in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, hello, i am alireza hashem zadegan with jahan, i am with you today . in the first case of tonight's program , we will examine south africa's complaint against the zionist regime to the international court of justice regarding the genocide in gaza. we want war, including the early morning attack of the united states and england on places in yemen. payment but first, let's take a look at

the latest images of public gatherings around the world . will live forever say it loud and say it clear say it loud and say it clear liberation is near liberation is near liberation revolutions.

palestine and al-tabbeer, listen, listen, or amir yali, with the case, the whole country , the whole country, the whole country, the whole country, the whole country, the whole country, the whole country, the whole jordan, the whole jordan, the zionist, burning me, and me, and the zionist, the great burning for the leader of the victory of al-madinah and its branches and the martyrs , the zionist, ansar allah, do not wave

, ansar of god, do not wave, or yemeni, god is great, drown them in the sea . al-ahmar kharjham bal al-ahmar in palestine tathih to israel israel or asram islam , we will start the first case of tonight's program. a

day after hearing south africa's request for urgent action by the international court of justice for the immediate stop of the military actions of the zionist regime in gaza , the hearing of the positions of the zionist regime was also held at the court in the hague. in dozens of pages of files, citing the words of zionist leaders and documents related to the targeted killing of civilians in gaza, south africa has filed a complaint against the genocide of the zionist regime to the court, a historical court, the location of the peace palace in laha, the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice for handling south africa's complaint against the occupying regime accused of genocide in gaza. but the importance of the issue that makes supporters of palestine to speak like this. south african lawyer

react the zionist regime, which always saw itself above the international law, is now in alit. the world court is sitting in the place of the accused. that is the accusation of the biggest crime against humanity. genocide . 75 years after he declared himself a victim of genocide. if it is confirmed from this international authority to this world court that the zionist regime has committed genocide , it will play a unique role in discrediting and delegitimizing the actions of the zionist regime. the person who until today has presented himself to the public opinion of the world as a shelter for the victims of genocide, if he is accused today and if he is convicted of committing genocide, then, naturally, these words and propaganda that he started will break and will be out of his hands. yesterday, the lawyers of south africa

presented their documents line by line before the 17 judges of the court , from the role of the regime leaders in encouraging the genocide . considering that the composition of the judges of the international court of justice will change on february 6, that is, in about 3 weeks. the court is forced to issue its verdict on the need or not to stop the war in gaza until then

. a ruling on the entire genocide lawsuit, however, may take years. mohammad kazemi radio news agency. now, to further investigate this complaint , we are hosting mr. mohammad hadi zakir hossein, a faculty member and law professor at the university of tehran . he filed a lawsuit and was able to take the zionist regime to court. in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful. to his excellency and all dear viewers . greetings and good night. i am taking action. the south african government filed a complaint against the israeli regime at the international court of justice in the dutch part of the project there is a legal war against the israeli regime, which the global criminal justice system

has provided for all justice-seekers in the world and all governments that have justice-seeking diplomacy. parallel to every military war, a legal war is formed, the purpose of which is to make maximum use of recognition mechanisms. well known . in the international system, with the aim of putting an end to this, the perpetrators of the most serious international crimes are ordered, that is, the kachi generation, war crimes , crimes against humanity, and it also means that anyone who commits this without real punishment must be held accountable for his behavior. it is looking for an era and the era is over. if a crime happens, the person should be subject to international justice. this is the first and second goal. to support the victims of these crimes is to give a voice to the silent victims, to achieve justice for them, to compensate the damages caused to these victims of international crimes, and the third goal, which is perhaps the most important goal, is to record the truth in the journal of history, a legal war is a activism in war

is also a narrative. in every international crime, the criminal tries to distort and deny the crime. the activists and those who want international justice try to actually stop this fake narrative. in these days of the gaza war , we are fully witnessing the fact that the zionist regime is justifying its crimes by referring to the legitimate defense of the war against terrorists, and the action is actually south africa . in this legal war , it can actually face all these arguments of the zionist regime with a serious challenge and stop its narration. what document was there in international law that south africa was able to proceed based on and take the matter to the court? in this legal war in which south africa acted with his own initiative has been active in two fronts , one is in the international criminal court, which is an international organization, today 124 states are members of it, its jurisdiction is limited

