it doesn't of that, it doesn't just magically the magically make the fat disappear, your disappear, it restrains your appetite. you want appetite. and so you don't want to it as much. and this to eat it as much. and this balloon surely work. isn't balloon would surely work. isn't this a thing? this a good thing? >> i'm very worried about >> well, i'm very worried about the some of the side effects of some of these i don't what these drugs. i don't know what i can say getting can legally say without getting sued, but some of them have side effects. disturbs effects. this one. what disturbs me this is a 15 me about this is it's a 15 minute visit. i don't minute doctor's visit. i don't trust that quick when minute doctor's visit. i don't tr|comes that quick when minute doctor's visit. i don't tr|comes to that quick when minute doctor's visit. i don't tr|comes to weight quick when minute doctor's visit. i don't tr|comes to weight loss.. when minute doctor's visit. i don't tr|comes to weight loss. likeen it comes to weight loss. like i lost a stone last year, but lost over a stone last year, but i slowly that i did it so slowly that i received compliments. if you received no compliments. if you do really slowly, no one do it really slowly, no one notices. but things time notices. but things take time like you know? like this. it's dire, you know? i'm suspicious of you going to a doctor's office. 15 minutes. he blows and sticks it

blows up a balloon and sticks it or sticks it your gut and or sticks it in your gut and then becomes a balloon. the then it becomes a balloon. the whole thing sits wrong. >> lose the >> probably would lose the weight very quickly. but weight very, very quickly. but as you probably isn't as you say, it probably isn't very healthy. as you say, it probably isn't venltiealthy. as you say, it probably isn't venlt doesn't it does >> it doesn't sound like it does it layman. it to the layman. >> we're saying >> most nights we're saying there's story about single there's some story about single use plastics in the human body. yeah, you go and get yeah, and now you can go and get onei know, is it just that we're >> i know, is it just that we're too impatient and we just want things now, or don't to things now, or we don't want to do nick says? just do a do what nick says? just do a gradual program. gradual weight loss program. we want lose weight immediately, want to lose weight immediately, you know? >> elm- e but that >> oh yeah. no, but that actually because >> oh yeah. no, but that actuallizard because >> oh yeah. no, but that actuallizard brain because >> oh yeah. no, but that actuallizard brain versus:ause >> oh yeah. no, but that actuallizard brain versus thee that's lizard brain versus the rest. eating will rest. like eating some food will feel now, takes feel great now, but it takes a year to weight. i'll year to lose weight. well, i'll eat fair enough. eat food then. fair enough. >> okay. going to move >> okay. we're going to move on. finally, this section to the finally, in this section to the daily star. nick, very important breaking this in, >> glad you squeeze this in, andrew. we're attacking the there's bombings yemen and there's bombings in yemen and we've lords. we've got the house of lords. but the papers get but but the papers didn't get those got those in time. so they've got who's potty mouth who's a pretty potty mouth boy then. eight potty then. yeah and it's eight potty mouth parrots have been introduced of nearly introduced to a flock of nearly 100 and 100 african greys, and apparently chaos apparently it's just chaos ensued. haven't really i ensued. i haven't really i haven't looked, i only just got the story. andrew so i haven't investigated the

investigated it in the depth i would but i think would like, but i think it's swearing parrots, swearing parrots, i mean parrots, you know, learn know, they can learn swear words. them. who words. they can learn them. who taught them? that's the big question to but question we need to know. but you bringing you would. why are they bringing them country? them into this country? >> had a parrot, the >> if you had a parrot, the words teach it would be >> if you had a parrot, the worwords teach it would be >> if you had a parrot, the worwords that ach it would be >> if you had a parrot, the worwords that ach it vembarrass the words that would embarrass your it? yeah, your guests, wouldn't it? yeah, yeah. >> there is a bigger worry here, though, got though, because you've got the this gobby. though, because you've got the this swear. gobby. though, because you've got the this swear. he'll gobby. though, because you've got the this swear. he'll say>bby. though, because you've got the this swear. he'll say bad he'll swear. he'll say bad things. being to things. being introduced to african . to african greys. going to be racist. okay. >> fair enough. you >> well okay. fair enough. you remember episode twin remember that episode of twin peaks parrot the peaks where the parrot or the talking the last talking bird was the last witness to murder, and it witness to the murder, and so it gets assassinated it gets assassinated because it might speak identity of the might speak the identity of the killer. so that's an interesting that's a bit of a flashback there. anyway that is the end of there. anyway that is the end of the first section. stay with us for part two. we're going to be looking state solution looking at a two state solution that israel may or may not be involved in. we're also going to look at keir starmer thoughts on solving , something solving knife crime, something to do with barn dancing. think to do with barn dancing. i think , the latest on bbc , and the latest on bbc impartiality.

to gb news radio.

>> welcome back to headliners. your first look at tuesday's newspapers . i'm still andrew newspapers. i'm still andrew doyle obviously i'm joined here by steve n allen and nick dixon. the dream team . and we're going the dream team. and we're going to start this section with tuesday's telegraph. steve, an eu diplomat building his party up. what's all this about? >> solution be >> two state solution can be drawn without israel at the drawn up without israel at the table, says eu diplomat. because european countries deciding how other nations should be sliced up has always gone well. so why not to the classics? not go back to the classics? well you know, that's how israel started, of course. so this will solve so there's a tradition solve it. so there's a tradition here. solve it. so there's a tradition heryeah. should observe >> yeah. you should observe european union will press ahead even if you don't have israel at the talks. >> now let's just do the mocking before get the detail. before we get into the detail. that's why you that's ridiculous. why would you have don't have peace talks where you don't have peace talks where you don't have there? in that have the parties there? in that case, sort out the case, i could sort out the romulans and the klingons, you know you could, know what i mean. you could, however, is kind of the however, there is kind of the point is you expect point is that you can't expect nafions point is that you can't expect nations talking that much nations to be talking that much about the middle of a

about peace in the middle of a war point, not even the war at this point, not even the middle point middle of the war at this point of so the eu want to be of the war. so the eu want to be prepared and have plans. it's not about peace talks. it's about peace plans. >> you these >> but how do you make these plans when both parties in the conflict refuse, choose to entertain of a entertain the notion of a two state solution? >> yeah. mean , don't. the >> yeah. i mean, you don't. the point maybe be the point would be maybe be the conflict hits a stage when the negotiations about a two state solution come the table, solution come back on the table, and then the eu go boom. look what we've already signed that i mean, certainly, uh if is mean, certainly, uh, if there is a palestinian state, have a palestinian state, they have to do than hamas. to do better than hamas. >> that has to go, >> i mean, that has to go, doesn't you know, we doesn't it? so, you know, we what do? i mean, how what would you do? i mean, how would you even begin? >> yeah. is in the >> yeah. and that is in the story. kind of you can miss story. it's kind of you can miss that because it's the that because it's not the headline. the headline. but yeah, the palestinians would need a revitalised political alternative that alternative to hamas. so that is clear there. yeah. the clear in there. yeah. but the emphasis you is sort of is emphasis you feel is sort of is a like a touch anti—israel. i feel like that's the way the world's going. you've got the with that's the way the world's going. and've got the with that's the way the world's going.and would the with that's the way the world's going.and would be; with that's the way the world's going. and would be very with biden and would be very different you've got different with trump. you've got france. more with france. oh, i agree more with germany. who saying here germany. who was saying here can we have without we really have this without israel? know, just just not israel? you know, just just not involving bit off. involving them seems a bit off.

