i will not be a volunteer in the next election because i do not consider myself a worthy representative for the people .

there is a difference between the one who votes and the one who does not vote. a person who votes and declares his wishes and steps to achieve them can achieve his goals. in the name of god. greetings and respect to dear listeners and viewers who are interested in the phil majlis program. in this program filmjals service. mr. siamak, we are true the kalimi minority represents the 8th, 9th, and 10th terms of the islamic council, who are doctors and surgeons , as they say, they are licensed knife cutters, and before representing the

parliament, they were the president of a hospital. even now , after they resigned from the parliament and did not participate in the 11th period, they are doing medical work , they have one or two offices, and now i think that we should ask them the first question. seek from the agency. they represent the minority and of course, not now , but they did this for three terms in a row, so i think we should ask mr. mordsadegh what is the fundamental difference between the representatives of the minorities and the ordinary members of the parliament. from the legal point of view, all the members of the parliament have equal rights and duties because after the election becoming a representative is not responsible for one's area , it is responsible for all people. the only difference

may be in the way of election, the representatives of religious minorities do not have a geographical area, their geographical area is all over iran, and the people who follow that religion participate in the elections and vote for them. maybe there is a special point because the populations are usually smaller populations , the minority populations have much better personal knowledge of each other, and voting in these communities is not much influenced by advertisements, it is more influenced by personal knowledge and the history of the person's previous activities. they decide who to actually vote for, but after being elected, all the representatives have a duty to act for the national interests of the iranian people, to help solve the problems of the iranian people, and to oversee legislation, which is the main task of the parliament. usually, the head of the klimian association is chosen as the head of the disease he is a representative, which means he is one of those who pressure him to become a representative

. normally, the person who works as the head of the kilimian association is well known, but the custom is usually that he resigns before he enters the parliament , that is, usually during in history, there have been only limited cases where the president of the kilimian association and the member of parliament are the same, but it is true that usually anyway, the kilimian association is a place where social activists are better known and people will vote for them. personally, i have been racing since i was 14 years old i was involved in social activities. our social activities started from the student section of the kilimian students organization in shiraz, and then step by step you rose to this level . we were born in shiraz, i was born in shiraz , i am also from shiraz. a person eats tension, it means he wants to go. anyway, personal servitude has been like this that my body

eats from this. i started these movements since i was 14 years old and i think it has been very effective in my life. in fact, the participation of social and political institutions gives order to a person's life. punctuality to create contrary to imagination everyone who thinks that a person who engages in cultural and social activities will have less time, not because he gets used to adjusting his time and using his time optimally . he understands his abilities better, and anyway, some of the duties of every person is to help the society and solve the problems of the society, if anyone has problems. because there are many human problems that can never be solved individually and must be solved socially. what do they expect from you ? in fact, it is not limited to crimea. all

the people come to us. in my office, on average , 30% of my clients are muslims, and i follow up on their work. of course, there is one point in iran that i didn't want to talk about now , and that is that sometimes we have a series of expectations from the representative, which is not the basic duty of the representative . the person of the people may be able to make up a percentage of the representative's work as a side job, but unfortunately, sometimes due to expectations. which becomes the main preoccupation of the representative, and then the representative will no longer have the opportunity to study legislation and spend time on supervision. i always tried to establish a balance between these three courses and in this balance, it should be

in such a way that the demands that the people have from each other will be fulfilled, and the problems that actually exist in relation to the parliament will be met, and i will be able to cooperate with them. most of the demands that the people have from me. in the three terms that we were in the parliament, everyone was actually looking for the fact that the problem was unemployment solve their children in some way, we also did whatever we could to help in this regard, but because of the issue of legality, practically , the representative does not do much about employment, unless a certain person actually has relations with a series of private sectors that he can use. take action well , unfortunately, i did not have much contact with the private sector. therefore, in the field of employment, i might not be able to respond to the expectations, but in other fields, anything can be done and people ask me to do it within the framework of the law. unfortunately, sometimes there are a limited number of people who represent

they look at the solution of their problems in an illegal way , that is, they think that a person's representative, if he wants to do something illegal, then he can put pressure on the representatives. in fact, the thing that causes some resistance in some representatives is that it wastes their time, but fortunately, at least among our clients , there were very few such requests that someone asked me for something illegal that is not possible within the framework of the law. that they have personal requests and want their personal issues to be resolved by voting, especially in small and sparsely populated constituencies. it is very common, but i think that after all, kalimiya have the right to have these personal requests because they are really a minority, that is, their number is small, zoroastrians, kalimiya, assyrians , each of them finally has the right to their representative who wants to have more.

