let us be proud with the most crowded prayers in addition to imamzadeh and the blessed bekaa in university spaces . thank you very much, mr. dr. rostam. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, ladies and gentlemen, hello , welcome to the world. today, i am hosni sadat shabiri and i will accompany you in this program for one hour . developments in palestine, from

hezbollah's rocket responses in lebanon to the evaluation of the popularity of hamas in the latest polls, the subject of the first case of the world program today, in the second case, this question experts of the program, i ask why the prime minister of iraq said about the new plan of his government to finalize the complete withdrawal of america from this country, whether this issue will be realized. i want you to accompany today's world until the end. the zionist regime's air surveillance base under fire from hezbollah. the duty of miren base is to monitor and supervise. according to

the aerial information of the skies of several countries, lebanon's hezbollah targeted them with 62 missiles. lebanon's hezbollah targeted the miron air surveillance control base of the zionist regime, which was located in the heights of jarmaq, the highest mountain in the north of the occupied territories, by firing 62 missiles of various types. this in addition to controlling and monitoring air information in the skies of lebanon, syria, turkey and cyprus , the base was also the main base of the zionist military in the north of the occupied territories in electronic warfare. this was the beginning of the first response to the terrorist operations of the zionist regime in the southern suburbs of beirut and the martyrdom of saleh al-arouri.

they targeted this air control base, 10 kilometers north of sha ta shab lands. the zionist regime's artillery also attacked eight areas in southern lebanon, including khayyam, with prohibited phosphorus bombs . hasan azimzadeh of sed and sima news agency near the border between lebanon and occupied palestine. about issues i am talking about palestine and the latest developments with mr. mustafa moslehzadeh, an expert on international issues, who is with us at studio

jahan today . the first question is about the importance of the miron base . i want to ask you how important this base is to the zionists. direction attack and information logistics department, at least, of course , there are other logistics departments, but let's divide information logistics. naturally, the parts that

go back to information logistics, all those military measures are formed based on this information logistics. if israel loses this information logistics, whether america is the main director of the battle or the israeli government itself as one of the forces in the line. moghadam is fighting, this information logistics is very important for them, that's why i think that because of this, hezbollah tried from the beginning of the war , that if it was in the news and in the film the ones that hizbullah deliberately spread were arranging the israeli intelligence towers, that is, now is the time when hizbullah tried to attack the towers, that during these 3 months , hizbollah hit a large number of towers in the northern areas of israel, but the base that logistics has the information. this

is much more important than a deck because i think that it is somehow blind and... leaving a hole . lebanon's hizbollah's attacks on the bases of the zionist regime are continuing, do you think? we can say that lebanon's hezbollah's response to the zionist regime has entered a new phase, a change has taken place, and this can affect the outcome of this war. i can't name it as a strategic change , that is, in your opinion , not much change now is a strategic change, but a tactical change, that is, i

will discuss these two types of changes if it becomes necessary later, because in the case of the united states, the same issue is raised in the case of europe. this is the same issue , i can give a more comprehensive statement. i will address it, but as in fact, to hit israel a little more, for example, let's assume that it is just from the base attacking the information logistics base is more important, but not in the sense that a strategic change has occurred . what do you mean by strategic change in the party's strategy? god, there must be a change in this conflict . please explain this. the tactics are actually possible to change and the strategy is hezbollah's big view of this conflict. well, you see, the strategic change comes from the fact that we

are facing a big fire in the region. let's actually decide to call this a big fire. shu became the so-called myself as a big fire let's go and see that strategy. if the region is going to suffer a big fire, which of course israel wants this to happen, see . for a month, every attack that the yemenis made on israeli ships , the americans did not respond, even to the israeli bases, which were actually in the port of eilat, but

the americans did not respond, even the israelis did not respond, they only intercepted, that is, the american navy. they are intercepting saudi arabia in the red sea saudi arabia was intercepting, egypt was intercepting , as the representatives of that super power that was in charge of directing the war , they were trying to reduce the amount of damage to israel and did not want to spread the fire of war, but why did america not respond to because america had many auspicious names for it if the war turned into that big fire. even the americans themselves try not to show their presence in the war. you know that the americans regularly send weapons

to israel every day. i mean , i think i was reading a report from yediot ahranot himself for you to see for example, regularly. tank bullets, heavy bombs , aviation , drones, equipment, this is not an anti-israeli report . by all means, a huge process

of arms transfer from america to israel is taking place every day during these 90 days, which i think is very rare in the history of america . a heavy traffic of equipment. america, whose effort was not to create a big fire, that is, america's strategy was to reach its strategic goals as much as possible. now i will mention that without that big fire, because neither america was ready for this, now if you want, i have to explain why america was not ready for this big fire in the region, nor israel.