just pressure them just putting pressure on them does bh just putting pressure on them does bit strange me as does seem a bit strange to me as a layman. >> but think, though >> but do you think, though nick, netanyahu is nick, that because netanyahu is being obe in israel, it being terribly obe in israel, it doesn't look like he's going to last long? would last particularly long? would a two state solution then become viable successor? viable with his successor? >> it might. do you feel this is a little too soon after october 7th to just be sort of openly, i suppose. 7th to just be sort of openly, i suppose . look, everyone wants suppose. look, everyone wants the war to stop . yes. it just the war to stop. yes. it just bothered me a little bit. i mean, it says here there were wider complaints over the eu's insistence that peace talks would not address how to deal with by hamas with the terror attacks by hamas on october 7th. that on and since october 7th. that seems a sticking point seems a bit of a sticking point to well. yeah, it should to me as well. yeah, it should be. i understand once netanyahu's saying netanyahu's gone, you're saying there's opportunity for there's an opportunity for if for leader then for less hawkish leader and then you get two. you get a two. >> might if netanyahu >> you might have if netanyahu steps hamas been steps down and hamas have been obliterated then obliterated or disband, then there might be opportunities that might, uh open what do that might, uh, open up. what do you think? >> there'll argument >> and there'll be an argument that you wait for that actually you could wait for that actually you could wait for that moment to happen rather than empty chairing israel. now yeah, that does have a bad vibe. >> an internal document, >> it's an internal document, isn't but somehow

isn't it? but we somehow all know i mean, also know about it. i mean, but also what eu ever made what have the eu ever made better? they can't better? i mean, they can't actually get people to stay within are the within the eu. are they the people be chairing? people you want to be chairing? >> international no, >> international peace? no, that's point. that's a very good point. they're ones trust they're not the ones i trust particularly anything, particularly on anything, frankly. to frankly. let's move on to the latest rochdale grooming latest on the rochdale grooming scandal. this the sun, nick. >> well, this is absolutely horrible. so rochdale grooming gang ringleader still living in city he abused kids nine city where he abused kids nine years after losing right to remain in uk. and this is kareem abdul rauf, 54, was part of a nine strong gang of asian men. never useful just using the word asian. they're convicted of sex offences against vulnerable girls 2012. to 47 girls as girls in 2012. up to 47 girls as young 12 with alcohol young as 12 plied with alcohol and and gang raped, which and drugs and gang raped, which i'm everyone knows by now. i'm sure everyone knows by now. but got six years in but this guy got six years in prison. but he actually only served and six months served two years and six months was released. theresa may said he should back he should be sent back to pakistan conducive to the public he should be sent back to pakistabsolutely/e to the public he should be sent back to pakistabsolutely but» the public he should be sent back to pakistabsolutely but» thehelblic good. absolutely but no. he lives in a three bedroom semi—detached house and he got a 13 old girl pregnant and 13 year old girl pregnant and he's managed to stay because of legal nonsense . human rights. legal nonsense. human rights. i was going to ask. >> was about it must be the

>> it was about it must be the appeal or something appeal system or something that's holding it up. mean, that's holding it up. i mean, if the the time, the home secretary of the time, steve, that he's got go steve, said that he's got to go if the appeals that he's put in have been rejected, which they have been rejected, which they have been rejected, which they have been , clearly he . shouldn't have been, clearly he. shouldn't be here. >> the system is failing, isn't it? i don't know how you fix it. whether you have like one appeal and get to appeal from and then you get to appeal from not anymore, which not being here anymore, which actually some sense to actually has got some sense to it. thing really sticks it. the thing that really sticks out, guy did, out, given what this guy did, the based on the human the appeal is based on the human rights, because the right to a family, he's he's got a family, because he's he's got a wife and children. yeah. do you know what probably should have thought about that doing thought about that before doing the in the first place? the stuff in the first place? well, can you claim well, yeah. how can you claim that your right to a family is well, yeah. how can you claim thatthing right to a family is well, yeah. how can you claim thatthing that: to a family is well, yeah. how can you claim thatthing that keeps amily is well, yeah. how can you claim thatthing that keeps you y is well, yeah. how can you claim thatthing that keeps you here the thing that keeps you here when you've done, when when look what you've done, when you've obliterated other people's their freedoms. lives and their freedoms. >> shocking stuff. >> absolutely shocking stuff. okay, well, going to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to well, going to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to thisl, going to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to this story going to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to this story ingoing to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to this story in theg to move >> absolutely shocking stuff. ok to this story in the mirrorove on to this story in the mirror about knife crime. jolly about knife crime. another jolly topic. one, steve? about knife crime. another jolly top kids, one, steve? about knife crime. another jolly top kids, to one, steve? about knife crime. another jolly top kids, to be one, steve? about knife crime. another jolly top kids, to be encouragedfe? about knife crime. another jolly top kids, to be encouraged to >> kids, to be encouraged to play >> kids, to be encouraged to play sport under keir starmer plan to cut knife crime. now that makes you think like they won't be stabbing because their

arms ache too much. no it's a long it? um, but an long shot, isn't it? um, but an he even says that community long shot, isn't it? um, but an he eve|will's that community long shot, isn't it? um, but an he eve|will be hat community long shot, isn't it? um, but an he eve|will be vital. mmunity long shot, isn't it? um, but an he eve|will be vital. butunity long shot, isn't it? um, but an he eve|will be vital. but even groups will be vital. but even though this is this is the mirror, should be loving mirror, they should be loving keir starmer the way it's written bit like, oh, keir starmer the way it's writ'think bit like, oh, keir starmer the way it's writ'think sports bit like, oh, keir starmer the way it's writ'think sports daysike, oh, keir starmer the way it's writ'think sports days will)h, keir starmer the way it's writ'think sports days will fix you think sports days will fix it? it's more children it? it's more about children without things but without things to do. but. but could correlation here? >> is it the case that there are youths, gangs of youths who have nothing that actually nothing to do and that actually community nothing to do and that actually comm bitty nothing to do and that actually comm bit of table tennis know, bit of table tennis something might distract them? yeah. >> i mean that, that is a good that's better point than some that's a better point than some of things that are made in of the things that are made in here. gives a shout out here. um, he gives a shout out to wolverhampton wrestling club because that'll the because that'll sort out the gang feud. is there something to it, won't for stabbing. >> table tennis also is too near . what you need is a sport where you're far away, like you're very far away, like tennis. very hard stab. tennis. very hard to stab. someone over the net. someone can't get over the net. you can them coming a mile. you can see them coming a mile. uh most uh fence fencing is the most dangerous. certain to get dangerous. almost certain to get stabbed so i am stabbed in fencing. so i am making of only because making light of it. only because it's absurd article, and it's such an absurd article, and it's such an absurd article, and it's ridiculous. it's kind of ridiculous. >> what be >> what is what can be done? i mean, it not the case mean, is it not the case that young in particular need young men in particular need things to with their time,

