tehran, 30 experts from the engineering system, 30 doctors, or at all, they should start a movement. he said that we do not accept the party movement at all. we are made up of experts from doctors, engineers, lawyers and various groups. it is not necessary that there be a party at all, not a two -part electoral system in the country . if you want to treat the entire country in the same way, then it will be the proportional system of the province that was approved in the 10th majlis in the 10th majlis.

your personality is your strength, so that many parties with different views accept you.

we are dividing the majority . is it possible to deal with two electoral systems in one country ? look at the fact that the guardian council happened to disagree with the constitution and sharia. if you look at the law, when the guardian council accepts it, it says that it is in the human domain. geographical politics means that this law should cover all the people of this society and cover the geography of this country and include the political factors of this collection . explain that there are different laws. for example, we make a law about science, we make laws about the so -called villages, we make laws about the cities , and we make laws about the so-called disabled people. what is different is that you want one in relation to people who are dissolved in relation to a certain stratum in the society

, or in a city, for example, they may say in tehran , sir, from 30 to 5, what do you mean by the term tehran? each district has one representative, then they say 25 of them are chosen proportionally in these different countries of this system well, i ask you a question , give me an answer and let my people and viewers know that we are saying that we want the parties to be institutionalized in the country first, this is a basis and discussion for proportional elections. to convince means

to enact a law that the provincial elections are proportional in the whole country. in the law, it can be implemented that the elections in the country are provincial , and there is no place in the country where they are not implemented in a proportional manner , and the law covers the entire geographical area of ​​the country . mr. kazami, look at the tenth parliament. to convince the friends in the committee of councils and parliament about three to four articles. i wrote, by the way, about fars, about khorasan, about tehran , my assumption was that we have 100 voters, for example, in fars, we have 18 representatives , we have 15 constituencies, the constituencies of shiraz have four representatives, the rest of the constituencies had only one representative , what is the system here? proportionality of a province, a city, a city, then

, by the way, i came up with a so-called example of how the voters choose how exactly the so-called representatives of the constituency. the city of our main district becomes the province of our sub-districts in fars. what are the 15 districts, some of which are single? there are some representatives, some representatives, that is a model. in my opinion, maybe that model is desirable. now, the discussions that i had in the commission at the beginning of the discussion of proportionality, we went to the commission and we talked, and there were two or three stages of discussion, even in one discussion you said that we do this. in the end, we will go in that direction, let me say that we have not prepared anything until the end, why should we go and enact a law, then we will go, we will say come, now that hazrat ali, we have time to work on the issue of proportionality in the provincial discussion, let us convince the councilors, the issue of the parties

in the commission is ours. for example, we are a party how many members do we have in this country? we have a party . we also have a party. we all have a party in that country . let's talk about the parties and their roles. we prepared to go to the law of proportional elections , the law of proportional elections that the whole geography. cover the country, but this is for me to come to the country and say, excuse me, tehran should be proportional, mashhad should be proportional, but the whole country is one hundred, and for example , how many constituencies, we have 20 constituencies, how many constituencies do you cover, 200 constituencies , that's it again majority system i mentioned that

the most desirable system in my opinion is the proportional system of the shahristan province which covers the whole country. iran is like this because you have 299 representatives right here. my representatives look at you and what is your situation. typically, the representatives owe their so-called election to themselves . they know what the problems are with local issues. they have nothing to say. you know that if it is built in the province, let them vote because they don't have the right to say what they have to say. i see exactly the difference here. it's more important than the city , why don't we solve it. the chance of getting this plan voted in the parliament is low. my reason is that you should look. you have 110 single-representative constituencies, which are usually single- representative constituencies of people on local disputes, for example, tui the cities say what is the so-called worst person in our own city. i don't know the best

. when these looks exist, you have to act in such a way that a plan you want to take to the parliament has a chance to be brought to the parliament. mr. qadri, i apologize mr. qadri. in the discussion of the elections of his own city, he should win in the competition in benida, his own city, and be ahead of them in the city. this will be the province

of the city. he says that we can also leave our own city look at the province where we have a provincial seat. if the election model is a majority model , you will see that in one province, all the votes are from one faction and the other faction. when should i refer to the province, but if so. proportionality is a combination of two factions. yes, if you want to make a province , you can make it a city-proportional province, not a city-proportional province, a majority city. we say, for example, in tehran, we have a list a and a list b , it is true that list a will actually win all 30 seats in the majority system. the people of tehran

give each list, for example, they give 20% to a , 80 to b, list a should approve 20% of the seats , and the list has more than 80. now, my question is, you are second to list a. yes, the top of list a is second to list b. the top of this is less than the bottom of that. how do you want the people who directly voted for me to go to my list, and i , who is below our list, for example, 400,000 voters, to the top of the list, whose top is, for example, 300,000 voters, for example, how do you want to give poison to 300 people? at if you think that there are 400 people, you have to judge by the criteria of the majority . iran

, the majority is not like that. second, the rule of the minority is for the majority in tehran. or stream a, so-called, have 20 % tendency to stream b, let stream a come, so to speak , introduce 5 firsts instead of one first, this 80 is the negative of that 20%, and you will be coherent as the issue.

