have been found at man have been found at a property in staines. after officers were called to the address by the ambulance service. surrey police say an investigation is now underway to establish the circumstances of their deaths. the force believes it is an isolated incident with no third party involvement . a 32 no third party involvement. a 32 year old mother and a man who were both attacked in separate incidents during the notting hill carnival have now both died. share. maximian was stabbed at the carnival while attending the event with her three year old child. the 32 year old was taken to hospital in a critical condition, but despite the best efforts of medical staff, she died from her injuries. meanwhile museum nato, who worked as a top chef, was found unconscious on monday evening near notting hill carnival and he also died from his injuries. metropolitan police said the deaths have been devastating for both families and they were both now being treated by the force as murder investigations. all shows

verreaux's reunion tour in the uk and ireland have now sold out. after a long day of queuing and website glitches, the brit p0p and website glitches, the brit pop band announced on x that there are no more tickets available for general sale. the band also warned fans to be wary of counterfeit tickets being sold for online inflated prices. the warring gallagher brothers are setting differences aside after a 15 year absence from the stage . fighting will pause in stage. fighting will pause in gaza tomorrow as part of a plan to roll out polio vaccines to hundreds of thousands of children. the scheme will be staggered during breaks in the conflict over three days. last week, health officials confirmed that a baby had been paralysed by the virus, the first such case in the territory. in 25 years. us rapper fatman scoop has died at the age of 53. that's according to his tour manager . that's according to his tour manager. bass drop bass drop.

the artist, whose real name was isaac freeman, had been taken to hospital after collapsing on stage during a performance in connecticut in the us on friday. scoop had success around the world and topped the uk singles chart in 2003 with be faithful , chart in 2003 with be faithful, andifs chart in 2003 with be faithful, and it's being reported that prince harry is looking to make a return to the uk. the mail on sunday is reporting that the duke of sussex has sought advice from trusted former aides in britain on to how mastermind a return from exile in the united states. the move marks the first stage in a strategy to rehabilitate harry that would involve him spending more time involve him spending more time in the uk to repair his relationship with his father, and potentially initiate a partial return to the royal fold. those are the latest gb news headlines for now. now it's time for headliners. >> for the very latest gb news direct to your smartphone, sign up to news alerts by scanning

the qr code , or go to gbnews.com the qr code, or go to gbnews.com forward slash alerts . forward slash alerts. >> hello and welcome to headliners your first look at sunday's newspapers with three comedians and leo schaffer's phone. lewis schaffer's phone. i'm wet and we're all confused. tonight i'm joined by the stunning and brave comedian leo kearse and the man who identifies as a complete clown. >> it's louis schaffer. it was pretty smooth. how are you guys doing? >> sorry about that. i was saying i was taking a picture of leo and i'm doing. >> i mean, there's worse things in your phone that could have played than whatever that was. >> yeah. that was that was actually pretty bad. i mean, it was it was. it was roger waters. so it was right. eight minutes of moving on. >> all right. brilliant. let's take a look at the front pages. mail on sunday has harry asks former aides to help plot his return from exile. the sunday

telegraph has stopped testing children on times tables. unions tell ministers the observer has nhs queues mean most people expect to go private? the sunday times has parents rec pupils futures by letting them stay at home. the sunday express has pubs warn of smoking ban violence. and finally the daily star sunday tv. danny i was victim of sick jimmy savile and those were your front pages . those were your front pages. okay, let's have a closer look at the front pages. leo, let's start with the sunday express. >> so the sunday express has pubs warn of smoking ban violence. beer gardens will be turned into bitter flashpoints, say landlords, as if they weren't already bitter flashpoints for violence , far flashpoints for violence, far right thuggery. but the landlords are saying that the bar staff are going to be thrust into the firing line as customers clash over the new laws. so the bar staff are going

to be, you know, tasked with enforcing the fact that you can't have a rollie while you're having a pint in the beer garden. and so, you know, they're going to be the front line of kyrees apparatchiks and they don't want to. >> i remember when we had the first smoking ban inside and i worked in pubs, then , and worked in pubs, then, and everyone said exactly the same thing. how are they going to enforce it? what are we going to do? what are we going to do if someone lights up, we're going to have a fight and we got over it. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> you know, not that i'm pro smoking ban. i would like to say you're not pro smoking ban and neither am i. >> let people smoke. if they want to kill themselves. and what i found out about smoking, it does, you know, lung cancer, which is supposedly this great. you know, that you smoke, you're going to catch lung cancer. only 7% of people who are like, long term, you know, get lung cancer. a lot, 7% is not that many. >> it's quite a lot, 7% if you smoke. i mean, that's and also there's other stuff. there's emphysema and all the rest of it. but yeah, i can understand banning smoking inside because then it affects other people. even when i smoked, when i smoked, when the ban came in, i liked it because, you know, your clothes didn't stink and you just didn't have that, you know,

it just felt better. you know, it just felt better. you know, it was healthy. going out for a cigarette, you felt like, you know, this is like having a kendal mint cake or something. >> but at the same, but at the same time. it's just taking away the rights and the liberties of the rights and the liberties of the people and after a while, like i was walking down the street today where i live in, in i'm not going to say where nunhead and, and i said, wait a second. they put a building in this shop where there was a shop that i used to go to, and they tore it down and put a building up . up. >> and so therefore we shouldn't have a smoking, but i didn't remember what was there . remember what was there. >> and that's i don't know what the point you're talking about. i'm just saying after time people will remember. do you remember like we forget the time you couldn't smoke in a pub? we don't really think about it, except that time i just brought it up. >> yes, i can remember smoking on buses and little ashtrays in the back of the bus seat . the back of the bus seat. >> no, i'm quite old. >> no, i'm quite old. >> yeah . you and audrey. audrey >> yeah. you and audrey. audrey hepburn. brilliant. okay lewis, what's on the front page of the sunday telegraph? oh, a good news. >> sunday telegraph. top

