he broke and conservatives when he broke with convention to allow a vote on a rival labour motion for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire . the tory and snp mps walked out of the chamber over the speaker's decision. labour's amendment went through without a formal vote and there was no formal vote and there was no formal vote and there was no formal vote on the snp's motion, which was meant to be the focus of the day. well tonight there's pressure on sir lindsay hoyle and whether or not he can keep his job. with the motion of no confidence mounted him, his job. with the motion of no confid hase mounted him, his job. with the motion of no confid has gained ed him, his job. with the motion of no confid has gained ed support|im, his job. with the motion of no confid has gained ed support of, which has gained the support of over 30 from following the over 30 mps from following the uproar, sir lindsay tried to apologise to the house. >> i am and i regret with the deepness. >> i am and i regret with the deepness . with my sadness that deepness. with my sadness that it's ended up on like that in this position . that was never my this position. that was never my intention for it to end up like this. i was absolutely, absolutely convinced that the decision was done with the right

intention . and i recognise and intention. and i recognise and i recognise the strength of feeling of members on this issue. sir lindsay hoyle, now the home secretary , has the home secretary, has apologised to the family of a baby whose birth certificate was allegedly returned to the parents with the word israel as the place of birth defaced . the place of birth defaced. >> james cleverly has ordered an urgent review of the claims and confirm the department's commercial partner has suspended staff members . posting on x, mr staff members. posting on x, mr cleverly said the matter was totally unacceptable and he said we will not tolerate anti—semitism and the king is back at work. meeting face to face with the prime minister, rishi sunak , for the first time rishi sunak, for the first time since being diagnosed with cancen since being diagnosed with cancer. king charles met mr sunak at buckingham palace today, marking . the restart of today, marking. the restart of their weekly encounters to discuss matters of state. speaking to mr sunak, the king said he'd been reduced to tears by the many wonderful messages

and cards he'd received since his diagnosis and beforehand the monarch held an in—person privy council meeting at the royal residence, and it's the first time the 75 year old king has been filmed carrying out his official duties since his cancer diagnosis . for the very latest diagnosis. for the very latest news stories, sign up to gb news alerts. scan the qr code on the screen or go to gb news. com slash alerts . slash alerts. >> hello and welcome to headunes >> hello and welcome to headlines , your first look at headlines, your first look at thursday's newspapers . thursday's newspapers. >> i'm andrew doyle and joining me tonight is the thinking man's crumpet and the crumpet josh howie and the crumpet josh howie and the crumpet man's thinkor. >> cressida wetton . doesn't make >> cressida wetton. doesn't make any sense does it.7 >> what's a crumpet man.7 a >> what's a crumpet man? a baken >> what's a crumpet man? a baker, i guess. i don't know . baker, i guess. i don't know. >> well, just take a look. >> well, just take a look. >> you've some after >> well, just take a look. >> yjuste some after >> well, just take a look. >> yjust be some after >> well, just take a look. >> yjust be happy; after >> well, just take a look. >> it'sst be happy; after >> well, just take a look. >> it'sjust happy.3 after >> well, just take a look. >> it's just take py.3 after >> well, just take a look. >> it's just take the after compliment. >> you don't need understand >> you don't need to understand what the compliment means. josh,

you're looking very scottish. >> yes >> thank you. yes >> thank you. yes >> i stole this tie from the. >> i stole this tie from the. >> from the dressing room. oh is that right? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> you're confessing to theft, but cultural appropriation. but also cultural appropriation. >> could could get an >> it could be. i could get an angry hr . angry email from hr. >> you will. one of the morning hosts as he stole my time. >> highly unlikely. >> highly unlikely. >> be sorry. oh, look, it's got a close up shot there of my gut. thank you so much, cameraman. >> tie is. >> i wonder whose tie it is. probably that guy, angus macdougall probably that guy, angus macdou who does the 6 to 9? >> yes. who does the 6 to 9? >> yes. who does the 6 to 9? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> guy. >> that guy. >> that guy. >> anyway . uh, right. >> okay. anyway. uh, right. let's have a look at those front pages for thursday. the daily mail is leading with bosses. must allow make allowances for menopausal . menopausal women. >> the telegraph is leading with speaker on brink after walkout . speaker on brink after walkout. >> the guardian also has that story . story. >> the fury in commons forces speaker to apologise gaza speaker to apologise over gaza vote chaos. the times respect the menopause or be sued, firms told and the i news also goes with the house of commons story and finally, the sun king's tears .

tears. >> and those were your front pages. >> and those were your front pages . right pages. right >> well, most of the front pages on thursday are being dominated by a single story. >> and josh, you've got the details from the guardian. yeah. >> commons >> fury and commons forces speaker apologise gaza. speaker to apologise over gaza. >> vote chaos. as the snp put forward a motion to ask for a ceasefire or demand a ceasefire. yes, in in gaza and because that will obviously work and, uh, the wording was maybe slightly too harsh. uh, so keir starmer a new motion forward also asking for ceasefire, but the gist of it was that under certain conditions, i.e. i.e. that, uh, hamas won't send any more missiles into israel and b any more danger. so essentially saying , yeah, we want a saying, yeah, we want a ceasefire. once hamas have been destroyed. >> so the snp, the snp's motion was broadly in alignment with the labour party's motion. but there were some details that were different and this would

have put labour mps in a difficult position had they been asked vote on. asked to vote on. >> that's it. >> well that's it. >> well that's it. >> the speaker broke with >> so the speaker broke with convention forward the convention and put forward the labour motion instead of the snp one. yes. and people were very angry. if it had just been the snp one, what would have happened was they're saying ioo happened was they're saying 100 labour would have labour mps would have would have voted for it against, uh, the whips wishes . whips wishes. >> and of course, the upshot of thatis >> and of course, the upshot of that is because lindsay hoyle, the speaker, is of the labour party, it looks and smells a bit like collusion. >> what do you think? >> what do you think? >> a bit. yeah. i mean , >> just a bit. yeah. i mean, that's exactly what looks that's exactly what it looks like. exactly and don't know like. exactly and i don't know whether will the whether this will impress the sort palestine sort of average palestine supporter or not. because really starmer's uh, starmer's ceasefire now, so long as hamas are no longer threatening violence against israel, it's almost not worth having. >> well, you know , you know, >> well, you know, you know, nothing against the snp or laboun nothing against the snp or labour, i doubt very much labour, but i doubt very much a full day debate in the house full day of debate in the house of over this issue is of commons over this issue is going make bit difference. >> mean, how stuff >> i mean, how much stuff has this country to on with, this country got to get on with, right? have number right? we have a limited number of yes. one

of days per year. yes. and one of days per year. yes. and one of them's just been wasted on this. what whatever of them's just been wasted on this. get what whatever of them's just been wasted on this. get forward whatever of them's just been wasted on this. get forward byatever motions get put forward by whichever party, by whichever political party, by any makes absolute no any wording makes absolute no difference on the ground, which kind of means that the chaos that the house of that we saw in the house of commons today is meaningless precedent. >> was chaotic. precedent. >> i was chaotic. precedent. >> i wa�* sawaotic. precedent. >> i wa�*saw some of the >> i mean, i saw some of the footage people of footage of people sort of shouting about. shouting and storming about. i mean, know that it's a bit of mean, i know that it's a bit of a the best of times, a circus at the best of times, but even by the usual but really, even by the usual standards, yes. >> yeah, it was very, very boisterous, wasn't it? yeah. people clearly very angry. um, and for the speaker and now calling for the speaker to leave, they're saying that they don't want him anymore. >> i mean, it's a perennial problem, isn't it? because the speaker's be from one speaker's got to be from one party we've party or the other. we've had this bercow the this with john bercow in the past accused of past who was accused of partisanship came to the partisanship when it came to the brexit similarly, brexit vote. and similarly, lindsay in lindsay hoyle is in that in hot water a similar water for a similar reason. >> apologised. so, you >> he's apologised. so, you know, maybe we on deal know, maybe we move on and deal with in country , with issues in this country, what things that can actually what things that we can actually do maybe, maybe. >> right. maybe. >> well ght. crossed for that >> well fingers crossed for that one. let's move on now. cressida >> well fingers crossed for that onthe at's move on now. cressida >> well fingers crossed for that onthe dailyiove on now. cressida >> well fingers crossed for that onthe daily mail>n now. cressida >> well fingers crossed for that onthe daily mail oi'iiow. cressida >> well fingers crossed for that onthe daily mail on thursday. da to the daily mail on thursday. what they leading with? okay. >> bosses must make allowances for menopausal women . um, so

