four motorcycles and 38 agricultural machines are offered in this auction . applicants can view the specifications and details of the goods offered in the auction after visiting the organization's website at the address of the theme or referring to the iran procurement headquarters system. the documentary 400

kilometers on the other side will be aired on 18:00 on january 21st. 400 kilometers on the other side is a story of iraqi sunni and shia youth supporting the palestinian people, which will be broadcast on sima for the first time. this documentary made by mojtaba minavand tells the story of the sit-in and gathering of iraqi people on the border with jordan support them. yat narrates the storm of al-aqsa . mr. iranshahr's book was unveiled at the fourth khursheed conference in iranshahr city. this book contains the memories of the presence of the supreme leader of the revolution in the years before the victory of the islamic revolution in the iranshahr region and his jihadi activities. the dear city of iran is a city for me. a shining point in the memories of the past

is in 1356 during the revolutionary struggles, ayatollah khamenei was exiled to iranshahr. in savak's opinion, exile was a great punishment, but it turned into a far-reaching and self-inflicted course, the result of which is now here. mr. iranshe's book is a book written by rahim makhdumi the result of 80 interviews with friends. and the companions of those years . in a few days, a small example of islamic government is going to be formed here. a completely spontaneous and popular government, the place of activity of the supreme leader is a mosque named al rasool. interestingly , this mosque is delivered with 10 worshipers and delivered with 200 worshipers, which means 20 times the number of worshipers. the memories of al rasool mosque were first narrated in the book khond deli ke lal shod. and what follows in mr. iranshahr's book

is the story of the restoration of al rasool mosque. woe to those who know and act according to their ideas they do not. among other events that are important is that a flood will happen in iranshahr. in a very short period of time , the position of supreme leader has very little planning, the relationship he has with provinces and cities. the flood of people's aid and the flood of jihadi forces are flowing to iran, the city of every jihadi work and initiative in the field of job creation is one of the activities of the leader of the revolution in those years and in that region. i didn't feel alienated in iranshahr in 1956 and 1957. a presence that becomes a bright spot in shared memories. shared memories of residents and mr. iranshahr. mithra labafi

radio news agency, the next part of the news of the hour. in the name of allah, the merciful, the merciful, ladies and gentlemen, hello , welcome to the world. today, i am hosni sadat shabiri , and i will accompany you in this program for an hour . the latest developments in palestine, from

lebanon's hezbollah missile responses to the assessment of hamas's popularity in the latest polls, are the subject of the first file of the program. the world today, in the second case , i ask the program experts this question, why did the prime minister of iraq say about the new plan of his government to finalize the complete withdrawal of america from this country, will this issue be realized, i invite the world today until the end accompany the task of the miren paish base

was to monitor the aerial information of several countries, which was targeted by lebanon's hezbollah with 62 missiles. lebanon's hezbollah targeted the miron air surveillance control base of the zionist regime, which was located in the heights of jarmaq, the highest mountain in the north of the occupied territories, by firing 62 missiles of various types. in addition to controlling and monitoring air information in the skies of lebanon, syria, turkey and cyprus, this base is also the main military base in electronic warfare.

by targeting it, the resistance proved once again that it does not leave any crime unanswered. fortifications of mut'allah's bases. beyaz bilida and the gathering of zionist soldiers in the ramim and avivim barracks and the jalal alam and al manara bases were other targets of hezbollah's offensive operations. zionist fighter jets targeted kastri siad, kafarkala and ita shab. the zionist regime's artillery also attacked eight areas in southern lebanon, including khayyam, with prohibited phosphorus bombs . i am talking about palestinian issues and the latest developments with mr. mustafa moslehzadeh, an expert on international issues, who

is with us in studio jahan today. mr. maslehzadeh, we saw the report one day. after the speech of mr. seiden nasrallah, the base of the zionist regime is 62 times mouse. it's going to rain. i want to ask you about the importance of the base. i want to ask you how important this base is to the zionists. in the name of allah, rahman, raheem. naturally , the bases are graded. there is no doubt, especially in the north of israel, which is close to lebanon. we can divide it into the military sector only, that is, the direction of attack and the information logistics sector. at least

