have not been able to speak to her former post office chief executive paula vennells has been stripped of her cbe by the king following the horizon it scandal. she was heavily criticised for routinely denied any problems with the system , any problems with the system, which led to the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of subpostmasters . she received the subpostmasters. she received the honourin subpostmasters. she received the honour in 2018 and announced that she planned to hand it back with immediate effect. last month . she'll now formally lose month. she'll now formally lose the title for bringing the honours system into disrepute . honours system into disrepute. an unexploded second world war bomb found in plymouth has now been successfully taken out to sea, and police say it's detonation could be tonight or tomorrow. the 500 kilogram device was found in a garden in cheam and lifted onto a military vehicle . 10,000 residents are vehicle. 10,000 residents are now being allowed back to return back to their homes following its removal. local mp johnny mercer has thanked emergency responders who worked around the

clock . a protest has taken place clock. a protest has taken place outside the home office following the sentencing of a small boat pilot for manslaughter for ibrahim abad had had been piloting the unseaworthy inflatable between france and the uk in december of 2022, when four people drowned following a retrial at canterbury crown court . bar was canterbury crown court. bar was sentenced to nine years and six months. he had claimed that smugglers threatened to kill him if he refused to steer the boat, but the prosecution said he owed the passengers a duty of care and nigel farage says the 2024 us election in affects the safety of the world. the gb news presenter was speaking at the conservative political action conference just outside of washington dc, where he urged delegates to support donald trump. he cited the uk's recent pro—palestine protest and claimed an extremist fringe is now threatening our democracy , now threatening our democracy, and now we see british politicians cowed and scared.

>> they were even scared to leave the building on wednesday and thursday evenings because we've forgotten who we are. we've forgotten what we are and we've allowed an extremist fringe to bully us and threaten our very democracy . and that is our very democracy. and that is why we need strong leaders. that's why we need leaders of conviction . it's why you in conviction. it's why you in america , and we in the world america, and we in the world need trump back in that white house >> well, for the latest stories , >> well, for the latest stories, sign up to gb news alerts by scanning the qr code on your screen or go to gb news. common alerts. now let's get back to . patrick >> extreme islamists who are not here to peacefully coexist with you. they are here to take over. and it should not be controversial to point this out. suella braverman today has said this. the truth is that the islamist extremists and the

anti—semites are now in charge . anti—semites are now in charge. they have bullied the labour party, they have bullied our institutions, and now they have bullied our country into submission. well the unfortunate fact of fact for suella braverman of course, the conservative course, is that the conservative government charge government has been in charge for and still for 14 years and we've still ended up in this situation. but look at the direction of travel in at how much of in britain. look at how much of a problem islamist a problem extreme islamist terrorism is. look at how many people there are lurking in the shadows with very extreme views and look at the mob tactics that they are prepared to use to get their way . why is it that only their way. why is it that only those on the left don't seem to think that an extreme islamist takeover is a problem? i've got a few theories. i could be anti—semitism . it could be that anti—semitism. it could be that they don't want to admit that their ideology has allowed an extremist trojan horse into britain . it could be that they britain. it could be that they don't actually like britain very much. they're the ones who seem focussed on our historic wrongs and destroying a sense of nafionhood and destroying a sense of nationhood it nationhood and patriotic ism. it could of course , fear of could be, of course, fear of being called a racist . now,

being called a racist. now, i think most people can see the direction of travel in britain, and most people are concerned about it . but and most people are concerned about it. but i would argue not. these people . these people. >> sadly, you would expect >> sadly, what you would expect from suella braverman, who has a history of deliberately history of just deliberately saying inflammatory things for the sake of headlines . so the sake of headlines. so i don't think we should take seriously her comments . seriously her comments. >> well, that's the woman who may very well be next home may very well be your next home secretary, saying , in my secretary, saying, in my opinion, that she doesn't really take extremism take the threat of extremism that forward. that seriously. step forward. humza yousaf with this tweet suella braverman is the worst of politicians. as an individual who deliberately stokes the fires and religious fires of racial and religious tensions for self—serving purposes with no regard to the greater societal damage she is doing. the very definition of a scorched earth policy shameful . scorched earth policy shameful. well, i don't really think mr yousaf should try to take the moral high ground when it comes to talking about stoking division. do you, lord justice clerk white, every high court judge white, the lord advocate, white obviously sadiq khan has

got involved saying suella braverman seek to be doing her best to outflank enoch powell. it's a poisonous attempt to drive a wedge between our communities and serve her own name . ambition. now, more than name. ambition. now, more than even name. ambition. now, more than ever, we should be seeking to unite, not divide . well, it's unite, not divide. well, it's the same sadiq khan who reportedly said that a white family doesn't really represent londoners agreed to hoisting a donald trump blimp over central london whilst the us president came and visited . or, for what came and visited. or, for what it's worth as well, sadiq khan will never fully shake off his alleged links with extremists. the times reports that he attended events with anwar al awlaki, who has acted as an al—qaeda recruiter. khan also reportedly spoke nine times alongside suliman gani, a hardline imam based in the mps tooting seat, who on the night of the paris massacres joined a campaign for an islamic state sadiq khan. of course , denies sadiq khan. of course, denies that he's got any links with extremism. look in literally the last couple of days alone , we've

last couple of days alone, we've had a perfect microcosm of where we're at with this debate . mps we're at with this debate. mps clearly unable to vote the way that they wanted to because of threats, intimidation of politicians as extremists on the streets , mafia style tactics use streets, mafia style tactics use racist , genocidal slogans, be racist, genocidal slogans, be armed on to parliament so that has happened and then a former home secretary speaks out about it.then home secretary speaks out about it. then potentially the future home secretary , the leader of home secretary, the leader of scotland and the mayor of our capital city had all by about 9 am. this morning, smeared her, said that she's talking rubbish and told everybody not to listen to her. and so the cycle continues . ask yourselves this. continues. ask yourselves this. okay try to imagine britain in 20 years time. do you like what you see? let's get the thoughts now of my panel. we've got the director of the popular conservatives. it is mark littlewood. we've also got frances, finalist joanna jarjue and former bbc political chief john sergeant mark. i'll just ask your view on this. do you

think suella braverman was too extreme in what she was saying earlier on about the islamist takeover of britain? >> little. i think she's got a point. i read her article with interest. i don't really agree with her that islamists are in charge of britain now . they are charge of britain now. they are not in charge of britain now. but i think they have been indulged. the problem is that we are not calling out extremism when find it, and in public when we find it, and in public debate in britain now, it seems to that the overridingly to be that the overridingly important is nobody must important thing is nobody must ever be offended, we ever be offended, ever. we mustn't cause any offence, and i think we therefore tiptoe around these issues rather than calling them out, and that she's right. but i don't really blame the islamists themselves , as they're islamists themselves, as they're a very small minority. i think the point that she's trying to make it's weak willed make is it's the weak willed majority simply majority who are simply unwilling stand up to these unwilling to stand up to these sort extremists. sort of extremists. yes >> joanna, was well , not >> okay. joanna, i was well, not really amazed because really that amazed because i kind expected it to happen. kind of expected it to happen. but when see the of but when you see the likes of yvette could be our yvette cooper could well be our next secretary. humza next home secretary. humza yousaf, leader of scotland, yousaf, the leader of scotland, the our capital city,

the mayor of our capital city, all themselves to all tripping over themselves to completely suella completely discredit suella braverman don't braverman and say, you don't need this woman. need to listen to this woman. well, makes me question well, it makes me question whether not they actually whether or not they actually take seriously, take the threat that seriously, especially the scenes that especially given the scenes that we saw on wednesday night. for example. >> can you take it >> well, how can you take it seriously when braverman seriously when suella braverman uses inflammatory language? seriously when suella braverman uses ifflammatory language? seriously when suella braverman uses ifflam actually anguage? seriously when suella braverman uses ifflam actually spoke ge? you know, if she actually spoke normally, know , in a kind of normally, you know, in a kind of balanced tone and to say that she's been a minister before, you would think that she would have practice that. but have good practice of that. but she said even worse she probably said even worse things in that things when she was in that position. can you take her position. how can you take her seriously? she's seriously? you know, she's saying islamists are taking saying that islamists are taking oven i saying that islamists are taking over, i feel as if over, and i almost feel as if there's big, um, you know, there's a big, um, you know, she's basically conflating islamists extreme islamist islamists as an extreme islamist who we all obviously don't support with just the general muslim population . and i think muslim population. and i think that's completely wrong. and for her you know, we're her to say, you know, we're sleep woke walking into a getaway society that threatens free speech, who's the person who was calling protest for peace in palestine? yes. you know, you probably say that, you know, you probably say that, you know, there was a mixed group and people were shouting out

things. >> or we'll say that because i was there to be fair. >> well, yes, i experienced it. but also to call those hate marches when you've got somebody who tars basically whole who tars basically a whole people brush, how can people with one brush, how can you her seriously when she, you take her seriously when she, you take her seriously when she, you herself is you know, she herself is extreme. all right. >> well come that. >> well we'll come back to that. i mean, when it comes to her saying that islamists in saying that islamists are in charge john, charge of britain now, john, that might be extreme. i that itself might be extreme. i do about direction of do worry about the direction of travel, well you can travel, though. well you can worry about all these things, but to know from her but she ought to know from her time the that these time in the cabinet that these are complicated issues. time in the cabinet that these are they're:ated issues. time in the cabinet that these are they're noti issues. time in the cabinet that these are they're not the ues. time in the cabinet that these are they're not the kind of thing >> they're not the kind of thing where can just say, they're where you can just say, they're all doing they're taking all doing this, they're taking over and to end, as says, by over and to end, as she says, by saying all fight must saying all the fight back must start we are to preserve start now. if we are to preserve the liberties cherish and the the liberties we cherish and the privileges this country affords us all, if we are to have any chance of saving our country from the mob. well, i just go back to my own experience as a kid growing up right after the war, rationing, the difficulties we had , the pollution, the four

we had, the pollution, the four minute warning we thought we would get for nuclear attack by the russians, the ira campaign, which nearly killed two of our prime ministers margaret thatcher john major . the thatcher and john major. the idea that our countries had this wonderful, peaceful period and now we're threatened that john is absolutely absurd. >> surely you are deeply concerned with an increasing only, i would say, organised and extreme. sure, people did . extreme. sure, people did. >> directly impacting a lot of these things are worrying as it was certainly some of the things i've talked about, like the ira campaign, were incredibly worrying. use this worrying. but if you use this language , what do you do when language, what do you do when there's a real, real threat now? well, argue you've well, i would argue you've exhausted language, not of exhausted the language, not of that sort. no this is no, we are not about to be threatened. amazingly by an attack by nuclear missiles, from from russia. we're not. you may think we are. and it's much it's no, it's much more serious than it was. but it's not like it was in the 1950s or the 1960s. we do not have an ira bombing campaign

thatis not have an ira bombing campaign that is threatening us every single day . my kids couldn't go single day. my kids couldn't go to school in central london 40 odd because the bombing came on a terror watch list. all right. but all right. but let us get this in some sort of sense, like an ordinary home secretary or a former home secretary, and they would never talk like this. they'd be calm. right reasonable and and concerned , and worried and concerned, according to suella. and that's what probably what we ought to be probably sleepwalking an absolute sleepwalking towards an absolute mess. >> f mean , it's her >> yeah. i mean, it's her language, inflammatory . i mean, language, inflammatory. i mean, it's appalling. um is it what are the i mean, what are the particular things that she says that are inflammatory, which you say, i think got a good say, i think she's got a good point the ghettoisation of point about the ghettoisation of society that we have not really encouraged assimilation as much as that we should . i mean, one as that we should. i mean, one shouldn't go out of one's way to offend religious or ethnic minorities for the sake of it. i'm not suggesting that, but i mean, she references, i think, in her article the battle , um, in her article the battle, um, grammar school, where you know, any sort of suggestion that you

might have said something untoward in some minor about might have said something unt> not that i've noticed. they've bullied labour they've bullied the labour party. they've bullied our institutions they have institutions and they have bullied our country. wait for it into submission . well, that is into submission. well, that is crazy. that is not actually true. >> can you imagine ? >> can you imagine? >> can you imagine? >> can you imagine? >> can i just ask on this one then? so when you see schools now being dragged to the high court because they don't want to have a designated prayer room in there, for example , you see there, for example, you see issues going on throughout society, whether it's an infiltration of prevent or whether or not our whether or not it's our education system. serious question marks over the legal

system. when it came to the prosecution and the sentencing for those people who had those paragliders well. and you paragliders on as well. and you see now increasing political movements to point where movements to the point where parliamentary was all right. >> so we're being asked she's being our country is being bullied into submission. >> come on. »- >> come on. >> well, we did submit on wednesday. >> no, no, wait, hold on a moment. we are in a general election year. we're moving rather sedately towards our general election. absolutely as per normal. >> seems to me towards the general election, mark. >> i mean, we do have some quite extreme fruity characters who are running at this next general election stand election and going to stand against certain by the way, against certain mps. by the way, apparently there's against certain mps. by the way, appar> no, i am concerned learned about febrile nature about the sort of febrile nature of public debate at the moment. ihear of public debate at the moment. i hear what john's saying. i mean, i'm not anticipating that some islamic revolution is going to overthrow british democracy. i'm not anticipating that. but as i say , i think suella as i say, i think suella braverman has got a point that we not encouraged