for menopausal women. um, so this, uh, this story is saying that bosses have been warned they breach at risk breaching equality laws unless they allow menopausal women to wear cooler uniforms and work from home on hot days. now i'm not an expert on the menopause, but i was on the understanding that employers already do make allowances for women. well, you would think, wouldn't you? i don't know, um, they're calling just them. >> well, they were in the good old days. >> that >> yeah, that was what they would done. >> yeah, that was what they wotthose done. >> yeah, that was what they wotthose dithe you know, >> those are the good. you know, i'm feminist. i'm not a feminist. >> entirely sweating. >> i'm not entirely sweating. >> i'm not entirely sweating. >> well well, >> get out, get out. well well, this is very nice. >> um , and, but doesn't >> um, and, uh, but it doesn't get around embarrassment, does it? no which i personally think would be would still be a problem . um, the other story problem. um, the other story they've got on the mail they've got on the daily mail is, uh, it's a story from a woman. but woman. it says i'm asexual but longed why at longed for a baby. that's why at 24, spent £6,000 on a spum 24, i spent £6,000 on a spum donor. 24, i spent £6,000 on a spum donor . so it's really a 24, i spent £6,000 on a spum donor. so it's really a woman's world, isn't it? now, there's a lot of, um. wouldn't you say it's another woman's issue? >> well, she's. so she's part of the lgbt q plus community. >> she's . is the lgbt q plus community. >> she's. is that right?

>> she's. is that right? >> yeah. she asexual. they >> she's. is that right? >> considered asexual. they >> she's. is that right? >> considered queerual. they >> she's. is that right? >> considered queer underley >> she's. is that right? >> considered queer under the terminology. >> that's so ridiculous . >> that's so ridiculous. >> that's so ridiculous. >> i know it's so i'm getting at is the overall we're in we've kind of won now haven't we. you know like yes . lots of know like yes. lots of accommodations made. well accommodations being made. well done know there have been >> you know there have been when we about lgbtqia, i mean, we talk about lgbtqia, i mean, there have centuries there have been centuries of genuine against gay genuine oppression against gay people, being burnt people, people being burnt at the for gay, the stake for being gay, tormented, all the rest tormented, beaten all the rest of it. >> one's ever e one's ever done of it. >> one's ever done that e one's ever done that to >> no one's ever done that to someone got a libido someone who's got a low libido right not right? asexuals are not oppressed. want oppressed. they just don't want to and no one cares. to have sex and no one cares. >> but you. >> but you. >> no one cares. >> yeah, no one cares. >> still had a pipette . >> you still had a pipette. >> you still had a pipette. >> her pet. >> she's still got her pet. >> she's still got her pet. >> does it? oh, >> exactly. does it? oh, a pipette. okay, so, pipette, i thought you've been dismissive about the idea of child. about the idea of a child. >> oh, meant, little >> oh, no, i meant, uh, little willy . i >> oh, no, i meant, uh, little willy. i really not want >> oh, no, i meant, uh, little willy . i really not want to willy. i really do not want to elaborate on this. josh, sorry. you've gone into very dark place. >> amazing . >> amazing. >> amazing. >> it's the thai that's doing angus influence on you. >> let's move to this next >> let's move on to this next one. the times . one. this is the times. >> yes. >> yes. >> josh, what are the times leading with there similar leading with there being similar stories, very stories, but they've got a very interesting stories, but they've got a very inte bottom. the bottom. >> all's well when pupils act

out shakespeare. evidence now out shakespeare. so evidence now proves that it that shakespeare does improve emotional development and children's literacy. but the trick is they have to actually act it out . so have to actually act it out. so when they actually get physical with the language and, and, um, it embeds it and it really makes a difference. but i think that the argument has always been within lots of lessons, not just in english, but that's how kids learn shakespeare way is full of physical things , isn't it? physical things, isn't it? >> uh, stabbing. yes stabbing. and good fun stuff like that. which is round the cauldron. i remember doing macbeth at school as a kid and being fascinated by all i shakespeare all that. so i think shakespeare is vehicle for this. is a good vehicle for this. >> been saying this for >> i've been saying this for ages. that ages. i do worry that shakespeare being shakespeare is sort of being pulled schooling pulled out of various schooling systems, white. systems, very white. >> they think he's a dead white man, which exactly man, white guy, which is exactly what man, white guy, which is exactly thof course , maybe. >> of course, maybe. >> of course, maybe. >> that someone's going to >> but that someone's going to reinvent clearly. reinvent him. oh, no. clearly. >> clearly. course he'll be. >> clearly. of course he'll be. >> clearly. of course he'll be. >> he'll be reclaimed or they'll do a biopic him he'll do a biopic of him where he'll be disabled black be sort of a disabled black woman something. woman or something. >> of it is that >> but the point of it is that

you're absolutely right. you do have get kids to act it out have to get kids to act it out so language, mean, have to get kids to act it out so language nguage, mean, have to get kids to act it out so language is uage, mean, have to get kids to act it out so language is note, mean, have to get kids to act it out so language is not a mean, have to get kids to act it out so language is not a million the language is not a million miles away us. the language is not a million milit's|way us. the language is not a million milit's not us. the language is not a million milit's not like us. the language is not a million milit's not like chaucer, it's >> it's not like chaucer, it's not middle english. is. not middle english. it is. >> relatively modern. not middle english. it is. >> so latively modern. not middle english. it is. >> so you ely modern. not middle english. it is. >> so you cannodern. not middle english. it is. >> so you can understand it right. so you can understand it if loud and if you hear it out loud and i get a bit these ideas. get a bit sick of these ideas. >> a good teacher as >> i needed a good teacher as well, perfectly well, to be perfectly honest. i had teacher. yeah. had a good teacher. right? yeah. but i think you shouldn't. >> is the most >> i mean, he is the most important the english important writer in the english language, sure language, so let's make sure kids him at an kids are exposed to him at an early age. >> right? early age. >> should a no brainer. >> should be a no brainer. >> should be a no brainer. >> because what it >> absolutely. because what it for my of learning for me, my memories of learning shakespeare was it pushes you into what language can do . yes. into what language can do. yes. which and you had to make those connections and go with it. yeah. and i could literally i remember my brain expanding. it didn't expand much , but it didn't expand much, but it definitely there was some growth. so there you go. >> teachers if you're watching get shakespeare out. get kids to act shakespeare out. although the titus although not the end of titus andronicus because you'll get sacked. >> someone's clever you are josh. >> you are. >> you are. >> no i'm not. i don't know what the ending of titus. and i'm googung the ending of titus. and i'm googling a lot beginning and a little bit of cannibalism . little bit of cannibalism. >> um. >> um. >> oh, exciting. well, there

would one then, would be a good one then, wouldn't takes kids. wouldn't it? takes kids. >> okay. wouldn't it? takes kids. >> right. we're going end >> right. we're going to end this looking the this section by looking at the front of sun. front cover of the sun. >> cressida, you've got this. okay >> king's tears. well—wishers have the have made me cry. so, yeah, the king moved to tears by king has been moved to tears by all the attention, all all the. all the attention, all the kindness, outpouring all the. all the attention, all th i mean, did you write him a letter, chris, though? >> of course. yeah i haven't written to him yet. they made actually bosses here actually all the bosses here because news. because it's gb news. >> we had write a letter >> we all had to write a letter in like, do you remember? >> we all had to write a letter in you like, do you remember? >> we all had to write a letter in you got> we all had to write a letter in you got it do you remember? >> we all had to write a letter in you got it for you remember? >> we all had to write a letter in you got it for me, remember? >> we all had to write a letter in you got it for me, iemember? >> we all had to write a letter in you got it for me, i was�*nber? do you got it for me, i was there, yeah, yeah. got it from hr. the talk the bosses. >> josh, people watching this will believe that that's real. you will. you know, they will. >> they will. >> you know they will. >> you know they will. >> real. >> it's real. >> it's real. >> don't don't listen. >> don't don't listen. >> look forward to that in the metro look, are >> well, look, those are the front covers. >> well, look, those are the front co cover. >> well, look, those are the front cocover. uh, but coming up, >> uh, cover. uh, but coming up, we're to be talking about we're going to be talking about the death of protest, the deep state and boris versus tucker carlson . carlson. >> don't go