, it does not deal with the individual criminal responsibility of people there , the palestinian government is a member of that court. since 2015 , he has been a member of the prosecution court. recent cases are also subject to the jurisdiction of the court. any international crime that occurs in the palestinian territory, even if it is committed by israelis who recognize the court. they know that it is subject to the jurisdiction of the court from this recent action, south africa actually submitted the case of palestine to the international criminal court's prosecutor's office, which was not the court it had today , which had a symbolic aspect to support the court's prosecutor's investigation and clarify that it took time, that is, a there is an international criminal court (icc) based on the rome statute. i think the countries that are members should join it. if such crimes happen in their own country , any person who committed them

can be there, regardless of whether he is one of the heads of the countries or a commoner. let's start a lawsuit, this is a field now, the reason why south africa was able to file a lawsuit in the international court of justice in the hague is this recent lawsuit in the international court of justice, which is a judicial pillar of the united nations and whose jurisdiction is limited to lawsuits between governments that accept its jurisdiction. it was menut. in fact, it is relevant to the genocide convention, which both south africa and the israeli regime are members of . what does the international court of justice know about the genocide convention itself, in the event of a dispute in the implementation or interpretation of the provisions of the convention, the dispute resolution authority of the member states? that year the convention was signed. the convention of 190 is actually 48 and one day before the universal declaration of human rights was even approved by the united nations. the countries that signed this convention , if there is a genocide somewhere in the world

and there is a difference of opinion between the governments, they can go to the international court of justice based on the text of the convention and make it a ruling . there is a fact , even if that killing and those violations did not happen in their territory, the procedure of the international court of justice itself in similar cases in relation to nasdachi , like myanmar's nasdachi, like nasdachi, in fact, in besni, the head-brainists of besni have announced that in fact all governments are zainaf, and if this convention is violated, any government can actually file a lawsuit as a victim and zainaf. he cannot tell south africa or any government what it has to do with you . you were not in this land, no, no, this is not a problem, as when the gambia and the gambian government are against myanmar because of the occurrence of the kachhi generation in the land of myanmar. the dispute was filed in the same court, and this jurisdictional objection was rejected. what request has south africa put forward

in this doubt? see, the convention on non-proliferation stipulates a series of obligations for the member states, a series of behaviors they must perform and a series of behaviors they must not perform. both positive and negative obligations. the south african government has claimed that the israeli regime has broken all these obligations, that is, it should not do a series of things , it should not commit genocide. nasaksheh means the destruction of an ethnic or national, racial and religious group, all or part of the members of that group , he claims that he actually committed this genocide. you should not incite genocide, which is an independent crime, genocide is a cultural crime and has a grounding process, and this incitement to the kachhi generation and actually spreading hatred against the victims is also prohibited . israel claims, in fact, south africa claims that israel is wrong he has to do a series of positive commitments. it should have prosecuted the perpetrators of the massacre, which south africa has declared, it has not done this, and by

leaving the elephant, it has actually given its own forces a green light, and on the other hand, it should have prevented the occurrence of massacre, which did this. as you mentioned in your program , it may take years to deal with this case, but south africa came and based on the procedural capacity of the international court of justice, it requested the issuance of a temporary order, which is where it actually is. a benefit and a right that may be destroyed due to the violation of those obligations and may be irreparably damaged, that government can actually request the court to issue a temporary order as an emergency for the time being. where will this case lead and the zionist regime it cannot be proven in this court in the current situation because of the humanitarian situation in africa. south, that the court should now order that the zionist regime stop this war

, yes, suspend its military operations, and preserve the positive documents and evidence, and not destroy them . in fact , we also had russian military action and russian aggression, when the same court filed a lawsuit, the court issued a temporary order , and that is what forced russia to suspend its military operations for the time being. yes well, this trial started yesterday, i would like to ask what south africa said , and then the zionist regime wants to join. let's start with the evidence presented by south africa in the court. well , yesterday and today, the hearing of this request for the issuance of a temporary order began with the hearing of south africa's defenses and evidence. it is a very well-reasoned letter and detailed documentation. it is based on what it was

based on. it is based on the data and findings of the united nations, that is, the special rapporteurs of the united nations, investigative commissions. united nations. the secretary general of the united nations, in this sense, these references are very good , and the evidence he presented in yesterday's meeting was divided into two categories. genocide is happening . the members of this group of palestinian people in the north of gaza refused that more than 23,000 people are actually killed , most of them are children, according to the interpretation of the un secretary general, it has become a cemetery and children's cemetery in the north of nawaraq, gaza . a journalist, two doctors , every day, an employee, in fact, the united nations itself