we have not encouraged assimilation the way we should have done. i think have been have done. i think we have been slightly walking on eggshells. >> can't you say it in the >> why can't you say it in the way you say it? yeah, okay. >> i mean, i wish she would use my tone of voice. >> exactly. your tone voice. >> exactly. your tone of voice. >> exactly. your tone of voice. >> you know, these are >> these, you know, these are these things pointing these are things worth pointing out. concerned we out. i'm just concerned that we are sensitive about making are over sensitive about making sure nobody ever offended. sure nobody is ever offended. well hang on a minute, because you could. >> emm- you could. >> look at that both >> you could look at that both ways. because imagine if ways. because can you imagine if any labour mp said that the jewish community are in charge of britain now? that would be anti—semitic, if said, anti—semitic, or if they said, oh, the are biased when it oh, the media are biased when it comes israel and palestine. comes to israel and palestine. so why it that she can say it so why is it that she can say it about islamists, which she knows people just people will conflate with just the community? the general muslim community? >> it really, >> don't conflate it really, because they are they are different . different. >> patrick, imagine if a >> but patrick, imagine if a labour said that. labour mp said that. >> if a labour mp said >> imagine if a labour mp said that the jewish community. >> imagine if a labour mp said thwould the jewish community. >> imagine if a labour mp said thwould be he jewish community. >> imagine if a labour mp said thwould be anti—semitic1munity. >> imagine if a labour mp said thwould be anti—semitic and1ity. >> imagine if a labour mp said thwould be anti—semitic and we it would be anti—semitic and we would rightfully condemn that. >> but they'd have say >> but they'd have to say something thing like, well, >> but they'd have to say something thing like, well , what something thing like, well, what extreme israeli extremists or jewish extremists are in charge

of britain now? >> but i just want that would be an anti—semitic trope . an anti—semitic trope. >> and i think that, you know, talking about islamist are in charge of britain now, is making it look and is actually complimenting some of the things that she's about invasions that she's said about invasions and just this inflammatory, horrible language. >> i no, agree >> no, i mean, i no, i agree with johanna on this. it is so language very important. if language is very important. if you uke language is very important. if you like this and up it you up it like this and up it like exaggerate, you've like this and exaggerate, you've then got to say when then got nothing to say when things are really serious. >> well, okay. fine. look, those are obviously all really serious . final. . let's go on. final. >> final point things are really serious. >> i mean, yes, okay, maybe we're all being we're we're we've been knocked into submission. >> i feel that. >> i don't feel that. >> i don't feel that. >> mean, i think what happened >> i mean, i think what happened in parliament recently is pretty pretty pretty concerning pretty poor pretty concerning poor concerning. >> it's just desperate to >> yeah. it's just desperate to be the next leader . be the next leader. >> is that submission? well it seems me it's somewhere along seems to me it's somewhere along that path. seems to me it's somewhere along tha she's. seems to me it's somewhere along tha she's desperate to be the >> she's desperate to be the next and just next leader and she's just clutching at straws for anything. point, all anything. at this point, all right, interesting. right, look, it's interesting. >> tell, i know >> time will tell, but i know there are a lot of people out

there, and there a lot of there, and there are a lot of people who watch this show who are incredibly, incredibly concerned as though concerned and do feel as though that some kind of that there is some kind of radical takeover in place, and that those people who are extremists, are extremists, extremists, who are extremists, as said right at start, as i've said right at the start, monologue there are monologue there they are very clear they clear about the fact that they want to take whether or not want to take her, whether or not they'll allowed to they'll be allowed to is a different kettle of fish, but they clear about the they are very clear about the fact that they want to. so anyway, there we look are anyway, there we go. look are slightly different happy slightly different now. happy mondays former tour manager pleaded this pleaded his innocence on this show so regular show this week, so regular viewers listeners of this viewers and listeners of this show know who guy is. show will know who this guy is. he being accused of an £80 he was being accused of an £80 million smuggling plot. million cocaine smuggling plot. well, court yesterday well, he was in court yesterday and verdict has been made. and the verdict has been made. will reveal all very shortly. but could prince harry's book, 'spare' come back to haunt him? we the only tv channel we will be the only tv channel giving you live updates of prince harry's drugs court case in but up next the in america. but up next in the head with filmmaker head to head with filmmaker andrew drury, who has met shamima begum , spent quite a bit shamima begum, spent quite a bit of time with her human of time with her and human rights well . um, were rights lawyer as well. um, were were the courts right to block

shamima begum return to the uk? that's going to be our question this is patrick christys night and we're only on .

sunday mornings from 930 on gb news . news. news. news. >> this is patrick christys tonight. we're only on gb news andifs tonight. we're only on gb news and it's time now for our head to head . wow shamima begum has to head. wow shamima begum has lost her latest appeal to

overturn the uk government's decision that removed her british citizenship. so begum's lawyers argue that the home office were acting unlawfully, partly because of their failure to consider the now 24 year old as a potential victim of trafficking . while the court of trafficking. while the court of appeal say that begum must now stay in syria for these reasons, we unanimously dismiss the appeal. >> it could be argued that the decision in miss begum's case was harsh . it could also be was harsh. it could also be argued that miss begum is the author of her own misfortune . author of her own misfortune. >> it certainly could. now responding to the court's decision, the home office said it was pleased. well, this is how begum solicitors reacted. we are going to keep fighting. >> i want to say that i'm sorry to shamima and to her family that after five years of fighting, she still hasn't received justice in a british court . and to promise her and to

court. and to promise her and to promise the government that we're not going to stop fighting. >> it says that the core factual history remains the same as a 15 year old british child . she was year old british child. she was lured, encouraged and deceived for the purposes of sexual exploitation. do you buy that? joining us today to discuss this verdict is human rights lawyer shoaib khan , and a man who spent shoaib khan, and a man who spent two years working with and in and around shamima begum, which is filmmaker andrew drury. shapps. thank you very, very much. and andrew, i'll start with you. so you, you know shamima better than frankly, most most people. okay. yeah do you think she should be coming home. >> no. >> no. >> quite factually no. >> quite factually no. >> because i know her as a person. i spent say two years. >> i gave her an opportunity at the beginning . the beginning. >> um, i worked a character out and by the time that i left and the last time i spoke to her. no, not sure she's a manipulator there. >> could you could you just expand on that a bit before we

go to show of this, what you mean by manipulator? go to show of this, what you me well, manipulator? go to show of this, what you me well, when bulator? go to show of this, what you me well, when i lator? go to show of this, what you me well, when i first? her, >> well, when i first met her, she, i saw this kind of frightened little rabbit as a mare, kind of mare, and she was kind of apology for everything she'd done. she'd understand what she had um, and over had done. um, and then over a penod had done. um, and then over a period of time, through text messages sent me from the messages she sent to me from the camp, loads of visits, camp, um, and loads of visits, um, changed opinion. there um, i changed my opinion. there was, can let you know how was, if i can let you know how i changed my opinion. she had, um, three died. i had, um, three kids that died. i had, um, she showed me a picture from her purse. she out one this purse. she pulled out one this pictures her. a child with, pictures with her. a child with, like, chocolate her face. like, chocolate around her face. um, it kind of made me um, and it kind of made me a little bit sad. so when got little bit sad. so when i got back, sent a message home back, i sent a message home saying, i'm sorry, shamima. it really made me upset seeing your picture of dead children. picture of your dead children. she dont picture of your dead children. she don't worry about she said, don't worry about that, andrew. over now. that, andrew. i'm over that now. she showed empathy . she showed no empathy. >> all right . shoaib, >> um, okay. all right. shoaib, your your views on it then i think you think we should have her now. her back now. >> yes, of course . i mean, to be >> yes, of course. i mean, to be honest, i mean, i think that in terms of her personality, what she's a person, her she's like as a person, her character, i think that forms a

very, very small part of this whole of whole jigsaw whole saga, of this whole jigsaw . tiny part of . that's a really tiny part of it. doesn't really matter. it. it doesn't really matter. um, what she's done. if that's a crime, that's bad crime, that's a crime that's bad enough. i don't think we really need to be punishing her extra. um, know , is she nice um, you know, is she a nice person or you know, if she person or not? you know, if she at the time, know, she had at the time, you know, she had been about her children, been crying about her children, would back? i don't would we have her back? i don't think those things matter. anyway. is she anyway. the whole point is she was. is british. she was was. she is british. she was born the far as we born in the uk, as far as we know. and i think it's probably accepted now. she's never been to bangladesh. she's never been to, know, has no other to, you know, she has no other nationality. was british, nationality. she was british, born raised she born here, raised here. she became she here. yes became what she became here. yes you mean, to be honest, you know, i mean, to be honest, we even know, um, what we don't even know, um, what crimes committed. but crimes she has committed. but even we accept she's even to even if we accept she's committed heinous crimes. committed some heinous crimes. yes. lots people uk yes. lots of people in the uk have of the laws. have punished some of the laws. we. we treat them british. we. we treat them as british. so. yeah. mean, the point so. yeah. i mean, the point is, she should should be allowed she should she should be allowed back is her this back home this is her home. this is i'll that to you that you is i'll put that to you that you know, hey, lots of people in britain have committed heinous crimes. >> i'm sure sewing someone >> i'm not sure sewing someone into a suicide vest would count

as anyway, go on your view. >> well, what about the victims? i mean, we all apologise i mean, we hear all apologise about what about her. poor shamima. what about her. poor shamima. what about the victims in raqqa? what about the victims in raqqa? what about victims in syria that about the victims in syria that were what? was were fear of isis? what? she was part about she was part of? what about she was hisbah, morality police. hisbah, the morality police. what people she what about the people that she tortures involved? she's given fear to? what about those people? rights they people? what rights do they got? i all this of, um, you i hear all this sort of, um, you know, about bringing i hear all this sort of, um, you kno back. about bringing i hear all this sort of, um, you kno back. what about bringing i hear all this sort of, um, you kno back. what about those?g i hear all this sort of, um, you kno back. what about those? have her back. what about those? have you ever thought about the victims? she legitimised the victims? she she legitimised the bombing manchester. do you bombing of manchester. do you really somebody that really want somebody like that back walking your back walking around your streets? so i again, i'm again. >> i don't understand i mean, in terms of we're talking about the, the victims and firstly, i mean , i don't think i ever said mean, i don't think i ever said there's very few, people who there's very few, few people who would shamima, that's would say, shamima, that's not the point is was the point. the point is she was british. bangladeshi. the point. the point is she was britisshould bangladeshi. the point. the point is she was britisshould bangladeshis. the point. the point is she was britisshould bangladeshis have why should the bangladeshis have her? i mean, if we're saying, you know, she is stateless. you know, no, she is stateless. if admit she's going to, if we admit that she's going to, you stay in a syrian camp, you know, stay in a syrian camp, that's what she should. that's a different thing. but people different thing. but for people who not stateless and who say she's not stateless and she to bangladesh, that's she goes to bangladesh, that's

complete would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, just would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, just to would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, just to get would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, just to get to would you. she goes to bangladesh, that's conyeah, just to get to the|ld you. >> yeah, just to get to the bottom of that, then. so would you happy for her to stay you be happy for her to stay where is then? because it's where she is then? because it's not actually just as not it's not actually just as binary a choice as well. it's britain or bangladesh. mean, britain or bangladesh. i mean, she somewhere else. she is currently somewhere else. she stay or she could just stay there. or are desperate have her are you desperate to have her back here? >> i'm not desperate to have her back, i that's right. back, but i think that's right. i think a citizenship should not back, but i think that's right. i tihave| citizenship should not back, but i think that's right. i tihave beenanship should not back, but i think that's right. i tihave been revoked. ould not back, but i think that's right. i tihave been revoked. iuld not back, but i think that's right. i tihave been revoked. i think»t be have been revoked. i think that's medieval concept, that's quite a medieval concept, you banishing or exiling you know, banishing or exiling people. a civilised society doesn't do that. we punish people. court what people. we prove in court what they've done. we lock them up. some people up. people some people we lock up. people die prison in uk, we die in prison in the uk, we still don't, you know, we don't push the or push push them into the ocean or push them the cliffs of dover, or them off the cliffs of dover, or push them into another country. you know, that's not what do. you know, that's not what we do. we used do that centuries we used to do that centuries ago. criminals off ago. send all the criminals off to aiden. we to another prison. aiden. we don't that anymore. we don't do that anymore. we shouldn't that with shouldn't do that with her. >> i the criminal in >> but, i mean, the criminal in this case, andrew, sent herself off to an island. and so can i just andrew, a couple just ask you, andrew, a couple of this. so a lot of of points on this. so a lot of people say, oh, look, she was she was only 15 at the time. a

