in the last step, select the save option . now you can easily see the list of election channels. in these advertising channels , the promotional videos of the candidates and their debates are going to be aired so that we can participate in the elections with the right information about each representative. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, dear viewers , good morning, welcome to the news of the stock market. the managing director of the central securities depository company announced march 10 as the last chance to receive the dividends of the deceased's equity shares. according to mr. baghestani, the possibility of extending the time for more than ten pesos for the heirs due to the time of the registration and distribution process inheritance equity shares exist. the central securities exchange

said: for those who are registered and have a valid bank registration number, their dividends will be deposited simultaneously with the second stage of the payment of equity dividends for the year 1401. mr. baghestani also said: if the owners of adalat shares cannot go through the process of transferring shares by march 10th, they should not worry because their dividends will be paid in the next stages. is. according to the announcement of the stock exchange organization, the inflow of legal liquidity to the brokerages was more than 1,245 billion tomans became. during this period , he also recorded transactions of commodity exchanges worth 3495 billion tomans. of this

amount, about 3,1970 billion tomans were related to commodity exchange transactions and 2,315 billion tomans were related to energy exchange transactions. all indicators of the glass hall were negative in monday's trading. on this day, the trading price of small and medium shares of the stock market experienced a greater fall. all stock market indices decreased on monday. the main indicator of the stock market on this day began its downward movement from the very beginning of trading and ended with a negative return of 81 percent. it ended and with a decrease of 1670 units , it reached the level of 2 million and 4937 units. the equal weight index also increased with a negative return of 884% on the number of 71249 units . to experience

on this day, the glass hall witnessed the exchange of more than 5.75 billion shares and financial bonds in 320 thousand times with a value of 3760 billion tomans. the symbols of shasta, beh mellat nouri and parsan had the most negative impact on the stock market index, and in contrast to the symbols of se dasht, zob, kassapa and qaran, they were among the limited green symbols that affected the index. the whole effect was positive. index of capital inflow and outflow at the end of trading on monday. the news of the withdrawal of 347 billion tomans gives real money. on this day, more than 338 billion tomans of real money was withdrawn from fixed income funds so that the balance of these funds became negative. during monday's transactions , the largest inflow of real money was allocated to the groups of hotels and restaurants, agriculture and food products , the largest outflow of real money was made from the groups of chemical products, banks and mass production. the condition of the symbols of the glass hall also indicated that 111 positive symbols and 645. the symbol was negative than the hall

85 of the symbols of the market have become negative. in addition, 35 icons faced the buying queue and 114 icons faced the sales page. the total value of purchase pages was 102 billion tomans, the total value of sales pages was 356 billion tomans. ghazal arab gul of sed and cima news agency. low volume and value of stock market transactions, stock market trends , monday stock market trading trends. as in the previous days, the follow-up was still slow. experts consider the most important reason for the fluctuating and declining trend of the capital market in recent days due to the value of the stock price of issuing special deposit certificates from the monetary policy. according the central bank's decision to issue a special deposit certificate with a rate of 30% has caused an increase in the game rate without market risk and in such a way that the rate. the yield

of fixed income bonds has reached over 30% in the market and has had a negative impact on the capital market and the price of most companies on the stock market. investors have started withdrawing capital from the stock market. the transaction statistics of the iran commodity exchange in february this year show that in this month, more than 14 million varieties of goods along with 337 vehicles worth 1458 billion tomans were sold in the physical market, which compared to the month of december. the order of growth and one tenth and 64 hundredths in the cold in the volume and. this statistic was recorded in bahman with the transaction of 14 million tons of all kinds of goods compared to the same period last year. in the production sector