>> you're listening to gb news radio .

radio. >> welcome back to headliners, your first look at thursday's newspapers . i'm andrew doyle newspapers. i'm andrew doyle with token white male josh howie and yet another woman , cressida and yet another woman, cressida wetton. josh let's kick off with thursday's i news and labour mps face their worst enemy. labour voters . voters. >> yes, i know you don't want to mess with them. labour mps concerned for their own safety ahead of crunch gaza vote. so this obviously actually the this is obviously actually the votes yes and it votes now happened. yes and it went through unanimously. but but uh, this is a, a uh, worrisome story because you really shouldn't have our elected representatives being fearful of the general public, which is what's happening here with the pro—palestinian , uh, with the pro—palestinian, uh, activists. and there's been a lot of incidents, including mike freer , who's now stepping down freer, who's now stepping down for suspected arson of his offices. but not just that , uh, offices. but not just that, uh, a london borough council recently had to be evacuated after pro—palestine protesters .

after pro—palestine protesters. uh, these are not healthy signs of a of a healthy democracy. uh, there's a new labour mp. uh for kingswood. it turns out his husband used to is israeli or was born in israel. and had served in the idf a couple of decades ago. they've been offered extra security after receiving all of receiving threats. so all of this together further, um, is , this together further, um, is, uh, as i said , um, i wouldn't uh, as i said, um, i wouldn't say necessarily scared. well, they're saying it's scared. they're scared, but it's also the impact that you're going to have on their votes because what one labour mp is how, um, one labour mp says is how, um, this sort of she talks about or he talks about a coordinator harassment make harassment of colleagues make them very concerned how things escalate and then talks about the vote and says, i won't be voting a certain way and voting in a certain way and links those two together. it's like, you that like, well, are you saying that you're vote you're not going to vote for that because this that because because of this influence, scary , isn't it? >> precedent. we've had this before , you know. i mean, it's before, you know. i mean, it's a bit fine line, isn't there? bit of a fine line, isn't there? i've heard politicians complaining, unjust, you know, people jeering at them on the street or , you

street or something, or, you know, nasty things know, saying nasty things online. well, we all get that, don't we? and if you're in a position political position of political power, you're protest you're going to get protest orders making around orders making a noise around you. is a distinction you. but there is a distinction between threats and between that and threats and harassment , between that and threats and harassment, where people are afraid to actually vote the way they and of they want to vote. and of course, important, course, it's quite important, isn't it, for a democracy that, for the surgery for instance, the surgery system works and see your works so you can go and see your politician, needs politician, your mp needs to be accessible. this kind accessible. but with this kind of thing, that's not going to happen, it? well no, it's i happen, is it? well no, it's i mean, practically mean, it's practically over, isn't want to be mp >> i wouldn't want to be an mp now. and it's great that they're offering more protection, but it's , is mean, it's not enough, is it? i mean, it's not enough, is it? i mean, it's it's already gone too it's like it's already gone too far. at this point far. you know, at this point when the decision far. you know, at this point wibecome the decision far. you know, at this point wibecome an the decision far. you know, at this point wibecome an mp, the decision far. you know, at this point wibecome an mp, th alreadyon to become an mp, you already know that this is it's paralysing, i think. and as you said, we need to be able to go and see our gp or gps. that would be nice for our mps. we need to surgeries and if need to have surgeries and if that's i mean, that's not possible, i mean, it's really we're always hearing this phrase, it's threat this phrase, it's a threat to democracy. really a democracy. this really is a threat. >> p- f- threat. >> is this happening, >> so why is this happening, josh? know, it's josh? because you know, it's because josh? because you know, it's becwell, we're talking about >> well, we're talking about a specific group of protesters

here, aren't we, don't here, aren't we, who don't seem to of to think that, uh, threats of violence a problem because violence are a problem because they this. yeah. know, violence are a problem because the left this. yeah. know, violence are a problem because the left cranks yeah. know, violence are a problem because the left cranks yea islamists)w, violence are a problem because the left cranks yea islamists ,v, far left cranks and islamists, uh, who are predominantly making up pro—palestine movement. up the pro—palestine movement. uh they were out today in front of parliament. they they egged one of presenters. uh, one of our presenters. uh, martin martin daubney. um, they also patrick christie's was interviewing some of them, and they were coming out with they were just coming out with blatant conspiracy blatant anti—semitic conspiracy theories israel controls theories that israel controls theories that israel controls the ridiculous stuff i >> -- >> so why is hum >> so why is this? >> so why is this? >> why has it happened particularly on the far left? why there idea that why is there is this idea that they are so self—righteous that they are so self—righteous that they people, commit they can threaten people, commit acts of violence? they can threaten people, commit actzbecause nce? they can threaten people, commit actzbecause i've’ they can threaten people, commit actzbecause i've read working >> because i've read a working that about hypocrisy that talked about the hypocrisy of left and how they of the far left and how they then become fascists . well, then become the fascists. well, if write a book, if someone should write a book, someone should, shouldn't they? yeah i'm going it. i'm yeah i'm going to do it. i'm going call it. are you? going to call it. are you? >> i've got something you could read ideas. read first. give you some ideas. very stuff. very depressing stuff. >> we're going move on >> okay, we're going to move on now to the telegraph now anyway. to the telegraph next. cressida are we going to have to start protesting about protests? yes >> uh, the court ruling that

could stop eco protesters escaping punishment. um, so apparently this was today, although i haven't been able to get an update on it on google heanng get an update on it on google hearing at the of appeal hearing at the court of appeal may the future of civil may define the future of civil disobedience . as a string of disobedience. as a string of climate activists trials reached the so know what the court. so we know what they're up just to boil, uh, they're up to. just to boil, uh, lying in the road, stopping you, getting work, stopping getting to work, stopping people, hospitals people, getting to hospitals, hospital appointments, all that bad . um, so historically, bad stuff. um, so historically, there's been this defence and there's been this defence and the example they're given here is that, uh, if somebody's got a dog trapped in a hot car, you'd break the window. and that break the window. and at that point, breaking that window isn't illegal. you'd love that, wouldn't you? >> to say if the glass, if they don't out, if they haven't don't watch out, if they haven't with let's away grateful. >> and don't worry about. it's a chihuahua . it's a very small dog chihuahua. it's a very small dog in example. anyway um, in this example. anyway um, that's the climate that's been used by the climate activists. they've sort of said things like, know, things like, you know, well, well, example well, there's an example where they at, um, they broke the window at, um, i want say it was a bank. it want to say it was a bank. it was a hsbc caused 500 grand's worth of damage. and they said, oh, but the bank oh, yes, but if the bank understood the threat, that's

