but many believe that it cannot be compensated and that the inflation it creates is ultimately effective , of course, it is also a means of livelihood. it can be refused. very well, regarding the gasoline subsidy that you said, motagd should be allocated to the national code of people. if someone does not have a car, then what is the duty? yes. someone didn't have a car, so it will be deposited into their national code, which means they have to use it. when we say that it will be deposited into the national code , they actually benefit from can i use public means of commuting? no, i don't have a car. i have a national code. i don't have a car . yes, now i allocate a fuel share to my national code .

in any case, there is a card that can be charged like this. i don't even have a car to use . what is the use of this for me? well, i think it should be in the form of cash, so that you can actually use the vehicle. you can't use public means of communication , it is closer to justice than your service at all i will delete it because we don't have a means of transportation at all , which means that if someone doesn't have a means of transportation, cash will be added to his account . he should have cash in his account so that he can spend it elsewhere in the field of cash transportation. if he were to pour gasoline on him , he would have to choose whether he wants gasoline or money. instead of the parliament, it is the same mechanism that exists at the moment, that is, the people choose the president in the election . do it or your people, because

after all, the parliament is also the representatives of the people, what else? it doesn't matter whether the people choose or the representatives , well, it is closer to the religious democracy that we actually have, the people should choose, the people should participate , they should be involved in every election . in the discussion, even the assembly of leadership experts is represented in the same way. the assembly of experts chooses the leader, who appoints the leader based on his opinion, and the people should really participate in various changes, not that , for example, the assembly of representatives of the parliament chooses. you know this is in conflict with religious democracy. in fact, if the people are involved and the people choose , the religious salary is closer to the people . in fact, it

may have been the result of the service of a certain spectrum and group, but when it is the people, all the people are involved, all the spectrums, all factions, all political groups, many cultures are actually involved in the election of their president and can be a decision maker. in fact , choose their own president and be happy. do you agree with the granting of government powers to the municipalities? yes , what is the good of it, if it is in the area of ​​the islamic council, according to me. i worked in the city because they have more information about urban issues , they are more aware of the rules, rules and regulations.

if there are these powers, most of the decision-makers can consider the most beautiful and beautiful for their own city area, for their own urban area, and do you think that in the field of foreign policy and cooperation with foreign countries, which countries should you give priority to, islamic countries? and let me tell you the priority of the country, because we really have to act strongly in domestic and international diplomacy in such a way that we can provide good and strong support to countries like qadha and palestine. we should have and while i tell you about our relations with european countries, i would like to tell you that we should preserve those who actually have close relations with iran from an international point of view, so that we can use their capacities for our country, that is, you are very opinionated about china and russia why don't you have the countries of china and russia from actually partners. iran is the country. we

should consider each country's capacity for independence based on priority. if you want, you can say china and russia , for example, syria and iraq. saudi arabia, afghanistan , pakistan, for example , you would prefer china and russia, for example, because they are islamic, and not countries like china russia, because it is a syrian country, is actually an islamic country of iran, you should use the capacities you have for our own national interests . thank you very much, mr. bara. the representative with whom we will be in touch. dr. seyed mohammad jamalian, place of birth, iraq, date of birth, 6th of bahman 1357, degree of specialist in forensic medicine

and poisons, place of residence in iraq, number of children of a person. central province university of medical sciences, medical director of the provincial university of medical sciences central vice president of medical sciences university of central province, head of the educational and medical center of hazrat wali asr iraq. president of the central province university of medical sciences , tell me about a pending law that you will follow up in the parliament to be implemented. in my opinion, if i enter the parliament , the most important thing that i will pursue is the issue of the housing boom law, which can

solve many of the problems of the people, especially the young people . do you agree with the transparency of votes, gifts and letters of parliamentarians? i agree, one of your ways out of today's problems in our dear iran is transparency, which includes all cases it is related to the representative of the dear people. what are the three main problems of the constituency and their solution? the three issues that i want to plan for are poverty, unemployment, etc. is there inflation? do you agree or disagree with raising the retirement age? i must say no. government debt to pension funds should be paid by the government , not from the pockets of retirees and the working class. besides, one of the problems of our society today