earners. top earners already fleeing britain ahead of tax raids. and this is. this is what is so funny about that. and this is so funny about that. and this is basically the news is that millionaires with high income of which i am one of them ladies, any takers. but you got to lie to the ladies. they're lying to us. >> us. >> tell them you're lying. >> tell them you're lying. >> well , they lie too. >> well, they lie too. >> well, they lie too. >> they got the. some women are beautiful like my crest over here. but. but. >> so you're leaving with all your millions of dollars? >> this is what they're saying. this is a total non—story. no, it's not a non—story. this is labour seat. i get to my point. >> well, could you get to the point is that is that is that. >> yeah. people are fleeing because people get their aeroplanes everywhere now, and you could live anywhere because you've got the internet and they've got aeroplanes now. yeah, they've got aeroplanes. so you could go anywhere, you could do your business in abu dhabi or, or bolivia, wherever you want to go to. and and people know that they're going to come and take your money away from you. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> no, i totally agree. like and entrepreneurs in particular are particularly mobile. and the worry with this is that

entrepreneurs and high earners, as well as paying the most tax and supporting all the, the lazy labour voters or the, you know, train drivers and people who i need to get lots of welfare because i'm too lazy to get a job, as well as supporting all those who have a job. they generate, they generate the jobs, they create all the innovation and drive the economy forward. so if they leave to go somewhere else, that's got a less restrictive tax regime , less restrictive tax regime, less restrictive tax regime, less of a communist system, then they'll be generating the wealth and building building the businesses in those countries. it's ridiculous. >> and i know people like us that we should have compressed hours, and that might actually be more competitive. labour have got all these ideas about how to promote growth. are you saying that that's not true? >> if people can do their job in >> if people can do theirjob in fewer hours, then they're they're lazy. they're not working hard enough. like it's ridiculous. you think we could do this show in 12 minutes? no, it's an hour long show. >> you can't do one joke in 12 minutes. >> well, we're supposed to, like, do do do the show. yes. >> it's not compulsory, leo, let's move on to the observer, please. >> so the observer has a

grievance. they see j.d. vance attacks working women as being on path to misery in unearthed audio. i mean, this is a bit of audio. i mean, this is a bit of a sort of florid retelling of what happened. this is a 2021 podcast. so it's not like he just said it as he's running for vice president. he's donald trump's running mate in the presidential election, but he said that professional women choose a path to misery by prioritising their careers over having children. i think that's, you know, that's true in a in a number of cases. i think it's perfectly possible to have a career and, and have children as well. like my wife's got a great job much, much better than mine. and she's we've got kids and you know that's that's great. he also in the podcast made some other good points. he claimed the masculinity of men in america is suppressed and attacked. immigrants and democrat democratic republican ilhan omar . democrat democratic republican ilhan omar. so he's he said about her that she'd shown ingratitude to america and that she would be living in a

craphole. can i say that if she had not moved to the us from somalia as a refugee, now the observer, the guardian, whatever you want to call it, they seem to be making the point that somalia is not a is some sort of wonderful place. and, you know, america is a i mean , america is a i mean, objectively, somalia is a worse place than america. that's why people from somalia seek refuge in america . people want to move, in america. people want to move, you know, risk their lives to get to travel. >> is that way around? >> is that way around? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> well, this the problem with this, this story is, is that, yeah, women are unhappy if they follow the career path, but they're also unhappy if they get married and have kids, they're just unhappy. i've never met a happy woman. >> i've never met a happy woman. i've never met a happy woman. >> i didn't mean it that way , chris. >> i think he's saying something. we just don't get to heat something. we just don't get to hear. it's not. that one's definitely always true. and the other is definitely always false. it'sjust other is definitely always false. it's just that we don't hear this very much. so, yes. fair play. yeah. >> that's you know, you said it. you're totally right. we don't get to hear it. that's why it's so shocking. but the truth is

that women are unhappy people. >> but it does point to support me. >> you know ? look at how his >> you know? look at how his wife's happy. >> it points. it points to an issue with donald trump's campaign. because if he'd chosen, you know, say, tulsi gabbard, you know, a strong woman as his running mate, he'd be reaching out to disaffected female voters who might be going with kamala just because. because they're, you know, she's a woman. >> and gabbard would become president. >> but jd, jd vance, jd vance is just he's just appeals to the same people trump appeals to anyway. so it's just, you know , anyway. so it's just, you know, getting the base more likely they're going to come out and vote for him anyway. so i think i think trump maybe made a bit of a strategic error getting jd vance on side and i disagree. >> it is not a i you know, i've been following this a little bit. it's not a strategic error because the truth is, is that people are going to vote for trump or not voting for trump. they're voting for the side. and people who are voting for kamala harris are voting for that side. it doesn't matter who you bring more people over to your side. no, people are not going to go over because she's a woman. >> they would they would, they would if trump had a especially

an ethnic minority woman, i think that would be do you know something totally, totally. >> they would not. >> they would not. >> and tulsi is great as well. >> and tulsi is great as well. >> and tulsi is great as well. >> and you know what? she's not she might be great. but like all women, when okay. >> right. one minute to do this one, louis. finally we're going to have a quick look at the front page of the mail on sunday. >> harry. harry s former aides to help plot his return from exile. and this is this is our prince, prince harry. he's the second son. he's got no future whatsoever. and he went mental because of his wife, his his not. you can blame his wife or his mother. his mother, or maybe prince charles, because charles was cheating on his wife, so he hated his father. and then he said some bad things about charles. and now he wants to. i'm not explaining this properly, but the truth is, is harry's in america. he's not going back to britain. >> and that's that's fine. >> and that's that's fine. >> that's the news. so. >> that's the news. so. >> well, he's got a very unusual background, hasn't he? i don't find it, prince. he is a prince. most of us ask our mates for a

