there was even talk of rehabilitation. really do you think you can rehabilitate someone who has done something as evil as this? mm. i'm not convinced. anyway, the guy also accused of the chemical attack in clapham is still on the run after two tailed asylum attempts and a conviction for sexual offences . he claimed asylum by

offences. he claimed asylum by saying he was now a christian. well if he's a christian, i am the queen of sheba. how on earth did our asylum system become such a joke ? and a dangerous one such a joke? and a dangerous one at that? and when the tories removed the cap from bankers bonuses, the labour party said it told us all we need to know about the tories. now, though, the labour party said they the labour party have said they will reintroduce cap . will not reintroduce that cap. is that right decision is that the right decision or not? get right, a study not? and get this right, a study has that rugby being has claimed that rugby being played schools is a form of played in schools is a form of child abuse. is it. played in schools is a form of child abuse. is it . well, i'm child abuse. is it. well, i'm going to get stuck into all of that and more with lord moylan and paul embery. but before we do , let's cross live for do, let's cross live for tonight's latest news headlines . tonight's latest news headlines. >> good evening. i'm sofia wenzel in the gb news room . two wenzel in the gb news room. two teenagers who killed brianna ghey. and what's been described as a sadistic attack have been

jailed for her murder. 16 year old scarlett jenkinson , who for old scarlett jenkinson, who for the first time admitted stabbing the first time admitted stabbing the transgender teen, will serve a minimum terms of 22 years. her accomplice, eddie ratcliffe, was given a minimum of 20 years, the court heard . after coaxing court heard. after coaxing brianna to a park , they stabbed brianna to a park, they stabbed her 28 times in a frenzied and ferocious attack with a hunting knife. in victim statements , knife. in victim statements, brianna's family described her killers as two predators stalking their prey and said they are pure evil . senior crown they are pure evil. senior crown prosecutor nicola wynn—williams says the nature of the crime was particularly shocking . particularly shocking. >> the sentencing hearing concludes one of the most disturbing cases that the cps has had to deal with. at just 16, scarlett jenkinson and eddie ratcliffe are convicted killers responsible for the brutal murder of a young girl who thought they were friends . the thought they were friends. the planning, violence and the age of the killers is beyond belief. the two appear to have had a deadly influence on each other, and turned what may have started

out as dark fantasies about murder into a reality . murder into a reality. >> a manhunt continues tonight for a suspected chemical attacker, with police saying they found significant and important new evidence. a new image has been released of abdul ezedi , who was last seen at ezedi, who was last seen at london's kings cross underground station on wednesday evening. police say the 31 year old mother, who was attacked, is still sedated in hospital, with life changing injuries. it comes after rishi sunak says foreign criminals should not be allowed to stay in the uk following the manhunt. met police commander john saville appealed for public help in tracing the suspect . help in tracing the suspect. >> if you've seen azadi or you know where he is, then i urge you please to contact our hotline , which . is hotline, which. is 020 7175 2784. or of course, you can phone crime stoppers if you think you've seen azadi. now do not approach him. ring 999 and

we will be there urgently . he we we will be there urgently. he we need the public's help to trace azadi . it's really important . azadi. it's really important. >> a student who ran over and killed her fiance after she lost her temper following an argument between them, has been sentenced to life in prison. alice wood will serve a minimum tum of 18 years for the murder of ryan watson. the 24 year old was found guilty of killing ryan, also 24, following a trial at chester crown court last month. he was hit by the ford fiesta. alice driving near their alice was driving near their home in cheshire, which she had claimed tragic accident . claimed was a tragic accident. a man has died after falling from the tate modern near the river thames in london. police air ambulance and paramedics attended the scene but despite the efforts, the man died at the scene. the gallery, which is one of the most visited art museums in the world, will remain closed following the incident. the death currently being treated

death is currently being treated as unexpected but it not as unexpected but it is not thought be suspicious and thought to be suspicious and there are fresh warnings of potential human rights breaches on the bibby stockholm barge as asylum seekers face what's being described as claustrophobic conditions . the home affairs conditions. the home affairs select committee says cramped living conditions are contributing to a decline in mental for health some residents, the cost of housing asylum claimants on the barge is £120 per person, per night . it £120 per person, per night. it comes as the home office has asked for an emergency £2.6 billion, after spending more than expected on asylum accommodation . last year, the accommodation. last year, the government spent around £8 million a day for migrant accommodation, with official figures showing more than 50,000 were housed in hotel rooms and charges against greta thunberg have been thrown out of court. the climate campaigner has appeared at westminster magistrates court for a public order offence after protesting in london last year. she was arrested during the demonstration near mayfair in october as oil executives met

for the energy intelligence forum . however, judge john law forum. however, judge john law said today that police tried to impose unlawful conditions dunng impose unlawful conditions during the protest . greta and during the protest. greta and four other activists pleaded not guilty in november to blocking the entrance to the meeting , and the entrance to the meeting, and the entrance to the meeting, and the government's offering a £1,000 sign on bonus for those to join the childcare sector . to join the childcare sector. it's part of a £65 million recruitment scheme and comes just two months before the first phase of a flagship childcare expansion. it follows the chancellor's announcement in march last year that eligible families of children as young as nine months will be able to claim 30 hours of free childcare a week . children and families a week. children and families minister david johnston told us the government is giving working families the support they need when children are between nought and five old. and five years old. >> a huge proportion of their brain development happens up to 80% of their brain development and that has a big role on what happens to them as children, young and then as adults. young people and then as adults. and so the biggest reason for people to look at this sector is

the huge difference can the huge difference they can make children at earliest make to children at the earliest stage seen over stage, we've already seen over 102,000 parent s claim this new offer, which is really strong demand and it shows that this is something that that people out there really want and that's going to make a huge difference to their family finances. >> and for the latest on all those stories, sign up to gb news alerts by scanning the qr code on your screen or go to gb news. com slash alerts. now it's back to . michelle. back to. michelle. >> thanks for that, sophia . i'm >> thanks for that, sophia. i'm michelle dewberry and i'm keeping you company till 7:00 tonight alongside me . what tonight alongside me. what a treat. look what i'm sandwiched in between everyone. the concert life peer in the house of lords and fresh from the hair salon. is that his hair? done just for us. ladies and gents, i speak of course, of lord moylan and trade unionist and writer , prince unionist and writer, prince harry lookalike and milk tray