they are directly involved in this battle . is there any difference? in my opinion, there is no difference because

the zionist regime's war room is run by the americans . so, first , let's take a quick look at the strategy of america and israel. in your opinion, it is different. a quick look reveals that the american strategy is to destroy a hamas-run gaza . if hamas is not destroyed, at least hamas will be able to manage it

if hamas is taken, this limit means that we have a strategy floor, a strategy ceiling , now it's better to use this word instead of pelekan . it didn't happen, this shoe should happen , if not, in fact, the other side of this strategy is that gaza should reach the minimum number of inhabitants , the discussion of moving you, moving this, the us was looking for it in the first month, that is, the us ambassador to lebanon went regularly, of course not. obviously , he went to egypt very often to force egypt to accept these immigrants egypt refused to accept gaza, went to jordan to accept the immigrants, but did not accept, went to

saudi arabia, my saudi, this is of course because they are not against the american strategy, but because they know that the presence of the people of gaza in their country will cause changes in their country, that is, they are worried about this, but mr. masehzadeh, please allow me to to come to a conclusion in the first grand strategy, which was to destroy hamas in about 3 months , means that the problem with america's strategy is that this is exactly israel's strategy. i mean , israel's strategy is nothing but the destruction of hamas, exactly now, then i will tell you what is the difference between them because a number of authors of articles, both in iran and abroad, point to the difference between israel and america, i want to say that this is not a strategic difference, that is, israel is the same , that is, the destruction of

hamas, that is the ceiling of the strategy. a copy of america's strategy. caste and the departure of people from gaza so that gaza can be controlled, see why it says that at least one million people will leave gaza, of course, up to half a million, america was in its program at that time, but it also had a minimum and maximum, at least one person , one million people from gaza. going to gaza is quite possible control, the control that i mentioned wants to be taken from hamas, naturally, who wants to be given it, now there were different options, or to give it to the autonomous region, for example , no, in reality, but if

we consider it as step one, then this happened . in a short period of time, it means that in america's strategy, it was not supposed to last more than a month . or two weeks of work in north yemen or yamaa or yemen now, i don't want to say the government , i want to say the government. the same north yemen, now i think this is a better term, the government of ansarullah , i think it will be completed in a week or two , but this calculation was during the eight-year war with iran, didn't saddam think that it would take an average of seven days to reach tehran and he told that reporter that when the reporter asked saddam

, don't think that, just calculate the saddams, that means you should be sure that these are the consultations that they have in the american strategy with iraq, that you will come to tehran for a week, and he told that reporter that i i will answer your question in tehran. reviewing contemporary history , there are a lot of these american calculation errors, that is , there were also in the discussion of the victory of the islamic revolution, but let's go back to the discussion of lebanon and lebanon's hezbollah. my question was whether lebanon's hezbollah has entered a new stage and the future of this conflict. it will change with the entry of hezbollah . i also mentioned the news. you mentioned america and israel, you said that it was not reached, my question is that a new front is opening in lebanon and now lebanon is responding, what do you think will change in the future? let's figure out why israel entered this process , which from your point of view is a new development, an expansion of jeddah

, yes, that means terror in lebanon, terror in iran , terror in syria and... the attack on iraq means something that in that first month, america was completely cautious. he used to answer neither iraq nor yemen , he answered both of them at this distance , he made such a decision because you said that he did not want a big fire, why did this happen ? in addition , america is not interested in that big fire because it is not interested, we explained the reason. israel is not capable of it there is a big fire to deal with it, and america is forced to enter, and when america is forced to enter, it will be a repetition of the incidents that happened in syria, in syria 2011, in yemen 2014, 15 in iraq 2014. america has experienced this once, so why is it happening again now? so this is a paradox, i

mean, in fact, i want to solve this paradox in these talks . if i don't know how much i can pay in this distance, at this stage , when america is a superpower that naturally designs processes, you can see the role of planning. these designs are very important if they are enough for a power like america according to you, the world's top military power, the world's top economic power , its top power has entered into this conflict, that is, the world's top military power , the world's top economic power has designed a plan and it did not reach it in 3 months, which was not supposed

to reach a month at all, but 3 months. this is a very heavy blow for this super power that has no rival in the world compared to the power it has, so what should be done now . there are two ways ahead of him, one way is to enter that great fire, which he knows he experienced once , of course, he experienced it at the time of martyr soleimani. there is no martyr soleimani , which means that america's strategies may say that during the time of martyr soleimani , the plenum was defeated, that is, the plenum was defeated in syria, which means that the americans almost won the syrian game by 85-15 . this is a very heavy defeat for the americans , who became 15 in 15 85 and the same process happened in iraq again, and martyr soleimani stood in front of

