it vetoes the security council in favor of israel and even the israeli propaganda line repeats its lies. the war in gaza has killed more than 17,000 people, including more than 7,000 children. 85 % of the residents of gaza have been displaced and more than 60% of the infrastructure has been destroyed. however, americans still believe that no one has tried harder than them to reduce the suffering of the people of gaza. azadeh taheri of radio and television news agency, the points that mrs. taheri mentioned in the report on the blank check, and we will certainly discuss about it during the conversation , i bid farewell to the viewers of yak sima. follow us on the news network.

mr. dr. kohken, i greet you. for the second time in the last two months, the united states vetoed the ceasefire in gaza. why did it do this? in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful, i am also at your service, dear viewers, greetings and respect. well, because the action of the united states in the veto of the new resolution. to understand the minimum resolution in this unfortunate situation in gaza, i think we should consider the factors affecting the decisions of the american government. in the decisions of the us regime, the most effective factors are the zainfuzi groups that influence the decisions of the government . these zainfuzi groups zionists in you it has a very significant power. and

they seriously use this power in news sources, in the media, in companies , and through it influence politicians. and they easily adopt this strange position that we are supporting the people of gaza. one remembers that painful picture that was published a few days ago, a palestinian father hugged his daughter and his little girl and said, "you are relieved now, his injured daughter had passed away, what the americans did to people." this is exactly what palestine is doing, that is, they want to kill everyone, they say, well, you will be relieved , otherwise the statement of the spokesperson of the us national security council has no meaning. the sources of power

that influence the government's decisions in america make americans go in this direction, that is, the reason for america's decision is mostly internal sources of power, and it is very interesting that they realize that they have all the standards that they pretend to adhere to and they put aside to claim human rights. they are completely abandoning the decisions of the international criminal court, they say we support them, they are abandoning them. about crime they are saying that we should make rules against humanity and war crimes, and these important rules are being ignored. they are the same ones who killed three children , or i don't know, in an unknown incident , terrorists did it or something else in an african country with less of the 50 killed, a special meeting of the security council was held and they said that we should intervene directly with the military, killing 7 thousand people.

they say that it is easy to ignore, it is a new child that they often interpret, they say that this is 17 years and 9 months and i don't know how many days it has been, it is still considered a child , we are talking about a 17-day-old child, right? 17 years and several months and everyone ignores this . this is more related to the sources of internal power in america and the ability of the zionists to influence the decisions of the united states government . mr. konani, it was mentioned in the report that the us has used its veto power for the benefit of the zionist regime twice in the last two months. he is doing in his own standards. shun

they claimed that it should be launched all over the world. yes , see. first of all, i would like to say hello to you and each and every one of the viewers of the program. i am very happy that i was able to reach you again. i believe. if you allow us, to discuss the right of veto and to understand the function of this institution of sexology and veto, its works are basically the philosophy of imitation , we must go back to the meaning that is common and popular in international literature and see this as a kind of reservation and a kind of right of bets . unfortunately, in the legal system of our own country, i still wish to thank you for saying the persian word along with it in order to preserve the persian language. unfortunately, in our domestic law literature , in order to be able to have a proper discussion about the functioning of the united nations charter, we were convinced that the ideal propositions that could be applied as the highest international norms of the common heritage of humanity in

today's contemporary world, unfortunately. we came to believe that the current contents of the united nations charter, which is the so-called law governing the united nations, any word and any interpretation that can be used according to taste, we think this is the highest limit and the desirable limit or the ethical limit and the end of the controversial part. can be called a i don't believe in favoring partiality in securing international interests, but considering that it is questionable both at the level of our own country and at the international level, that the same charter is used in the same language as the famous saying, and the same language is incomplete and this more imperfect contents are used as criteria, and when we talk about international authorities, when we talk about the functioning of the united nations, this

is the leading document as a basis . if it serves our interests, i repeat, one type of interests. we mean even that collective wisdom accept the participation of masai, for example, the interests of the 70 planets and us, that is to say, me plus the world, and the world besides me are very different. from a legal point of view, now you have the right to the so-called gender , which we must interpret in this way, which is basically devoid of it has made all the international standards that monitor the functioning of the united nations and its institutions empty of meaning and content, so it is not empty of promise to address the issue that i believe that governments like israel have an occupation regime , they are a kind of cattle quota from the right of veto, that is, i believe. i don't have to say in favor of israel, but we have to say that it happened israel is using its permanent quota , nearly 90% of the vetoes that the us is implementing are one-sided like the occupation regime of israel

