farsh is the program of mahd farsh stores all over iran tonight. in the name of allah, the merciful, the most merciful, greetings. the secretary of the supreme national security council went to kyrgyzstan to participate in the sixth meeting of secretaries and national security advisers of the countries of the region. this meeting will be held at the invitation of the kyrgyz counterpart on the topic of afghanistan in bishkek, the capital of this country. in this meeting, the most important security and political issues regarding afghanistan and its results and consequences for the region will be discussed and discussed. the islamic republic of iran is the founder of this meeting, which has had two meetings so far.

it was held in tehran. the growth of health tourism in iran the 17th international health tourism exhibition, the deputy director of the ministry of health announced that the number of health tourists in iran this year has exceeded 1 million 500 thousand and a new record has been set. in the field of medicine, iran is one of the most advanced countries in the world, and besides, we do not need to send patients abroad for treatment. there are many countries that send their patients to iran for their medical affairs, there are several reasons, the most important of which is the trust that exists in iranian medicine, in terms of medicine, we are at the edge of knowledge. the second competitive cause it is true that we are more competitive than competing countries in terms of the fees we actually receive for services, and this also creates an incentive . in terms of the country's income generation

, last year we had 1 billion dollars in foreign exchange income from tourist treatment, and this number will increase this year, considering that the number of our tourists has reached half a million people by 1511 , and we believe that we will give an increase of 6 million to 6 billion dollars . by announcing this, he said this recipe due to the progress of health protection and disease prevention technologies, with the aim of facilitating the granting of licenses to businesses related to agriculture , it is revised. preventing the issuing of licenses or activities is based on the recipe that the veterinary medicine organization inherited from half a century ago. in 1350, the legislator obliged the medical animal organization to protect the privacy of animal husbandry. and in

1351, the charter of this article 19 was approved by the council of ministers, but the private sector considers this directive as an obstacle to business, one of the obstacles to production in the country is to observe the distances, which must this law should be abolished and changed, and these issues should be addressed by the ministry of agriculture. at all, we are not saying that all harams are bad, they are very good, but they can be revised. we do not believe in removing all harams, just as we do not believe that all harams should remain, every first step of unnecessary harams must be removed. . within 6 months

to formulate a new directive and after the approval of the cabinet of ministers to issue an executive order, but this directive never reached the meeting of the cabinet of ministers. article 6 of the law of society animal husbandry says that the boundaries between livestock units should be determined by the ministry of agriculture and approved by the cabinet of ministers, which unfortunately did not happen. but after the follow-ups, it seems that new news is coming. we came to the conclusion that based on the beauty and need of the day for some activities , the conditions of technology, technology and even people's culture have caused some activities to be added and deleted , and we should have a review of the distances, god willing, it will be fruitful and the people will benefit from it. medicine is the current recipe, but according to the statistics of the ministry agriculture. the implementation of this order prevented

the issuance of more than 4,400 business licenses . it is related to russia's new nuclear and space capabilities that can target american satellites and disable this country's communication capabilities. the speaker of the house of representatives of the united states invited the people to calm down and said that he will review this issue in a meeting with the white house.

i have seen mr. turner's statement on this matter and i want to assure the american people that there is no cause for public concern. we would like to work together to address this issue. amri announced that a commercial ship was hit by an explosive projectile while sailing east of yemen's aden port. the forces of the yemeni army agreed until the zionist regime does not stop its attacks on gaza. attacks on the ships of this regime or the ships

of the occupied territories will continue in the red sea. the next part of the news at 2 o'clock:

the importance of elections in electing a strong parliament, the key is in the hands of the people, coach. we don't agree that the top is above the sky above wherever we are today.

gas engineering, i am present as an opponent of the nationwide gas supply and the other side of mr. montazer torbati's debate the former ceo of the national gas company and the former deputy minister of oil are present. in addition to salutations to both guests , i would like to start with mr. daftaryan and this question, which is fundamentally opposed to him, and despite the fact that we have done very well and

increased production, there has not been a year in which we should not face the problem of gas supply during the cold periods of the year and we should not have to reduce the gas supply to industry and power plants. from now on, we are in a situation where not only the increase in gas production. we don't have , but we face a significant reduction of gas for years. it means that from now on we don't have gas at all that we want to give even to there we did gas supply. and this trend will increase very alarmingly. that is, now we have calculated that in 1418, if we are optimistic , we can increase consumption from 6% to 3%. let's say the amount of gas we need in the cold four months of the year

