that the number of employees is right, that now , if we want to have a meeting, we can talk about the pathology of these idiots, this should be corrected. let's apply it to the labor sector , regardless of whether we believe that the increase in workers' salaries for the lower classes should be more, that is, the logic of the descending staircase logic, which now i think is not much of a difference, that is , i think they also agree, but the part where i say the increase what is my goal? i mean we are we can apply the increase to everyone , one is no, let's analyze the household basket, for example, employees, workers , what are the cost items that are related to, for example , the second part of article 41, one of the most important of them is the right to housing. we can purposefully determine the right to housing according to the cost of housing in a regional manner . what does this mean? it means that this increase and

surplus should be increased at least . let's not look at each other to see who is lagging behind in my opinion, the budget is one of the best opportunities. in the next part, i would like to thank you for paying attention to the limits of spending credits and the problems that failure to pay attention to this issue can cause in the country. i will say

during the year, the government should consider any increase in any level for government employees and salary earners who receive salaries from the budget . employees have given , you are now going with different examples this has been added, that has been added throughout the year , these donations have come, we have also seen your documents, we are not satisfied with your statements.

you see, dear mr. shahraei, there is a difference of opinion between me and you . i told you that you see a purely economic problem, i am looking at it from the society's point of view . when you talk about the percentage, the number 57 may tempt you very much. in the world of economics, 57 is a very large number. it's big, but in the society with the atrocities that happened, the amount of 1 million 500 thousand tomans is not a number at all. 1 million 500 thousand tomans does not cover even one of the household expenses. we have we are talking about the realities of society. today, the cost of livelihood, which was imposed on us last year in the supreme labor council by the influence of the government without expert opinion, is 13 million 90 thousand tomans. the minimum wage of a worker is 5,700,000 tomans with the additional income you say is 7,200,000,000, and since this year, the wage increase of 1,400. we considered 3. it was said that

it is reaching 10 million tomans, while the minimum living expenses for 1402 were above 15 million tomans . no, but if we don't see where we are, we cannot see where we want to go. this is the reality of our society today. you say that the government cannot keep some specialties in the government body. i say, unfortunately, with our policies , we can't do it anymore in the country. you say politics. the whole of the country, the family support policy and the increase in the population of our center, what research has been done so far, how much does the increase in prosperity affect childbearing , and one of the main reasons is that today our childbearing is going in a negative direction. is there anything else ? it is from this livelihood situation that we are let's purposefully go to a certain area, just from

the point of view that you are looking at the issue , let's take a corner and say to ourselves, i am talking about the economy and justice, that's all i have to do . explain that you should first separate the justice you are doing for the government employees with the private sector salaries that do not have those benefits. today , our government employees have a job security. i will give you an example. they use it in different places, this is the smallest difference between government employees. private sector private sector worker with a monthly contract of one month for two months , he is not able to use even the facilities that you are considering. with these differences, if you want to apply the same formula for all of these, we will be condemned to the same events that have happened to us until today. today

, our private sector is no longer able to recruiting labor force is not production. today, bringing our technical workers to false jobs, because we determine the minimum wage that we have, on the one hand, it destroys the power of competition. it means that anyone who wants to follow the law cannot pay higher wages in competition with other colleagues, and cannot lower the price to that price. it should be finished at the price that is reasonable . on the one hand, it is not able to raise the wages. on the other hand , the workers are not willing to come to work in the environment . our production department is being destroyed. you have noticed this point so far that the wages that we have are determined. it becomes the purchasing power of the society, and practically , this increase can be our economic driver for the prosperity of production. we know the relationship between recession and inflation, with the increase in inflation that we have established in a country and the suppression of the production components, you must know the components of the finished price, we are in the price. we have run out of raw materials , it is effective, there are many overhead costs, one of them is the salary, the salary

is included in the total price of our goods and services , it has an impact of less than 10% on all businesses. the employer brings nothing and the added value produced is only the art of that person, he has the right to take the largest share of the added value created . we have set the burden of reducing consumption and reducing it from above production and increased overhead costs. we have a single price on production, we are creating inflation in secret, but from this we want to reach the minimum level , we want to solve all the problems of the country, the so-called lack of justice in the discussion of investment and infrastructure, the lack of justice in wages and all.

we want to solve the country's problems at least. these problems are in other areas. we should go to that area and pay wages with its effects . wages have an impact on society. to an insignificant effect in the field of economy, if we want to see only economics and want justice only let's put it bluntly, i believe it's a mistake, and i would like to mention one thing. first of all , i am present in this meeting as a representative of workers and retirees in the field of social security , and i am also a representative of all salary earners, but considering that the majority of our audience is these are the people, please let's take the discussion to this area. you said that it wasn't 10% , it was 4%. you said that the 57th salary

of a worker is also free for them. well, if this is not said here in the media, where should it be said that these differences should not be explained, that is, now. what i have is what you said, for example, 5 and 300 is not 5 and 300. it is 5 and 300 there is one item that i have to pay. well, 90 tomans is 100. how much is 7.300 ? according to the official statistics of the country, one share is one share for a child, that is, 3 shares of a household are one share. the children's right of birth, which is currently the labor law, is approximately 530,000 tomans, with this family dimension