bit of help, don't we? what should i do? i'm working with this lunatic. what should i do about it? they can't help, obviously, but it happens in a business thing. >> let's say they fire me. and i've got to call my friend leo and say. leo, can you help me out? he's not going to answer the phone at that point, but that's what happens in every business. who are you going to ask for help except the people? >> ask louis schaefer on twitter. sorry about that. that's the front pages. examine. join us in part two when we'll be discussing the decline the nhs, how might be getting banged up in estonia and the

soon. welcome back to headliners your first look at sunday's newspapers i'm cressida whitten , newspapers i'm cressida whitten, still joined by comedians leo kearse and louis schaefer. so let's start this section with the observer. leo is our beloved nhs turning into a poor service for poor people? >> yeah, it looks like it. so nhs queues mean that most

britons expect to pay for healthcare. according to this report by the joseph rowntree foundation, which points to a critical shift in expectations and says the public now budget for many routine services. so on average, people budget £200 a year for spending on private healthcare. and yet most people in the uk now believe they will have to spend their own money on private healthcare for routine services such as dentistry, which isn't really covered by the nhs physiotherapy and counselling because they won't be able to get them quickly on the nhs. according to this research, and a record almost a million people were admitted to private hospitals in 2023, which is, you know, a really staggering, really staggering amount. it's risen a lot in quite, quite a short period of time. so people are spending, you know, if you need to have a cataract removed, you've got to wait for months and months and months so people will spend, you know, three grand to have it removed or 15 grand on a, on a new hip because, you know, do you want to spend years waiting for the operation or will you just pay for it? but it means

that as labour raise taxes, a lot of people are going to be paying lot of people are going to be paying a lot more tax and they're not going to be getting they're not going to be getting the service back. the services that they pay for will be enjoyed by other people. and so there's not as much incentive. you know, morally and psychologically, people won't feel part of a cohesive unit that everybody using the same services . so i that everybody using the same services. so i think, you that everybody using the same services . so i think, you know, services. so i think, you know, it's more of an incentive for people to, to do what louis was talking about in the other story and leave the country. >> right. i wondered what you meant. >> or maybe you don't use the nhs. maybe. maybe this is, first of all, when the nhs was set up after the war, nobody went to kwasi. there was no counselling back then, you know, and so the dentistry, nobody went to the dentist. they had their teeth pulled. they didn't have dentistry like they are now. the problem is, is that is that only only less . so a million people only less. so a million people went to the i. i'm getting my i have a heart scan thing to just see if i'm doing okay. i'm doing amazing. but you know in america it's $99.99. here it's $1,300.

cressida. what? >> i thought america was supposed to be more expensive. >> no, it isn't, because there's competition. so when you're going to pay for it, you go to you go to the. they say, you know, oh, you've got must have money. so we're going to charge you 13. >> so really then long term we're looking at private health care aren't we. >> well of course we're looking at because because the truth is when they set up the nhs, people weren't they didn't think it's like, how long is a piece of string? if it's free, give me an entire ball. if i have to pay by the inch, i'll just take this much string. >> and you can see so many british people they know the nhs is free. they know that they can get patched up for free. so they let their bodies just absolutely degenerate into their fat, their slovenly, their lazy. yeah, completely. >> schafer obviously looking at the mail on sunday, louis, someone in estonia has plagiarised the rwanda plan. >> oh, yes. >> oh, yes. >> is this in australia? what is this? what story? >> we know it's in estonia. oh. >> we know it's in estonia. oh. >> in estonia. so you said australia. did you say australia? >> no, i said estonia. like. like what it says on the story. >> i wasn't listening. >> i wasn't listening. >> i was sorry , was that right? >> i was sorry, was that right?

>> i was sorry, was that right? >> i was kidding, that was joke. >> this is the slickest, the slickest story you've ever covered. >> this is the worst show that i've ever done. honestly, i just feel i was fighting all day with my girlfriend. did you read the headune my girlfriend. did you read the headline british prisoners could soon be housed in estonian jails after numbers of imprisoned in england and wales hit record high of 88,000 people. so what? they're saying is, they're saying is we don't have any prisoners here because we're arresting little old ladies for sending a tweet out or for yelling at a horse or something, or for yelling at a cop. we're not allowed to yell at a cop. so we'll send them to estonia. people don't know where estonia is. it's. it's above latvia, which is a pretty cold up there. >> it's pretty cold. >> it's pretty cold. it's >> it's pretty cold. it's right next to russia a bit. >> it's got nice prisons, though. well—run prisons. >> you know what it probably does because they were, i guess because they were a new country and they had a they wanted to they wanted people to be proud. but only 88,000 people are in prison. in prison, which is different than a jail prison in this country, which compared to like 2.5 million in america. and we are lower. america is lower.

