in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. greetings to you. announced by the end of march, according to mr. khandozi , the process of depositing the necessary resources for the purchase of shares born in 1401 has been completed by the program and budget organization of the stock exchange organization. the minister of economy also asked the parents of these babies to refer to the national window of e-government services by the end of this year. and

register. in this process, as soon as registration is done, automatic and electronic procedures are carried out for the allocation and deposit of one and a half million tomans of shares for 1401 babies. the glass hall passed the last week with the positive performance of the indices. the rest experts in the event of an increase in the value of transactions, this process can. to be continued. glass hall finished the second week of march with a positive performance of both the total and the position indicators. in this week , the total index was able to register a growth of 5.4 percent in its portfolio within 5 working days. the total index of the stock market started to increase in the range of 2 million 45 thousand units from the first of the week and we now see that it has reached the range of 2 million 190 thousand units. it is very likely that if the value of transactions

is fixed above 7 thousand billion tomans, and above this, in fact, we will be able to see the value in the coming week. let's cross this range and move towards 2 million, 2990 and 2 million 300. the homus indicator , which shows the effect of all trading symbols and the face of the market in a more favorable way , experienced a growth of 34% . range. if this range is broken up, our next vision is around 770,000 units. the volume of transactions in the past week reached an average of more than 10 billion shares and financial bonds. the value of khurd transactions was more than 6 thousand billion tomans on average daily. but the reception of index-making and export-oriented symbols in the second week of march increased and pal.

these symbols were the crown jewels of the issue that became available so that after a few weeks more than 1600 billion tomans of real money were injected into the market and finally the real money reconciled the market. one of the most important events that happened was that the rate of refineries may be announced for 5 years. this was also a very positive news because it had previously caused the market to fall, and it was also about the export tax on mineral metal products, which was two percent, as they said. it will be deleted for now and one there was a series of events such as the suspension of the issuance of 30% sofardeh bonds, which had a negative effect on the market in the last week or two . experts believe that the market will not grow significantly until the end of the year, and in the last weeks of the year , the saudi market trend . ghazal arab gol

, the central depository company of uraq wahadar securities announced the names of the companies that did not deposit the dividends of adalat shares to the accounts of this company. also, 3 companies have not taken any action so far they did not deposit their equity dividends in the first and second stages. according to the previous announcement, on march 25th , the second phase of adalat's dividend will be paid. however, if these companies do not deposit the interest of equity holders to the accounts of the central depository company at the appointed time, the payment of the second stage of interest will be disturbed. process. market management in

the stock exchange and over-the-counter market will be reformed. the director of stock exchange supervision of the stock exchange organization announced the pathology and proposals related to the reform of market management operations and emphasized: we must move in a direction where publishers, major shareholders and financial institutions with solutions similar to the market development fund can optionally equip resources for market management operations. according to masoumi khangah, in this process, the way to manage the assets of publishers and major shareholders, whose marketing activities are optional, will be clearly defined and clarified. the transactions of kish export hall are transferred to tehran in the last days of the year and the beginning of the new year. according to the announcement of the iran commodity exchange market operations management, due to the arrival of nowruz

, all transactions of the kish export hall from 26 march to 15 april 143 with the tit kish trading system and through brokers' offices in tehran. according to this announcement, the deposit of funds for the settlement of export contracts must still be done through kish's operational accounts. today, more than 66 thousand tomans of hydrocarbon products are sold on the supply board of the iran energy exchange. the largest volume of supplies is dedicated to heavy and solvent kerosene. in the internal hall of the energy exchange, more than 50.

