in tehran, sunset is at 17:00 , maghrib call to prayer is at 17:23, and midnight is at 23:24. now we will go to the economic table and join mr. bozor nast, my dear colleague . i say hello. we are with you. in the name of god , i say hello to you, dear colleague ms. mirsane. i offer my greetings, courtesy and respect to all the viewers of the economic table program. happy eid. okay, in continuation of the special election program that we

are holding at the economy table, today we want to talk about the special side of the export of jalizi products, if you are interested, join us for this discussion. be and follow us from khabar network . please be a viewer. thank you. you are with the economy table. i told you that the topic of our agenda today is the tariff on jalizit products. let's talk a little bit about the agenda . these events that are happening these days , one of the points that the leadership emphasized a lot in their recent meetings is that in the elections of a real competition should be formed , according to him, real competition is one of the pillars of the election and what it means, in the sense that all views, all different political tastes. economic and cultural expression and in

this election, which is a big competition let them enter this field and compete in this real competition. one of the issues that have a lot of pros and cons is the discussion about the export of commercial products. some people say that no, the government should not come and impose a tariff on this, if the tariff is so high that it is an exporter. if he can't come or the farmer can't produce and export these, and the events that happen to him and prevent him, he should let him free. these two views have this difference of opinion. there are many points of view on both sides that we want to discuss today at the economy table. before i introduce the guests to your service and go to our discussion , i invite you to go to the report that my colleagues in the agriculture department of sed and sima news agency. let's prepare together, let's come back and start our conversation.

the implementation of the 100% tariff increase on the export of jalazi products in bahman 1401 was accompanied by reactions from the activists of the agricultural economy , it brought supporters and opponents. hashemi, member of the coordination council of agricultural sector organizations. it is necessary to add definitions to the export of mesh products that the price the export of these products should be more than the world price. new distortions of the export of mesh products are necessary, even up to 300 increase. fotokian, a member of the academic faculty of shahid university, it is essential that the water and soil resources of the country serve the production of strategic crops such as wheat and canola, and considering the beginning of the cropping season , it is necessary for the government to take the necessary measures to increase this deviation from half to more than 100. strategic products should not be delayed. the survey of an agricultural economy expert currently shows that 754 thousand hectares are used for the production of jalizi products , if it is used for the production of wheat and canola in the country.

3.3 million tons of these products will be produced, which will save one and a half billion dollars. on the other hand, hojjat vermzaiei, the director of the agricultural department of the islamic council research center, generally says that setting a high export tariff for mesh products is not the right thing to do. first of all, it should be checked how many percentages of the cultivated land are occupied by netting products, which has been focused on this issue. the way to sustainable self-sufficiency. suppressing products is not a joke. mohammad shafi malekzadeh, executive director of the country's chamber of agriculture. production of strategic products due to cost high and current prices are not economical. for this reason , there is no other choice but to produce jalizi products, and eventually the surplus must be exported. sadruddin niavarani, vice president of the national union of agricultural products. the increase in export tariffs means stopping and preventing the export of products. because no goods. there is no 100% profit

for which the exporter wants to pay this tariff. ali akbar abbasi, sed and broadcasting news agency. we saw ali akbar abbasi's report together. it was a review of the opinions of the supporters and opponents of the discussion that we are having today here in the studio of mr. niavarani's economic desk, the vice president. the national union of agricultural products , as you saw in the report , is against the definition of the export of jarizi products , as well as mr. najafi, a university professor and an expert in agricultural economics who is on the opposite side . mr. niavarani, basically, why are you against the tariff exemption from the export of jalizi products? with greetings and courtesy to all the people of iran, your excellency , i congratulate mother's day and women's day to all the women and women of our country, and i congratulate

our farmers and businessmen who are in this field. they are active and i offer my condolences. sardar soleimani and i hope that on this day, the families of all the martyrs will be the attention of all the people of our country . yes, we have felt and seen bans on agricultural products in the past through subordinate organizations such as the jihad of agriculture or the ministry of industry. the export trade of some products would be stopped. we generally say that we should have exports or not. if it is the opinion of the supreme leader and the opinion of the government that we should have exports , this export should be supported. exports

cannot be online or offline. they should be stopped. if it is connected, the export should continue continuously , considering that we have raised these issues for years. thank god, it was decided in the parliament and in the ministry of home affairs to stop the ban on exports, but today we see that the benefits they are giving are in a way the same as bans and restrictions on exports. it can be done , our consumer can take it from the product and return it to the consumer. it is very good.