is 1500 million cubic meters. if we do nothing , we will make only 200 million cubic meters of gas in 1418. now imagine that we need 1500 million , we have 200 million production if we assume that our conditions should be such that we can have foreign investment or have income from places where we can find undeveloped reservoirs. let's develop it again, our gas amount will reach a maximum of 500 million 55 million cubic meters , which is a third of the gas we need, that is, even you have supplied gas here, we have to cut off their gas , and not only that, the problem of energy supply is such that the country cannot be practically

thank you mr. montazer torbati, what do you think, in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful, i also offer my greetings to the dear viewers. also, mr. daftaryan and his excellency, i would like to welcome you. well, you see , the discussion of gas supply has been a long-term program that over the past years has been our country has taken place basically, after the islamic revolution, the process of the program , in fact, the country's energy supply made some changes , but before that, gas was not a very abundant commodity. gas was formed, and because we had no consumption, we exported the gas to the former soviet union at that time, but later, when the issue of

oil transportation was raised, the sale of oil was raised. gas was considered as an alternative fuel inside the country, and since then almost in all eras and all governments and all parliaments and different thoughts, the issue of gas has been discussed it has been the meeting place of all views, now the reason. what happened? my reason is that you should see that gas is considered as a clean fuel and its pollution is much less than liquid fuels, and vice versa. with liquid fuels, the price is cheaper. therefore, an opportunity is always created for the government as the gas supply is developed. the possibility of exporting liquid fuels such as liquid gas and diesel and kerosene fuels would increase. as a driving force, the parliament

has always sought the development of gas supply because it is a good case anyway. people have been very interested people it is necessary for everyone to be connected to the gas network, and the members of the parliament, with all their thoughts , who actually appear in the parliament, always have as one of the issues they request and the promises they make to the people, the promise of gas supply, and they follow this, so gas consumption in the country has four driving forces: the government because of its economy, the parliament because of its influence. which in fact created the people's view in the discussion , because it actually brings about their well-being, and gas is really good , it is a public welfare, and the whole country because of environmental debates, because it is actually a clean fuel, mr. daftrian, you how much did you agree with this? basically, from the beginning, as you are now, you say that the conditions

are not such that we want to supply gas to the rest that do not have the blessing of gas. the same places where we supplied gas should be cut off , but you said that you are not against nationwide gas supply . it was that we cut the gas in the cold of energy, that is , at the time we are talking about gas at all it was not mentioned.

let's act more economically, but until this is not ready, then let's use this. in the proposal of the so-called studies that we did in 1973 , it was that we bring gas to the energy basket equal to 2 million barrels of oil, so that we can export 2 million barrels of oil. we didn't make suggestions and we didn't act. our oil exports

were cut off from 85 percent, that is, we consumed all our oil ourselves , but since then our plan was to go for wind and solar in the qa'i program . now, in saudi arabia, one kilowatt hour of electricity is 1. 04 cents, the contractor sells to them, that is the contractor himself will produce electricity at four cents , one cent, one cent, and zero cents per kilowatt hour. now in portugal, for example, it is one and a half cents. in other places, it is between one and one and a half cents. in iran , we end up with 15 cents per hour. this is how the economy has become now. we had to lay about 1000 kilometers of telecommunications network in the zhanjiran refinery, which was one of the heads that i ran

. i remember last week from one of these engineers who was the head of that department when asked whether they have had any problems with electricity supply in these 45 years or 40 years, he said no, it means reliable and cheap electricity. we are talking about the reason we are talking about , the main reason is economic. the second reason is that you are now and we are now. in natrazi, we have both gas and electricity. it is much more serious in electricity, mr. montazer tard. you now agree that we should supply gas to the remaining villages and cities or go for other energies. you see , the issue is that the future of gas supply is different from the past, the talk that mr. daftar is making, yes

, the reality is renewable fuels and renewable energy. in fact, now electricity or energy from renewable methods like electricity, like wind or these methods are very nice and nothing about this issue. there is no difference of opinion, the issue of the finished price is for us. i remember that in 2012 , the issue of gas supply was discussed, the continuation of the gas supply process, at that time, the parliament passed a law known as clause 4, and then as article 12. the law on removing obstacles to production became permanent in that law. the work model was an economic model , which means that the parliament or the government did not give any money to the national gas company for gas production, the basis of the work economy.

