michelle dewberry. and this is dewbs& c0 coming up tonight. did dewbs& co coming up tonight. did you manage to stay awake during that first half an hour of the putin interview? if you managed to get past that, you might have noficed to get past that, you might have noticed that he basically said that boris johnson was was responsible for scuppering negotiations in the war in . negotiations in the war in. ukraine what do you think to that? do you believe that or not? and when it comes to abdul ezedi now, please reckon he's more likely than not off more likely than not jumped off a and died. do you think a bridge and died. do you think that's true, or do you reckon it's the police covering for their incompetence not their own incompetence and not being able to find him? i'll be talking a detective talking to a former detective about also, doctors about that. also, junior doctors there voted go on strike there voted to go on strike again for another five do again for another five days. do they your support or they still have your support or not? and get this, she's sunaks tax return has been published. he's paid over half £1 million in tax on earnings that are above £2 million. last year. some people i can tell you their

fury this how out of touch can you be. they say what do you make to it ? well, you be. they say what do you make to it? well, we're going to get stuck into all of that and more. but before we do, let's cross live for tonight's latest news headlines as . news headlines as. >> michelle, thank you very much. good evening from the gb newsrooms. just gone 6:00 leading the news tonight. it's now believed the chemical attacker abdul ezedi, who injured a mother and her two daughters, may have fallen into the thames in a briefing at scotland yard earlier this afternoon, police said their main working hypothesis is that he has gone into the water but they say no body has yet been found. the metropolitan police say the 35 year old was last seen on cctv leaning over the railings of chelsea bridge. for those watching on tv , you can those watching on tv, you can see that figure just walking across the bridge around 11:30

pm. last wednesday. that was p.m. last wednesday. that was four hours after the incident in south london, and that was the last time he was seen. marine units. we understand, will now be carrying out searches of the river thames, but they say it could be very difficult to locate a body due to fast moving water. police have also added the victim of the attack on the sist the victim of the attack on the 31st of january is still very ill in hospital and unable to speak to officers . in other speak to officers. in other news, piers morgan has accused the duke of sussex of what he called ruthless intrusion into the private lives of the royal family he hears the daily mirror editor , former daily mirror editor, former daily mirror edhon editor, former daily mirror editor, speaking to reporters earlier invading the privacy of the royal family is utterly reprehensible and on that i share prince harry's opinion . share prince harry's opinion. >> i just wish he'd stop doing it. well, that comes after prince harry's claim against mirror group newspapers was settled today.

>> he singled out the former daily mirror editor, saying he knew what was going on when phones were hacked for stories written about the royals . written about the royals. following today's hearing, harry's lawyer said mirror group newspapers would make an interim payment of £400,000 in damages . payment of £400,000 in damages. the israeli prime minister has announced a plan to evacuate civilians from rafah in the south of gaza, alongside a strategic effort to defeat remaining hamas fighters in the region. it comes as international pressure on israel intensifies, despite criticism from the us president and other warnings from aid groups, israel did launch a deadly air strike on rafah, the last refuge for many gazans, and that raised concerns about the potential high death toll . washington has high death toll. washington has emphasised the need for israel to consider the plight of civilians before any further military operation in rafah . joe military operation in rafah. joe biden has described israel's response as over the top . back response as over the top. back here in the uk , rishi sunak says here in the uk, rishi sunak says that president putin's accusations that the west and

nato are the cause of the ukraine war are, he says, clearly ridiculous . speaking to clearly ridiculous. speaking to tucker carlson, the russian president said the invasion was necessary to prevent ukraine from posing a threat to russia by joining nato. putin also told carlson that he has no interest in expanding the war or having any dialogue with the us president unless he says certain demands are met. >> if you really want to stop fighting , you need to stop fighting, you need to stop supplying weapons. it will be over within a few weeks. that's it . and then we can agree on it. and then we can agree on some terms before you do that, stop . what's easier ? why would i stop. what's easier? why would i call him ? what should i talk to call him? what should i talk to him about ? him about? >> we've heard today that junior doctors will go on strike again for another five days, later this month, in their long running dispute over pay, the bma says that the walkout will be between the 24th of february and the 28th of february, and it comes after their latest talks

with the government broke down health secretary victoria atkins has criticised the move, saying the actions show the bma the actions show that the bma aren't ready to be reasonable when comes to pay offer, when it comes to a pay offer, but the labour leader, sir keir starmer , says it's up to the starmer, says it's up to the government end to it. government to put an end to it. >> i don't want these strikes to go ahead. i don't think anybody who uses the nhs wants the strikes to go ahead. i don't think the doctors want them to go ahead. i do want is for go ahead. what i do want is for the government in the the government to get in the room and negotiate bring room and negotiate and bring this to an end. >> rishi personal tax >> rishi sunak's personal tax documents today revealed documents have today revealed that over half £1 that he paid over half £1 million in uk tax last year. that he paid over half £1 million in uk tax last year . the million in uk tax last year. the prime minister's earnings include nearly £1.3 million in capital gains , with over capital gains, with over £290,000 from other interests and dividends, rather than a full tax return. downing street published a summary of his taxable income in the uk, and as a former resident of california in the us , the prime minister in the us, the prime minister also separately paid just over $6,800 in tax in the same year. essex police have today

confirmed that two dogs that fatally attacked a grandmother in jaywick were excel bullies. 68 year old esther martin was reportedly visiting her 11 year old grandson when she was attacked by those two dogs on saturday. they have since been destroyed . a 39 year old man was destroyed. a 39 year old man was arrested on suspicion of dangerous dog offences , but he dangerous dog offences, but he has since been released on unconditional bail until march . unconditional bail until march. and finally, irish police are investigating the death of a six year old boy who was found in a car early this morning. a woman in her 30s was arrested near dunmore east and is in custody. we understand irish police are conducting enquiries and awaiting post—mortem results. investigators are at the scene. they're gathering evidence and locals have also expressed their sadness and their shock . for the sadness and their shock. for the latest stories, you can sign up to gb news alerts by scanning the qr code on your screen. or go to gb news. com forward slash