, it is approximately 8 tomans. well, we are talking about the national media here, so as not to create a perception , for example, we pay someone 5,300. the law says that with the family dimension. one share averages 8 tomans, well, this is low, it is definitely low, but explain the introduction, the analysis, the introduction , what is the prescription in the employees now that we are together we are talking about the minimum sentence, in fact, the minimum sentence of government employees and the monthly contract is approximately 7920. well, when i said this , there are children in it , so what is the amount of children ? in the future, i said that for one person who is subject to it and there should be 2, i don't want to go into too much detail. i am talking about the general question. my question is, why do you say that

salaries should be increased according to inflation and in fact within the limits of spending credits? while mr. khodayi says that they should increase not only in line with inflation but also beyond inflation , i had two main reasons. the first reason was that we should increase in a targeted manner so that justice in the country is respected. for example, my right is living in tehran , he has the right to housing, someone who is in a far away city, both of them are equal in terms of work dignity, but their living expenses are different, we should not make them all the same because it will put pressure on the employer , he is actually in the city. there are some costs in tehran, that is, you say that we are proportional to the ax and now inflation is a point inflation, in fact , we can do this increase in different cities, different places, and one year, it may be more than inflation . well , what is the logic of my argument ? in order not to be misunderstood, i say that if

there is a hardship in the country, there is an economic pressure , this should be explained in a balanced way. if there is welfare , it should be balanced. a few weeks ago , i was at your service in the same program regarding the salary cap. if you remember , we were there. we strongly believed and explained that the salary ceiling should remain, but now it is i don't want to get into that topic because the basis is this , that is, this is the starting point of our discussions , there is a rosary thread. he says, "why does he want to run away from the bottom with comforts and material, so excuse me, this is an important part of my speech, so what is the thread of the rosary, the logic that we are supporting, if i give my personal opinion about the 18 that the government it was mentioned in the bill, i believe it should be more than 18, because i believe that in the current situation, the increase in the rights that the society has means the pressure that the economy is bringing to the society, this increase. the logic is

that we do not oppress a certain class, nor do we oppress a certain class let's pay a limit, so this was my first argument when i said that we should target the increases , make them proportionate, why should we make them proportionate, because the government and the sovereign are responsible for all classes, not the negative, how will the inflation be. it means that this is the same targeted increase . does it include the inflation rate? definitely , definitely. what are we talking about? it is proportionate to the inflation within the limits of the financial credits, that is, the limits that come, that is , because the government is facing a budget deficit and

in providing for the salaries of the employees. he is in trouble. because of this, when we reach the end of the year, we have a year of fluctuation from the stock market to the government in the past, once we play with the supply rate , once we do something in another way to cover that budget deficit, and with the policies we do to compensate for our budget deficit, it leads to the creation of an ax. this is not directly related to my salary. from the next method of determining our budget, from the next method of our income, which the conditions are not available , i would like to tell you, look, i am telling you that the main part of us that does not receive any funding from the government is the social security organization, whose inputs are its own insurance premiums, by the way. we are doing injustice in the social security organization, sir a person has paid an arial insurance premium during his service period, and now he has the right to receive an arial pension

. what does the insurance law of justice mean? can we come to the people's budget and say it is fair? we don't want to do this. in the field of the social security organization, the establishment of labor rights makes no sense at all. they don't use my public budget. the government doesn't even pay my treatment per capita to the social security from its own budget. these arguments of yours can be discussed in the field of government employees, but in the entire field of our salaried society is not debatable, and by the way , if this budget reduction is production, i am one of the differences with the rest of the gentlemen , i live in production from morning to night. look, when we define our major industries, most of our industries are currently operating with less than 50% of their capacity according to the statistics of the ministry of industry, because we have a decrease in demand for it . on the side of reducing the demand for essential items, see the discussion of supply and demand in economics. it is a well-known debate that we say that if the demand for currency increases