is youth unemployment. we need it. with the same old pension law, we can bring dear young people to the field of serving the people much sooner let's add should the salaries of workers and employees increase according to the rate of inflation or in proportion to it? well, i dare to say that the law of the islamic republic of iran is one of the progressive laws of the world. but unfortunately , it has been several years that this law has not been implemented correctly and completely in accordance with the law. we should increase the amount of wages and salaries according to the inflation, so that bread, medicine and basic goods reach the people's hands cheaply . do you agree with giving cheap dollars to importers and producers, or giving subsidies to the people

themselves? it is corrupting because of this opinion my opinion is that it should be paid directly to the people and other cases and experience that we had in the past did not have a favorable result. should the gasoline subsidy be allocated to the national code of people or to the car? definitely to the national code. what support is needed to rejuvenate and increase the population? you see, if i want to summarize, i would like to offer you the fight against inflation, solving the unemployment problem and solving the housing problem. until we can not these materials. let's solve the issues , surely the problems of our youth will be solved in a linear way . how much should it be equal to the wage of the labor law, one third of the wage of the labor law

, half of the wage of the labor law, one third of the wage of the labor law , it must be equal to the wage of the labor law. it doesn't give anything. if any amount is less than this amount, it will surely cause problems for the families. we are fresh. we have to follow up the support packages and have a plan for it. do you agree or disagree with the removal of the entrance exam? i definitely agree with the removal of the entrance exam. in my opinion, the entrance exam is an unhealthy and unfair competition that is causing it now stress is in most families and we have to go according to it. not only the elimination of entrance exams, the educational system of san. our tradition is no longer an answer to the new generation against us, and changes must be made in it as well.

do you agree with car import? i definitely agree and will follow up on this matter. okay, now mr. seyyed mohammad jamalian, elected by the people of iraq, kamijan and khonda, from the central province studio, is with us in the conversation on the first page of salam and shabab. greetings to you and all dear viewers, i thank you for the opportunity you gave me and don't be tired. thank you, mr. jamalian. you said in this interview that was aired , you completely agree with the transparency of the votes of the representatives, the discussion of the gifts, the discussion of the letters of the representatives, many of the representatives, at least those who may be entering the parliament for the first time. i almost think that if you ask any of them , they all believe that there should be transparency.

but you know, i also know that after entering the parliament, conditions and conditions will arise , a conflict of interest may arise and challenge the discussion of transparency, and it will be very difficult to make a decision there. according to the knowledge you have about yourself, how much do you think you can do against this? resist the challenges and still act transparently , you can achieve this transparency. let's institutionalize it in the parliament . see, in my opinion, what is very important is our national interests, which should be prioritized over personal interests. today, the atmosphere of our society is really such that all people have this demand, whether from the elected officials or from the officials, who are honest with them. behave, today maybe people don't demand to do many things, but content. it is honesty and transparency, and anyway, just as

we swore to observe medical and professional ethics, i swore that until where i can really do my best for this transparency and honesty with the people and do my best so that, god willing, this important event will happen in this parliament if there is a conflict of interest. come and suppose that a resolution in the parliament needs your vote , which is not very compatible with the interests of the people of your constituency, but it will lead to national interests, for example, what will be your decision ? you should know and be aware of it . even during the corona crisis, when i was the president of the university, i really came to the conclusion that nothing is better than honesty. of course, dear people. my electorate also do not expect that national interests will be sacrificed for regional interests