lot of those people, by the way, seems to be crossover in the seems to be a crossover in the venn between those venn diagram between those people votes 16 people who want votes for 16 year olds and people who are simultaneously claiming shamima didn't was doing, simultaneously claiming shamima didthe was doing, simultaneously claiming shamima didthe but was doing, simultaneously claiming shamima didthe but we; doing, simultaneously claiming shamima didthe but we go.ing, simultaneously claiming shamima didthe but we go. um, by the way. but there we go. um, and will say she was and people will say she was a child and people will say that obviously our obviously she's our responsibility now and that she can de—radicalised. your responsibility now and that she can one—radicalised. your responsibility now and that she can on that? calised. your views on that? >> according her, she >> well, according to her, she has been de—radicalised by herself. think been herself. um, i think she's been there for a fact. there too long, um, for a fact. and one point i like to make about her coming home, we don't have that choice anyway, because there's possibility there's a good possibility she. she'll justice in syria. she'll face a justice in syria. she'll face a justice in syria. she could would imagine their she'll face a justice in syria. she csystem.ould imagine their she'll face a justice in syria. she csystem. um, imagine their she'll face a justice in syria. she csystem. um, um,]ine their she'll face a justice in syria. she csystem. um, um, she'llieir court system. um, um, she'll face over there and could face trial over there and could be sentenced to about 20 years over anyway so i don't over there. anyway so i don't think option. the think we have that option. the citizenship citizenship citizenship given us citizenship doesn't home. doesn't mean she's coming home. it she's in a it just means that she's in a syrian as a british citizen syrian camp as a british citizen . um, and she certainly knew what she was doing when she went there. that 15 i've heard that 15 age 15 talk. so many times. she was a break, intelligent, a star student . she knew exactly star student. she knew exactly what she was doing . she lived in

what she was doing. she lived in an islamic community. she knew what isis stood for. she went there with an open mind and i hear about all this, that she was trafficked. she never once said she was trafficked. there was four girls got together and decided was going to. decided they was going to. that's going to do. >> so when you were talking to her, andrew. yeah. was she saying i trafficked saying things? i was trafficked for sexual exploitation. was she saying that to you? >> no. she said that when she got to syria, got a choice got to syria, she got a choice of husband. know, know, of husband. i know, you know, you could that was being you could say that was being trafficked, actually trafficked, but she actually loved her husband. so when i first met her, she showed me happy pictures her and happy pictures of her, her and her know you're her husband. i know you're shaking head, but that's shaking your head, but that's what told me. i've met her. what she told me. i've met her. you haven't? she told me she loved him and she continued that conversation months conversation for 3 or 4 months after was only after we meeting. it was only when was schooled by the when she was schooled by the other girls in the prison. she said he mentally abused her, so she all along said he mentally abused her, so sh

other british girl, 15 year old, living with a 23 year living happily with a 23 year old man? say that's a happy old man? we'd say that's a happy marriage. doesn't have to marriage. she doesn't have to say she is. if she is a child for living man, having for living with a man, having sex, having babies with a man, we say that sexual we would say that sexual exploitation, under 18, exploitation, if she's under 18, she doesn't tell she is. she doesn't have to tell us that. why is it different us that. so why is it different for woman? i really don't for this woman? i really don't understand point. she understand this point. she was happy this man. what does happy with this man. what does that even mean? >> a 15 year old? that woman is her choice. made that choice. >> that is not choice in the >> that is not a choice in the uk. is not a choice under uk. that is not a choice under 18. you cannot consent. >> she wasn't in the uk when she got her choice. got married. it was her choice. she the so the law she left the uk so the law shouldn't be. >> sorry but that's such a ridiculous thing to say. isn't that ridiculous? she left. all child grooming victims are happy . how do you know she was groomed ? groomed? >> what evidence have you got of grooming? tell me. your evidence of . of her being groomed. >> the evidence was she was a 16 year old with a baby that is all the evidence we need. there's no evidence that she was trafficked. >> there was no evidence she was groomed. >> yeah, fair. sure. >> yeah, to be fair. sure. i

mean, what is the age of consent in syria? >> sorry. why are we talking about syria? she was british at the time. from british the time. she went from british was in. >> she over there, though, >> she was over there, though, wasn't she? >> that we deal with >> is that how we deal with paedophilia or other cases? a paedophilia or other cases? if a british goes to syria and british man goes to syria and has, know, a child with a 15 has, you know, a child with a 15 year syrian, that's fine, year old syrian, that's fine, because he's syria of course because he's in syria of course it law in the place, it is the law in the place, doesn't it? >> no, it doesn't. 15 i've just been told my apparently been told in my ear, apparently the in syria is the age of consent in syria is 15 and so many paedophiles we do bnng 15 and so many paedophiles we do bring punish them here bring back and punish them here because we treat them according to our laws. >> 5 seem gum-m >> not that you seem to be forgetting point that she forgetting the point that she went there was nobody's fault. >> there. >> she went there. >> she went there. >> so just to clarify the trafficking has been trafficking point, it has been the have accepted she was the courts have accepted she was the courts have accepted she was the trafficking. even the victim of trafficking. even the victim of trafficking. even the excuse just just. >> yeah. okay um, i'm i'm quite keen to the bottom of keen to get to the bottom of this shoaib bashir. who this as well. shoaib bashir. who is paying for her appeals, a constant is . constant appeals is. >> don't know, but i'm assuming she's probably getting legal aid. would be aid. yeah, it would probably be the i would the british taxpayer, i would assume. by reprieve, a assume. also by reprieve, a charitable organisation .

charitable organisation. >> right. so it's a combination. so it's a combination of we think what we think the british taxpayer and a french organisation are are paying for it. um, right. gosh okay. look chaps, thank you very much. it's a cracking head to head. it's exactly what we wanted. so we'll have to get you back on and do this next time she launches an appeal. probably. that is, of course, lawyer course, the human rights lawyer shoaib and the who course, the human rights lawyer shoaiia and the who course, the human rights lawyer shoaiia couple|d the who course, the human rights lawyer shoaiia couple ofthe who course, the human rights lawyer shoaiia couple of years who course, the human rights lawyer shoaiia couple of years working spent a couple of years working around shamima begum. there is the drury. look the filmmaker andrew drury. look who do you agree with? okay, so did court of appeal make the did the court of appeal make the right decision? martin on x says yes. last yes. hopefully that is the last we of shamima begum. we ever hear of shamima begum. martin, to it to martin, i hate to break it to you, mate. it won't be. but jackie also says no, she was born, and schooled here. born, raised and schooled here. she have repatriate she should have been repatriate to court to face british court proceedings. view is in proceedings. now your view is in shock 95% agree shock horror. 95% of you agree that the of appeal made that the court of appeal made the right decision. 5% of you say they made the wrong one. look coming up, we've got a little bit more shamima for you because i'm going be talking because i'm going to be talking to family's law lawyer,

to her family's law lawyer, tasnime akunjee. so we'll find out first hand. really he's talking exclusively to us here on gb news. so we're keen to get his view. another one for you is co—founder of just stop oil. wants to protest, wants you to protest outside her house. essentially she courted a lot of controversy by essentially saying that it's for okay people to protest outside politicians houses. to protest outside politicians houses . and she apparently houses. and now she apparently has outside hers. has welcomed it outside hers. she's live in the studio shortly . prince harry's book . now, will prince harry's book spam back to haunt him? we spam come back to haunt him? we speak man who has lodged speak to the man who has lodged an for the duke an appeal calling for the duke of visa application of sussex's visa application to be public. it's be made public. of course, it's all in relation to whether or not he lied about taking drugs. we're the only news outlet bringing you tonight. we're the only news outlet bringearlier you tonight. we're the only news outlet bringearlier this you tonight. we're the only news outlet bringearlier this week onight. we're the only news outlet bringearlier this week wejht. we're the only news outlet bringearlier this week we spoke and earlier this week we spoke to former happy mondays tour manager murray. was manager anthony murray. he was up manager anthony murray. he was up trial for an £80 million up on trial for an £80 million cocaine haul charge in turkey. did the court find him innocent or guilty? i will reveal all next. it's patrick christys tonight. we're on

little bit of banter as well. anywhere else. >> breakfast with eamonn and isabel monday to thursday . isabel monday to thursday. >> welcome back. now coming up, the co—founder of just up oil joins me live to explain why she would be happy for someone to protest outside her home. but first, former happy mondays tour manager anthony murray has been fighting for his life after being accused of playing a role in an £80 million cocaine bust. now his life has been on hold since his arrest in october 2020, with the risk of a 55 year prison sentence in a turkish

jail looming over his head. prison sentence in a turkish jail looming over his head . so jail looming over his head. so regular viewers and listeners to this show might remember. i spoke to anthony a little earlier this week ahead of this hearing. any previous convictions? yeah, quite a few. >> yes . yeah. but not for >> yes. yeah. but not for cocaine, not for 250 kilo. >> and he obviously made it incredibly clear that he wanted to clear his name at the trial yesterday . yesterday. >> my name. everyone says this. why are you going back? i want to go back. i need to be clear. >> well, since then , anthony has >> well, since then, anthony has cleared his name and he intends to have a hell of a party to celebrate. apparently, i'm delighted to be joined now by anthony murray himself. anthony you must be delighted. right mirabelle? right i'll be honest with you . with you. >> yeah, i lost a tenner on this. >> okay . >> okay. >> okay. >> i won a few tenners. let me tell you. right. >> so look how. well, no . how >> so look how. well, no. how did you get off it? go on. obviously you didn't do it, so there's that. but what what did you on? because you you said you went to turkey with your

daughter to get her teeth done, and then. yes, you ended up completely being completely coincidentally being shown round turkey by someone who with the coke who was involved with the coke trade or something. go on. what happened? >> so i got introduced to this quy- >> so i got introduced to this guy. he said from a friend in manchester, said, if you go to sumbul, my friend will take you round. he's got daughters, same age as your daughter to look after or their um, so we after you or get their um, so we went and i phoned him. he come to see us, he took us out. this was for a few weeks, was it went on for a few weeks, about six weeks because i was having i had some dental work done.i having i had some dental work done. i got infection. i had done. i got an infection. i had to uh, the are to stay. uh, the police are watching his group. so watching him and his group. so i'm meals with this i'm having meals with this group. they're speaking group. but they're speaking turkish. i don't what they turkish. i don't know what they speaking. i don't speak turkish. um, the police are all around videoing, watching i get videoing, watching it. uh, i get called antonio because it's easy to uh to pronounce. uh there's a colombian involved the colombian involved in the gang who's they who's called antonio, but they don't he is. you never don't know who he is. you never see they pick up on me see him, so they pick up on me and it's me and then i get and say it's me and then i get nick to put in the jail. and nick to get put in the jail. and i've been fighting since then. three and a half years and so on thursday, a new judge.

thursday, i had a new judge. i flies in and, uh, he's there for three hours. he gives my name and stands up to say, um, what's going on in turkish? i keep reading, looking at the lawyers to read his face a little bit worried now, usual, worried now, again, as usual, because i'm thinking it could end. we'll be back the jail. end. we'll be back to the jail. and the girl and the interpreter, the girl looks at me, smiles and goes, you've so you've got not guilty. so i asked her twice. i said, what did you i'm still looking did you say? i'm still looking at lawyer. he's not. there's at the lawyer. he's not. there's no expression on his face. the judge looking at me, puts his judge is looking at me, puts his thumb up, of puts his faux thumb up, kind of puts his faux pas, the up. so i pas, picks the paper up. so i said are you sure she said again, are you sure she said, yeah. of the said, yeah. one of the co—defendants me said, co—defendants behind me said, well you're going well done, you're going home. um, that was i to um, and that was it. i had to sit for another two hours sit there for another two hours before could get released from before i could get released from the court. and, uh, and that was it. i was straight to the airport. straight to northern cyprus. businesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm businesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm hereisinesswoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, swoman airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, and nan airport. straight to northern cypri'm here now, and n'can and i'm here now, and i can finish my book because i've written book when i was in written a book when i was in there. didn't have the there. but we didn't have the end in. so now had an happy end in. so now i had an happy ending yesterday done. ending yesterday and it's done. i've ending for the i've got the ending for the book, we look massive. book, so we look massive. >> congrats! you must be

probably the most relieved man >> congrats! you must be pr> congrats! you must be pr> congrats! you must be pr> congrats! you must be pr> congrats! you must be pr> congrats! you must be pr> yeah. so ryder and >> yeah. so? so shaun, ryder and bez in touch, then straight bez been in touch, then straight away, day. bez been in touch, then straight awesean'siay. bez been in touch, then straight awesean's on the phone all day. >> sean's on the phone all day. ringing was in ringing me up while i was in court, but i had to keep blanking the call. uh, bez rang as well yesterday, so i'm going back uk soon. uh, i'll back to the uk soon. uh, i'll hook with sean and bez, do hook up with sean and bez, do some photographs. got a bit some photographs. i've got a bit of to they're going of touring to do. they're going to promote the book. um, to help me promote the book. um, and so, yeah, we're ready to party all 24 party now. it's all 24 hour party now. it's all 24 hour party back. we're back on. >> this is it. you're back in the game, mate. >> back in. i'm back in the game. literally. i'm back in the game. >> absolutely. >> absolutely. >> well, look, i mean well done. can just when you so when

