he came to the government from the ministry of oil and the deputy is also the deputy for legislative affairs, the deputy for parliamentary affairs and the deputy president for parliamentary affairs, so he is currently in the parliament, and i think that because of his expertise, his background, and the books he has written in the field of law, first about what are the legal weaknesses of the assemblies. what points still need to be corrected ? let us ask them. peace and peace be upon you. in the name of allah, the most merciful , the most merciful, and the most gracious. parliament periods in view they all have brilliant records.

they have both disadvantages and weaknesses, some of those disadvantages, such as the title of your program , are the lessons and lessons of the periods of the majlis . that is, those parts and events that were traumatic or created defects or could have been expressed in a more sublime way , should be seen by a person at one place , seeing the ups and downs of a phenomenon is both a lesson and a lesson. different eras are the same from the point of view of the law that you mentioned, we are in different eras

to be fair, we saw very good laws in their approval, but i also had some serious flaws. when i became a representative in the sixth parliament, i realized that it was a big weakness. there is a design for the parliamentary elections because all 30 seats in tehran belonged to the reformists and all the fundamentalists were left out of the parliament , or they were called conservatives at that time, whatever we say, they were left out and even one of them entered the parliament. it didn't happen, while having one-third of the votes means one-third of the votes. the last representative who entered the parliament was about 800,000 people. for example, 780,000 people

voted for them, but not even one seat was won. this goes back to the electoral system of the system. the election that we have is a majority system , the majority system has its merits, and the disadvantages of the proportional system versus the majority system, well, the one you say is quoted and the rest is possible with 5 thousand votes, with one vote at all, yes, with one vote, chairs and chairs, and not having a voice, this goes back to the nature this is the electoral system ruling the country because it is the majority it happens now, it's the same with you. if the elections in tehran become regional, this will not happen again. i say this is related to the nature of the electoral system, but according to the constitution, the boundaries of the constituencies are determined by the law. it should be stated from the beginning that the law that we wrote the same rail, these 11

terms that have passed based on those rules, first, at some point, our election systems will change, reforms will be added , but the shape will not change . one of the current problems of our election system is justice there is no election in it. let me give you an example . we have a population of about 300,000 with three nominees in the constituency, we have 3 million two nominees , they don't want to be named. well, the government should change this with a bill , or there are two ways. provided that he doesn't find money 75 times, the question that your excellency asked. let us go back to

what is the most important issue. well, the sign of the issues is there, the key word is there. we must observe a few points in the legislative system. law placing knowledge, science, and art at the same time. the principles of legislation, the legal principles of legislation must be observed, whether in presenting a proposal in the form of a bill, or in drafting and approving, and finally , the approval of the guardian council must be considered as legality. we have a problem in this section. i point. i would like to tell you that one of the complaints that some friends and some elders have is that we are facing an inflation of the law because the format of the sessions of the majlis, including the 6th majlis, where his highness

was present as our presiding officer, is the desire to detailing and problem solving in the format there is a plan to solve a problem, it is good in its place. it is necessary, but not sufficient. the great dispossession that we are facing during the parliament periods is that the members of the parliament do not have the desire to formulate and approve the society's laws. one of those shortcomings is that they do not see nationalism, it is not a national issue. legal phenomenon. let's look at one place. well, for example , the same point you mentioned in the discussion about the law of the electoral community, this is connected.

what is the election law related to the city and village councils, the parliament should have solid and unbreakable principles and foundations. in your opinion, the last time the constitution was amended was about 30 years ago, that is, the beginning of the decade, the end of the 60s, 686, 67, 67, for example , something like 35 years ago. do you think there is a need to revise it ? revision of the constitution and if revision is needed, in which direction should this amendment be done, for example, the senate? do we need or not , as a parliament, where eminent lawyers, who were for example two or three terms in the shura council, go there and in this so-called elementary way, in fact, without experience of writing the law or planning to write it

, the law should be repealed slowly, the law should have two stages, in the senate stage , any law should not be passed. basically, the principles of our constitution have two parts, the nature of which cannot be changed, that is, the republic, yes, and islam , the principles that control and govern these two principles cannot be changed . i want you to see that the current parliament has its merits in terms of being unicameral , its disadvantages are that you are a group that let me give you a little bit more knowledge, without conflict

of interests, without populist affiliations, with a scholarly, scientific approach to the law. a law that has a strong sense of permanence is less likely to come out of the unicameral parliament, but it is less likely to come out. supervision of the expediency detection set, of course, later. when we have a second parliament, i

would like to say, as the least understanding of parliamentary knowledge, we definitely need a second parliament, definitely a parliament that currently, we have and we had in the recent age and periods because of the lessons that people should learn from them . the 10th parliament is over, don't get me wrong, it is important, the head of the research center at the time of the parliament came and gave a report to the new representatives of al-worud in the share of the 10th parliament. there was no law for him at all. this became a partial law , a partial view of the issue, a part of this