wannabe man. look at him . you wannabe man. look at him. you look like the milk tray . look like the milk tray. >> you're showing your age now. i remember the milk tray adverts. the guy all dressed in black. yeah. oh, is that an age thing? yeah. i mean, he hasn't been on for about 20 years. been on tv for about 20 years. that's 1980s. that's a 1980s. >> me rephrase. i don't know >> let me rephrase. i don't know anything the milk tray, anything about the milk tray, man. time man. someone once upon a time wrote and told me that you wrote in and told me that you look like the milk tray man. very good looking lad. >> he was. >> he was. >> i didn't realise it was an age thing. i take it all back anyway. what a lucky lady i am to be sandwiched beneath would be where mrs. between. be beneath where mrs. between. between. let's pass the watershed this watershed yet. let's get this show track, everyone. show back on track, everyone. it's friday. can you tell? anyway, drill anyway, look, you know the drill on it is not just on this program. it is not just about austria and our sandwiches. very about sandwiches. it's very much about you home as well. what's you guys at home as well. what's on mind tonight? on your mind tonight? vaiews@gbnews.com how you vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get hold of me. or you tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get xold of me. or you tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get x me of me. or you tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get x me whatever you tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get x me whatever wer tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get x me whatever we call tweet vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get x me whatever we call itneet me x me whatever we call it these days at gb news. andy says michelle dewberry have an open tonight. if so , can you have tonight. if so, can you have a double on me? he says he'll pay for it and everything. uh, he

says i spoke common sense last night. i got to say i was quite angry last night. you'll be pleased to know i've calmed down a little bit. uh, tonight there are some serious, uh, topics i want with you this want to get into with you this evening. familiar with evening. you'll be familiar with some of them. sure. uh, some of them. i am sure. uh, because brianna ghey her because today, brianna ghey her killers now been publicly killers have now been publicly named sentenced . uh, named and sentenced. uh, scarlett jenkinson . she was one scarlett jenkinson. she was one of them. she received a minimum 22 year sentence. uh, eddie ratcliffe, he was the other one. he got a minimum 20 year sentence . and there is a lot sentence. and there is a lot i want to unpick in this story today, ladies and gents, because i want to ask you all at home and on the panel a few different things. uh, do you think actually these two people should have the have been named? that's the first are first question. they are teenagers after all. do you back that decision also as well? how on earth young people kids, on earth do young people kids, become of doing become capable of doing something they born something so evil? are they born that way? is this something that's, nurtured them that's, uh, nurtured into them or what? uh, daniel, your thoughts? >> i've long held the view that everybody appears in court everybody who appears in court on a criminal in a on a

on a criminal or in a on a criminal charge should be named. we should have a system of open pubuc we should have a system of open public justice in this country. even kids . at what stage? and even kids. at what stage? and they should be named certainly at the point. that's that's a question you could have two views on. but certainly at the point at which they're charged and, and, and move into that sphere where they're going be sphere where they're going to be appearing court and i think appearing in court and i think we should know this, this whole idea secret justice, secret idea of secret justice, secret courts not giving names. courts not giving out names. it's antithetical to our system. and people, you know, they have a right to vindicate their a right also to vindicate their names. can be accused of names. you can be accused of something be found not something and be found not guilty it. and that in itself guilty of it. and that in itself isn't matter of shame. that is isn't a matter of shame. that is a matter of you demonstrating that you're not guilty of something court failing, something or the court failing, at the prosecution failing at least the prosecution failing to demonstrate of to demonstrate your guilty of something. also entitled something. you're also entitled to your name through publicising. >> yeah, well, people will think often. no without often. there's no smoke without fire. so people think that fire. so people can think that people think that. people can think that. >> but that isn't what the system is saying. think system is saying. and i think people, this whole people, you know, this whole idea that we have less and less

knowledge about what's happening in we've in the courts, which we've always on a system of always operated on a system of pubuc always operated on a system of public open justice, is a very, very bad one. and we should be moving right away from that. i congrats plate the judge on deciding these two deciding to name these two people. very possible people. it's very, very possible she have decided not to she might have decided not to allow that. >> where are you on that one, paul? >> i think only in exceptional circumstances. i think if a case like this, where it is of such magnitude and the case was so horrific , i think it probably is horrific, i think it probably is in the public interest to say, yes, we should name the individuals involved regardless of their age, but i don't agree with daniel that that should be, you know, the default position. um, i think actually the kids , um, i think actually the kids, if they go to, you know , if if they go to, you know, if you're up on a shoplifting charge as an 11 year old, all right, it probably wouldn't happen. in reality, we know that . but if you're if you're up for a low level sort of crime and, you know, you before the beacon, your 13, that's the sort your 11, 12, 13, that's the sort of thing that could potentially stay with you for life. >> because be a spent

conviction. >> no. but the but the knowledge would is the spending spent would is the spending the spent conviction. public know. conviction. the public know. that's the point i'm making. that's not the point i'm making. daniel allowed what daniel be allowed to refer what i'm talking what i'm about, what i'm talking what i'm about, what i'm talking what i'm is stigma . i'm talking about is the stigma. i'm talking about is the stigma. i'm talking about is the stigma. i'm talking the publicity i'm talking about the publicity that at the time when you that occurs at the time when you find going for a job in find yourself going for a job in 1015, 20 years wouldn't be 1015, 20 years time wouldn't be allowed mention. and it's allowed to mention. and it's still that. still no. sure, i accept that. but the is, it's still out but the point is, it's still out there in big, wide, wide there in the big, wide, wide world. there on world. it's still there on the internet. people still know about it. they still refer about it. they can still refer to people will know about it to it. people will know about it within look, within your community. so look, i i agree with you that i brought i agree with you that by large we should by and large we should absolutely name suspects people who have been charged in in court and people who have been convicted. but i think with kids it probably should be a different of rules. and different set of rules. and i think only in exceptional circumstances is it justified. and is an and i think this is an exceptional circumstance. i completely idea that completely support the idea that these were named by these two were named by brianna's these two were named by briium, s originally not not in >> um, was originally not not in favour of them being named. i don't think. then he said that he was in favour of them being named, and then said

named, and then he then said today that actually, on reflection , ian, wishes that reflection, ian, he wishes that they been named they hadn't been named because especially . i mean, especially this girl. i mean, i've got to say, the pair of these are absolute these teenagers are absolute wrong there's obviously um, wrong and there's obviously um, but when at the but when you look at the teenager, she was absolutely fascinated the most fascinated by the most horrendous, uh, sadistic , you horrendous, uh, sadistic, you know, serial killers , torture, know, serial killers, torture, all this awful kind of stuff . all this awful kind of stuff. well, now she has got notoriety. well, now she has got notoriety. we all know her name now, so there is a small part of me, daniel, that worries by naming her because it's not changed anything. she's going to be behind bars now for a number of years. that's all done. but by us now, knowing her name, i worry whether or not she's going to become like some kind of, um, a of adoration to a bunch a figure of adoration to a bunch of weirdos out in society that are into that kind of thing. >> yeah, there might be some element that. you can't deny element of that. you can't deny that. is, you that. but the fact is, you either have a system in which people know happening in people know what's happening in the courts, and they can see it happening, have one which the courts, and they can see it héeffectively have one which the courts, and they can see it héeffectively secret1ave one which the courts, and they can see it he effectively secret justice.e which is effectively secret justice. when start on that path , you when you start on that path, you have other opportunities

