stand up for justice, the burden of trust is left on your shoulders, stand up in the first line, the first line, the first line, the line of service, the line of humanity. sanger is you, sanger is you, this is the table , and there is hope for you, on the other side of the table, there is a martyr in your eyes, in the name of god, hello , good night, dear viewers of the first page program , we offer your presence and tonight we are the host of mr. dr. mansour ali mardani, elected by the people of abhar khormadreh and soltaniyeh, before starting the conversation, i invite you to

watch his interview during the election campaigns, and after the questions of this conversation, which you will see, we will ask questions and further explain the answers to the questions of mansour ali mardani, the place of birth. parchin was born on july 8, 1351 and earned a degree in infectious diseases. specialization from shahid beheshti university of medical sciences and master's degree in management from tehran university. residence abhar city. number of children. one. career records . responsible of abbas abad safala health center from 1379 to

1381. for 2 years. social security of shahid soleimani fakal, scientific point of infectious diseases in abhar khormadreh and kedar hospitals since 2005, head of infection control committee of regional hospitals since 2005 the election of abhar soltanieh and khormadreh is a separate law. it remains to say that you will follow up in the parliament to be implemented. consumer rights protection law. do you agree with the transparency of votes, gifts and letters of mps or not? i totally agree with the transparency about the letter and gifts. but about the transparency of votes, if it causes the representative to lose courage. it is not very good and i agree

that workers' and employees' salaries should increase according to the rate of inflation or in proportion to it . increase should the gasoline subsidy be allocated to the national code of people or to the car? i prefer the national code. how much should the pension of a four-person family covered by the relief and welfare committee when the head of the family is disabled be equal to the wage of the labor law 2/3 of the wage of the labor law half of the wage of the labor law one third of the wage of the labor law the wage of the labor law under the paragraph and this itself salary is a cause for concern and we should

consider the basis based on the poverty line and livelihood . the higher education budget should be for all 3 million students of the country or for 400 thousand daily government students. the budget will reduce the quality of education, but if we don't have any restrictions, preferably, education should be free and for everyone . do you agree with the capital id tax, if this tax if it is non-productive, yes, but if it is productive, no , do you agree with importing cars? yes, i agree, because it causes domestic car manufacturers to compete with them, and the quality of national cars can increase, and if the quality of national cars increases, they can export and export. it will bring value to the country.

okay, dr. ali mardani, what made you come to the conclusion that you as a representative people, can you serve more as a specialist doctor, especially to the people of your constituency, in the name of allah, the most merciful, first of all , i would like to say hello to the dear and grateful viewers and thank the noble people of abhar khormadreh and soltanieh for trusting their little child. giving me this opportunity to serve more. as a doctor, i swore not to be indifferent to anything that endangers people's health. there are many issues that endanger people's health, such as the industry that produces unfit cars, such as roads that are not up to standard.

they are not, especially in rural areas and remote areas , and education causes stress and tension. varzi, who uses a lot of chemical coatings and has not been expert on them and their expert opinion has not been applied , i could feel people's problems during our visit, and i felt that there are solutions to solve these problems that are not too complicated and expensive. not for the sake of the government. i just decided to enter the field of elections, maybe i can do something for the people for the country, if we base it on the medical profession, which means many doctors in general, should express their position. parliament representative or if no one came, he acted against his oath , no, it's not against

, they consider it more useful in your work , you didn't consider it more useful, i can be more effective, you mentioned about transparency. if the transparency of the representatives' votes does not lead to taking their courage, it is good, but if you disagree with it, yes, does it really take the courage of the representatives? yes, transparency can cause caution in some places. it will have an effect on your relationships, i said maybe personal relationships you don't mean relationships. to be created in the work, maybe in any case, relations now have a place in iran next to the rules, maybe if it doesn't have a place more than the rules, it doesn't have a place less, so some methods should be investigated more and experts should comment on

how much effect this has on the change of votes. and whether the vote will ultimately benefit the nation and the country or not. well, if that is the case, it can also happen with, for example, gifts and letters , that is, you may receive a gift from somewhere and then cast the vote you want, for example, if even if there is a conflict of interest, there is also transparency there you are not, so the effect of transparency there may be for the benefit of the people at the expense of the individual, but it is for the benefit of the people as a representative when you vote for an approved plan .