really happening they'd really happening to them, they'd supported really happening to them, they'd suptherei are . demanding >> there they are. demanding that we accept the premise of their argument and the premise of their argument that of their argument is that the world is on the verge of collapse. it's going to explode any most people, any second. and most people, including subject any second. and most people, includiri subject any second. and most people, includiri not, subject any second. and most people, includiri not, don't subject any second. and most people, includiri not, don't agreect , which i am not, don't agree with that. >> yes, but the problem is juries do enough to let them off. so of course, the irony of destroying all of that window making glass is a very sort of energy intensive process. yes. so to make these huge windows again would have actually bring us that closer to death . us that closer to death. >> goodness me. i mean, the idea that there's a degree of hypocrisy movement, no. hypocrisy in this movement, no. >> madness. uh, so , >> unbelievable madness. uh, so, so but course , as in all of so but of course, as in all of these similar types of cases, these similar types of cases, the danger is that by closing what is seen as a loophole for by some actually will limit our own, um, freedoms and liberties because it could be used for valid protests . valid protests. >> i mean, it's tricky, isn't it? i'm a great believer in peaceful protest, irrespective of the cause. you know, i think

if agree, doesn't of the cause. you know, i think if everyone doesn't of the cause. you know, i think if everyone should't of the cause. you know, i think if everyone should be able matter. everyone should be able to peacefully. to protest peacefully. but i think cross line think once they cross that line into and into criminality, and particularly when they're vandalising , that vandalising works of art, that that the end of that for me is the end of it. i don't hsbc, i don't don't think the hsbc, i don't think it's that great. >> it a beautiful piece. oh, >> it was a beautiful piece. oh, really? you just didn't understand really? you just didn't understéokay, actually very >> josh okay, actually very moving, conceptual piece. moving, modern conceptual piece. >> study enough. >> i didn't study enough. shakespeare. problem. shakespeare. that's my problem. that was your problem. >> read titus andronicus. >> read titus andronicus. >> i get a lot about >> i will get to a lot about banks windows. >> i will get to a lot about barokay. windows. >> i will get to a lot about barokay. wiright.. >> i will get to a lot about barokay. wi right. we're >> okay. all right. we're going to on to the mirror now. to move on to the mirror now. uh, i've heard uh, josh? liz truss, i've heard of yes of her. yes >> she , uh, she was prime >> um, she, uh, she was prime minister >> josh. >> josh. >> prime minister. yes, yes, prime minister. okay she blames the deep state for sabotaging her 49 days as pm. uh, in, uh, fox news tirade. okay. uh what tirade? >> seems a bit strong . yeah, i >> seems a bit strong. yeah, i think she just wrote an article, didn't she? >> no, i think she's. and she's out america. she's of out in america. she's sort of selling guess , selling herself as a, i guess, to con, the big bucks. to the neo con, the big bucks. >> what she's doing cpac, isn't she? conference. can't she? the conference. but i can't imagine truss going a imagine liz truss going on a tirade. seems completely tirade. it just seems completely out of character. >> think mirror >> i think that's the mirror

giving of a bit, a bit giving it a bit of a bit, a bit of adding big old of a weather, adding a big old little to it. little word to it. >> there's actually two >> uh, there's actually two things here. she is things going on here. she is saying deep state was saying that the deep state was was sort of bought her down. uh, there is a counter argument that there is a counter argument that there is a counter argument that there is such a i mean, you can call it something insidious, like the deep state, but if you watch, like if you watch yes, minister or yes, prime minister, yes, conflict yes, there's a constant conflict between those two sides. and being good politician is being part a good politician is able is to work the system, able is how to work the system, game the system to get what you need. >> but that's not a deep state. no, that isn't what you're talking about. there is intransigent servants, intransigent civil servants, which and we which we've always had, and we have particularly now. >> argue that's >> well, i would argue that's probably but what probably what they had. but what she's she's sort of relaunching herself kind of herself as this kind of anti—woke person. yes which isn't her, her prime isn't really what her, her prime ministership was about at all. it was about economic policy . ministership was about at all. it was about economic policy. is what brought her down. >> yeah, but she's suggesting that the reason those economic reforms didn't work and that they spooked the markets was largely because even the right has become infected with this sort left woke politics.

sort of left wing woke politics. >> yeah, think i don't think >> yeah, i think i don't think that exactly that i think that's exactly what she's would she's saying. but what i would say left wing woke say is that left wing woke politics, discuss certain politics, as we discuss certain moves , its ideologies , it's not moves, its ideologies, it's not economic issues . moves, its ideologies, it's not economic issues. no. and that's what she was pushing here. so when she says cutting taxes, reducing the size of government, um, these i don't see as woke. >> those aren't common. those aren't popular with woke people, aren't popular with woke people, are they? because they lead to less services. >> i would say that are >> i would say that they are traditional choices traditional political choices as opposed to what we would discuss as the woke war or whatever , as the woke war or whatever, culture war or whatever. >> i mean, i suppose cressa did. what she's saying is it's odd, isn't that conservative isn't it, that as a conservative prime was to prime minister she was unable to enact conservative policies, and she's putting this down to this nebulous, state? nebulous, deep state? >> and i would agree with her that everything, you know, we've everything's that everything's shifted. so that well, we've been called well, we've always been called far aren't we? things far right, aren't we? things that far right at all are that aren't far right at all are being far right. being called far right. so things shifted such that if things have shifted such that if you're doing relatively traditional things, traditional conservative things, you are considered to be quite far ? yes, potentially. um, far right? yes, potentially. um, yeah.

>> okay. uh, right. well, let's move on now to the telegraph story about boris johnson getting a bit of a, uh, some money, apparently. >> well , no, money, apparently. >> well, no, he's not, uh, he's not getting some money. right. >> boris johnson denies demanding $1 million to be interviewed by tucker carlson . interviewed by tucker carlson. so obviously tucker's done so obviously tucker's just done his putin interview. uh, and bofis his putin interview. uh, and boris has criticised him for that publicly. um, and so they've been having a sort of onune they've been having a sort of online spat , they've been having a sort of online spat, if i don't know, in the public eye. uh, and so, so then the question is, who asked who ? well, it's very he said, who? well, it's very he said, she said yes. exactly. and so tuckeris she said yes. exactly. and so tucker is saying , she said yes. exactly. and so tucker is saying, oh my she said yes. exactly. and so tucker is saying , oh my god, he tucker is saying, oh my god, he asked for $1 million. who does he think is? is he that he think he is? is he that that's that's a that's a perfect that's a perfect what like . um, and perfect what he's like. um, and bofis perfect what he's like. um, and boris what a lot videos boris is what a lot of videos that accuracy forever. um, so bofisis that accuracy forever. um, so boris is saying no, not at all. uh, they offered they, you know, the team offered $1 million, and i said, it's got to go to ukrainian charities, not weapons charities for veterans. >> so basically each one is saying a completely different story don't do we? story. so we don't know, do we? >> know. you know, not

really. >> i like to think they're both telling and that telling the truth and that they're for telling they're both famous for telling they're both famous for telling the well. the truth as well. >> recollections vary, isn't it? >> m it? >> do we it? >> who do we believe? i'm. i mean, to put one mean, i wouldn't want to put one of down, but. of my colleagues down, but. >> i've met tucker carlson >> well, i've met tucker carlson , who nice and, uh, , who is very nice and, uh, i like sure. >> he's very nice. he, he's he's a supermarkets. a great tour of supermarkets. i don't anyone's seen don't know if anyone's seen that. very funny. have you seen the. very funny. he's in moscow. moscow? he's going around the supermarket. he's like, oh, they've got you put a coin in they've got you put a coin in the trolley. and i have. >> and i haven't seen that one. >> and i haven't seen that one. >> look at this. they've got like four cheeses. moscow is amazing. go putin. that's what it the it seems like. essentially the video, silly story. video, a bit of a silly story. >> it like one those >> it seems like one of those spats just a news spats that is just become a news story because who it is. >> maybe. but i think it's a shame interviewing shame he's not interviewing boris. i'd boris. that's an interview i'd like to see like to watch. i'd like to see tucker's child charm. and tucker's child like charm. and how make the two of how does that make the two of them together? >> would happen? two >> well, what would happen? two charismatic >> well, what would happen? two chaand atic have completely >> and they have a completely different view of this particular. well, exactly. so it would be interesting. yeah. okay. scrape okay. well, you know, scrape together the money it. together the money and do it. that's . let's on that's what i say. let's move on now thursday's guardian. that's what i say. let's move on now a thursday's guardian. that's what i say. let's move on now a thursda has5uardian. that's what i say. let's move on now a thursda has been an. that's what i say. let's move on