alerts . alerts. >> thank you very much for that . >> thank you very much for that. i'm michelle dewberry. i'm keeping you company right through till 7:00 tonight. we made it, didn't we? almost to the end of a week. i'm exhausted today. i've been so busy moving around all day as though i am a woman. the cooking, the cleaning . i've done a bit of skipping a little bit of dancing, little bit of shimmying . it's all been bit of shimmying. it's all been going on. i can tell you. it's exhausting moving around all day long, as if you're a woman . if long, as if you're a woman. if you don't know what i'm talking about. you should have watched my programme night, mr my programme last night, mr belter. me belter. anyway keeping me company my programme company tonight on my programme until tonight. got until 7:00 tonight. i've got a new face. we like those everybody, don't we? sketchwriter and columnist at the telegraph, madeline the daily telegraph, madeline grant. good evening to you. hello and trade unionist and hello and the trade unionist and the broadcast writer and someone who moving around who hasn't been moving around all though he's a woman. all day as though he's a woman. paula mbappe you didn't say paula mbappe glad you didn't say an face. an old face. >> i know. >> i know. >> tell you, i think >> well, i tell you, i think i've done bit of damage,

i've done a bit of damage, actually, to my shoulders when i just practised that shimmy. when you you probably you get to my age, you probably shouldn't be shimmying anything. quite frankly. uh, anyway, look, you know the drill, you? you know the drill, don't you? on just on this programme, it's not just about us. it's very much about you you can get in you guys at home. you can get in touch me all the usual touch with me all the usual ways. email me ways. you can email me gbviews@gbnews.uk. or you gbviews@gbnews.uk. um, or you can me at gb news. uh, can tweet me, me at gb news. uh, let's off though. did you let's kick off though. did you see interview? last see the interview? uh, last night? hours ? uh, of night? early hours? uh, of course i'm talking about tucker carlson and vladimir did carlson and vladimir putin. did you watch i got to say , the you watch it? i got to say, the first half an hour, to i had almost, like, convince myself to stay with it. i was so excited about this interview. i had the popcorn ready and then when i started going back, was it like the ninth century or even earlier back to. earlier? yeah, it was back to. and says, if you'll indulge and he says, if you'll indulge me a minute, i'll me for 30s to a minute, i'll give you a bit of history. half an hour later, everyone, he was still going. have you seen that interview anyway, interview yet or not? anyway, a few came out of that. few key points came out of that. one the ones i want to one of the ones that i want to touch on with you guys tonight is what had to say about our is what he had to say about our previous prime minister, boris

johnson. play that, johnson. let's just play that, um, we? for of you um, shall we? for those of you that perhaps see it, he that perhaps didn't see it, he even put preliminary even put his preliminary signature document. signature on the document. >> i am telling you about. but then he publicly stated to the whole world, we were ready to sign this document, but mr johnson, then the prime minister of great britain , came in, of great britain, came in, dissuaded us from doing this, saying it was better to fight russia. they would give everything needed for us to return . what was lost during the return. what was lost during the clashes with russia. and we agreed with this proposal. look his statement has been published. he said it publicly. can they return to this or not? the question is, do they want it or . not? or. not? >> um, well i go, what do you make to that at home? uh, madeleine, your thoughts? >> well, i thought was >> well, i thought it was fascinating that he tried so hard to that boris johnson and britain actually played quite a big part in the interview. you know, it was it mentioned know, it was it was mentioned a lot. i think it's partly

obviously i think you have to obviously i think you have to obviously take anything that vladimir putin says with a pinch of salt. and, um, boris johnson and ukraine have both disavowed this that it was boris this story, that it was boris johnson who brakes on a johnson who put the brakes on a peace deal in istanbul. but, you know, the fact that that know, i think the fact that that he is , you know, trying to put he is, you know, trying to put the cat amongst the pigeons as he did when he said, for example, that it was the cia who blew up the nord stream pipeline. that's kind of what blew up the nord stream pipeexpect. at's kind of what blew up the nord stream pipeexpect. at's the! of what blew up the nord stream pipeexpect. at's the fact what blew up the nord stream pipeexpect. at's the fact that you expect. but the fact that britain played a big role to me, that's testament to the fact that's testament to the fact that quite that you know, we were quite crucial early days of, crucial in those early days of, of the war in kind of, um, keeping the anti—putin alliance together making together in the west, making sure like america sure that countries like america and germany, especially didn't kind of go soft. so i think that's a testament to the fact that's a testament to the fact that actually did play quite that we actually did play quite a big role, particularly in the early days of the war. >> and do you think that's a good well think it was good thing? well i think it was morally right. >> is a you know, >> i mean, putin is a you know, unambiguous authoritarian leader who's invaded who's blatantly invaded a neighbour also neighbour and is also a strategic enemy of britain's. i don't think this is a this shows

an absence of self—interest. i mean, i think we're already seeing for example, in the middle east how if, if america taking a very soft line on iran has led to escalation, i think you do sometimes have to put on to, you know , um, show your to, you know, um, show your strategic enemies that they can't get away with that kind of aggression. >> paul mbappe well, i don't know if we'll ever get to the truth, but i think there is some evidence actually, that that did happen that boris johnson did intervene . intervene. >> and in april 22nd, um, there were peace talks going on and bofis were peace talks going on and boris johnson flew out to kyiv and shortly after those peace talks came to an end. and the leader of the parliamentary party, zelenskyy's own parliamentary party, said at the time, boris johnson intervened and scuppered it. time, boris johnson intervened and scuppered it . so, you know, and scuppered it. so, you know, we can dismiss it as some sort of wild conspiracy theory . or we of wild conspiracy theory. or we can say, actually, you know, there evidence that there is some evidence that there is some evidence that there intervention from there was intervention from bofis there was intervention from boris of course he's boris johnson. of course he's going deny he would say going to deny it. he would say that, he? um think that, wouldn't he? um i think the question how do

the bigger question is, how do we the end of this awful we get to the end of this awful war in which thousands of people have lost their lives? the truth is one thing, putin said, and i'm no fan of his. but he said, and he was right. it can only come about through a negotiated settlement. there settlement. at some point there is have is going to have to be a negotiated settlement to end this war. and it strikes me that many people west, um, are many people in the west, um, are not grasp that, even not willing to grasp that, even though it's pretty clear, i think, ukraine is going think, that ukraine is not going to i mean, i have to win this war. i mean, i have to win this war. i mean, i have to say that i opposed to the invasion. i'm no fan of putin, but i think most people recognise now that ukraine is not war. so not going to win this war. so there's options. you know, there's two options. you know, we either continue encouraging them to fight, in which case they will probably go to down a slow and very painful and very costly defeat or we say, look, we've got to try to help you strike a deal, which would be peace, but peace with some honoun peace, but peace with some honour. mhm. um, and i just honour. mhm. um, and ijust don't think that people in the west of grasp that nettle which then invites you to ask the

