basically, it was created to be able to prevent such crimes in the international arena. mr. shajere says that there should be no hope, and just as that order is not ideal , it will not bring about a change in the situation. we should not invest too much attention on this. let's turn to the court , you agree, i am grateful to your guest, mr. shajar , for the points that you actually raised, perhaps this is the point of view of many viewers and observers. it's okay, but while respecting their opinion, allow me not to be too friendly. in that previous conversation, i actually mentioned that i said that criminal law is between in any case, international law has a criminal aspect, like criminal law in all legal systems, prevention of crime and deterrence, as well as ending the impunity of perpetrators of international crimes , are among the goals that have been set for it, but because in the international arena, anyway there are events and justice. along with politics, it is actually pursued and

sometimes it will be defeated by stating another goal for the global criminal justice system, which precedes those two other goals, and if it is achieved , the efficiency of this system will still be confirmed, even though well, expectations with this view it is adjusted realistically, and that function is to express and record the truth, to give a voice to the victims who are silent, and to record the truth of the fact that these behaviors are crimes on the newspaper. history through actually proving its verification in an international authority, what was achieved today means that regardless of what the substantive and final verdict will be in the future, i think it had some achievements from a legal point of view. it ensured a lot, that is, it identified and verified the oppression of the palestinian people and the fact that the palestinian people were victims of crime that actually two weeks ago the south african government.

in the meeting, shafaei was actually bringing up his own healing, and today, we the international court of justice heard them from ghazat's language, contrary to what mr. shajare said in the initial petitions, i said that even the president of the court gave a positive vote. the american of divan voted yes because of the confusion, it was actually these cases, not that there was actually a secret conspiracy behind him, he says that basically it is not very important that this person wants a positive vote. he brought up these crimes and became a voice for the oppressed people of palestine it will be a month since saying this commitment to another report. today, the israeli regime knows that it is under the microscope. it has been answered for the first time in the history of its establishment in front of an international authority. the international court is required to answer and another matter

it is also hinting that it will have a tremendous effect on the discussion of the supporters and governments of the israeli regime, because today the court was not going to confirm that the murder was not one of the defects of the court , it was in its legal system, but it confirmed that there are signs of genocide. it is serious, there is a serious danger this means that all the governments that are members of the convention on proportionality, including the united states and other european governments that support israel , are committed to preventing this so-called accusation.

it should be heard and brought up in court . i told you, a slave for south africa, but for the palestinian people, the court did not even come to say that targeting hospitals is unacceptable, and from now on , they should not be targeted, all that was done was a series of arguments. kurd, what does the international law of sexting make illegal, he says that this work. this work is illegal and the government is evil the zionist argument has been this all along, and its supporters , the united states, britain, and the rest of their argument is that the evil zionist government did not do this and did it within the framework of the law. they did not come to say that this is not true.

doing this work, this work, this work is unacceptable from the point of view of international law and this should not be done . the zionists and america and other supporters are saying that this is a slave because it shows that they will not do this and their commitment was that they will not do this. there is no way to prevent this massacre or to reduce its intensity even more. these rulings of today do not last a century. look at the international courts . their history is the same, so far they have not stopped bosnia, nor stopped mass killings and mass crimes because they are more political than legal and unfortunately

, international frameworks such as international courts and the united nations have vetoes and so on. in no way the answer to the wedge of justice. yes, thank you, mr. shajare, i have a final question, i want you to discuss another topic tonight. let's mention that in the remaining time, i think mr. zakir hossein is the right choice to start this discussion . mr. zakir hossein . now, the officials of our country's diplomatic system issued a statement today. even in the non-commitment meeting, the representative of iran who was present invited other countries to join and

support south africa. it can remain political or not there are more measures to be taken. in any case , we are not in a field where we have not done anything for palestine. now this legal debate and the court, some people believe that why iran did not go to complain like south africa? because we are also members of the convention. i would like to allow me to start my conversation very briefly with mr. shajere's closing statements , and then go into the year. be sure to see, in my opinion, i invite only my friends who are critics to read the vote in its entirety, that is, in my opinion, a part of the vote was outstanding , but also pay attention to many of the words of the vote. mr. shajare not only did not say what genocide is, the court based on