things to do with their time, and enjoy bit and they also enjoy a bit of rivalry, don't and rivalry, don't they? and when you don't have competitive sports, of things sports, those kind of things have kind of been eliminated largely from and sense have kind of been eliminated la|community, and sense have kind of been eliminated la|community, which and sense have kind of been eliminated la|community, which and getense of community, which you get from community groups as well. >> um, whilst making >> um, whilst we are making light just pointing out light and just pointing out small leader small details, the labour leader says he wants to tackle says that he wants to tackle knife halve violence knife crime and halve violence against women and girls. why put i here moaning about the i sit here moaning about the vagueness stop the boats? but vagueness of stop the boats? but why specifically say i think there's a certain level that's okay. just about half what we got. >> just do it all while you're making stuff up. i'll take it all out. half yeah. >> the whole lot. some ambition? >> you're gonna make up a number, say something like 37. don't >> right. we're going on >> right. we're going to move on to guardian. to tuesday's guardian. now, nick and the government trying to and the government are trying to stay bias . stay neutral about bias. >> yeah, is downing street. >> yeah, this is downing street. denies having anti—bbc agenda after accusations. so lucy after bias accusations. so lucy frazer was sort of grilled on this. and she said that look the bbc tends to be has a problem with impartiality. but she was kind of cornered on it and she ended up saying, well, look,

people perceive as a problem and that's she said. there that's enough. she said. there are perceptions are only perceptions and perceptions are important. so she kind she was backed into a kind of descartes sort of defence of solipsism. quite strange. descartes sort of defence of solijthen. quite strange. descartes sort of defence of solijthen. waste strange. descartes sort of defence of solijthen. was pressed e. descartes sort of defence of solijthen. was pressed to give and then she was pressed to give actual examples annoyingly actual examples and annoyingly for me anyway, she for us or me anyway, she couldn't really give any. she kept citing the attack on the hospital in gaza one example, hospital in gaza as one example, but were so many she could but there were so many she could have have gone have given, she could have gone brexit. have brexit. she could have gone lockdown, gone lockdown, she could have gone vaccine, could have gone the vaccine, she could have gone the whole of verify, which is an whole of bbc verify, which is an absurd gone absurd joke. she could have gone failing to call hamas a terrorist organisation. she could emily maitlis could have gone emily maitlis entire career. she have entire career. she could have gone. laughing about entire career. she could have gone.johnson laughing about entire career. she could have gone.johnson another] about boris johnson was another classic are so classic example. so there are so many. it's not that hard. >> so it's actually the she >> so it's actually the one she gave. pretty good. gave. i think is pretty good. it's only had one, but it's good she only had one, but the hospital issue, they the hamas hospital issue, they trusted wasn't a trusted her. it wasn't just a mistake saw mistake because i saw the interview i think the interview and i think the interviewer was it, burley interviewer was it, kay burley said a said that it was a was a mistake. that's just a mistake. it's not just a mistake. when you that the israeli, the it's not just a mistake. when you are that the israeli, the it's not just a mistake. when you are targeting israeli, the it's not just a mistake. when you are targeting medical�*ne it's not just a mistake. when you are targeting medical staff . idf are targeting medical staff. so that wasn't a mistake. that would slip through. what i'm saying is the only reason got saying is the only reason it got through because is evidence saying is the only reason it got th|bias, because is evidence saying is the only reason it got

th|bias, quite :ause is evidence saying is the only reason it got th|bias, quite severe; evidence saying is the only reason it got th|bias, quite severe bias. ence of bias, quite severe bias. i would say. >> but the actual bbc >> but but the actual bbc guidelines mean that that was bad journalism, not bad journalism, that was not sticking to the guidelines on getting to verify getting two sources to verify the information for you. go with it. the bbc already has it. so the bbc already has guidelines place stop that guidelines in place to stop that happening, right. means it happening, right. which means it should shouldn't be speaking to its now could its bias. now you could then make argument, well, why did make an argument, well, why did it maybe the it get through? right. maybe the bias, the or they already bias, but the or they already have the system in place to prevent the. >> but what about all of the things that nick mentioned? >> yeah, i mean look, uh, the i just love this story for actually, uh, making the government whether their actually, uh, making the gove against whether their actually, uh, making the gove against the whether their actually, uh, making the gove against the bbc, hether their actually, uh, making the goveagainst the bbc, we're their actually, uh, making the goveagainst the bbc, we're inieir bias against the bbc, we're in this war of, like, you're biased. you're your biased. no, you're by your bias about how you about my bias. how dare you be biased about bias? >> other part of this is >> the other part of this is really is, though, is really important is, though, is ofcom given more powers ofcom will be given more powers to investigate bbc and you to investigate the bbc and you 90, to investigate the bbc and you go, bants while go, okay, that's bants while we're investigating the bbc and we've got the allegedly conservative government, it's kind amusing, kind of kind of mildly amusing, but horrific but it's going to be horrific when either this government, frankly, especially labour, frankly, or especially labour, get of powers, start get hold of these powers, start using limit free speech using them to limit free speech onune using them to limit free speech online we know going happen. >> n happen. >> i mean, if someone >> but also, i mean, if someone

complains the bbc, you complains about the bbc, you can't directly to can't complain directly to ofcom. to complain to ofcom. you have to complain to the decide whether the bbc and they decide whether they will pass your complaint on to ofcom. surely that's a to ofcom. yeah surely that's a ridiculous system. to ofcom. yeah surely that's a ridiyeah,; system. to ofcom. yeah surely that's a ridiyeah, but.tem. to ofcom. yeah surely that's a ridiyeah, but.tethey don't, if >> yeah, but if they don't, if you're satisfied that you're not satisfied with that complaint, you can take it further . yes. further. yes. >> okay. further. yes. >> you y. further. yes. >> you just have jump through >> you just have to jump through that >> you just have to jump through tha speaking >> you just have to jump through thaspeaking impartiality, >> speaking of impartiality, though, most though, it's not the most impartial. i'd complain impartial. i'd like to complain about bbc. the. hello? about the bbc. where the. hello? yes, bbc is completely absurd. >> i mean, the issue. i >> i mean, isn't the issue. i mean, i've always mean, i've, i've always maintained is quite hard maintained that it is quite hard for the bbc to remain politically non—partisan . it's politically non—partisan. it's actually difficult tightrope actually a difficult tightrope to cross. and i don't, you know , to cross. and i don't, you know, i don't want to bash them for that because i do think it's hard. other hand, i think hard. on the other hand, i think they continually they have continually and singularly when comes they have continually and sirthe arly when comes they have continually and sirthe culture when comes they have continually and sirthe culture war/hen comes they have continually and sirthe culture war issues. comes to the culture war issues. they're clearly on side. they're clearly on one side. they're clearly on one side. they have policy laws they're clearly on one side. theyare ve policy laws they're clearly on one side. theyare on policy laws they're clearly on one side. theyare on one policy laws they're clearly on one side. theyare on one side,licy laws they're clearly on one side. theyare on one side, they aws that are on one side, they have guidelines about how you shouldn't misgender rapists and criminals. very criminals. that is taking a very firm side on the culture war. and that's in written that's a written document i've seen. >> i mean, i've worked i've worked at the bbc and seen people over backwards to people bending over backwards to try but the try and not be biased. but the problem how do spot your