in the past, we saw the sale of all kinds of products worth more than 2120. it was 9 billion tomans. commodity exchange announced the launch of two future contracts for silver and precious saffron. according to the announcement of the contract commodity exchange ati saffron negin will be launched on sunday, march 20, with delivery of november 143, and it can be traded until november 28 of the next year. also, the silver futures contract will be delivered in july 143 from monday, march 21. it will be negotiable. future contracts start on the first trading day with no price fluctuation limit with a pre-opening period of 30 minutes at the beginning of the trading session. the base price of the contract

is the same price discovered in the single-price auction. iran commodity exchange company accepts goods and products. new in the main and secondary markets of this company. according to the announcement of the acceptance management of the iran commodity exchange it has been agreed to accept five new products from four companies, such as aluminum ingots, tirahan, steel milligrade steel ingots, polyethylene terephthalate and bottle terephthalate in the main market of the commodity exchange. also, the product of steel scrap, trans and industrial oil, battery waste, chemicals, two hotels. and 6 business units were accepted in the sub-market of the commodity exchange. the acceptance of these goods and products was approved on march 15 this year after reviewing the documents in the 4th and 9th meeting of the supply committee. depositing money to the brokerage account must

be done through the card and bank account of the individuals themselves. according to the head of the anti-money laundering center of the organization stock exchange this decision with. prevention of misuse of people's bank and stock accounts has been taken. bye. thank you for your companionship. the iranian coach, sharaf iran, is

playing with a telegram across the country, why in this month of pricing , your question is an interesting question , we don't want a football manager. anywhere here in our studio, mrs. zahra saeedi mubarakeh, the elected representative of the people of isfahan in the mubarakeh district , as the opposition, and mr. ali babaei karnami , the elected representative of the people of mazandaran, sari miandrod district , as the agreeer, and god bless both guests of the program, i would like to start with mrs. saeedi do and this question that they basically disagree with. by removing the high-earning assistants, where does it come from and what is the reason? in the name of god, i offer my greetings, courtesy and respect to you

, dear colleagues, good and noble people of the islamic republic of iran. the main issue is that we call this money that we want to give for subsidies as aid. it is money that should come from the government's revenues anyway, but especially since we are currently paying this subsidy from oil money and this infale, and we cannot be a representative of something that is infale and belongs to the public . should i give this for money or not enough? the most important issue is that we represent both the rich and the poor. the problem is from another place , which i will explain. we have to give the subsidy to the general public because it is inefficient, but that is another issue. equitable, to have, to work, to produce , to serve. they did and their capitalization is good and lawful, the place of that capital and the source of their money is in

the authority of the food system, so that the food system can determine whether the source of their source is the money they have is real money or fake money, but we want to deprive that person of a right because having it this is our mistake, it should be from that asset, if he is doing speculation, he is actually adding his own capital . we cannot tax our payment system because there is money on the side, we have to tax it . you know that in france, someone who has money and has a good place lives in france. well, he lives in france , he gives 60-70% of his share of happiness, but unfortunately, i don't know. in an interview i had a few years ago, i said that we have someone who has 2000 empty houses, which of course is about cgt or taxes. it was on capital id that

we prepared my plan and brought it to the previous parliament and we worked very hard to get this cji or tax on capital id approved. rejection and people not coming to register in the system, then the law will not be implemented. however, we have two arguments whether this is a subsidy or a help. it's a matter of public money , should we give it to everyone or not? i say give it to everyone, but after the one who used more than the subsidy, because you know the money for water and gas and electricity is not the price that we get. the government is paying subsidies so that someone can go , for example, build 100 houses. well, the one who built 100 houses, the one who owns a thousand houses, the one who owns a few cars has 10 billion tomans in taxes. unfortunately, we have a look at it, we are saying that tax is a tool. come on, no , from a scientific point of view, tax should have a control point of view , that is, we should tax the one who has it, maybe

we should not give him much more than what is the size of one share, and we don't want to tax him. and the issue of tax evasion that is going on, which i will talk about in the continuation of our conversation, is really not the number that is said to be exchanged in the economy. some researches have been done by great professors of economics, but i am strongly opposed to us coming into this debate . first of all, we cannot make a decision from the point of view of customary law. those with low incomes would pay more, but i don't have a representative or an expert to change the shari'a and legal view of anfal. which i will talk more about in the following . thank you, mr. babaei. how