question, well, why is it that leaders in the west are so obsessed with this particular war, are so focussed on this particular war, are so keen for this particular to war continue for all of their denials that this is a proxy war. i think every intervention that we've seen from leaders of the west , seen from leaders of the west, you know, america and britain and others , shows that we do see and others, shows that we do see it as a proxy war. and i think that's a very sad thing. and as ultimately, i think, prolonged the war and led to thousands of deaths that otherwise wouldn't have , was there? have happened, was there? >> sorry. >> sorry. >> do you think that you >> so do you think that you know, that will simply know, that ukraine will simply have to accept handing over a large chunk of its territory to russia in exchange for peace, and that that's a state of affairs that we should be comfortable with? >> well, we don't know what they would to accept. we would be prepared to accept. we don't putin would don't know what putin would demand. to look demand. i think we have to look at the minsk at something like the minsk accords, example, which accords, for example, which was the of sort of the basis of some sort of settlement. on the one hand, you know, guarding ukraine's territorial sovereignty, but at

the time giving a certain the same time giving a certain amount of autonomy to the ethnic russians in the donbas region. uh, and both sides blamed each other for minsk , you know, not other for minsk, you know, not in the end, succeeding . but i in the end, succeeding. but i think if we're serious about peace, then and i don't think many people in the west are then you have to be looking at something like that. and the truth madeleine, that truth is, madeleine, that wherever there is a conflict over territory, unless one side completely vanquished the other, there has to be a compromise. we saw that in northern ireland, you know, the same people who are now saying in the west under no circumstances should we negotiate with putin. yeah, all glorified the belfast agreement , glorified the belfast agreement, where effectively we negotiated with the ira and gave them a certain amount of what? of what they wanted. so there's a stinking hypocrisy about this whole don't negotiate with putin thing. >> well, the thing is, i think i agree with a lot of what you've said and particularly about how, you know, it's difficult for ukraine win the war outright. ukraine to win the war outright. it's also going to be very difficult to the difficult for russia to win the

war i mean, it's war outright. i mean, it's pretty they've taken severe losses it's interesting losses is um, it's interesting that recently had to act that putin recently had to act to a anti—war challenger to prevent a anti—war challenger running in the election. they had to come up with some kind of constitutional legal jiggery pokery prevent one of pokery to prevent one of his opponents running against opponents from running against him. had just come him. and this guy had just come out nowhere and had a huge out of nowhere and had a huge following. basically on an anti—war there were anti—war slate. and there were so many families in russia who've, who've lost, who've, who've who've lost, loved ones or have, um , can't loved ones or have, um, can't reach their loved ones and russia has always had historic form in treating its, its civilians its soldiers like civilians and its soldiers like cannon you know, cannon fodder. so you know, putin expected it to be very quick and easy to take ukraine. and that didn't happen either. so i think where we're at is a kind unpleasant stalemate. i kind of unpleasant stalemate. i think one of the things we could offer is, is, know, offer is, is, you know, neutrality nato , neutrality in terms of nato, because that is putin's big bugbean >> you know, ukraine joins >> you know, if ukraine joins nato, effectively is the nato, that effectively is the enemy on his doorstep. now i think that's probably a price worth paying to say, look, there does probably need to be that buffer. buffer zone in the same

way. by the way, that if it was the other way round and had a chinese stroke, russian military alliance, you know , sent troops alliance, you know, sent troops in uh, or set up bases in cuba, as happened in the 1960s, of course, with the old soviet union , does anyone doubt that union, does anyone doubt that the white house would go absolutely ballistic ? no pun absolutely ballistic? no pun intended, absolutely ballistic at that. they would they would of course, say absolutely no. we know where we have in this military alliance on our doorstep . you know, it's not doorstep. you know, it's not acceptable. there needs to be some sort of buffer zone. well the truth is, whether we like it or not, putin and the russians look at ukraine in a very similar way . you know, nato was similar way. you know, nato was set up explicitly as an anti—soviet organisation . and we anti—soviet organisation. and we know that. so when the russians see that organisation encroaching ever closer to its border, naturally they are going to think, look, this is a bit disconcerting for us in the same way as i say it would be for america if it was the other way

around. but we don't think of that. and in the west we i don't think we ever look at how a situation is perceived by our so—called enemy. if we were to do what they're doing, if do what they're doing, or if they do what it is that they were to do what it is that we're doing, would we react we're doing, how would we react to um, and you know, to that? um, and you know, i think when it comes to other wars, we often call for peace. we for ceasefires in we often call for ceasefires in this one. i think it's striking. >> do we? >> do we? >> who's who? where are those voices calling voices that are often calling for peace? all i ever for peace? because all i ever seem to hear is people desperately trying to get involved strikes involved and fair the strikes and rest of it. and all the rest of it. >> i think no, absolutely >> no, i think no, absolutely not. not always. but there are some cases where, when some cases where, you know, when india, pakistan, example, india, pakistan, for example, occasionally have their skirmishes kashmir skirmishes over the kashmir region. very quick to region. people are very quick to call for peace when they think they don't necessarily have a strategic interest . um, they strategic interest. um, they haven't done in this . and what haven't done in this. and what they've done is they've egged ukraine on and on and on, and we're now in an absolute quagmire. and there doesn't seem any way out of it. um, and i think we have to take a certain amount of responsible for that.

>> do you make of it all at >> what do you make of it all at home? i can tell you now, you're quite divided. i'll just give you flavour. you a flavour. >> says you would have >> bernard says you would have to be the gullible person to be the most gullible person in room to believe anything in the room to believe anything at comes out of putin's at all that comes out of putin's mouth. but mac, however, has mouth. but mac, however, he has a different view. he a completely different view. he says , the has says in summary, the west has putin to arrangement syndrome . putin to arrangement syndrome. what do you make to that? who's side are you on? did you watch that interview and what did you make to it? what did you think about tucker carlson, the way that that that he conducted that interview? lot people interview? a lot of people saying basically saying that he basically gave putin too much of an easy ride. did he or not? you tell me after the want talk to you the break, i want to talk to you about abdul ezedi. apparently he, um, has gone into the thames suspected to dead. really i'm suspected to be dead. really i'm going to speak to a former detective to take on that. so you also want to you you also want to talk to you about joe biden and his response to the fact that he's losing his memories and lots more, not least sunak return. least rishi sunak tax return. have how earnt have you seen how much he earnt last year? see you in two.

to gb news radio .