when you start on that path, you havclosing other opportunities when you start on that path, you havclosing things opportunities when you start on that path, you havclosing things down. tunities when you start on that path, you havclosing things down. people for closing things down. people who mentioned . and you who are not mentioned. and you go ahead in the civil courts, you get super injunctions now. well, don't know who's well, you don't know who's behind them. who are know, behind them. who are you know, who who's stopping the who is it? who's stopping the newspapers printing this stuff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't rs printing this stuff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't even nting this stuff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't even knowthis stuff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't even know who ;tuff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't even know who it|ff? who is it? who's stopping the new don't even know who it is. you don't even know who it is. true. all of this, you know, this spread secrecy through this spread of secrecy through the is it seems to the courts, um, is it seems to me very dangerous for me, is very, very dangerous for trust in the in the in the justice system. and it's bad policy . kc. so you say you start policy. kc. so you say you start with kids and you end up with, with kids and you end up with, with russian billionaires . you with russian billionaires. you know, is the you know, know, what is the you know, what's where does this stop? >> think the is as well, >> i think the thing is as well, i think that this did i don't think that this girl did it notoriety. if you listen it for notoriety. if you listen to evidence and judge , to the evidence and the judge, the judge's summing up, i think she committed that crime and she she committed that crime and it was horrendous. i was listening to on the radio, on listening to it on the radio, on the way down, and the details were horrendous. think she were horrendous. and i think she did it for personal gratification . reason. um, i gratification. reason. um, i think she clearly had a very dark interest in, in death and killing and torture. um, and

decided to, to carry that out. there are some people who kill for notoriety . probably the most for notoriety. probably the most famous example mark chapman, who assassin did john lennon? um but actually, i don't think that was the case here. i don't think she probably cares whether or not she she gets no society. i think she she gets no society. i think she did it for other reasons. i think the evidence suggests she did it for other reasons. >> um, what about this >> um, and what about this whole, um, kind of situation now whereby , you know, it almost whereby, you know, it almost becomes , um, something to feast becomes, um, something to feast upon.so becomes, um, something to feast upon. so these kind of cases, i remember it with lucy letby as well. you've got newspapers and stuff going, you know, download our we're going to our podcasts. we're going to explore all the twists and all the turns. and it's kind of like you're almost kind of glamorising this thing as though it's like a fiction based crime. >> there's nothing new in that. the newspapers in the 19th century, you know , going back century, you know, going back 150 years, were much more lurid about murder cases than you would be allowed to have on a

podcast today . they were podcast today. they were absolutely not not the top line broadsheets, but the newspapers . broadsheets, but the newspapers. you know, they were absolutely fascinated by this sort of thing. of course, they could report stuff from court . there report stuff from court. there were no secrets , and they were no secrets, and they feasted on it. then people get over it. >> what about this nature versus nurture situation ? because i do nurture situation? because i do confess that when i heard about these two teenagers, one of my first questions internally, i was like, right, well, what's gone on in their life, in their family that's made them this way . but actually, by all accounts, these both of these teenagers, they've got, you know , decent they've got, you know, decent upbringings, loving families, apparently, you know, relatively middle class upbringings . they middle class upbringings. they seem to be quite dare i say, normal in their upbringing. >> so what? it's so complicated , >> so what? it's so complicated, isn't it? and i think you'd need to be a psychiatrist to get to the bottom of it. i think some people probably are born evil . people probably are born evil. um, i think that's probably true. a very small number of people are innately evil, and i think there's probably not much

society or medical professionals can do to alter that. i think some people probably become evil , maybe because of their background , maybe because of background, maybe because of experiences in their own life. maybe they've suffered a particular trauma or they get radicalised or they're radicalised. yeah, that's a good example. people people can become evil from from not being evil. and i just i think it's true that society will always have sadists. society will always have people who seek to harm others and carry out the most heinous crimes for reasons of personal gratify nation. i don't know if that will ever change. what about you? >> nature nurture? well i mean, you have to be a theologian as much a psychiatrist. much as a psychiatrist. >> the fact is, we're all born. born with a capacity for wrongdoing evil . and we wrongdoing and for evil. and we oh, we certainly have that capacity and that potentiality. yes. and yes, i agree. and yeah, i do what, what what prevents us from doing that is the fact

there were also born unlike the animal kingdom were born with we're born with intellect and will and they need to be shaped by some sort of moral framework. i think war is guides us away, guides us away from, from indulging , you know, going down indulging, you know, going down the street and punching people we don't like. >> i think war i think war is a good example of that. i think when you throw mainly young men into a brutal war, into the front line , into combat with front line, into combat with somebody who you present as an enemy, then what people become capable of in those circumstances , especially if circumstances, especially if they've been fighting a war for a year or two years or something in really difficult conditions . in really difficult conditions. orphans, um, they suddenly find that they can. and we see it. we see, you know, people commit war crimes who are otherwise on civvy street, just decent and reasonable people. and that's an example, i think, of where actually you can, can. the other point is the second, second part of that is that we can be restrained from doing that

through having a proper moral education, which teaches us not to do things that bad to to do things that are bad to other people. >> a lot of what parents do, >> and a lot of what parents do, of course, goes into that . a lot of course, goes into that. a lot of course, goes into that. a lot of what schools do goes into that, moral and that, into the moral and behavioural education of children. and that's really crucially important. but there are cases where it doesn't work. >> i'm not a psychiatrist, i do grant you that, but i just completely disagree with both of you. don't think that as, um, you. i don't think that as, um, default every individual human being has it within them to be evil . i think being has it within them to be evil. i think this whole notion of, you know, stabbing people repeatedly in the head are just i don't think no, i don't think most people. >> would you go back to the gas chambers, you go back to hannah arendt and the banality of evil. evil ceases to horrendous to evil ceases to be horrendous to the people who are practising it. it becomes a norm. it becomes banal, and that's how they justify it to them. through they justify it to them. through the moral, through the moral net, if you like. >> what do you think seems to be okay? what do you think to be at home? david's been in touch.

