iran is the limit of farsha. 4 o'clock the foreign ministers of iran and pakistan for the second time. they discussed iran's missile attack on the terrorists' base in pakistan. mr. amir abdullahian, in response to the phone call of his pakistani counterpart, while reading the importance of pakistan's position in iran's foreign policy, said that it is appropriate to focus on security and military cooperation that was agreed upon in the past. the emphasis of the authorities of the two countries should be followed seriously, the minister of foreign affairs emphasized that according to the evidence and documentation, more than 50

terrorists in the camp that was attacked are preparing to carry out a terrorist act against it was iran that failed with the timely action of the iranian forces. jalil abbas jilani also said in this telephone conversation: "terrorists are our common enemy. terrorists and enemies of tehran- islamabad relations should not be allowed to abuse." foreign minister of pakistan also from mr. amir abdullahian. he invited islamabad for an official visit. 3 million and 100 thousand smart electricity meters have been installed for subscribers so far. according to the distribution coordination deputy of tawanir company, these meters are currently installed for the subscribers of the agricultural sector, and other sectors are also in turn to be installed. this is the program. that kidney

by the summer of next year, the subscribers of the commercial sector , who have more than a thousand kilowatt hours of consumption per month , will be equipped with smart meters, so that we can analyze their information from the monitoring center. they are in the country until summer. next year they will be equipped with smart controls. the deadline for health assessment of new students upon entering primary school for the next academic year is only until the end of march. the deputy minister of education stated that it is necessary to measure the academic readiness of children aged 4 to 7 years he added that taking turns can only be done with the system of growth and education. our priority is the children

who are now in preschool age and will go to the first grade in october 1403, but we have the conditions of our centers as well as the tools that are being used to measure children from the age of four and we can actually accept new students from the age of if we are four years old, we will examine their vision and hearing as well as health issues. their academic readiness and intelligence are examined here. with the spread of corona and influenza in turkey, 90 special care departments of hospitals in this country are filled is. turkish health authorities advised citizens to wear masks and maintain social distance . the densely populated cities of turkey have been affected by diseases since a month ago

, health experts advise people to return to their lives masks and social distancing as during the corona epidemic to prevent hospitalization. since

the corona epidemic, scientists have indicated that the spread of viral diseases due to population density and air pollution in large cities of turkey has an uncontrollable epidemic speed . the importance of elections in electing a strong parliament is the key, it is in the hands of the people. iranian coach sharaf iran has a telegram playing with the whole country. why

is this month pricing? your question is an interesting question . in the board of directors, we don't want a footballer to take out his insurance according to what he does. it is amazing , it is recognized intelligently, i don't agree with any kind of treatment, we are in the name of allah, rahman rahim, the viewer of a new episode of the program, you are higher, the problem of population growth and. its relationship with the progress and welfare of the society is a topic that has been discussed more in the academic circles for several years. find out about this in this part of the above program we will discuss how suitable the current cultural, economic and social conditions of iran are for us to have a population increase policy and basically

how effective this policy will be in these conditions. the higher program on the eve of the parliamentary elections is about different views and attitudes on cultural issues. stay with us politically and socially. in this part of the program , we are hosting mr. masoud alami, a member of the academic staff of allameh tabatabai university, a lecturer in the field of population policy, as well as mr. mohammad reza asnafi, a social and media researcher. mr. snuffy, with a question from his excellency we start the program. in the virtual space , in one of the social networks , you had expressed a point of view related to the discussion of population increase policies , you had said that you are against mechanical child rearing and that the conditions of parents and the conditions of society are actually

seen in the issue of population policies and child rearing technology. would it be possible for you to talk a little about this matter for us, in the name of allah, the merciful , the most merciful, i offer my courtesy and respect to you, dear viewers . look, doctor, the issue of having children is a multifaceted and multifaceted process, in fact , it requires solving the problem and looking at the problem. from a systemic point of view, the set of factors that lead to a family deciding to add another member to itself or forming a family and adding a child to its family is a set of factors. that if we do not look at this in a systematic way and only one-dimensionally want to influence this decision by creating local restrictions or incentives, it will not be that successful, and if it happens, it will not achieve our desired result. why?

it is not successful because the family is the opposite of a politician who looks one-dimensionally, sometimes only a legislator in a closed room, he looks at the issue from one angle , he doesn't look at the country's capabilities, and we see this in the same law on the youth of the population . it has been implemented after two years , the legislators themselves and the legislators who are in the parliament are not satisfied with the process of implementing the law. this shows that the same process of the law that includes 200 orders in this law is 200 mandates and 200 orders are more than 200 orders. has approved the country's capabilities , the government's economic capabilities have not paid attention to these, the family is like this the decision making process is a process that makes decisions based on its needs based on its conditions . therefore, this law will not succeed because it has not seen a system. in addition, if these