to gb news radio. >> five rishi sunak here. join me for a special gb news people's forum live on monday the 12th of february. i want to hear about the issues that matter to you for your chance to be part of the audience and to put your questions to me. scan the qr code on screen or go to gb news. com see you there . gb news. com see you there. >> hello there. i'm michelle jubin. i'm with you till 7:00 tonight. the sketchwriter and columnist at the daily telegraph, madeline grants, is alongside me, as is the trade unionist and broadcaster paul embery. welcome back everybody. unionist and broadcaster paul embify. welcome back everybody. unionist and broadcaster paul embify. w�*werele back everybody. unionist and broadcaster paul embify. w�*were just|ck everybody. unionist and broadcaster paul embify. w�*were just listeningiody. and if you were just listening there, will have heard rishi there, you will have heard rishi sunak of course, on monday. what a us all. we will be a treat for us all. we will be live the north east. i say live from the north east. i say a yes, they're letting a week as yes, they're letting me out. everybody i be me out. everybody i will be there as well. it's your opportunity, not ours. yours to ask rishi sunak. whatever other

questions you have for him . if questions you have for him. if you're in and around the north east, come us. uh, if east, come and join us. uh, if not, get your questions to us. get out your smartphone . take get out your smartphone. take a picture that qr code on the picture of that qr code on the screen, and i'll tell all screen, and i'll tell you all the details you need to the details that you need to know. you go. i'm looking know. there you go. i'm looking forward hope that you forward to it. i hope that you are too . uh, now let's talk are too. uh, now let's talk about a story that we've been covering, haven't we? now, i think we're on day ten. um, of course about that. course i'm speaking about that. suspected chemical attacker, abdul azizi. the met police have issued update on a couple of issued an update on a couple of hours ago now, actually saying that quoting is that def i'm quoting this def is the most probable outcome for the most probable outcome for the guy that they not the guy that they have not managed all managed to find. we've seen all the footage, haven't we? the cctv footage, haven't we? there he is . if you're there he is. if you're listening, not watching i'll describe it. the fella's meandering along like he ain't got a care in the world making absolutely no attempt whatsoever , his damaged face. , uh, to hide his damaged face. i've got to remind you all that he did wander along vauxhall bridge. and in case you're not familiar london vauxhall familiar with london vauxhall bridge it , it familiar with london vauxhall bridge it, it has bridge at the end of it, it has mi6. so i mean, the guy has

sauntered past one of the most high security , uh, buildings in high security, uh, buildings in london, and they still can't find him. anyway, joining me now is former detective peter bleksley. now peter, some of . my bleksley. now peter, some of. my viewers, i know them well. they'll be getting in touch now, saying this whole theory about him jumping into the river. this is to cover the backsides of the met police, because basically, they're just not doing their job in finding him. what do you say to that, abdul shakoor azadi originally from afghanistan. >> who smuggled himself into the uk in the back of a lorry, who made multiple applications for asylum and in between two of those applications was convicted of two sex offences , who was of of two sex offences, who was of course wanted for a vicious, wicked , vindictive attack on a wicked, vindictive attack on a woman and two young children, dunng woman and two young children, during which a number of police officers and members of the pubuc officers and members of the public also got injured, is dead i >> -- >> how do you know? >> how do you know? >> end of story.

>> end of story. >> how do you know? >> how do you know? >> because the metropolitan police have done exhaustive cctv, trawls and what viewers and listeners might not appreciate. and that's perfectly understandable, is that a negative cctv noncy sighting is often as important as an actual sighting, because what it allows you to do through a process of elimination is say, well, if somebody is not seen travelling through this particular spot where there is cctv coverage , where there is cctv coverage, then they must have taken a different route. and that's a perfectly reliable theory to work upon. what the met have doneis work upon. what the met have done is done. exhaust postive checks of cctv systems authority owned, privately owned , publicly owned, privately owned, publicly owned. the comprehensively placed him on chelsea bridge . um placed him on chelsea bridge. um no dispute about that whatsoever. what happens thereafter is that exhaust of

cctv coverage shows that he did not exit that bridge . so whilst not exit that bridge. so whilst the metropolitan police will tell you it's a working hypothesis, i'm telling you, he went in the thames, which at this time of the year, in fact most of the year is largely unsurvivable . unsurvivable. >> so that bridge, um, it's got, as you say, it's got cctv on it. hence we've got those sightings of him on said bridge. it's also quite, um, a fairly . busy quite, um, a fairly. busy bridge. it's one of the key crossing points for south west london, so you'll have lots of cars, um, that are driving by, many of which will have dash cams. apartments cams. you've got apartments overlooking , um, that bridge, overlooking, um, that bridge, many which will have, uh, many of which will have, uh, security cameras , doorbells, security cameras, doorbells, whatever it is. so if your theory is absolutely spot on, i.e. he's gone over the bridge or into the thames, why isn't there footage of that? or into the thames, why isn't the because e of that? or into the thames, why isn't the because not that? or into the thames, why isn't the because not everywhere in >> because not everywhere in london and the uk has blanket cctv coverage . there is

cctv coverage. there is legislation around the scale of the view that a cctv camera can have.if the view that a cctv camera can have. if it's local authority. they get a greater amount of permission to cover things like traffic and the such, like if you have cctv on a private dwelling then you are not actually permitted to capture the images that go beyond the boundanes the images that go beyond the boundaries of that dwelling . so boundaries of that dwelling. so not everywhere in london and the uk has blank coverage. >> let's rewind that and go back to the night of the attack. i think it was about 7:30 there or thereabouts, wasn't it. um, and thereabouts, wasn't it. um, and the police were asking people have you got dash cam footage or ring doorbell footage or whatever, can you look at whatever, can you have a look at it and let us know? there was a lot criticism, though at the lot of criticism, though at the time, and i've got to admit from me as well, um, saying, well, why didn't the police release a descriptive image or a descriptive terme or whatever pnor descriptive terme or whatever prior half one, 2:00 in the prior to half one, 2:00 in the afternoon? are we missing? afternoon? what are we missing? >> yes, of the following >> oh, yes, of the following day. and in addition to azadi

walking very close to the security services building, he actually walked past new scotland yard not long after the attack. we're only talking about attack. we're only talking about a matter of 2 or 3 hours after the attack. >> police issue a descriptive either image or, you know, just description before 1:30. the next afternoon , by which time next afternoon, by which time this fellow is probably long gone. >> yeah, that will be a question for the metropolitan police to answer. and i am never a defender of the indefensible . defender of the indefensible. but this investigation is that indefensible, because a lot of people said to me or michelle, who do you think you are? >> or you think you know better than the met police? there was people have been saying to me and other that my and other people that have my view, on a second. view, well, hang on a second. maybe police didn't to maybe the police didn't want to endanger people. this is a endanger people. maybe this is a standard protocol not standard policing protocol not to those descriptions. to issue those descriptions. is it? >> maybe in 2024 where we >> or maybe in 2024 where we have senior leadership have senior police leadership that fluffy woke that are so fluffy, woke and liberal, often scared of liberal, they're often scared of their shadows. did they want their own shadows. did they want to know comprehensively that the images they were going to