>> yeah, but if our prisons are full, they're full, aren't they? leo, what do you think about this? is this madness, or is this? is this madness, or is this a practical solution? yeah, this a practical solution? yeah, this is a practical solution. >> this is. this is a lot like using private healthcare. when the nhs doesn't have capacity to treat everybody because you've opened your borders to the entire world. yeah so this is sending people, sending people to estonia to go go to jail there. it's the private sector. we do it with power. if one country has got more electricity than another country, the grids shuffle the power around. so yeah, why not do it with prisoners as well? >> visiting? very difficult, wouldn't it? >> well, it might make it, but not that difficult because it's probably to go to estonia. it probably to go to estonia. it probably takes two hours on a plane. yeah. you try, you try 99. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> for nothing on ryanair or whatever. but you go down to cornwall or something, or devon with, with a, with a mountain, with, with a, with a mountain, with a mountain and there's a whatchamacallit on top, a prison on top of the mountain. and what is it called, dartmoor prison or something? i'm not sure. i'm not sure, but yeah, it's going to be a it's going to be a it may be

better. it's not going to be any better. it's not going to be any better. it's not going to be any better. it's going to be about the same . the same. >> but i mean the real problem is we're locking up like lewis said, locking up 11 year olds. we're locking up, you know, women who send a tweet and some of the some of the memes that are being shared aren't even offensive. i don't know how any judge could see them as inciting violence or anything like that. so yeah, i think we need to look at the two tier justice system . at the two tier justice system. even the police front cover of one of the other papers was was saying, basically the police were admitting, you know, we need to tackle this perception by by stopping doing it. >> very good. we're in the sunday telegraph now and one man's authoritarian overreach is another man's robust democratic leadership. >> so brazil has suspended x or twitter. if you're a traditionalist after a fight with elon musk. so the move comes after months of wrangling between elon musk and the supreme court judge alexandre de moraes , over the latter's moraes, over the latter's investigation of what they call extreme right wing content on x, including alleged hate and anti—democratic fake news. now

that's what the left wing say. they say there's all this, you know, right wing hate and anti—democratic fake news. however, a lot of stuff that's been smeared as that is actually, you know, legitimate criticism of the government by, by political rivals, by the right wing in brazil. and obviously there's a sort of, incentive for the left to, to use whatever laws they can to silence their political rivals and try and stay in power. and we've seen this already happen in america. it happened with the hunter biden laptop story. so, you know, the various government agencies and the democrats and big tech and the media colluded to suppress the legitimate and true hunter biden laptop story to help joe biden win the election. and we've seen social media being used, for example, in the arab spring to criticise its leaders. and it's, you know, it's but even if this wasn't legitimate, whatever that means, musk would say he's a free speech absolutist, and it's not anybody's business to police

what other people say. >> or you're right, it could be policed by getting at the people who are actually saying it. you don't take away the platform. you know, if someone writes something and they place an ad in the new york times that they, you know, like you don't blame the new york times for printing it, then you blame the person. i heard some very interesting information that the cia, which is the central intelligence agency , has been giving money to agency, has been giving money to like thousands of brazilian politicians to suppress stuff. but at the same time, we give money to people for free speech, supposedly . and the fact that supposedly. and the fact that joe biden hasn't done anything to stop this thing because this is a major american business, and they should say, hey, if you cut off, you know, we'll cut off whatever we're sending you. >> yeah, but joe biden wants to silence twitter as well, wants to silence elon musk, because, you know, that's where the criticism of joe biden is allowed, which is why they will not let trump become president. but the left need to worry about the precedent that they're

setting. so we've seen, you know, the founder of telegram being arrested. we've seen the eu threaten musk. we've seen, you know, twitter being shut down in brazil. but this precedent, you know, when the right's in power, they could do the same stuff. and they could they could absolutely. they could say, look, you did it. so, you know, we're just we're just doing it. so they're creating a weapon that's going to be used against them. >> absolutely. okay, louis, let's have a look at the daily mail sunday next. keir starmer is desperate to make changes to our transport system. is he going to make it more efficient? >> of course he's not going to make it more efficient. he's labour and these people don't know how to do anything. you hate to say it, they don't. you know, whatever. keir starmer accused of fast tracking plan to renationalise british railways to please union paymasters. and because, first of all, they believe in nationalisation, because they believe that they know better than everybody else . know better than everybody else. so why shouldn't they run, run something. they've never done anything. keir starmer has never beenin anything. keir starmer has never been in business. he's never he's never been. >> but does he believe in it or is he being told to believe in it by the unions? >> no, he this is his team and his unions are supporting him. >> and they he knows for a fact

that if he is allowed to do this, he will get more. it's a power thing. that's what the left is all about. like taking away power from individuals like us who they can't control to yes, buying votes . yes, buying votes. >> essentially. it's like the peronists in argentina. so you know , the unions, it's a it's know, the unions, it's a it's a scam as well. it's like blatant cronyism. they donate money to laboun cronyism. they donate money to labour. and then in return they get billions of pounds worth of pay get billions of pounds worth of pay rises. so you know, it's the best money you can ever spend. the return on that money is just insane. but yes, it's when keir starmer inflates the public sector and hires more people and hires more civil servants and, you know, nationalising the railways. he's buying votes, he's buying labour voters. but it's not good for the country as a whole. >> well, no, i'm not looking forward to train times getting even sloppier. okay. closing this section with the sunday telegraph and news of a far right radicalism in austria. leo, give us the details. >> far right thuggery. >> far right thuggery. >> so this is austria's poll topping freedom party, which plans to enshrine in law that there are only two genders in