, is actually killed in gaza, so the killing of a researcher is the second behavior that he mentioned. actually, the destruction of the palestinian nation is through a gradual death, which means imposing conditions of life that are designed to make them suffer a gradual death by depriving them of access to the crown of the life of starvation is the forced transfer of them from the north of gaza to other areas where there are no possibilities for them to continue living, and the third behavior that was documented and a constructive behavior of neskchi is in the convention itself , it is preventing birth. the members of that group announced that by making the north food, by destroying the medical and treatment facilities, the possibility of having children is safe, if it is not available for the mothers of gaza, one part will go back to the killing of people who are now children or adults, another part will prevent the formation of a new generation for exactly that genocide. it is physical that you

are committing an immediate or gradual killing and this is a biological genocide that we are actually preventing the birth of a generation . the hate speech and genocidal literature were very obvious . for example, the war minister of the galat regime said in the first days that we are facing a series of humans, animals, and humanoid animals in gaza. we will cut off the water, cut off the electricity, and cut off the food. we will not let him enter gaza. this is another document in one there is no need for him to come in front of the cameras in front of jin's eyes. this is the reason why one of the lawyers announced that one of the exceptional features of this case is that these statements of nazal keshane in public ian kamar are actually coincidental and cannot be interpreted exactly. that is, sometimes you make a statement that , well, you can say that these are political statements in the capacity

of execution and not orders, but the lawyers claim that in fact these genocidal statements should be understood and interpreted by you. on the battlefield , see how they interpreted this from the soldiers of the israeli army , with the documents they actually presented. including the video that you are actually showing, where the soldiers are dancing and rejoicing and repeating the same statements of their officials, it proved that these statements were a green light for committing crimes and genocide by african soldiers. south then with a hand full of documents that documented the statements. he was the secretary general of the united nations and also the facts on the ground and the positions of the zionists in the court yesterday. today, i think the zionists have a chance to defend themselves and say that we did not kill them. what is israel saying right now? in fact, he took the case very seriously and went into it with all his strength

. knowledge for the sake of knowledge and expertise without commitment is not beneficial and may be harmful . that is why you may read and teach the law of nazism and the law of international justice, but where there is a field of action, you will also become the devil's advocate in israel . in any case, the person who he is one of the authors of international criminal law books in the world, many students may even have done it in gloves as a result of the whitewashing of this crime , israel also gained jurisdiction over a series of irans. in fact, according to the procedure of the international court of justice, before filing a lawsuit in the court

, there must be a preliminary dispute and a dispute between the two governments. bilateral mechanisms did not answer, he objected that these were not actually friendly, a form of objection that was not very strong in the light of the court's past, but two very important points . condemning hamas means that he was actually speaking off-topic instead of talking about the behavior of hamas he defends himself by constantly trying to condemn hamas and perhaps what we call projection, exactly more than 80 times . he said that these things that i am doing were in the capacity of legitimate defense, while this is not acceptable either, first of all, the occupying government. he does not have the right to legitimate defense against the resistance against the occupation. on the other hand , legitimate defense in the international law system

is defense against a government, anyway, the zionist regime itself is hamas. it does not recognize as a government that it can resort to this idea. i think that the defense must be proportionate . this is exactly another argument against the zionist regime. even if we accept it, it has the right to invoke legitimate defense . this defense has one condition. it should be proportionate. in the name of defense, you can't commit a crime. in fact , it's a form of defense. when it crosses its limits , you've committed a crime and you can't justify it. one of them is mr. malkam shaf, this prominent law professor the international, which is in charge of representing the zionists , the satan's lawyer was very anxious during his own defense. he lost the mullah, his voice would actually stop, he would stutter , and this showed that when you don't believe in what you are saying , you will experience anxiety and stress, and

my final questions are what will happen next. these two hearings were held yesterday and today , then what can you see now that we have to wait for the court to issue the temporary order? the temporary order is usually issued early compared to the long process of several years. this order will be issued in a month to two months or more. there are different scenarios, that is , the story will stop from today . we have no news about the story until one day it is announced that it will be read . one session for the plaintiff and one session for the person who actually defended himself . how many scenarios are there? south africa should vote, respond to south africa's request and declare that the zionist regime

