a temporary order has been issued for the zionist regime to stop its military operations in gaza. at the same time , we are witnessing a gathering in front of the hague court. supporters of palestine have been there since a few hours ago, and like previous fridays, we witnessed a large gathering in sana'a, the capital of yemen. i request my colleagues to unite the glorious gathering of yemenis in sana'a . we will be with you again in the continuation and we will discuss the discussion with the international law experts. al-maqdisa rejects the brutal crimes committed by the zionists against our brothers in gaza. mujahid's greatness

and with the support of their own people , they support all the steps of fatah al mobin and are also steadfast in the holy jihad. they do not get tired of their firm position in supporting and supporting the palestinian nation , and they do not accept compromise regarding the palestinian issue. take it and get ready. for

general mobilization in this holy battle and this is the nation of yemen , they go out together every week and demonstrate in millions and widely to show their own dependence and the proud position of the yemenis and they emphasize the following points in this demonstration , firstly, the yemeni nation.

they, as well as attacking hospitals and camps and bombing buildings, these are a great war crime of genocide, which

we used to say that what the palestinian people, freedom fighters, and patriots of the world wanted

was fulfilled. how do you feel as a person who has studied international law for years? he has taught and now he sees that the day has finally come. that this institution was able to enter the case of the palestinians and the leaders of the zionist regime are mentioned as perpetrators of genocide in the world. width hello and respect to you and the viewers of the program. well, first of all, i need to know that for my part , as a small member of the legal community, i really appreciate the courage of the judges of the international court of justice. i appreciate and thank you, although almost all of the 9 demands that south africa had have not been paid attention to, but in my opinion, in the framework of legal restrictions, the main

point has been made well. and it's very interesting that actually someone. who has been claiming to be a victim of the holocaust almost on the eve of this anniversary he is being accused of genocide and is officially being asked by the international court of justice as the highest international judicial pillar and as the main judicial pillar of the united nations to stop his genocide practices against the palestinian group. let me say a few things about the process of this case, because sometimes legal words or legal terms each have their own meaning. well, since south africa came and i think it bravely

took this initiative and submitting this petition to the registry, which should be done due to the length of proceedings in the international court of justice and and in fact , to preserve what is the subject of the dispute, a request should be made to the court to issue a temporary order, that is, in this particular case , especially the israeli regime, should not take measures to eliminate the issue of the dispute , until the court wants a decision. at this stage, we are faced with the question of whether: south africa was able to convince the court that, first of all, apparently, not to say 100%, that is, with a high percentage, the issue comes back to a treaty dispute. international between two countries means existence

the dispute and after the prime office court, or apparently according to this unanimous decision, in fact and at least has a q and whether south africa has a position in the dispute or not, because sometimes the question may be raised that israel is doing its actions in what is gaza doing against the palestinian people? what does the court have to do with south africa? well, mrs. president, the court explained very well the side of the dispute that the genocide convention is based on. it is not the mutual interest of the countries, but it is actually based on the common interest all countries and the international community are included in it, so any country that is a party to this convention , if it feels that other countries or countries

are not fulfilling their obligations under this convention, it has the right and sometimes the obligation to come to the international court of justice. international justice against the offender. in fact , we had this in the case of gambia against myanmar, where it is actually the same issue of protecting the common interest, that is, because the issue is related to a basic human right that is universal and accepted by everyone, the issue is that now both sides must in that story not every country in the world could enter because it is a humanitarian issue, of course it should have signed the convention, including africa. see, in fact, this goes back to the nature of the prohibition of genocide because we are dealing with a human group. in other human rights treaties, we

talk more about individual rights, but here we are talking about the rights of individuals because they belong to a group. we will make a point that i thought was interesting in this vote, that many people believe that israel is saying that i am only doing these actions against hamas. tenth, not against the palestinian people, but the court actually did not make this distinction, at least here. and he has said that hamas and other armed groups and all those who are in gaza form a supported palestinian group, whether it is a racial group , a national group, a religious group, or an ethnic group, that is, these four groups that are supported well, here, in fact, we are not faced with the definitive jurisdiction of the court, even though we really want to say that the court has proven that genocide is committed. we are not facing what was committed by the zionist regime

i'm not going to do this, i told you how many stages there are, that is, we are one stage, the first stage, but this first stage is exactly for the sake of supporting the humanitarian group , because if this action is not carried out, then israel will do its job and then there will be no human in gaza at all. that is why we want to say later that these are actually victims of genocide , so it is logical that because of the length of the proceedings , israel will be asked to stop its actions . south africa read a statement as soon as these talks begin, we will go directly to the hague, holland , and we will hear the statement of the south african delegation after the first verdict of the court. mr. dr. yeh, the references we heard the judge of the court made were explicit statements

that the officials of this regime themselves said in front of the camera. it was said that maybe in the past cases of genocide, it should have been found that someone had committed an act somewhere, then now they bring up his malice to prove it or not. here, the judge of the court included the words of gallant, the minister of war of the regime, in his judgment, which at the beginning jang glant said that the palestinians are the people who are in that gaza excuse me, animals, don't be human, and he said frankly, we will cut off the water , we will cut off the electricity , we will cut off the food. it was a long time ago. you can't put them under investigation. it's an interesting point. maybe these are one of the reasons. it can be said that the israelis

carried out all these actions with complete brutality and violence, it was the self-confidence that they had that no one would prosecute them, or at least some kind of responsibility, at least from the united states of america is there for them, which prevents an international court from entering, but the fact is that the public opinion that exists, and especially the initiative of south africa , i apologize, as if the representative of south africa in front of the court wants to start talking directly to the netherlands. i am going to announce to the viewers of the news channel again today the preliminary decision of the hague court regarding the african complaint. south was issued from the zionist regime for the installation in gaza. the court

confirmed its jurisdiction to investigate this case. he also asked the zionist regime to end its military operations stop palestine and gaza and submit a report of his actions to the court after one month . the judgment of the court and these two cases are unprecedented in history.