there are only two genders in the country's constitution. so the country's constitution. so the move comes as part of a crackdown on woke madness that includes banning transgender athletes from women's sports , athletes from women's sports, and also a ban on civil servants from using gender inclusive language, and an end to public funding for so—called woke ideology. when they say gender inclusive language, they mean, you know , sort of religious, you know, sort of religious, ideological language that says that i'm a woman and stuff like that, which am i'm a woman, i identify as a woman. and also a lot of this stuff that's, you know, described as far right is just common sense, because at the moment, the there's a lot of ngos and charities that are actually very extreme in their positions, but they they lobby the government. they lobby organisations and they, they sort of posit themselves as the sort of posit themselves as the sort of, you know, we're the we've done the research and we know what we're talking about. and also this is what people want, and it's not at all what people want. >> well, this is a perfect example of the way the world is. the brazil story. same thing is it's the world is divided into two teams. you've got the team world team, which is like which is this stuff, which is the opposite of this stuff, which is

like woke stuff. and then you have this team, which is whatever it's called , fpo and whatever it's called, fpo and they're they call it , they call they're they call it, they call it woke. they call it, they're fighting against woke that it's just the two teams. our team, at least my team. maybe not my team. maybe your team is. we're against letting men run against women. no one wants to see that race. >> oh, you do mean in sport. not in sport. okay, maybe that's the end of part two. come back after the break for rock n roll news plans for a new chain of restaurants. and find out what some swedes

welcome back to headliners opening this section with the sunday express and education secretary bridget phillipson has grand plans. is she going to make sure every child can read louis, >> i don't think that that's included in this, she actually

is this woman. new school curriculum will teach every child to be a rock star. a rock n roll star. and this is a nice way of putting it. they they want to improve. they want to make. they want broader, broader curriculum of all the stuff that the tories supposedly cut, like music, art, sports and drama. stuff that may make britain money because britain has a real musical society. and so maybe it'll help. but yeah, if i was advising a 16 year old, i would definitely say get a guitar gold and you want the government to give them money, but the truth is where was where was where was the government when the beatles were kids? they weren't they weren't trained by the government. where was oasis? where were the kinks? you know what i mean? it's only been in recent. >> yeah. >> yeah. >> it's, tensions between men and women that make great music, isn't it? not governments . yeah. isn't it? not governments. yeah. don't you think? or perhaps you disagree, leo? well, yeah. i mean , it's going to make loads mean, it's going to make loads of great futures for kids. >> yeah. i mean, i think teaching, teaching music and stuff like that in schools is

good. >> and they make the point that music is worth £4 billion a year to the to the british economy as an export. so we export probably more music than certainly anything tangible, anything you could put in a like a car engine or something like that. but i think we also need to look at, you know, so much, so much of stuff you get taught at school is really dry. it's all this like maths , trigonometry stuff. like maths, trigonometry stuff. i've never used trigonometry once in my life, you know what i mean? like geography, like, i don't . you just get on a plane don't. you just get on a plane and get off in stockholm and what they need to do is teach entrepreneurialism and to how fight. and they need to stop coddling children . you've got to coddling children. you've got to teach them survival skills. we're gonna we're gonna we're all going to need to revert to cannibalism soon. >> how can the government teach anything you don't trust? >> the government? they should basically eliminate all or whatever they call the state government schools, state schools, and let people educate themselves. this is part of this education program, is a part of the left and even the right, because they're all one. this unit party is telling everybody to what what to do and what to think and what to believe in.

and they'd be better off with no schools, no . is that too extreme? >> radical position . brilliant. >> radical position. brilliant. okay, observer. next. another day, another public health measure. this one's modelled on communist era poland. leo >> yeah, so calls for return of churchill's national restaurant service to tackle food inequality. i've never heard of this. it's sort of like the national health service, but for dinner. so public diners, as seen in 1940s britain, offering nutritious meals at reasonable pnces nutritious meals at reasonable prices should be everyday eating places, says an mp backed report. and apparently these churchill's british restaurants there's a chain of government funded canteens were intended to counter inflation in food and fuel prices related to the war. obviously, you know, there's rationing and all the rest of it, so people couldn't get food as well as to boost community spirit. we could certainly do with a bit of that, although i think it might actually be illegal under keir starmer to having a community. well, it depends what community you're from, certain communities. have you got a community leader if you're allowed a community leader, then it's encouraged. if you're not, then you are racist. >> how did you never hear about

this? >> because i'm not 70. >> because i'm not 70. >> so i contacted my parents today. my dad had never heard of it. he's from doncaster. maybe that's. he said he didn't think it got up there. my mum's from london, so i called her and she said nope, never heard of it. yeah. and she said my mum isn't old enough to have been around when this was happening. but i said, well did nan ever talk about it? she said no, she'd never heard of it, which is really weird. so i wonder how. i mean, it says here there were more of as many of these as there are branches of mcdonald's today. how come we have never heard of it? >> i'm going to tell you why we never heard of it, because they started in 1940 when the germans were blowing up whole neighbourhoods and people didn't have a place to eat. so they probably set up these restaurants the same way a factory has , like a canteen or a factory has, like a canteen or a school has. >> so do you think they were really small? like it could just be somebody opening their house? >> no, they could be, because it said there was 600,000 people were served or something, you know, and i think they might have existed, but it wasn't that special because the whole place was burned. so we'll let you know. and then eventually, by 1947, so many of them were

losing money. so imagine it's like the nhs. if you lived another 20 years, 30 years, 50 years, the food would have been horrible and they would have been bankrupt. >> this feels to me like the government want to kind of it's more of the government looking after us, isn't it? it's come to us. we'll tell you what to eat. you can't be trusted. you keep eating mars bars come here and it's more control for us. >> it's like the thing in 1984 where you go down and you shout at the screen and stuff and, you know, keir starmer, you're not allowed to have any privacy anymore. he's got to be able to look at your whatsapp messages. you're not allowed to say anything. you're not allowed to vent. and you've got to eat your slop in the in the in the state canteen. >> you don't make meals at home. i find that really weird. what happens at christmas? >> there is there is an issue with the number of the number. >> lord. >> lord. >> the number. yeah. no, no. christmas. oh my god. oh you white supremacist celebrating christmas. oh, what do you think this is, some sort of judeo—christian country anyway? apparently the number of patients in england and wales treated for nutritional

