send a text message to the thousand 79 78 system and it will replace the warranty within 7 days. what else do we want? 2 o'clock: people of some countries came to the streets in support of palestine. in a demonstration in amban, the capital of this country, the jordanians condemned the zionists' attacks on gaza. in the united states, the supporters of palestine condemned the aggression of the united states and the united kingdom to yemen , and the cry of the united states and the united kingdom, go to hell.

the palestinians also demonstrated in ramallah in support of the yemeni people and condemned the attacks on yemen by holding the picture of the leader of ansarullah in yemen . the bahrainis also supported gaza and condemned the aggression. in yemen, they came to the streets in south africa , dazman foundation. tutu announced the lineage of the statue of the famous archbishop of south africa and the leaders of the anti-apartheid movement in this country with a palestinian chap on the porch of this foundation's building in cape town . award nominees were announced in all sections of the 9th computer games festival.

fajr computer games were announced in 216 asr. in fact, 112 game makers sent this work to the secretariat, of which 53 were individuals, 24 were teams, and 35 companies actually sent 125 game works. being mobile and 91 effects of pc games.

10 billion investment on selected fajar computer games. there are about 10 investors or 10 investment funds, together with the foundation, in fact, these teams. we will be there, god willing, in the platforms that have a foundation, this investment will be managed so that the products will come to fruition and actually bring themselves to continue until the next investment event. popular voting of the best games of the 9th fajr computer games festival. in this period of the festival , we actually brought public voting to the site of the festival itself, which is actually game makers to. in a clear and instant way, the number

of people's votes for their game can be seen on the festival website at the same moment. well, this also adds to the attractiveness of the work , and it can actually add to the transparency of the work , and the accuracy of the registration actually increases. the closing ceremony the 9th vajr computer games festival 23 will be held in vahdat hall. ahmad aminfard, sed and sima news agency. until the next part.

in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, i greet alireza hashemzadegan with the world. today i am with you in the first case of tonight's program, south africa's complaint against the zionist regime to the international court of justice we will examine the genocide in gaza. in the second case

, we will discuss the latest developments on the 98th day of the war, including the early morning attack of the united states and england on places in yemen . stop bombing yemen now, stop bombing yemen now, yemen will live forever, say it loud and say it clear, say it loud and say it clear, liberation is near, liberation is near, revolution, revolutions.

ansar allah, don't be afraid. ansar allah, don't be afraid . yamani, god is great. they are drowning in the red sea. in the red sea for palestine, the voice of israel , god, israeli or modern, or yemen, resistance with resistance, or

the first case of tonight's program, we will start one day after hearing south africa's request for immediate action by the international court the hearing of the positions of the zionist regime was held at the courthouse in hague for the immediate halt of the zionist regime's military actions in gaza. south africa complained to the court about the genocide of the zionist regime in dozens of pages of documents citing the words of the zionist leaders and the documents related to the targeted killing of civilians in gaza. historical court. palace location peace in laha is the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice to deal with south africa's complaint against the occupying regime for genocide in gaza. but

the importance of the issue that makes the supporters of palestine react in this way to the words of the south african lawyer . the zionist regime, which always saw itself above international law, is now sitting in the highest court of the world as the accused , accused of the biggest crime against humanity. sharia genocide 75 years after he identified himself as a victim of genocide. if it is confirmed by this international authority and this world court that the zionist regime has committed murder, it is valid the delegitimization of the actions of the zionist regime will play a unique role. the person who has presented himself to the public opinion of the world as a shelter for the victims of genocide, if he is accused and convicted of committing genocide, then naturally

he will break the words and propaganda that he started and get out of his hands. yesterday, south african lawyers presented their documents line by line before the 17 judges of the court. from the role of the regime leaders in encouraging genocide to the cases of mass killings and the happiness of the killers. in the second session of today's proceedings of the representatives tel aviv defended the actions of the zionist regime. the defense, which according to experts did not respond to the accusations , was definitely not as convincing as south africa's presentation yesterday . it was a generalization rather than the presentation of documents . it was not strong from a legal point of view. international dadag. on february 6th, that means it will change in about 3 weeks. the court

