mutlaq wants it because usually the elections are extended to the second round and they form coalitions in the long term, they move towards two parties, that is, one of the factors that determine the country's party system , their electoral system. i understand, i just think there is another report. my colleagues are ready to see this report. we will come back and continue the discussion. we are at your service. this is the first period of parliamentary elections, where radio and television are the basis of election campaigns. 200 local networks have been established so that both candidates can get their words out to the public more cheaply the competition will be more fair and people will know the candidates more easily. in addition, in various election programs, including candidate introduction programs and debates, common issues have been seen, which are people's issues. from subsidy from the basic to the elimination

of entrance exams, the issue of hijab, the damage of cyberspace, car imports and plane gasoline subsidies, and now in this debate we will discuss the issue of how to elect the president. the issue that was asked to the election candidates like this. should the people choose the president or the parliament? it should definitely be chosen by the people. people? definitely people. the amount of people's votes. to the opinion i died. elect the president because this is closer to the concept of a republic. our revolution is a people's revolution. of course, the election of the president should be done by the people. people? definitely people. definitely people. people. should the people choose the president or the parliament? considering that parliament representatives are also elected by the people, we must pay attention to the fact that the person who enters the parliament. it is true that

he entered the parliament with the votes of some people, but some people voted for a different idea and their candidate did not enter the parliament, so the logic is that the president of our country should be directly elected by the people themselves. an issue as important as this, the people must decide , the people must choose, yes, naturally, the people, according to the constitution, must be the people, because the word president means the people, the president , i also mentioned the people in the introduction. we also asked the leadership of the islamic shura majlis , and you saw the answers of some of them in this report. if you allow us to go back to mr. shahzadeh, mr. shahzadeh , do you think that in the elections, if the system

is now parliamentary-oriented or semi-presidential, it is a bit populist or now the people? minority and elitism they are elected and those elites actually now choose the prime minister or the president, and in fact, sometimes riding on the waves and playing with people's emotions to get fewer votes , do you agree with this statement or not ? i completely disagree. see, populism is nothing at all. it has nothing to do with the presidential and parliamentary elections. right now , you can see the parliamentary elections in the cities. you can see that tools are being used that are very silly and light, and we don't have such tricks in

the presidential elections, that is, if we want to compare, and the next issue is that we have 8,500 representatives in the 11th period he has voted, so this gentleman or lady should come and sit in the parliament, then they want to elect the prime minister , let's assume that with his vote, it means half and half, then a person who has 850 votes in the whole country, see this is the root of democracy. i say that his vote should be decisive. the prime minister should choose where is the democracy, mr. doctor, the fate of those presidents who vote. how many millions

of people got elected, where did the destiny come from? i'll explain, i'll explain , so it's not that, you see, it's not rooted in the fact that you choose a parliamentary regime. reach the desired destination either presidential or semi-presidential regime choose a presidency and now let's not get into the quality that you said. in fact, people who are symbols of the nation's political will, one is removed, the other is of what quality, and the other is disqualified today . what i have said is something else. what i have is that you are a parliamentary issue at all. and being the president is not a parliament worthy in my opinion. especially because if there are real parties in the society, these parties can represent. what does a representative mean? a representative means a representative of society. a representative means someone who can reflect the voice of the nation. why did the late

founder say that the nation's house? the nation's house means if i turn on this radio farhang , i feel that the representative who is sitting in the parliament is my voice. which representative is my voice? now , the videos that are going viral of the representatives' speeches are funny. in fact, it is your own speech defect, that is, you say that the parliament in fact, there is a point about bush, not this parliament. anyway, we are not talking about this parliament. we are having a theoretical discussion about the political system. let me give you an explanation. it is unfortunate that they say that all presidents have been removed and all are imprisoned. and these are the games of virtual space, which president are you now? look at our prison now, the biggest freeway in our capital is named after one of the presidents of the esteemed republic, who many people think had an angle with, for example, the supreme leader, and this

was not and is not at all like that. the presidents are now doing their jobs and living. actually, the member of the recognition assembly, and in relation to the main discussion, i would like to talk about the issue. well, you see, another reason why i prefer the presidential system and the current system is the issue

of political stability and management stability. the bar is moving every 8 years, you can see the instability in management, how much is too much? it means that a manager comes to learn the work and get to know the details of the work . the next government comes and says, well, you are not from our side, you should go with us. our goal is not to advertise. our goal is to work for the people . let me just remind you about my delivery. i think it will be about a minute until the end of the program. the constitutional system was established in iran until 1990.

we changed 23 prime ministers in 5 years. the parliamentary system was the same during the pahlavi period . well, it means the middleman of every prime minister he has only ruled for a few months, now let's go back to the parliamentary system, then every time 10 to 15 representatives want to change the prime ministership. again, ask all the managers from the minister to the head of the education department of a city to change them. then who wants to change them? to serve the people. after summarizing your speech, it is because it creates political stability and then people's participation in the elections.

to come out as long as some of you feel that they must win and lose in society because of this feeling that they are not seen and are excluded. you say parliamentary, say semi-parliamentary, say presidential they all know that the date of the election is this week and that week. the point is that you should live in a harmonious society where people feel a sense of belonging. may god have mercy on his grave and let light fall on his grave . mr. mohtashmipour , with whom i worked, told me one day that a certain person in the youth committee of students supporting palestine of the islamic council said, "let's make a decision for the people , create a sense of belonging. we need to get rid of this situation in our society today. the country only belongs to the hizbullah group and everyone can enter leg. thank you for following the discussion until the end

. i think it was a good discussion. now, if some people's names are mentioned, according to the national media law, they will be given the right to answer .

hello, ladies and gentlemen, i am alireza hashemzadegan with the world today. in tonight's program , we will broadcast the documentary araba ankabut, which examines the dimensions of the destruction of the merkava tanks of the zionist regime. 14th war against gaza and palestine we present it to you according to the picture. hasbna allah

and the favor of al-wakil .

marah kam umrah of two months, we are in the city, and the message of god is the doctor , wahdah, god is the only one. asthedwa by god.

as i said at the beginning of the program, tonight we are going to discuss one of the less discussed aspects of the gaza war, which is related to how. destruction of merkava advanced tanks by resistance forces. in this we are hosting mr. seyyed mohsen hosseini from the defense group of sada vasima news agency, who is the director and author of the documentary arabeh ankabote, mr. hosseini . hello, welcome to today's youth. greetings to you and dear viewers. an interesting point in the news of this war since the beginning of al-aqsa storm that we have every day. we were on their side. perhaps there was hardly a day when we did not hear

that resistance fighters inside gaza , as well as hezbollah resistance , were hunting merkava tanks. you prepared a documentary about this. why did you choose this subject? in the name of god. generally. well, the diet zionists have technology and equipment. he does not issue these and keeps them exclusively with himself . because it somehow remains its strong point , that is. or the merkava tank , well, there have been talks about not exporting these two anywhere , but none of them have been implemented so far. well, we in the defense group of sed and sima news agency

have been monitoring the battlefield since the beginning of al-aqsa storm operation until today. in the meantime, well. the pictures that were published more than other pictures were the destruction of merkava tanks. well, the destruction of the tanks that the regime and the rafael company had advertised about for years the system that was built for this tank is a system that is for active protection, that the security of this tank is maintained more, the safety of its passengers and finally. this multi-million dollar tank should be preserved for them because the tank is now equipped with a system that can detect any projectile that comes towards it with four radars around it in the form of 360 degree coverage and finally detect and identify each projectile. oh, ignore it

. well, we saw that in the middle of the war and in the middle of the operation days. it wasn't there. well, you see , he had advertised a lot for this system. just today, at the beginning of the world, today there are new images of integration we saw these tanks, yes, yes, even this was sold and exported to big countries, well , it was one of the wonders, really, and it was interesting for us. this great defeat of the zionists in the battlefield is how the resistance fighters were able to pass through this defense system installed for the tank and target the tanks . yes, we spent a few months on this issue and on the tactics used by the resistance forces , both palestinian and lebanese, to pass and deceive payment system. thank you, mr. hosseini. well, we

want to present this documentary to you in a special way tonight in the world today. we will talk more about the spider chariot documentary . this is a merkava tank. armor of 65 thousand kilos. who decided to build it in the middle of the year. was taken the merkava project

had opponents within the zionist regime due to its high costs. but supporters believed that merkava was a development in the field of tanks. will be and will be known as the technology symbol of this regime in the world. אמריקאים לישראלים, america offered to sell its abrams tank to us gave but the minister of defense and israel tal, one of the top commanders of the army, rejected this proposal. it was in 1979 that the first version of merkava was made and entered the army. in the following years, after the construction

of versions 2 and 3, it was time for the fourth version, which was built in 2004. according to the announcement of the military industry of the zionist regime, the fourth version is equipped with anti-tank systems. musk, radars, advanced thermal sensors and laser warning system. but less than two years later, in 2006. the first battlefield to test the fourth version of the merkava has begun. along with other versions. these pictures are related to the 33-day war. tanks that the creators of it as ara. they reminded the gods that they are moving towards the borders of lebanon. according to published information, in the

first days, 50 merkavas were targeted by hezbollah. hezbollah is waiting. he knew exactly how to hit them. they knew exactly where the tank's vulnerable points were. we lost a lot of military tanks in that war. the war ended and the review of the performance of merkavas began.

efforts to increase the ability of merkavas continued until a year later in 2007, the rafael company provided a new system for this tank. it is called active protection. 3 years later , in 2011, the first one was installed and operational on the fourth version of merkava. a system called trophy, which according to the manufacturer of t, four radars

are placed on the four sides of the tank's turret. their job is to discover and track targets in 360 degrees. the radars transmit the information of each projectile that comes towards the tank to the central computer in a systematic manner so that calculations can be made regarding time and angle. next, two launchers on each side of the tank throw sashem-like bullets towards the target projectile and destroy it. as announced

trophy is able to engage with anti-particle rockets, guided missiles and projectiles from other tomics. in 2014, the system was tested on the battlefield for the first time during the invasion of gaza, and according to the zionists, the performance was not acceptable. it protects our soldiers, so far all the projectiles that

came towards us were destroyed. this is the system that was used in the last military operation in gaza. we spent more than 15 years developing this system. after the invasion of gaza in 2014 , the evidence showed that the system protected merkab. has had a successful performance and that is what is available america should buy and install abrams tanks. we chose the troop system, which is probably

the most complete

job of equipping the 4th version of the merkava and a variety of personnel carriers, including an armored car. it arrived and at the end of it, the storm and lakhsa operations began. in the middle of the operation, however, pictures of

the dismemberment of merkaba were published one after another. they were targeted by the palestinian and lebanese resistance forces and were removed from the battlefield. allahu akbar! where the trophy system was active with 360 degree protection, like this merkava, which

was targeted by hezbollah from both sides. according to the information at the time of introduction a trophy was published. this system could be armed again after 75 hundredths of a second after engaging with the first projectile and engaged with the next projectile , but a little earlier in august 1402, hezbollah had unveiled a system called sar allah, which said it would be able to shoot two missiles in less than one second, that is, with a time interval of four tenths of a second, and this means that the trophy system does not have the necessary time to arm itself and deal with the second missile after the collision with the first missile.