you've an interesting you've told me an interesting story. says he watched story. um, he says he watched when two and half year old when his two and a half year old grandson encouraged their dog when his two and a half year old granthe1 encouraged their dog when his two and a half year old granthe lounge raged their dog when his two and a half year old granthe lounge andd their dog when his two and a half year old granthe lounge and closed dog when his two and a half year old granthe lounge and closed the into the lounge and closed the doon into the lounge and closed the door. david said he was concerned was going concerned about what was going on. peeped inside. the and on. peeped inside. the two and a half old had altered the half year old had altered the dog and was stabbing him with a biro . he says he flagged it to biro. he says he flagged it to his daughter. obviously the kid's mom and the kid's mom said, oh, it's just terrible twos and didn't think there was anything that, he anything wrong with that, he says. anyway fast forward to the here he's just been here and now. he's just been sentenced knife at here and now. he's just been sen'agead knife at here and now. he's just been sen'age of knife at here and now. he's just been sen'age of 20, knife at here and now. he's just been sen'age of 20, aftere at here and now. he's just been sen'age of 20, after being at here and now. he's just been sen'age of 20, after being ont the age of 20, after being on tag for a couple of years. he's got no job, no prospects, he says.i got no job, no prospects, he says. i despise kc. >> i do think happened to >> i do think what happened to the dog. >> yeah. there you go, david. what happened to the dog? what happened don't happened to the dog? i don't know, don't tell the know, david. don't tell me the end that but i do find end of that story. but i do find that quite interesting because i would it's not quite normal would say it's not quite normal for year olds to for two and a half year olds to be stabbing dogs with biros. and, like you, david, i think i would been a little bit would have been a little bit alert to something and concerned. anyway, we need alert to something and contended. anyway, we need alert to something and contend of anyway, we need alert to something and contend of that vay, we need alert to something and contend of that story.e need alert to something and contend of that story. what|eed the end of that story. what happened after the

happened to the dog after the break? i'm also wanting to talk to you about guy that's on to you about the guy that's on the still suspected the run, still suspected of being chemical being this chemical attacker. i want why on earth was he want to know why on earth was he allowed to even be in this country in the place after country in the first place after being convicted sexual being convicted of sexual offences? yeah, i know, offences? oh yeah, i know, because apparently he's a christian. i mean, come christian. really? i mean, come on i'll you in two.

>> the other there might be circumstances where that's true. >> earlier on, gb news radio . >> earlier on, gb news radio. >> earlier on, gb news radio. >> hi there. >> hi there. >> i'm michelle dewberry. this is dewbs & co right through till is dewbs& co right through till seven. the tory life peer in the house of lords, daniel moylan, alongside me, as is the trade unionist and the writer paul embery. nina has just been in touch and as a family who touch and said, as a family who were victims of horrendous were victims of a horrendous crime , she says to this day crime, she says to this day i will be forever grateful that the thing that's what she calls him, who perpetrates the crime against us was not named as we would have been forever damaged as had his name ever become . as had his name ever become. pubuc as had his name ever become. public knowledge. you see, i think is an interesting

think that is an interesting point. how much should the victims say in whether or victims have a say in whether or not perpetrators known not those perpetrators are known 7 not those perpetrators are known ? named? do you think the victims should have a say in that? >> i think the views of victims should be listened to and survivors, should be survivors, but should be listened to. i think the public policy issues because this policy issues here, because this is is bigger than any is this is bigger than any particular crime. individual crime of crime or any particular set of victims or family members. >> yeah, lots of people. it won't surprise to say won't surprise you, um, to say that actually, like the that actually, things like the death come death penalty should come into conversation it comes to conversation when it comes to crimes like the horrendous murder of brianna. uh, gee , lots murder of brianna. uh, gee, lots of people. >> absolutely no way that we would execute somebody under the age of at the age of 16, even if you had death penalty. no. you had the death penalty. no. even we had it. so this is even when we had it. so this is wholly irrelevant to this. even when we had it. so this is wh(yeah,'elevant to this. even when we had it. so this is wh(yeah, neither. to this. even when we had it. so this is wh(yeah, neither. neither should >> yeah, neither. neither should we 16 year olds. we execute 16 year olds. >> about when they turn 18? >> what about when they turn 18? >> what about when they turn 18? >> no, because you'd then be levying a particular punishment for a crime that they didn't commit at 18 and weren't of the, you know, adult age to be executed in that hypothetical scenario . you'd be punishing

scenario. you'd be punishing them for something they did when they were still a child. so i don't really get that. >> if you're in favour of the death penalty from the age of 18, don't really understand 18, i don't really understand why. if someone 17.5. so why. if someone is 17.5. so there's few or a extra weeks there's few or a few extra weeks would difference in would make all the difference in your there has be. your mind. well there has to be. >> you have to. there has to be a cut doesn't there? it's a cut off, doesn't there? it's like saying, at what does like saying, at what age does somebody become criminally responsible? always responsible? there are always there's any cut off. there's always any cut off. there's always a cut off point. and just before an arbitrary number, before it's people number, just before it's people will yeah, but hold on. will go, yeah, but hold on. we're only a few weeks we're we're only a few weeks away from it. there's way away from it. there's no way around that. >> can the final say >> you can have the final say on that. i've got good that. anyway, i've got some good news. he was asking about the dog. oh, the dog in the dog. oh, yes. the dog in the barrow about two and barrow attack. about two and a half year old. david says the dog lived a full and happy life with lasting with no apparent lasting effects. very pleased with no apparent lasting ef1hear very pleased with no apparent lasting ef1hear that very pleased with no apparent lasting ef1hear that the very pleased with no apparent lasting ef1hear that the dogy pleased with no apparent lasting ef1hear that the dogy pletood to hear that the dog was too loving even to hold a grudge. yeah, well, there you are. well, there we do like a happy there you go. we do like a happy ending. got to say, ending. uh, i've got to say, especially there not especially when there is not much to positive about in the

much to be positive about in the news agenda. got to be honest. uh, the story followed news agenda. got to be honest. uh from the story followed news agenda. got to be honest. uh from yesterday. tory followed news agenda. got to be honest. uhfrom yesterday. that:ollowed news agenda. got to be honest. uhfrom yesterday. that abdul d on from yesterday. that abdul ezedi fella, uh, he is the one, of course, accused of that horrendous chemical attack. it wasn't just a chemical attack. i have to say. you, sir, went on to hit the woman. the mum of the child of the children with a car. i do have to say that that 31 year old victim, she is still in hospital. she is sedated and it's now been confirmed that she has life changing injuries. i mean, er , this is the mean, er, this is the perpetrator or the alleged, um, perpetrator or the alleged, um, perpetrator that is on our screens . he is still at large. screens. he is still at large. this is who the police are searching for. i have to tell you some details about this fella. he came over to the uk on a lorry in 2016. he had not one, but two asylum claims . a lorry in 2016. he had not one, but two asylum claims. uh, turned down. he then , uh, was turned down. he then, uh, was convicted on a couple of sex offences and then apparently because he apparently get this