the evidence provided by south africa, i.e. the accusations against israel, accepted that there are signs of genocide, and based on this temporary order, mr. shajare you have started dealing with south africa in this field, which means that from now on, other governments can express their support for south africa with the help of this lawsuit and this legal battle, and one of these governments and these candidates is definitely the government of the islamic republic of iran. do? you see, governments can actually do it with two or three the model based on the statute of the international court of justice itself is to join the lawsuit of south africa against israel. one model is to actually say that we ourselves are zainaf, like south africa, and be a party to the lawsuit, but

i think it is a better model. and this model can be followed, and it is recommended to the government of the islamic republic of iran to find an interpretive entry based on article 63 of the statute of the international court of justice. it means that he is actually doing for the benefit of what south africa actually has, and his interpretation of the neskaji convention has its own legal justification. and he should come up with his own legal interpretation, for example, about the method of ascertaining the intent of genocide, which is a constituent element of this crime, and similar cases. let me give you an example . zad volud is actually in that target group , it is among the palestinians. how did he refer to this and state that in fact, the zionist regime has prevented safe childbirth with these consecutive attacks , the iranian government can come in and provide an interpretation and state that, for example, creating the conditions for ayman's childbearing , it can also be an example of installing a gazi

, and if this interpretation is found, then that branch will not be considered to actually enter darwa tarafi and possibly recognize israel, not only does it have an international obligation, because i myself am a member. based on that , south africa should prevent collusion, which is also doing its duty , the internal regulations that exist, that is, both the law to counter the hostile actions of the zionist regime in 2009 and the law requiring the government to support the palestinian nation in 2008 oblige the iranian government to international capacities should be used in 2087 we had the same legal provision that the government has in this international court, including the international court of justice , to prosecute the international crimes of the heads of the sahim regime. as he should have and maybe he didn't do this despite the opportunities that existed in this period of time , i hope that he will actually

be able to compensate for his lack of presence in legal activism with the entry of a third party that he finds this time. thank you very much, mr. ferdowsipour, what do you think? you are a diplomat yourself diplomats also speak cautiously. this discussion also goes back to the ministry of foreign affairs. what do you think we should do? there is a justification in this story. this is that any action by us against sahim regime. in an international court, it means recognizing this right regime. see, i think this is the main point that prevents the islamic republic of iran from taking a clear action regarding this issue . the previous regime, that is, during the second pahlavi period , was with the sunni regime, after the revolution, we were almost the same about. between 300 and 350 million, if i'm not mistaken, 350 million is more correct, which

is one of the demands for the sale of energy that was made in the past, and these funds have not been returned to iran , that is, we have economic demands from this illegitimate regime, these demands of iran, well, these are long discussions. it was on the agenda for a long time that what should be done now, in one of our processes, a judicial action has been taken against this issue, i.e. reopening the case or registering in the judiciary regarding this issue, so this has been done somewhere, that is, if we want to look at the equations , somewhere we left a milestone there is a fundamental problem, but the most important point is the statement of your excellency, which you say, in fact , the approach of dejour towards the situation of the zionist regime may be one of the fundamental problems. i believe that mr. zakir hossein's opinion is correct, that is, we

can enter into the interpretation process arising from the provisions and articles of the genocide convention. let's find out and this support was given by the ministry of foreign affairs, that is, last week we had an official statement to confirm south africa's action, and this recent statement was also made in relation to the issuance of a precautionary and temporary decision by the ministry of foreign affairs that you also mentioned. point of view the important and fundamental thing is that, parallel to south africa , we have a capacity of between 30 and 35. five countries defend and support this process. if this is to become a capacity and an opportunity for south african action at the level of the international system, especially to deal with cases of crimes against gender , i believe it should be similar to south africa's action in parallel with south africa. to be more specific, i believe you mean that you see us. at the same time as south africa in other issues and cases, you should see the proceedings now, mr