local incentives, such as giving priority in the car lottery or land allocation, which are very hash also in full. it has not been realized, even if these things work, because we have not seen a system where the population becomes the driving force of the country's development, it will hinder the country's development in the future and... this one -dimensional view that we use an incentive for a stimulus. enter something and then wait for a suitable output and those outputs should work according to the conditions of the country , this is a mechanical view , in addition to the fact that in the law, unfortunately, instead of paying more attention to the cultural aspect of the law, the legislator basically looks at this as a socio-cultural phenomenon by imposing restrictions on various types for example , in applying restrictions on methods of preventing pregnancy, this seems

to intensify the cultural dimension, that is, it creates a repulsion for the law, a kind of free will and the wise and mature power of the family in making decisions in this area. the questioner said, i am thinking for you i will create a series of restrictions for you in this way. this law has several provisions due to the sections of the materials in it . one is about tracking and tracing after pregnancy. in the discussion of insemination experiments , each of which may have supporters and opponents, basically, we include this issue in the law, which says that our goal is to increase the population, this is counterproductive, and to have children in families that are formed in large numbers. it gives it an ideological load and even a political meaning gives and this itself as my opinion.

dear mr. alami, regarding this issue , we should have this view that we should wait for the people to get better or for the rest of the conditions and aspects to improve and we will come later. let's make a policy in the field of population increase and childbearing. what is your view on this matter , in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, i offer my greetings and courtesy to my dear viewers, sarkari and mr. asnafi . you see, the discussion of population policy has been going on for about 30-40 years now. countries that are caught up in the issue of aging have gradually changed their policies

these countries are also diverse, from countries that are economically good , such as germany and japan, and countries that are somewhat lower, such as bulgaria and other places. . but even if we leave that criterion aside, we have a time to actually compensate for the issue of old age, because you have a young population capable of fertility, which if they pass a certain age , you will not be able to compensate for this issue, while the period we are talking about we do to solve the problem of old age from now on, it means that whatever we are planning now

, we want to see the results in about 30 years. do we actually have economic problems? let's solve the economic problems in the meantime, and even if those economic problems remain, a new problem called old age will be added to our other problems . if you don't solve a problem, it will add to your other problems and even more i would like to add that the solution of part of our economic problems, which i will explain now if possible , is dependent on the solution of the population problem. you see, now a country like japan , we forget its economic growth and the japan

we know with brands like sony and panasonic, etc. this is young japan , now old japan, its economic growth is going down. germany has problems like this , so i don't know about it. a country that is getting old or has not thought of solving that problem. therefore, it is a rational and logical rule that if you want to prevent your old age in the future, and we have this opportunity we also have it. in 30 years, we will reach a place where , just like the current generation, we need it for another 30 years. many of these investments will pay off in 20 years or 10 years. are these

trends our trends of 10 years ? let's look at the past 20 years, the past 30 years, the future is anything but. the past number is not up to today. you see, we were able to solve these problems, but now we want to add the population to this. well, i think that in those matters, at least we are losing time . there are signs that serious and significant changes in the rate investing in the country is now something in addition to investment, we have a depreciation rate , which means that investment should always be more than that . 2 years ago, it is less than that, which means that our investment is not enough to maintain the current situation, and it is less than maintaining the current situation. with these trends, we assume a population. let's add to the existing population of the country and those other prerequisites such as investment, which leads to production , we should not do this

. parliament's research on the future of energy iran, which has been published publicly , has also been published, some parts of hashim have not been published , they are only available to the authorities, we have to refer to them, let's see the future of the country if we do not invest seriously in the gas industry, will we be able to be a gas exporter in 7 years? we are currently in the winter season. in the winter season we are in , we have a gas shortage in some of our power plants . yes, if we make a serious investment, does the country's economic conditions allow it, for example, us? in the next 3 years, in the next 5 years , we will invest 20 billion dollars in the electricity sector. if we can , such an investment will show the economic reality of the country. yes, the population can also be added to this. which of these did not happen in the past years, and these investments

will pay off in 20 years. the point i am saying is that if we do not think about these things, the population will become a disadvantage of the country in the future instead of acting as a disadvantage. to threaten the economic country that is supposed to sell oil between 80 let's divide millions of this economy that doesn't lead to production, this sale of underground, national and intergenerational capital, if it doesn't lead to investment , if we are going to sell oil, let's divide it and all of us consume together, so let's make this denominator as low as possible. i say for our benefit, if this transformation is not supposed to happen. he said that we don't see the signs of transformation, so let's at least choose between the bad and the worse choice . mr. alami, i will ask for your answer. and unemployed, for example, unemployment

has not been solved by population reduction, employment policy and economic policy. it is a science, a science, and a management that has nothing to do with me wanting to reduce the population. i would like to tell you even more, checking the statistics of the world bank shows that there is no country in the world whose income per capita has decreased due to the increase in population. it means the share of each person in the total income of the country. not only has it decreased , but it has not even remained constant in all the countries of the world, with the increase in population, the share of each person in their income has increased, and that is with the constant dollar of 2017. what does it mean? that is, remove inflation from it, the statistics of the world bank show this, so unlike the past