, so it is clear that we need a literary wash, which means we need to change and change those lenses of looking at those pictures of international law that we understand, so as long as this mentality is there, you can be sure. that the united nations, no other institutions higher and bigger than the united nations, documents stronger than the current document, can establish today's world on the table of so-called compromise and peace. i also discuss the category of negation of peace. i hope that in the next years , mr. dr. kohken, you mentioned that the power sources of the american government will be directed towards supporting the zionist regime, and this will make it stand against many of the issues that it claimed. if we want to pay attention, america is currently involved in election contests and it has many domestic challenges

. this government is messing with him kane and election contests, well, this is a very important question because of the effect. they are using the media to censor the issue and show it in a different way. a few days ago, the debate was the last debate of the republicans this year, and in the previous debates, of course , among the four remaining candidates in this

debate, the issue was raised. gaza war, asking questions like the questions in the previous debates was, well, israel is caught in a crisis, how do you support it , look at the fact that killings are happening , this was not an issue at all, israel is caught in a crisis , how do you support it, and all four candidates saying that the palestinians should be destroyed in the previous debate. one of the candidates used a term that he said that we should erase this , as if, for example, the term is exactly this in english literature, for example, here is a speck of dust and this is what you wipe with a napkin . he used the same term for the nation and from this literature. they use the official media of the united states , they cover the same thing in general, you see the same thing in the social networks that belong to the americans, that is, the networks that i don't want to name now. i will go to the three main networks that america is supporting that's exactly what you say, the smallest thing against

, they say this is dangerous literature that should be removed, then he says, sir, i didn't say anything, i just wrote that they are killing like this, they themselves say they are killing, they say , well, they are killing, they have the right, you don't have the right, tell me if there is even a minimum of news. you can see it on the official networks . by the way, i believe it is because of the different voices that some of us support and the fear that these voices will be heard. whether it is heard from us or not , they are repeating a point, mr. doctor, that we are now pointing out, that, for example, in a period of time , election slogans about erasing, for example it was palestine, but now we are witnessing the holding of millions of demonstrations in the united states . i want to point this out. by the way, this is the domain of official politics , that is, the democrats say the same thing as the republicans in the last debate . pay attention to these words because they are very important. there is a point. we are in an era where some platforms are dogs that have different things, i don't want to name it

, there is one that the chinese support, in the last debate, one of the candidates said that we should close this at all, then he said why should you close 100 million they are using it in america, he said because the only reason he said is that they use this because anti-israeli things are not new, it's not just the news, every time they see 17, they become more anti-israeli, so we should. look, look, but the level of crime is so wide. i said that for 3 children , they will hold a meeting of the security council. 7,000 people were killed, obviously , without bringing anything to themselves. it is so wide that you can see that the issue is changing and you are seeing demonstrations. the last poll which has been done, more than 50 americans say, despite all these propaganda, sir, we must stop the war today today, we must stop the war, the effect it has on the american election. i want to say this precisely. look, in america, the real election competition

will start from the summer of next year, because the political memory of americans is short-term. well, the current government is strongly in favor of israel, but it hopes that the war will end soon, because in some states that mr. biden in the previous election , he won a very important state by a very small margin with 12,000 votes. that is why the united states regime is looking for an early war, of course, with their interpretation, which means the victory of these extreme zionists. let it be over well, on the ground, since this is not happening, they still say let's go and fight, mr. doctorani, we

are now seeing a minimal reaction from the international institutions, but a little more colorful than in the past, regarding the developments in the case due to the large scale of the killings and crimes of the zionist regime, secretary general this is the second time that the united nations has reacted and now it is asking for an emergency meeting. can we address the issue of whether the biden government or the netanyahu government is at odds with the positions or those in the united nations that we are now witnessing such positions from the united nations? you see, i basically do not believe in this, of course , i would like to point out that the type of performance and activism of the united states of america in the category of interference in the fate of wars, ceasefires, etc. as the famous saying goes, the military and civilian conflict between palestine and israel is not the only place, the first place, and the last place