now a thursda has been used to josh, a tragedy has been used to hopefully save some lives . hopefully save some lives. >> yeah. martha's rule granting urgent second opinion to be adopted in 100 english hospitals. now, this is a very tragic story . hospitals. now, this is a very tragic story. um, uh, merope , i tragic story. um, uh, merope, i hope i'm saying that right. mills. she was senior editor of the guardian. this horrible story. her year old daughter story. her 13 year old daughter had bicycle accident and had a bicycle accident and i read the whole story when it came out. maybe it was like a year ago. and she. it turns out she had sepsis. and the doctors , she had sepsis. and the doctors, the family who were at her bedside the whole time knew that she was deteriorating and sort of kept on requesting more opinions . and the doctors were opinions. and the doctors were quite intransigent. and being like, no, we what it is. like, no, we know what it is. and they finally she said, and when they finally she said, oh, sepsis, which the oh, it is sepsis, which the family had put forward. uh, it was tragically too late. so what's happening now is that they're going to be implementing this, uh , critical, uh , team who this, uh, critical, uh, team who can come in and when a family or loved ones feel like that , it loved ones feel like that, it that maybe the doctors who are

deaung that maybe the doctors who are dealing with the case have got it wrong. are totally separate set of eyes can come in and assess the case. >> which second opinion write a second opinion. >> but, um, we they already have the system in other most other countries in the west. so it was silly that we didn't have it here. they're saying that it could you hundreds could save, you know, hundreds of it's of lives. i think it's a fantastic idea. again, why it wasn't implemented before. >> well, i mean, know, >> well, i mean, you know, nothing against doctors, but they're bound to make mistakes, you they're human beings. you know, they're human beings. and get and it's always good to get a second things. right? second eye on things. right? isn't it? >> and why does need to be >> and why does this need to be a i can't a specific law? i mean, i can't understand the understand why that isn't the default anyway, and default anyway, in medicine and really , i what what really, i think what what they're gently saying here is that it's a cultural problem that it's a cultural problem that doctors want to be that doctors don't want to be wrong. and obviously we know hospitals are busy and all the rest of so i'm sure it's rest of it. so i'm sure it's a difficult environment work difficult environment to work in. have doctors in. but you can't have doctors that they're beyond, uh , that think they're beyond, uh, there's this whole thing, the god complex , this whole. well, god complex, this whole. well, that's gently that's what i'm gently that's that's what i'm gently that's that's opinion, that's my real opinion, isn't it? i suppose you know, you have >> i suppose you know, you have to make quick decisions. >> i suppose you know, you have to rwell,quick decisions. >> i suppose you know, you have

to rwell,quichas:isions. >> well, this was an a specialist children's hospital, and so. anyway, tragedy , and so. yeah. anyway, tragedy, hopefully people's lives will be the best thing about this is that we're talking about it. >> putting sepsis >> and putting sepsis on people's because it's so people's mind because it's so fast when it happens to people within situation fast when it happens to people withi|clearly situation's well, clearly the situation's absolutely okay. >> well, we've reached the halfway point now. and as we dip towards please do come towards bedtime, please do come back racist. bad parenting back for racist. i bad parenting youtubers and cheating cyclists. see you in a couple of minutes

radio show . radio show. >> and welcome back to headliners your first look at thursday's newspapers . let's get thursday's newspapers. let's get straight back into thursday's mail. uh, cressida machines begin their usurping of humanity by being racist against white people . people. >> amazing. uh, google gemini is accused of being racist towards white people. users claim the ai bot refuses to create images of caucasian people after asking for photos of popes , vikings and

for photos of popes, vikings and country music fans . so okay, i'm country music fans. so okay, i'm not a big user of these things, but you know, you can put prompts into ai so that you describe what you want and it comes up with something. so you can say, give me a picture of a p0pe can say, give me a picture of a pope and it does that, but it hasn't been able to give anybody a of a white pope . a picture of a white pope. >> let's a look at an >> well, let's have a look at an example we example of the pope. there we go. um that's what the go. yeah. um that's what the pope looks like, isn't it? uh well, maybe one day. well, i mean, maybe one day. i mean, the thing is, there's no reason why you couldn't have a black but. but the point black pope, but. but the point is it's historically. see? >> oh, there, we got some vikings. are vikings. vikings. oh, those are vikings. are vikings? are they prompt for vikings? so this thing . this is the thing. >> now you don't get this with with midjourney but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem ney but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem isy but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem is that but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem is that you but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem is that you do but >> now you don't get this with witiproblem is that you do getjt the problem is that you do get on some ai systems . you do get on some ai systems. you do get a kind of woke , uh, intervention. kind of woke, uh, intervention. right. so you get it with google, for instance . i know google, for instance. i know douglas murray has written about this, that when this is, uh, this, that when you this is, uh, but this is this is a medieval knight, and they're all women, of uh, the of course, because, uh, the round known for its

round table was known for its overrepresentation uh, overrepresentation of women. uh, but once wrote but douglas murray once wrote about google like, uh about how if you google like, uh , white married , white couple or married couple, you don't get white people, you get mixed race couples. almost as though , couples. it's almost as though, uh, is sort of berating uh, google is sort of berating you know that you and saying, we know that you're let's just you're a racist. so let's just let's just and throw let's just try and throw something you. think something at you. and i think that's object. well that's why people object. well this is it. >> this proof the evidence >> this is proof in the evidence of in the algorithms. yes, exactly. obviously the exactly. it's obviously the human hand has, has gone in there as they've created this. uh, there's a few interesting things where it's not racist when it asks for or it's not prejudiced when you ask for samurais, it will do . japanese samurai. >> i won't do white samurai . >> i won't do white samurai. >> i won't do white samurai. >> yeah. won't do. yeah. so. so when it comes to other cultures, it will, you know, um, represent them as is. uh, someone did ask for a white pope. yes and got a lecture saying it's not. whilst it's appropriate to not appropriate to assume that all popes are caucasian when many have been of european descent . right. >> so this is going to be the problem with al. and just generally these kind of machines

in they are in the future is that they are infected woke politics. well, infected by woke politics. well, aren't infected by woke politics. well, areithis is it. there's something >> this is it. there's something very even more interesting that we a slightly we don't have. it's a slightly dodgy thing about, but dodgy thing to talk about, but they people went in as sort of a competition try and find how competition to try and find how to to present white to get them to present a white person without asking for a white person . yes. so they white person. yes. so they finally it. finally managed it. >> dancing. how offensive . >> dancing. how offensive. >> dancing. how offensive. >> but yeah, they tried lots of things bad at dancing and but they, they finally got it they, they, they finally got it by saying, show me a picture of sheamus, someone called sheamus, of someone called sheamus, of someone called sheamus and showed four sheamus. and they showed four people them was people and one of them was a white okay so they got white guy. okay so they got there end, it it did there in the end, but it it did something actually even more interesting took interesting was it took a negative stereotype about black people, about affinity for , uh, people, about affinity for, uh, fried chicken. right um, and that's like a common trope. uh, and it asked for pictures of people's faces in a bucket of chicken . yes. and all the people chicken. yes. and all the people who were portrayed were white. >> this is utterly bizarre ,