problem is, how do you spot your own problem own biases, right? the problem is recruits from is the bbc recruits from such a small group, from society, there'll some biases they there'll be some biases they don't they've so they don't know they've got, so they can't check. >> well, i think they're pretty clear should do clear and maybe they should do something about it. anyway, that's part but that's the end of part two. but coming to teach coming up, labour wants to teach kids privilege. the kids about white privilege. the boarding that's letting kids about white privilege. the boar�*sleep that's letting kids about white privilege. the boar�*sleep in that's letting kids about white privilege. the boar�*sleep in the hat's letting kids about white privilege. the boar�*sleep in the hat's |of:ing kids about white privilege. the boar�*sleep in the hat's |of their kids sleep in the dorm of their choice, and one woman's very disappointing experience of the nhs. you a

we have a sluggish economy . we have a sluggish economy. earlier on, gb news radio . earlier on, gb news radio. >> welcome back to headliners. your first look at tuesday's newspapers . i'm andrew doyle newspapers. i'm andrew doyle still here with steve and alan and nick dixon . nick, we're and nick dixon. nick, we're going to start with the telegraph story about late abortions. what's this? >> yes, another moral minefield for me here. late abortions should not be reported to police. medics urge. so the royal college of gynaecologists and obstetricians have may i may have said that right have issued its first official guidance on have said that right have issued its 1issue fficial guidance on have said that right have issued its tissue and l guidance on have said that right have issued its tissue and it's|idance on have said that right have issued its tissue and it's quitee on the issue and it's quite strange. they're claiming that

nhs shouldn't report it. nhs staff shouldn't report it. a late abortion . and because the late abortion. and because the idea is it's if they don't have to report it unless it's in the pubuc to report it unless it's in the public interest, right. so they're able to breach confidentiality rules to give information police about information to police about possible crimes , which of course possible crimes, which of course makes abortion is but only if makes an abortion is but only if it's in the public interest, which introduces an element of ambiguity. problem here ambiguity. but the problem here is that a lot of the times, if you're reporting something like is that a lot of the times, if you'r> i suppose it's quicker >> yes, i suppose it's quicker to way , because the to do it this way, because the idea slowly trying to change idea of slowly trying to change

this law, the law that's been around since 18, whenever it was, and the law was, um, but clearly and the law has some good reason to it. so it would be hard move the it would be hard to move the law. what they're trying it would be hard to move the laisay what they're trying it would be hard to move the laisay is what they're trying it would be hard to move the laisay is make at they're trying it would be hard to move the laisay is make somey're trying it would be hard to move the laisay is make some sorttrying it would be hard to move the laisay is make some sort ofing to say is make some sort of judgement, aren't they then judgement, but aren't they then overriding of the overriding the sort of the legal. well, no, because it's not saying is a law. you not saying this is a law. you always report because we always report it because as we find medics don't have find out, the medics don't have to breaking laws . to report all breaking of laws. right? if i to report all breaking of laws. right? if i turn up to the doctors with a sore wrist and say it's because of all the illegal films they've been downloading, can't breach illegal films they've been dovtconfidentiality can't breach illegal films they've been dovtconfidentiality aboutbreach illegal films they've been dovt confidentiality about that, �*i my confidentiality about that, right? whereas about this, right? whereas it's about this, this interest side . this public interest side. >> but one reason it's illegal is because because it's unsafe. >> but one reason it's illegal is wasause because it's unsafe. >> but one reason it's illegal is was 1861.)ecause it's unsafe. >> but one reason it's illegal is was 1861. you're; it's unsafe. >> but one reason it's illegal is was 1861. you're suggestingi. it was 1861. you're suggesting it's some sort of ancient, silly victorian patriarchal but victorian patriarchal law, but it's unsafe, just that it's actually unsafe, just that it's actually unsafe, just that it would be harder. it's actually unsafe, just that it vino,:l be harder. it's actually unsafe, just that it vtno, i be harder. it's actually unsafe, just that it vtno, i think rder. it's actually unsafe, just that it vtno, i think iier. it's actually unsafe, just that it vtno, i think i said it. >> no, i think i said it. there's some good to this law, but for such a but it's been around for such a long time, it will be a slow process to change it. it's quicker advice to the quicker to give advice to the people the medical industry. people in the medical industry. >> a minefield >> it does seem like a minefield to me. anyway, let's move on. steve independent. steve to tuesday's independent. now labour planning to teach children , children about white privilege, which surprised. um so

which i'm not surprised. um so thangam debbonaire, who has name privilege beautiful, isn't it? >> says that children need the opportunity to ask difficult questions sometimes of our nation's history. they do have that, don't they ? true. but also that, don't they? true. but also nofice that, don't they? true. but also notice how different that is to saying, you know what we should be about white be teaching lots about white privilege. in privilege. so let's dive in and see has said , has she see where has she said, has she actually said that? no. which bit white privilege? no. bit about white privilege? no. that's point. the that's the point. oh, the headune that's the point. oh, the headline all she's all headline is all about she's all wanting to get some white privilege being there. privilege being taught there. yes. asked yes. she was actually asked about barnardos that that about it. barnardos that that um, published online guides for parents that mentioned and talked about white privilege. but if her point of view is saying you need to be able to talk about these things, you need to be able to ask a difficult questions. that is very different if if very different from if you if you think white privilege a you think white privilege is a thing taught as thing that should be taught as an fact and it needs an immutable fact and it needs to be used to up white to be used to beat up white people, that's different people, that's very different from everyone has from saying, look, everyone has privilege the privilege in different. so the problem with that, steve, is that so many school that there are so many school boards and educational bodies that fact , teaching white

that are in fact, teaching white privilege and aspects of critical race theory as though they were fact. >> that's going on under the tories . i'm not sure i trust to tories. i'm not sure i trust to labour deal with that . labour deal with that. >> oh, but i can't remember the name of the logical fallacy there. but what you've done is let her point has not agreed with your worry. no, she has not said the thing you're worried about, but you've said i'm about, but you've just said i'm actually all i'm all i'm. >> i'm doing is >> no, no. all i'm doing is raising that supplementary point. case that point. yeah. is it the case that the existing problem we have with white privilege being taught irrespective taught in schools, irrespective of says, it of what debbonaire says, is it the case that labour will be well equipped to deal with it? >> possibly do we >> well, uh, possibly not. do we know they make it know that they will make it worse? not. so we're worse? possibly not. so we're a bit of a tricky thing. the interesting thing to interesting thing i wanted to point that, um , uh, the point out is that, um, uh, the culture secretary, lucy frazer, said that the idea white said that the idea of white privilege and not privilege is a debate and not a fact, but then what we had from debbonaire was saying a debate, asking questions. i don't even think these two people agree. now, that's point. now, maybe that's your point. saying they don't disagree. saying that they don't disagree. and problem no and it's a problem because no one's problem.

