the air conditioner in the big iranian house was started under exceptional conditions. this year's price will be paid in the next year until 2:00 am in tehran .

you are on the other side of the table, in the eyes of a martyr, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. hello and good night, dear viewers of the news channel . sir , let me greet you and welcome you to the first line program and congratulations. i say your choice from the side the people of your region, as their representatives , are very welcome in the islamic council . please seek permission from god . i am at your service, dear colleagues

, on the front page of the program, i would like to express my appreciation and thanks, and to serve you, my dear viewers , i say hello and good night, god willing, this interview that we are at your service tonight can be fruitful and useful, god willing. a report is ready if you agree, let's look at it first and then ask our questions with mr. yes, we are at your service . be healthy. mohammad bayat, place of birth, chaharcheshmeh, khomin city, date of birth, 30th of shahrivar, 1355, educational qualification, doctoral student, specialized in planning , residence in khomin, number of children, two employment records

, history of membership in the fourth, fifth and sixth periods of the islamic council of the city of khomin, vice president of education and physical training, and parvesh shahran khomein, professor of payam noor universities of central province and khomein city, islamic azad university, khomein branch, faculty of quranic sciences and teacher training centers, hozva. it is optional khomein city, tell me one law left on the ground that you will follow up in the parliament to be implemented . it is a matter of social justice. an example of this is in your field of service , health and treatment. there is a class gap. those who are actually rich take advantage of the conditions of health and treatment. brand, but people who are vulnerable and low-income groups are actually the country from this. they are exempted

. do you agree with the transparency of votes, gifts and letters of mps? apart from military secrets , we are 100% in agreement with clarification in any field. 3 what is the main problem of the electoral field and its solution from your point of view? one is the issue of industry that if we provide water, electricity, gas infrastructure , employment will definitely be created and unemployment will be high. there is a cultural issue and one is an agricultural issue . do you agree or disagree with increasing the retirement age? no , it will have its own damages. workers' and employees' salaries should increase according to inflation or proportionally. i agree that workers' and employees' salaries are more than if it is inflated, it means that their experiences should be included in this story.

do you agree with the subsidy of the rich and the high earners? no, no, they are citizens. however, hidden subsidies should be targeted let's do more. low income and vulnerable groups will benefit. do you agree with giving cheap dollars to importers and producers or giving subsidies to the people themselves in order to get cheap bread, medicine and basic goods to the people? by giving subsidies to the people themselves because it is closer to social justice. should the gasoline subsidy be allocated to the national code of people or to the car? if it is allocated to the national code, and the social justice that we talked about and i said to the dear listeners, it will be considered better . what support is needed for the rejuvenation and increase of the population?

with the low interest of providing housing, the people should elect the president or the people should elect the president's assembly. a pension for a house. how much should a family of four be covered by the relief and welfare committee when the head of the family is disabled? as much as the wage of the labor law, two thirds of the wage of the labor law, half of the wage of the labor law, one third of the wage of the labor law? it should be as much as the wage of the work law so that at least they can make a living and solve their current issues. do you agree with capital id tax? yes of course. for merchants, in fact , buying and selling, not for those who are in the field of production do you agree with the import of cars ? yes, 100 because it makes the space for buying and selling cars more competitive and makes

our domestic manufacturers offer their products with better quality. now, mr. bayat. they are present in the front page studio to explain and explain some of these questions that they answered before , how was the interview that you did and what was done, what is your assessment, mr. brid, in our turn, in the famous phrase i am grateful to the creator. i am grateful to the creator. anyone who does not thank the creation has not thanked the creator. my kind from all the dear ones of sada and vesima who are the platform of this program. i thank you for providing this document, it was in line with social justice

, in line with the fact that candidates who don't have money and spend a lot of money on advertising should use this capacity. i will raise these questions that your excellency answered again, while the answer is short. the debate on the transparency of gifts and the debate on the transparency of mps' letters how much do you agree with this principle of transparency do you agree at all or not yes 100% agree i want to be honest with people, to be transparent , to be honest in all fields, in fact. because the people trust us, we must always have the support of the people with us, based on the letter of 53 mullahs, peace be upon him, to malik ashar, in which they say that sir, i

agree with transparency in all matters except military secrets. we agree with the transparency of the things you said in all fields, except for military secrets, which are an integral part of the system and in line with the country's macro policies, many representatives may agree with you before they enter the parliament. it should be transparent and very straightforward and honest to inform everything, but it is accepted that sometimes we find ourselves in the same situation, now party relations, gang relations, some expediency , rightly or wrongly, for any other reason. it is possible for them to act very transparently. it is not possible for you to be in such a position and if it happens, you still believe that it should be transparent