deficiency is tripled in a decade. so maybe we do need something. just not this. >> well, we don't need the government to tell us what food is, because it was the government that set up the food standards in america in here, which is which has made people go bad. they don't want people. they don't want people to have meat. if you have meat, you will not be nutritionally deficient. look at how great i look. >> there you go. he got it in 27, more bad news for landlords in the sunday telegraph. now, lewis . lewis. >> yes, landlords. the telegraph landlords won't get money back after costly eco upgrades. and what they're trying to do is they're trying to get they're trying to raise flats up the thing up you know, from f to e to d to to c c. to dto to cc. to d to to c c. >> this is the where did you learn the alphabet? energy efficiency rating? >> did i seem like i was forgetting it? >> gb news fe91. >> gb news fe91. >> well, you tried doing that. what was the last time you did the alphabet? >> the alphabet and the. so the point is, the government's trying to get these landlords to upgrade the energy efficiency of these properties. it's going to cost a lot of money between

they're estimating ten and 27,000 and they won't get it back at sale at sale. >> so they're saying when you bnng >> so they're saying when you bring up a place from, from d to c, it could cost £27,000, as you mentioned, but it might only add £3,000 in value to a 3 or $400,000 house. so you're going to lose £24,000. so they're basically saying it's the energy. whole thing is a scam anyway, so i wouldn't worry about it. >> yeah. landlords are getting hammered with all this red tape and all these requirements around. you got to have a smoke. smoke detector. you've got to have a lock on the door. there's all these, you know, ridiculous demands. and if you if you get rid of all the demands on on landlords, there'll be more properties and cheaper properties and cheaper properties for people to learn all the costs. eventually get kicked down to the renters. so, you know, renters shouldn't be cheering this stuff on. javier milei cut all the restrictions on landlords in argentina and

the amount of properties available tripled pretty much overnight by 200%. >> yeah, yeah. amazing. okay, sticking with the sunday telegraph, a story about micro rainbows. are they as problematic as micro aggressions? lee. >> so this is trafalgar square's fourth plinth, which they have you know, art installations on. so the funding for it has gone to an lgbt migrant campaign group. so this, this pedestal is used to display a rotating series of artworks and the latest publicly funded piece is imprints by theresa teresa margolles, which comprises of plaster casts of the faces of 850 transgender people. shame. it was the faces that could have been more interesting, but and probably easier to climb. but enlisted to help with the production of the sculpture was the campaign group micro rainbow, which pushes for the release of detained migrants and seeks to place them in housing. so when they say lgbt migrants , so when they say lgbt migrants, quite often people pretend to be gay, there's no test. you don't have to touch anything. there's no you know what i mean? so they

pretend to be gay so they can then trick the system to stay, or they pretend to be christian or they pretend to be christian or whatever. and then, you know, they get free housing from this state funded, basically. you know, this is this isn't an entirely benevolent, kind thing. this is, you know, this is this is possibly helping people cheat the system. >> and it's only temporary because eventually the whole the whole city will not be pro lgbt people . so it's just, am people. so it's just, am i right? i mean, it's temporary anyway, but i don't think it's going to be anti. i think it might be anti. >> are you saying that the hyper celebration might come to an end? >>i end? >> i think the idea that lgbt is universally good that we as maybe as we might think, i think you're trying to say we're all equal and we don't need to pedestal some groups over others. >> okay, great. closing this section with the observer . section with the observer. lewis, why are the swedes culturally appropriating hollywood? >> well, this is an interesting

story and not our tradition calls in sweden to ban fathers walking down, walking brides down the aisle. what it is, is and this is this is not even the government and this is not even done already, but this is the lutheran church in sweden, which is like the national church of sweden. i guess if they have a church, they're probably less religious than we are they? anyway, they definitely probably, whatever the new thing in sweden is, you walk is you is they're having fathers walk the daughters down. the bride to give the bride away, which comes from america. and of course, people don't like that because it comes from america. and in the historically in sweden, according to the article, they say that women, that men that the bride and the groom walk down together holding hands because they would probably be having sex the night before . having sex the night before. >> it doesn't actually say that, lewis. >> it does say that this is the symbol of symbolism of this is patriarchal and you can't escape the patriarchal symbolism. >> but you could say that about using electricity and roads,

couldn't you? i think they're imposing that. and apparently sometimes it's the mothers that walk you down the aisle. so i feel like these people are getting too involved. let people have their wedding the way they want, and it's only 10% sorry, it's only 10% of all the weddings. >> so it's not even that many. and the truth is that they're talking about it. that goes against tradition. how old is lutheranism in in sweden? >> it's got to be quite old, is it? it's like christianity. >> no, it's lutheranism is protestantism. it comes from martin luther. and he was he was around in the 15 or 16, 1500s or something. so it's not like lutheranism is like ancient tradition. it's not like the 1500s is quite recent for you. >> well . >> well. >> well. >> i'm surprised you're a theological expert. i didn't know that . know that. >> well, i know, i know martin luther. i know he's a protestant. i know that stuff. and so do you guys. so does. so does our audience. they're very smart. >> me, me and my wife, we didn't. we didn't have an aisle. so that solved that problem . so that solved that problem. >> any reason, >> any reason, >> it was a registry office, so fair enough. >> yeah. brilliant.

