let's fix it and give it to the final consumer, because the answer to those parts is that the manufacturer, importer , will not get a subsidy, the final cost should come here , let's give it to the consumer because we don't have supervision, if our supervision is strong, we won't tell the final consumer to produce and the importer will pay the full price. yes , monitoring, if we do it, yes, we should give it to the importer as well, but let us monitor it so that it reaches our consumers at the price we want, but it does not reach today, that means we have it too. we pay that subsidy , our producer has a complaint, our consumer has a complaint , so we have to go and fix it, stop this. if this does not happen, the whole country will surely suffer, mr. hashemi, do you believe this now, that is, if you are the decision-maker in the 12th parliament , change the law, or if you want to ask the government to make these changes, now you believer

do you want this subsidy to be removed from the importer and the producer so that it reaches the people who need it, or should we continue with this current situation, or should we strengthen the supervision and give it to the producer and importer? the reality of our experience is that supervisions have never been strong supervisions i will give a specific example, but regarding bread, well, we have many countries in the world regarding bread. subsidizing bread and milk now even in europe is subsidized, only bread, not cakes, cookies, pastries, and macaroni products, and how directly, bread and milk, milk and only milk itself, not dairy products, that is, these two products are low cost.

in many countries of the world, only two products , bread and milk , are fully subsidized by the government, and the governments are not. my question is clear. because of this for example, they get cash , they don't get value added tax, they get a full subsidy , they have a full support rate. in fact, it means that the support purchase by the people is formed for bread. for wheat, this debate has been established for the people or their producers, yes, for their people or for their producers, the benefits go to their people , they buy support from their producers, like now , we buy the guarantee that we have about wheat in our country, well , this purchase is support for the people, now you can see the same discussion about flour, is it supervision on our bakeries in the true sense. there is? why

are we in this situation now? can you put two control officers on each bread? can you just use your system , i will tell you about its executive discussions. well, in the case of bread, we have to apply a common support. this means that these differences will gain public support if the government comes. in the field of bread , he can say, i support bread and milk in general . i will say you look, we have a law on store terminals in our parliament, the main problem is in implementation.

the root of our problems is in implementation . if there is financial transparency, all the stores in our country should be registered from the shop that sells a bottle of mineral water at zero point of our border. our information systems , our bank cards, our purchase amount, its connection. to our store system, our store to the tax payer system, and after that, in fact, the discussion of the law of the commercial society that we have is the system of the law of the commercial society it means the compatibility of the systems, then about the compatibility of the hacking system, now we have different systems, i have to mention my property and assets.

what is the model of the world? specifically, in order to formulate our discussion , my question for mossad was that, for example, we are referring to the chicken and the producer and the importer . we are subsidizing the people. let's make it fundamental to implement the law. first of all, the data of all iranians should be matched . no, how much is the salary of the head of the household and all the components of the household ? what is family? what category does this fall into? is it covered or not? then come and show this effect in your bank purchase and money card, and in fact , your bank card and your bank account, and go to the last terminal

of the store to match. if this chain is well known in our country. sir, we have problems in the field of information technology. we have to complete this chain. if we complete this chain , why shouldn't that person from the lower strata of society go to a bread with get a subsidized price of ilo with a higher support rate so you believe that it will be paid to the end of the chain yes provided that yes that that actually that chicken

we should actually go talk about how we can best serve with the same the view of social justice should reach the people, which in your opinion was not to pay to the first of the chain or in the chain as a whole , to see the financial availability, financial transparency of the input and output in the system . let me give you an example . we passed a law in the 11th parliament it was a good law that the agricultural commission and the friends of the parliament helped to approve the reform of the agricultural products pricing council. look, i will show you an example in this section. we used to pay 42 currency for wheat, and

we bought wheat from, for example, argentina, from ukraine. we buy from russia, now we buy from australia, the price is 300 dollars per each, well, when we buy 300 dollars each , when our manager calculates this, with 420 , the price becomes 1200 tomans. i will buy toman if this is subsidizing him foreign production here will be destroyed, what happened ? the feeling is that in the last year of the government, in the last year of the last government, our wheat production reached four and a half million tons, we imported 7 million tons of wheat, but with this reform we made, we said, sir, you want to do the term of this purchase, the purchase must be at the real price, see the international price, see the domestic price, see the inflation, see all this and the price reached, for example, a price that was equivalent to the foreign price and support our production here , let us help, but what is the result now? the result was

the purchase of ten and a half million tons of wheat last year farmer 19 4 million tons, 1.5 million tons and 1 million tons, our import did not reach a million, less than 2 million, or now one or a half million tons , see this support for production, now right here, we want to give fertilizer to our producer, chemical fertilizer, fertilizer the chemical that we expect to increase the production, what happened? we need about four and a half million tons of fertilizer every year, of which 3 million are the so-called nitrogen fertilizer, now the rest is potassium and phosphorus fertilizer. let's go and produce basic goods, let's not produce vegetables and safflower when we import wheat, he says, well, the wheat we want to import is a chemical fertilizer . let's go up, our imports will decrease , well, this fertilizer that we gave, half of this fertilizer