them and gave the whole of iraq, kurdistan, iraqi kurdistan, and all of this at the hands of america. i want experience with the assassination of martyr soleimani. they thought they could get these fronts according to what they calculated. well, that's it one of the items is, in fact, they have a feeling that suleiman the martyr. an extraordinary general had said this, meaning the us defense minister or the first deputy, because it was in the past, i don't remember now , around 2015, a meeting between saudi arabia and this high-ranking american official. you don't die they told them that you should find someone like martyr soleimani in the region, that we will put martyr soleimani in front of

you so that you can find a person like general soleimani. let's let him stand in front of him. whoever stands in front of him is defeated. see, this was normal . you know that centcom is the commander of centcom, and martyr soleimani is the commander of centcom in every battle against martyr suleiman. it failed in 90 syria . from shahid soleimani, maybe a discourse is working here and is playing its role. yes, but well , we should look from the american perspective, not look at it. we ourselves from strat's point of view. americans should see that he feels that the resistance front had an extraordinary general who was unparalleled in

the entire region . now he does not have that general from the point of view of american strategies. if we don't say the preliminaries, that's why i said it, maybe there won't be a chance, this has a preliminaries. you are analyzing when the issue of isis tools was in the hands of america and they were behind isis. and you compare that the commander of centcom was against sardar soleimani and now he is sardar soleimani was assassinated by the americans, but they still can't carry out their own plans in the region

. in your opinion , how is the atmosphere in that operation room now ? he said, look at the gaza war again , 2008 is the first gaza war, 2012 is the second gaza war. the third war in gaza is getting shorter. 2019 is the fourth war. these are the four wars of the time of martyr soleimani. in all four wars, the commander of sandcom has been defeated by martyr soleimani. so, be careful, what is happening now ? now it is coming in 2023. first of all, there is no shahiz soleimani. this is the second item, america has decided to do what it could not do with the most difficult and catastrophic and in fact the most extensive massacre in gaza.

do it during the period of martyr soleimani. see, this was never done during the time of martyr soleimani. in the case of gaza, in all the wars of 2008, 2012, 2014, 2019, he absolutely did not do this, that is, this massive massacre in gaza , and that you cut off the water, that is, all the water centers. visit the bakeries , visit the hospitals, visit the entry of food was completely closed for a while, israel opened after a while when it suffered an international bombast. for a long time, the people of gaza have been using the same small reserve that was in gaza, whether it was water, bread, or medicine, and i am waiting for your conclusion until we know these preparations .

one month's food work is over, according to this, it means that people can't bear it at all with that pressure .

bombs of 1 ton and 2 tons. well, america did not believe that this strategy would fail. well, now this strategy has failed. be careful, this super power, who designs big plans , now, can he go to that heavy fire , the big fire, no, he still wants that big fire, no, he is not going to south lebanon, well, no, if he wanted to go to that big fire, he should have gone in a different way. . an attack that the us does not go to the big fire , even if you look at a yemeni boat, for example, the one that hit the yemeni boat, killing about 10 yemenis . if america wanted to go to the big fire, it should have bombed zana, the big fire is me. in order to conclude the discussion, mr. mohsenzadeh, i want to know that in your opinion, america is now considering that he has not reached his goals in these 3 months and as the main supporter of the zionist regime and also.

lebanon's hezbollah, which has opened a front in this country and launched heavy attacks , was also mentioned at the beginning of the news . how do you see the prospects of these two groups and the future of this conflict ? well, i want to say that the second stage of this strategy or, in fact, if i refer to the base of the thing that i mentioned, the stair step strategy is to increase the threat to america a little bit, but it can't do more to gaza, well , it can't do more to gaza, which means that gaza is actually the boiling point of my strategy has been called the ashba level. now, my term is that the term i use for food is that america has brought gaza to the strategic boiling point . it is not possible to get higher than this at all. this strategic boiling point did not work. so now, without

he wants to reach that big fire in places. show me that this show of power is nothing but a big fire. this show of power is that an assassination in syria is an assassination. be careful. it is not going to take a big action that will lead to that big fire and an assassination in lebanon. look at that. this exactly the same point measures, if you want to name it, next to that strategic boiling point , the points that the strategic boiling point that did not work in gaza defines a boiling point, in the same layer other than the big fire, enter these points into these strategic boiling points it does, that is, it makes a dot in lebanon, it makes a dot, pay attention again , it's all dots, it makes a dot , it makes a dot in iran.