can i just say when you so when you there then you you you were there then you you because you actually flew from tel to turkey. last tel aviv to turkey. and the last time you, i said to you, time i saw you, i said to you, look, why on earth are you doing this right? because there's any extradition turkey. you just israel and turkey. and you just said, look, you want to go and clear your i thought you clear your name. i thought you were for that. i'd were mad for doing that. i'd have stayed. >> everybody did. >> everybody did. >> yeah, patrick. >> yeah, patrick. >> everybody but i need to >> everybody did. but i need to travel. like travelling, travel. i like travelling, and i can't know? i can can't go. you know? i can travel. to be legal. the travel. it has to be legal. the way i'm travelling. i like to do what doing. you know? what i'm doing. you know? i don't to looking for don't want to be looking for them my back all the way. them over my back all the way. that's true. um. and i don't want live in israel the rest want to live in israel the rest of my life, or south america or nonh of my life, or south america or north korea. was about to get north korea. i was about to get to but had the to north korea, but we had the pandemic i couldn't get pandemic on, so i couldn't get down but been like down there. but it's been like that. it's been touch and go. whether go back, you know, whether to go back, you know, i don't a turkish don't want to die in a turkish jail. uh, even though like jail. uh, even though it's like being on the happy mondays tour, but that's the but in that jail, that's the only reason i could survive that. it the dressing room that. it was the dressing room was as that prison was the same as that prison cell, me you. cell, let me tell you. >> oh, right. right. cell, let me tell you. >> so, right. right. cell, let me tell you. >> so go;ht. right. cell, let me tell you. >> so go on. right. cell, let me tell you. >> so go on. juslil. cell, let me tell you. >> so go on. just describe to me

what kind party you're what kind of party you're going to be having when you when you, when get back. when you get back. >> oh, it's going to lasted about month. the about a month. it'll be the headlines. they'll make the headunes headlines. they'll make the headlines along headlines and you can come along as well. you come and join us. >> tell you, and we'll you as well. you come and join us. >>london.ou, and we'll you in london. >> could i can sense falling >> i could i can sense falling off fast approaching here. >> e sure. listen forget >> oh for sure. listen forget the that's for the yean >> e- e" >> all right. well, thank you very to you, >> all right. well, thank you very and to you, >> all right. well, thank you very and well to you, >> all right. well, thank you very and well done to you, >> all right. well, thank you very and well done as you, >> all right. well, thank you very and well done as well. mate. and well done as well. a pleasure to check in with you. thank much, anthony murray. >> anyone else? >> oh, anyone else? >> oh, anyone else? >> else think that would >> anyone else think that would happen? >> anyone else think that would happdone. enough. well done. fair enough. anyway coming shifting tone now. coming up are shifting tone now. more and the more on shamima begum and the ruling she will ruling that says that she will not uk citizenship. not regain her uk citizenship. we to shamima we will be speaking to shamima bigham's lawyer, bigham's family's lawyer, tasnime akunjee, exclusively here on and will prince here on gb news. and will prince harry's book, 'spare' come back to haunt him? we speak to the man lodged an appeal calling man who lodged an appeal calling for the duke sussex's visa for the duke of sussex's visa application made public, application to be made public, and about taking and whether he lied about taking drugs. but co—founder of drugs. but next co—founder of just stop oil wants you to protest outside her house. apparently, she's live on the show next, we explain exactly what's going on. it's patrick christys tonight are only christys tonight and we are only

on

gb news. all right, welcome back. so the co—founder of just stop oil, sarah lunnon, revealed on bbc radio four that she would be delighted if activists peacefully protested outside her home in defence of protests taking place outside mps home. so this comes following fresh concerns. obviously over mps safety and the home of tobias ellwood being targeted by pro—palestine protesters just last week. so sarah london did face quite a lot of backlash on wednesday for her opinion piece in the guardian, calling out

labour for not standing up to the finance sector and right wing think tanks . well pleased wing think tanks. well pleased to say that she joins me now. sarah, thank you very much . sarah, thank you very much. could you clarify a couple of things for us then? so you do you think that more people should protest outside mps homes . uh do i think more people should ? should? >> um , no. no not no. >> um, no. no not no. >>— >> um, no. no not no. >> but but you think it's to okay do that, though? yeah. >> i say, patrick. uh, yeah. i've got really bad delay on on this line. uh, yeah. it's i've got really bad delay on on this line. uh, yeah . it's really this line. uh, yeah. it's really weird. sorry uh, do i do i think more people should protest outside people's homes. i'm not calling for that to happen . no. calling for that to happen. no. i'm not. so >> but do you think that protest rights are okay outside mps homes . homes. >> i think we and you might even agree with me on on this. i

think our politics is failing . think our politics is failing. us right. like i, i have not met a single person when i say, hey, you know, is a political system working for you? are you getting what you like you what you want? do you like you know , i do trust the people know, i do you trust the people you're voting for? i haven't heard one person say, yeah to me. yeah, it's really working . i me. yeah, it's really working. i feel really heard. and i think what we're saying in these protest outs that are happening at mps offices at, at homes, is that people need to be heard. they want to be heard, and they're not being heard. >> yeah. and is there a line? >> yeah. and is there a line? >> is there a line though? sarah because this is the thing, you know, obviously you guys could run for political office yourselves. try to get yourselves. you could try to get into parliament. try into parliament. you could try to change. everyone to force that change. everyone knows kind cause that you knows the kind of cause that you for there a line for. stand is there not a line when got mps at home, when you've got mps at home, maybe with young children, with partners, etc? you know, that's i mean, if the mafia did that, we'd be calling it out, wouldn't

we? >> oh well, yeah , we would. and >> oh well, yeah, we would. and you're right, you know, there there is a line in all of this stuff. and when you're taking these kinds of actions, you have to be really very, very careful about , uh, about what you're about, uh, about what you're doing. i'm you know, i'm not advocating for, for, for people to turn up huge numbers of people to turn up. you know, i, i think if you're going to do this, you have to do it in a very careful, considered way. you know, you do have to take care. absolutely but people are dnven care. absolutely but people are driven to doing this kind of stuff because our politics is failing. you know? so we need to do something else and we need our politicians to address it. and i have to say that actually , and i have to say that actually, if anyone does come outside my home, it's not going to be much fun. it's going to be cups of tea. and i think you've been ianed tea. and i think you've been invited to a much more interesting on interesting party earlier on that's happen outside interesting party earlier on tha'front happen outside interesting party earlier on tha'front door happen outside interesting party earlier on tha'front door. happen outside my front door. >> yeah. i mean, i did wonder whether or not. so some people who were delayed and held up by

a variety of different just stop oil protests , people had said oil protests, people had said that they wives in labour. that they had wives in labour. somebody anyway that somebody claimed anyway that their mother was having a stroke, for example, and they couldn't get to the hospital. i imagine a lot of those people would angry would remain very, very angry with just stop oil and you are one of the co—founders of it. i mean, would you really be okay with those people banging on your front door saying to you, your front door saying to you, you know, you killed my mum ? you know, you killed my mum? >> it would obviously be very, very difficult if that happened. you know ? so yeah, that that you know? so yeah, that that would be really difficult. and those people are rightly upset. of course they are. so, um , but of course they are. so, um, but would they have a right to do that? i do believe they would have a right to come and talk to me. of course . yeah, i do, i do me. of course. yeah, i do, i do believe that. >> okay. so i mean, is this is this i'm just wondering if it's a slightly dangerous precedent to set because, you know , people to set because, you know, people might take that. people might

take that to extreme. i mean, you don't know who you're going to you know, saying, oh, to get. you know, saying, oh, it's right to there are to get. you know, saying, oh, it lot right to there are to get. you know, saying, oh, it lot rpeople there are to get. you know, saying, oh, it lot rpeople that'here are to get. you know, saying, oh, it lot rpeople that'h speaks a lot of people that i speak to or spoken to from just stop or have spoken to from just stop oil, understand they are, oil, who i understand they are, you absolutely , you know, absolutely, absolutely, about absolutely, really adamant about the climate crisis and all of this and i get if this stuff. and i get that if you if you get locked into that mentally that it mentally that you think that it can lot of extreme can legitimise a lot of extreme action. i understand that, action. and i understand that, but i wonder whether not some but i wonder whether or not some of maybe are of those people maybe are actually quite vulnerable and if they see the green light to they then see the green light to go to mps house, and if you go to an mps house, and if you think of world is think the end of the world is coming, action is coming, then any action is legitimised, really ? legitimised, isn't it really? after that, you not after that, are you not concerned might concerned that you might end up having yourself in having to explain yourself in that at some point for that regard at some point for the someone else ? the actions of someone else? >> so, patrick, you make a really good point. and that's why we have this , um, absolute why we have this, um, absolute ethos of non—violence . so if ethos of non—violence. so if anybody comes to act and take action with just stop oil, we have a whole suite of training so that people understand what it means to take action and what

they need to do. >> can i come to the training ? >> can i come to the training? >> can i come to the training? >> yeah , that would be great. >> yeah, that would be great. >> yeah, that would be great. >> i'd love to see that. >>— >> i'd love to see that. >> i'd love to see that. >> i'd really i'd really like to see that. >> i would really love to come and know, behind the and see, you know, behind the curtain ball, it's curtain of just a ball, if it's possible . possible. >> date . >> it's a date. >> it's a date. >> all right. >> all right. >> okay. well it's a friday night and i've got a date. so look. all right. thank you. thank you very much. and you know, really interesting to talk to before go, to you. oh, go on, before i go, like your point about standing for elections. >> quickly um, so , so right >> yes. quickly um, so, so right now hundreds of people are actually getting in touch with just stop oil because of the piece in the guardian about standing independent candidates, about supporting them , and they about supporting them, and they are getting in touch about doing that. so you know, for those people who do think politics is failing them , that i think there failing them, that i think there is going to be an alternative of. >> all right. okay. >> all right. okay. >> well , >> all right. okay. >> well, interesting. sarah, look, thank you much . sarah look, thank you very much. sarah london there. um, just talking to us a bit about why she's happy protest happy for people to protest

outside look, outside her own home. look, coming up, will prince harry's book, 'spare' come to haunt book, 'spare' come back to haunt him? appeal him? there is an appeal at the moment court about moment going on in court about whether about whether or not he lied about drugs on visa application. drugs on his visa application. okay, that hearing is okay, we are that hearing is literally just finished. we will have live reaction from it. we're only news channel we're the only news channel doing that for you tonight and nigel just given nigel farage has just given a speak cpac in the us. we will speak at cpac in the us. we will get on what he said. get the latest on what he said. but next more shamima begum. but next more on shamima begum. because exclusive because we've got an exclusive with , family with shamima begum, family lawyer. so stay tuned . lawyer. so stay tuned. >> for that warm feeling inside . >> for that warm feeling inside. died from boxt boilers sponsors of weather on . gb news. of weather on. gb news. >> good evening. welcome to your latest gb news weather update with me annie from the met office. it will be a chilly start to the weekend. will start to the weekend. there will be early sunshine though be some early sunshine though with showers with a risk of showers developing in the afternoon . low developing in the afternoon. low pressure in charge pressure has been in charge through today will slowly through today that will slowly start to fill, bringing us a slightly more settled evening and saturday so any showers

through the day will tend to fade away through the course of the night, but they will still persist across western persist across some western coasts and across the far south—east as well, where it could be breezy overnight . could be quite breezy overnight. elsewhere, though, it will be a clear calm and dry night, so clear and calm and dry night, so temperatures will away, so temperatures will drop away, so it's be a cold it's likely to be quite a cold start day on saturday, so start to the day on saturday, so frost potentially some icy patches and also some mist and fog by tomorrow morning that should lift and clear by mid—morning and many areas will see a dry and bright day through saturday. the best of the sunshine will definitely be through the morning. cloud will bubble up into lunchtime and into allowing into the afternoon, allowing a few develop. these few showers to develop. these should be fairly few and far between and they will be quite light if you do get caught in one in the sunshine, it will be feeling pleasant well feeling fairly pleasant as well with winds will be with those light winds will be another start to the day on another cold start to the day on sunday, across northern sunday, but across northern areas should dry areas it should stay dry and bright through much of the day. in though, quite in the south, though, quite a different some quite different story with some quite persistent wet weather set to arrive across southern areas of

england, into parts of england, possibly into parts of south two turns up south wales. two turns dry up more widely once again on monday before further wet weather arrives the north tuesday . arrives in the north on tuesday. see you later, looks like things are heating up . are heating up. >> boxt boilers spotty of weather on

well -- well . it's 10 pm. i'm patrick well. it's 10 pm. i'm patrick christys tonight that we unanimously dismiss the appeal .

unanimously dismiss the appeal. >> shamima begum's family lawyer is live next. plus of course, i had been doing cocaine around this time , but someone's country this time, but someone's country house. we are the only news outlet telling you the very latest about prince harry's drugs court case today. in fact, it has literal just finished. so we'll be talking to a man who was there . nigel farage has been was there. nigel farage has been talking in washington going to get donald trump back elected . get donald trump back elected. >> and in the white house. farage predicts a white house return for donald trump reaction later this hour. >> i'll have all of tomorrow's newspaper front pages today with director of the popular conservatives. it's mark littlewood , apprentice finalist littlewood, apprentice finalist joanna jarjue , an ex bbc joanna jarjue, an ex bbc political chief. john sergeant and can you tell what's wrong . here? >> thanks for your advice . >> thanks for your advice. >> thanks for your advice. >> get ready britain here we go.