where the united states of america is actively involved and active, and therefore i do not think it is fair that the politics and politicking and practical executive policies of the united states of america in the category of global management of the so-called war into areas such as election campaigns or the so-called wars of the common people daily jewelry, for example, today. the american political atmosphere is inflamed, the discussion of election activism , election propaganda, i believe it should not be reduced to this, the truth and legitimacy of the us military political strategy is based on the fact that the world without war is not good for the united states of america, please pay attention, nearly 63 a percentage of the world's military economy is in the hands of the united states, which means that if this country can define a power and an economic future for itself just by selling weapons and military equipment , there is no problem, so the united states wants applicants and interested in the armed conflict

, by the way, the word is foreign to the normative political and cultural dictionary of the united states of america. see, i do not have any pretense or pessimistic view or, as the famous saying goes, an imaginary enemy towards this issue at all. the documents show this, the facts show this, i am happy. some time ago, i was told by the management of al-fakhir company of sweden, iran, that there is a problem in the field of health in the way that america is active . they said that we have been working in the field of tobacco for years. what does it mean that he has come? the law explicitly states that a certain company, for example , should not offer tobacco products at all , immediately in a smaller container. since two months, dozens of exceptional laws allow this, i mean, i want to tell you that even the health of my people is being played with, so don't think that it is only in the category of war , basically, the activism of the united states of america is a special model of convulsions, that is, and now with this activism. what we are pointing out is that what we

see about the united nations secretary general is a political game or is it real ? with perfection. there is a war between israel and palestine . you see, the position of the united states is that i am against a ceasefire in this region, because it is potentially not actually aggressing a state called palestine and the local national government of palestine. it is assumed that you pay attention to this . i like this. let me remind you and dear listeners and those who are interested in this topic to really have a conversation about this issue . the united states of america's opposition to the ceasefire in palestine means that it considers the palestinian government to be an aggressor. this means that we, for example, international court remove the well-known international criminal code from the jurisdiction to deal with, for example , the possible crimes of the leaders, that is, we are considering isis. when

we want to oppose this category, why do we want to say that an actual government is an aggressor and this ceasefire is an indirect invitation to an operation? sabotage is in the future, that is, the meaning of opposing the ceasefire is that you are actually dangerous . i think basically, it is useless. you accept this nonsense from the secretary general of the united nations. throughout the history of the united nations, there is no role of any kind. in the statement and contents of the united nations charter , especially, there are no norms regarding the functioning of the security council, and i do not accept that we can reach the conclusion that the united nations is now in agreement with the protection of the rights of the palestinian people, because of the world today. i am al-shams, who is the aggressor, in any case, it is realistic, of course, i must say this too

, i believe that if the secretary general had taken a different position, it would have been in different ways, maybe out of the 10 positions that you could get it. in this category , considering the weakest, worst and most clumsy model of america's relationship with israel-palestine tension, mr. kunani, i think that mr. jalodarian, our reporter, who always replaces persian equivalents, warns that our program will put us under a lot of pressure tonight. let's use farsi words, mr. dr. koh kekneh, let's talk about the fact that from the beginning of the al-aqsa storm and now until today, when about two months of this war have passed in gaza, more than two months of the war in gaza, we see that many countries that his people were not aligned with palestine the people of gaza are holding demonstrations

, they are shouting for palestinian ideals, stop the war. for many years, the united states regime has based many of its foreign policy actions on the legitimization of human rights, the creation of peace and security , and one of its latest events was the events in ukraine. we don't want to talk about ukraine anymore. do you want the people of, for example, germany. convince him that he should use less gas, tolerate more cold , pay more for your food and remove many things from your shopping list. why? because we are involved in a war with ukraine, how can you legitimize this, even though human rights are being violated, war crimes are happening. this

month, i was looking at the statistics. for example , last month, 5 civilians died in the bombing, this was the last thing. which was in the time before al-akhsa storm, that is, there is one month left for this operation on 15 mehr , 5 people. civilians in ukraine, so we must go and support ukraine at any cost, you too among our people, we have to be patient, but we are seeing that the west puts all this aside and comes here, which openly says that 17,000 people die, that it is okay to die, these are the minimum, those who are still under the buildings , those who are injured. which cannot be repaired or in hospitals where no services are provided will be gradual. let them stay. this is at least 7 thousand children . look