now, for example, a respected representative who came from a constituency with low participation or a small population , for example, with 5 thousand votes, for example, became a representative with a a representative who , for example, has 500,000 one million votes, their votes are actually the same, and they can vote in all the laws, that in all the majority systems , this is for the people, it is definitely

not required to choose all of them from the first , so what happens with recognition, like now that now it is a good person to come and do something exactly , but look, mr. kazemi is pointing out that one person is right now. what is the so-called in a list where the vote is from the last person to the first, this list is from the last, yes, look here, you are exactly talking about the fact that you want to give seats to lists according to the weight of their votes, there may be some cases. if not, we want to convince the people to vote, and they have the right, and we are in tehran or a big city, which, for example, includes a proportional system. now suppose that we

create an electoral system with two, one, for example, a majority, one, for example, proportionality, for example, yes, well, you , the people who vote. 400,000 people against this list , we want to remove 5 people with 400,450,000 voters at the top of that list with 300,000 voters , you want to replace it with 45,000 people. you have the same problem. majority view do you have a proportional system, don't you? look for a moment, what is your answer now in the 10th election , 57 people of tehran voted for the reformists , 30 seats were given to the reformists , of course, 367 . when it comes to tehran, the 6th parliament, all the reformists, the 7th, the 8th , the 9th, all the fundamentalists, the 10th parliament, all the reformists in the parliament, oh, we all go the other way, they say that i don't have a job, i

'm going to be a voter, for example, i'll attend the election, i'll vote, i'm looking for this or my party either i or we can convince the majority of them to vote for, for example, our list vote for the person who got 400,000,450,000 votes . i have a question for you. in our majority system , it is not the absolute majority that is above 51. in my constituency, it is close to 20 percent . i apologize. those who get more than 20% of votes, those who get more than 20% are not eligible

for example, someone above 20% cannot be a representative at all , because we said in our law, at least 20% of them say that the election is for a list in tehran . 60% of people vote for another list . the lowest and the lowest vote of those 30 people on the first list should be even less, but not the first less, the first less, i apologize for the separation , mr. qadri, our person at the top of the list gets 60% of the deserved votes, right, no, not the top.

independently, for example, 10%, 10% will be 30 seats in tehran , 3 to that one will be 40, and 12 will be three and 12 15 can be 50%, they can be 50% related to this work, mr. qadri , our system is based on

justice

. in fact, now it has been agreed with the duality of the election method , now we want to say that iran is only in tehran, and it is going to be held proportionally. we lived completely with this proportional election system in joint stock companies we are familiar with things. second, the so-called " guardian" has come to check iranadat and its problems exactly. thirdly , it reduces advertising costs. if i am on the list, i don't want to go solo anymore, then solo work, which doesn't have many topics. thirdly, the next discussion that exists after i am elected, people, exactly, if i am from a list, i will try to strengthen this list together. now in the majority system, people

stick to each other like with their own heads until the elections. it is over, they will start attacking, but if not, this will happen he wants to turn his minority into a majority in the next term, he wants to increase his share in the stream of the majority. what is the term exactly because he knows that there is a next period, but in order to make his contribution more , he must have tolerance with each other, we will not destroy each other anymore , dr. qadir , i have a question. now there are both independents and now there are groups of list a, and god willing , these will be aggregated and the total percentage will be determined based on the total votes, according to now, well , independently, maybe there are more of them, there is a problem. no, as a rule, the total number of votes of independents is more than the votes of farsta, so it should be like this . look at every 30 people from you as independents. in tehran , 10,000 people may vote as independents in order to have a list

. therefore, independents must appear with a list, not individuals. independently pointed out that they can form a third list for themselves, or that there are 100,000 independent people in the red and blue lists in tehran . it is contrary to meritocracy, which means that even though meritorious people have dignity and status, if they do not fit in this proportional format, they will not have a place in the system.

they don't have our elections. one thing is that the same point i made, for example, we say that at least 20% of the people's votes to win the representative position with this proportional system , which mr. qadiri could not convince me, is that with his proportional system, it is less than 20%. one is the duality in legislation that we want to run the country in two ways in the electoral system of the parliament , which in my opinion creates problems in the country , kazemi, look, all your questions have been answered, you can now go to any text or in the truth of any so-called article or book related to the electoral system, tell me sir which system is the fairest electoral system

? they will immediately ask you in front of the camera, let's say that a city has 2 representatives, 3 to 3 people, 3 lists, 3 parties, how do you want a proportional system in these two seats?

ok, but one person cannot be in two lists. each person in one of your lists in one city of your constituency may have 2 representatives, for example , we have 200 nominated participants, 50 coalition coalitions, what exactly is here, but here you are because anyone he drew lots from his blood turkey said that the voting floor for each dissent is 10% . what do some countries say? 5. the three

that we brought, you said three shares of one seat, exactly, this is precisely so that there will not be so much wastage, for example, in tehran, let's not have 100 losses , not 50 losses, our 2-3-4 losses, 5 losses, because they know the number the losses have increased, if they do not reach the floor of the vote with their candidates like the independent candidates of mr. qadri, we have a minute until the end of the program, considering that we started with you , you should give your support.

its compliance with the constitution with the explanation of all this has been accepted by the diagnostic assembly . by the way, you also went to the diagnostic assembly. these issues were not the problem, there were other ambiguities. if you had the chance, what exactly is the so-called complete plan that all iranians have answered? thank you, mr. dr. qadir, mr. p. one minute is yours and one minute is for us . it is a question of justice, that the military system is based on justice. there is a contradiction with the shahs, one of them is that mr dear mr. qadri, he says, for example , let's take the quorum lower, it is no longer a representative of the people, with 10% of my representative below, let me allow one, this, one , the duality of the implementation of the election law in the country in a dual way.

he took 30 objections and ambiguities to this. the general policies of the electoral system announced by the supreme leader that i can't convince the public opinion of the society until this is resolved in iran. 105 countries of the world

we are being implemented . we have some so -called internalization . we will start looking for another medal for iran in the continuation of the tournament which is being hosted by the uae. last night , amir jafari won the silver medal in the 65 kg category with a weight of 23 kg. earlier, mohsen bakhtiar in the 59 kg category and ahmad aminzadeh in the positive category, 17 kilos and ali akbar gharib shahi the 17 kg group won the gold medal. hamed salehipour in the category of 97 kilos and soul.