an exclusive with shamima begum's family lawyer. next. >> good evening . begum's family lawyer. next. >> good evening. i'm begum's family lawyer. next. >> good evening . i'm ray addison >> good evening. i'm ray addison in the gb newsroom room, and we start with some breaking news. just stop oil says it has disrupted labour mp anneliese dodds fundraising dinner in oxford during the protests. they delivered a request that the labour frontbencher pledges to leave the labour party within six months if the party fails to cancel all tory oil and gas licences granted after 2021. this is a developing story and we'll bring you more as we get it. well, police have confirmed three children whose bodies were found at a home in bristol died from knife injuries. seven year old farrah's three year old jewry and nine month old mohammed bash were found in the

sea mills area on sunday. the 42 year old woman, arrested on suspicion of their murder remains in hospital and is being treated for non—life threatening injuries . a vigil is being held injuries. a vigil is being held injuries. a vigil is being held in memory of the children tonight . in memory of the children tonight. former post in memory of the children tonight . former post office tonight. former post office chief executive paula vennells has been stripped of her cbe by the king following the horizon it scandal . the king following the horizon it scandal. she was the king following the horizon it scandal . she was heavily it scandal. she was heavily criticised for routinely denying any problems with the system, which led to the wrongful prosecution of hundreds of subpostmaster hours. she received the honour in 2018 and announced that she planned to handit announced that she planned to hand it back with immediate effect. last month . she'll now effect. last month. she'll now formally lose the title for bringing the honours system into disrepute . an unexploded second disrepute. an unexploded second world war bomb found in plymouth has now been successfully taken out to sea, and police say it will be detonated within 24 hours. the 500 kilogram device was found in a garden in cheam and lifted onto a military vehicle. 10,000 residents have

now been allowed to return to their homes after they were evacuated. local mp johnny mercer has thanked emergency responders who worked around the clock . well, a high altitude clock. well, a high altitude balloon has reportedly been detected flying over the united states. us officials have told news outlets that it was spotted by military aircraft over colorado in the west of the country , and is drifting country, and is drifting eastwards in the jet stream. its origin and its purpose is still unknown, but it's not thought to present a threat. of course, it comes a year after a chinese spy balloon flew over the continental us for several days , continental us for several days, nigel farage says the 2024 us election affects the safety of the world. the gb news presenter was speaking at the conservative political action conference just outside washington , dc, where he outside washington, dc, where he urged delegates to support donald trump. he cited the uk's recent pro—palestine protests and claimed that an extremist

fringe is now threatening our democracy . democracy. >> and now we see british politician . as cowed. skp shared politician. as cowed. skp shared they were even scared to leave they were even scared to leave the building on wednesday and thursday evenings because we've forgotten we we've forgotten who we are. we've forgotten who we are. we've forgotten what we are we've forgotten what we are and we've allowed an extremist fringe to bully us and threaten our very democracy . and that is why we democracy. and that is why we need strong leaders. that's why we need leaders of conviction . we need leaders of conviction. it's why you in america , and we it's why you in america, and we in the world need trump back in that white house >> and finally, the king has been pictured looking through thousands of cards sent by well—wishers sitting at a desk in buckingham palace. king charles can be seen laughing at one card which shows a disgruntled dog recovering from treatment . the king disgruntled dog recovering from treatment. the king has disgruntled dog recovering from treatment . the king has received treatment. the king has received 7000 messages of support from around the world since his cancer diagnosis. many have also

shared their own experience of cancen shared their own experience of cancer, with one telling him remain positive and don't let it get you down. well for the latest stories, sign up to gb news alerts by scanning the qr code that's on your screen right now, or go to gb news .com/ alerts. now straight back to . alerts. now straight back to. patrick. so shamima begum has lost her appeal against the removal of british citizen ship. >> for these reasons , as we >> for these reasons, as we unanimously dismiss the appeal, it could be argued that the decision in miss begum's case was was harsh. it could also be argued that miss begum is the author of her own misfortune . author of her own misfortune. >> in the now 24 year old travelled to syria in 2015 at the age of 15. before her citizenship was revoked on national security grounds. but her legal team has promised that

they will keep fighting. we are going to keep fighting, i want to say that i'm sorry to shamima and to her family that after five years of fighting, she still hasn't received justice in a british court and to promise her and to promise the government that we're not going to stop fighting . so an official to stop fighting. so an official statement from her lawyers says that the core factual history remains the same. so they say this as a 15 year old british child , she was lured, encouraged child, she was lured, encouraged and deceived for the purposes of sexual exploitation. so from the woman who drastically changed her image from a headscarf, etc. to the baseball cap, who is the person really beneath the headwear? i'm joined now by shamima begum's family lawyer , shamima begum's family lawyer, tasnime akunjee. thank very tasnime akunjee. thank you very much . and i'm going go to my much. and i'm going to go to my panel afterwards. right panel on this afterwards. right so keen your so i'm just keen to get your your a bit of an your take on it and a bit of an inside story really. um, how are her family then? what are they making this? they making of all of this? is they saying the fight is going to carry saying the fight is going to car|well, mean, they've been

>> well, i mean, they've been through for the through this process for the last with highs and last five years with highs and lows . a previous court of appeal lows. a previous court of appeal judgement went in favour. judgement went in her favour. the supreme court judgement overturned , a different overturned that, uh, a different line and attack's been taken to the uh, sorry , the supreme court. uh, sorry, the supreme court. uh, sorry, the appeal court. and i'd imagine that her lawyers are going take to the going to take that to the supreme too. it is a supreme court, too. so it is a roller coaster for them. this is a point , of course. but a low point, of course. um, but i that that the i imagine that that the direction of travel still remains the same . remains the same. >> do they take any kind of responsibility for shamima leaving in the first place and managing to get over there to syria, etc. >> i mean, of course they would have loved to be able to intervene , uh, on that original intervene, uh, on that original fateful sort of decision that those , uh, three girls, four those, uh, three girls, four girls and total took the problem was, is that the family were specifically excluded by the police at the time from any knowledge around the first goal moving shamima, shamima begum, shamima begum, um, and so they weren't aware of the dangers around there , their daughters around there, their daughters that all you know , came out

that all you know, came out quite, quite bluntly in uh, in a, um , sort of parliamentary a, um, sort of parliamentary committee hearing, um, where the police apologised for their failures around that and so did the school. and they say they had absolutely no idea whatsoever that she was engaging in extremist material online or had any plans at all to go via turkey to join islamic state? >> no , the school themselves, >> no, the school themselves, um, you know , they applied the um, you know, they applied the principles of prevent, i guess, that were available at the time. >> and these girls showed no sign of it. but this sort of radicalisation can happen very, very quickly. and one has to look out for any sort of signs that come forward, particularly when got a very, very when you've got a very, very accomplished terrorist organisation who have targeted girls. they target them and they teach them how to sort of remain undetectable. i've just spoken to an individual in the last hour who spent a couple of years , uh, in around the area , uh, in and around the area where shamima was and speaking to her quite regularly as well .

to her quite regularly as well. >> he made the point that as far as he was concerned, she initially showed quite a lot of contrition. she appeared to contrition. she then appeared to have quite manipulative. have become quite manipulative. this words and he this is his words and he fundamentally doesn't really think that she would necessarily be safe to be brought back to britain. do you think that there are safety implications of having shamima begum back in britain ? britain? >> i mean, if his concern is shamima safety, i can tell you now that her safety will be much better served in the uk than it is in a refugee camp in syria, i think, sorry, i think he was. >> i think he was referring to the safety of everyone else . the safety of everyone else. >> well, i mean, i think if the uk state, which is one of the most mature states in the world, has mature police force has a very mature police force and uh, albeit with some of the mistakes it's shown, but with a screech service, um, at its disposal is not able to secure us from the potential quote unquote, unknown threats that should be begum. now in her 20s, she poses, and i think that's a bit of an embarrassment for our

security services , really, if security services, really, if that's the actual position . that's the actual position. >> um, i think it sets a worrying precedent, though, that somebody can go and join a terrorist organisation in, you know, according to reports, being part of their so—called morality police allegedly sewing people into suicide vests and all of that stuff, and, and then come back home. do you not think that's a worrying precedent ? that's a worrying precedent? >> well, i think that's interesting because, uh, normally what would happen if somebody joined terrorist somebody joined a terrorist organisation is that they'd be arrested, taken to a court of law in the uk every chance presented a jury of one's presented and a jury of one's peers would then convict or acquit based the evidence . acquit based on the evidence. and that is really all that anyone's asking for is anyone's been asking for is that, begum be that, uh, shamima begum be treated the same way as as the bombers ariana grande bombers of the ariana grande contest were treated, as in uk government, uh, hunted them down, found where they were . one down, found where they were. one of them was in libya and then spent treasure and effort to bnng spent treasure and effort to bring them back to the uk to face trial and the accusation of shamima begum that she's been shamima begum is that she's been

involved terrorist involved in terrorist related activities if is activities. if that is supportable , then she should be supportable, then she should be brought back to the uk and face trial in the uk and conviction if evidence supports that charge. >> and in terms of the family of shamima begum now are they helping to fund some of her appeals? i mean, i know her legal team is saying it's going to carry on. there appears to be a a grey area as a little bit of a grey area as to exactly who is paying for this never ending cycle this kind of never ending cycle of i mean, is of appeals, really, i mean, is it taxpayer? it the taxpayer? >> will be the >> yeah, it will be the taxpayer. so uh, our involvement in the case always been pro in the case has always been pro bono. we've never taken a penny in the case has always been pro borourve've never taken a penny in the case has always been pro borour involvementaken a penny in the case has always been pro borour involvement inzn a penny in the case has always been pro borour involvement in it.a penny in the case has always been pro borour involvement in it. uh,nny for our involvement in it. uh, but in terms of shamima begum's lawyers, they are on the taxpayer to fund her continued appeals. just just out of interest. >> then why do you feel so strongly about this particular case? a case where, you know, there's a woman who doesn't dispute the fact that she was in isis? why why have you worked for free for so long to try to

bnng for free for so long to try to bring her back when you know, there's a lot of other cases, presumably you could be taking ? presumably you could be taking? >> sure. i mean, what her case highlights is the fact that we now have a two tier citizenship system in the uk . so you have system in the uk. so you have people who are indigenous to the uk who have an invaluable sort of citizenship because their parents are from this country . parents are from this country. but people like shamima begum, who are born here, but whose parents come from different parents come from a different country, their citizenship appears to be of a low quality and that, to us is fundamentally offensive to the idea of citizenship. >> i just find it interesting. >> i just find it interesting. >> very finally i do >> sorry. i very finally i do just find it interesting. i wasn't that you it pro wasn't aware that you did it pro bono. know, there bono. right. but you know, there are other cases are presumably other cases that could . why? why could highlight this. why? why pick someone who was in isis ? pick someone who was in isis? >> well, i mean, there may well be other cases that could highlight this , but this was the highlight this, but this was the case that came knocking on my door back 2015. um and i took door back in 2015. um and i took it on on the basis that a, i was trying to get some children back who had made a terrible mistake and had been manipulated into

joining isis , and at the time, joining isis, and at the time, the country was very behind the country was very much behind that initiative. had that initiative. things had changed 2019, when her changed in 2019, and when her citizenship and citizenship was stripped, and that something that we felt that was something that we felt very about and very strongly about and continued to support on a pro bono . bono basis. >> right. tasnim thank you >> all right. tasnim thank you very much. i know that you've gone out of your way to talk to us this and us exclusively this evening, and it's so, it's been insightful stuff. so, um, to you again soon, um, i'll talk to you again soon, no doubt. shamima begum, family lawyer akunjee. lawyer tasnime akunjee. right. okay. the okay. look, let's go to the thoughts now, thoughts of my panel. now, director of popular conservatives. got mark conservatives. i have got mark littlewood, i've got apprentice finalist joanna jarjue and ex—bbc political chief, john sergeant mark. quite a lot to go out there. i felt . yeah. do you out there. i felt. yeah. do you think the right decision has been made? and should the taxpayer be paying for these cycle of appeals now? >> well, i, i hope this now draws a line under the case. the judge who said this was potentially a harsh verdict. well, i would agree with that. but i think it's harsh. but a fair verdict and the national security concerns need to win out here. and they have been

judged to have out trumped other considerations . unanimous considerations. unanimous verdict as well i think i think it would be a bit of a fool's errand, really, to go to the supreme court. i would i would hope this is the end of it. i think it is the correct decision and listening to her lawyer there, would like to there, i mean, one would like to believe could charge there, i mean, one would like to beliwith could charge there, i mean, one would like to beliwith terrorist could charge there, i mean, one would like to beliwith terrorist offencesarge there, i mean, one would like to beliwith terrorist offencesarg a her with terrorist offences in a british court. but good luck gathering evidence gathering together the evidence and and and having eyewitnesses and being able to really bring that into testimony in court here. into testimony in a court here. i that's practical i don't think that's practical at so i thought something >> so i thought something that was quite interesting there. joanna, i did put to him joanna, was i did put it to him about the idea that she might still be a threat. and now i'll be honest, expecting him be honest, i was expecting him to she's not threat, be honest, i was expecting him to completelyt threat, be honest, i was expecting him to completely changed., be honest, i was expecting him to completely changed. he she's completely changed. he didn't actually say that. so there the total there was not the kind of total admission she does admission there that she does not pose threat to us. but not pose a threat to us. but you'd bring her back, wouldn't you? >>i you? >> i would bring her back. >> i would bring her back. >> and i think that he was, um, completely correct when he referred two kind of referred to the two tier kind of citizenship. it comes citizenship. and when it comes to shamima begum, i think that if anybody else, you if it was anybody else, you know, if somebody was know, let's say if somebody was