, we had an increase of about 31% in the trading volume, and in the value sector and in the rial sector, about 60%. the next point is that when the dollar rate actually increases. in fact, the exchange rate will become saudi , and as a rule, there will be an activity and a boom, in fact, in the commodity sector. in february , the highest value of transactions belonged to the group of industrial and mineral products. the gas cut of sponge iron producers since late december and early january has caused the supply of this product will be disrupted and most of the members will be out of stock. it was the burden of these companies that the largest volume of transactions in the same group of petroleum products due to the positive chemical performance of gas and feed, basically, in the last 3 months of the year, both the volume of supply in the physical market of iran commodity exchange increases and the volume of demand

due to it is the end of the year and the upcoming holidays, so many buyers are actually buying and many manufacturers are trying to sell their products in the winter season in the industry. agriculture, despite the low supply of products , we saw a positive return of 9% in the volume of transactions, which according to experts, this positive return was due to the acceptance of loose cotton in the commodity exchange. the deal was made. the value of these transactions was more than 12 thousand billion tomans. 227 thousand tons of all kinds of steel sections were sold in the hall of industrial and mineral products. the petrochemical and petroleum products hall

experienced the transaction of 18,000 tons of granulated sulfur base oil and others. about 197,000 tons of cement were also sold in the cement hall. the transaction volume in the auction hall is more than 174 thousand. it was ten. the export hall witnessed the transaction of 25 thousand tons of non-moisture insulation. 4 thousand tons of products were traded in the free market. from raising capital to stopping some symbols and holding public and extraordinary meetings and disclosing important information in the kodal package on the news line. according to the report published in the kodal system, according to the woman manipulating the market, the symbol of madeira is up to 12. febston and qivan trading symbols were subject to clearing the trading knot. the opinion of the auditor and the

legal inspector regarding the justification report of the increase of the capital of the board of directors of ismada qafars from the place of the accumulated profit. was presented. fajam symbol of capital increase from the place of accumulated profit. it was registered in the company registration authority. according to the market manipulator, the madeira trading symbol is suspended until the 12th of aspen at the latest. the proposal of the board of directors to the extraordinary general meeting regarding the increase of capital, symbols of three plains and other things from the place of accumulated profit that reached the image of the board of directors, was sent to the auditor and legal inspector for comment. increase the capital of zob symbol from surplus.

at the end of the 7th of march, the transactions were stopped. the meeting of the general assembly symbolizes the manifestation of order. the vote regarding capital increase will be held on sunday, march 20th to be zahra, a scientist of sed and cima news agency. thank you for your companion. the importance of elections in electing a strong parliament, the key is in the hands of the people, iranian coach sharaf iran has a telegram with the whole country.

the revolution emphasized the real competition as one of the pillars of the elections. also, in explaining the real competition, they said that the field should be open for the presence of various political, economic and cultural trends in the big election race so that all viewpoints are active in this field. radio and television, in this right, and to depict and strengthen these competitions, will also hold a debate for people to get to know more he held the opinions of different trends, which is now in another special part of the higher program. we present it to you.

he asked the same questions to the candidates of the islamic council elections in their election videos, which we will present to you. one of the topics on which different views have been formed is whether we should give subsidies for basic goods to the final consumer or not. in this mo-afghan program , the opponents will have a debate with each other, and i invite you to accompany us until the end. . here in our studio, mr. mohammadi, an economic expert mr. rastehgar is also present as the opposite of the issue. the head of the tehran chamber of commerce will discuss the issue that i have presented to you as a matter of agreement. greetings and blessings to both guests of the program, i would like to start with mr. mohammadi and the question of your opposition to the payment of subsidies for basic goods to the consumer. finally , what is the reason, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings to the noble nation of iran and respected huzar. basically, subsidy is the purpose of subsidy and when was the logic of subsidy formed in the economic literature of the world after world war. second, the inflation increased sharply and the recession started

markets were in control. in order to support the production sectors, subsidies or subsidies were formed . in order to support a part of the economy or a part of businesses, producers subsidize a product or a specific item in order to increase the general welfare of the society. . now, with a very brief discussion , whether the subsidy should be paid in cash at the beginning of the chain or at the end of the chain , the decision-maker and franz are not talking about cash or non-cash subsidies. above this issue of subsidies from mr in a few days, less than a week, we have to go to the polls to vote for the members of the parliament

to make economic decisions in the next 4 years, the consequences of which may take years, because of this examination of the various aspects of this issue, that is, listening. giving this issue and dealing with it through several programs is worth it because we will benefit from this in the years to come. in 1401 , the parliament made a decision regarding subsidies to transfer the subsidy from the beginning of the chain to the end of the chain. almost two years have passed since the implementation of this plan we can check whether the result of this review leads to our choice and continuing this path or correcting this path because of this subsidy payment to basic goods at the beginning of the chain or at the end of the chain . you tried the result once and people with the same amount. with subsidies, they can do the same purchase, the same amount of goods or not, so