. i am a revolutionary because i am a servant of the system and the revolution and my leader, and i am a people because they are servants of the people. i am my party, my people, my coalition are people, my power is people, our wealth is people, so according to this, we have nothing , we have no hidden layer with the people. we are transparent all the time at any cost. for example, if a resolution is passed in the parliament, in the case that there is no conflict, it will harm the people of your region, but it will lead to national interests . if you vote against it, it means to act in the interest of the people of your region. well, it is in conflict with the national interest. if you act in the interest of the national interest, you should answer your constituency. you may have one vote here. if you don't want to now, it means that you want to consider the national interests, but don't have a challenge in the constituency, so

you don't act transparently. if such a conflict occurs , what is your decision? we think nationally and act regionally . this is definitely what you say. as you said , we consider the national interests, but in those internal regulations and at your service, the things that are internal, i definitely consider the interests of my own city to be taken into account, anyway, in the internal regulations that are the government. we will correct them with the consultations we will have with the honorable ministers in fact, the people of my city should not be excluded from this story and benefit from it. do you agree with increasing the retirement age? no, i disagree. because really, considering the youth of the population that we have a problem with in this area of ​​service, we must employ young people to work, not by age.

in any case, their solution is to provide their own expenses from somewhere, in fact , don't include their own capital sources in the opening age. do they supply other places, or sometimes their logic and reasoning is that they say, well, a person who has been working for 30 years , or 25 years, or 30 years, is working now and he retires when he reaches the retirement age, he is still in his youth and he can be very fruitful with just one experience. it can also work, now they can let us free those who actually like to retire at a higher age in terms of retirement age

, in fact take the age into account, but those who don't like it at the same age of 30 as the case actually asked. and their demand is to retire, which means we can be of service to you we have a dual design for your service programs in this part, which depends on the person himself, as he sees fit. if you reach the age of open sitting, then this procedure will not disturb the funds. however , i would like to tell you that we should not forget the youth of the young forces, that is, we should not pay for the service of the pension funds.

do you believe that if this age does not increase, the job market will be better for the younger people to work ? what should young people do , there is really no job market for them , they are looking for this sitting force to be removed from the office scene as soon as possible so that they can find a replacement and start working. so what is your definition of employment only in offices? no, it is everywhere in public and private debates. that is, other than, for example, an employee in a private office or public sector, yes. do you think there is another space for employment ? it is different from the capacity that has been graduated, the fields that have been graduated. how can you make the most of it and use it in the field of work, not only in the administrative field?

in this report that was aired, you said that the opponents are right about the subsidies of the high earners and the rich . yes, what is your argument? my argument is that i would like to tell you that the high earners are citizens as well as fellow iranians , but the subsidies are hidden. those fellows exist we should target the hidden things so that the vulnerable and low-income groups benefit more from it , like what, for example, in the discussion of gasoline, in the discussion of gasoline , suppose those people who are high earners, maybe one person has 10 cars. let's face it hard , it is definitely a relief for those high-income groups, but if it is applied to the national code, then everyone will benefit, everyone

will benefit . it is sometimes said that everyone should benefit as much as they need okay, this subsidy is not in conflict with that. where is the conflict? let me know, for example, suppose that a person who is wealthy does not need it at all, for example. it is not a small amount that is paid as a subsidy , but when it is aggregated, it can include, for example, a significant number of people who really need you . in any case, it is unfair because the financial status of afra is not the same

. in principle, they have a better financial situation because after all, this is the capital of the whole country, now i have nothing to argue whether it is true or not , i just want your excellency's answer, of course, because they also have a commitment to the country, they have a commitment to the system , maybe they should manage this small subsidy themselves. regarding your service, in relation to your service , they receive a subsidy from the country and receive it . water, gas, electricity, gasoline

, all that we have, we hide it all of them should be deleted and you say this directly to each other, go to the needy or that part of the helpers , where do the helpers come from, for example, suppose that a part of it is from a purposeful place, from the place of something , another part is the price of energy carriers, and a part of it is as if you open the same thing that happens in the hidden subsidy happens in the direct subsidy . what difference does it make if it was direct, we give it to those higher deciles, if it is hidden, we don't see it, or vice versa, this is my argument. it was very determined because it is hidden in your service, maybe not everyone can give an objective example. you were talking about gasoline , it was about vehicles, cars that i told you, but your service is directly at your service, because

it has the right of citizenship and fellow iranians, it should be presented to them, very well. another issue is the issue of basic goods such as bread , medicine and basic goods, which was one of the most challenging issues . before making a decision, of course, believe that no, it is not necessary that the currency of rosh raya should be available. in principle , don't offer the government subsidy and then this subsidy will come to the people, which means that the price of bread will increase, but the people should receive it so that they can consume it at a reasonable price. which idea do you like ? social justice is closer, now this has happened, that's right , it's almost better now, yes, to some extent, because

i actually led the nomowais in my constituency, satisfaction. it is favorable to some extent, now apart from nawai, for example, on basic goods, on the price of meat yes, the people of your constituency are satisfied with yes , they are somewhat satisfactory, so you believe that government width should not be available for the importer to enter with free width, for example, but in the form of social justice subsidy. it is closer and that some say it will lead to an increase in inflation and an increase in prices . you do not accept that the prices will go up in the market. anyway, you are talking about your liquidity, not your criticism, not that you will finally release the bread, for example, or for example , let's assume that you want to know what meat is imported if you bring this cloth with the government width , then the price will be lower. if the width is free, it will be more expensive. you understand that the free width