was an agreement and an international treaty, the new law along with general reform of 55, please be careful, in a 4 -year period, 55 for the last few years in a row, according to the necessity and the need of the country's situation, the economic topic for the title of the year of economy. including the same year, it was the 95th economic year, one of the economic authors of hazrat mr. fahgami, out of these 55 new laws or general reforms, 9 were economic, that is, the approvals of the parliament are not patched and connected to the real needs of the society. can leave 2 to 4 budget laws aside for the year

of the economic law in the year when the main issues affecting the people are economic issues, livelihood, production, employment and it should be said that the value of the national currency and the set of monetary, financial, banking and budget systems is, well, this parliament is not coming to the second parliament, why is this , let me say one more thing in terms of form. i almost legitimized the deliberations of the parliament from the beginning to the presentation, that we were the ones who are now in the field of work, mr. afghani , 49% of the time in the open court, it does not matter much whether people hear or not, these averages are the average time when the bell rings, from the beginning to the bell. the assembly eats at the end. the useful time of optimal use in the field

of effective monitoring was 49 percent, the useful time was 50 and a half percent, and the lack of it is a shame. see the lessons here. definitely, now we are making plans for the people , for our loved ones who will be proud to say that they are happy. representation in the parliament will be divided. they should see that when entering, what are the priorities , what are the harms, what are the problems here, why does this happen, why is it so important, if the representatives of the aristocracy do not have the tools of the law, the sources of the law , it will become routine, that is, most of them are amateurs. this sentence

we used to have representatives and we are having them now , i won't tell you about them now because i myself had their colleagues . you were a representative for ten terms, two terms, three terms, four terms . this microphone behind you is minus that. your speech time was 10 minutes, we changed it to 7 minutes, 7 minutes, you see, there is a time quota for the representative of 7 minutes. once every two months, by lottery, an emergency speech of 5 minutes, of course

, now it is 3 minutes, two minutes, and one minute. other than that , we have representatives in different periods of lessons . their number is considerable, that is, one or two , 10, 20, 30, 40, 50. there is no appreciable number of times in the legislative process regarding the proposal. left with the proposal about the proposal to provide a plan to remain silent and similar fry items and examples. taghlin's servant did not comment once. why? because he is not familiar with the constitution. the internal regulation of the parliament is the main tool. it is a compass. it does not control the constitution. it does not master the upstream documents. it does not dominate the general policies communicated.

it should be mentioned that the program has been developed for 5 years, which is its current name. it has changed, it doesn't have the necessary aristocracy , i don't want to say that a representative should know all of these things, he should definitely know the legal doctrine that governs them , he should know the legal principles that govern them from his creative mind and strong memory. it provides an alternative, it offers a solution to ambiguity , the representative wants to defend the rights of the nation and move the legislation towards the right direction and legal principles and legislation , he must have a strong mental memory and a high level of mental and legal preparation so that you can disagree and know your agreement. an agreement changes the direction of the parliament, or a logical opposition changes the direction of the parliament, so this is our damage, this is our lesson, this is how you say that not only the supreme assembly is necessary, or whatever we call it,

the senate, but it is also necessary that these representatives since they are selected, there is a mandatory familiarization course they should pass the laws and the doctrine governing the laws according to your words, and do you believe that this will not be approved in the fifth parliament, which is a live issue, and a training course has been proposed. . this proposal was not voted on in sahan. you see , now there is a gap of 3 months between the time when the representative is elected, that is, the vote is taken, and the time when the first meeting is held. let's calculate roughly two months. it takes two months for an intensive course to be held. it's useless, if that's the case the government can present a bill in this

parliament, the twelfth parliament, no, this is related to the internal regulations, the internal regulations are the powers and duties of your representatives, that is, you can't do anything as the legal deputy of the president, not the legal assistant, not the acting deputy, not the deputy of the government. the government, because the discussion related to the by-laws, which also needs a third vote, is designed by the representatives themselves, the plan is presented and approved in the parliament itself, in this area, none of the powers have the right to interfere, like the internal regulations of the government, no one else can for government of the internal code. in the 10th parliament, the elections are over some people didn't vote, some people got votes. i was not a candidate from the constituency. when a plan is presented to amend the election law, i say this. maybe the audience won't believe what the plan was

. removing some of the conditions necessary to become a candidate, for example, was in the law. obligation. acting on absolute velayat, the jurist, removing the word absolute against the constitution, another condition is the practical commitment to the islamic republic of iran . up to the bottom of me. i will analyze the obstacles of the experts in the discussion and be able to comment on the review we did in the parliament

. agree with me. what a double double. turn around the menu yes, you are in charge of negotiations. may god protect the guardian council and the institution of the guardian council. up to 80 rounds of re- voting. i said this is wrong. let them see the heroic retreat in the 10th reformist parliament. of course, these events may have a good plan. and it can really compensate for some of those defects and shortcomings. well, in the 10th parliament please let me know what other important events happened, that is, how was the assembly going and how much. he actually helped to create a terrorist-minded assembly . you see, mr. ofgami, you were in a parliament that