i don't agree with your idea. in my opinion, the representatives of religious minorities are no different from the representatives of other representatives . we have a duty to the iranian people. the reason is that the basic problems of the minority communities are no different from the basic problems of the rest of iran. i will find a framework for the whole of iran. naturally , the problem of the secular society will also be solved . there is a very important point that i have always stressed: the fate of religious minorities in iran cannot be separated from the fate of the rest of the iranian people. if saddam attacked iran , the missile would come down. you don't ask me what your religion is, should i eat it or not, whenever there were good conditions in iran, we all used these good conditions together and were successful, so i think that there is a special problem because of being a muslim or a religious minority. being does not exist that there is actually a special need for it because

fortunately, according to our laws , we do not see negative discriminatory processes , although some minorities and we in iran have some points of positive discrimination . if the total number of religious minorities in iran is less than 300,000 people, but they have five representatives. well, this actually shows something else in my opinion. the opinion of the honorable legislator of the constitution is the complete involvement of minority communities in the fate of iran and in the political processes that take place in iran. it can be very successful. i want to give an example about this. during my time as a representative , i participated in the united nations twice, and this time i participated with two presidents who may be very different from each other in terms of political line. me with dr. ahmed. nejad, i went to new york with dr. rouhani, and in both cases, i only thought about one thing

: defending iran's national interests, because when, for example , america is an enemy of the iranian people , it is my enemy, when anyone looks at iran, he looks at us too . this is because the religious minorities in iran are not a series of immigrants or residents we are iranians with different religions. even if you look at the constitution , you will realize that in the constitution of the monarchy , religious minorities were referred to in such a way that kilimians are christians and zoroastrians living in iran, while the constitution of the islamic republic of iranians , kilim iranian zoroastrians and christian iranians is actually a full citizenship, as foreigners say , is defined for minorities according to this law, it may be strange for you to know that during the qajar era , even problems.

i don't believe in anyone working in the private medical sector, i spend most of my time there i was a full-time professor at the kurdistan university of medical sciences, or i was the head of dr. sapir charity hospital. i have been active for about 30 years, and because in my opinion, someone who works in the public sector may have the opportunity to serve those who are not able to do so elsewhere. there is not much service for them , you can actually provide a service. offer it to a larger number of people, of course, those who work are respectable and there is nothing wrong with them

, but my personal interest has always been in the part of your work that takes into account the greater interests of the people , even though i am a surgeon, i emphasize more on there is an adage of a surgeon, the best surgeon is that you don't have to do surgery, and i am exactly in favor of this, because anyway, the less the cost to the people , the less the cost to the system. in fact , the budget of the ministry of health can spend to make it more basic and hygienic, unfortunately, before the revolution, our healthcare system was modeled after the us, and the american healthcare system is a system based on the profit-making system, which means that it seeks to import a series of equipment and a series of drugs . sell ​​it outside and earn from it make money, and finally, this treatment

-oriented system will turn into a system that patients like to be, but a system that was relied on in iran after the revolution, and here i need a person who worked hard here, this time mr. dr. i would like to thank marandi who laid the foundation of primary health care services in iran . he was the first person who did the work of working in our villages when it was not possible to have a doctor. in fact, my claim to the ministry of health and the university of medical sciences and the department of medicine in the ministry of science caused us to no longer need foreign doctors. do not have i myself remember the year 1369 , when i was working in the southern cities, in most of the cities, the majority of our doctors were either indian or bangladeshi. they may not be bad doctors , but they did not have the ability to communicate with us. now, i don't think that there is a place in iran that needs a foreign doctor. well, this is a development

that is really respectable, and for this reason, i think that maybe the main person who had an effect on iran's health care system after the revolution was dr. marandi. even the american government has requested dr. marandi many times for a series of states those who have a low level of health should actually go to get hired and implement the pe system in iran , which of course they do not accept the system . if you have a doctor, you will train a series of people. you know that they can diagnose a series of common diseases early, more important than that, their job is to promote health, for example, it is something like a family doctor in canada, but with a lower level of education because, for example, when the patient goes to the family doctor, he is not ready for vaccination in go to the person's home and do the vaccination. a person will be trained who can do this mentally and