is forced to issue its decision on the need or not to stop the war in gaza by that time. a ruling on the entire genocide lawsuit, however, may take years. mohammad kazemi, sed and broadcasting news agency. now to further investigate this complaint, the host is mr. mohammad hadi zakir hossein, a faculty member and professor. we are tehran university of law, mr. zakir hossein , welcome. first of all, we would like to tell you what was the background in international law that south africa brought such a lawsuit based on it and was able to take the zionist regime to court . your excellency and all dear viewers, hello and good night. the action of the south african government in filing a complaint against the israeli regime in the international court of justice in the netherlands. part of the legal war project against the regime it is israel that

provides the global criminal justice system for all justice-seekers in the world and all governments that have justice-seeking diplomacy . parallel to every military war, a legal war is formed, the purpose of which is to make maximum use of the recognized mechanisms in the international system is aimed at putting an end to the brutality of the perpetrators of the most serious international crimes. it means genocide, war crime, crime against humanity. it means that whoever commits this, do not go unpunished. he must be responsible for his own behavior. the world community is looking for that the era of knocking and knocking is over. if a crime happens, the person should be subject to international justice. this is the first. the second goal of supporting the victims of these crimes is to give a voice to the silent victims, to achieve justice for them, to compensate for the damages. in fact , it is an international crime for these victims, and the third goal, which is perhaps the most important goal, is to record the truth in

the history of the legal war, an activist in a narrative war , in every international crime, the criminal tries to distort and deny the crime. activists and international justice seekers are trying to actually stop this fake narrative. in these days of the gaza war , we are fully witnessing the fact that the three regimes are justifying their crimes by referring to the legitimate defense of the war against terrorists, and the action of south africa in fact. this legal battle can actually seriously challenge all these arguments of the zionist regime and stop it from being narrated . what document was there in international law that south africa was able to proceed based on and take the matter to the court? this legal war in which south africa acted with initiative he has done his activism on two fronts, one is in the international criminal court, which is an

international organization. today, 124 states are members of it . its jurisdiction is limited to the individual criminal responsibility of the people there. it does not deal with the states. the palestinian government is a member of that court it became a member of the court in 2015. the prosecutor 's office of the court has started its investigation since 2018. recent cases are also subject to the court's jurisdiction. it is subject to the jurisdiction of the court before this recent action of south africa, in fact , the case of palestine was referred to the prosecution of the international criminal court , not the court that it had today, which had a symbolic aspect to support the investigation of the court's prosecution and clarify that it took time, that is, the aspect that an icj is between there is an international criminal law. according to the rome statute, i think the countries that are members join it. if

such crimes happen in their own land, any person who committed them, regardless of whether they are among the heads of the country. now the field that south africa was able to find in the international court of justice in the hague he should file a lawsuit, what happened? this recent lawsuit is in the international court of justice, which is the judicial pillar of the united nations and whose jurisdiction is limited to lawsuits between governments that accept its jurisdiction. south and indeed. one day before even the adoption of the universal declaration of human rights, this convention was approved by the united nations, that is

, the countries that signed this convention, if anywhere in the world. if a conflict occurs and there is a difference of opinion between the governments, they can refer to the international court of justice based on the text of the convention itself do it and make it a sentence , exactly this authority exists for all member states , even if the killing and those violations did not happen in their territory, the procedure of the international court of justice in similar cases related to killing like naskshi of myanmar, like naskshi actually announced this in besni sabrinaists . that in fact, all governments are zainaf and if this convention is violated, any government can actually file a lawsuit as a victim and zainaf , here no one can tell south africa or any government what it has to do with you. we were not in this land, we are not, no, this objection does not apply, because when the country of gambia and the government of gambia filed a lawsuit against myanmar due to the occurrence of the kechi generation in the land of myanmar