, of course, there are other logistics sectors, but information logistics . information logistics will be formed if israel loses this information logistics. and whether america is the main director of the battle or the israeli government is fighting as the frontline force, this information logistics is very important for them, that's why i think that hezbollah was trying from the beginning of the battle to if you are both in the news and in the movies that are intentional. hizbollah used to spread the information towers of israel regularly, that is, now is a time when hizbollah tried to hit the towers one by one . in the northern areas of israel, but the base that

has the logistics of information is much more important than a bridge, because i think that it will somehow blind and deaf your army when you take away that logistics information. i was watching the news until the last minute. according to the plan , the attacks of the lebanese hezbollah on the bases of the zionist regime continue. in your opinion, we can say that the response of the lebanese hezbollah to the zionist regime has entered a new phase, a change has taken place and this can affect the outcome of this war. strategically, i cannot mention it that is, in your opinion, the change is not a strategic change, but a tactical change. it means that if it becomes necessary now and later

in a discussion, because the same issue is raised in the case of america, the same issue is raised in the case of europe. to israel for example, suppose that it is more important to attack an intelligence logistics base from a purely military base, but not in the sense that a strategic change has occurred . what do you mean by strategic change in hezbollah's strategy? there should be a change about this conflict , explain this, the tactics, well, the method is actually possible to change, and the strategy in that big view. hizbollah is involved in this conflict. well, you see

, the strategic transformation comes back to the fact that we are facing a big fire in the region. in fact , they decided to make this a big fire . look, if the region is going to suffer from that big fire, which of course israel wants this to happen, it means, look, now, because we will expand your question a little, to this issue. americans are trying to prevent this war from leading to a big fire, as you have seen in almost more than a month, every attack by the yemenis on the israeli ships was answered by the americans. even the israeli bases

, which were in the port of eilat , were not answered. even the israelis did not answer. they only intercepted, that is, the american fleet in the red sea was intercepted. saudi arabia was intercepted . egypt was intercepted. the truth of that power is that super power. who was in charge of directing the battle to reduce the damage to israel and not want to spread the fire of the war. yes, but why did america not respond because america had many bad effects for it, if the war turned into that big fire, even the americans themselves tried not to show their presence in the war. you know that the americans regularly send weapons to israel daily

, that is, i think i was reading a report by yediot aharanot himself, that you can see, for example, regularly , tank bullets, heavy bombs, aerial drones, this is the same report of yediot aharonot, an anti-israeli report. is not. with all your might means you are a huge process every day

the transfer of weapons from america to israel is taking place during these 90 days, which i think is very rare in the history of america . mr. doctor, what do you want to conclude from this? well , now i want to say that america, whose effort was not to create that big fire, means that america's strategy was that even. it will reach its strategic strategic goals as much as possible, which i will mention now , but without that big fire, because america was not ready to do this now, if you want. i have to explain why america was not ready for this big fire in the region, and neither israel was able to respond to this big fire. at that time, because israel did not have the ability

, america had to enter the war directly. now it was no more, that is, america would have become a direct side of the war , of course the opposite sides would enter directly and this would turn into a big fire in the region and finally a big global fire. my question is that when the zionist regime started assassinating commanders resistance he did not go to that fire now, i just wanted to see if there is a difference between the american strategy and the israeli strategy in the gaza war, the lebanese part, the yemeni part, and the iraqi part, which are currently the direct actors of this

battle. zionism is being run by the americans, yes, so see. first , let's take a quick look at the strategy of america and israel. it is different from your point of view. now , i will tell you that in this quick look, it becomes clear that the strategy of america is to destroy a gaza of hamas, this is a big strategy. even in the case of the war with iran, the united states had this concern. in fact, i'm sorry to say that instead of war, the nuclear war that started in 206 continued until the end of the jcpoa with this step. the same is the case with gaza . strachani means that the first step is to destroy hamas. if hamas is not destroyed, at least hamas in gaza is managed by

hamas. if this limit is taken, it means that we have a strategy floor, a strategy ceiling, now this. it is better to use this word instead of pelekan. the goal is to manage food without hamas. the limit of this strategy is to destroy hamas completely. now if this the ceiling was not realized, this shoe must be realized, if not, this strategy will end up being bombed, and in fact, the other side of this strategy is that gaza should be reduced to a minimum number.

it is the american strategy, but they knew that the presence of the people of gaza in their country would cause changes in their country, that is , they were worried about this. not being able to reach the bottom for about 3 months means that hamas has not yet reached the bottom of compliance, which means that the problem of the american strategy is that exactly strategy. because a number of authors of articles, both in iran and abroad, point to the difference between israel and america, i want to say that this difference is not strategic, that is, israel is what it means , the destruction

of hamas is the ceiling of the strategy. exact copy. it is america's strategy and the departure of people from gaza so that gaza can be controlled, see why it says that at least one million people will leave gaza, of course, up to half a million people, america was in its program at that time, but it also had a minimum and maximum, at least one person , one million people. there is enough food in gaza control is fine, the control that i mentioned wants to be taken from hamas, who wants to give it to whom, naturally, now there are different options, for example , no, in reality, if