much do you agree with mrs. saeedi's statements? in your opinion, yes, in the name of allah , the most merciful , the most merciful. and the experts of the leadership responded to the call of their leadership and thanked the honorable nation of iran for doing a great job of supporting the system of the officials and i also thank the people of my constituency sari mian dardoud and mazandaran for trusting us again. but about the discussion that i have today i am at your service, contrary to the opinion of mr. seka , mrs. dr. saeedi, who is one of my good representatives , let me tell you that i fundamentally disagree that the source of this income is not the government's income at all. in fact, the entire nation of iran

had made some commitments based on those indicators of justice. you should check the resources of the country's budget, in my opinion. at all, there is a root cause for discussion. we do not reach the subsidy at all. this is not called subsidy at all. we were placed in the country with the view of justice against the lower strata of the society from every perspective. they should reach a suitable point until they actually reach those indicators of justice and equal opportunities . now, before calling it a subsidy , what did we give to those people ? we didn't give anything, that's why today , when we use the facilities and infrastructure and there are many issues in the country today that we are using, unfortunately, we did not provide equal conditions for the upper and lower levels of the society , which is called subsidy. there was a law on the targeting of subsidies first of all, there was a question about the basis of the law. on the day that

i think it was the 8th or 9th in the parliament , it was approved in the name of the law on the targeting of subsidies. at that time, the discussion was that, in fact , we spend everything we have in the country, on gasoline, for example, what are those who have more facilities than us better off in this country , they have been prepared for good lives after at least the revolution, but in reality 7 10 the bottom of the society have nothing from this country , they have no share of this country, the parliament decides for us, after all, the highest ones, yes, those who do more work, they do more based on those who have more use. then a person named capitalist , what is the economic rent of the country in this country

? look at 160, the unconscious opportunities of the state economy at that time to some of the activists. so-called, he gave economic activists of our country that when the dollar was 7 tomans , he gave facilities to some people of the political circle, and the other party was dependent on a certain political movement, and at that time he gave them the opportunity. there is no real transition in the country, assuming that when we gave those facilities, today it has facilities and infrastructure, for example, your car is a car look at the upbringing, with someone who wants to buy a car like pritt in the society, he wants to try for his life at least with himself. we are questioning the accuracy of this equality of individuals and deciles of society in society when we have a discussion about our basis , so let's explain the 70th effort, to whom should we give it , if we want to give it, in my opinion, with these indicators , i absolutely, practically, firstly go to the top percentile. i completely agree that it should be removed, even in my opinion , the fourteen above should be removed, however, in

the following discussions, i will definitely have a serious objection to the discussion of indexing for tagging today's society. the fact that you objected to this

work from the ground up, because the topic of our discussion is whether the end is full or not. should he get a boost or not, you say that it is 14 years and they don't raise it, yes, i say don't take it. well, now when you see that the government should give it to everyone, but everyone is taking oil money for everyone , it will not go to you from the government's income, which is not the basis. see what you are doing in behrab behrabi, what do you see, the decision-making index for the country is not right now, but not me . it has not been proven that this is a lie. they are paying for oil money. look, we have reached this point. we have reached this point its economy let us be clear, dr. pajohian, dr. memarnejad

, that is, from 4 times to 7 shares equal to what has been announced, our real economy is 4 times to 7 shares equal to this 7,000,000. let's see that you and i are representatives of the rich and the poor. what do people like? people seem to like us to say that we are only in favor of the lower middle class, and maybe because i am talking about 10% of the society , that means 5% to 10% of the class that does not need it at all. what percentage of their lives is this subsidy? at all the person who has money is right, he says that there is no money for him at all, he gets this subsidy, but the problem here is that maybe we have to correct the structure, that the amount of money that is available to the people and can be used in the economy, see how much pseudo-money we have. checks that are being exchanged, gold coins, dollars, all this is being exchanged in our economy, now the question is that it

has leaked from economic activity, after all, it is in our economy, it is our underground economy, that's it , see if you and i have to come to the underground economy and discuss. well, let's come to stop it , not to say, sir, this 10% is deprived it's best when we have the root of the discussion and the drill of the discussion, and then if we come to a conclusion , then people's opinions will change at all . today, our discussion is here. the thing that has left a judgment in the society today is that it says that these 70 efforts are necessary. oil income is not necessary, it is not really. why do we not subsidize 8% of our economic growth? do you, the parliamentarians , have the underground income of the society, or do we now have 20% of the society that we want to say ? in general, one of our problems in the country is that we are eliminating the middle class, and it is