in country and they'd in another country and they'd you to have you know, just happened to have a dad and were a british dad and they were a far right extremist or something like that, nobody would be saying, yeah, bring them back here because they should have citizenship here rather than where and where citizenship here rather than wheractually, and where citizenship here rather than wheractually, know, d where citizenship here rather than wheractually, know, grewzre they actually, you know, grew up. i think that it's up. so i think that it's important for her to come back. up. so i think that it's impoyout for her to come back. up. so i think that it's impoyou know,ar to come back. up. so i think that it's impoyou know, anybodyie back. up. so i think that it's impoyou know, anybody who'sz. up. so i think that it's impoyou know, anybody who's in but, you know, anybody who's in support mean support of that doesn't mean that be bumping into that we want to be bumping into shamima we out shopping shamima when we go out shopping or she or anything like that. she should trial. and should face trial. but and i think it quite realistic i >> -- >> this is 5mm hm >> this is what i've got to ask. >> this is what i've got to ask. >> i'll come to you in a second, john. this what got john. but this is what i've got to know, you, to ask, you know, would you, would her live next door to ask, you know, would you, wcyou? her live next door to ask, you know, would you, wcyou? would her live next door to ask, you know, would you, wcyou? would her live happonor to you? would you be happy about that? going end that? because she's going to end up door to someone, up living next door to someone, right? she's not going to end up spending of life in prison. >> p- p.- >> well, at the same time, we have able to look at the have to be able to look at the facts, obviously the facts, and obviously the professionals be able do professionals will be able to do that what that in in the sense of what crime actually committed. crime she actually committed. and trying to, and i'm not kind of trying to, you downplay her joining you know, downplay herjoining isis nothing. it's isis as nothing. but it's important. do have isis as nothing. but it's imporpeople do have isis as nothing. but it's imporpeople who do have isis as nothing. but it's imporpeople who are do have isis as nothing. but it's imporpeople who are extremists other people who are extremists on other of we on the other side of things. we had a right wing had someone who was a right wing extremist who sadly murdered the politician jo jo cox. so you know, it goes both ways and

nobody's kind of trying to hunt down to see whether that person's parents were born in, you eastern you know, somewhere in eastern europe that . europe or something like that. so you know, we so i think that, you know, we have at fairly and have to look at this fairly and not conflate ethnicity and nationality. >> john, your your view on this. >> john, your your view on this. >> i mean, i know that the vast majority of our viewers and, i mean, i've said this publicly before, myself included. mean, before, myself included. i mean, i it would complete i think it would be a complete and utter mistake to bring this girl back, you know, some, some mistakes have consequences. she joined a jihadi death cult. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> i think the point is that we've got to remember what the judges were looking at was simply whether it was lawful or not for the home secretary to take that decision. so they didn't go through a lot of the arguments. you just heard in the last ten minutes. that is very important. that's as important. and that's why, as mark they should be mark says, they should be advised not to take this further because that's just a straightforward decision. >> you'd dislike it. okay, well then it's to be changed then it's got to be changed politically. but the home secretary has that power. something like people every something like 20 people every

year are caught in this same thing. it's not just to do with her and her only. that's the important thing. the other thing to is that couldn't to realise is that you couldn't say, you your say, we'll give you back your citizenship , but there'll be citizenship, but there'll be certain conditions. no, citizenship, but there'll be certain conditions . no, you've certain conditions. no, you've got to. either someone is a british citizen, which means that she could do whatever she likes . now, you'd have to be likes. now, you'd have to be very trusting person to imagine after what she's been through, that she'd be just some sort of loyal brit who would never hurt anybody. >> no, no, she might hurt people. >> say, though, if any of you guys had a 15 year old daughter who up being groomed by who ended up being groomed by some extremist group, no, but what would you actually say ? what would you actually say? suicide bombers? what would suicide bombers? but what would you say? what you you actually say? what would you say? you still see them as british? >> i'd say good riddance, you jihadi lunatic. >> i'm not talking about just. >> i'm not talking about just. >> also what you also, if it >> but also what you also, if it was your 15 year old daughter, you this. you can hold me to this. >> i mean, there's like >> i mean, i think there's like a a witheringly small a very a witheringly small chance actually happening. a very a witheringly small chance ever ctually happening. a very a witheringly small chance ever have ly happening. a very a witheringly small chance ever have a happening. a very a witheringly small chance ever have a 15 ppening. a very a witheringly small chance ever have a 15 yearing. a very a witheringly small chance ever have a 15 year old but if i ever have a 15 year old daughter find out one day but if i ever have a 15 year old dau�*gone find out one day but if i ever have a 15 year old dau�*gone join ind out one day but if i ever have a 15 year old dau�*gone join ad out one day but if i ever have a 15 year old dau�*gone join a jihadi)ne day but if i ever have a 15 year old dau�*gone join a jihadi deathy has gone to join a jihadi death cult middle she is cult in the middle east, she is

not home. not coming home. >> but also , i >> she's not. but also, i believe you. i think there's another bear mind, too. she went at 15, so that seems >> she went at 15, so that seems , vulnerable and , you know, vulnerable and difficult. if you had 15 difficult. and if you had a 15 year but she's for year old. but she's there for several years. yeah and it's only at this point when in fact is loses , when the islamic state is loses, when the islamic state have lost and she, they've, they've they're citadel in raqqa has been destroyed. so they're no longer in charge of anything. and she then starts saying, oh, i want to go back home. >> so it's not a question of this little girl of 15. >> she's not a 15 forever. she's 17, 18, 19, 20 and she's now 20. >> the uncomfortable thing as well, that a lot of people like to ignore in this discussion is we actually let a huge we have actually let a huge amount returning isis amount of returning isis fighters not fighters back, and that's not always well. fighters back, and that's not alw mark. well. >> mark. >> mark. >> no, that's right. and i mean, i think the point that john i do think the point that john makes the right one here, makes is, is the right one here, that can't that if you were to you can't just what did when just look at what she did when she was 15, that might be forgivable on the grounds that she's persists with she's a minor. she persists with this adulthood. this into adulthood. that's the that's thing . and i that's the key thing. and i mean, it's , in my view,

mean, it's, in my view, unambiguously the right decision to joanna's point. i just i mean, is it practical to actually charge her with what was going on in this faraway land?i was going on in this faraway land? i mean, we'll have limited, limited evidence. so it's more of a almost a military national security decision than you can put this through a sort of fair. >> do you know that they've got limited , um, evidence until you limited, um, evidence until you actually go and she's actually tried properly? >> you can't, presuming that it is rather difficult for an engush is rather difficult for an english court to marshal evidence from a warzone in syria that compared to a, you know, an incident that happens in the united kingdom. >> mark, there's things >> mark, there's also things that openly admitted. it's that she's openly admitted. it's not you not like she's saying, oh, you know, me and i had know, they captured me and i had no what happening. know, they captured me and i had no takent happening. know, they captured me and i had no taken accountability1g. know, they captured me and i had no taken accountability to an she's taken accountability to an extent. those admissions are extent. and those admissions are going something. going to count for something. >> first started saying >> when she first started saying things initially to chap >> when she first started saying thirhad initially to chap >> when she first started saying thirhad on1itially to chap >> when she first started saying thirhad on earlierto chap >> when she first started saying thirhad on earlier who chap >> when she first started saying thirhad on earlier who wasap we had on earlier who was a filmmaker, who was over there, there talk of i was there wasn't this talk of i was trafficked for sexual exploitation. then the lawyers get say, get involved and then they say, well, forms the well, that's that forms the bafis well, that's that forms the basis defence now. so if basis of her defence now. so if we do bring back , i mean, we do bring her back, i mean, we're up we're going to end up in a

situation know, situation where, you know, whatever to or whatever she's admitted to or whatever she's admitted to or whatever she's admitted to or whatever she's got, the lawyers are going get involved with are going to get involved with that. could across, are going to get involved with tithink could across, are going to get involved with tithink overalluld across, are going to get involved with tithink overall all across, are going to get involved with tithink overall all for across, are going to get involved with tithink overall all for this. ross, i think overall all for this. >> my argument is >> um, you know, my argument is again, about that two tier system to system when it comes to citizenship and also looking at nationality versus ethnicity. i'm not a shamima begum , you i'm not a shamima begum, you know, cheerleader or anything like that , but i think she like that, but i think she should have the same , you know, should have the same, you know, be same anybody be tried the same as anybody else good thank you >> okay. good stuff. thank you very everybody another very much. everybody another lively coming lively start to the show coming up, given up, nigel farage has just given a the cpac conference a speech at the cpac conference in the us of a which we will hear gonna get donald trump back elected . elected. >> and in the white house. >> and in the white house. >> there's a time difference in america. anyway, we'll get the latest on what he said and next. look, prince harry's name is back in the courts today. this time us visa and his time over his us visa and his drug use so that court hearing has just finished it finished about 20 minutes ago over in washington dc. we've got the latest from the man who brought that case against the american authorities to tell us all about

that lawsuit. you will not get this anywhere else tonight. this is christys . i'll see is patrick christys. i'll see you a.

sunday mornings from 930 on gb news . okay, welcome back. news. okay, welcome back. >> so tomorrow's front pages are on the way very shortly. but first this is a court case being brought against the department of homeland security to release prince harry's us immigration

records. and it's just finished in washington, dc. conservative think tank the heritage foundation has sued the department of homeland security over their decision, not to share harry's visa records , share harry's visa records, particularly those relating to his drug use. now, harry admitted in his memoir, spare last year that he had previously taken cocaine, marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms. the heritage foundation have therefore questioned why the prince was ever allowed to live in the us in the first place, and whether he lied on his visa application in 2020. they have ultimately called for these documents to be made public. well joining me now is. documents to be made public. well joining me now is . the man well joining me now is. the man who has just been in court for this lawsuit against the department of homeland security. it's niall niall, thank department of homeland security. it's very niall, thank department of homeland security. it's very so niall, thank department of homeland security. it's very so what'shank you very much. so what's happened then ? happened then? >> uh, patrick, thanks very much for having me on the show tonight. >> and as you mentioned, i just actually came back to my office from, the federal courtroom from, uh, the federal courtroom here in washington , dc. here in washington, dc. >> and i have to say, the

heanng >> and i have to say, the hearing actually was very, very positive from our point , a point positive from our point, a point of view, we have asked for the, uh, the release of prince harry's immigration records. we want to establish whether or not harry lied with regard to his drug use. we want to see whether he received any kind of preferential treatment from us authorities . his. and so the authorities. his. and so the federal judge who heard, uh, evidence from both, uh, both sides arguments and both sides, uh, is treating this case very, very seriously . and he made it very seriously. and he made it clear at the end of the hearing, uh, that he may request very soon, in his own words , uh, to soon, in his own words, uh, to see harry's immigration records, uh, in camera . see harry's immigration records, uh, in camera. in see harry's immigration records, uh, in camera . in other words, uh, in camera. in other words, he would the judge himself would be able to review these records and he would be able to see exactly what prince harry put down his application. this is down on his application. this is a big step . if indeed a very, very big step. if indeed the judge goes ahead with that. and i think there's a very strong chance that he that he will. and so this would be a very big development in terms of

getting closer to the release of harry's, uh, record. so a very, a very positive outcome from our point view. point of view. >> just me through >> just talk me through that then. it stands then, then. now. so as it stands then, then. now. so as it stands then, the himself has not been the judge himself has not been able to view whether or not prince harry lied on his visa applications for america. >> right. >> right? right. >> right? right. >> . >> yeah, yeah. >> yeah, yeah. >> the it sounds like he now wants to. >> w- wants to. >> the department of >> yeah. so the department of homeland has refused to homeland security has refused to release information release any information whatsoever . uh, with regard to whatsoever. uh, with regard to the, the, uh, the details of harry's immigration record. so, so the judge himself has not had a chance to review these records, and he made it categorically clear at the end of the hearing, uh, categorically clear at the end of the hearing , uh, that categorically clear at the end of the hearing, uh, that very soon he will make a decision about whether he himself should have the opportunity to review those those records in camera is the legal legal firm and if indeed the judge is able to review these records, uh, then then i think that is a very, very significant development. >> the judge will be able to it will be significant. >> now, as i understand it, the