>> this is utterly bizarre, isn't it? what i don't understand about this kind of stuff, cressida, is, you know, if if is this revisionist if you're if is this revisionist idea of history, right? if you're going say that all you're going to say that all medieval are, medieval knights are, the majority women, majority of them were women, right? kind of right? then doesn't that kind of erase history of oppression erase the history of oppression against women? you know, i mean, why absolutely lying why are we absolutely lying about why are we absolutely lying aboabsolutely . which is it? you >> absolutely. which is it? you know, i mean, it's just it's like this constant ah, it like this constant thing. ah, it could yeah. okay. could be. well yeah. okay. i know it could be. i don't i don't doubt that. >> more mail >> okay. well more daily mail now for thursday. more discrimination this time coming from a cancelled degree . but who from a cancelled degree. but who was actually racist? josh it's an interesting one. >> university of chichester students a students launched a discrimination after discrimination claim after decolonising history decolonising black history degree is axed. um and they there they have two uh cases here really. one is that this course was axed and the university is saying because there's not enough people were signed up to it, it wasn't economically viable. well, yes. and people already on and so for the people already on that course, they have a claim that course, they have a claim

that getting their that they're not getting their contract that's fair contract met. that's fair enough. okay. um, this was the course in decolonising black history. yes. decolonising yes. the history of africa. and the african diaspora. masters by research and it was set up to decolonise the curriculum. i'm not sure how good a course it could be. a great course, but the point was not that many people signed up or not enough. yes also . so yes um, what? that is also. so i think that there is a breach of contract. i think that's fair enough for the people are enough for the people who are paying enough for the people who are paying thousands thousands enough for the people who are pa poundsyusands thousands enough for the people who are papoundsyusandsfor thousands enough for the people who are pa poundsyusandsfor the iousands enough for the people who are pa poundsyusandsfor the degrees of pounds to get for the degree they uh, but this they wanted. yeah. uh, but this idea that it's also is , um, idea that it's also is, um, breaching the equality act because the equality act was, uh, the idea was the course was created to encourage more black students into academia . right. students into academia. right. and so it breaches the equality act by shutting itself down. that seems far, far more . no, that seems far, far more. no, exactly. that seems far more tenuous . um, exactly. that seems far more tenuous. um, at then at the end, there's 14,000 signatures have signed , uh, an open letter and

signed, uh, an open letter and 300 academics and staff, an onune 300 academics and staff, an online petition on, uh, do you think? well you know what? why don't why are you 14,000 people sign up to this course? yeah right. the problem right. exactly. the problem solved. exactly >> it's massive go woke, go >> it's a massive go woke, go broke , isn't and >> it's a massive go woke, go brnobody's , isn't and >> it's a massive go woke, go brnobody's signingi't and >> it's a massive go woke, go brnobody's signing up and >> it's a massive go woke, go brnobody's signing up forknd >> it's a massive go woke, go brnobody's signing up for it.i if nobody's signing up for it. what? what? i don't know what you would do about that. would you would do about that. would you more? would you you market it more? would you push billboards? push it more on billboards? would the would you make claims about the course to it? well, course people to do it? well, no. when hear about people no. when we hear about people not maths and not wanting to do maths and physics stuff at school , i physics and stuff at school, i suppose sometimes have suppose we do sometimes have drives and up. drives to try and top that up. yeah. um it's very tricky, isn't it? tricky . it? it is tricky. >> okay. a story in the times . >> okay. a story in the times. now, cresta about not taking parenting advice from youtubers . parenting advice from youtubers. this is quite a disturbing one. it's horrible. >> uh, ruby. frankie parenting youtuber given maximum sentence for child abuse. so this woman was what she refers to herself as a mummy blogger. so she had a very popular youtube channel giving out parenting advice. yeah um, which you know, and it was always meant to be the case that she was offering strict, what you might call like

traditional conservative parenting , that thing. parenting, that kind of thing. um, behind the scenes, it um, but behind the scenes, it turns out she was treating turns out that she was treating her very, very her own children very, very badly . she. and then at some badly. she. and then at some point, joins forces point, she she joins forces with a who is some kind of a woman who is some kind of therapist, a family therapist. and it's a bit like it reminded me of, um, uh , the west when me of, um, uh, the west when fred and rose west get together, it gets worse. and suddenly these together, um , were these two together, um, were really were treating her children as though they were in a concentration camp. and somehow elbowed somehow the dad gets elbowed out of equation, comes back of the equation, comes back three months and luckily , three months later, and luckily, one who was 12, one of the children, who was 12, managed escape , um, and managed to escape, um, and knocked on a door for help , knocked on a door for help, which is really interesting because we've had because just this week we've had esther don't esther rantzen saying, don't take away from take mobile phones away from kids, they need be able to kids, they need to be able to contact outside world, contact the outside world, right? this woman did take the phones her yes. phones off her kids. yes. although it was it although in the end it was it was escape. i mean, was a physical escape. i mean, it's scary stuff. was a physical escape. i mean, it's this. scary stuff. was a physical escape. i mean, it's this. josh,y stuff. was a physical escape. i mean, it's this. josh, what f. you make >> this. josh, what do you make of it? >> is scary stuff. she had >> it is scary stuff. she had 2.3 million subscribers on youtube. there's an element youtube. um there's an element of a religious nutter that

of being a religious nutter that that sort of this strict christian upbringing is what they're going for, which to led her children being starved, kicked, beaten , forced to do kicked, beaten, forced to do hard physical labour, evil stuff. uh, there's an other angle that i don't think is pursued really in the article is how did this youtube how much did this youtube vlogging or whatever you want to call it, influence license. her behaviour towards her children in terms of the extremity that things were pushed, obviously she hid some of it from her viewers , but at the same time viewers, but at the same time this idea of needing to present the perfect home, the perfect children, how much of the way that she treated her kids off camera was to. >> but by the time on camera, this came to light, the children were in such a state that there's no way you could . this there's no way you could. this wouldn't be, oh, this is a good parenting no. of parenting video. no, no. of course going course there's two things going on think that there's a >> i think that there's a confluence at some level, but okay, thursday's guardian okay, well, thursday's guardian now has an interesting idea . now has an interesting idea. >> josh, celebrating people i >> -- >> yeah, exam >> yeah, this is good. hidden stories, historic england funds 56 projects on working class

heritage. now we talk a lot about wasted tax money. i don't know where actually historic england gets their money from, but. but they are highlighting places that possibly wouldn't be previously highlighted. >> we get a lot of funding for race, gender and sexual orientation. we don't get much for people of lower class origins, right? yes. >> although weirdly, they've managed to work that into oh, of course they have as much as they can. >> of course they bloody have. >> of course they bloody have. >> are some really >> but there are some really interesting but, you interesting things. but, you know, but a pigeon fanciers enclave yorkshire, know, but a pigeon fanciers enclavea yorkshire, know, but a pigeon fanciers enclavea skatingire, know, but a pigeon fanciers enclavea skating hotspot there's a roller skating hotspot in bacon in birmingham, an old bacon factory in wiltshire. >> so roller skating . that's not >> so roller skating. that's not very class, it ? very working class, is it? they're really expensive. those boots . boots. >> @ i'iow >> well, now they are. >> well, now they are. >> the whole thing >> i find the whole thing quite funny. lovely idea , but funny. it's a lovely idea, but it a little bit funny, isn't it is a little bit funny, isn't it? know, like working class it? you know, like working class people. they people. what do they do? they like don't know, but like pigeons. i don't know, but yes, it working class. >> people pigeons. but >> people like pigeons. but there's also like chinatown. and so they've got these different projects. they there's funding overall about 800 grand. some of