zakir hossein explaining means to a large extent, it can be said that the part related to the genocide was almost accepted by the court based on the quran, the evidence and the judgment that was established, i am sorry, i cited that in fact, witnesses and documented evidence should be presented to the court, for example. either the court itself reaches such certainty that it can enter. to be a city or to issue a basic and original vote, well , in order to clarify this process, in order for this process to take shape, i believe that we have the same capacity as the countries that came forward to support south africa, why do we act similarly if they don't have south africa , they should open a new case, that is, we are saying that a group of countries will be formed. i think that south africa can be paralleled with the situation that south africa has done, which actually has the weight of entering the court to deal with the case that it claims now.

part of the evidence and evidence of genocide is positive, but it is difficult to understand whether such a genocide is really a genocide with this complaint and lawsuit presented by south africa. to what extent, deferring this to them to investigate means that they should go and find their experts to investigate this. based on documents and evidence for example, mr. shajere, i think it is accurate and correct to say that 25,000 people have been killed , that is, you . let's not have sharia that the situation of human rights, human rights and human rights, we even had some comparisons about, for example, the heaviest bombing that the allies had against germany in world war ii, and the bombing of various cities in germany, saying that the amount of bombardment that became gaza is because of it. for example, in the discussion of journalists, the number of journalists

killed in gaza in these three or four months of the entire world war second, the initial explanation of your service is more correct . i told you about this process of the court of justice regarding the issue of the genocide convention that at the first hague conference, for example, we had three conventions, which i said then the statements that came as an addendum to the convention, that is, the discussions related to the type of bullets that were used that exploded in the body. and this is under the title of, for example , the continuous shooting of the dumdam bullets that caused an internal explosion, and this was known as a crime or, for example, related to the situation. the use of chemical weapons, or let's assume chemical and biological weapons were used he brought forward the process of court proceedings and completed the conventions in fact , he made the process of court proceedings somewhat new and the situation that is formed based on the process of wars

. basically, i say this is based on the type of use of the car. the war system that was formed was not an air force at one time, the discussion was actually about the ground force and the situation of naval warfare , the conventions were focused on the part of land wars and sea wars. it came to bring the balloons after the situation of the first world war, when the airplane was used, it was a bit more progressive and better handled. anyway , see the fundamental thing that happened in this war. i say that there is no shazo because you know the situation of the bombs that it is being used from 500 kilos to 2500 kilos, and these bombs are in no way a fundamental violation in relation to the state of civil and urban society, which means that a process is needed even in

america . the percentage of bombings in gaza was carried out by the zionist regime with bombs it was unintelligent, that is, it was simply dropped from the sky , there was no specific target, let's ignore the fact that these banks have finished their goals . thank you very much, mr. ferdowsipour , mr. shajare, are you still with us? let's say then i want to ask you more specifically what do you think. what else can the islamic republic of iran do for the palestinian people in the current situation? look at this discussion that dear brother said that our dear iran can come into this so-called interest party and complain or be a partner in it.

do this, dear iran. you could have done it from the first day, or right after south africa's intervention and complaint, south africa could come and come along and cooperate and be a partner in this complaint and other countries could do it . there was no legal issue from the point of view of international laws, that iran could not do something like this, this is a very clear issue, not only. in international courts, but even in the courts of nations, where a third party can enter this case or follow this case , this is the only reason why this was not done . it was not a legal issue, it was a diplomatic and political issue.

i can't enter it, i don't have the necessary information. i don't understand what you mean , when there is no reason or obstacle, what else is wrong ? i mean, the reason is that iran did not enter into this complaint, or at all before south africa, or after it, or jointly, there was no legal problem, that is, there was no legal problem for iran to intervene. and enter into this thing, the reason for not doing this is not the problem. it was political. now, whatever reason he had , he had no legal reason in terms of international law , so on the one hand, when there is a military struggle, and when we are discussing this,