release were exactly of the person that they wanted? did they act with caution again , we they act with caution again, we would have to ask them, but this investigation has proceeded in the manner that it has done, because as as the met have admitted, they've had their best detectives , experienced detectives, experienced detectives, experienced detectives, detective who are used to conducting fugitive hunts for terrorists and murderers and the like, which is all well and good. but if you live in london and you get burgled, have your car stolen or a shopkeeper plagued by shoplifting and as a report described today , they are described today, they are reporting offences of child sex abuse, then unfortunately , you abuse, then unfortunately, you will find that the largest police service in the land of often comes up very, very short indeed. indeed. >> and actually everyone will be familiar with this story about how he got back into his car, didn't he? and tried to escape. but actually he crashed the car. if he'd have managed to get into that car and drive off, um, lots

of streets around those parts. a 20 hour zones. if he'd 20 mile an hour zones. if he'd had faster than 20 miles had driven faster than 20 miles an hour. i can bet your bottom dollar he'd had been caught there. mess around there. the don't mess around with of things with those kind of things anyway, madeleine and paul, what do all? do you make to it all? >> i definitely don't want >> well, i definitely don't want to disagree with peter having seen on show seen him in action on the show hunted, would i would hunted, i think i would i would trust to where people trust him to know where people are not. um i mean, are hidden or not. um i mean, obviously it's tempting to take the view that there a little the view that there is a little bit of, of, uh, backside covering should we say, um, because been these because it has been one of these cases seems to speak to cases where it seems to speak to the fears that many people have around police that, you around the police that, you know, the inaction and the inability quickly and inability to act quickly and efficiently the efficiently and of course, the fact on camera walking fact that he's on camera walking past not help. but past mi six does not help. but yes, i think peter's probably, um, about right here. >> i as well bowed down to >> and i as well bowed down to peter's operational experience. and completely accept what he says.i and completely accept what he says. i think the wider debate for the public almost certainly which will continue, is why was this guy in the country , um, you this guy in the country, um, you know, he had his asylum application, as we understand

it, rejected twice , uh, it, rejected twice, uh, converted to christianity , made converted to christianity, made an appeal, a tribunal said convert is a christianity. >> i mean, how you can say that with a straight face and believe that it's true is beyond me. well, that a fella didn't convert to christianity. well, actually, he probably did on paper to try and get in. but i mean, come on now. paper to try and get in. but i me and ome on now. paper to try and get in. but i me and that'sn now. paper to try and get in. but i me and that's the »w. paper to try and get in. but i me and that's the debate that we >> and that's the debate that we need have. and of course, need to have. and of course, there was not, not there was the not, not insignificant matter his, um, insignificant matter of his, um, conviction in conviction for sexual crimes in 2018. so those are the big 2018. um, so those are the big questions, they're not going questions, and they're not going to go away. >> there you >> well, there you go. >> well, there you go. >> can make your own mind >> you can make your own mind up. but for now, bleksley, up. but for now, peter bleksley, thank for coming thank you very much for coming in. appreciate your time and in. we appreciate your time and your insight. thank you. um, let me on because you me just move on because if you are regular viewer to this are a regular viewer to this program, will recall that a program, you will recall that a few we were looking few days ago, we were looking back at biden, uh, of the back at biden, uh, some of the kind mistakes has kind of mistakes that he has been and asking whether been making and asking whether or he's safe, to be or not he's safe, actually to be the of states. the president of united states. let's a little listen to let's have a little listen to what he has had to say. >> so there's some attention paid language in the

paid to some language in the report about my recollection of events. there's even referenced report about my recollection of eveni;. there's even referenced report about my recollection of eveni;. the|remembereferenced report about my recollection of eveni;. the|remember ever|ced report about my recollection of even i ;. the|remember ever when that i don't remember ever when my died . how in the hell my son died. how in the hell dare he raise that totally out of your memory ? of your memory? >> and can you continue as president ? president? >> my memory is so bad, i let you speak . that's that's that's you speak. that's that's that's my memory has gotten worse . mr my memory has gotten worse. mr president, my memory is not. my memory is fine. my memory. take a look at what i've done since i've become president . i've become president. >> what do you make of that, ladies and gents? at home. did he convince you or not? paul embry? >> well, i'm against any form of ageism. i think in any job, if you're good enough, you're young enough. you're good enough, you're young enough . but i have to say, this enough. but i have to say, this is quite painful, actually. what we're time , we're witnessing in real time, uh, is the decline . the very uh, is the decline. the very sharp decline, i think, of an 81 year old president. it's a demanding job for even a young person . and i think it's pretty person. and i think it's pretty clear that he cannot realistically stand again. and the special counsel report that came out yesterday was

absolutely devastating and actually said openly that the president's recall was, you know, his memory is strictly limited. he couldn't remember key facts about his personal life, about his political career. and i just think that his friends and allies should be saying to him his personal interests and in the us's interests and in the us's interest . s look, it's time interest. s look, joe, it's time to step aside and let someone else pick up the baton. >> yeah, madeleine. >> yeah, madeleine. >> well, it's there's been an extraordinary and i think quite a shameful almost. the word is like an omerta amongst many journalists in the us, especially that they would not talk about this. and it was one of these unsayable things for a very, very long time. and now it's become so obvious that it can no longer be ignored. and i think they have done the american people and the world. you know, the president is the leader of the free world a great disservice by not having that conversation. and also the sheer arrogance of the democrat , that arrogance of the democrat, that high that last year, for high command that last year, for example, they were trying to prevent them from being any kind

of debate amongst any other of open debate amongst any other joe biden and any other challenges to that role on the bafis challenges to that role on the basis that they they thought it would be better from a pr perspective simply to kind of have a coronation for biden, because he might come off badly in any sort of public debate. it was very kind of command and control, and they've created this most almighty for this most almighty mess for them. think paul is them. and i think paul is exactly that, um, it's now exactly right that, um, it's now getting to a point where surely, surely something has to done surely something has to be done about it about this, because otherwise it will just hand, you know, it will just hand, you know, it will just hand, you know, it will just give the presidency to donald trump. yeah. >> i mean, i've got to say and i said this when we discussed this a few days ago, as well, there's something about this that makes me really uncomfortable. me feel really uncomfortable. all because, um, know, he is all because, um, you know, he is an man and, you know , i an elderly man and, you know, i agree with you. i do think you're watching someone that a kind of decline and something about that. and then the commentary about that decline makes feel really makes me feel really uncomfortable. yeah but it is a conversation that needs to be

