goodbye. in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the world. today i will be with you, alireza hashemzadegan. in the first episode of tonight's program , we will review the developments of the war against gaza on its 104th day. the international media has also published an important comment from the public opinion of the arab world regarding their view of the palestinian issue. and finally

we will examine the latest developments in iran-pakistan relations, but first let's see palestine in the narrative of the picture.

under yalla yalla, breath, breath, breath, breath, breath, breath ghusl of a face, ghusl of a face, ghusl of a face, or with the right to our child, who is targeting this child's sin.

hasbi allah and naim al-wakil, o people of arabia, or jama'a, yaba allah, you are free from allah . peace be upon you, may allah's mercy and blessings be upon you. peace

be upon you and may god's mercy be upon you, ya jama'a rajijoon, or hajjah, we are with you, we are with you , and we are with you. may god be with you. it connects to my heart

. it connects with my heart. we are with you. 30 zionist soldiers were ambushed by palestinian resistance forces. the incident was such that the palestinian fighters of these soldiers faced a bombed house in the east of khan younis in the south of the gaza strip. dragging and killing or injuring all of them by destroying the house. hamas announced that it targeted the merkava tank and a military bulldozer of the zionist occupation in the east of khan younis with the yasin 105 anti-armor rocket . images of resistance fighters clashing with enemy soldiers and armored vehicles in gaza city have been published in the name of god almighty

. besides these, the army of the occupying regime has also reported the wounding of 28 soldiers of this regime in the battles of gaza in the past 24 hours. it has been announced that the wounded zionist soldiers have reached 2,630 people since the beginning of al-akhsa storm. secretary general of yemen's ansarullah movement said that aggression against yemen destroys our position support for the palestinian people will not change. seyyed abdul malik badreddin emphasized that we will continue targeting zionist ships in the red sea. america too. he knew about the crimes of the zionist regime and criticized some islamic countries for their lack of attention on the palestinian issue. according to seyyed abdul malik badruddin, some countries that introduce themselves as actors in the palestinian issue

are only spectators to the developments in gaza, and now in the first case. tonight's program is hosted by mr. mohammad saleh sedekian, an expert on west asian issues, reviewing the developments of the 104th day mr. sedekian , how has the situation progressed after this period? what are the conditions of the two sides now, both the palestinians and the zionists, in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings to you and dear viewers. i think that now we should talk about the first 100 days that have lasted until now it's past now. between these criminals and the war that the zionists are waging against the people of gaza, the innocent people of gaza, the children and women of palestine , that is, those who are not fighters and are

civilians, there are two very strategic issues for our zionist army. in these first 100 days of the zionist regime to its own zionist army he claimed that in these 75 years, he claimed that an army was introducing an army of utter failure both in the region and in the world, and he himself said in the wars of 1967 and 1973 and other wars. it is invincible, now this is the strategy of the zionist regime army , now this issue is a defeatable army, and now we have seen that less than a thousand children of

the palestinian resistance were able to break through the strong wall of the zionist regime and enter, and one of the children said that when we left . we wanted to go forward, only about 50 or 40 kilometers, we went to 300 kilometers, and we were afraid that we would stay there, so we returned. otherwise, we could have gone inside, that is, we would have reached the big cities of the palestinian land and this defeatable palestinian army, the army of the zionist regime, this is a very important issue for the regime. that is, the situation of this failure has not changed from the beginning until now, and this one is still the zionist regime losing the war. now i am

asking you, how is your service the loser of the war? diet with ethics. the most powerful army in the world, and he himself says, "we don't know , rank 11, rank 10, rank 8, this is renewed every year." and he said this year. with these children, not only we saw it, not only we heard it, the whole world heard it and saw it, even the head of the secretary general of the international organization said that palestine has become the grave of children in the world , he said this himself, and finally he. the description of the most moral army is not an issue anymore