in other words, yemen, iraq, lebanon, and others who have fighters are involved in helping and accompanying the people of gaza to reduce the pressure. from that point of view, iran can really be said to be the only country that managed this issue and really left no stone unturned, but from the legal point of view, unfortunately , we did not do this very slowly, slowly, very calculatedly , many different political and diplomatic discussions, we preferred them. let's follow to enter this is an issue that the friends who are responsible for this work and the loved ones who make these decisions are responsible, but from the legal point of view, nothing

the problem was that there was no so-called barrier, nothing that would stop iran from really entering and being more active in this matter, or active with south africa or even taking the lead. be from south africa. therefore, i think that this is an issue that should be solved by our diplomatic and political frameworks. but the other discussion that you were discussing is what else iran can do, in terms of the so-called same thing that i told you, in terms of fighting. iran's resistance has really been underestimated, but in other places we are far behind other places, for example sanctions zionist products are now all over the world, even

our neighboring countries, the arab countries, are even banning coca-cola for generations, but unfortunately, in iran, these are really spreading, and there is no sanction at all, many of my friends abroad have they boycott this, when they see something in iran , they don't expect it, i am really shocked, how is it possible that iran, which is so supportive of the oppressed palestinian people , has such products freely and even in the conferences for the defense of the palestinian people , this soft drink and other things should be served, yes, sir

shajre, i thank you for your kindness . i am also grateful to your partner, mr. zakir hossein, mr. ferdowsipour, and i also have special thanks to the patient viewers of khabar network. and in the same way, maybe we were with you in the special program of the world program today. good night, god bless you. seva is a 19-year-old microbiology student . it is the first year that i am in retreat here. of course

, i am in the retreat of khadim, because service is another pleasure, and the month of rajab is the month from which we must reap the maximum virtue. choose to serve mutikafan says that even though it was my first time , i really wanted to experience this service because i feel it. which means that in addition to experiencing that retreat myself , i am also doing an additional service to an organization that will earn me a greater reward, and it feels much better to come to serve the students after graduation. university exams , taking part in another exam, then there is the exam, let's have some fun , let's be alone with god. since i came here, my mind has opened up a lot and i have become more attentive to everything.

the one who leaves everything leaves it here he leaves the mosque and comes here and talks to his god about his needs. in my opinion, this happens to god and most of us. students who see albiz days as a service practice and an opportunity for self-improvement. for three days, a person should be alone with himself, to gain self-knowledge, which is the greatest blessing that god can give to a person. that alone you can build yourself and know yourself. the person who is here is somehow invited by god, and they believe that in such a suitable opportunity , a person can strengthen his relationship with god and get a little closer to god. to be able to strengthen the relationship that has weakened many times , to be able to strengthen the congregational prayer

of breaking the fast, which is a good place to practice letting go of the world, and according to dr. chamran mafiha, one must have faith in his heart when he wants to participate in such ceremonies. and it is supposed that after these three days, they will leave some things here and take some things with them, that bag , that moral burden, and the burden of god that he can carry with him and be able to walk in his life. you feel light, you feel clean, you feel like you left your heart and you can become a new person now after that, it's up to you whether you continue this way again or go back to your previous life , it will leave a mark on your character, and the further we go, it will be with us on a plan . i was thinking about myself called moment by moment monitoring of thoughts and subsequent actions for every task. i also

made a mistake, which is very common to me, that i wrote down some of my titles, and i was punished. about 7,000 mosques across the country are hosting pilgrims this year. it has been said that the reception of youths and teenagers in this year's retreat was remarkable. amiri, sed and broadcasting news agency. various political and economic tendencies in the elections compete with each other. the importance of elections in electing a strong parliament is in the hands of the people. the government is subsidizing the price. why

is there a salary cap? it doesn't lead to productivity . above the debate of trends on the eve of the elections, every day at 15:19 hours from khabar al-azur network, wherever you are.

hello and courtesy to you, dear viewers , i will start tonight's magazine with the latest news from the national team. the team of our country followed up its preparations for the match against syria in the round of 16 of the nations cup tonight in doh. our football players' tactical training for the match against syria officially starts in the evening it started on friday. the national team says that we are ready to face any opponent. from today, all our efforts and focus is on the syria game so that we can have a good game and a good result in that game too, even though