had, the role that he has. had, given the role that he has. um, john says allowing biden to continue. michelle is a form of abuse, and it's actually dangerous. he's like he's likely to declare war without anybody knowing. i'm not sure it ever gets to that stage. um, but i hear your point. um john says he white house, he should be in a care home. it's frightening that he's in charge of the us . and he's in charge of the us. and you see, this is the point, john, because john ends his sentence there by basically saying he's a public laughing stock . and i don't like that. stock. and i don't like that. i know that makes me uncomfortable. >> the thing is, as well, it's not he's a monarch where not like he's a monarch where you go on and and it you can go on and on, and it doesn't really if you're doesn't really matter if you're health because most of health declines, because most of your powers are exercised by the government behalf. yeah government on your behalf. yeah he president and he's the he is the president and he's the commander chief of the us commander in chief of the us armed forces. and he has got to have his finger on the pulse. he's got his finger on the button, but he's got to have his finger on the pulse as well. so, um, and it's just pretty clear, i think that he's just not i

mean, even in the press conference where he was rebutting the allegation that his failing, his memory is failing, he confused presidents of egypt confused the presidents of egypt and humiliating, and mexico. it was humiliating, really. point, really. it's a good point, because america, because actually in america, they extraordinary levels they have extraordinary levels of are vested they have extraordinary levels of the are vested they have extraordinary levels of the president are vested they have extraordinary levels of the president far are vested they have extraordinary levels of the president far morezsted they have extraordinary levels of the president far more than in the president far more than many leaders. many comparable world leaders. >> so the stakes are >> you know, so the stakes are even higher in states. even higher in the states. >> so do you make it all >> so what do you make of it all at i'll also bring in your at home? i'll also bring in your response as well to that. abdul. um azadi story. you buy that um azadi story. do you buy that story what the police are story that what the police are saying, know what he's saying, that you know what he's dead. you slightly more dead. are you slightly more suspicious, you hang suspicious, do you think? hang on you just saying on a second. are you just saying that you actually can't that because you actually can't find thoughts on find him? um, your thoughts on all i also to talk all of that? i also want to talk to as well about junior to you as well about junior doctors. they've announced yet more strikes. are you still backing rishi sunak, backing them? and rishi sunak, did much he earned did you hear how much he earned last year? it any our last year? is it any of our business not? see you in

radio. >> hi there. i'm michelle dewberry and i'm keeping you company right through till 7:00

tonight. alongside me, i've still got paula embry and madeline grant keeping me company . um, madeline grant keeping me company. um, you madeline grant keeping me company . um, you guys again madeline grant keeping me company. um, you guys again , you company. um, you guys again, you are quite divided. um, on the putin we discuss that . um, at putin we discuss that. um, at the beginning of the program . the beginning of the program. um, i have to say, you really are divided. lots of you saying , are divided. lots of you saying, um, as i mentioned at the start of the program, that i actually don't believe anything putin says. uh, lots of you saying that some of things that he that some of the things that he was saying made sense. was saying actually made sense. uh, think that abdul uh, what do you think that abdul ezedi situation about whether or not he's gone the bridge or not he's gone over the bridge or not, thoughts that one? not, your thoughts on that one? but talk. junior but for now, let's talk. junior doctor, because doctor, shall we? because they're strike they're going on strike again for time since march for the 10th time since march last apparently they last year. apparently they are still, course, demanding that still, of course, demanding that 35% increase in their salary. it's all about pay restoration, isn't it? back until 2008, paul mbappe your thoughts, the amount would just simply make up for 15 years of falling real wages, which they've suffered , which which they've suffered, which many people in the private sector and in the public sector have suffered. >> and when you look at their

increased workload, right. >> can i just ask you quickly on that first point, because there'll viewers writing in there'll be viewers writing in so when you say 15 years, so when you say it's 15 years, you pay so when you say it's 15 years, you pay union real you know, of pay union real wages. but then people wages. yeah. but then people will write in and say, but actually a lot of people joined, um, pathway to be um, the kind of pathway to be a junior doctor 2008. so junior doctor after 2008. so they knew that t's and c's and they knew that t's and c's and they knew that t's and c's and they knew pay and it was they knew the pay and it was cool for them they accepted cool for them and they accepted it, they didn't because it, but they didn't because let's you know, let's say they joined, you know, in pluck a year out in 2012, let's pluck a year out of the air. >> they didn't think that they were going to have another, you know, 13 or whatever it is know, 13 years or whatever it is of in wages. but of fall in real wages. no. but what join on what i'm saying join on particular terms. >> if you joined on 2012 and picking year, if you picking your year, but if you joined on 2012 or you became a junior or whatever in junior doctor or whatever in 2012, was unhappy 2012, if you was unhappy with the thought that the wage then and thought that it the wage then and thought that h been the wage then and thought that it been what it was it should have been what it was in 2008, well, why did you accept ts and cs from 2012? accept the ts and cs from 2012? >> then? some of the many of them have been place since 2008. let's let's be honest, but >> let's let's be honest, but the idea you should accept the idea that you should accept fall real wages because fall in real wages just because you joined a on a particular you joined on a on a particular time, on particular terms and

conditions, accept . and conditions, i don't accept. and as going to go on and say, as i was going to go on and say, if you look at the increase in workloads, if you look at the way waiting lists way the horrendous waiting lists that to navigate that they're trying to navigate at inside nhs and at the moment inside the nhs and the these doctors the pressure that these doctors are i think it's are under, i think it's unreasonable say to them year unreasonable to say to them year after year after after year, after year after yean after year, after year after year, years, except year, for 15 years, except a real terms cut, and stop complaining. >> madeleine, i have a lot of sympathy that. and in fact, sympathy with that. and in fact, for the doctors for the junior doctors themselves have many themselves and i have many friends are my age who are friends who are my age who are in this position. you know, the level of burnout that they're experiencing. workload, etc. experiencing. the workload, etc. have sympathy for that. have so much sympathy for that. but the story since but actually, the story since two that two appeared differently, that you then. you get burnout then. well, i don't know. i mean, i, i'm not sure i think i think the 35% is incredibly unrealistic , incredibly unrealistic, particularly because the story for almost all workers in the economy since the financial crash, the private sector where the pensions are nowhere near as generous as what the junior doctors would have, has been, has similar. i mean, we are has been similar. i mean, we are where as as a country, as where we are as as a country, as an where we are as as a country, as an economy. where we are as as a country, as an economy. can't just an economy. we can't just conjure money up out of nowhere .