, after all , had their own special issues and margins of the 10th parliament. based on the experience and methods and approaches of the list, it was hoped that one hand of tehran would vote for sita , as usual, 30 to 30, that one side would be presented in that parliament, that at the same time, while actions and reactions i want that money. work sometimes, maybe the bitterness of work, other friends whether or not i have something to say in that parliament

, first of all, i believe that the parliament should have a strong, efficient and effective minority . in general, the nature of the parliament is the fluidity required by the parliament . the parliament is one hand, which is a view of one hand, does not mean that everyone says yes, everyone says no , one hand in compliance with the principles of legislation may be a single political current, but different literature will be presented to have legislation, but i believe that if the objections are the voices in the framework the revolution and the red lines of the revolution in the parliament. ok , information helps the authority of the parliament and the efficiency of the tenth parliament it had this feature to some extent. we were a minority, but

an effective minority. for example, it's a strange thing . we collected signatures three times to ask the president at the time of mr. rouhani , and he was rejected from the election. finally, in which parliament was he formed? in the 10th reformist parliament , i asked the president, who is the spiritual leader , vahid, who was the spiritual leader. seven people answered this question in a secret way. i was a slave , mr. misri was mr. zunoor, mr. mohammad dehghan was mr. mohsen koken was there . you know all of us

. what is wrong with this scene? there are some places where the text is underlined. for example, it should not be sharp. equal vote with more than two political incompetence. thirdly, there was this point in the essad assembly that was really a political surprise. this point is another point. remember, i say this in parentheses to our dear great nation, who are the teachers of all of us. i will also say the same point in the introduction. i was a teacher first. i am proud that whatever i have may be blessed god and god's parents and the family and the job of a teacher, i am proud even now that if i do something , i would be proud of being a teacher

again . and dear viewers. i was saying that my election is coming. in the eyes of the enemy, the fundamentalist parliament has no relevance. the enemy is against the principle of the legislative body in the islamic republic. yes , why did the imam say that preserving the system of the islamic republic is an obligation? obligatory. which is one of the pillars the necessity of forming the enemy's parliament is against the principle of the institution of the parliament, that's why

isis attacks in the 10th parliament. yes. in the 11th parliament, a fundamentalist hypocrite attacks cyber and it happens. i don't want to say this at all , i apologize. when isis acted, the chairman of the meeting announced that a safe area had been established, and the representatives could go out. things happen here. i did not show up once. the legitimate negotiations were not interrupted. the representative did not come out at all . he said, "no, we will remain in speech, or we will kill, or we will be killed. look at this point, when the parliament the islamic republic has these forms as well, now minus those shazi political ijtihads that may be created in behavior. the second point is when the revolutionary guard put the enemy in the list of terrorists.

dear mr. afkhami from religious minorities. religious minorities and the minority of sunni brothers, reformists and fundamentalists, hard-liners and tis. radical and non-radical , we wore the uniform of the corps. this is very valuable. this is one of the places that should really be seen by majlis dovazam with an instructive look. there is absolutely no conflict of interest in legislation. because one representative has two conflicting interests or region or, for any reason , he is silent about some measures, or at most he wants to use surveillance tools, the highest criticism

is that one minister goes, another minister goes through the same channel. respecting the law and in implementing the law , even if it is wrong, we must obey the ijtihad against the explicit text of the law. it is heart-burning that these ijtihads happen for no reason and create a blind spot in front of the next managers or the next councils. the implementation of the law is aimed at subsidies, if you remember, there are 50 and 20 what does it mean? what i remembered recently is that we should give 50% to strengthen the weak classes who are suffering, 30% to strengthen the production, 20% is at the disposal of the government , which can compensate for the losses. see if people

are having problems from this 20%. 5. economic, industrial, production and services, those who are creating problems in the field of production, this did not happen, 50, 30, 20, it did not happen, and it was not supposed to be cash. of course, the parliament made some moves in its own time, but it did not lead to results. he was worried that god forbid he fell into the trap of confrontation. and it was not supposed to be completely cash. cash and non-cash. non-cash complete deletion. raising the monetary base of the country. one of the injuries is here. the problem is that we don't really have a bottleneck at the end of the government, we don't have a scale.

we don't have a place to know what the government has delivered and what it has delivered. of course, fortunately , i can say that in the 11th parliament, a good plan was given that at the end of the government, a team was formed to list what the government has and what it doesn't have, so that whoever keeps it later, we will offer you a box full of dirhams. it should be said that the treasury was completely empty, and this has not yet become a law problem you supervised the 8th, 10th, and actually the 11th parliament , so i want to ask whether the role of oligarchs

or