, the supply will be low and it will cause inflation, mr. doctor. allow me to try to sum it up . introduction. if the demand is more than the supply, yes, it leads to inflation, but when 50% of the capacity of your factories are empty, and due to inflation , they are supplying the capital at the full price. in this situation , there is no question of increasing power being inflationary . we are talking about sanctions and the problems that exist in the way of exports for our country , which is the main consumption market. our producers are inside our country, and from onur, i emphasize again , don't ignore the social issue. today, this per capita reduction in the consumption of essential household items will impose disease on our health system in the coming years. did today, the lack of household income and not being able to spend on mental health , entertainment, and education is the same as the high rate

of divorce that is destroying the society. just wanting to go economic is a flag word. let's take justice in our hands, which is a very beautiful word. we all fight for justice, but let's take the flag of justice. let's ignore what's wrong with this so-called wage suppression, with this freezing of hands . looking around a lot . yes, now i am the first part of the argument and in the parts in the past, i explained the second part, which is about the limits of spending credits, now i will talk a little about it. in the government department , i would like to collect some numbers so that the audience can keep in mind more. in fact, the public expenses of our country are budget 402, approximately 1,500,000 billion tomans, and you have approximately 375,000 billion tomans of capital . we have 200,000 billion tomans of financial medicine, the simple meaning of which is that it

is a financial settlement, that is, a financial development budget, which means that we will make a loan for the compensation of the employees from these credits. the main part is related to this cost and unavoidable costs, that is, the government that is responsible for providing services to the society, in fact, the majority of the public costs that it incurs are related to actually providing the salaries of its employees. we can deal with this issue in several layers. a layer of discussion that in fact, the fair pressure should be explained, the welfare should be explained in a fair way, we can look for it this year, which we said with that logic that this should be more, but it has become more with the following that is wonderful. what was added, but another discussion is that if we want let's manage our public

expenses, when most of the expenses are related to this sector, and these expenses, if they are less, because on the one hand, this part was expenses, in the resource part, we also have an income, which is mainly about taxes and customs duties . we have capital trading, which is the sale of oil and inam. in fact, our income with our expenses almost creates a negative operating balance of 45 thousand billion tomans. if we want to manage this, i emphasize, i emphasize that one of the tools we can use is to control the growth of salary expenses, but why me? i am stressing that it is one of these tools because i have logic to prescribe a salary increase this year, for example, 1%, because

we believe that our respected retirees have their rights from the soft society . it is a correct decision that we take something from a source that the general society is involved in and give it to a group that is actually a little behind. they may even be unemployed, which means they don't have a job at all , they are on welfare, they are on the relief committee or workers get a minimum wage of 1% excess tax for added value and give it to retirees. this is justice. what is your opinion? we are not just about justice. i want to understand your perception of justice

. i want to understand this tax. and that's it. justice , look. i think we should not lose sight of the main point of the debate. i beg you, if you answer this question, i promise to remain silent until the end of the debate. you should give a speech.

it was a look, it was a look that fit a look it was that at least we believed in a proportional approach . proportional does not mean that the employees are being oppressed. the reason for this was that the increases that we are considering are more in a year when our capacity is more, and less in a year when our capacity is less. where did we actually get to? if we have this comprehensive view, in the logic that i spoke many times in the meeting and i don't want to repeat it, that balanced prosperity should be explained, balanced hardship should be explained , sorry, this is an important part. the logic is that we come to calculate and say that, for example, allowances the welfare of the relief committee increased by, for example, 30%. well , in the past years, it increased more than this

. for example, we have to look at all classes . in the last few years, someone protested four times, not because it prevented inflation, why didn't we protest and approve and support because we believed that the scene of different sections of society

took place in order to make the discussion more open, i tried to speak more frankly that god willing, our society make sure that his speech will be said i would like to thank you for the fact that the issue of inflation is a matter of historical record . over many years, if

you look at the rate of wage increase next to the inflation of the current year, it will be proven to you that there is no significant relationship between the increase in wages and inflation, even if if we want to abuse the statistics, like some people, we can say that this is the opposite result. in the years when we had a higher wage increase, we had lower inflation in the following years , but we believe that there is no significant relationship , it is not that it caused this issue , and in the discussion of the month i believe that the law should be followed let's do it in article 167 of our labor law. and the members of the supreme labor council are clearly specified , apart from the labor and employer members and the head of the council, who is mr. minister of labor. even in our meetings, the weight of the economic aspect of wages is more prominent than the social one

. whatever we are today. we are higher tomorrow. specialists of a knowledge-based company succeeding all kinds to produce orthopedic and surgical drills and saws , which are used in orthopedic applications, neurosurgery, open heart surgery, and other surgical cases. these products are against humidity and nose. they are resistant and

can be sterilized by steam and pressure or in an autoclave machine in the shortest time. these science-based products are a good alternative to imported ones, which solve the problems of lack of supplies and providing after-sales services. the final stages of the construction of tolo 3 nahid telecommunication satellites. two were completed by experts in the country's space industry. these two native satellites to do their missions are on the launch pad and will soon be in orbit. it was on 18th of february last year that we witnessed the unveiling of tolo 3 nahid 2 satellites. tolo satellite 3 measuring satellites weighing 150 kg. ordered by iran space organization.