it was like this , it was supposed to be done if the gas supply was economic. i remember that at that time mr. mendes zanganeh was the minister of oil, he gathered a group, mr. dr. afride was from the parliament, there were different experts and they came to investigate. the same discussion that we have for the rest of the villages and cities, in fact, it is better to provide electricity or other methods. at that time , the calculations that were done, almost the first priority was still with gas in terms of price, then it was even with cng gas in the first place. electricity was placed third, the reason is that in our country, electricity in the way that mr the office says that it cannot be produced now , it cannot be produced by the sun method, it cannot be produced by the wind method. most of our electricity comes from fossil fuels and electricity in our country is expensive , that's why it was prioritized in that review . now, i remember, at that time, the liquid fuel

that we used was on average 50 cents per liter and 55 cents per liter of gas at the best price. the price of a cubic meter is now between 20 cents and 25 cents in different sabbaths for consumption in petrochemicals and for export in other places. you said that the political pressures, for example , the representatives or the government itself, because it was the demand of the people, they supply gas. basically, this is what you said. this means that this work is non-economic and the governments themselves do this because of their popularity or because of pressure, for example, the representatives do this, neither was it the meeting of the representatives , it was also economic. you should do it . yes, you should. now if you see if we have electricity. apart from the electricity that we are producing now , we can talk about it, but if in the current conditions of the country

, we supply fuel with the model that we actually have until now , we will still produce energy in the country. yes, i agree. i would like you to see that when a household uses liquid fuel , it consumes approximately 2500 liters of fuel per year, 200 to 2500 liters depending on the hot and humid regions, and this when using gas. we replace a fuel of 50 cents with a fuel of 20 cents or 55 cents with a fuel of 20 cents , we have 25 cents, we replace practically about 30 to 35 cents , which if we multiply by 2500 , the difference is about 750 dollars per year if i am not mistaken. the consumption of a household is between gas fuel and liquid fuel, which depends on you. he has given permission that if investment comes, you can do it yourself as an investor, the gas company can do this, it can sell this alternative fuel . i remember at that time, in fact

, the government allowed us to take this fuel difference for the cost of gas supply for 3 years, now with those prices, if we want to calculate it. i remember at the time, each branch was up to 10 million tomans, then it was up to 15 million tomans , now with the current prices of each essay. it has an investment cost. after 3 years, the difference in the price of two fuels is still justified, unless it is far from 100, i.e. the village, and it becomes more expensive, then we should replace the second methods. we do, mr. daftari, you agree, no, don't look at all, the comparison they are saying is completely correct, we now have our electricity in a very different way. i said that in 1373 we insisted on a management for the country's energy. there should be a structure

in order to deal with mismanagement in electricity production and production even in oil. we have a lot of problems in oil now, so to speak, we have problems in our common reservoirs everywhere. in other words, no, basically, what i am saying now is it cost-effective for us to supply gas, and we do not accept this see with the comparison that mr. torbati is talking about, they are right, we are raising a new debate, see, now i am saying that we are producing electricity uneconomically, we are wasting almost two thirds of the energy on reforming. for production, the reason is that the economy of gas is higher there, but if we produce electricity for one cent instead of 15 cents , electricity will be much cheaper there. and if

we make a tradition, something that is being done will be done . i am telling you that portugal, saudi arabia , dubai are not one or two countries. i wish i had a diagram. i was showing you here . you would have wondered why we are here. when you see us, our country is a very special country. we have all the resources. we rank first in the world in terms of oil and gas, but our situation in electricity is much better than that. we head we have places where we can use the sun for 300 days a year, and the so-called economic amount that we have in the sun is much better than our oil and gas, and it is practical to see. for example, let me ask mr. muntarez tolliti about this. they say that it is possible to produce electricity more cheaply he replaced it. look, yes, many times, when i was in charge, in various meetings, this question

is also raised by the people. is it basically the right thing for us to take gas to people's houses or to take electricity to people's houses? well, this has been discussed, see in countries where electricity is the main energy in people's houses or as the main energy for heating and in fact supply. energy is used because their electricity production model is different, those countries that produce electricity from water produce it from wind. they use nuclear power, yes, and it is better to use electricity there, but in our country, we have to we would like to see that today, instead of this amount of gas supply, we now consume 117 billion cubic meters of gas in our domestic, commercial and small industries, which mainly use heating . people are going with

the same technology of existing heaters with the same existing systems, anyway , it is about 65% and higher, it is about 65, but our power plants have an efficiency of 40% at best . in my opinion, it is not correct to repeat the comparison that we made in the circumstances we have inventory, which means we are producing electricity with very low efficiency. look at us now.

if we come to cooperate with china and in iran , as i say, it is practical. see if we supply gas to the people or not. it is a debate that we base the future of the country's energy on what is actually the raw material.