, i say this word a lot. we watch the news and we start to cry. what kind of humanity is this ? after all, the people of the world see this and protest, saying, "sir, it was supposed to be different, what are you doing?" . well, it's not just america, britain, as a country that fixed the problem of palestine at all, voted gratefully for this resolution. the biggest demonstration after the second world war happened in london because of palestine , not once, many times, despite all the regulations that were put in france and germany were the same, despite coming to say if you are the first to take this position if you protest, we will do such and such with you, with all this. why, because the level of crime is very high, and who is the leader of this incident, the united states? an important effect of this issue

is the delegitimization of the actions and words of the united states. look, during this time , how many western organizations, which are exactly according to the agenda of the americans and the westerners, have until the other issue was brought to the headlines, none of it received any attention in the world , because they say that you are justifying war crimes and crimes against sharia when it is obvious that the rest of your words have no validity. this legitimacy it is a very important event to change the foreign policy of the united states and the agenda of the foreign policy of the united states, and for this reason, you can be sure that as soon as every war ends , the war will end. you should forget this because this is a very narrow point in the performance of westerners in international politics. very good mr. dr. ebrahim motaghi, an expert on international issues , mr. motaghi is also added to our group. i greet

you. have a good time. to the dimensions of foreign policy, domestic policy and what the american veto is the issue of the gaza ceasefire focuses on these issues . we talked about what the us is doing regarding the developments in gaza and its support for the zionist regime, not only regarding the al-aqsa storm and the past two months, but what is it doing all the time? hello to you and your dear guests, i would like to thank you for your presence. america's policy in relation to israel is a very strategic issue. israel is part of the united states' operational space. it is considered a regional environment. if you pay attention, we will come to the conclusion that even israel is included in the collection

it belongs to the kaman tradition, or the central command force . but the situation that the united states has found today in relation to israel, credibility. it will destroy american politics for many years. americans always talked about democracy . always talking about human rights. but the gaza war reflected the realities of american foreign policy . it showed that the most important issue for the americans is their power strategy and israel's strategy. it is interesting to note here that even the european countries in relation

to the resolution that the united arab emirates had proposed, even they have a completely different opinion. being different today, the most important issue that exists, we can examine it in getresh's literature . when getresh raises the issue of article 99 of the united nations charter, it means that the israelis took advantage of very violent measures, in no way an issue. it is related to their actions and their actions are not mutual. the third point is that with victory

, there is a possibility of escalation of crisis. if we want to realistically use these weak provisions of the charter, we can really see how america acts in terms of approving international war crimes of genocide in its real and international sense. let's analyze it . it is not far from the mind that we can define the responsibility for the united states that you are fueling the increase of anti-human consequences of these armed conflicts in the gaza strip . and tomorrow

it needs to inject some rationality of humanity and realistic honor into itself in the way of looking at international standards in the way of dialogues and those global understandings . conflicts are more severe than this we will have conflicts, we had them in korea , we had them in china, and in many other countries . americans learn very late in the crises that happen in our region and unfortunately they take decisions too late. the 206 lebanon war is a clear example. after the 15th day of the war, the thing that dragged it to the 33rd was the pressure of the united states that you must achieve a victory, and the field here has shown that victory will not happen. the foreign policy that we adopted and the government. in level of

the president at the level of the foreign minister and other foreign policy activists undertook that the american effort to legitimize the action of hamas and turn it into an international discourse of terrorist action, we actually prevented it for the first time, and then it became an international agenda, i.e. americans do not expect anyone to say that hamas is a terrorist and so on in the resolutions even of the united nations. this shows that the vision is not going according to the wishes of the americans, and i don't think that the americans will benefit from this field. thank you for your analysis . i say goodbye to both of you. thank you to dr. motaghi for accompanying us on the phone. thank you as always.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, ladies and gentlemen , welcome. welcome to the world. today, i, hosni sadat shabiri , will accompany you in this program for an hour. 120 years of relations between iran and latin america, from the opportunities and commonalities to the damage and obstacles , the topic we are talking about in the world today , and we also talk with the guests of the program about the palestinian issue as one of the issues.