it was very important to deal with the petition that we had due to the necessity and need to protect the civilians who are in palestine and to ensure that south africa does not provide humanitarian aid to the case that it has presented in the hague so that the hague court can . show your responsibility to protect the civilians who are being killed. currently, all the members of the united nations have committed to this until now. that we should help humanity at present south africa

raised the issue in the hague court that we cannot tolerate the killing of people who are being killed every day in this region, so this very important case was brought up and the reports of the report were presented to the hague court to take measures based on the genocide convention to hold the israeli government accountable. let's do justice and be responsible, let's deal with the killing of civilians and the actions that israel is doing, as well as hamas. he should release the hostages and we

are very committed to this and we believe that now. we must do the things we need to do for government negotiations in this region so that these conflicts do not continue. i believe that a ceasefire must be established in order to carry out the order that we had today . we are looking for this to happen. did it happen? a statement has been made in this regard. i am really disappointed in this regard, but we hope that the humanitarian aid will reach the people in a very effective manner, and the military can we need

that truce right now so that this action can be taken for its implementation. this truce should take place and hamas should release the hostages . i am of the opinion that i believe that the judgment of the court actually stated very clearly and quickly everything and all the precautionary measures that should be taken were taken into account in it and i believe.

issued, is it going to be continued that we should emphasize the necessity of its implementation and the fact is that based on the reports that are on the agenda in a month which is very important and should be done . the fact is that the court and the members who were present today made a decision based on these reports. what is stated in the convention is that israel has actually violated these conditions, and there is a need to implement measures in the field of implementing the ceasefire in a logical and complete manner, as well as to

provide the necessary conditions for civilians. to be present in the region, and the court also showed that this convention should be implemented and put into practice in a completely practical way, which is a necessary basis

for the international community to reach a conclusion. in the case of what is happening in that area, this should happen, we should seek peace and resolve the conflicts in this area. as far as i know, the convention and the countries that believe in it are demanding measures to deal with it based on this convention. i believe that what hamas has done is very harmful and the hostages should be released soon. the voice of the questioner is not very clear. do you hope

that a political solution will be found to solve this problem? yes, i hope that the processes will be as before. go so we can. we should reach a two-state solution in palestine. i think that this issue will not end today or tomorrow, but efforts must be made and trials and errors must be made so that people do not wait in this field, and we all must obey the laws. let us respect the international community if a way is opened for

something to be done, but if this does not happen , we will see that a way will be opened for those who can violate international laws in all conflicts.

you have seen the speech of the minister of foreign affairs of south africa in front of the hague court let me know what happened today that the laha court has its jurisdiction to investigate. he accepted gaza and considered south africa's evidence and the evidence presented in this context to be sufficient to be able to start the case and begin its investigation. this case may continue for months or years, but what is clearly evident is that for the first time in history the heads of the zionist regime must answer before the international court for committing war crimes and committing genocide. goshen also asked the court to stop the operations that can make this genocide in gaza more widespread, mr. nezhandim.

we were talking when the foreign minister of africa started speaking. let me continue to serve you. i would like to mention one more thing, and that is that today's vote is actually an order, it is not a decision at all. the issue is that the court's jurisdiction is not confirmed, which means that there is a possibility that the court's jurisdiction means that the court may say at the next stage that i do not have jurisdiction, but here i told you in general only to issue a temporary order. bekne says i am ali al-zahir i am qualified. but what is going to happen next, we will go back to the stage of competence and ability to be heard, that is, what he announced today regarding the evidence that you are

discussing. south africa does not have the jurisdiction to file a lawsuit here, and the court does not have the jurisdiction to hear it. now, see what the situation has been in this case . in fact, the court just wants to say that, based on this preliminary ruling that has been presented, i have jurisdiction at least to issue a temporary order, but we may have assumptions. in fact, we will raise it maybe in the next stage, which will be the preliminary stage of objections the initial iranians who raise the issue themselves may have jurisdiction and the ability to hear the israeli regime and say that the court does not have jurisdiction, for example, it does have jurisdiction, but the case cannot be heard, so we are actually saying here that the court has issued a temporary order. it does not mean that the jurisdiction of the court is definitive.

it's not going to happen anymore. we will talk about the difference between these and their meanings in the future after the 17 news, we will be with the viewers of the khabar network again .

this is a capital carpet, which is woven by machine, but it is 100 wool like hand-woven, and the finishing steps are also manual the work is more interesting than that, the price is a quarter. the price of hand-woven has a guarantee. i have never seen a machine-made carpet so similar to hand-woven. i'm sorry. i'm sorry . you can buy a carpet in kasi. yes, you can buy. i'm sorry , mr. mr. farsh. buy capital carpet only in mr. farsh branches. who is behind this order? who is behind this

recipe? panella's recipe is a new change . panella is the enemy of high cholesterol. panella is the choice of a person . panella is the secret of this great cooking. the price is guaranteed it guarantees a valid price along with a written guarantee , so if you find a lower price , bring an invoice, in addition to the price difference of 20%, you will also get a bonus from the specialized reference of household appliances in the city of household appliances.

hello asher, dear compatriots, we present the news at 17:00 together with my colleagues. the head of the international court of justice asked the zionist regime to take all necessary measures to prevent mass killing and genocide . the reason for the genocide in the gaza strip, which ended a few minutes ago, is the israeli attacks on gaza caused widespread destruction and killed a large number of palestinian citizens. he asked the zionist regime to submit a report within a month about all temporary measures to prevent mass murder.