>> yeah. brilliant. >> and i wouldn't suggest getting married nowadays anyway, because the whole state is involved and you're going to be so cynical. >> that's the end of part three. join us in the final section to find out what more than half of cyclists do. a rage friend is, and why it doesn't always

welcome back to the final section of headliners, beginning with the sunday telegraph and shocking news that some cyclists are actually stopping at red lights . lights. >> yeah, so more than half of cyclists jump red lights at a busy london crossing, so they did two rush hour traffic counts near saint thomas's hospital in westminster bridge road in london. they found hundreds of cyclists weaving between pedestrians on pavements , riding pedestrians on pavements, riding in the wrong direction. i mean, they didn't really need to do a survey to find this out. you just you see it every day . the just you see it every day. the worst incidents included a teenage cyclist mounting the pavement on his bike. i think he

wasn't just remarkably excited and screeching to a halt inches from two children while other cyclists were reading mobile phone messages, riding without, without holding their handlebars or performing wheelies. i mean, this sounds like me getting told off when i'm seven, but yeah , off when i'm seven, but yeah, basically cyclists, there's a serious thing here as well, because some people have been killed by cyclists, so there's an 81 year old killed, 91. no, there's also a 91 year old. but this is a different person. so this is a different person. so this this person was killed by a cyclist who was travelling at 29 miles an hour in a 20 mile an hour zone, and another person, the 91 year old, was killed after being hit by a cyclist. and those e—cycles can go really fast. >> yeah, that's not a bike . >> yeah, that's not a bike. yeah, subject to that being called anything other than a vehicle, but you don't get what the point of the story is. >> what is the point? the point is the state wants to come in and regulate bicycle usage and make sure everybody has got a license to drive one, make sure every bike is registered. make sure everybody follows the law. this is it's like it's like keir

starmer just this is it's like it's like keir starmerjust like this is it's like it's like keir starmer just like too this is it's like it's like keir starmerjust like too much, man. you can just see the guy is like a horrible, at least at least the tories. they lied to you and they seem nice. this guy means stuff. and the stuff that he means, he is it doesn't matter. i'm a millionaire, so i'm going to fly somewhere else. >> i love this, so offended by people having principles. >> louis, i've always thought of you as a rage friend, but i'm just finding out that i've been using that expression all wrong. this is in the independent. oh. >> from where we met, we met at a no, we didn't meet there. ever heard of a rage? friends, here's why we all need one. this is one of those non—stories. i'm mentioning non—story for people who are keeping track of the louis schaefer bingo. it's like somebody somebody you talk to who when you're angry. i'm being very coherent tonight, but someone you talk to because you're angry and they listen to you're angry and they listen to you and they listen to you. there's another word for what's called a rage friend. it's called a rage friend. it's called a rage friend. it's called a friend. that's what people do. yeah. and this is. and only a woman would write this thing because no guy would really listen to a guy who's screaming. the guy would say, stop screaming at me, louis, i

know you're angry, but this is how you solve it. or just stop. how you solve it. orjust stop. >> but no, we do have, you know, we've got whatsapp groups where you can share horrible memes and things and vent and, you know, say what you say, what you really think or say. you know, say ridiculous stuff because you just need to. it's like this woman says, and she's writing in the independent. she goes onto whatsapp with her, and she's got these friends where she can expel, she can vent her anger without judgement and often without judgement and often without advice. in return. and the thing with this is keir starmer would see this as online far right thuggery. >> yes. >> yes. >> and this, this is the sort of thing that can actually land you in jail for many years. >> if somebody, somebody took offence at it or they were just watching . watching. >> exactly. >> exactly. >> or if it just got uncovered or revealed if the person was forced to reveal their phone messages when they're stopped by the police. so this is the sort of thing under the online safety act, even though this is a woman in the independent, she probably approves of the online safety act. she probably thinks it's great. she's a liberal writing in a liberal newspaper. oh, of course we shouldn't allow hate speech. sometimes people vent

and sometimes people need to have privacy and need to say things that might sound terrible read out in court, but this just shows exactly why we need privacy. >> was i in violation of keir starmer's online? whatever it is by me screaming, how could i possibly know ? possibly know? >> it's not defined, we don't know. how do we know if someone's taking it? >> just remember it's a comedy show. i was kidding, i was kidding. just go to my youtube. my kidding. just go to my youtube. my face, not my twitter twitter thing while we still have it in this country at louis schaefer .co.uk. >> brilliant. okay sorry about unintended consequences from the independent. now, leo. >> so girls as young as 11 are using harmful anti—aging products that they see on social media. i mean, are these girls really 11 or are these products just really good? we don't. we don't know. but yeah, basically, yeah. young girls are using these these ridiculous products that are advertised on social media that aren't, you know, subject to the same rigorous controls that you get when you buy them from boots. so, you know, if you're going to buy anti—aging products, number one, if you're 11, you don't need it. you're already young. >> that's the real issue, isn't

it? they're putting things on their skin that are designed for older people, and their poor baby skin just can't cope with it. >> oh yeah. >> oh yeah. >> so yeah, if you do have the leathery skin of a of a septuagenarian, then, you know, you might need it. but yeah, if you're 11 you're not going to like the acid peels and stuff. you know, you're going to peel it back to what you want people to see your skull insane. it's ridiculous. so yeah, this girl who did it, she, her skin burned intensely and erupted in blisters. and. yeah, these are aduh blisters. and. yeah, these are adult strength products that wreaked havoc on our skin . wreaked havoc on our skin. >> but what is this story actually saying? what is it saying? it's back to saying we need more regulation of what's going on online, because we have to save the skin of 11 year olds. >> louis, let's just squeeze one more in. this is the mail on sunday. and louis, these people make your diet look conventional. >> yes, this is the mail on sunday, which is the mail just on sunday. do you take what it basically it says it says the netflix is prepared to show these two guys eating a hot dog eating contest and, and you should you should eat hot dogs because it's got bread and it's