, this jurisdictional objection was declared rejected, now obviously south africa. what request did he make in this complaint? see, the genocide convention stipulates a series of obligations for the member states , a series of behaviors they must perform and a series of behaviors they must not perform, both positive and negative obligations. the south african government has claimed that the israeli regime has violated all these obligations it means that a series of things should not have been done . massacre should not have been committed. massacre means the destruction of an ethnic or national, racial and religious group, all or part of the members of that group. it is a cultural crime and there is a grounding process, and this incitement to the kachhi generation and actually spreading hatred against the victims is also prohibited. israel claims, in fact , south africa claims that israel has done this wrong.

it is prosecuting the perpetrators of the massacre, which south africa has declared that it has not done, with this departure of the black elephant. show in fact, he gave it to his own forces, and on the other hand , he should have prevented the occurrence of a conflict, which he did not do. dealing with this dispute from six matters, as you mentioned in your program , may take years, but south africa came and based on the capacity of the mirror of the international court of justice's proceedings requested the issuance of a temporary order , that is, where it is actually a benefit and a right that may be irreparably destroyed due to the violation of those obligations. it can be proven in this court, in the current situation , because of the humanitarian situation, south africa requested

that the court now rule that this is the zionist regime stop the war, yes, his military operations, in fact. do it and preserve the positive documents and evidence , don't destroy them . we also had a similar decision in the case of ukraine against russia, after the russian military action and russian aggression . this is what forced russia to stop and suspend its military operations for the time being. yes , this trial started yesterday. i want to continue. what did south africa say? next , the zionist regime wants to start with the case that south africa raised in court. well, yesterday and today, processing the same request to issue an order. it was temporary, it started with the hearing, in fact , south africa's defenses and evidence, south africa has entered this story strongly. the complaint that

he sent is also a very well-reasoned and detailed complaint. the united nations means the special rapporteurs of the united nations, the commissions of inquiry of the united nations, the secretary general of the united nations, in this sense, these references are very good, and the evidences that he presented in yesterday's meeting were actually divided into two categories, one is evidence. actually do you know what is happening on the floor of the square in gaza? genocide. it means the physical destruction and killing of the members of this group of palestinian people in the north of gaza, insisting that more than 23,000 people were actually killed, most of them children. being , according to the interpretation of the secretary general of the united nations, has become the cemetery and children's cemetery in the north of nagarq, gaza . 270 people are being killed, 48 mothers, one journalist

, two doctors, one employee every day, every day , in fact, the united nations itself is being killed in gaza , so the killing is real . it means imposing conditions of life designed so that they suffer a gradual death by depriving them of access to the crown of life, giving them forced transfer from the north of gaza to other areas where there are no facilities for them to continue living, and the third behavior which he documented and there is a constructive behavior of nesbakchi in the convention itself among the members of that group, he announced that by making the north of gaza insecure, by destroying medical and medical facilities , it is possible to have a safe child. there is another part

of preventing the formation of a new generation. they say that genocide is physical genocide that you commit by killing or gradually, and this is biological genocide that actually prevents the birth of a new generation. the other evidence that he brought was verbal evidence. and documented the statements and speeches of senior military and political officials the three-set regime was very clear about the hate speech and genocidal literature. for example , the war minister of the galat regime said in the first days that we are facing a series of human beings, animals, and humanoid animals. we cut off the food, we don't let him enter the food , he doesn't need a document in one place, he came in front of the cameras in front of the people , the reason is that one of the lawyers announced that one of the exceptional features of this case is that these genocidal statements are made publicly. and the frequent manifestation is actually stated precisely and cannot be interpreted

that is, sometimes you make a statement that, well , you can say that these are political statements in the capacity of execution and not orders, but the lawyers claim that in fact these statements are derogatory . how did they interpret this? well, with the documents that they actually presented, including the film that you actually showed , where the soldiers are dancing and rejoicing, and they are repeating the same statements of the installation of their officials , it proved that it is clear. from these statements, ceragh sabzi was the light for committing the crime of murder so the south african soldiers have their hands full of documents that document the statements of reporters and the secretary general of the united nations, as well as the facts on the ground and the positions of the zionists in the court yesterday . he said, "today, i think the zionists have a chance to defend themselves, to say that we did not commit genocide