and it's a problem because no one nick, problem. and it's a problem because no one nick, maybe problem. and it's a problem because no one nick, maybe youiblem. step >> nick, maybe you should step in solve i will in and solve this. i will firstly never accuse andrew doyle of a logical fallacy. >> you've seen the people on x get crushed day after day, never works, would never do that. works, so i would never do that. secondly, don't understand works, so i would never do that. secondeoint. n't understand works, so i would never do that. secondeoint. it: understand works, so i would never do that. secondeoint. it seemsstand works, so i would never do that. secondeoint. it seems like! works, so i would never do that. secondeoint. it seems like a steve's point. it seems like a distinction without a difference. about difference. she was asked about barnardo's about white barnardo's guide about white privilege. white privilege. teach your white friends, colleagues privilege. teach your white friend�*their colleagues privilege. teach your white friend�*their privilege.»lleagues privilege. teach your white friend�*their privilege. so agues privilege. teach your white friend�*their privilege. so shees privilege. teach your white friend�*their privilege. so she is about their privilege. so she is coming on that. understand about their privilege. so she is conpointn that. understand about their privilege. so she is conpoint there, understand about their privilege. so she is conpoint there, but understand about their privilege. so she is conpoint there, but well,arstand about their privilege. so she is conpoint there, but well, canind the point there, but well, can i jump jump in? >> answer that. i think >> yes, answer that. i think what saying that what she's saying is that shouldn't stopped. you shouldn't be stopped. do you think that the mentioning of white privilege literature white privilege in literature sent should be sent to parents should be stopped? don't think it stopped? no, i don't think it should banned. should be banned. >> argument is >> so my argument here is she's saying no questioning is good. my saying no questioning is good. my following my argument is that following white is white privilege doctrine is unlikely questioning in unlikely to be questioning in the it's more the current context. it's more likely following cult likely to be following a cult doctrine. questioning would be saying that saying in this context that we're in a school or we're in now in a school or something, saying something we're in now in a school or somewhat , saying something we're in now in a school or somewhat about|g something we're in now in a school or somewhat about theimething we're in now in a school or somewhat about the amount| we're in now in a school or somewhat about the amount of like, what about the amount of poor white that go to poor white boys that don't go to university? or, you know, why don't ever talk the don't we ever talk about the ottoman those ottoman empire, those things? why transatlantic ottoman empire, those things? why trade? transatlantic ottoman empire, those things? why trade? we ansatlantic ottoman empire, those things? why trade? we endedintic ottoman empire, those things? why trade? we ended it.c ottoman empire, those things? why trade? we ended it. by slave trade? and we ended it. by the way, you don't hear that. you hear one narrative. so questioning would be question

you hear one narrative. so quewhiteig would be question you hear one narrative. so quewhite privilege.)e question you hear one narrative. so quelvhite privilege.)e question you hear one narrative. so quelvhitejthat'sje.)e question you hear one narrative. so quelvhite [that's an e question you hear one narrative. so quelvhite [that's an interesting)n >> i think that's an interesting point. would would be point. it would be it would be interesting follow up interesting to have a follow up question debbonaire say, question to debbonaire and say, would the idea would you be happy with the idea of do so many people of saying, why do so many people teach the concept white teach the concept of white privilege an privilege as though it's an uncontested fact in schools? having question, having asking that question, that interesting that would be an interesting question. >> and until that >> and until we get that question nick, question answered, nick, you've ended with ended up agreeing with debbonaire want difficult debbonaire have i want difficult questions until questions to be asked. so until you out which questions, you find out which questions, you'll generous in your you'll be very generous in your interpretation of what is gaslighting us into pretending she wants critical thought when she wants critical thought when she doesn't for she doesn't get ready for a labour government, it's going she doesn't get ready for a lalhell.|overnment, it's going be hell. >> well, maybe she a major >> well, maybe she is a major critical right, critical thinker. you're right, there's one there's no evidence here. one way other, but just way or the other, but i just have my doubts, to be honest. let's move on to this story. daily mail, nick boarding school doubung daily mail, nick boarding school doubling down on its position on trans pupils. this i find absolutely amazing. yeah >> us boarding school. it charges 45,000 a year and taught lily allen and daniel day—lewis refuses back down over plans refuses to back down over plans to let trans people in to let trans people stay in dorms their preferred gender, dorms of their preferred gender, declaring all young declaring we treat all our young people very long people as individuals very long headline. but the point is,

there's just the whole story, really. good. it's really. so that's good. it's done is done it for me. this is beadle's, and it's beadle's, of course, and it's completely we treat them completely absurd. we treat them as they're going as individuals so they're going against and all against all protocol and all safety really? safety and all sanity. really? >> a boy who says >> so wait, so a boy who says he's will be able to he's a girl will be able to sleep a dorm, actually can sleep in a dorm, actually can sleep in a dorm, actually can sleep in a dorm, actually can sleep in a dorm at bedales with girls. that's okay, because sleep in a dorm at bedales with girls personiat's okay, because sleep in a dorm at bedales with girlsperson is 's okay, because sleep in a dorm at bedales with girlsperson is anikay, because sleep in a dorm at bedales with girlsperson is an individual, se that person is an individual, andrew, gender or andrew, with no gender or biological sex, are they not individual other individuals in that who might be a little that dorm who might be a little worried about that? >> that's true. they're individuals but individuals as well. but they don't individuals as well. but they dont as individuals as well. but they don't as this. don't matter as much as this. it's . you've almost it's confusing. you've almost found flaw whole found a flaw in this whole argument. all my argument. i'm rethinking all my life choices, but one thing that's notable here, you say you're amazed, but actually, as you've often you've pointed out often yourself, elite yourself, it's the elite schools. that schools. it's the poshest that go along the woke stuff. go along with the woke stuff. the woke is an elite phenomenon. >> it's always the posh stuff. but is a major but steve, this is a major safeguarding risk. course. safeguarding risk. of course. now government's now the government's introduced its new trans guidance for schools long, long overdue. but the is they haven't said the problem is they haven't said that it's mandatory. and of course that's what they should be um, just let me do the >> yes. um, just let me do the annoying thing finding annoying steve thing of finding the flaw in the story. just a