everybody, uh, he converted to christianity. he became a christian. some priest then vouched for him, and then he had his asylum. granted, i mean, i got to say, daniel. right? i think this just makes a mockery of our asylum system. i think there are so many people now that know how to play this system. and, you know, you could have, uh, converted whatever have, uh, converted to whatever you your own mind, you wanted in your own mind, quite but even the very quite frankly. but even the very fact you've been fact that you've just been convicted of a crime that on its own should have been merit to be out and deported, well , own should have been merit to be out and deported, well, i own should have been merit to be out and deported, well , i rather agree. >> and the fact is that we now, um, allow about 68, i think it is of asylum claims that are made. yeah. whereas 20 years ago we would have been allowing under 20% of asylum claims and the rest would have been rejected. um is that because of laziness? is that because we're desperately trying to clear a backlog , which should never be backlog, which should never be a driver of public policy on this? whatever the labour party says,

um, or is it because, um , uh, or um, or is it because, um, uh, or is it because the system has been developed through, through legal extensions to a point where it's almost impossible to say no, no , no? the fact is, say no, no, no? the fact is, many muslim asylum seekers know that back in their own country, not every muslim country , but in not every muslim country, but in many countries , apostasy many muslim countries, apostasy to another religion like christianity an extremely christianity is an extremely serious offence, and in some countries it would get you stoned to death. uh, pretty quickly. so you can say, well, i'm you have i'm a christian now. you have too pastors . i i'm a christian now. you have too pastors. i don't i'm a christian now. you have too pastors . i don't know too many pastors. i don't know which particular branch or denomination christianity denomination of christianity this was converted to, this person was converted to, but pastors who are but too many pastors who are willing to accept these things at face value. and it is, and this is clear, there ought to be some better institutional structures for it, because it is fundamentally a safeguarding issue. if you just accept anybody who says to be anybody who says they want to be anybody who says they want to be a christian, even though, you know, just because your know, just because that's your attitude, then it releases danger on the streets. so that's what happened. but then you go back further and you say, back a bit further and you say, well, he was convicted

well, after he was convicted of the sex offence, he have the sex offence, should he have been deported at that point? and the i'd have thought the answer is, i'd have thought pretty yes , but pretty obviously yes, but he wasn't. don't know wasn't. why not? we don't know the at the moment . the circumstances at the moment. of we don't know that of course, we don't know that he's committed offence. i he's committed any offence. i just say he he just want to say that he is he is being looked for by the police. we don't know that police. but we don't know that he's actually done anything wrong. that has to be wrong. mm. um that has to be proven yet, paul. the suspect wrong. mm. um that has to be proven neveraul. the suspect wrong. mm. um that has to be proven never have'he suspect wrong. mm. um that has to be proven never have been spect wrong. mm. um that has to be proven never have been in ect wrong. mm. um that has to be proven never have been in the country. >> but the surprise, michel, is that anyone is actually surprised by this. why why are people surprised by our people surprised by this? our asylum system been asylum system has been a shambles . well, i think, you shambles. well, i think, you know, there's a lot of outcry. how did this happen? why did this shock. i this happen? what a shock. i don't people are don't think people are surprised, second surprised, actually, the second that police didn't tell that the met police didn't tell us description that us the description of that person think almost person yesterday, i think almost immediately then knew immediately people then knew they joined dots and then they know, okay, there's a reason why you're asking the public to look out for content and doorbell footage, but you're not telling us what it is that we're looking out for other than a guy. and let's not forget, a similar thing happened. when was it? 2

or 3 years ago at liverpool women's where women's hospital? yeah. where someone scenario someone very similar scenario was refused asylum from the middle think syria, it middle east. i think syria, it may converted in may have been converted in inverted commas to christianity . inverted commas to christianity. the church waved it through, said yes, this man's a committed christian. a few weeks before he carried out the attack, reconverted back to islam and he should never have been in the country. and everybody said at the time, you know, we need to learn lessons. need to make learn lessons. we need to make sure this doesn't happen again. the that they say the same thing that they say every whether it's every single time, whether it's the manchester or the manchester bombing or whatever, look at how whatever, we need to look at how we stop this thing we can stop this thing happening. need at happening. we need to look at how tighten up, tighten how we can tighten up, tighten up our immigration and asylum laws. you know, are laws. you know, people are getting through clearly getting through who clearly shouldn't they're shouldn't be here for they're having their asylum claims approved shouldn't , approved when they shouldn't, and does anything about and nobody does anything about it. year after year after year. politicians and i have to say, daniel, your party has got to take responsibility for this. certainly over the last 13 years or whatever it is promising time

and time again , we understand and time again, we understand the public concern on this. we understand people want us understand that people want us to this. will to address this. yes, we will address it, but year after year after year, not only do they not address it, but actually the problem gets worse and we hear more these types of stories more of these types of stories about people. what do you say about people. so what do you say having claims approved having asylum claims approved when shouldn't have. and we when they shouldn't have. and we see the numbers go up time and time again. what's response time again. what's your response to daniel? to that then, daniel? >> lot of people, what >> because a lot of people, what i think happened, of course, i think has happened, of course, the party has the conservative party has formed since 2015 formed the government since 2015 and in coalition since 2010. and was in coalition since 2010. >> so course it has a share >> so of course it has a share of responsibility for anything that in government that goes wrong in government dunng that goes wrong in government duri going to say that. but at i'm going to say that. but at the same time, if you look at the same time, if you look at the underlying cause of it, it is fundamentally the legalisation like, legalisation of if you like, the, the making all of this the, the, the making all of this subject to constant judicial review and the extension of law by, by judges in particular cases. by, by judges in particular cases . and if the government can cases. and if the government can have a bill which says that rwanda is safe and make that a legal something that the courts

have to accept as a legal fact and they can if they can get this act of parliament, this bill through, then they could equally do something which limited the grounds on which people can appeal . and the basis people can appeal. and the basis on which appeals can be granted in the courts. and that's the course of action they need to take. but it but they've been frightened out of it constantly by the by the whole woke um left wing establishment. well it seems to me like there is some kind of racket because if it's not sitting there saying, well, i've converted to christianity, if that card fails , well, the if that card fails, well, the one you pull next one that you pull out next surely is. >> oh well, i'm gay. i'm gay now, so i can't sent back. now, so i can't be sent back. and problem that you've got and the problem that you've got is you prove or disprove is how do you prove or disprove either those two scenarios? either of those two scenarios? what the answer to that? um. what is the answer to that? um. meanwhile by the way, everyone's outraged about this particular case. meanwhile up pops james cleverly. i mean, i'm not laughing because i think this is funny. i'm laughing because the absolute absurdity of it, ladies and gents, he's now popped up