conjure money up out of nowhere. it's incredible. and the thing that we do though, madeleine, we do, you know, we conjured up billions of pounds of billions of pounds out of nowhere during the covid panic. yeah. and look what happened to the that. not the economy after that. it's not sustainable . you know, borrowing sustainable. you know, borrowing rates you do that. rates go up when you do that. >> and that was a one off expenditure wasn't it. >> it was a it was a one off. it wasn't annual. >> it was a it was a one off. it wasn't an able to we were able to >> we're able to we were able to find money of pounds of find money billions of pounds of money when comes to things money when it comes to things like the banks as like bailing out the banks as we did 16 years found billions did 16 years ago, found billions upon billions to do that. whenever the new whenever there's the next new military escapade, it's military escapade, whether it's invading or we suddenly invading iraq or we suddenly find hundreds of billions down the back of the sofa. um, you know, the covid pandemic, as i say. and yet when it comes to really, really important things like, you know, protecting and funding properly in the national health service paying decent health service and paying decent wages people working in those wages to people working in those services, go , no, services, we suddenly go, no, no, we've got to retrench. money's tight, we can't afford that. and you know, people understand that a real understand that there's a real contradiction that we can find money it suits but can't

money when it suits but can't when it doesn't suit. >> well, mean , can we always >> well, i mean, can we always and also the fact is that politicians make terrible decisions they often decisions with money. they often do. agree, but do. i would agree, but ultimately, the money that pays for wages of anyone in the for the wages of anyone in the pubuc for the wages of anyone in the public sector comes from people in the private sector who are also suffering and nowhere also suffering and have nowhere near the level of generosity in their pension arrangements . it's their pension arrangements. it's that doctors would have . that junior doctors would have. so really the, the so i think really the, the burnout and churn is, is very real. and i'm perhaps they should be paid more to try to enfice should be paid more to try to entice more people. >> do you think any of this is political, paul? >> well, i mean, yeah , i think >> well, i mean, yeah, i think it's political. um, but then again, i think this could be the new normal in a way, because labour saying that they labour are saying that they wouldn't the 35% wouldn't agree to the 35% ehhen wouldn't agree to the 35% either. we find that either. so we might find that even end up with labour even if we end up with a labour government later year, that government later this year, that these become these strikes would become a feature life. and other feature of life. and the other thing is also that we've had so many last few many strikes in the last few years, but before that, it wasn't really such an aspect of daily as daily life. that was as noticeable disruptive. noticeable and as disruptive. and think perhaps because

and i think perhaps because there was so much industrial action the 70s, and our action in the 70s, and our politicians have actually not had kind of experience of had that kind of experience of how talk and how to even talk to and negotiate properly, you know, that they've lost muscle that they've lost that muscle memory and now they're a bit stuck. i think stuck. and i think that's probably of political probably true of the political class in general. >> what do think to it at home? >> i do confess, i do think that junior doctors should be paid more, how much i guess more, but how much more? i guess that million dollar that is the million dollar question. david says my opinion of all time of doctors is at an all time low. are breaking their low. they are breaking their oath walking out on oath by just walking out on their simply for money. their patients simply for money. oh, david, you're not messing around. is that a view that's shared by anyone else at home? lisa les says, what about the rest of us? are we not suffering with reductions well? the with pay reductions as well? the junior doctors are junior doctors strikes are contributing now waiting contributing now to the waiting lists, keith says. if lists, keith says. maybe if doctors work the hours they were supposed to, then the waiting list wouldn't be quite long, list wouldn't be quite so long, paul says. give doctors the 35% they're asking for, but make them work for the nhs them sign to work for the nhs for minimum of ten years from for a minimum of ten years from the date of signing. what would you make to that suggestion?

look after the break. speaking of who's paying what of money and who's paying what rishi sunaks is out. rishi sunaks tax return is out. have you seen it? half £1 million over actually is what he paid in tax last year. million over actually is what he paid in tax last year . there's paid in tax last year. there's many people absolutely furious saying that he's out of touch. is he or not? i'll see you in two.

hi there. this is dewbs& co with me. michelle dewberry 617, the sketch writer and columnist at the daily telegraph madeleine grounds is alongside me, as is the and the trade unionist and broadcaster embery . it's broadcaster paul embery. it's friday, about quarter friday, it's about quarter seven. it's my favourite time of the show. last week. jubilee tavern is open. cheers everyone. cheers to you, cheers to you and cheers to you and cheers to all of you at home. um, let's talk tax, shall we? rishi sunak everyone, are you sitting down? are you sitting down? because his tax return is out? and get this, everybody eye—watering. some some people might say, long

story short, he earned more than £2 million in the last tax year , £2 million in the last tax year, and he paid over half £1 million in tax . many people are livid in tax. many people are livid about these sums of money. uh, they're basically saying it shows that is massively out of touch. shows that is massively out of touch . madeline, where are you touch. madeline, where are you on all this? >> well, i mean, i think that we i'm quite wary of creating a pubuc i'm quite wary of creating a public debate in which we pay such close attention to the private lives , um, wealth, private lives, um, wealth, family wealth, etc. of our politicians. i mean , ultimately politicians. i mean, ultimately i'm more concerned about are they capable, are they good at their job? and they capable, are they good at theirjob? and i wouldn't they capable, are they good at their job? and i wouldn't want to. there's already been i've noficed to. there's already been i've noticed this topic comes up a lot more in politics. labour have pushing hard it. have been pushing hard on it. um, they about often. they um, they talk about often. they bnng um, they talk about often. they bring for example, rishi bring up, for example, rishi sunak's and her family sunak's wife and her family wealth at pmqs. and i don't really like that. they used to be a bit of kind of be a bit of a kind of understanding that you don't bnng understanding that you don't bring people's families into it. i'm are they