. what do they say? israel has actually taken the case very seriously and entered with all its forces. hai was recognized and the main international law was actually the main lawyer in this case parenthetically, i should say here that they say that knowledge for the sake of knowledge and expertise without commitment has no oil. it is harmful that you may read and teach the law of genocide and the law of international justice, but where there is a field of action, you become the devil's advocate for israel . in any case, in fact, he is the person who himself is one of the authors of the international criminal law books in the world. many students may even in our country read that book tomorrow, when such a genocide occurs , killing twenty thousand people in these 3 months, now he will go and become the defender of the army that has done something to whitewash this crime. for israel's side, in fact, the jurisdiction

that it took, according to the procedure of the international court of justice itself, before filing a lawsuit in the court , a series of preliminary steps must be taken . there must be a dispute and a dispute between the two governments. nedd objected that these were not actually affection, a form of objection that was not very strong in the light of the court's previous procedure, but two very important points . he always tries to defend his behavior it was condemning hamas, and perhaps what we call projection, exactly more than 80 times, perhaps he actually repeated the title of hamas, which also attracted the attention and subject of some international activists , but the main defense that he mentioned said these things that i am doing are in the capacity of legitimate defense, while this is also not acceptable

. conditional in the international law system is defense against a government, anyway , the zionist regime itself considers hamas as a government i don't recognize that he can resort to this idea . i think that the defense must be proportionate . another argument against the zionist regime is exactly that, even if we accept that it has the right to invoke legitimate defense. this defense has one condition, it must be proportionate. it cannot be defended, in fact, you commit genocide to some extent, it is a defense to some extent, when it crosses its limits, you have committed a crime and you cannot justify it with this title . it had a series of margins that were sometimes more important than one of them was mr. malkam shaf, this prominent professor of international law the international lawyer who is in charge of representing the zionists, the devil's advocate , was very anxious during his actual defense, he was disoriented several times, he actually lost the defense papers he was reading from them, his voice actually stopped and cracked. and this showed

that when you don't believe what he is saying , you will experience anxiety and stress, and my final questions are what will happen next. these two asthma meetings were held yesterday and today. what can be seen next , now that we have to wait for the court to vote for itself to issue the temporary order, the temporary order is usually issued early, compared to the long process of several years, maybe between a month and two months less or more, this order will be issued . there are different scenarios, that is, the story follows from today. it can be argued that we have no news about the incident until one day it is announced that it is going to be held. in fact, the hearings and in-person hearings were just one meeting, one meeting for the actual plaintiff and one meeting for the person who actually defended himself. there are several scenarios. yes, yes, there are several scenarios, the most likely one is to vote in favor of south africa make south africa answer and announce that the zionist regime is actually accused of

committing genocide. there is, if this happens, it will be a historic vote. whatever the zionist regime has in fact accepted, the court, that is , to hear this case, issue a temporary order in the future and declare that the sahin regime is not right because if he is actually committing genocide, he should stop all his military operations so that i can find the substance of this vote in the future. will help. later, the supporters of the zionist regime can be opened to the legal bodies as someone who is committing a crime. there is this expectation. one of the speakers actually announced in his defense that this is the first genocide where the victims have crimes committed against them and publish these injuries in cyberspace and media in front of the world community. they know why because they expect them to show a supportive reaction, but on the other hand.

it is possible that the court will vote the opposite of this case, in fact, the defense of south africa refuse to vote in favor of israel, if it is also possible , it can be said that in fact the court will break the back of international law, and the efficiency of its legitimacy will be under the year that has been written in the books of international criminal law, international criminal law , practically in front of the eyes of all law students and law professors were fixed on the ground, exactly from the beginning of the war. gaza, where all kinds of international crimes were happening non-stop, this was a question for lawyers and lawyers , what is the efficiency of this system that cannot prevent it. south africa's initiative gave a chance to restore international law, and if the court does not use this opportunity now , i think that the un is not the security council, but the political nature of this phenomenon.