deciding on this matter may take an hour of our time, but the results and its effects may last for years, that is, from in your opinion, the reason why we have inflation now is partly because of this change, the subsidy was paid from the beginning the chain to the end of the chain is a part of this. inflation because if we pay the subsidy to the first three deciles or the first five deciles in cash, this is the subsidy that will be paid. it completely turns into demand and this demand is inflationary, so this inflation that is created is partly due to the general inflation of the country's economy and partly due to the subsidy that was paid to the people. the chain or paid to the final consumer, how much with the orders of mr. mohammad

, i hope to serve you and the respected viewers so that there is a good mood in the country and god willing, we will go towards the improvement of the people's condition. it should be said that the most important debate in the topic of subsidies is the explanation of wealth. basically, the redistribution of wealth in different countries has its own tools and mechanisms. we study the countries. different studies show that different methods are common. in any case, the subsidy payment now includes a cash system, a commodity system, a universal price system, and our commodity system in the fifth development plan .

however, the area was told, some of them believed. basically, what has caused people to not have a good feeling about whether it is the beginning of the chain or the end of the chain is that they do not have a real feeling that this subsidy is going to reach them anyway . whether it really reached them or not, one of the reasons could be that we did not have stability in the price of goods in the country. which is sometimes applied in non-cash form

there is a real feeling that the product they are consuming has been subsidized, which means that they have been helped . this feeling is not present in the society. one of the reasons is that the management of the person who receives the subsidy seems to be the end of the chain. which can be more accurate, we sometimes allocate a subsidy to a product, but that product is really a subsidy. it was not tangible, acceptable, or usable for all members of the society . basically, those who actually receive the subsidy can manage it themselves, but it should not have any consequences. this subsidy does not go

to a specific direction, so it needs planning, which should be done by the people in charge anyway, so naturally, you are against it. i conditionally accept this issue , that is, if we are going to give even a cash subsidy to the so-called target society, everyone who needs a subsidy should receive it, or now in any segment of the society, this can be useful conditionally, i emphasize again that the discussion there is no difference between cash or non-cash subsidies . let's give the subsidy, for example, to the producer or to the importer.

if the end of the chain or the final consumer is paid, what problems do you think this will have? first of all, we have to see what is the logic of our purpose , we give subsidies to the low income groups so that their purchasing power increases and their welfare is maintained , or do we want to keep the country's economy afloat, if our resources are limited, we have to choose a part of the country's production. stay or give let the people decide for themselves. either we want to explain wealth or we want to explain rent or poverty. all this has consequences. for example , if we want to give 100 and... units of subsidy , we will allocate our resources to 100 units, this is the first of the chain of basic goods. let's assume that the production of this product

has four or five stages, and in each stage of production , we imagine a profit for the producer. these 100 units are given at the beginning of the chain. at the end of the chain , the finished price for the consumer will be about 80 units. but if we want to give the same 100 units to the end of the chain, that is, the first step is to do the same 100 units of production cost, 120 units or 100 units of production cost. at each step, the profit of the producer is added to this. at the end of the chain, the price will be 250 units. you are 100 units. you subsidize it, how much do people pay? it should be 150 units. in the first case , you have to pay 85 units and 85 units. people say that this difference is due to the transfer of friends from the beginning of the chain to the end of the chain. if the production chain of the product

has more than four production stages, this distance will be much longer. but there is a disadvantage in the system of giving subsidies to the first in the chain, which leads to the issue of corruption, out-of-network supply, and non-targeting of the subsidy. comes, and if the executive legislator comes to give subsidies to the end of the chain, he will take responsibility from himself, which means that it is much easier for you to come to the end of the chain and give first. whatever happened to the chain until the end of the chain, your monitoring responsibility will not become more prominent, but if you want to give subsidy at the beginning of the chain, and the subsidy from the beginning of the chain, we have to monitor each step, because monitoring becomes more difficult, we do not choose the harder work , we go for the easy work. the one that seems to be more comfortable. then, if we give the subsidy to the people at the end of the chain , because the inflation exceeds the amount of the subsidy we pay, it becomes a self-