asking for an extra £26 billion to help with hotel costs, etc. for putting these people up in hotels as well. >> do you want them sleeping on the streets as well? i mean, the fact that james james cleverly is a sensible , intelligent man. is a sensible, intelligent man. i've known a long time and i've known a very long time and i've known a very long time and i he realises a lot of i think he realises a lot of this is very unsustainable. we need see action from james. need to see action from james. but james the sort of home but james is the sort of home secretary who might deliver secretary who might just deliver on action. but in the on some action. but in the meantime, yes, whole meantime, yes, the whole thing is costing fortune . we is costing us a fortune. we still a way of stopping the still need a way of stopping the boats, is really where boats, which is really where these costs daniel. these costs are coming from stopping the boats. but i'm astonished that your first answer to that is when i raise a concern that i'm telling know telling you now, you'll know anyway, huge concern for people. >> the amount of money that we're spending putting these people hotels, first people up in hotels, your first response what response to that is, well, what do want to sleep on do you want them to do? sleep on the well, i find that the streets? well, i find that quite an interesting response because be because most people will be screaming at um, screens screaming at their, um, screens saying, quite frankly, i saying, well, quite frankly, i don't they but don't care where they sleep, but it shouldn't in the likes of

it shouldn't be in the likes of four star hotels. it's an insult to single them being moved to every single them being moved out this country. out to this country. >> they're being out of >> they're being moved out of four hotels. but the fact four star hotels. but the fact is, be more. i'd be is, people will be more. i'd be more had more frightened if you had doorways people. doorways filled with people. i mean, i meant by mean, that's what i meant by that. not i'm sorry for them. >> and actually and actually, let's be let's be honest, i'm sorry for people who to let's be let's be honest, i'm sorry people people who to let's be let's be honest, i'm sorry people humanely. o to let's be let's be honest, i'm sorry people humanely. you to let's be let's be honest, i'm sorry people humanely. you know, treat people humanely. you know, whether or not the people should be here, whether or not they've come we are come illegally. you know, we are a country. and a civilised country. and if there people here we there are people here and we have capacity to be able to have the capacity to be able to put them hotels or wherever put them in hotels or wherever it give them, you it is in order to give them, you know, warm, sanitary know, decent, warm, sanitary accommodation, we should do accommodation, then we should do so. can have the separate so. we can have the separate debate . we can the separate debate. we can have the separate debate, michel, about whether they should be and we can they should be here, and we can have separate debate about have the separate debate about the collapse asylum the collapse of the asylum system of them are system and how some of them are gaming system. absolutely. gaming the system. absolutely. but can't do is treat but what we can't do is treat them inhumanely and say, actually go, go, go and sleep in the woods or go. >> and what about creating a building, some form of refugee accommodation ? people manage to accommodation? people manage to knock the nightingale

knock up the nightingale facilities. overnight , but facilities. not overnight, but not far off. what about knocking up some kind of safe , clean, uh, up some kind of safe, clean, uh, refugee accommodation? fine. >> as long as it's warm and as long as it's safe. i think we. i think we have. i think we have a duty to make sure that people are warm and safe. and then we have the separate debate about us, of course, but there's a distraction. the whole cost thing is distraction. you thing is a distraction. you know, we need to deal with the asylum but we get asylum system. but if we get sidetracked a debate about sidetracked into a debate about the money i think the money involved, i think we're big we're losing sight of the big point. pretty big distraction. >> i would say £8 million a day, an extra £26 billion requested. i'd to know the answer to i'd love to know the answer to that rather than sitting there and what do you and saying, well, what do you want to do? sleep on the want me to do? sleep on the streets? not sir. give us streets? course not sir. give us your cash for hotels. why your cash for more hotels. why isn't a conversation being your cash for more hotels. why isn'twithin a conversation being your cash for more hotels. why isn'twithin government,n being your cash for more hotels. why isn'twithin government, within] had within government, within the domain, about the public domain, about building safe, decent , warm building safe, um, decent, warm refugee accommodation in the way that , for example, a nightingale that, for example, a nightingale hotel, not hotel hospitals were knocked up very quickly. what

about that? is that the solution to this? you get in touch and give me your thoughts on that. i'm sure you'll have something to after the break, i to say. uh, after the break, i want talk you about want to talk to you about bankers. do you think there should be a cap what they should be a cap on what they could earn? do remember could earn? do you remember labour for labour attacked tory for removing well, anyway, removing said cap? well, anyway, they they're not going to be they say they're not going to be putting that cap back is putting that cap back on, is that the right decision? you that the right decision? see you in two.

one of the lowest ranked freedom of press in the world. earlier on gb news radio show. >> hello there . i'm michelle >> hello there. i'm michelle dewberry and i'm with you till 7:00 tonight. lots of conversation about what you would actually do in terms of the accommodation for these asylum seekers . i ask, of asylum seekers. i ask, of course, because james cleverly has asked for billions more pounds to help with hotel bills for these people, which i think i've got to say, i think is pretty damn scandalous. really not least because in this country you've got, um, people at british citizens living in

shipping containers . do you shipping containers. do you remember that story? not that long ago. pretty disgraceful. uh, anyway, anne there uh, anyway, anne says there needs be temporary shelters needs to be temporary shelters built. time the built. it's about time the government started to provide these kinds of facilities . one these kinds of facilities. one of my other viewers says you could put up marquees right outside downing street and house people. uh see how much our leaders like it? well, actually, you could put the marquees at the end of the streets of everyone that thinks that refugees are welcome and absolutely supports up and borders. uh, maybe that would be absolutely supports up and b

this, daniel? >> that, i think she's worked this, daniel? >> that actually she's worked this, daniel? >> that actually the s worked this, daniel? >> that actually the government out that actually the government can 40 45% of all those can take 40 to 45% of all those bonuses they're bonuses and they're happy, rather the treasury. rather welcome in the treasury. i the government i don't think the government should setting, um, uh, should be setting, um, uh, maximum or minimum earnings might thing, but setting might be one thing, but setting maximum in the private maximum earnings in the private sector . now, it's true that some sector. now, it's true that some of banks are not entirely of these banks are not entirely in the private sector. and the government a say as owner, government has a say as owner, and that's do's. if you own and that's fair do's. if you own the bank, you have you're entitled in how it's entitled to a say in how it's run. i fully accept that. but but the private sector, the but in the private sector, the government setting but in the private sector, the goverthe ant setting but in the private sector, the goverthe wages setting but in the private sector, the goverthe wages and setting but in the private sector, the goverthe wages and the setting but in the private sector, the goverthe wages and the income| what the wages and the income are . are. >> do you agree with that, paul? >> do you agree with that, paul? >> no, completely wrong. >> no, it's completely wrong. removing it will just simply encourage good encourage that. greed is good culture. has been removed. >> it's about whether or not they're going to no, no. >> exactly. yeah. and i think the removal will encourage the removal of it will encourage the removal of it will encourage the greed good culture. the greed is good culture. and at during the cost of at a time during the cost of living crisis , when the rest of living crisis, when the rest of the being told to the country is being told to tighten when tighten its belts, when the pubuc tighten its belts, when the public sector being told you public sector is being told you can't a decent pay increase can't have a decent pay increase when struggling to when people are struggling to make when ordinary make ends meet, when ordinary workers are suffering the tightest since tightest grip on wages since napoleonic times, how can it be