prohibition of export restrictions to make a product behind another product and from the country excluding these 100 is a mistake and this type of tariff setting should be collected. you agree with the tariff , provided that it is expert, yes and no, in all cases, in the cases that should be defined , for example, the cases that should not have a definition are in the net box that we look now, now we have a large amount of jalizi products, for example, apples in the country's warehouses, the price has come down to five or six tomans, you

know, this is no longer money for transportation and you know the price, and you don't ask for anything, this should not have a definition , zero at all, zero all zero products in one or two cases that onions are prohibited in the market inside jihad , well, this is my expert opinion, we have red onions , we have white onions, we have pickled onions, we have different types , now our white onions are in abundance, the price has reached 10 11 tomans, and no one buys it, if it is not exported, the farmer will be destroyed thank you mr. najafi. do you also agree with mr. niavari or not, do you think that the tariff should be this way, this wide , and basically, it should not be in the way that mr. niavari refers to, that it should be on one or two products, in the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, i am at your service. to serve all the dear people of iran everywhere

i would like to say hello to our country, i hope they are doing well and their days are going to work . let's give a criticism and a reference to the trade. you can see that countries usually follow one or two strategies in order to balance their trade balances. either they go towards the development of exports , so that they can control or improve their trade balances through export promotion and increasing exports, or they go towards import substitution, which means that they produce products that they did not produce before or if their production is low. now they are going to replace them. look at the countries that actually have a free economy and the price mechanism is powerful enough to go in this direction to expand exports. but countries

like our country, where we have a series of challenges with the world around us, and we are also facing sanctions, or things like this have been tried, for example , in fact, the view is that as far as possible, we replace imports let's solve our problem. the tariff we left. for jalizi products, i will offer this to you, see the whole the cultivated area of ​​jalizi products, plus our vegetables , which are now known as less essential products , is 600,000 hectares. now , depending on the number of years, it may be a little more or less. these 600,000 hectares are 10% of our water cultivated area. it means that we have a total of 6 and a half million hectares of irrigated land, 10 % of which is irrigated. the production of green and vegetable products has been allocated. when you look

at it, it is not a large volume in the whole country, but there is a point that in the last crop year of 1400 1401, which the order was published, it is actually 22 million tons. our products are from the field of sifi and jalizi vegetable products. if i look closely at the statistics, it is 78 million , which means that this share is 28 of our production , so the point is that, in terms of quantity , we did not allocate a lot of land to summer vegetable crops, but in other words, the high quality of these lands they are allocating the land that we have in the country, which is almost 2 million hectares. there is a land of 600,000 hectares dedicated to safi vegetables and vegetable products. let's have a meal

let's put our minds closer, for example, if we plant wheat on this land, it will rain more . well, you see, naturally, this is what you do when you dedicate your first-class land to green vegetables and jalizi products. these cash products allow the farmer to reach a very high income in a much shorter period of time. it is attractive for merchants or other supply chain actors to enter this field. these are so-called crab crops or cash crops. in all places the world also has this attraction for the cultivation and trade of these products. but the point is that we are a country with special conditions , that is, we are facing strange sanctions , we are facing a lot of good times. on the other hand, in fact , we face a lot of phenomena and problems . we are naturally in a water-scarce area. our water crisis

is getting worse day by day . our export can't reach a safe point and a stable point in the field of agriculture food and agricultural business is a point that we should think more about. for these reasons , we should define it . let's see the terms and conditions. we determine whether to support our basic products or not . we adjust the tariff in order to regulate the domestic market . did we inform zinef before that , or did we not inform our traders, or did we not inform our farmers? they say that there should be two products for the same product, and it is in percentages, not like