was taken out of the consumption cycle, why did it go to the fields that have vegetables and sif, our wheat decreased, well, when this happens, we will come and tell you, sir, for what you did last year. done, the price of wheat, for example , 11,500 tomans, 1,000 tomans for the delivery of each kilo of wheat for fertilizer, we pay to the producer, that is, to the producer. we gave, but the last ring of production means give me the wheat , take it, don't give me the fertilizer, don't take my wheat, whenever he brought it to the silo, he delivered the wheat per kilo, now let's decide here, 1,000 tomans , 200 tomans, 3,000 per kilo, as much as we want to help , give this here. to support its production, and the government is buying this wheat, and the government buys it in bakeries at a so-called price. it is guaranteed that the price will not increase for the people, the government is giving that subsidy there, but it is not wasted here

, so we have to go in the direction of making the plans and doing the rules and monitoring properly. it doesn't affect our production. the model we have for subsidizing flour and bread is good from your point of view. it can be suitable. it can be suitable, but on the condition that the so-called wheat price is the same price as our bakery. if it is finished, for example , if the government buys wheat for 17,500 tomans , it is floured, it is the so-called waste, whatever is flour, 20,000 tomans is delivered to the bakery for 20,000 tomans, but to the people, for example, the so-called stone bread 3,000 tomans, 4,000 tomans are counted there, that is, the amount that he gave to the people , not that the bag of flour is out of the cycle of people's consumption. let's see, we have a billion dollars of exports of sweets every year. are we going

to give preferential treatment to that export of sweets? our sweets flour is subsidized, sugar is subsidized, oil is subsidized, cream is also subsidized, so what do we have? do we give foreign subsidies or the oil that we import several billion dollars a year, now with measures. which has come to the country in the oil factories , oil seeds have arrived, my oil has not arrived, well, the uae produces oil, so-called agriculture to produce oil , no, the uae goes from argentina and brazil, oil seeds he buys it, but at the same price, for example, 500 dollars per ton, he brings it to his country , extracts the oil, exports it , what do we do? width 4. after 200, we will bring the oil into our country, we will take some of

it, we will give it to the people, some of it will be exported to our neighboring countries up to a depth of 300 km , where we have nothing to europe. the same thing is the same thing , now it's different, we say that if we can minimize these differences and give that money to the people or to the ultimate producer. let's say, sir, that you deliver a kilo of chicken to the slaughterhouse , so you get so-called yaran, not that it is bought and sold in the process of the yaran production chain. imam khomeini port, masher, they were loading , they came out, this speeder that was on the road, jumped up and down the car , put two kilos and spilled out. they collect the input there because it is at a strange price these are the things for which we

should give this subsidy to the people , even those with low incomes, not to come and make a margin for some people and they will take it and then come to the country and make a double. there is no duality, this is an expert work, we must come to a conclusion for the benefit of the people, mr. qadeh hashemi, now you agree with the model that mr. abbasi refers to, that is, somewhere, for example, like ardonan, we should also pay attention to the producers of our friends , and also to my people regarding we are for basic goods and products. many other goods and our other products

when we don't create that transparency in full, you, for example, now about profit. we are giving subsidies, we are importing gasoline right now and we are explaining the gasoline at a cheap rate . can we now say that the price of gasoline should be calculated as a free rate? what will happen, who is even willing to accept the responsibility regarding there are many topics, you can now compare the price of gasoline with the price of mineral water, compare the price of diesel, like the same discussion about removing the width of 42, removing the width of the square, it was supposed to be only about basic hats or in the field of food. it has an effect, saying its effect in a specific way, but you can see that it has an effect on other goods

, it has an effect on construction goods, it has an effect on clothes and clothing. if we want to talk about the price of fuel, the prices of different goods have a situational effect on all other basic goods , and right now we have more than 100 billion dollars a year in subsidies . mr. minister, our gas should be solved oil says that we need new investments at the bottom of 80 billion dollars . this industry must turn around on its own feet. this industry must be able to produce and maintain this amount, otherwise it will be depreciated over time. but is anyone responsible for removing subsidies ? if he accepts it, tell him that i

will remove all of these and give all the hidden subsidies to the consumer. many animal husbandry institutions mention soybeans . how much barley do we import ? how much barley do we import? what amount do we import? the same thing about fertilizer that you mentioned, we are now our fertilizer production units sometimes it is not possible because there are many interests in the import of fertilizer , so i am at your service to point out that we are talking about this issue at the same time at the same time