, that is, we are all connected like a chain . however, they know that the stronger the country is , depending on that province and constituency, our electorate will also be stronger. a little bit ahead. and it will take a long time, but when the reason is explained to the people honestly, people will understand that they fully understand the situation and that national interests are of special importance to all of us, and my constituency will surely want the same. and a group, do you have no affiliation, you are not a debtor of a special flow that in any case, this conflict of interest will prevent your transparency. today, i am proud that i owe only the people of my constituency and all my efforts. i hope that, god willing, they will respond to the love of the people of the constituency . you said that

you are against raising the retirement age. perhaps many people's argument to defend this plan is that they believe that a young person who enters the labor market at the age of 25, for example , retires at the age of 55 . he has just reached his maturity period and can better share his experiences and his own productivity. the organization he is serving raise the tick to that experience, you think on the contrary, you don't believe in what we see in reality when we are over 25 years of working age. people's work goes by, their productivity decreases, maybe the person's work experience increases, but that productivity, risk-taking, and its usefulness for the device, in any case , decreases in terms of efficiency. on the other hand, in

the current situation, we have many young people who have high educational qualifications and are looking for work. what do you think is the solution to solve the problem of funds is there a pension? we have to strengthen the funds. let's see why they were in short supply today. while supporting us , we will make up for those deficiencies in the future. i don't think it is appropriate for us to put pressure on people. we are also lawyers who defend the people and we must defend the rights of the people. and you said that you believe that the salaries of workers and employees should increase according to the rate of inflation or in proportion to it. yes, yes , but at least regarding workers' salaries, you know that the determination of the minimum wage of workers' salaries is not much involved in the parliament, so what is the role of that council now

there is a tripartite that consists of workers and employers , there is no representative of the parliament who wants to have an effective vote. basically, how do you want the parliament to act on this? besides, the law also says that we have a supervisory role in the parliament according to the inflation rate. this is what we are talking about. anyway, the law has determined this, but unfortunately, when we come to the field of implementation, what is the law is not implemented due to various reasons. one of the roles of parliament members is the monitoring role. what i am saying is that the representatives should use their supervisory role to solve this problem for the workers. i our constituency is an industrial area and about 60% of our population is a working population. i touch and see labor problems with my skin and bones, and i know that it is my duty

to be the voice of this group and protect their rights. i will defend my duties, god willing, if the government's supervisory department also gives arguments and justifies the hardships it is facing and says that we don't want to go , it means we are suffering and you have more than specified the possibility of this increase. for example, it does not exist. solve it. well, see, this goes back to your first question, which is a discussion of interests somewhere else it is a nation that comes as you say. they say that the budget does not work, we can't do it anymore. anyway, it is a matter of national interests, but in any case , the people expect the representatives to be persistent. if it is national, surely the people will understand as

they have understood in the past few years, but in order to know that their elected representative understands, and they expect this , we are doing our duty. in the end , the decision will be based on national interests, and this is more . it is a red line and everything below it anyway we have to act, while in my opinion, if it is possible, we can ask the government with solutions such as support packages on a quarterly basis , if this implementation is possible now. it doesn't have the law and anyway we can't implement the law correctly by giving support packages to take this pressure off the working class and the weak, this is our art to be able to design alternative ways that both sides will benefit their interests anyway. i think what you are saying is

that the design is the same as what it is now , it does not make much difference. well, whatever, man he should try based on the fact that there is no budget when you say that there is no budget , doesn't putting the government in debt help the issue? you have to pay by removing the subsidy. do you agree with the rich and the rich? one hundred percent. and do you think that this is close to the justice of your argument? ok. you see, today we are living in a situation where there are weak tithes in the society, our resources are also limited, when resources

are limited, management should be one of the methods. this is management so that we can really remove those people who have financial resources and can manage themselves anyway, but help the lower deciles. that many people in the society are completely free to refuse to receive their own subsidy. in the current situation where we have limited resources, i think it is justice, but if there is a time when the financial resources are not enough, all citizens have the right to in any case, the society itself will benefit, but in the current situation, we should think about the bottom tenth of the society , and if we don't do this, we will be far from justice. in the current situation, in my opinion, it is justice to deal

with the lower tithe. well, in this situation, a person who is rich may say, sir, that i did not take advantage of, for example, government benefits or national wealth that i did not benefit from, to reach this wealth, it was my own effort. aras has reached me. or in any other way, why should i not benefit from this subsidy like others, for example, as a citizen? are you kidding me, our life is social, when the weak tenths of the society cannot meet their own needs, by the way, a lot of isolated and social events happen that will harm the benefited class. as much as the government it can benefit the weaker sections of the society , certainly the upper sections from a social and spiritual point of view. he is mentally calmer. today, when i leave my house, as a doctor, my financial situation is acceptable, i see that my fellow citizens are at the level of garbage