right that the government says to bankers , bearing in mind that to bankers, bearing in mind that these are very people who these are the very people who crashed economy in 2008 and crashed the economy in 2008 and has put and have put us, they certainly played their part, daniel, and have in the daniel, and have put us in the kind predicament that we've kind of predicament that we've beenin kind of predicament that we've been in for the last 16 years, actually. we'll let everything let again in the city and let rip again in the city and we'll earn as much as we'll let people earn as much as they it will they like. it will it will encourage recklessness. that's that's a key thing. of that's a key thing. one of the reasons was since it reasons has it it was since it was lifted. well, well have we seen let's see. >> remember, what we're discussing here is not lifting. let's see what we're discussing is think not reinstating. >> i it's early to say >> i think it's too early to say whether or not it's going to encourage recklessness. but i certainly think there is that danger people think, you danger where people think, you know, massive know, if they can earn massive bonuses a few more bonuses by taking a few more risks, will it. and risks, then they will do it. and some of these bonuses you can get times salary as a get two times your salary as a banken get two times your salary as a banker. the cap was for two times the salary . even then, times the salary. even then, that was still for some of the top executives. still half £1 million in bonuses. i don't think that's particularly unreasonable , daniel. and as

unreasonable, daniel. and as i say at a time where people in the real economy, the productive sector and people in the finance and economy , well, no, it's not and economy, well, no, it's not really, is it? it's not the productive sector. it's people. it's people by and large, kind of play in casinos and widgets and selling stocks and shares and selling stocks and shares and gambling in over each other. >> secondly, let me just bring some facts in the financial and professional services industry employs 2.5 million people across the uk. that's 1.1 across the uk. that's1.1 million services, million in financial services, 1.3 related 1.3 million in related professional services. the industry produced £278 billion of economic output, which is 12% of economic output, which is 12% of the entire uk's economic output and £100 billion in tax revenue. so it is a real sector, but it's not. >> it's not what we would understand. the real economy to be, which is the productive sector where goods are produced and is produced. and, and wealth is produced. and, and, know , where we a and, you know, where we have a service based economy where people well, this is the problem . so obsessed with . we are so obsessed with financial services. think financial services. and i think that obsession financial

that obsession with financial services been massively to services has been massively to the the of the, of the detriment of the of the, of our industrial base . our industrial base. manufacturing in this country has been decimated. we don't make anything anymore . some of make anything anymore. some of our towns in the north and the midlands now post industrial towns which once upon a time thrived on manufacturing . but thrived on manufacturing. but because we've we've essentially recalibrated our economy into financial services and away from that , i think financial services and away from that, i think we've paid a huge price as a society for it. >> we haven't sent industrial jobs into the city of london. they have gone to china, they have gone to places like that. >> on, is a totally >> but come on, is a totally separate economic policy, is geared towards at providing geared towards good at providing services, of services, certain types of services, certain types of services, not just finance, accountancy, all sorts other accountancy, all sorts of other things there. things are in there. >> we're good doing and >> we're good at doing it and would for world. and would do it for the world. and we money out of it. who we make money out of it. who does it benefit? >> doesn't benefit most people in well i suppose in this country. well i suppose a lot their taxes, as much as a lot of their taxes, as much as you on the nhs, £100 you spend on the nhs, £100 billion in tax revenue . billion in tax revenue. >> um, that's some stats that came out in terms of that economic contribution. but where do stand on that debate

do you stand on that debate coming up after the break? the bar is open. yes. thank god i've been waiting for that since 6:00. quite frankly . anyway, i 6:00. quite frankly. anyway, i want to ask you i'll bring in some of your comments on those previous i also want previous topics. but i also want to as well, rugby, if to ask you as well, rugby, if kids playing rugby at kids are playing rugby at school, you that school, do you think that is a form of child abuse? should it be banned? your thoughts you want

to. hi there michelle dewberry with you until 7:00 tonight. lord moylan remains alongside me, as does paul embery. jubilee tavern is irpen. cheers everyone . my is irpen. cheers everyone. my weekend officially starts. >> michel. >> michel. >> cheers. um, eddie has been in touch saying myself and debbie so eddie and debbie quite like that. uh they're watching the program. they're feeling frustrated with lots of stuff at the moment . they're saying, the moment. they're saying, please, can you stop this world? i want to get off. i would i

would stop it. if i couldn't. i'd join you in getting off as well. unfortunately, it's beyond my paul my powers. uh, paul says i normally write off embery normally write off paul embery as liberal. however, he as a work liberal. however, he says got to say, some of says i've got to say, some of his comments this evening have got merit. >> liberal me. is he >> a woke liberal me. is he getting says he getting the right? paul says he is me with prince is confusing me with prince harry. really? >> well, pippa says i never confused paul with prince harry. he looks more like van gogh to me. they go, let's talk me. well, they go, let's talk rugby, we? because rugby, shall we? because um, apparently in apparently playing rugby in schools a of child schools is a form of child abuse. this is according to some sports expert. it's apparently these sports should sports expert. it's apparently theconsidered sports should sports expert. it's apparently theconsidered spoilo should be considered abusive to children's brains. um, a couple of viewers on this before i bnng of viewers on this before i bring panel in, because lots bring the panel in, because lots of have been getting in of you have been getting in touch. i felt for touch. uh trish says i felt for a long time that rugby should should be banned children. a long time that rugby should shotpotentialined children. a long time that rugby should shotpotential injuries children. a long time that rugby should shotpotential injuries chilsoen. the potential injuries are so serious and the effects on developing brains can be catastrophic. and for these reasons, that reasons, she agrees that it should regarded child should be regarded as child abuse, less i've never abuse, but less says i've never heard anything so in all heard anything so silly in all my trying to ban rugby my life as trying to ban rugby for kids. it's the best sport to instil discipline and team

spirit in youngsters. where are you on it, moylan? you on it, lord moylan? >> played rugby and >> i've never played rugby and indeed most of my life skills were i at were developed when i was at school. uh finding new and inventive ways of getting of inventive ways of getting out of games , um, which i did with very considerable. >> i had you down as a scrum half. >> daniel. >> daniel. >> i'm shocked. >> i'm shocked. >> this this led to me becoming quite good mates with the head of games, and i stayed in touch with him later in life. and he was a former professional footballer and a serious sportsman. he's dead now and he told later in life, he said told me later in life, he said that his had gone to that when his son had gone to secondary school, he had gone to the head of games at that secondary and had said, secondary school and had said, you can play sport. i want you can play any sport. i want to be a great sportsman. i want to be a great sportsman. i want to be a great sportsman. i want to be a great sportsman, but i do not want my boy playing rugby. and that's because he knew as as a someone deeply knew as a as a someone deeply into it. the risks and the dangers could arise if, um, dangers that could arise if, um, from playing rugby and that that stayed with me , that was stayed with me, that was somebody who was not anti sport and madly pro sport and a professional sportsman in his