this. do you accept this percentage? look, see , we have a wide variety of products, maybe. it is not necessary for us to set a tariff for all of them, because there are already many of them. you agree that, for example, it should be on one product or not, for example, in this way, these few products that are so-called less valuable in our food basket will be allocated quality land for themselves. they can control the giving of these if they have a tariff. and in the decision of the farmer to make changes, well, you accept this, yes , look, let me tell you something, in their orders , we talk about trade and commerce, see , when we talk about the trade of food and agricultural products, well, that site is completely different. we are going to see what products we have in short supply today . just like they said, the country should think about it or we should go there. we should not put any restrictions and let if there is less onion imported today

, there will be less apple imported in the future and control. let's do our market with satisfaction and demand, that is, the market. he takes care of himself. if we come , we will limit the import of this product because we have excess production. our production overflow is usually exported abroad. we export products that we do not have many production methods we don't have we have products that are usually stored and collected when they are not exported, which harms the farmer. look, i don't agree with this at all. this is the discussion.

so that we don't see such results, they want to force the farmer to regulate their own domestic market. if anyone wants to answer for the financial loss of the farmer, he should do so. look, i am not talking about merchants today, i am the representative of a large part of the country's exporters, but today , their contracts are suspended abroad , they have to bear the loss, they have to bear a part of their money , and they are not given their money, which the government is saying today. all these problems are for the merchant, but i say that my merchant knows how to bear the loss, but our farmer is too weak to be able to handle such volumes in a one- day circular of 100 non-expert tariffs, because

the type is not known, and now it's 15 days. most of bandar abbas onion arrives in the market. in any case, it is possible to be dissatisfied with this sector and work, mr. najafi , if we don't do this now, we will lose more, or if we impose a tariff , it will not be produced. whether we import or export , it doesn't make any difference for business. these things are not generally liked anywhere in the world. it's not overnight . they say that they clarified our law 6 months ago . there is no debate on this part of the case. i mean you. it is quite clear that the government should not do such a thing. naturally , this farmer has gone to all expenses. he has made it heavy for the cultivation of his crops, these are the costs, especially

the summer vegetables, there are very high costs in ekdar . we assume the notification time here. look, if this is properly communicated to the farmer, and let's say, for example, our strategy is changing from next year, we want to plan for these crops, well, naturally, the farmer will not plant our crops, but this has not happened anymore, but see this happening, not because i am bold to add. look, we closed the hands and wings of the government through the parliament so that a minister cannot order to ban a product. they came from that side 6 months ago and announced that this year we want to create restrictions, then now they came to give us a tip because the ban has been banned, no, no. the relationship with this party was announced today from saturday to thursday. on saturday morning, the letter arrived at

the port, and maybe 50 to 80 containers in each port. each of which contained 20 tons or 25 tons of goods from tomatoes and onions, they were stopped and some of their goods were damaged, some were damaged, after maybe a week to 10 days, they were allowed to go out with their plan, so that everyone suffered and this we do not confirm it at all. i said it last time. the last time it came to everyone's knowledge six months ago. we had many plans here that the export tariff of jarizi products was imposed in this way, which means that the farmer should have been aware of this. now their argument

is the same, they say that if we do not have onions , there will be a shortage of onions because the farmer does not work, because of the crime of sir, this has been observed 6 months ago. we don't have such an export, or you don't have plans for your export markets. naturally, this cannot be illegal if it was properly informed 6 months ago, but what i heard is that we don't have the illegal discussion, mr. niavarani, this is not a good thing at all, which means you shouldn't do this. create such a restriction for agriculture you should not put tariffs on his products. now

we are having a heated discussion. no, i agree with tariffs . see why we agree with agricultural products . see, because it is at the farm level, there is a terrible difference between our products in the form of cartoons. 90 if agriculture went to blue potatoes. and he used to cultivate 9 times wheat per hectare , he gets this profit. this is as a result of abandoning the policy in the agricultural sector . if for some reason, so-called 1%, if i reach a good market , it will compensate all my expenses, but you see, this is not true , for example, the countries of the world have such a cartoon difference between their products at the farm level. for some years, for example, you see that now one of them, i think