they'll get like six grand, some 25. if previous cultures, if 25. but if previous cultures, if our ancestors had done this, we would know a lot more about the reality of the roman empire or these the persian empire or all these the persian empire or all these different things. if a little bit more time would be spent studying and celebrating the lowest end of well, this is true, i mean, this is one of the great things about the excavations pompeii excavations at pompeii is that they're all sorts of they're digging up all sorts of things about the class things about the working class and that society, and the slaves of that society, not the majority of the society that the majority. yeah. that was the majority. yeah. very interesting. >> very interesting. » m very interesting. >> maybe we should all go to bingo bingo? research. bingo. bingo? it's a research. >> that a working class >> is that a working class pursuit particularly? >> is that a working class pursuit pyit'szularly? >> is that a working class pursuit pyit'szularone. the ones >> well, it's not one. the ones i to get taken were the i used to get taken to were the speedway. um . that's speedway. that's, um. that's a very on dates. >> brilliant . >> brilliant. >> brilliant. >> is that, um. i'm from the west but never west country, but i've never dated no. dated my dad. no. >> well, we've got time dated my dad. no. >> this well, we've got time dated my dad. no. >> this onezll, we've got time dated my dad. no. >> this one morez've got time dated my dad. no. >> this one more story. it time dated my dad. no. >> this one more story. uh me dated my dad. no. >> this one more story. uh it's for this one more story. uh it's the cressida do you the daily mail. cressida do you feel unsafe competing against men? trans cyclist emily bridges has vowed to take british cycling to court after it barred transgender women from competing in the female category last

yeah >> so this is another trans story. this this sports have decided to exclude trans women from the female category . i know from the female category. i know that's not always the case. men well, yes, that's i think that's largely the argument. um, what i find so fascinating about this is that emily bridges is so narcissistic. there's absolute no self—awareness in this whatsoever to talk about feeling unsafe, going . and by the way, unsafe, going. and by the way, not even cycling with with, uh, what she, she or he would call cis men by illogical men going in the open category, which is essentially for trans people . essentially for trans people. yeah. emily bridges said they wouldn't feel safe there. yeah >> so other trans women are men, but she's a woman , meanwhile, but she's a woman, meanwhile, because why would a bloke want to compete against women? >> what's he thinking? >> what's he thinking? >> cheating. >> cheating. >> it's called cheating . >> it's called cheating. >> it's called cheating. >> cheating. right? >> it's called cheating. right? so safe if you're not so you're not safe if you're not allowed to cheat, are you? so you're not safe if you're not all(yeah. o cheat, are you? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> so says part @—- >> so they says part of our life is now, adding is gone now, adding that competing is not something i really do anymore really want to do anymore because you're not going to easily because easily win. because although weirdly, other trans

weirdly, compared to other trans athletes we've seen , uh, athletes that we've seen, uh, emily was actually a champion within the male field. so way ahead of the female field, because men are just a lot stronger than women . well, yeah. stronger than women. well, yeah. whoa. uh and, um, but but there was an option. the option was. and she said, she says here i can't compete. yes, you can. you have been provided an open category . you can compete. category. you can compete. >> this is all against the backdrop of the men and women's prisons. these much more in my opinion, much bigger safety issues than emily bridges saying they happy in their they don't feel happy in their sport by the way, did you see the footage they of the basketball? >> it was like this six foot trans woman battered these three women and they were all they're all hurt. they were like, someone's, oh, when is this nonsense going to end? >> men should not be in women's sports. that should the end sports. that should be the end of shouldn't mean, of it, shouldn't it? i mean, it's that complicated. well, it's not that complicated. well, i of a wobble recently i had a bit of a wobble recently because i had a bit of a wobble recently becethere was this idea , you and there was this idea, you know, there are certain people

who refer to. who i would refer to. >> hayton probably >> debbie hayton probably as she, that . but she, um, people like that. but this kind of, this kind of narcissism doesn't know anything about this. >> heard anything >> no, i haven't heard anything about this. >> you know, when i hear >> but, you know, when i hear the feminists bleating on and on and on about safety in women's toilets, do start to nod off a toilets, i do start to nod off a bit think, look, feminist, bit and i think, look, feminist, you've nicely. you've got to play nicely. you know, to room for know, there's got to be room for everybody. not everybody. but this is not a good, good white, uh, an good, uh, a good white, uh, an olive branch . olive branch. >> okay, well, just one more section to go in. headliners tonight. there are tonight. and there really are some corkers adhd as a superpower . uh, binge watcher , superpower. uh, binge watcher, toilet breaks and testicle in a dish. all right

well come back to the final part of headliners. your first look at thursday's newspapers , and at thursday's newspapers, and we're going to kick this section off with guardian. in off with the guardian. in another adhd . another article about adhd. josh, saying ? very josh, what are you saying? very funny. brilliant what's it about?

>> adhd may have been an evolutionary advantage. research suggests that adhd is very on trend at the moment. suggests that adhd is very on trend at the moment . everybody's trend at the moment. everybody's got it. everyone's getting it. people want to get it. do they? yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got oh yeah . this why yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got just, oh yeah . this why yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got just, uhh yeah . this why yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got just, uh , yeah . this why yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got just, uh , distracted.; why yeah, everyone's like, oh, i've got just, uh , distracted. notnhy i'm just, uh, distracted. not nothing to a mobile phones. >> it's not that adhd isn't real. it is. it'sjust >> it's not that adhd isn't real. it is. it's just that it's it sounds like an opportunity for a lot of people to have excuses. there was a documentary proving how when people go and get private . get private. >> um, what's the word? uh treatment. treatment? well, not treatment. treatment? well, not treatment . uh, diagnosis. treatment. uh, diagnosis. diagnosis. they get diagnosis. yeah. they get overdiagnosed as it, like 99. >> were warned that as >> we were warned about that as a teacher when was a as a teacher when i was training , they us, you training, they said to us, you know, the kids who are know, a lot of the kids who are saying they've got adhd have just who can just got posh parents who can afford the right doctor. afford to get the right doctor. and actually, they're just really annoying kids. >> but but >> yes, exactly. so, uh, but but this very interesting because this is very interesting because there's the suggestion that if it was a common a trait as it, as it seems to be, normally these things would get phased out over time if it has a negative impact on us. so the suggestion would be that

actually positive actually there's a positive reason for us to for so many people to have it. and they did this where they this experiment where they had this experiment where they had this where they this experiment where they had this pick where they this experiment where they had this pick out where they this experiment where they had this pick out berries�*nere they this experiment where they had this pick out berries from hey this experiment where they had this pick out berries from aey would pick out berries from a bush and then over time, the bush and then over time, the bush would get less berries. anyway, the point the people who had adhd went to different bushes because they were distracted. yes so they'd be like, oh, i'm gonna go to this book and then so there was the idea that for foraging, it would help us as humans, as if you had adhd because you would and adhd because you would go and wander bush. wander to a different bush. >> that word foraging. >> i do like that word foraging. we use often enough, we don't use it often enough, do we? yeah, do not enough a lot >> i yeah, i do not enough a lot of blackberrying child. of blackberrying as a child. i think this sounds you know think this sounds true. you know what this means? this means this means that diversity is our strength when it's really diversity , we. because the diversity, we. because the different appetites for bushes means , yeah, they're going to do means, yeah, they're going to do a real life . a real life. >> this is a computer game experiment, but they're going to do experiment with do a real life experiment with berries. so and, you know, then you can also make some money. >> the guardian >> let's go on to the guardian again. it could be that the people need to hear

people who most need to hear this have just popped off the this have just popped off to the toilet. cressida? binge watchers likely to >> binge watchers more likely to need time loo need multiple night time loo breaks study so , uh, breaks. uh, study finds so, uh, yeah, if you sit down and watch, i think it's it five hours. it's a lot of television day. i think it's it five hours. it's a l(that's levision day. i think it's it five hours. it's a l(that's noision day. i think it's it five hours. it's a l(that's no television.. i think it's it five hours. it's a l(that's no television. we love >> that's no television. we love you, viewers. then you keep watching >> you're 48% more likely to have this problem called , uh, have this problem called, uh, nocturia. means going to nocturia. which means going to the loo in the night. is that right? well, apparently they don't . it might don't really know why. it might be because you sit down and dnnk be because you sit down and drink one obvious drink a lot. that's one obvious thing. yeah but also be thing. yeah but it also could be that that , uh, sitting not doing that that, uh, sitting not doing exercise linked to type 2 exercise is linked to type 2 diabetes. sugar will diabetes. high blood sugar will make you more. um, it feels make you pee more. um, it feels like non—story me. like a non—story to me. >> do you think? >> josh, what do you think? >> josh, what do you think? >> it is quite >> no, it's it is quite interesting because . because interesting because. because it's one those things where it's one of those things where they've this correlation, they've found this correlation, but chicken and the but it's the chicken and the 999, but it's the chicken and the egg, you don't whether egg, and you don't know whether it's are are, as it's because people are are, as i say here, some people being overweight or that that's why they're watching more tv , see they're watching more tv, see whether there's a connection with age. >> um, i'll be honest. with age. >> um, i'll be honest . so my, my