. the next issue in these 100 days, if we want , we will examine the three strategic and fundamental goals that the zionist regime has set for its entry into gaza, one of which is the destruction of the hamas movement. that didn't happen. the second is the destruction of qasam, which did not happen either. third, finding those zionists who are in hamas and this too it didn't happen. these three basic strategic goals, when the zionist army entered gaza, it said that it has these three goals, and after 100 days, which we have now for 14 days, the zionist regime could not investigate these three main goals, and i see that they have not been fulfilled. these

three goals are a second defeat after the 7th of october, this is a second defeat for this regime and for the army of the zionist regime and for the two governments or war governments that mr. the result of the formation of this war government is a disgraceful failure for this government . did you mention the goals that they took at the beginning of the war, openly announcing the destruction of hamas many times? the control of gaza and finding their captives was very obvious . many zionist officials announced recently that we are witnessing a creeping movement that they are changing the goals in their literature, for example, the newspaper

and taking control of there. what happened that these positions are changing so much and that in he announced that we are not looking to occupy gaza at all . we are witnessing the next reaction in front of me. the internal security minister of the regime, who has a special personality, has threatened that if this process continues, we will leave the cabinet and the government will fall . see in 206, when the war between the zionist regime and hezbollah happened in southern lebanon, the war started when hezbollah captured two. a zionist was captured and the war started. the zionist regime

set a goal for itself, that is, several goals. when it entered the lebanese territory from the south of lebanon, it said, "we want to destroy hezbollah." it means that it set one goal for itself: to expel hezbollah from the political life of lebanon , that is, from the government. in this second issue, hezbollah could not release the two captives, and when it came, it occupied southern

lebanon and finally said, well, we don't want to destroy hezbollah, exactly the same things that you just said, and the zionist regime is talking now. kaneh later said, well, the lebanese people can solve that political problem by themselves. he said these two captives. let's go out first and he was able to retreat and the war stopped . it was also issued by the security council , later it entered into negotiations. now, i think the same situation in 2006 is being discussed . their goals are changing, one

is a soft male, just like this. the way he walked to you 206 in lebanon, i think it means all the things we have we see, now i think there is one way, this way is a ceasefire and the army of the zionist regime must leave gaza, and later they will enter into negotiations, now through

your mediation. qatar, egypt, some countries that have relations from both sides, hamas also said that the release of prisoners can only be done through negotiation, otherwise, you will not get this alive, thank you, and now there is also a discussion, well, it has been more intense for a few weeks in the babalmandb area there. yemeni forces. it had been a month since the zionist ships or the ships going to the zionist ports had been blocked by the united states and england to defend the interests of the regime. the zionists entered the scene last friday morning , they attacked some places in yemen, but during this time we saw that these attacks had no effect and the yemeni resistance continued its attacks

. targeting and of course the coming of the americans to bombard a few more areas. finally, today we had the positions of the secretary general of ansarullah in yemen, who said that we will continue our operations, why did the situation not go as the americans wanted, and what do you think? in the end , see how the story of babolmandb will go, from the first time america invited to at that time, this naval alliance also meant doubt. there was a big doubt about why the us coalition called for a maritime coalition. ansarullah said that we don't want to enter, that means

we don't want to cut off this connection or sea line. the rest of us don't want it. when america announced that we want to create a naval alliance, we saw the big arab countries like saudi arabia, the emirates of jordan, egypt , the refusal of european countries like italy and spain. america came first and forcibly named them . later they said that we want to leave. shim from the only country that now, when it was just last friday, when there were four countries, the united states , england, the netherlands, and this small government of bahrain, is not there. finally, until now, i think the goal, the goal, the overall goal of this maritime coalition, i think

it has 3 goals. . one is to transfer public opinion from gaza to another place, because gaza is now a trend even in western countries, and even for israel, for america, this means that they cannot stand in front of the public opinion of the world, and finally they want to transfer this public opinion to another place. this is bablamande and the red sea, this is one issue second, protection on the sea line. it is the place where it goes in eilat, eilat, and those

cities of the zionist regime, the main ports of the zionist regime, this is the second issue, the third issue is one of the goals, i think that there is an undeclared goal for america to come here to settle in this area and this goal is the issue of hodeidah and ansarullah because of this. it became clear that they are not even a small force to this important highway which is babolmende and the red sea in the hands of ansar allah, and this coming to close the sea in this way and in front of these ships that are going is built by the zionist regime and this is not tolerable for america. i think a declaration of goals it has not been done for america, and this hodeidah is one of