. it fell into the hands of the farmer . your distribution mechanism has a problem. at the same time, two years ago, during the corona period, we were all in our own province in khorasan. food files were created for these distribution companies and different networks of distribution companies in the villages for the distribution of institutions. dami , if there is no difference, basically you

all right, when you receive a privilege as rent, from its source to its destination in that village , you have eaten a herdsman, which needs to be explained. there is time for the distribution of it to be managed, and this distribution is not managed properly. then you say, well, to whom did this rent go ? what layers did it reach? then you say that we should remove all of this and give consumers the final price of the livestock. did he actually follow the price of the subsidized input, not the price of the meat

and the price of the chicken? it happened that a fixed width of 423 was applied to a series of inputs, and it was at the current level at first, which was all, then it decreased. 5 pens. now i call it five pens. look at the year 2017 when this happened, the price of chicken was about 5 thousand tomans. within 3 years when this was implemented , the price of chicken was 21,950 tomans. well, look, we are paying 420, but the price of my chicken is four. it has been brought, so it is for us to say that if we give this width, the price will not change. this is not because we have to make this clear to the people. you see, about 60 to 70% of the price

of broiler chicken, which is coming into the country with the width, so we are ensuring this. we will make another 40%, 35%, the other 40%, everything that is inside the country is taken from the wages of its workers, and it is rented. there are other issues, so this affects its own percentage. and the fact that we had inflation every year is what you mentioned that all the goods were supposed to be 5 items, but everything became expensive. all that inflation is 30-40% constant in the country. we didn't do it as it is. they buy, for example, 15,000 tomans, what happened to 60,000 tomans in a moment, and it became 60,000 tomans many times, now they say oil everywhere. 400, the price went up, yes, it went up , but in the heart of that 300,000 tomans that was given to people, or 400 tomans, 45,000 tomans

was for oil, now this happened, you take the oil you see, in these 2 years after the policy of removing width was preferred, the price has changed, the price of oil has not changed that much, we had a stabilization here , we have to go in this direction . for example, there was an annual inflation , but we could have stopped the so-called inflation that is going on in petrochemicals, we could have increased the price of rights , we could have increased the number of workers , but this did not happen, and this is all, what is the annual inflation that has existed, now? look at the year 1400, 1401, 1402, this is 3 years before the width preferential and after the preferential width, there is inflation. now , i am not an expert in economics , i am not involved in many of these things, but the number and figure that comes out is an average of 40% inflation before the preferential width, this preferential width and after it, we had it in these three or four years.

let's not say that everything became more expensive. everything did not become more expensive. the things that were included in the so-called preferential width, such as the oil that came out of it completely, have been fixed , a place like the chicken, where 30% is other than that , something else happened to it and the rest. it has been an annual visit to make this clear to the people, to seek a correct policy that is produced by the people and from the people we should support our producers and consumers, so if we, mr. doctor, see if we are looking for dollarization , it is a good policy. we should not depend on the dollar. so , if we are looking for dollarization, we must first strengthen our domestic production. i take the example of wheat. i told you that if we

come to increase the productivity in the other part , we should increase the productivity and release some of the land under wheat cultivation, or, so to speak , take the vegetables and sif we are producing to the greenhouse of a series of lands . if we free it, we can provide for our hunger let's use our money, we can travel even if we are hungry, so here you go to the dollar. if we are looking for the slogan that i will not sell you , this article will be sold in dollars. de-dollarization is very good, but de-dollarization on the condition that we strengthen our domestic economy , strengthen domestic production, even if we complete the monitoring , i agree with you and the rest of my friends, if zero to one hundred monitoring is ensured, we should only give subsidies to the producer, but on the condition if we observe this from the beginning to the end, let me tell you the last point of this episode, the year 1400, the year 1400.

when he died there was turmoil and the previous government established a chicken camp, even though it offered 420, we talked to the basij children in alborz province, who asked him for a so-called terminal where the chicken comes to be stored, even a so-called cold-storage car that goes there. let one of the basij children go with him and explain to the end that this is not the case, that we have to fix it. look at you, the dependence of the country's agriculture and food sector on the dollar has increased , that is, yes, you are in the field of wheat, because the production is completely domestic production, purchase support and guaranteed purchase, but do you dependencies have decreased, no, they have increased, why have they increased, because politics happens to pay attention to the ability, why did not the same system come for the development of greenhouse cultivation, why for the development of agricultural ponds, why is this the same.

note 8, which should go to the production of the agricultural sector , has not been paid. why should the support for greenhouse cultivation and the modernization of irrigation water and soil policies under the pressure of low-pressure irrigation not be given? why has everything gone to boldly import barley and soy? and even you other products, all of these , dear mr. dr. abbasi, look at me , all of these because we went, even in the market in jihad and agriculture sector, the sweet part is in the commercial sector and how much should be allocated to you , sir, and how much should be imported, the ministry of home affairs has practically become the ministry of product imports . when we go to our chickens , we go to look for imports, we go to products, with

the price of our chicken being higher today, wherever we are, tomorrow will be higher. 2 hours: in two separate incidents in two coal mines.

at least 12 people died in china. one of these incidents happened in a coal mine in stanshi, and as a result, 5 people were killed and two were missing. occurrence the explosion caused by the release of gas in another mine in anhui province in eastern china also killed 7 people and injured two others. in early march , the collapse of a coal mine in china killed at least 10 people and left dozens more missing. increase. a fatal mining accident in china last year forced the country's mine safety organization to revise its laws. the senior american senator demanded the termination of american aid to the zionist regime. bernie sanders told cbs america that what we have seen in gaza means that