past . past. >> paul, um, i loved pe at school and i just fear that we're into a little bit of a culture of safety ism around some of this stuff where we want to eradicate any risk for children . and, you know, we children. and, you know, we often hear health and safety gone mad. i don't want to caricature it by that. but in that way. but i do think there's a danger that we can fall into that trap of saying, because there is some risk involved. actually, we're going to ignore all of benefits and the all of the benefits and the benefits of kids taking part in sport, think are immense . and sport, i think are immense. and i say that as someone who was constant playing sport as a kid, not just in terms of the physical exercise and the mental well—being that it helps you to develop. the side of develop. but the social side of it as well , the feeling it as well, the feeling of reward when you've put in a good performance and i just see this potentially as a bit of a slippery slope, because the argument then could be, well, you know , football, do stop you know, football, do we stop kids playing football kids from playing football because injuries occur in because the injuries occur in football they have to head

football and they have to head the ball so on. and cricket the ball and so on. and cricket is with a very hard ball, is played with a very hard ball, and some kids go skiing. um, and l, and some kids go skiing. um, and i, i do think, you know, where there is particular evidence then the game may have to adapt to accommodate what's changed, but only as a last resort. to accommodate what's changed, but only as a last resort . well, but only as a last resort. well, apparently a great thing playing sport for kids. >> apparently more than 4000 under eighteens referred under eighteens were referred for intervention for medical intervention for suspected concussion suffered on the playing field in the last 12 months. 73% of those. so the months. uh, 73% of those. so the vast majority, i've got to say, uh, were for playing rugby. um, now, you guys, this has really got. >> well, you're from hull. >> well, you're from hull. >> you must know how important rugby is to the local. >> i'm not really a rugby person. i'm more hull city. i've got to say. rugby. >> yeah, you've got hull kingston rovers uh, and hull fc so big thing. so is a big thing. >> but no, we were more of a football family. ian says rugby is closest get to is the closest you can get to being the military without being in the military without actually being in the military. it much . um, he actually being in the military. it if much. um, he actually being in the military. it if rugby much . um, he actually being in the military. it if rugby is much. um, he actually being in the military. it if rugby is child :h . um, he actually being in the military. it if rugby is child abuse, , he says if rugby is child abuse, then surely. what about cadets

and scouts etc. being the same? bnan and scouts etc. being the same? brian says i took my two lads to the local rugby club and it taught them respect and manners i.e. showed any i.e. if they showed any disrespect to the decisions disrespect to the ref decisions and the team were punished . um, and the team were punished. um, mummy says he says to the opposite team. john says how dare people say that rugby is child abuse? um, what about all the kids being allowed to be sitting on their phones and gaming machines? he says surely thatis gaming machines? he says surely that is worse. richard says. of course, forcing children to play rugby, um, is child abuse and playing it as an adult is the worst form of , uh, masochistic worst form of, uh, masochistic self abuse, he says. i don't know if this is about forcing kids to be playing rugby. i think it's more about what people are saying. so in this report, it says that no concussive to head is concussive hit to the head is benign. talks about the benign. it talks about the potential impact in life later on, including early onset dementia, parkinson's and problems with memory. oh god, i was hoping that the last segment in dewberry tavern, i was thinking, how can i get some nice stuff? i know it

nice upbeat stuff? i know it isn't about sports. within 20s. it's deteriorated into talking about serious illness . i'll do about serious illness. i'll do better next week. paul thank you very much for your company. lord moylan, thank you for yours. thank you michelle, and you know the drill. you much the drill. thank you very much for your on tv, online, for your company on tv, online, radio, wherever you are. thank you company. have a you for your company. have a good weekend. you good weekend. i'll see you monday night. >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar the sponsors of weather solar, the sponsors of weather on . gb news. on. gb news. >> i'm alex deakin and this is your latest weather update from the met office for gb news. good evening. tomorrow we'll stay pretty mild. across the south, a blustery day again across parts of the north, with a mixture of sunshine and showers. we've got high pressure to the south, low pressure to the north in pressure to the north and in between front is between this weather front is just southwards as the just edging southwards as the isobars squeezing together. it's been over northeast been very gusty over northeast england southeast scotland been very gusty over northeast englancthat utheast scotland been very gusty over northeast englancthat way ast scotland been very gusty over northeast englancthat way into '>cotland been very gusty over northeast englancthat way into this and staying that way into this evening. but slowly overnight the winds will ease at least a little bit. staying breezy

though, particularly in the far north more showers in here. though, particularly in the far north patchyore showers in here. though, particularly in the far north patchy rain howers in here. though, particularly in the far north patchy rain for/ers in here. though, particularly in the far north patchy rain for wales here. though, particularly in the far north patchy rain for wales and. some patchy rain for wales and northern england, but many areas staying and look at the staying dry. and look at the temperatures or 10 degrees temperatures 9 or 10 degrees in most and cities , certainly most towns and cities, certainly through wales. through england and wales. so a pretty mild start to the weekend for february. for early february. onto the details for tomorrow and cloudy with some rain into wales , with some rain into wales, particularly on the west coast. some of that rain will trickle into northern england , the into northern england, the midlands maybe east anglia midlands and maybe east anglia later south. most places later. to the south. most places just and cloudy and further just dry and cloudy and further north bright day for much north a bright day for much of northern ireland. southern and eastern scotland, blustery eastern scotland, but blustery again across the again with showers across the highlands and the western isles. a cooler feel here, but again for most places. pretty mild on sunday we'll see a bit more rain tracking back across northern ireland, perhaps into parts of western scotland and across northern england again , much of northern england again, much of the south bar a bit of drizzle over the hills, just dry and fairly getting quite windy fairly drab, getting quite windy in places once more on sunday and going to be mild and again it's going to be mild double digits across the board with in the south, looks

with teens in the south, looks like things are heating up. >> boxt boilers sponsors of weather on gb news .

welcome to the andersons real world tonight on my show we have trade unionist andy mcdonald . unionist andy mcdonald. >> he's going head to head with emma webb and he's also going head to head with alp mehmet . head to head with alp mehmet. i've got a brilliant young lady actress on the show for the first time. she's going to be plugging her movies. she's one to look out for that. charlotte kirk and we've got the legendary