in general, if it reduces the courage of the representatives , it is not good. it has no effect on me. well, how can a representative lose his courage under the shadow of the transparency of his regime? i don't have a problem myself, i always explained everything clearly, if in the previous interview, when the property was higher, the plan was higher , that is to say how much you have brought, mention the amount. i said that i am not against transparency, but i said that in general, because this proposal

has not been voted on many times, i feel that some people fear that their relations will be disturbed or the transparency of votes. not voting for this matter will cause some disruption in their communication with others, while i said in everyone's slogan, we agree, so don't you think that a part of these rents is my goal. it creates, in relation to the parliament, sometimes you have always seen that, for example, the representatives later interfere in the appointment of the managers of the sub-categories or finally get involved in things that are basically related to the representation and the parliament does not have the same lack of transparency that you are saying, sir, it takes courage. doesn't it cause the same rounds that have been created by the complaining? you, i mean, now we will clarify your first opinion. from your position, what you said in that interview is the same whether you have returned now or not. no, i didn't go back, i said, and i'm going to say it again, i completely

agree, but considering that a large number of representatives voted against this in the past, i have a retrospective discussion in this field, because i saw the history of not voting, so i thought. the reason is that they don't have the courage to clarify their opinions they should do it because their rent will decrease. well, because the rent will decrease, they will not be able to do this. otherwise, i am personally not against it, because it is possible that if we use this as the basis, there have been many approvals and plans in the parliament where the representatives may have voted wrongly. he said that because he already voted negative, so we are also in total agreement with this group.

it should not diminish their courage , we have no problem from that point of view, i myself will be clear because if i enter the parliament, i am going to speak both as a supporter and as an opponent, there is no question about this at all. you said if it causes the representative to lose his courage they gave us a little time and at that time it was supposed that if you go to the parliament and this plan will be met again, your vote is positive , it means that there should be transparency. i also had 1 billion 350 million financial sponsors. no

, do you agree or disagree with raising the retirement age? the quality of their work is lower and the efficiency is lower they create less. on the one hand , pension funds have the problem of managing financial resources that do not fit with their accounts. these accounts are not only for iran. there is something like this all over the world. if our management is not correct , we should not punish the insurer, we should

provide the resources, as we all experts consider inflation as a kind of hidden tax, which means that the reduction in the purchasing power of people's money has gone into the government's pockets, so the government is obliged to compensate for those shortcomings or else. . if the inflation was not so high and the hidden tax that the government collected from the people would not be so high as a rule, pension funds did not declare bankruptcy or deduct balance or financial resources, and this is due to mismanagement, and that management should be corrected and provided by it, not by insurers . and pay longer or more insurance

premiums to reduce the effect of mismanagement. a person who reaches the retirement age, for example, in our country , is suffering, for example, at the age of 50, 50, and so on. eh this is his young age, which means that he is a human being who has an experience and by the way , he can be very effective now, so he can still work , why should he retire. what we are saying is that the retirement age is not the same for everyone . you are the ones who now have a higher education and are studying until the age of 24. there are not that many jobs. our unemployment rate is not low. there are many people who

can find a suitable job at the age of 27. if they don't, they will retire at the age of 50. they started working in the factories until now they either retired or are in the process of retiring and this law will not be a precedent for us and it is far from justice for us to pay insurance premiums for 30 years and work for 35 or 40 years or the insurance premiums should be lower. should they increase the industries from this, or if insurance premiums are to be paid in this way according to the accounting standards in insurance and pension affairs , it should continue like this until the end, that is, if they are going to retire with this insurance premium in 30 years. they should retire after 30 years if

they have hard and unprofitable work and double insurance premium for jobs. it is hard and harmful to receive it after 25 years they should retire for 20 years based on their coefficient, not to pay a longer amount and for a longer time . this is a kind of reaching into people's pockets, and i personally do not agree with this, mr. doctor. do you think that these points you are making now, for example, are about increasing the retirement age? that should not happen, something that has already been approved. how basically do the representatives have the power to make this change ? will you be the representative who is waiting for the bill and plan from the other representatives or from the government, so that you can vote yes or no now or not yourself to resolve this issue? you plan things you are active, you collect signatures, you contribute, in any case, people are mostly not satisfied with this law, and

the people's representatives are responsible. prepare a plan and get the necessary signatures so that it can be proposed in the public stage and it will either be voted on or not . i will definitely be one of those who will design this plan and get signatures from the rest of the colleagues. how far can the parliament play its supervisory role? do it and see where is the border of this supervision with interference in executive work. i have a definition for supervision . we have the upstream documents, vision document 1404. we have the 5-year development plans and

the general policies of the system, if we have these as the basis for development in any matter , then the general managers and ministers should plan in this direction to reach that defined position, and when they plan, as a rule the timetable is also with the program and can be monitored, and this monitoring is the monitoring that we can do through reporting and how many of those programs have been realized. or how many of them have not been realized, we can apply our supervision because the basis of supervision is the good implementation of the law and the things that should have been done, i am the representative. let me introduce a person and say that for any reason, this gentleman should be the head of a certain institution, the head of a certain

department, or the general manager of a certain place. dismissal is necessary, but it worked and that someone could not fully fulfill his responsibility, and you should warn the managers above them, this is no longer interference, this is supervision, you have a weak and weak manager , you are removing him from the system, the system that he could not do was inefficient and he could not fulfill those expectations and those plans and those rules correctly and meet the expectations. we will definitely look for such a method and based on the upstream documentation from the manager.