a pain to see that it really has a standard of living. there are two models, either average, lower, or excellent, and we are rich and poor. the gap between the rich and the poor is increasing day by day. we must find this pain and solve this problem. where do we have a gap in our economic structures ? look at the anti-trafficking law. it says that if someone exchanges cash anyway , he will take my money . he doesn't have cash, he has dollars , can he do his transactions in this country or not, right? this is also the criterion for the calculation of decision makers, the decision of friends

should not be, why should we correct the process, today we call the rich people more than that, the rich are two groups, they are the same group , those who are based on the rentier economy, have their accounts in the same country. there are a group of people who do not pay the bills, they are doing economic work. according to your word , are these people entitled to receive cash subsidies or not? if not

, please find out according to what law you are here as a supporter of high-income subsidies. let's do it. we in our parliament now have a superficial law called the law on the targeting of aid. unfortunately, the basis of this law has been approved during the day. no parliament has done the next procedure, even the 11th parliament. we have a difference of opinion here. when you base a decision on it , there is a problem, i just say yes, no. with the same mechanism , i said that i agree because mobla mobla is not fair, that's why i say giving a ten-year so-called subsidy, let's name it for now, no matter where the origin is, it's up to 14 today, if it's above , i completely agree to remove it, the reason is that because you say this is the law, yes, i am the reason for the law of course, the law said the loudest voice clearly in the hadfandi rana law from the beginning. now the government has come with a practical order. he has come, what he said , he just took a deck and removed it. is it right now? i know an employee at the level of the manager of the

deck. it should come or, for example, there should be two efforts in us . in one way, it should be for those who want justice in the country , in fact, they want to replace the bad policies of the governments in different eras. for example, we have 2 million unemployed university students. solve the government in any way they couldn't create a job for him, the world has created a solution for them, the issue of unemployment insurance all over the world wants a special law of its own, we are the same.

the university that the government took could not create employment for you, the government gave an excuse saying that i don't have the resources, so i say, dear government, you don't have an excuse, the best job is to remove it here, but why not for the cost of the bed and the government's expenses , that's why i disagree with the expenses there. for the time being, i agree with this statement, and we must take the fire to the direction that the party should, in fact. that which governs for the benefit of the people because the structure is not fair for them, if this is the view, i agree to be a member, mrs. saeedi, yes, i am speaking on my own , there is also a legal point that you mentioned, mr. babaei. can you answer them? by law , they are worried about the few decades that are down. well, in the 10th parliament , we caused 20% of the minimum wage of the labor department

to be given to the people covered by the relief and welfare committee . is that right, mr. doctor? yes, in the 10th parliament, in the sixth plan, we approved that the parliament it is obligatory to state 20% of the minimum salary of the labor department to the people in the budget under the cover of the relief and welfare committee, you were also the head of the labor faction and you worked hard on this issue. i want to see if much. we eat the greed of those groups, why in that parliament , now we tried our best to keep this 20% until the end of the parliament , aren't there other laws equal to it that we eat their greed, after all, of course, this belongs to we have a series of people who are not covered, that is , they are not willing to be covered, but we currently have this group.

of people. let's get their satisfaction by allocating the same 20% . the pain i have, mr. engineer, do you know what it is, mr. dr. engineer, excuse me, mr. bozor, yes , look, the pain i have is that we, the people who are unfairly endowed, want to equalize the pensioners' rights. we don't have a budget , we want 20% minimum salary , let's talk about it, we say there is no budget, we want 10%, these are the people we want to give subsidies to

, they have the right to give them or give them 10 houses, we have to give them, is this right ? he has money, he has the property of the poor, and we have to come on, the one who has money depends on where the money comes from. if he does business, i say the one who is doing production, we have nothing to do with him . it does, but you see, we have to set a size that everyone should have according to the number of family members , for example, a husband and wife and 2 children can have 4 houses of 250 meters . pay the tax on that 475 when he sells it, then who does this tax belong to?