little bit, just so i can go on. >> i know you need this. this is how you get your kicks. this is what i love. >> the headline, >> yeah. so the headline, because it's daily mail that because it's the daily mail that for reason point for some reason they point out the there as if the celebs that went there as if we're go well, we're going to go like, well, lily allen there, but be lily allen went there, but to be fair, school fair, the boarding school probably quite a lot. probably does that quite a lot. >> they're probably quite proud for lily allen. for some reason of lily allen. so what the headline has, uh, some so what the headline has, uh, sonright. the headline says >> right. the headline says refuses to back plans, refuses to back down over plans, actual clarify actual story refuses to clarify its actually its position. that's actually different. but but but surely now that they've given this now that they've been given this quite guidance, quite clear guidance, they should quite clear guidance, they sho no, of course will >> no, of course we will accommodate the children according biological sex. but according to biological sex. but be right and put that in the headune be right and put that in the headline rather making that headline rather than making that line. a line. actually, now that's a quibble. that's quibble. well, quibble. that's a quibble. well, i'll however, i'll accept, however, however, we sexual assaults we have seen sexual assaults within a case within schools. there's a case going on in loudoun in virginia at a girl was at the moment where a girl was raped in a bathroom by a boy dressed as a girl because he said he was a girl. the parents are currently suing the school for million. not for $30 million. it's not a trivial point. >> no, it's not a trivial point. i half of i was about to my second half of the is to say it's

the nonsense bit is to say it's an unworkable policy. that is, you're say the you're right to say the guidelines already mean it's not allowed. so if any parent surely just goes hang on a minute, i mean, it'd be nice if you didn't have to make effort of have to make the effort of suing. who does suing. but yes, anyone who does make of action, of make any sort of action, part of me it's an unworkable me thinks it's an unworkable policy. the policy signals policy. but the policy signals a virtue. so it's almost as if they never want it to be used, but they want to have on their brochure look what we offer. >> well, one of the arguments, they is that, well, they always say is that, well, they always say is that, well, the school never the girls at the school never complain. a lot girls know complain. a lot of girls we know are complain. are too nervous to complain. they don't want be perceived they don't want to be perceived as and but actually, as bigots. and but actually, i would that of them would suggest that most of them certainly a male certainly don't want a male undressing in there should be. >> they know they're girls. >> well, there's that if there's no such thing as biological sex, they're individuals. we're all just individuals. okay, let's move the next story. now, move on to the next story. now, this financial times. this is in the financial times. uh, is feminism uh, and steve, is feminism working ? working? >> um, well, not for these men . men? >> oh, i know , don't get me >> oh, i know, don't get me started. the >> have you ever met any. oh, they're terrible. are they? shorter hours for men ads to

strain on uk labour market. it's the article looks at how we've reduced our working hours. the article looks at how we've reduced our working hours . yes. reduced our working hours. yes. in general just the average has gone down from 33.1 in, uh, 98 down to 31.8. doesn't seem like a huge amount. they say that's around 300,000 fewer workers , around 300,000 fewer workers, but still of the whole workforce doesn't seem huge. no, but that's been blamed for a lack of productivity uh, productivity and things. uh, there are reasons why people have worked less younger people there are reasons why people have to>rked less younger people there are reasons why people have to notd less younger people there are reasons why people have to not think, younger people there are reasons why people have to not think, oh,1ger people there are reasons why people have to not think, oh, ijer people there are reasons why people have to not think, oh, i should)le tend to not think, oh, i should give my life away to work. yes and what bothers me give my life away to work. yes and this what bothers me give my life away to work. yes and this story. bothers me give my life away to work. yes and this story. it'shers me give my life away to work. yes and this story. it's all; me give my life away to work. yes and this story. it's all been about this story. it's all been blamed the working less. blamed on the men working less. and we're constantly told and yet we're constantly told that you've got to do something about life balance. you about work life balance. you find hollywood where find a hollywood film where there's a job. the there's a dad with a job. the moral the end it is work moral at the end of it is work less. are you working all less. why are you working all the time? less. why are you working all the time say it's better for you >> they say it's better for you psychologically , you and psychologically, you know, and there have been studies into this that people say that a four day is better you day week is much better for you psychologically five day psychologically than a five day week, you know, and, you know, since pandemic, since the pandemic, a lot of people they people are just deciding they don't at all. don't want to work at all. >> but everyone can take time off. but it's only the blokes

who told working who get told off for working shorter hours. ruining shorter hours. you ruin ruining the economy. >> nick, do you have a view on this? >> e- @ men deserve e—- this? >> we'vezn deserve break. this? >> we've done;erve break. this? >> we've done alle break. this? >> we've done all the break. yeah, we've done all the difficult that rig difficult jobs. that oil rig thing i've seen on x, and you did great job on that. thank thing i've seen on x, and you did yeah.t job on that. thank thing i've seen on x, and you did yeah.tjob on exactly|ank thing i've seen on x, and you did yeah.t job on exactly no; you. yeah. thanks. exactly no one about that. we're out one thinks about that. we're out there day. we're up the there every day. we're up the electricity stuff. electricity poles, fixing stuff. electricity about electricity poles. thinks about the working the men working on the infrastructure. that was jordan peterson. about peterson. no one thinks about the chill for the men we deserve to chill for a who's really at the same a bit. who's really at the same time. i think people time. also, i don't think people should work from home and just do i'm but do nothing. so i'm torn. but mainly i'm men. that's my mainly i'm pro men. that's my stance, allowed to stance, as you know, allowed to work literally, work less because literally, i mean, work all the time. >> it's a thing that kills a lot of men. so let's just work less. >> hear that's why the stats >> i hear that's why the stats show men live as show that men don't live as long. because so long. it's because there's so many die young. many of us that die young. it averages it out. and actually, we do the same we probably do have the same live. literally everything live. it's literally everything kills live. it's literally everything killthough inherited >> though inherited diseases, acquired diseases, accidents, murders, suicide. if there's a way working way of dying, then men working with schaffer. with lewis schaffer. >> that's an absolute >> oh, god, that's an absolute killer . all right, well, look, killer. all right, well, look, just one more section to go in tonight's headliners so do stay

with us. we're going to be talking about foreigners fascination slang, fascination with the uk slang, the clock an the doomsday clock and an unusual bikini model. you don't want go

welcome . back to headliners. welcome. back to headliners. your first look at tuesday's newspapers. and we're going to start this section with the times. and this story is well, goodin times. and this story is well, good in it. fam >> that is my favourite thing. i've witnessed . i was i've ever witnessed. i was worried that me reading out this headline, i wouldn't sound like cool enough, but thanks for setting a bar. >> i is proper ghetto in it. >> i is proper ghetto in it. >> oh dear. >> oh dear. >> actually >> um, that's actually uncomfortable as a joke. uncomfortable even as a joke. >> so the headline is foreigners bear keen to flex by using engush bear keen to flex by using english slang . no cap, but i english slang. no cap, but i feel so much better about it not sounding what is no cap? >> it just does that mean no. no cap lock? >> not lying. >> not lying. >> oh cap. that's true. >> oh no cap. that's true. >> oh no cap. that's true. >> okay. no cap. >> okay. as in no cap. >>— >> okay. as in no cap. >> i no idea what it means. >> i have no idea what it means. >> i have no idea what it means. >> no. me neither. but it's a