spiritually . insurance is used or misused, which causes waste, and basically they say that insurance companies are a kind of bank based on the so-called. loss-making systems like banking systems are useless systems. i want to say that if we want to have a fair health system, we must have insurance, but the form of our insurance must be completely changed, in no way, anywhere . the world of general insurances, the cost of referring to a specialist

or they don't pay for specialists in the first visit . you have a certain family doctor. yes, it means the universal insurance system that covers almost everyone. you don't agree with it. no, i don't agree with it at all. there are family doctors system, when the family doctors feel that there is a need for a referral to a higher level , the work is done, unfortunately, this does not happen in our country, and this causes both our family doctors and general doctors to not have a very good social position and the desire to all of them are expert expressions both our specialists and subspecialists spend a part of their time on the work that the lower levels of treatment can do, and this may cause even the time for the patients who really need them to be reduced, so we need a the health system for everyone, which starts from the basics, must be based on health, not

on treatment, and pay close attention to the cost benefit . there are many, many advanced medical equipments that may have beautiful names, but they do not solve the problems of the whole people. the cost is the same if health issues the effect it will have is far more than this of course, i can easily say this to you . one of the success factors of the system after the victory of the revolution is undoubtedly health and treatment, no one can deny this . the progress that has been made in this field , the vaccination rate in iran before the revolution was less than 70 , now it is almost 100, at least in rural areas, and this is something that is really the least place in the world to be able

to reach this level of vaccination coverage, and this is all gratifying in when you were a doctor in the 8th, 9th, and 10th parliaments, how long were you? the percentage of doctors in the 6th parliament was 70. in our period, there were at least 50 doctors . of course, there is a lot of discussion about this issue, but i can tell you something convenient. when bashar assad is a doctor, bashar assad is an ophthalmologist, in any case, it does not mean that a doctor cannot be a politician. it should be a good circuit and it can't be done because someone is working as a professional. my view is how they deal with the insurance systems . how did you deal with it? in this case, we gave a detailed plan to the commission and it was approved, but the implementation issue is according to the plan that is currently being completed. in fact, we should

go to the family doctor, to the electronicization of medical information . let's say that if someone else wants to go to the specialized high levels in the first place , he will have to pay for it himself, even pay for my medicines, but anyway, these rules were not fully implemented and were implemented incompletely. there was a law that doctors must either work in the government system the private system has been proven all over the world . it is not very nice for a doctor to be employed both in the government system and in the private system, but due to the reasons of this issue , it has not yet been fully implemented . we ask the representatives , what do you think should have been an important task, and in the end it did not come to a conclusion. in my opinion, there is a fundamental problem in the parliament, that is

, the supervisory aspect of the parliament, at least in these three terms that we were in the size of the legislative aspect was not strong , we passed many laws either incompletely it was implemented, or even some of it did not even reach the implementation stage. well, i think that this problem that existed in the parliament needs to be improved now. the situation of another point was the disproportion of the force that is mentioned in the document and in the commissions. my opinion has always been that the commissions are the place for specialized and expert discussions in the parliaments, but the hours that were actually allocated to the work of the commissions were four hours a week. which was about less than one-fifth to one-sixth of the total time that the representative spent in the parliament in a week , and even the hours that were not considered active hours are too much in my opinion now. of course, what i heard is that the hours of the commissions have changed, they will be changed, and my hours have increased. this is a positive action, but the thing that

actually made the representative angry was the laws that the honorable guardian council would have approved, but you the implementation phase is stopped. another point, in fact, i had a problem with it in the program. it is always that in the programs, sometimes we know that we do not reach the goals we set, and this is not the right thing at all. we have to reduce our programs. it can be measured. let the executives be responsible for that percentage of growth which is determined by the law, if i come and say, for example, in the next 5 years, i want to, i don't know, do something to land an iranian astronaut on the moon, well, this is not possible, but there are many other things in