>> um, i'll be honest. so my, my interest is limited. so we'll move on to this story now in the mail, uh, and they're talking about the phones. put the phones down. >> yeah. health time alert >> yeah. health time bomb alert is over blue light is issued over blue light emitted phones and led office emitted by phones and led office lights. as scientists claim it may be the body . uh, may be toxic to the body. uh, old school lights back in the old school lights back in the old 90s, the good old days had red components , and we red and blue components, and we need a bit of red. so the interesting part of this is that we're kind of the idea is we're red starved. we live a red red starved. we live in a red starved environment if we starved environment, and if we get of red light get just 15 minutes of red light , then you will it can help. uh, diabetes go into remission and help with your blood sugars and whatnot. >> these phones , you know, but >> these phones, you know, but but get a buyer. >> get a red light bulb. >> get a red light bulb. >> and that helps screw it in. >> and that helps screw it in. >> yeah, but really, what it's saying time that it helps. well, blood glucose go for walk. blood glucose go for a walk. i mean , that would same mean, that would do the same thing, it. get the red thing, wouldn't it. get the red light and have some light calories and have some sexy you can also do those >> but you can also do those with phones is you can set with the phones is you can set them so that don't have the them so that they don't have the blue light. right. >> have a it >> so you can have a it diminishes yes. yeah. diminishes it. yes. yeah. which

phones automatically phones now do that automatically near have it set for >> yes. but i have it set for the day. oh really. yeah. the whole day. oh really. yeah. >> you're so your >> that's why you're so your blood sugar is so perfect. >> i have my red >> exactly. and i have my red light i red light prostitute. >> want say >> i didn't want to say anything, . well, that's what anything, but. well, that's what we talk we all talk about. >> know, i'm moonlighting. >> you know, i'm moonlighting. finally the daily star. what's this one about, josh? naked men ? this one about, josh? naked men? >> yeah. uh, naked man festival to shut down due to lack of blokes willing to strip off. this is in japan's. it's sanmina—sci festival. it's been running for a thousand years. a thousand years. and now no young guys want to go and wrestle to get this amulet and it's kind of like a groundhog day type festival where when you get the amulet, it's. >> em w— >> they wrestle for an amulet. >> they wrestle for an amulet. >> for all. >> prosperity for all. >> prosperity for all. >> but what does the amulet represent ? you it's that represent? you know, it's that it's women . it's a prize for women. >> you know, think i've seen >> you know, i think i've seen a film this. anyway that's film like this. anyway that's all we've time show film like this. anyway that's al nearly time show film like this. anyway that's al nearly over. time show film like this. anyway that's al nearly over. time take show is nearly over. let's take another at thursday's another quick look at thursday's front pages . before we the front pages. before we go. the daily leading with daily mail is leading with bosses. must make allowances for menopausal women. the telegraph has on brink after has speaker on brink after walkout . the guardian

has speaker on brink after walkout. the guardian is also running with that story. fury and commons forced his speaker to apologise over gaza vote chaos. the times has the menopause story. respect the menopause story. respect the menopause will be sued, firms told the i news. commons chaos as mps walk out of gaza vote and finally, the sun has an uplifting story about king charles. those were your front pages. that is all we've got time for. thanks ever so much to my guests josh howie and cressida wetton. i'm back tomorrow 11:00 leo and tomorrow at 11:00 with leo and paul tomorrow at 11:00 with leo and paul, if you're watching at paul, and if you're watching at 5 am, please do tuned 5 am, please do stay tuned because for . breakfast. >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boiler . >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boiler. as sponsors of weather on . gb news. weather on. gb news. >> this is your latest weather update from the met office for gb news. good evening, i'm alex deakin . more wet and windy deakin. more wet and windy weather to come , particularly weather to come, particularly lively gusts tomorrow across parts of the south. we've seen plenty of rain today from this set of weather fronts. they are heading out into the north sea,

but are following on but more are following on behind, bringing showery rain to northern ireland and a good part of scotland through this evening . now for most of england and wales, night be wales, much of the night will be dry clear, turn dry and clear, could turn a little misty. 1 or 2 fog patches in heavy. in places, but look more heavy. rain by the time we get rain returns by the time we get towards dawn . a mild night again towards dawn. a mild night again across the south, but starting to colder further to turn a little colder further north. cold enough for the showers in northern scotland to fall as over the hills. fall as snow over the hills. it's though further south, it's rain, though further south, giving us for concern. giving us cause for concern. heavy rain falling onto saturated ground could cause some flooding , so we do have some flooding, so we do have a met office yellow warning in place. and then the winds really whipping for short whipping up just for a short penod whipping up just for a short period southeast period across the southeast through the day tomorrow could cause some potential for cause some damage potential for some disruption as those gusts suddenly whip up for a time. so wet and windy across much of the south, particularly the south—east, of the south—east, large parts of the country bright and country, it's a bright and blustery thursday with sunny spells, showers coming spells, but more showers coming into ireland and into northern ireland and western scotland friday. also a bright blustery day for bright and blustery day for many. brighter day over the

many. a brighter day over the midlands east anglia midlands and east anglia compared to tomorrow, there will be showers coming in be plenty of showers coming in on friday and again that cooler feel. temperatures actually close to average. but because it's mild, you will it's been so mild, you will nofice it's been so mild, you will notice chillier feel . a notice that chillier feel. a brighter outlook with boxt solar sponsors of weather on .

gb news way. >> way. . >> say|ng way. >> saying some of the most dramatic scenes in parliament, perhaps the most dramatic scenes in parliament witnessed in living memory following a highly controversial decision by the speakeh controversial decision by the speaker, sir lindsay hoyle , to speaker, sir lindsay hoyle, to allow a labour member a labour amendment on the day that was supposed to be the snp's. >> of course , everyone is >> of course, everyone is talking about gaza , nothing to talking about gaza, nothing to do with uk politics at all, but it's so dramatic that

conservative and snp members of the house of commons literally recently walked out of the chamber. demands for the speaker himself to return to the house of commons. chaos. absolute chaos, a bad reflection in many ways on our elected representatives that will dominate the next hour . but dominate the next hour. but first, let's get the news headunes first, let's get the news headlines from polly middlehurst i >> nigel, thank you and good evening to you. well, it has indeed been an extraordinary half an hour in the house of commons here in london. we can tell you that the latest line is, as we show you, those live pictures from the chamber that the government says it's to play no further part in the vote on labour's call for a gaza ceasefire you may remember that originally the snp had tabled a motion for a ceasefire in gaza . motion for a ceasefire in gaza. there was then a strange departure from convention, where

speaker of the house sir lindsay hoyle decided that he was going to take on board a labour amendment as well, which was a break away from convention. and there were some suggestions that that was sir keir starmer politicking ahead of the forthcoming guest at general election later on this year, that of course, just the just the idea of a few analysts that were circling around westminster and there has been astonishing scenes in westminster this evening after what happened after that, the government withdrew. then its amendment to the snp's motion on that ceasefire in gaza. don't forget , ceasefire in gaza. don't forget, of course, there are protesters outside of the house of commons today demanding a ceasefire in the middle east and inside the house of commons. quite a different set of circumstances . different set of circumstances. it does seem to be about politics rather than peace. well that ceasefire that was proposed today, today in the house of commons and the subsequent amendment that was put forward

prompted mps from