lawyers represent harry. i've got in my notes here that they also represent of represented the bidar presidency apparently. is that right? and um, so yeah , is that right? and um, so yeah, they're they're saying that the book, the book, 'spare' is not sufficient evidence that harry ever took drugs and that it simply could have been used to sell books. that their sell books. is that their argument? yeah >> so, uh, yeah. so, i mean, i sat in the front of the courtroom, i heard the biden administration's lawyers make courtroom, i heard the biden admi arguments lawyers make courtroom, i heard the biden admi arguments afterers make courtroom, i heard the biden admi arguments after we make courtroom, i heard the biden admi arguments after we have their arguments after we have sued biden administration sued the biden administration for these these records. >> that's my fault. >> that's my fault. >> and so , uh, so the biden >> and so, uh, so the biden administration officials representing the department of homeland security argued today, uh, that prince harry's own books and his revelations about drug use , um, were not were not drug use, um, were not were not necessarily a legal admission by by harry that he had used, uh, drugs . and i thought this was drugs. and i thought this was a ludicrous argument. harry himself wrote the book is in his name. he has admitted a widespread drug use . this is widespread drug use. this is clear cut evidence that would be

accepted in any court. argue that this is not admissible oil, and that this is not evidence of harry's drug taking, i think is completely, uh, i think we could learn a bit from that now, though, can't we, can't we learn a bit from that? >> because why would you make the case? as in, why would they make harry's drug make the case that harry's drug taking in speyer is not definitive proof that he took drugs previously? why would you make that case? unless yes, he had said on his visa application that he hadn't taken drugs. right. because you wouldn't. he wouldn't have to. >> good. that's a very good case. >> and so this is why we're asking the biden administration to release those records. so the american people see exactly american people can see exactly what's and whether or what's in them and whether or not harry, harry lied and lying on an immigration application, of course, is a criminal offence. it's a very serious , offence. it's a very serious, uh, matter here. and i think that, uh , you know, it's that, uh, you know, it's extraordinary the lengths to which the biden presidency is

going to protect these records from public release. why are they doing that ? uh, and this they doing that? uh, and this is, uh, in my view, completely unacceptable. uh, at and there's a real shroud of secrecy surrounding harry's application . surrounding harry's application. why is that? uh, we want to know exactly what's in those, uh , exactly what's in those, uh, those those records . harry, is a those those records. harry, is a huge public figure who's openly talked about his his drug use. so this is not a matter of privacy for prince harry. >> well, well, well, quite right. so then, just to summarise all of this, then we could be getting a result on this when and um , playing that this when and um, playing that forward a bit , this when and um, playing that forward a bit, what could this result in harry being deported . result in harry being deported. >> yeah. so, so firstly if the if the judge requests to see the records himself, uh, that that could be actually within the next few days or so, then the judge will have a chance to review those record , uh, and review those record, uh, and then the judge will will decide based upon what's in those

records whether to release them publicly. but you can be sure if there's evidence of any lying wrongdoing here. uh, on the part of prince harry with regard to his application , you're going to his application, you're going to see those those documents released . so we're moving a step released. so we're moving a step closer towards that. lying on an immigration application as a criminal offence . normally in criminal offence. normally in those situations , the individual those situations, the individual involved would be removed from the united states. got >> well, watch this space. hey niall. thank you very, very much . um, and really appreciate you've literally legged it from court to get back to your office to come on this show. so much appreciate covid my pleasure. i would just really hope that you will keep us updated for the very latest do . very latest dup will do. >> thanks very much. >> that's niall gardner there from foundation. >> that's niall gardner there from you. foundation. >> that's niall gardner there from you. well1dation. >> that's niall gardner there from you. well interesting thank you. wow. well interesting developments. coming up, developments. look coming up, how's gone? too far. how's reality tv gone? too far. so a new program is giving us a glimpse into the lives of footballers wives. stay tuned for some pretty shocking clips. but next. tomorrow's newspaper front pages have just landed , so front pages have just landed, so i all of saturday

i will have all of saturday morning's headlines you. morning's headlines for you. don't move

radio. >> time to take a look. now at tomorrow's newspaper front pages . let's do it . it's the tomorrow's newspaper front pages . let's do it. it's the i. tomorrow's newspaper front pages .let's do it. it's the i. uk offers russian officials british citizenship to defect and pass secrets to mi6. so escape from putin in a new life in the uk basically. so we are we're offering them apparently british passports if they they defect. let's go to the telegraph . if let's go to the telegraph. if health secretary gives backing to decriminalisation of abortion , then victoria atkins says that her record speaks for itself as mps prepare to vote on the first law change in decades. so the health secretary has indicated that she would back the decriminalisation . okay. um, decriminalisation. okay. um, also a picture story there of king charles reading get well soon cards. that's the telegraph. we go to the independent. it's one giant picture story and it's a very

gripping picture. i must say. second anniversary of the invasion of ukraine. if ukraine loses, the west is next is their headline. they've also got the death toll of civilians, of injured, of soldiers there. and the is of, um , i'm the picture is of, um, i'm obviously not the obviously not getting the military terms right here, but what looks like massive cannon what looks like a massive cannon with fire coming out of it. the daily esther, joy , daily express. esther, my joy, mps can bring rights to die law, right? okay. dajmasta rantzen's campaign to force a vote on assisted dying has taken a step forward. so the government are going voting on going to be voting on decriminalising by decriminalising abortion. by the looks and assisted looks of this. and also assisted dying. so keeping them busy. daily mail, vile cat killer who went on to murder oxford dons. transgender daughter picked victim at random and was then betrayed by her escort lover who called the police . i mean, called the police. i mean, that's the headlines. got it all. it's got it all. um, right. so those are your front pages. we will be discussing those in the next section with my, uh, wonderful panel director , wonderful panel director, popular conservatives, mark littlewood, apprentice finalist

joanna jarjue, and ex—bbc political chief, john sergeant. but reason why we're going but the reason why we're going to be talking about something else specifically else now is specifically because mark a vested interest mark has got a vested interest in something coming in something that's coming up, but nigel has just but not nigel farage has just given at the given a speech at the conservative action conservative political action conference states. conference in the united states. you may also know, of course, that truss is there as well. that liz truss is there as well. so this to say about so he's had this to say about the us presidential the upcoming us presidential election . election. >> and whilst i still have some reservations about the in reservations about the way in which the electoral system has been cleaned up, state by state, and i still have some concerns about that, i'm still in no doubt that on november the 5th, we're going to get donald trump back elected. and in in the white house >> so he also gave his thoughts on the state of democracy here in the uk after those protests outside parliament, we see british politicians as cowed, scared , and they were even scared, and they were even scared, and they were even scared to leave the building. >> on wednesday and thursday evenings because we've forgotten who we are. we've forgotten what

we are and we've allowed an extremist fringe to bully us and threaten our very democracy . threaten our very democracy. >> okay, so that's nigel talking at cpac. um, shadow paymaster general jonathan ashworth has said that rishi sunak should have taken action, though, over former prime minister liz truss because she spoke to steve bannonin because she spoke to steve bannon in the us. now, according to ashworth, she spread conspiracy about the conspiracy theories about the deep state. she's been arguing that the left have infiltrated institutions , missions, etc. and institutions, missions, etc. and i'm going to go to my panel on this now. mark bit of context here. so you are the director of the conservatives, liz the popular conservatives, liz truss massive part of that. truss is a massive part of that. do you back this? do you back her about this? >> yes , i think she's got quite >> yes, i think she's got quite an interesting insight which, although she's a very different personality trump , it's personality to trump, it's a similar insight to trump, which is in essence the system is somewhat rigged . and i don't somewhat rigged. and i don't necessarily think that means there's a sort of diabolical conspiracy. but the state bureaucracy of the uk and the

us, i think is prone to a sort of leftist groupthink . uh, and of leftist groupthink. uh, and thatis of leftist groupthink. uh, and that is a sort of truss analysis and a trump analysis. and i definitely think they're on to something there. so and i think the attraction for trump , you the attraction for trump, you know, it's not everybody's cup of tea and in many ways i think i would have preferred the republicans to found republicans to have found a different, less bombastic different, rather less bombastic candidate. but the attraction is drain , knock over the drain the swamp, knock over the applecart. the system isn't working. the system's rigged. i don't agree with his claims about the election being a fraud last round, but he has last time round, but he has channelled substantial support in people who feel utterly disillusioned by the political institutional process of the united states of america. and i think that's beginning to come to the uk, too. and annoyance at the way things happen and the way things are organised and what our institutions do and don't do. >> john, do you think she should be losing the whip over this now? i mean , uh, this is the now? i mean, uh, this is the allegation that she should be doing it. and she also backtracked on her actual

support for donald trump a little bit. didn't she? >> well, this evening. yeah, she was asked several times on channel 4 news whether she was supporting trump and she wouldn't . so i think the wouldn't answer. so i think the whole thing is rather strange. i think what's worrying, of course, is that she seems not to accept that her short period as prime minister was a complete shambles shows that in all sorts of ways. she and her colleagues, her close colleagues , kwasi her close colleagues, kwasi kwarteng, one of those just got things completely wrong. and it took an enormous amount of effort by the banglalink and others to sort of sort things out, and eventually tory mps had to, embarrassingly for them, get rid of her. so the idea that she then says, well, of course it's all a conspiracy . she, i must all a conspiracy. she, i must say, doesn't strike me as being terribly, terribly true or terribly, terribly true or terribly relevant . terribly relevant. >> i think she's absolutely delusional. you know, we all saw what happened. and, you know, she's kind of trying to blame it

on the deep state. tell that to everybody who's mortgage basically tripled after her shenanigans. i just think it's absolutely ridiculous . and it's absolutely ridiculous. and it's almost as if i never really know what to get with liz truss, because obviously, she because obviously, at first she was then she was was lib dem, then she was conservative, was conservative, she was a remainer, a, you remainer, then she was a, you know, the know, ardent brexiteer. who the hell that's i'm hell is she? that's what i'm trying out. it trying to figure out. and it just now again, just seems as if now again, another one that's clutching at straws relevant. straws to stay relevant. >> making the >> i think she's making the point the head of the bank >> i think she's making the po england:he head of the bank >> i think she's making the po england can'tead of the bank >> i think she's making the po england can't reallythe bank >> i think she's making the po england can't really be bank of england can't really be sacked, minister sacked, but the prime minister can. know , ultimately can. and you know, ultimately the england the bank of england made mistakes what mistakes and essentially what brought would be the brought her down would be the allegation, i suppose. >> look, i'm not >> yeah. i mean, look, i'm not going to suggest that liz truss didn't make any errors in her 49 days in office. she moved too fast , too quickly. she didn't fast, too quickly. she didn't take her party with her. her cabinet was nearly exclusively people who had supported her in the leadership contest. i think there's only one sunak. i, um, she tried to do far too much, far too quickly , didn't explain far too quickly, didn't explain it, pitch , as it, hadn't rolled the pitch, as they say, a string of errors, but my concern is this if you

were to imagine a prime minister who had not made all of the missteps that liz truss made , missteps that liz truss made, had carried their party with them, had got everything sequenced properly, i still think it is damn damn difficult to get taxes down, spending under control and deregulation happening in this country because the system is rigged against it. that does not excuse liz truss . uh, against it. that does not excuse liz truss. uh, i'm not suggesting she made no mistake. she did make a good number of mistakes . she did make a good number of mistakes. but even a she did make a good number of mistakes . but even a faultless mistakes. but even a faultless prime minister trying to bring those things about, i think, would tough and would have a tough going. and you're patrick, is you're right, patrick, why is the bank of the governor of the bank of england place the england still in place when the inflation how long inflation target is 2? how long can you fail to hit that target ? can you fail to hit that target? and just sort of so there is a mistake. >> f— mistake. >> argument there is >> i mean, the argument there is there deep state and it's there is a deep state and it's not not dangerous. there is a deep state and it's not rightot dangerous. there is a deep state and it's not right wingngerous. there is a deep state and it's not right wing conspiracy theory >> right wing conspiracy theory to no. >> no, no. >> no, no. >> but but i think you've got to be credible. and she's >> but but i think you've got to be very credible. and she's >> but but i think you've got to be very credibleyle. and she's >> but but i think you've got to be very credible because ;he's >> but but i think you've got to be very credible because she; not very credible because she was, the worst prime was, frankly, the worst prime minister anyone can minister that anyone can remember in the modern era. >> she's been proved >> she's not been proved slightly right, though. now, on certain just the slightly right, though. now, on cert.that just the slightly right, though. now, on cert.that she just the slightly right, though. now, on cert.that she movede slightly right, though. now, on cert.that she moved too fact that maybe she moved too quickly was a big

quickly and there was a big backlash i mean, i think she did >> yeah. i mean, i think she did try much too fast. try and do too much too fast. >> and there was a of shock >> and there was a sort of shock and approach it. there and awe approach about it. there was of, oh, have a, was a sort of, oh, let's have a, you know, let's get rid of the top income then top rate of income tax and then sort of gain bit you top rate of income tax and then sort of attention. bit you top rate of income tax and then sort ofattention. itbit you top rate of income tax and then sort ofattention. it should ou top rate of income tax and then sort ofattention. it should have know, attention. it should have been lot with, liz been a lot slower with, with liz truss now i would have a truss now is that i would have a lot more respect for her if she actually said something was actually said something that was similar actually said something that was simi stand by what i was doing, still stand by what i was doing, but i take some accountability. >> sudden it's >> but all of a sudden it's everybody fault. it's everybody else's fault. it's basically rest basically gaslighting the rest of it's the deep of us because, oh, it's the deep state it's the state that did it. so it's the deep made deep state that made our mortgages deep mortgages triple. it's a deep state everything to the state that did everything to the economy. take some accountability , and then maybe accountability, and then maybe people have some people will start to have some respect people will start to have some res|i'm sure how deep i think people will start to have some res| other sure how deep i think people will start to have some res| other thinge how deep i think people will start to have some res| other thing; hlooking. i think the other thing is looking. obviously the time i remember best really is the time that margaret thatcher was in charge. it took her seven, seven years to get the trade union reforms that she wanted seven years. so the idea that you just simply arrive and within a few weeks and wow , that's it. it's just ridiculous. >> um, just quickly , the other >> um, just quickly, the other stuff that nigel was saying