we consider it as stage one, that these events were supposed to happen. it happened in a short period of time, which means that the us strategy was not supposed to drag on for more than a month . america was wrong and they were deceived by thinking that north yemen or sana'a yemen would be dealt with in one week or two weeks. yemen, now i don't want to say the government of ansarullah, i want to say the government of north yemen. now , i think this is a better term than saying the ansarallah government. they thought that the work would be completed in a week or two. tehran and told that reporter that when the reporter asked saddam, don't think that, just calculate

the saddams, that means you should be sure that these are the consultations they have in the american strategy with iraq , that you will come to tehran for a week, and he told that reporter that i i will answer your question in tehran , reviewing the contemporary history of these calculation errors america has a lot. it has entered a new stage and the future of this conflict will change. with the entry of hezbollah, i mentioned the news . you mentioned the strategy of america and israel . what do you think will change in the future ? well, that's why the question here should be asked in this way , why israel entered into this process, which from your point of view is a new development, an expansion, yes, another one, that is, terror

in lebanon, terror in iran, terror in syria and attack on iraq. it means something that in the first month of america he was very careful not to answer iraq or yemen . what happened that he made such a decision because you said that he did not want a big fire, why did this happen? well, this is the point, i think the paradox of the story is here, that is, while america is not interested in that big fire, because it is not willing, i explained the reason , but israel is not able to deal with it. with that , there is a big fire, and america is forced to enter, and when america is forced to enter, the repetition of the incidents that happened in syria and in syria in 2011, in yemen in 2014, 15 in iraq in 2014, america will experience this once. well, why is he experiencing it again? well, this

is a paradox. i mean, in fact, i want to solve this paradox in these conversations. if i don't know how much i can pay at this stage, or do you want to discuss it here at one stage? summarize the first question of the first part because i have other questions that fall into other categories, so this paradox is the answer. the military of the world, the world's top economic power , has designed a plan and it has not reached it in 3 months . it was not supposed to reach a month at all, but

it has not been reached for 3 months. this is a very heavy blow for this super. a power that has no rival like him in the world compared to his power, so what should he do now, he has two ways ahead, one way is to enter that big fire he knows that he experienced it once, of course, he experienced it at the time of soleimani , but now he is not soleimani, which means that the american strategists may say that during the time of soleimani , the united nations was defeated , that is, the united nations was defeated in syria. shahid soleimani came in and scored 15 85 15 15 85. this is a very heavy defeat for the americans who are 85. the same process in iraq it happened again that martyr soleimani stood in front of them and saved the whole of iraq, iraqi kurdistan and all this from the

hands of america . why don't you become iran's opponent in this project in the process of syria, iraq and yemen? they told them that you should find someone like martyr soleimani in the region, that we will put martyr soleimani in front of you so that you can. find a person like general soleimani

let's put it in front of him. anyone who stands in front of him is defeated. see, this was a natural thing. you all know that centcom is the commander of centcom and that martyr soleimani was defeated in every battle. now, what happened after the assassination of saeed soleimani ? they considered that the fronts can reach him in less than a month, but it seems that beyond the martyrdom of soleimani, maybe a discourse is working here and is playing its role. yes, but well, we should look from the american perspective, not from the eyes from the point of view of the american strategy, we have to look at the fact that he feels that the resistance front had a great general who was unparalleled in the entire region .

american, by the way, why did they design this strategy ? look carefully. if we don't say these preliminary points, i said that's why i might not have a chance . this has a preliminary point . first of all, even i would like to leave aside some other questions. we have a lot of plans, we have questions from you, but my question now is what you think you actually have. you analyze the operation room of the us and the zionist regime when the issue of isis tools was in the hands of the us and they were behind isis, and you compare that the commander of sankt kam was against sardar soleimani now that sardar soleimani was assassinated by the americans . yes, but they still can't make their own plans in the region. in your opinion , how is the mood of that operation room now? it's exactly the same

paradox as me. i said it's right here, it means they have arranged some items together, which he said see, you review the war of gaza again. 2008 is the first war of gaza, 2012 is the second war of gaza, 2014 is the third war of gaza, the day of hashem is getting shorter. eat means pay attention, what's up now? now in 2023, first of all, there is no shahis soleimani , this is a second item, america has decided to do what it could not do during the time of martyr soleimani, with the most difficult and catastrophic and in fact the most extensive massacre in gaza

. about gaza in all that war in 2008, 2012, 2014, 2019, it absolutely did not do this, that is, this massive massacre in gaza and that you cut off water to the people, that means you hit all the water centers, you hit the bakeries , you hit the hospitals, you hit the food entry completely for a while. israel was cut and closed after a while when it suffered an international bombardment, it opened up . for a long time, the people of gaza used the same small reserve that was in gaza , whether it was water, bread, or medicine. we do not know that the result will be even better.