i'm most interested in are they good their job? um, i'm most interested in are they good theirjob? um, i don't good at theirjob? um, i don't think we should want to deter people who have had a, you know, probably earned a lot of money in to have in their previous career to have got of investments. mean, got lots of investments. i mean, i they're good at their i care if they're good at their job and, and, um, delivering what, promise. think what, what they promise. i think that's rishi sunak ought to that's how rishi sunak ought to be judged rather than this poor liam broady. well we've got his tax desk here. tax return on the desk here. >> do. and you want to see >> we do. and you want to see how scribbling was done on how much scribbling was done on it? >> i was going to say, michelle, at first thought was yours, at first i thought it was yours, but realised were few. >> it's too low. it's too low. if that was mine, it'd be. i want it ten times bigger. >> obviously. um, i think he earned 15 times more through investments did as prime investments than he did as prime minister think gets minister i think he gets £139,000 for prime minister. what's that? well, what's wrong with that? well, i'm say is what that i'm going to say is what that tells me is how we what that shows is how we reward. if you like , unearned wealth, rather like, unearned wealth, rather than actual work, you know, i just i just think in principle it's an indictment of a society that says, you know, someone as

a prime minister working as hard as he does, even though i don't agree with him on a lot of stuff, working as hard he stuff, working as hard as he does gets £139,000. but can earn 15 that essentially play 15 times that essentially play in markets or getting in the markets with or getting people on. >> anyone anyone can make >> anyone can. anyone can make investments. well investments. paul yeah, but well all fine. >> i'm not saying he >> and i'm not saying he shouldn't be entitled that shouldn't be entitled to that money, but i think there is an argument to say that that kind of unearned if like, of unearned wealth, if you like, should least, we should be at the very least, we should be at the very least, we should equalise capital gains tax income tax rates. i tax with income tax rates. i think a no brainer. um, think that is a no brainer. um, and that's something when and that's something that when you figures like that, you look at figures like that, you look at figures like that, you how a measure like you see how a measure like that would justified . would be completely justified. >> do you agree with that? >> do you agree with that? >> well , i >> do you agree with that? >> well, i mean, think that's >> well, i mean, i think that's kind a separate debate. kind of a separate debate. i mean , what's your answer in mean, what's your answer in principle, though , should principle, though, should capital gains be taxed on a similar to income? similar level to income? >> i that's reasonable, >> i think that's reasonable, yes, because i think we income tax is too high. >> and particularly penalises people who are starting out who rely solely on that. >> so where's the risk factor then? you too, because the whole point is when do time money point is when you do time money

exchange you go to work and exchange i.e. you go to work and you salary, there's you get a salary, there's absolutely risk whatsoever. you get a salary, there's abs we stimulate in a certain part of the economy, aren't we? we're obsessed in this country with financial services and our economic policy for 40 years or more geared towards the more has been geared towards the demands financial services. demands of financial services. and what that's done is it means we have completely neglected our industrial base . it means we're industrial base. it means we're completely neglected our manufacture in base. we've all you know, with the big bang in the 80s, people didn't invest in and all of the money flooded into london and post—industrial britain and small town britain, which thrived on manufacturing and was was thrown under the bus essentially. and we've played a huge economic and social price for that. i think it's possible to think that, you know, we need to think that, you know, we need to reprioritize these, um,

manufacturing . manufacturing. >> i think actually more politicians are coming around to this idea when they that this idea when they see that actually more, um, actually in a more, um, dysfunction world, you can no longer rely on the same kind of supply chain. >> anyway, look, can >> well, anyway, look, you can have final on that. let have the final say on that. let me you this. do you think we me ask you this. do you think we even need to see his tax return? what's it got to do with us? if you into public office and you go into public office and then of a sudden, what then now all of a sudden, what all of your income outside of pubuc is all of your income outside of public is fair game? public office is fair game? really? are we to really? are we going to encourage brightest encourage the best, brightest brains public service brains into the public service in country with that in this country with that attitude or not? do you think attitude or not? or do you think actually end too much money, actually you end too much money, get you're out of get in the bin, you're out of touch everybody else? uh, touch with everybody else? uh, john says, why are you talking about how much premier league footballers there? michelle? that's for another day. paul embery madeline embery thank you, madeline grant. have grant. thank you. have a fantastic, um, evening and weekend will see you on weekend and i will see you on monday night. >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar sponsors of weather on . gb

solar sponsors of weather on. gb news evening. >> i'm alex deakin and this is your latest weather update from the met office for gb news a mixed picture this weekend. most of us will see some sunshine, but there will also be some showers and there's some showers and there's still some snow over northern snow falling over northern scotland. pressure continues scotland. low pressure continues to our weather. it's to dominate our weather. it's slowly pushing milder air further north, but still cold enough across northern scotland for some sleet and snow. there's a met office warning in place here. not huge amounts at low levels, but certainly some of the higher routes fairly nasty for travelling on overnight with gusty extra hazard , gusty winds and extra hazard, meaning blowing meaning that snow is blowing around. southern around. rain for southern scotland. ireland scotland. northern ireland turning for much of turning drier for much of england wales could turn england and wales could turn a bit not turning to cold. bit misty, not turning to cold. saturday looks like dry and saturday then looks like dry and bright for a good chunk of england and wales. there'll be some it should some sunshine here. it should brighten through southern brighten up through southern scotland northern scotland and across northern ireland to the far north of scotland, there always staying wet, snow becoming wet, although the snow becoming increasingly to the increasingly confined to the tops of the mountains, then showers coming in the showers coming in during the afternoon wales and

afternoon across wales and southwest england. temperatures was on the high side for the time of year in the south double digits, 13, with a bit of digits, maybe 13, with a bit of sunshine and slowly turning milder scotland as well. milder across scotland as well. sunday a lot of cloud, sunday promises a lot of cloud, even some fog. early on that could be slow to clear. there'll be a sprinkling of showers over central and southern england and northwest england and western scotland too, some sunny scotland too, but some sunny spells also likely. temperatures close to average for the time of year six sevenths across the year six and sevenths across the north, 10 or 11 further south. goodbye looks like things are heating up . heating up. >> boxt boilers sponsors of weather on gb news

i >> -- >> well .

welcome to lee anderson's real world. >> and tonight on the show we've got the former ceo of energy uk. that's angela knight . he's been that's angela knight. he's been let out the corner again. got matthew laza former labour party adviser is back on the show . adviser is back on the show. matthew will be facing off against a second appearance from benedict spence. we'll also go back in the day with 100 year old d—day veteran william james gladden and for last orders we're joined by towie starjames argent. but first let's go to the . news the. news >> good evening. from the gb newsroom. it'sjust >> good evening. from the gb newsroom. it's just gone. 7:00 the headlines this hour. it's now believed that chemical attacker abdul ezedi is most likely to have died. and police say his body may never be found. in a briefing at scotland yard, police said their main working