there was that he he firmly believes that come november the fifth, we're going to have a second terms of president trump. >> do you think we will? >> do you think we will? >> yes. i think that's the likelihood. could likelihood. look, a lot could change and then. change between now and then. trump a few points ahead in trump is a few points ahead in the polls. the nature of the opinion polls. the nature of the opinion polls. the nature of the electoral in america the electoral system in america means trump could probably means that trump could probably lose the popular vote by 2 or 3, and still prevail in the electoral college. if he's electoral college. so if he's a few ahead, looks few percent ahead, it looks like he'll i'm still not he'll prevail. i'm still not completely convinced that president biden will be the democrat candidate that could that that could that could tip that could completely up in completely throw things up in the more likely than the air. but more likely than not, will be elected not, trump will be elected president in november. i would say, yeah, i agree with a lot of what mark said. >> i certainly think that biden might stand down. >> i don't see how he can. >>— >> i don't see how he can. >> i don't see how he can. >> i don't see how he can. >> i don't literally don't see >> i don't see how he can. >> ihe n't literally don't see >> i don't see how he can. >> ihe can't erally don't see how he can't stand. >> plenty of time how he can't stand. >> him plenty of time how he can't stand. >> him to plenty of time how he can't stand. >> him to do plenty of time how he can't stand. >> him to do plen it of time how he can't stand. >> him to do plen it willme for him to do that. it will change terms change everything in terms of who against and who stands against him. and remember, you've got this porn star coming in about why star case coming in about why did he give a £120,000? >> this is trump, not biden. yeah he's trump . trump. this is

yeah he's trump. trump. this is a sake of clarity that clarity. >> but those of you who think there's a porn star involved beau biden. no, not not as far as we know. >> no no no that's made. >> no no no that's made. >> it's a court, that's for sure. >> do you think we'll get trump, uh, potentially, i hope not. >> do you think we'll get trump, uh, butantially, i hope not. >> do you think we'll get trump, uh, but also, ly, i hope not. >> do you think we'll get trump, uh, but also, it's hope not. >> do you think we'll get trump, uh, but also, it's been not. a >> but also, it's been such a long time since everything with the think maybe the insurrection. i think maybe some forgotten, some people have forgotten, but actually, into actually, when it gets into really period, really heavy election period, i think be really drilled think it will be really drilled into the american public's, you know , minds, potential teflon candidate. >> it was unbelievable. i mean, the for a fraction of the court cases thrown at trump would destroy any other politician. it just seems to make no longer. >> yeah, he's going and we're talking stuff, massive talking big stuff, massive stuff. he hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars and it just washes over the guy. >> incredible . >> incredible. >> incredible. >> so we like about him but he's he's got resolve. he's got resolve. and right now look coming up at more of those front pages, i'm also going to be asking you whether or not you think reality tv has gone think that reality tv has gone too given too far because we've been given a the lives of

a glimpse into the lives of footballers, wives and i mean to say, some of it is quite shocking is a bit of an understatement . and we will take understatement. and we will take a at cringe worthy a look at a cringe worthy example of mansplaining that's doing the rounds online this patrick tonight. here patrick christys tonight. here on .

gb news. >> two all right, more front pages for you now . pages for you now. >> okay. this is the mirror. first king and tonic. charles moved and amused by 7000 cards from around the world. that is the royal health battle. the son, mel b exclusive i was so broke i went to lidl to save cash. what's wrong with lidl? there's nothing wrong with lidl. >> is there? >> is there? >> nothing wrong at all? >> nothing wrong at all? >> i don't i mean, very first world problem, very first world problem. >> also, why is he on the front page then ? anyone else think page then? anyone else think that's a bit weird that on the

front page? yeah, probably a bit more news in sound now. does anyone here at littlejohn? anyone here shop at littlejohn? you're anyone here shop at littlejohn? you no . >> no. >> em- em— >> well, i'd like to go to lidl's things. mean. lidl's for some things. i mean. yeah. were . what yeah. didn't they were. what were which i took were they doing? which i took a fancy not the champagne. one fancy to. not the champagne. one of that you. of those things that you. >> the mystery aisle in >> i like the mystery aisle in the middle lidl. the middle of lidl. >> you just don't >> yeah, well, you just don't know get. know what you're going to get. you like, bit of you go in for, like, a bit of ham, or you come out with a lawn strimmer. >> yeah, scuba gear, which >> yeah, some scuba gear, which i like >> yeah, some scuba gear, which i of like >> yeah, some scuba gear, which i of aldi like >> yeah, some scuba gear, which i of aldi as like >> yeah, some scuba gear, which i of aldi as well. like bit of aldi as well. >> little dudes copies. >> aldi little dudes copies. >> aldi little dudes copies. >> indeed. >> yes, indeed. >> yes, indeed. >> well, let's just whiz >> right. well, let's just whiz ourselves over to a couple of viral clips. have doing the viral clips. have been doing the rounds. honest you, viral clips. have been doing the r

there? >> you shouldn't be doing that. >> you shouldn't be doing that. >> you should have been playing golf 20 years. >> what do need do? is >> what do you need to do? is follow through a lot quicker than you're doing than what you're doing there right ? so much better. that right now? so much better. that was not . only. was not. only. >> thank you advice . >> thank you advice. >> thank you advice. >> so just to reiterate, she is a professional golfer and that was a random man at a driving range there teaching her how to do it. i mean, i'll go to you first. does this kind of stuff happen a lot? >> yeah, it does actually. >> yeah, it does actually. >> explain you why >> yeah, it does actually. >> now explain you why >> yeah, it does actually. >> now exactly1 you why >> yeah, it does actually. >> now exactly . you why right now exactly. >> i know this must be the dance of the woman, not as extreme. >> i'm not saying that every week, you know , you go out and week, you know, you go out and someone's kind of showing you what but i don't know. what to do, but i don't know. i think pride what to do, but i don't know. i thibeing pride what to do, but i don't know. i thibeing oh, pride what to do, but i don't know. i thibeing oh, me pride what to do, but i don't know. i thibeing oh, me show; in being like, oh, let me show you the real way of doing it. i'll what this i'll let you tell you what this really it's even more really means, but it's even more hilarious that actually hilarious that she's actually more should be

more professional. she should be the one giving him tips. yeah, it's does it's so weird. but, um, it does happen. it cringe. it's not happen. it is cringe. it's not like huge thing, but it's just like a huge thing, but it's just a bit really? yeah a bit like, really? yeah >> really, mate, hasn't she also egged you know, egged him on a bit? you know, not revealing how skilful she is i >>i -- >> i don't know about that , >> i don't know about that, john, i don't know. you go. she should have gone on to have a professional run. >> um, now, look, we've got another to you all another clip to bring you all right? out of the right? um, so move out of the way. christie amazon way. wagatha. christie amazon are it again . this is are back at it again. this is the latest documentary series . the latest documentary series. it's called married to the game , it's called married to the game, and going absolutely viral. and it's going absolutely viral. it's about well, it's about footballers, but also footballers, but also footballers wives. crucially we just have a look at some of these clips because actually , if these clips because actually, if you actually think about it, actually, technically a bigger move for me it's part of the game in it. >> yeah. you're not going to propose to me today, are no propose to me today, are you? no okay. can put this one okay. so then i can put this one on there we go . just in on here. there we go. just in case it's free. >> it's gonna say free. >> it's gonna say free. >> excuse me. it's gonna say what did. hey. yeah. will you meet her? hahaha . oh shock.

meet her? hahaha. oh shock. >> as footballers do not treat their female partners with maximum respect, there we go. um, right. well, look , we've um, right. well, look, we've just about got time to reveal today's greatest britain and union jackass. today's greatest britain and union jackass . all right, mark, union jackass. all right, mark, who is your greatest britain? >> i'm gonna doff my cap to james cleverly , who sacked the james cleverly, who sacked the border force chief david neil. i believe his name is , uh, good on believe his name is, uh, good on the home secretary . if the home secretary. if functionaries get out of their lane, then i think they are rightly fired. this was from an unauthorised briefing to the newspapers . rightly fired. good newspapers. rightly fired. good on the home secretary for doing it. david. neil's there for my jackass. >> great britain. jon rahm. >> great britain. jon rahm. >> mine prince william. i >> mine is prince william. i think that it was really courageous out courageous for him to speak out about gaza this week . about gaza earlier this week. you know, obviously he was naturally going get some naturally going to get some backlash it shows backlash for it, but it shows that some that it actually has some principle. his principle. and i think that his late mother proud of him. >> okay. john >> okay. john >> greatest britain, an honorary one. >> like, say , navalny's mother, >> like, say, navalny's mother, an amazing isn't it? there she

was. goes up to the penal colony and reveals that they want a private funeral for her son and that she's got to give it. otherwise it'll be behind closed doors. that's a very brave thing to do . and given the her to do. and given the her feelings now, at this moment, it must have been terribly difficult. all right. >> today's greatest britain is navalny's mother, so there we go. literally, we 60s navalny's mother, so there we go. jackass rally, we 60s navalny's mother, so there we go. jackass quickly. 60s left. jackass quickly. >> well, i've said david neal. i mean , the border force chief. mean, the border force chief. he's he's the person who's been the jackass, right? this >> that guy minds. >> i don't like that guy minds. >> i don't like that guy minds. >> of course, liz truss pretending loopy and blaming the deep for state her own problems. there . there you go. >> lindsay hoyle , >> the speaker, lindsay hoyle, for causing complete chaos at westminster. >> it's lindsay hoyle, obviously it is. it's a bad week for lindsay and a bad week for the rest of well. look, thank rest of us as well. look, thank you i have you very, very much. i have had a wonderful evening. i a wonderful time this evening. i really you all on really enjoyed having you all on the panel. and you to the panel. and thank you to everybody watching the panel. and thank you to everlistening watching the panel. and thank you to everlistening tuningytching the panel. and thank you to everlistening tuningytciover and listening and tuning in over the of the week. the course of the week. just a couple little reminders for you. you rewind

you can go back to us, rewind it. whether you're or not. you're us on of you're watching us on one of those television screens you're watching us on one of th

will still persist across some western coasts and across the far south—east as well, western coasts and across the far south—east as well , where it far south—east as well, where it could breezy overnight . could be quite breezy overnight. elsewhere, though, it will be a clear and calm dry night, so clear and calm and dry night, so temperatures will drop away, so it's be quite cold temperatures will drop away, so it's to be quite cold temperatures will drop away, so it's to day quite cold temperatures will drop away, so it's to day onte cold temperatures will drop away, so it's to day on saturday. so start to the day on saturday. so frost potentially some icy patches and also some mist and fog by tomorrow morning that should lift and clear by mid—morning. and many areas will see a dry and bright day through saturday. the best of the sunshine will definitely be through the morning. cloud will bubble into lunchtime and bubble up into lunchtime and into afternoon , allowing into the afternoon, allowing a few to develop , but few showers to develop, but these should fairly few and these should be fairly few and far between and they will be quite light if you do get caught in one the sunshine, it will in one in the sunshine, it will be pleasant as be feeling fairly pleasant as well winds will well with those light winds will be another cold start to day well with those light winds will be sunday, cold start to day well with those light winds will be sunday, but! start to day well with those light winds will be sunday, but acrossto day well with those light winds will be sunday, but across northerny on sunday, but across northern areas it should stay dry and bright through much of day. bright through much of the day. in south, quite in the south, though, quite a different with some quite different story with some quite persistent to persistent wet weather set to arrive of arrive across southern areas of england, into parts of england, possibly into parts of south wales to turns dry up more widely once again on monday before further wet weather

arrives in the north on tuesday . arrives in the north on tuesday. see you later. that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers sponsors of weather on . sponsors of weather on.

gb news. >> good evening, i'm ray addison in the gb newsroom. headliners is up next, but first our top stories and we start with some

breaking news. the prime minister says the uk government is to prepared do whatever it takes for as long as it takes, until ukraine prevails over russia . ahead of the second russia. ahead of the second anniversary of president putin's illegal invasion, rishi sunak is calling on the free world to renew our determination and show tyranny will never triumph. last month , the government signed month, the government signed a ten year agreement on security cooperation with ukraine and increased its total support to £12 billion. we'll just stop oil says it has disrupted labour mp anneliese dodds fundraising dinner in oxford this evening . dinner in oxford this evening. >> the tories have having me smear my youth with oil licences. >> that's why we say we don't want any new licences, but that's not enough . that's not enough. >> well, a coalition of groups including oxford, palestine society, carried out the protest at the nef istanbul restaurant. they demanded the labour frontbencher promised to leave the labour party within six

months