my mind, there are two things. one is to be able to cooperate in the anti-arrogance movement that existed in the country , especially in a field such as sedition and supporting the system, to be very active in the matter of legislation . what happened was that the theoretical part of the parliament became very active. and he was able to take an intellectual action for the parliament, perhaps the most important law that was passed in this period, the islamic penal code it was approved that maybe it was a very heavy task that the parliament did, more important than that

was actually the approval of the budgets which was done every year and it was done very carefully in the health commission , the most important thing that was done was actually the drafting of it was a public health letter and its rules , some of which have not yet been fully implemented, but theoretically it was a very good law in hebrew. you know, abu, i can pray to the extent of praying, but as speaking or a language that i can read books in, not the majority of verbal iranians, their familiarity with abri language is to that extent, yes, i know it in the same way as the majority. muslims, for example, have a brief knowledge of the arabic language , to the extent of saying prayers and prayers, and this is what i mean in iran. to social affairs and participating in yes, how come you didn't get bored when you left the parliament? i have not read so many books that i calculated that if

i read 8 hours a day from now until i am 80 years old, the book i have in my book will not be read and i have not seen so many good movies. that if i sit and watch movies for 4 hours a day , i will not see all the movies that i like to watch. dear all, she is currently a phd student in genetic engineering and her time is completely filled with scientific work and research activities. some of the representatives said in this program that we feel that a senate is needed now , that is, a senate with long legislative experience. you are in the first stage of the house of commons. after, for example, two terms, they must pass the representation term here in order to be elected to the senate. do you think something like this is necessary anyway? in many countries of the world, in fact, their parliaments are two

-chambered, two-chambered, and many countries have one-chambered parliament. perhaps this is a lot due to the overall structure of the system. if we are looking for a system that is a parliamentary system, usually single parliamentary systems are actually parliamentary and they don't have a parliament, but our system is more of a parliamentary republic system. in such a system, a two-system system can be used , and maybe. maybe since a series of more experienced workers will be in the supreme assembly , i don't know whether it is actually the elites, for example, he got help from them. maybe it will work better for enema laws , but anyway we have to remember that there are two dimensions in every legislation, one is the specialized dimension, which is important, and the other is the acceptance of the people for the specialized dimension

. however, a law, especially the laws that deal with people's daily life and on a broad level , must be approved by the general public. you will not be successful in implementing it, so we must go to this house of commons in fact, we need it to be a reflection of people's thinking in the world. the main role of the parliament is that it becomes a hinge between the government and the people . and regulates this movement . in my opinion, our parliament is also necessary and necessary to the house of commons in order to do this, and because the representatives who are present in the parliament are from the body

of the people and they understand the thoughts of the people, they have direct contact. and they are close to the people, so they can actually be a representative of the collective opinion the collective thoughts of the society so that the government can plan its long-term plans especially based on the people's thoughts, maybe the role of expertise is important in short-term plans, but in long-term plans , the role of general acceptance is just as important as the role of expertise in the case of the constitution. and... the reform that is probably necessary and should be done soon , there are two approaches, one of them says that the prime minister , who may be called the president, but who is elected by the parliament anyway , should replace the current president, that is, the parliamentary republic system. yes, and some others say the opposite, that there should be a senate let's have a two-stage parliament and a republic

means more. leaning towards the republic , what do you think about the structure of iran, the general structure that governs our constitution, in my opinion, the parliamentary system that elects the president or actually the prime minister and the parliament will do more things, but we have a problem here, when you want the system implement a parliament and in fact it will take a completely parliamentary form, the government needs your party, yes, it cannot be done individually, in fact , there will be a series of elections, and then they will choose a president or a prime minister, they will certainly face challenges and it is not easy for them to reach an agreement , secondly, because people alone are not very responsible to the voters or their responsibility is short -term, while the party deals with the people for a long time, and therefore it controls the representatives itself and the people's thinking constantly. it actually

monitors and changes. he quickly informs the parliament. in many parliaments of the world , what i have seen is that even during the voting, only the leaders of the factions are present and the representatives are not present . raised it has not been done in the voting age. if we go in that direction, yes, we must have a durable party organization. unfortunately , there are more than one or two organizations in iran . i can't really call it a rooted party, and yes, if the current structure is supposed to be preserved . the parliamentary system is more open for us. because at that time, when i was in the sixth parliament, i thought a lot about these technical issues of the elections, for example, the elections in tehran.