destructive subsidy. it means that the amount of the subsidy that is given increases the inflation, my inflation is more than the amount of the subsidy , and the subsidy that you gave is actually burned. to be you had the experience of 2009 when you gave 4,500 tomans in cash subsidies to people. well this the purchasing power of this subsidy was 4,500 tomans in 2089, equivalent to 11 to, for example, 16 kilograms of chicken. after 10 years , an inflation occurred. 4,500 tomans had the purchasing power of less than one kilogram of chicken . you didn't create it, so your first goal, which was to create prosperity , was not achieved by paying help at the end of the chain. mr. rostehgan, you see, one of our problems in the discussion of the current system is that we

experienced the beginning of the chain or the end of the chain during now, in the past periods, almost a third of the country's income is spent on subsidies. this is based on statistics, but we don't see its effects. give a subsidy to the goods , but the end of the chain, which is the target society of this subsidy anyway, cannot adjust itself to the costs with that subsidy. well, this shows that there is something wrong with the work, if it is the beginning of the so-called. now, the basic product that is being discussed now should be subsidized, then you look at the end of the work of a series of people they are not able to adjust themselves properly, that is, to adapt

to the existing costs. well, this shows that we have tried and made several rounds of trial and error in order to know the beginning of the chain or the end of the chain, but the point is that when 1/ 3. the country's income is spent on subsidies. but that end of the chain can't support itself , it doesn't have its main capability or it can't manage the use of the so-called subsidy. well, this is a fundamental problem. a subsidy should also be given to the end of the chain . it must be conditional on what kind of product it should be used in. you can give your opinion . you can see more about it. for example, let's give an example of nano , anyway, considering that now bread is

one of the goods. it is basic, well, the real subsidy is given by the government, but you look at the quality of the bread that the final consumer should have, that is, the quality that the subsidy goes to. we gave a subsidy to the price of bread, but is it really? quality with the weight that should reach the consumer category, we basically do not have monitoring tools, if we have it , it is very weak, or if we have it, it is scattered , that is, it is not continuous, that is why it seems that if this subsidy payment is made conditional , we will reach the end of the chain. let's do the so-called purposeful work, it can definitely have positive effects , thank you mr. mohammadi. as i said

, mr. bestgar, referring to the allocation of subsidies to the beginning of the chain or to the end of the chain in any way , that is, without monitoring, without follow-up, you are definitely wrong, whether it is the beginning of the chain or the end of the subsidy chain. if you don't allocate enough monitoring, you won't get the desired output . let's face it, this is the easiest thing for the subsidy executive to do is for you to come and give the end of the chain and not have anything to do with monitoring and don't do those hard steps and hard work, but if you gave, did you pay at the beginning of the chain , were the supervisions enough? it was standard, we had experience, but without supervision, we have allocated, but without supervision, without effective supervision, if effective supervision. if there is

, the beginning of the chain will be more effective than you look at the issue from the point of view of production. if you don't support the different parts of the production from the beginning of the chain, they will leave the cycle of competition over time. this is the same class that receives subsidies or benefits from your subsidy. if you destroy the chain , destroy the chain from the beginning to the end and there will be no support. gave and about me.

making the work that is subsidized more expensive. well, if from if it is expensive, it will be destroyed again, that goal will not be realized, but if there is a wealth from our place, if we want this wealth to be explained, there is a discussion about what kind of explanation should be given, for example, the issue of goods such as our health , if to at the end of the chain, we want to allocate

how people can enter. what our country has done is not customary in the world. yes, it is not customary. do they want to do it, and if they don't do it, could they do it? it was called obamacare the main basis is to help the health of the people or allocate subsidies to ensure the health of the next president because his resources were too high and the plan of the rival party was abandoned . the next president who came was a member of mr. obama's party. he wanted to give a subsidy, but he couldn't give a subsidy. well, we saw that many of the goods that were imported

were imported anyway. or in any case, a subsidy has been given inside versh, if