, is part of the routine programs and routine reports of sadasima, which goes, for example, to some place in the south of kerman province, in hormozgan province, and shows saifi vegetable products, eggplant and other things that they are thrown away and the farmer is complaining that no one buys these products from us people who went bankrupt because of this. the really sudden and actually one-time reactions that the government is showing in order to solve the problem, all of this is due to an abandoned policy in the last decade, which makes our basic products lose their appeal in the basket . the farmer's loss is the reason why you , for example, all of a sudden, farmers tend to produce a series of products that eventually face such an excess at the farm level or at the market level

of basic products in order to make this ratio fair and so on. make the ratio rational because basic goods also have a specific place and role in the farmer's production pattern , so you have taken the view that if we focus so much on, for example, in the field of agriculture , we will have to import basic agricultural products. yes, this has happened. you can say, i will ask you the same question. see, our trade balance in the field of agricultural products was at a time in the beginning of the 80s with a minus of two tenths of a billion dollars. now our trade balance in 1401 has reached a minus of 132 billion dollars. what does this mean? that we have the country is completely dependent on imports . another point is that once we export agricultural products , you say that you still have basic duties. now in the field of agriculture, i will

say how basic it is in general. if we want to be precise, see one thing. a major part of the import of our hats, i think it is more than 60 or 70%. now , i did not get the exact statistics to share with you, but i want to tell you one more thing. see, at one time , for example, in every kilogram of food that we exported it has earned us half a dollar a year 1401, this has reached 63 hundredths of dollars , which is less than half, but from now on, we have to take 7 tenths of dollars for every kilogram of imported goods out of the country. agricultural products are completely lost and we have. one by one, we are moving towards a series of products that do not have a place in the food basket of the world and our business partners

. we should think about this, and when we look at the trade of agricultural products in a so-called yellow and abandoned way, we will not. we can control the discussion regarding the omelette, it has become uncontrollable. yes , in my opinion, my help is getting out of control. if this discussion is about removing the width of 40 bread, i have the statistics here . the ministry itself presented a statistic here in 1400. i think this is unprecedented in history. our negative was 30 and a half million. we imported tons of food into the country. this will contradict our production statistics, which brought the trade balance to a negative of almost 12 billion dollars in that year, while our export in the same year was, for example, 5 billion dollars, last year it was 5.2 billion. it was a tenth of a billion dollars, that is even in terms of weight, our exports have not decreased much, but our imports are not in a very good situation

, which is why the statistics depend on many things, when most of our imports are wheat, barley, corn , and food products. we export very little raw material, very little. this statistic cannot be accurate and we

can compare it. we buy an order from the other side and there is no support for the farmer we don't do it either, and the farmer is producing mike and in the markets for a moment, just me because we had reports of hearing terrible sounds in the area of ​​my presence, sahib al-zaman mosque on the road leading to golzara in kerman. and their further reports to see what the situation is going to be. we will be at your service at the economy desk. in the name of god , the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings, dear viewers , respected colleagues. the main point of the matter is that an explosion was heard on the way to golzara, kerman , because the details to know more

, i will talk with mr. fallah. red crescent ceo kerman province, mr. falah, hello , please tell us more details and respect, unfortunately, in front of the victory , along the path of kerman martyrs gulzar, a voice was heard that the kerman mountain team was present in the region and this reaction is now concealing the wounded and the people who were injured. we are from the region , well, the wave of the crowd is very high and the work is also very difficult . now the routes are directed towards golzar shahada , god willing, he will be able to provide you with more detailed information. right now, you are at the scene of another incident. yes, yes, now it is clear what happened. in spite of everything

god willing, if nothing happens to our compatriots, we will continue our conversation until their next communication . mr. niavarani, you said that basically this procedure is good or not . our farmers usually have double crops, for example , you see a farmer who is planting wheat, barley, and rapeseed in a part of his field.

it is from my farm.