survey language teachers survey of language teachers there. apparently, they're asked a are a lot when they. when people are learning they oh, learning english, they go, oh, what's about beef? and what's all this about beef? and they the ones we they don't mean the ones that we know. actually, because it's know. so actually, because it's in it's just a reason in the times, it's just a reason for the times list things for the times to list things that young say. and that young people say. and for us aren't they us to go aren't they weird? >> but isn't it isn't it the case that young people just naturally i naturally learn the slang? i mean, had when i was at mean, we had slang when i was at school, know? mean, we had slang when i was at sch yeah, know? mean, we had slang when i was at schyeah, meant’ mean, we had slang when i was at schyeah, meant learning >> yeah, i meant learning engush a >> yeah, i meant learning english a second language. english as a second language. oh, english, oh, i see it's not english, kids. right. but kids. you're right. but >> but the language >> but even the foreign language kids slang quite kids will learn slang quite naturally. would thought. naturally. i would have thought. yeah, and, you know, they've gone to the effort of making a list of some of the things pop off means go crazy. >> means salty is >> dead means boring. salty is upset. did you not know these, though? >> am i? i knew all them. >> am i? i knew all of them. does that mean on the does that just mean i'm on the internet much? internet too much? >> i bother to >> i thought if i bother to learn these, i will. then be able communicate the able to communicate with the kind who talk like able to communicate with the kind so who talk like able to communicate with the kind so i'm who talk like able to communicate with the kind so i'm probablyalk like able to communicate with the kind so i'm probably fine.ke this. so i'm probably fine. >> but we all had it. i mean, i had up apples and pears had like up the apples and pears for stairs. how old are you? >> me rhyming years old. >> um, in the midlands. m >> um, in the midlands. what do you one? well, you think about this one? well, i the terms, so i'm

i knew all the terms, so i'm thinking this one these thinking this is one of these sort of. >> boom. right oh, you might understand no, understand these terms like. no, i the terms. i know all the terms. >> it's because you're down >> it's just because you're down with kids. with the kids. >> yeah, i've worked out why. it's those it's because i watch those shows. those shows. you know, those clips where like, young women where it's all like, young women saying about saying stupid things about dating. i watch all those and they always say, cap those. >> mean, this mentions riz, >> i mean, this mentions riz, which is the word of the year. i only when i read which is the word of the year. i on|article when i read which is the word of the year. i on|article it.when i read an article about it. >> didn't know no, >> i didn't know what. no, i already that well. already knew that one as well. i think you guys are a bit behind. you're just you need get you're just you need to get on the be bit cooler. >> very lit. >> very lit. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> i think getting the >> i think getting on the internet worst internet more is the worst advice given advice you've ever, ever given me. i need to get off the internet. on to internet. let's move on now to this story on tuesday's mirror. uh, from uh, if you're suffering from more than one illness, then tough this is mum in tears >> yeah, this is mum in tears after only allowed to after only being allowed to report per report one problem per appointment report one problem per aprit'stment report one problem per aprit's atant i this is no it's at gp. i mean, this is absolutely i mean, not absolutely obscene. i mean, not obscene, just nhs, obscene, but it's just our nhs, isn't mean, nhs. look, isn't it? i mean, our nhs. look, lots of hard workers and all that, broken. mean, that, but it's broken. i mean, that, but it's broken. i mean, that draconian. that, but it's broken. i mean, that and draconian. that, but it's broken. i mean, that and they've draconian. that, but it's broken. i mean, that and they've doneinian. that, but it's broken. i mean, that and they've done this. yeah. and they've done this weird justification for it that somehow it's better patient somehow it's better for patient safety or something. it's a

bizarre software. what's the logic here? i didn't see any logic. >> $- logic. >> the kind y the kind of logic. >> the kind of prioritise >> it has the kind of prioritise what because >> it has the kind of prioritise what things because >> it has the kind of prioritise what things are because >> it has the kind of prioritise what things are connected:ause >> it has the kind of prioritise what things are connected .use often things are connected. often things come in pairs. if you're growing horns, will they only one the horns? only treat one of the horns? >> yeah . >> yeah. >> yeah. >> the problem is with with western obviously it's western medicine, obviously it's the you know, the best. and you know, acupuncture can't cure everything. the problem everything. but the problem is it's holistic to use that it's not holistic to use that word. so yeah, they've written we understand that patients may have concerns have multiple concerns and it can to address can be challenging to address them all in a single appointment. by appointment. however, by implementing aim implementing this policy, we aim to provide focussed and comprehensive to each comprehensive care to each patient. no , you patient. what by saying no, you can't that, steve. can't tell me about that, steve. >> appointment >> surely you get an appointment at doctor and that covers at the doctor and that covers all your problems, right? that's how it should be. >> look, understand >> look, i can understand putting a limit maybe five, putting a limit of maybe five, because you know what? some people out, people are like. they miss out, they're back's they're going, oh, my back's playing well. and it's not playing up as well. and it's not been right since the, know, been right since the, you know, oh time. oh i'm tired all the time. >> everyone is tired >> yeah. everyone is tired all the it. but the time. get over it. but you get a limit maybe that get a time limit and maybe that should be the thing that if you're to sit there for you're going to sit there for three about three hours going on about all your then you do your bits, then maybe you do need which need a longer appointment, which you can book for. >> if you book an >> but come on, if you book an appointment you've time

>> but come on, if you book an aptheitment you've time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end nt you've time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end of you've time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end of it, you've time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end of it, then ve time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end of it, then you time >> but come on, if you book an apthe end of it, then you do time at the end of it, then you do surely have the right mention at the end of it, then you do suithereive the right mention at the end of it, then you do suithere are :he right mention at the end of it, then you do suithere are :he many mention at the end of it, then you do suithere are :he many thingstion it. there are so many things that way. this that get caught that way. this is not about safety, is not about patient safety, because safety be because patient safety would be while anything while you're here, anything else that want have while you're here, anything else tilook want have while you're here, anything else tilook at? want have a look at? >> i'm sick and tired of it, you know, it's difficult >> i'm sick and tired of it, you know, to it's difficult >> i'm sick and tired of it, you know, to an; difficult >> i'm sick and tired of it, you know, to an appointment enough to get an appointment now with the problem. >> got to be on for an hour in a queue and the receptionist. queue and then the receptionist. actually, problem is, actually, what the problem is, i've that's i've always thought that's completely not going i've always thought that's co tellztely not going i've always thought that's co tellztely why not going i've always thought that's co tellztely why am not going i've always thought that's co tellztely why am i not going i've always thought that's co tellztely why am i telling ing to tell you. why am i telling you? yeah. >> qualified. you? yeah. >> yeah, qualified. you? yeah. >> yeah, that'squalified. you? yeah. >> yeah, that'squeun—english. >> yeah, that's so un—english. >> yeah, that's so un—english. >> on. now. the >> okay, let's move on. now. the times news for scottish times bad news for scottish dogs. nick. >> smoking raises >> yeah. passive smoking raises risk of cancer in scottish terriers. this a terriers. study finds. this is a big so yeah that's it big story. so yeah that's it really i mean that's what i'm trying to elaborate but there really isn't any more to it. why specifically scottish terriers. >> it's a great question which steve can answer, okay. >> it's a great question which ste it's an answer, okay. >> it's a great question which ste it's an a they're okay. >> it's a great question which ste it's an a they're especially >> it's um, they're especially vulnerable, haven't vulnerable, but i haven't figured why i do apologise. figured out why i do apologise. >> is it because they've got more light that smoke? is that the issue? >> that's the that's yeah. >> that's the that's the. yeah. they on they really get hooked on it because no, because they're scottish. no, it's is why you should it's um, this is why you should test things on animals. because we've just found out that scottish terriers are more