, the scientific literature of the world has also changed, now it is about 40 years old, 50 years old, for example, the book of source qai, or now it is latinized as limit resource, is related to julian simon's writing in 1981. he writes the book and what he means by the ultimate source is that the population is the main source of economic growth. here i will open a parenthesis. mr. snafi says that there is currently a problem in the distribution of resources and they have a question about what it means. during their talks, they mentioned that when we have a problem in the distribution of resources we exist. how can we expect growth in the future with more population?

it has nothing to do with the size of the population, and i said that it is the opposite of food, that is, the population is a potential and an energy that drives the economy forward. it means that now india is the only country that did not establish any family planning policy and now its population is even higher than china. you see , many theories now confirm that the prerequisite for the growth of the economy, especially the knowledge-based economy , which is now being said a lot, well, let's replace humans with machinery, in fact, it is mechanized. kanim has shown that no, even for the knowledge-based economy, i will give you an example let's make it very simple for our dear viewers

, america has about 10 times as many faculty members as iran. if we consider articles and books as one of the scientific outputs, if iran's faculty members work 24 hours a day, would they be able to do as much? in fact, american academics can't produce articles and books , it's not possible at all, so we have a necessary condition for progress, and that population says that the population science institution wants the maritime industry of the russian maritime industry. this statistic is from a few years ago. it has half a million engineers, so look, if we don't have this manpower, there will be no progress at all it is not possible. now

we have 8368 knowledge-based companies . if it wasn't for the 60s, the false term "population bomb" would actually be used . we have people who believe that the population causes economic growth, so the issue is completely reversed, it means that the population is not only a consumer . pay attention. . it can be a producer and this production is usually more than it is a personal need, so more population

means more production, not more consumption. mr. snafi , they know population as a necessary condition for economic progress and growth. this is no doubt. the clear issue is whether we repeat my previous sentence without saying. is it without looking at the rest of the necessary variables and having a system look at it? can we reach this point or not? let me say a few things. one is that, for example, now i never refer the bank the world. now, i think that the honesty of international institutions should be viewed with doubt, but one of the most serious recommendations of the world bank to iran in the 70s

was one of the preconditions for granting long-term loans to iran's economy in those years, which was never realized. it didn't work, it was the population control policies . by the way, if we want to refer to that side, we can see that no, this population increase policy is a policy that is against the recommendations of the world bank, which by the way, in my opinion , is correct from this aspect . another issue is that the economy iran cannot be compared with any economy in the world because we have a serious variable called sanctions in this economy that we are planning our economy without paying attention to the reality called sanctions that have been around for almost 20 years, that is, they always said that iran was under sanctions, but these new sanctions around the nuclear issue have been realized. it has been almost 20 years now, which means that we are slowly facing a generational economic phenomenon without looking at this fact and that other versions that have worked in other countries

will be copied in iran. i think it is successful. we will not be able to. the final point that i want to make in this regard is that this population phenomenon is more than we want to enter it through the economic door. if something is going to happen, it will happen through the cultural door. this economic path shows the facts that nothing will change. look, yes, we hope that these are economic problems. serious decisions should be made in the country, but consider the fact that we cannot develop all the sectors together. population growth is not, these are the infrastructures of economic development yes, not all the country's population is going to become oil addicts, but a series of infrastructures such as energy and roads are now in the field.

the way good things have happened, like water, these are the things that are required as a prerequisite for any economic activity in any economy. another point, let me give an example. look, in the 60s, we had an index, a support index in pension funds and funds whose duty is to support people in the future. from the period of employment, this index was 29 in the early 60s in the 1960s, which means that there is one retiree for every salaried person. people were working and paying insurance premiums. this index today in while the people born in the 1960s, which form the population of countries around 17-18 , are at the peak of their maturity, which means that the peak of the population has reached the point where they are working in the same production industry. in a situation where the best situation of our population now that

we are talking is in the 60's and 70's. while they are entering this age, the support index of our pension funds is between 56 , that is why all of them are now in a broken state of your government. look at the budget every year and see why the government should spend thousands of billions per year on pension funds from the general budget. has this it happens and so on. as one of the serious economic crises of the country in the past years and whatever we see in the future , it will get worse, the pension funds , let's keep it here . and in this field, the situation of iran should not be compared with other countries, and it should be measured by its own indicators . please give your opinion and answer on this. now, of course

, their argument was that iran is an embargoed country. just yesterday, i was reading a news that america with policies he has sanctioned half of the world's economy , so it is not only our country , but different countries are sanctioned in different ways and things, but the sanctions have nothing to do with the issue

of population. it receives from the iranian statistics center and in fact the central bank. thank you for your presence , so iran's economy is not really separate . being unemployed now , they raise the issue of not being able to access resources in fact, according to the research that was done, comparing between generations, that is, between the generations of the 60s, 40s, 50s, 70s, and even a part of the 80s, we saw that by the way, the employment of these people is more than the employment of the 60s, and that too in