processed and you should eat too many of them. and they want people to eat too many. and i hope these 76 hot dogs in ten minutes. >> yeah, that's with the sausage and the bun. >> that's insane. it is insane. >> that's insane. it is insane. >> it's going to cause type 2 diabetes. >> and this isn't them sitting down for lunch. >> this is a competition. >> this is a competition. >> they do it once and i guarantee you, when somebody dies and they will, and they will die, then you say you heard it from louis schaefer. somebody's going to die. don't do it. >> somebody else did. 9.22l of chilli. yeah, like in one go. >> and the sad thing is i can't eat. >> it's nearly over. so let's take another quick look at sunday's front pages. the mail on sunday has harry asks former aides to help plot his return from exile. the sunday telegraph has stopped testing children on times tables. unions tell ministers the observer has nhs queues mean most more people expect to go private and the sunday times has parents wreck people's futures by letting them stay at home. the sunday express has pubs warn of smoking ban violence . and finally, the daily

violence. and finally, the daily star tv . violence. and finally, the daily star tv. danny i was victim of sick jimmy savile and those were your front pages. that's it for tonight's show. thank you to my guest, leo and louis. steve and alan will be here tomorrow at 11 pm. with paul cox and carrie marks . and if you're watching at marks. and if you're watching at 5 am, please stay tuned for breakfast. good night. >> that warm feeling inside from boxt boilers . sponsors of boxt boilers. sponsors of weather on . gb. news weather on. gb. news >> hello! here's your latest weather update from the met office for gb news. over the next few days, the weather will be turning increasingly unsettled. we'll start to see some outbreaks of rain developing, even some thunderstorms in places. that's because high pressure starting to pull away to the north—east of the uk, allowing our south easterly flow to develop, and this warm front starting to introduce some cloud from the south. and that's certainly the case as we head through the evening into the overnight period, more in the way of cloud pushing northwards across england and wales. some showers starting to break out, some locally heavy, particularly towards the far south and

southeast towards the end of the night, where the odd thunderstorms possible . so the thunderstorms possible. so the clear skies looking towards the northwest across parts of scotland and northern ireland, and here turning quite chilly in some rural spots into mid to upper single figures holding up though in the south. quite a humid night across some southern areas with lows in the high teens celsius. as for sunday, we'll start the day across the north and northwest of the uk on a fine note. any early mist and low cloud lifting to give some sunshine at times, but the sunniest weather towards the far north—west of scotland, heading further south into england and wales more in the way of cloud around. and at this stage in the morning we'll start to see a few showers breaking out, but particularly across the central and southern part of england. here again, 1 or 2 heavy, even thundery showers are possible. as we head through the day, those showers start to become more extensive across some central and southern parts of england, eventually working their way north into parts of northern england into the afternoon too. so it's a north—west of the uk and across some western spots, seeing the best of the lingering brightness with 1 or 2 lighter showers here. but those showers across england and wales, there eastern parts of wales there locally on

the heavy side and could give some flooding in places as well, temperatures peaking in the southeast at a very warm and quite humid 27 celsius. as for monday, more low pressure will be in charge, so it stays very unsettled, but we could see some further thundery showers across the east and northeast of the uk , the east and northeast of the uk, with rain also working its way in from the west, eventually turning fresher out across parts of northern ireland. temperatures here no better than 18 celsius in the afternoon. an unsettled start into the coming working week, but things perhaps turning a bit drier towards the middle part of the week, with temperatures returning to the seasonal average . seasonal average. >> a brighter outlook with boxt solar sponsors of weather on

is taking angela rayner's new

four day working week rather literally. i'm joined by apprentice star mark ryan parsons , spin doctors peter parsons, spin doctors peter barnes, andy williams and the formidable dame andrea jenkyns. tonight on the show , over to you, andy. >> freebies for mps may not be popular, but they're inevitable. pete >> the labour party, just after being in office for weeks, are already under investigation for sleaze. >> should we cancel notting hill carnival? >> andrea, the labour government drops free speech laws after universities fear interest regarding china. >> and mark ryan, the labour party want to reduce the working week to four days. are they justifying laziness? >> this is 6 pm. and this is the saturday five. sorry, i did mean ryan . mark, by the way, mean ryan. mark, by the way, make a correction.

>> makes a mistake. >> makes a mistake. >> we want to get the show off to a good start this week. so welcome to the saturday five. thank you all for your lovely messages coming in on my debut presenting tonight. i can't promise it's going to be smooth, but it will be great tv nonetheless. and for those of you who don't know me, obviously i'm not the alex armstrong from pointless, but i can promise tonight's show will be anything but pointless. also making his debut, we've got ryan mock from the apprentice with us. >> hello, hello, hello. thank you for having me. >> let's hope he's improved his negotiation skills, because he's definitely going to need them tonight. yeah. don't fire me. hopefully not by the end of the show. we've also got our very own spin doctors, alastair campbell, in the form of andy williams and a dom cummings in the form of peter barnes. no dodgy dossiers or mysterious trips to durham tonight planned, ihope trips to durham tonight planned, i hope guys. no, not so fast. >> no. >> no. >> we'll see, we'll see. so far, so good. and there's no one better to keep us men in line than the indomitable dame andrea jenkyns, who i hear is very good at smashing balls. sorry. ed balls, is that right? i believe so, i believe so. well, now you all know how this goes. each

guest outlines their argument about a