the deployments in this region, and finally they want to make an impact and diminish the plan of ansar allah in this region . the zionist media announced that the us government is still trying to normalize relations between saudi arabia and israel. the process of normalization that the americans started 3 years ago with operation storm. al-aqsa was stopped here in the white house about 3 years ago when the heads of the emirates of bahrain

signed the normalization document with the zionist regime. the joining of its third and fourth member, namely the government of maghreb and sudan, gained more momentum after the initial excitement of the council. the reconciliation process, which had become slower and slower due to the opposition of the nations , was completely stopped with the occurrence of a surprise, namely the al-aqsa storm operation. again, the zionists were hopeful. with the achievement of their goals , that is, the destruction of hamas, the path of reconciliation will return to before. we hope that relations

will be normalized after the destruction of hamas. but after more than 100 the day after the defeat of the zionists in the al-aqsa storm operation, the zionists were brought to the hague court on charges of genocide and the expansion of international support for palestine. the governments that make the gamble of normalization with the zionist regime as an example and way of working for

themselves, they will lose. losing is waiting for them . they are making a mistake, as the europeans say, they are betting on a losing horse. mojtaba shah soni , sda news agency in the second case of tonight's program, we have the opportunity to discuss the situation in the region after the al-aqsa storm, and in this regard, ms sanaz fakhravar, reporter and expert of the international group of sed and radio news agency, is with us, mrs. fakhravar. we have seen the report in the western media and the public opinion that has formed in the region , especially what is the situation like after the storm. hello.

first of all, i will start with the final point of the report, the words of the supreme leader who said that gambling is on a losing horse. exactly on november 13 , the french newspaper le monde published a report and said that the al-aqsa operation collapsed the zionist regime's false hymen. the supreme leader pointed and said that this is exactly the same interpretation the countries that cooperate are actually gambling on the losing horse, that is, calling the same losing horse the lemond of france . the most important thing that i had in the area was the publication of

the article published two days ago. the title of how the war in gaza strengthened and revived the axis of resistance, and there are many interesting points in it, such as the fact that when ansar allah was the target of the american attack , it came to the top of the news in the past days and this shows. that how important can this group be, and after that, the attacks that, for example, hezbollah of iraq has sent its cruise missile to haifa, hezbollah of lebanon, the resistance it is doing in the south of lebanon and the resistance of hamas forces in the region shows how well these forces are trained. and how much this war has made the unity between them increase

and even unity. it goes beyond the region and we even see african countries declaring their support for their anti-apartheid and anti- colonial movements, which are supporting this resistance that has formed another part of farin. efiers addresses the fact that the resistance front has not been formed recently. the resistance front was formed in 2003, when iraq was the target of the american attack, and their common goal is out. removing america from the region, and now the same common goal, the same hatred of american and israeli colonialism , is bringing them closer together, and what has happened in the meantime is that public opinion has also been greatly affected, and in fact, the operation al-aqsa has revived the cause of palestine and people have left more . yes, i am quoting what

was written in fareh nafarz. and another point is that it has been said that how much the statements have changed. until now, in the statements issued by the resistance groups in the region, regional discussions and even religious discussions were discussed, but now it has taken on an international flavor, and for example, when the housya announced that israeli ships attack in the red sea, declaring that they are acting on article 1 of the convention on the prevention of genocide, all member states can prevent this, and they are doing exactly that, and as long as the genocide continues , they continuing this work means that faren nefers says that literature has become the axis of global resistance yes, he is saying exactly that he is acting in a fully documented way and he is also giving this warning to the western authorities that this war with israel and the formation of anger that the people have against israel's brutality.

a week ago, he emphasized that the killing of the people of gaza has tarnished america's image, and despite the fact that america has felt all these years that it is investing in israel, it is ruining it, and america has shown at the global level that he cannot do anything and in fact he has lost his image in the field of diplomacy. there is another newspaper that has now addressed this issue, and that too belongs to a weekly newspaper guardian who said: