respecting consumer rights and maintaining quality is the key to avand's longevity. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. at the same time as the birth of hazrat mahdi, may allah bless him and grant him peace, people decorated their streets and neighborhoods and lit up lights . midnight celebrations are done with the participation of citizens in beautifying the neighborhood and giving identity to the urban space. yari is your representative, bring, bring, bring, a head of yours.

all the people finally pass by and know that it is finally another big celebration, the decoration of the new sadd roof and the foundation of all these arrangements from two months ago.

let us all get rid of this oppression in the world our hope is in you, most places in the world are oppressors, you must come, turn all this into justice , let the imam of time come, solve the problems , solve one of these troubles and these. ya mehdi allaham

ajlik al faraj fatemeh hanar and sada and simaya news agency, the activists of a knowledge-based company in mashhad science and technology park designed and produced a new generation of multiphase pumps. these pumps are used in various industries such as the food, oil, gas and petrochemical industries. this is one of the 750 oil wells in the country that needs to be revived. these 750 wells are less productive, about 19 % of all oil wells in the country. to pull out the black gold of these wells requires special pumps with high technology. these pumps are used in various industries to transfer sticky materials, materials that have solid particles or gas bubbles. multiphase pumps

used to transfer crude oil from oil wells. the use of these pumps reduces the cost and increases the efficiency of these wells. pumps , which before this foreign version were placed at the wells, and now the elites of a knowledge-based company in mashhad succeeded in producing them. we are a manufacturer of positive displacement pumps. our pumps are used in various industries. in the oil and gas industry and petrochemicals are made according to ip 676 standards , in the general industry they are made according to iso requirements, and in the food and health medicine industry , e and gmp requirements are considered for them . to neighboring countries such as afghanistan, iraq, persian gulf countries, and

technologically, this company spends one million euros annually , according to the officials of danesh basian company , it has horizontal products for the country, morteza yaqoubi azizi. the palestinian resistance in an ambush against the forces of the zionist regime in khanyounos destroyed a merkava tank tandem rockets destroyed a merkava tank with yassin 15 rockets in zaytoun neighborhood of gaza city . it has been almost 5 months since the al-aqsa storm operation , and in most of those days, pictures of the destruction of zionist tanks are published one after the other. merkavas that

were targeted by a variety of rocket launchers, explosive bombs and quadcopters. these tanks are equipped with anti-missile systems, radars and advanced thermal sensors. active protection system by your side. in order to increase the security factor of the tank and its occupants, a system called trophy with cover 360 degrees and with the help of four radars , it detects and intercepts any projectile that comes towards the tank . the trophy is one of the latest technologies made by the zionists, designed by raphael. which now shows the release of images from the beginning of the volga storm operation until now. the resistance forces have discovered tactics to deceive this system, bypass it and destroy the tanks. seyyed mohsen hosseini, sed and broadcasting news agency.

in the beginning of this month, the international court of justice listened to the arguments of more than 50 countries about the situation and the issue of palestine. the proceedings of this court will continue until monday. this is a crisis of many it prompted the countries to ask the hague international court of justice to declare the occupation of gaza illegal by the zionist regime. the palestinian people only want to respect their rights . they want nothing more. and they do not accept less than this. this court can become the basis for the future of peace and justice. why israel always escapes from punishment. what is happening in gaza

is the result of 75 years of israeli occupation in palestinian territories. in his speech in the hague, the representative of china expressed beijing's support for the cause of the palestinian nation. and the need to reclaim the legal rights of this nation, he said: the nation palestine is fighting to determine its own destiny and to form its own country, and according to international charters, this is a legal right. the representative of russia also criticized the crimes of the zionist regime against the palestinians and considered the establishment of a single palestinian state as the best way to establish peace. the actions of the us and its allies hinder peace efforts. in gaza and supporting one side against the other side. in the meantime, diego colasas, the representative of france, once again emphasized his country's permanent support for the agreed solution between the two countries . we believe that it is only through the political solution of forming two countries that can have rights at the same time

israelis to enjoy security, as well as the legitimate demands of the palestinians to have an independent, reliable, safe and peaceful country. america, which has repeatedly supported the zionist regime in the gaza war , had this kind of ally attitude in the hague court. there should not be a decree for the immediate withdrawal of israel from the occupied palestinian territories. any move towards israel's withdrawal from the west bank and gaza requires consideration of israel's real security needs. international court of justice at the beginning of the month. he listened to the arguments of more than 50 countries about the situation and the issue of palestine. the proceedings of this court will continue until monday . sanaza kahini of the radio and television news agency. stay with us.

the importance of elections in electing a strong parliament is the key. it is in the hands of the people. iranian coach sharaf iran is playing with the whole country. why are you setting prices in these six months? your question is an interesting question . we do not want to be a football manager. .

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, i offer greetings, courtesy and respect to you, dear viewers , dear compatriots , we are at your service with another higher program. i want to congratulate. in recent weeks, the leader of the islamic revolution called the competition one of the main pillars of the election, and in explaining this , he said that all political, economic, and cultural tendencies with every theoretical point of view are actively involved in the competition. participate in the elections and compete together in this arena. from the very beginning, sed and sima

have tried to strengthen this competition and in order to introduce different viewpoints, currents and trends, to organize debates in this field, which will be presented to you in the form of a higher program from time to time. of course, these propositions in the program above the debate has been posted as a question to the candidates of the islamic council elections, and their answers will be presented to you in their promotional videos that will be broadcasted on two channels. but one of the topics that enters the political discourse of our country from time to time and is discussed is the political system and its change in our country. in the sense that some people believe that the political system of our country should be the same. which currently exists is known as a presidential system in which the people directly elect the president and

the president is responsible for forming the cabinet and the government. it is possible and it performs the duties assigned to the executive branch , but on the other hand , there is another point of view called semi-presidential or parliamentary or parliament-centered in this system . tons of experts are debating whether the people should elect the president or the members of parliament, the prime minister. well, at the very beginning , i would like to introduce the distinguished guests of tonight's program to you. mr. dr. mahdi mahdavi zayed, university lecturer, you are very welcome. . and mr. dr. hossein sheikhzadeh, a member of hitalami

mr. sheikhzadeh university, please tell me why you should actually defend your presidential system, i think you are supposed to defend the presidential system in this program, why are you defending and what are the advantages of this system in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. and i would like to congratulate the happy birth of mr. imam zaman to the honorable nation of islamic iran . i would like to make some corrections. you see , i know the current system as a semi-presidential and semi-parliamentary system, because a pure presidency is something similar to, for example, the political system of the united states of america, and it is a model. in fact, it is the main and outstanding example of the system england, yes, we

are currently implementing something similar to france, which is in between, and they call it a different system . i am a defender of the current system because, first of all, the current system is closer to democracy, because at least once more people go to the polls. middle means in quantitative terms presidential system or even different from democracy. it is closer because we have four elections in the islamic republic now and there is almost no military in the world that has this number of references to the people directly, this is the first position of the current system that we have, but the second position is that we

the content of the presidential system is more democratic. and people know more every year, in addition to that, because you have mentioned that the current democratic systems are indirect systems , that is, indirect democracy. there, in athens and sparta , all the citizens would gather in the main square of the city at the end of the week and decide on the basic issues of the city government, although that system also had some problems because the citizen was a free, wise adult man of greek origin, i.e. five group

they were excluded, which included women, children, people who, in terms of it is logical to have immigrants and slaves, but in any case, the same number of people who remain under the title of citizens, they directly make decisions for themselves, for their country, for their society . it is true. again, democracy was revived, no longer going to direct democracy because the topics had become specialized, the population was large. and therefore it was not possible to implement that direct democracy. well, today's democracies themselves are indirect. then we if if we want to run a parliament , it becomes more indirect. it means that, for example, among people. they elect a member of parliament, then the member of parliament comes and chooses the prime minister. therefore, the members of parliament themselves, the symbol of indirect democracy, i.e.

weak democracy, was weakened. they say that you believe that this is the case , that is, in a semi-presidential system, the people's participation in choosing the ruler is less. in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful, your time and all my dear ones are good. regarding the rationality of absari

, we say that this water should cure the disease if you want water not only did you not conquer it, but your desire to drink increased, there is probably something wrong with this drinking water. what is there is that governance must achieve a certain goal. whether it is a presidential system, a parliamentary system, a semi -presidential system, a semi-parliamentary system, or titles like these, in my opinion , these are not relevant at all, these are methods, that is, we should have discussed the content and nature once. let's have a deep conversation and then go to the shape of what exists. a political system should be established that follows the will of the majority while respecting the rights of the minority. now that which form can better advance this goal is our next issue. the serious problem here is that we basically

forgot the purpose of governance. we have completely forgotten that we did not come to protect you. we here in fact , we did not come to determine the assignment. a nation has one desire, one will, the political will of the nation must rule. now, if we want to come from the second step and start from the second step , in my opinion, this question is fundamentally wrong , that is, you came and left that content, that essence, that goal of governance aside, now you say now i want to pour it in a glass or a bowl. whether it is in a glass or in a bowl, this is the second step of our dispute. you say yes , usually they like water in a glass . what is important is the nature of the content

, but we can never say that the form does not affect the content. if you are a cinematographer, it is a part of cinema. in fact, the effect of the form is on us, the author directors we have, mainly because cinema is one of my very serious interests. and the politics of this the two together sometimes reach the same look. in the cinema, a director comes to make the form in a certain way. this is where your question arises. now, the goal is actually governance, which is to follow the will of the majority of the people. of course , the majority of the people may in fact , there should be demands that the rights of the minority should be respected. or the form is brought up, for example , bureaucracy is a form that leads us to accountability, transparency, in fact, to monitorability, so i will add a question, and then you

can answer the main question of mr. shayame how to proceed. there are people's opinions, let's not forget that if we want to talk, let's not forget the people's wishes , let's not forget the fight over what the form should be. yes, kiyar, excellent , thank you very much. well, both of us will talk for about four minutes. let's go, my colleagues , prepare a report, compile different opinions on this matter . parliamentary system is moving from the presidential system to the parliamentary system in a way to make the structure of the country more regular. some countries implement a completely parliamentary system in their political system do this method has positive points. with the establishment

of the parliamentary system, the coordination of powers will be more and decision making will be easier and some disagreements will be reduced. ali akbar hashemi rafsanjani, the former head of the expediency evaluation council favors the presidential system. the constitution clearly states: republic and islamic system are two inseparable pillars of the system of the islamic republic of iran. looking at this principle , it can be said that no factor is acceptable to limit republicanism and islamism, and in my opinion, turning the president into a prime minister who must get votes from the representatives limits the republican system. amir hossein ghazizadeh hashemi, the former deputy speaker of the parliament, supports the parliamentary system. it is necessary that a parliamentary system prevails in the country for a long time. the cabinet can be knocked down many times. after world war ii, one party ruled japan for 50 years. but the average life

of his cabinets was less than two years. we need to replace people quickly when necessary. but in a presidential system, if we go to anyone, a political crisis will arise. elias hazrati, a political activist , agrees. presidential system we experienced a period of parliamentary system in the 60s, but we did not get a positive response. on the other hand, in the discussion of presidential system and weakness we have not heard anything about it. people who suggest changing the presidential system to a parliamentary system . they should have a summary of the weaknesses of the presidential system so that we can look for a parliamentary system. well, thank you very much. let's go back to mr. dr. sheikhzadeh, mr. dr. sheikhzadeh, you say that you are actually a presidential system, one of the requirements of the presidential system is the formation of strong parties and the entry

of these parties into the political and policy-making field , considering that anyway all the experts agree that it is so. which should and maybe parties have not been formed in our country and most of the political currents are from time to time, they are formed on the occasion of elections and then they either disappear or at least their activities become less active. despite this attitude , do you still think that the presidential system can solve the problems of our country or not? i will return . regarding the goals that mr. dr. mahdavi said, let me give an explanation. by the way, i wanted to raise a serious question here. well , i

have a question for the friends who are talking about changing the political system and establishing a parliamentary system. so what are you looking for? is your goal of the parliamentary system deep democracy and democracy ? it means that this is a goal in itself or that you want to increase the efficiency of the system through the parliamentary system . of these , i have arguments that neither deepens the parliamentary system of democracy nor increases the efficiency of the system, which you raised in the rest of the program, mr. mizad. do you want an answer to mr. d' s question ? i am serious , a phenomenon like ahmadinejad cannot come out of the heart of

trump's parliamentary regime. it does not come out in the heart of the parliamentary regime now with the requirements it has and me i will talk about it in detail . there is a rationality, there is an elitism, in which massism means populism. if i want to walk with a green shawl and get votes, these things will not happen. it means that in the heart of your parliamentary regime, you have a refinement, a rationality. it's not that people want to express themselves on the wave of public opinion , but now we still don't understand whether iranians have historical memory or not , there is a very historical dispute, but in any case, the very deep point in my discussion is that the parliamentary regime i apologize for the guarantee of a certain percentage of your rationality conservatism is in it, in our country, conservatism is immoral, that is, i want to label someone bad and misguided, i say, you are a liberal, you are also conservatism, if

there is a logic hidden in conservatism, then there is actually a monitoring that is happening. his foot is in the heart of the parliamentary regime, but he says that love made it easy at first, but problems fell, problems fell, that's what mr. shayame said . according to the truth political tastes categorize people's expressions and monitor them elections regarding the selection of people should be the responsibility of the parties. i am completely in agreement with mr. doctor's statement in this paragraph. as long as the real party is not formed, if you want to change the political regime from this current situation to a parliamentary or semi-parliamentary one, what kind of democracy is this? this quasi-democracy will also disappear because.

in fact, i am coming to advance my political will in the form of guided election management. this is the current situation that the leader said so much about diversity and competition in the elections. you are now watching the elections in a week. it is easy that they will definitely get guaranteed votes because there is no competition. in many constituencies, you are facing people who are now fighting over who will go to you... politically, it is a product of the fact that you do not have a real party. the people of the polls they get in swimming pools, the polls they get in restaurants, the polls they get in circles and religious groups, turn this into political coalitions. it happens that today is another week of elections and you don't know who will actually enter the parliament. because it doesn't matter at all. because

there is no competition at all. a real party is also necessary for a parliamentary system the presidential system means that we cannot say that one of these needs a real party and the other does not, and by the way, i want to say that if we want to give a score, we should determine a percentage . you see, for example, england, which is a clear example of the party parliamentary system.