and he is doing this to earn his living . that day is not a good day for me, so i of course, i am socially and morally satisfied not to receive but not to see these faces. seeing working children, seeing social isolation, divorces that are happening because of problems. these all affect us as a community and me i am sure that every citizen does not honestly think that in such a situation , it is not my right to take helpers. do you think this is from our iranian culture? in the discussion of basic goods, bread, medicine, the method that prescribes that the preferential dollar

should be given to the importer so that it can be imported at a lower price and people will use it. like what happened now, and with our subsidy, we can compensate for the gap that exists so that people will be very do not pressure them if we want to be scientific. let's look at the issue, the preferential rate should be removed and paid directly to the people, but today what we see are those people who are now consumers of these basic goods anyway, that is their wallet or payment from their pocket with what is considered as a subsidy. they understand that there is no age at all in the field of medicine, which i am currently involved in. i see guaranteed patients. in any case, we have many economic problems due to the high cost of medicine. we have to pay people

, but with a correct implementation method, we always implement of course, we always fail to implement the law correctly, it causes that good law to be abandoned or objected to. if we can reach that particular group in a proper way, the best way is to give the subsidy directly to companies themselves can cause corruption, which we have experience with. very well, you think about the phenomenon of hijab , what other solutions can be effective in addition to cultural solutions. the sound is cut off, you have my voice, mr. jamalian, yes, yes, you have my voice , yes, very good

there is an end to the program. regarding the hijab issue , it was one of the most challenging debates, whether in the parliament or outside the parliament, as someone who represents the people, what is your opinion about the phenomenon of the hijab, and in the discussion of the hijab issue , what other solutions are there to separate cultural activities ? what suggestions do you make? look at the hijab. in my opinion, it's really a debate. it is our religious belief, first of all , it is emphasized in terms of our law and sharia, but in order for the implementation of this law, and in any case, something that is our sharia prejudice, to be implemented correctly, it is like other laws, we must we have the right solutions. we are facing a new generation that is certainly in terms of discourse creation and

so on. it is much better to remember to interact and accept them than to try to find a domineering state or our strict laws from the 80s and 90s . we are strict, i think we will get a photo answer. and in the discussion of the entrance exam, you mentioned that you are against the entrance exam. in fields that are highly competitive and have limited capacity, what mechanism is there so that people can sit on those seats and get accepted in those fields. well, look at the entrance exam, well, one of the big stresses is that the conditions of the entrance exam day, the testing method , all of these are factors other than the talent and

capabilities of that person, which makes a person enter a certain field, that is, a person has a correct testing method. ok, in addition to the efforts he has made, he is much more successful than a person who may be smarter with more effort and does not have the necessary conditions for the test that day . his diploma and grade point average and anyway remove the new educational method of entrance exam. this has happened in many countries of the world. anyway, let's put the competition on the basis of the achievements that the person has during his studies, not just with an entrance exam. now, these can be based on different weights and measures, including the

current grade point average. the conditions that a person is interested in and whether he/she has the capabilities of that field of interest and other options require a well-considered master's work, but in my opinion, by removing the entrance exam , we can have fairer conditions for people to enter fields. let's guide them to know well, we have 30 seconds less than terran, very short in the field of foreign policy, what is the most important priority in your opinion, mr. jamali? look at the foreign policy, in my opinion, by maintaining the upstream documents and the existing emphasis, we can expand our interactions as much as we can , we will be more productive in the economic fields as well as in the scientific, educational and equipment fields.

we must improve our interactions with the countries of the world by maintaining the upstream documents and the red lines drawn by the system . you watched this conversation, have a good night and god bless you. at 40:00, the head of the judiciary , the officials in charge of reducing road accidents could not fully fulfill their duties.