likely to be impacted by get cancer from passive smoking . cancer from passive smoking. >> is that i mean, it's sad you just said the same thing again. it's a it's a strange story. it doesn't merit any more of our time. let's move on to this one. this is the daily star time is ticking for humanity, steve. >> the doomsday clock . um, this >> the doomsday clock. um, this is when we find out how likely we are to reach armageddon. >> oh, can't come too soon. >>— >> oh, can't come too soon. >> it's not how clocks work. this is what bothers me. i know i'm a in many ways, but i'm a pedant in many ways, but we understand of we all understand the idea of things running out. bank accounts, being accounts, all things being closer get a ruler out. closer to it. get a ruler out. but they've decided refuse . but they've decided or refuse. you could still use seconds, but we'd have the idea of it. but the idea is this clock tells us how we are . it doesn't how close we are. it doesn't impact anything. you live impact anything. did you live your life differently in 1991, when it was 17 minutes away from the end of the world? no. or as it turned out, 17 minutes later, didn't happen . nick. didn't happen. nick. >> very quickly. your >> worse, very quickly. your thoughts on the. >> people talk it as >> well, people talk about it as if scientific. if it's something scientific. it's that was it's an art project that was started in, you know, in the

cold whatever, it cold war or whatever, and it was, all it it's an was, but it's all it is. it's an art project. mean, yes, there art project. i mean, yes, there is nuclear war, but is a risk of nuclear war, but not doomsday not because of the doomsday clock no. not because of the doomsday cloiso no. not worry about it, >> so let's not worry about it, okay? the is okay? well, look, the show is nearly over, so let's have another tuesday's another quick look at tuesday's front daily mail front pages. so the daily mail is leading starmer, wades is leading with starmer, wades into culture wars on the into the culture wars on the side woke. times has side of the woke. the times has got blood tests can detect early sign alzheimer's. got blood tests can detect early sign alzheimer's . the sign of alzheimer's. the guardian is running with medics urged to report illegal urged not to report illegal abortions to police. the metro has a fat busting balloon pill that you can get on the nhs , and that you can get on the nhs, and the i news has uk's worst storms in a decade will become the norm . scary stuff. and this frivolous piece of nonsense from the daily star about parrots that swear . those were your that swear. those were your front pages. that is all that we've got time for. thanks ever so much to my guests steve and alan and nick dixon . uh, and alan and nick dixon. uh, and steve is going to be back tomorrow leo tomorrow at 11:00 with leo kearse and josh howie. but if you're watching the 5 am. repeat right now, then please do stay tuned because it's time for

breakfast. like things are breakfast. looks like things are heating up. >> box spoilers, sponsors of weather on . gb news evening weather on. gb news evening storm jocelyn will be arriving at this time tomorrow. >> on tuesday evening . not as >> on tuesday evening. not as intense as storm isha , but intense as storm isha, but nevertheless could cause some further disruption brewing out in the atlantic at the moment . in the atlantic at the moment. there is the next storm system . there is the next storm system. storm isha continues to clear away. still plenty of isobars on the chart . it away. still plenty of isobars on the chart. it is still away. still plenty of isobars on the chart . it is still pretty the chart. it is still pretty gusty out there this evening. plenty of showers to packing in across scotland in particular, but will tend but the showers will tend to ease most places , ease off in most places, generally clear generally becoming clear overnight the will overnight and the winds will ease further until the ease down further until the cloud thickens and we start to see wet weather coming into northern ireland dawn, northern ireland by dawn, with the skies and as the the clearer skies and as the winds ease, we could see some pockets of frost across scotland. but for most us, scotland. but for most of us, we'll tuesday at 4 5 we'll start tuesday at 4 or 5 degrees. the will degrees. many in the east will start but the start dry and bright, but the rain will spread into the west and become much and then become pretty much

across by lunchtime. across all parts by lunchtime. the rain, though, over the heaviest rain, though, over western the rain could western hills the rain could cause some disruption because after storm isha, where we had quite a bit of falling, quite a bit of rain falling, extra rainfall may cause some flooding issues and then the winds continue to strengthen. actually a day actually quite a mild day tomorrow, feeling all tomorrow, but not feeling all that with wind and the that mild with the wind and the rain and the winds continue to strengthen tuesday strengthen during tuesday evening, the evening, particularly across the north. the won't be as north. the winds won't be as strong as with storm isha, but because storm isha is only just cleared, it could of course some structural so we do have structural issues. so we do have warnings in place abroad . yellow warnings in place abroad. yellow warnings in place abroad. yellow warning gusts of 55 to 65 miles an hour and the amber warning across northern and western scotland, where gusts could touch 80 miles an hour. >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar sponsors of weather on gb news as

gb news

away. >> good evening. it's me, camilla tominey with tonight's farage. do not adjust your set. i am obviously not nigel, who's a bit under the weather after his trip to iowa in —20 degrees. editions so i'm stepping in for him tonight and on tonight's show we're going to be discussing, of course, channel migrants would you believe that 16,000 people who have arrived here illegally by boat have been allowed to work, seemingly not quite the deterrent that the government planned for. we'll also, of course, be talking about storm isha floods and horrendous rain . one death of horrendous rain. one death of a man aged 84. when we're discussing whether climate change might be to blame . and as change might be to blame. and as ron desantis pulls out of the presidential race, we'll be joined by a pollster who's going to give us his update on what trump's chances are of winning back the white house. but first, here's the news with polly

middlehurst . thanks very much, middlehurst. thanks very much, camilla. well, good evening to you.the camilla. well, good evening to you. the top story from the gb newsroom tonight. new weather warnings have been issued with the new storm. josslyn heading for the uk just as the country recovers from storm isha . two recovers from storm isha. two people died and tens of thousands have been left without power after the uk was battered with high winds last night. gusts more than 100 miles an gusts of more than 100 miles an hour and heavy rain caused major travel disruption, with flooding and fallen trees. while planes were diverted and trains were cancelled . scotrail has cancelled. scotrail has announced it's again suspending services from 7:00 tomorrow as the new weather pattern approaches. there'll be no trains on wednesday, they say either lines are being checked for damage . downing street for damage. downing street denies the government's pursuing an anti—bbc agenda after announcing a raft of reforms as part of a review into the

corporation. under new plans ,