if they have a problem or a legal problem that should be solved through the parliament , they should definitely be removed and what tools and mechanisms do you think exist so that the representative cannot abuse the monitoring mechanism that has been defined. because it was sometimes heard that in the past, for example, some people have heard this thing now, that a number of representatives, for example , had a request from a ministry that was unreasonable, for example, an excuse to install a person in a position in an office and then the ministry didn't comply, and then they threatened to censure if you didn't comply. what kind of mechanism can be defined so that these incidents did not happen? transparency should not be only in votes. we believe that transparency should be everywhere. ok, that is, if the plasco building is on fire , burning and killing many people, then the municipality or the engineering system organization will come and announce that i

have warned this 10 or 20 times before, this is not acceptable, and this should be done. tell the people that if a place has been warned 10 times, they should make it clear to the people that this building has these problems, which means clarification when it becomes a law. if it becomes legal, it should be everywhere, and the ministry of home affairs should be transparent let him tell the parliament and the group that is in charge of the system of monitoring the representatives, both through the presidency of the parliament and through the commission of article 90 of the constitution, they can announce these things and even complain. the existing legal mechanism seems to have the will to do it. . it's not me, don't you think that those who were in the parliament before you also believe in the same things, but when they go to the heart of the matter , they see that there are requirements and expediency

that push them back from what everyone there are always such possible things, but we have to accept that the one who swore from the interests of the people should not deviate from the law , they should stick to their oaths, and if they don't do this , it's a problem of their own. it could be that how a representative who, for example, enters the parliament for 4 years, has certain rights.

i don't agree with this at all. what makes this happen to me or others? now you, who were less in number, but in general you can understand. i was 15 years old. i went to the front. they say, "go to the meme , i was going to the meme, now i have come to go to the meme, that is, the income of a specialist doctor in our city is maybe 20 times the income of the parliament . if we want to do something for our country, we have to sacrifice ourselves a little. i came to sacrifice myself for the sake of the people." we survived for the sake of the country , we survived the corona virus, we stayed with the work of the people. i was in the hospital for 3 years, i even

worked 22 hours a day, and as with our friends, colleagues, many of our friends lost their lives because of this. serve the people because of the loss of our martyrs that to the country let them serve. we have to give up our property. i didn't come to sew a bag for myself. i reported all my property and i believe that it should be spent to build the country. in the end, no matter what was said in the parliament , their intention was really to steal their property from the owner, but i don't know their intention. i can't read it, but i came with these intentions. i am willing to give you success, mr. doctor. the issue of workers' rights was also brought up in the interview. this is proportional to the inflation rate

i believe that we can control inflation . why shouldn't we control it? after all, workers' salaries are much lower than the number defined for the poverty line . . if he works multiple shifts, this will increase unemployment . a worker who doesn't want to go to sleep hungry, anyway , he has to work, he has to have an income, and this income is not enough to make a living, not to make a living, to get married, to provide housing for his livelihood, we must be like this. and we have to let's define the salary so that a

person can provide the minimum for his own life and this is the custom all over the world. we can provide examples and models that have been implemented in other countries, which are available to us as a model and we can use them. for me, it makes no sense for the government to come and define the poverty line, for example, 18 million, 20 million to define the minimum wage, 7 million, how can we solve this disharmony? we want to justify whether the government wants to give them a difference in subsidies, it wants to implement a socialist economy, in any case, it

is the responsibility of the government and employers to provide the basic needs of a family in any way, and if this does not happen, we will we are moving towards regress every day. well, now, for example, you tell me, this year, i want to determine the workers' salaries . what do you think should be the basis ? the basis should be the poverty line, that is, the minimum that is paid on the basis of which the line should be consistent with it. have , but you know that the representative and an interventionist assembly it is not in this matter, but no matter how the budget comes , it will be approved in the parliament, and the representatives also, yes, the budget comes , but it is always in this tripartite organization that they decide, that is, it is, but anyway, the representatives approve that something like this be paid. from the point of view that the representatives

approve how it will be paid and what amount it will be paid, we can vote against what has come. from now on, your path is clear in the parliament, what you want to do, exactly which commission you have chosen. health and treatment health and treatment is the most important thing in what do you think should happen to the health and treatment commission? our health expenses are much higher than international standards and many things are not in place . we do not study management at all and do not know management , they are chosen as managers just because they are doctors , and they always reinvent the wheel from scratch

. we have a lot of resources in this field to monitor drug import, drug distribution and possible corruption and very low possible rent we should be able to activate the titech system , create trust in that system, oblige the government to modify the appearance of the titech system a little bit, so that it is user-friendly . please, at the end of your representation period, if anything happens from your position in the health and treatment commission, you will be satisfied with yourself that what i wanted was reduced.