is actually accused of committing genocide. if this happens , it will be a historic vote . cotton means that the court should agree to deal with this case and issue a temporary order in the future and declare that the zionist regime should stop all its military operations because it is actually committing a crime in the future so that i can find mahovi's arrival in the future. well, naturally, this front is a legal battle it will also help against israel. later on , the supporters of the zionist regime, as someone who committed a crime, can be opened to the legal bodies. there is an expectation that one of the lawyers actually declared in his defense that this is the first genocide the victims have crimes that are committed against them, and they publish these injuries in cyberspace and the media , they are exposed to the audience of the international community, because they expect that they will show a supportive reaction, but on

the other hand, it is possible that the court completely vote for the photo of this story. defense is actually africa if it does not accept the south and votes in favor of israel , it can be said that in fact the court will break the back of international law and the effectiveness of its legitimacy under the year means everything that has been written in the law books in these years. international criminal law, international criminal law was practically destroyed in front of the eyes of all law students and law professors, precisely from the beginning of the gaza war, when all kinds of international crimes were happening non-stop. this is a question for lawyers and lawyers . it was formed that the effectiveness of this system is something that cannot be prevented by initiative south africa gave an opportunity to revive international law, and if the court does not use this opportunity now, this phenomenon will end.

a very short question, in your opinion , how do you see progress in the defense of south africa and the zionist regime in general, as i mentioned, in my opinion, the defense of south africa was much more thorough, that is, what. which south africa raised, especially since it was documented and the data of various organs of the united nations, people affiliated with the united nations, such as the special rapporteurs of the united nations, the point of attention is that these reporters especially after the meeting on the first day, some of them and some of the un experts gave a joint statement and actually defended the process of this trial and what south africa had cited. one of the defenses that israel

had actually put forward was that he said that the israeli army itself has a series of legal advisers who monitor and make sure that human rights are not violated . one of the un special rapporteurs quickly tweeted and announced that the same advisers they should also be held accountable for their behavior because it is clear that in reality the failure to act and not to take care of all the crimes that have happened show that the atmosphere of international law is currently more in favor of actually handling the case. and the atmosphere of your court is right, you say that it is generally positive, banff south africa is generally positive, but as you pointed out , unfortunately, the international environment, even the legal environment , is focused on power and politics and influenced by them , let's see what happens and the final question that maybe many people in iran have this question , they should ask themselves now, it is not clear how much it will be mentioned in the media, why south africa, why for example iran did not go to file a lawsuit, we could not file

a complaint. let's look at this court, we started the program with a happy news , the initiative of south africa, the historical action of south africa, but we have to end it with a story like your question , as we mentioned, why are we absent? south africa entered because it had an international commitment, like all other governments, including the government of iran, the international justice system requires all governments to support the victims and deal with international crimes. do it in the doctrine of the responsibility of supporting it in fact, it can be interpreted that responsibility protect is a comprehensive general commitment that governments should deal with these international crimes, which are a violation of the rules of international law, including legal confrontation, and the sterilization of iran had the same international obligation, but more and earlier than he also had internal obligations. iran is a country that , since the establishment and establishment

of the islamic republic of iran, the issue of supporting the world's employees has been discussed in its constitution, but he said, "you promised, and he fulfilled it. we discussed the issue of supporting the world's employees." before 2005, when the idea of ​​liability protection was proposed we had it in our legal system, but unfortunately, in these 40 years, we never had legal activism as we should have, maybe in the position of supporting the world's employees, including the palestinian issue, our rights diplomacy has not been active . recognition of israel . first of all, it is not the case that filing a lawsuit does not necessarily mean the political acceptance of a regime and a government, but even if the iranian government did not want to actually file a lawsuit against israel itself due to these considerations, based on this possibility of genocide, it had the opportunity to to step forward take the initiative to file a lawsuit against the allies and other member states of the convention, in fact, the genocide convention, because they

also failed to act in preventing the actual occurrence of genocide, that is, you say that we had a series of duties in the constitution and laws it has been mentioned several times that different parts of the system and the government are legally obliged to follow up on the inter-adventure scene, but not following up on the responsibility was not carried out. there is also a justification for it, which is that if we went, we would have complained, which means we would have recognized israel. you say that you must file a complaint the meaning of recognition. for example, it is not israel , but even leaving this justification aside, we had the possibility to file a lawsuit against the other government officials of this regime who provided the bombs and they also have new documents against them, but we didn't, or the same court. once in 2004, the international court of justice was questioned in the united nations general assembly and proposed a consultative theory on the construction of a barrier wall. there , he called on the governments to come up with their own ideas.