should be applied. the government width should be removed, so the cloth will reach people at a higher price. in any case , there will be a price increase in my market. it causes that it may have an effect on other things, after all , it has an inflationary effect, although you say that we compensate for this with direct subsidies. i do, but many people believe that it cannot be compensated and that the inflation it creates is finally effective. they will manage and they will have the saving that they should have in the field, and wastefulness will be avoided. very well, i am talking about the gasoline subsidy , which you said, believe that it should be allocated to the national code of people. it means that he should use it. when we say , it will be deposited into the national code. they will actually benefit from this

if they want to actually use public transportation. no , i don't have a car now. i also have a national code. i don't have a car. i assign my national code, for example, this 60 lite comes in a card like now. to use it is closer to justice than to deprive you of your service at all because you don't have a means of transportation at all, that is, if no one gave you a means of transportation. put it in his account in cash , if he has enough cash in his account so that he can spend it in other places

, he can spend it purposefully in the area of ​​cash transportation. that you believe that instead of the parliament, with the same mechanism that exists at the moment, that is, the people should choose the president in the elections, there is no difference at all. electoral assembly do it or the people, because after all the parliament is also the representatives of the people, what difference does it make if the people choose the representatives? well , it is closer to the religious democracy that we actually have, the people should choose , the people should participate, they should be involved in every election. we have gone through a lot in the field of islamic councils in the same way, and even in the discussion of the assembly of leadership experts in the same way. there are representatives of the parliament who choose the experts of the leadership, who appoints the leader according to his name , and the people should really

participate in different areas, not, for example, the parliament. you know that this is in conflict with the religious democracy. in fact, if the people are elected and the people choose , it is closer to the religious democracy . ken, maybe the representatives were actually the result of serving a certain spectrum and group , but when they are people, all people are involved, all spectrums, all factions, all political groups, many cultures are actually involved in the election of their president and as a decision the recipient can actually be their own president. they choose and their happiness is so much the future success of their country or, god forbid, the failure of their country can actually be involved. do you

agree with granting the government powers to the municipalities? yes, what is the advantage ? they are more familiar with the rules and regulations. are more aware. if there are these options , most of the decision-makers can consider more and more beautiful things in their decisions, for their own city , for their own city, and do you think in the field of foreign policy and cooperation with foreign countries? which countries should we prioritize? i would like to tell you that islamic countries and serving you are the country's priority , because we really have to act strongly in international diplomacy in such a way that we can have good and strong support for countries like qadha and palestine , and at the same time, we have relations with serving countries.

let me tell you europeans and let me tell you that those who actually have close relations with iran from an international point of view should be preserved so that i can use their capacities for our country, that is, you don't have much opinion on china and russia and so on. that's why the countries of china and russia actually iran is the country's partner. we should use the capacity of each country for afghanistan and pakistan, for example china and russia, because they are islamic, and not countries like china and russia, because they are actually islamic iran. we should use their capacities for our own national interests. that's enough ,

thank you very much, mr. bra, for your presence in this conversation. please give me a full schedule so that we can continue our conversation with another representative who will be contacted. dr. seyyed mohammad jamalian, place of birth of arak. date of birth 6th of february 1357. specialist degree. forensic medicine and poisons. place of residence in iraq. number of children. one child. constituency of arak kamijan and khonda. career records .

central province university of medical sciences, president of the educational and treatment center of hazrat wali asr of iraq, president of the central province university of medical sciences , tell me one outstanding law that you will follow up in the parliament to be implemented. in my opinion, if i enter the parliament , the most important thing that i will pursue is the issue of the housing boom law, which can be implemented by implementing it. a lot of mesh. the problems of the people, especially the dear youth , should be solved . do you agree with the transparency of the votes, gifts and letters of the mps? yes, i agree one hundred percent. one of the ways out of today's problems in our dear iran is transparency, which includes all matters related to the representative of the dear people. the three main problems of

the electoral field and their solution from the point of view. what are you the three issues that i want to plan for are poverty, unemployment and inflation. do you agree or disagree with increasing the retirement age? i say categorically, no, the government's debt to the funds pensions should be paid by the government, not from the pockets of retirees and working class. in addition , one of the problems of our society today is debate. there is youth unemployment, we need to be able to add dear young people to the field of serving the people much sooner with the same old pension law. should the salaries of workers and employees increase according to the rate of inflation or in proportion to it? well, i dare to say that the law of the islamic republic of iran is one of the progressive laws of the world. it is, but unfortunately

, this law has not been implemented correctly and completely for several years, according to the law, we must comply with inflation, let's increase the amount of wages and salaries in order to make bread, medicine and basic goods affordable to the people . do you agree with giving cheap dollars to importers and producers or giving subsidies to the people themselves? in my opinion, providing subsidies and payments. subsidy itself can be corrupting, that's why my opinion is that it should be paid directly to the people and other cases and experience we had in the past did not have a favorable result. should the gasoline subsidy be allocated to the national code of people or to the car? definitely to the national code. to rejuvenate and increase c.