it is far away from the services it provides to the provincial centers , from the point of view of education, that is, the diploma that someone gets in the provincial centers is the same as the facilities that are provided in the deprived provinces, in small towns, in the cities , this is not the same. then we will give an entrance exam, we will say this to each other, come compete , we gave someone 3 units of information, we gave information to someone who gave 10 units of information and information , we say this to each other, compete , we also give a small contribution to these, well, our universities it happens that some universities 55% of their students from the first decile are above the highest. that's it. because we didn't have social justice, we didn't have educational justice . you believe that the budget allocated to the ministry of science, for example, is allocated to the ministry of education.

it should be for the 3 million students who are making an impact, not just the 400,000 who go to the government every day. you see, there will be a problem if we come to say that the budget is the government's capacity for educational budgets. allowing a university to come as a private university that the students should start at their own expense , that the capacity of the people themselves should be used, that is, when the government's capacity for education is low, it says , "i can't take that many more students per year, for example , i can't provide for 400,000 more students, so it 's not possible. now, if we come, this let's close it and say no, we don't take any more students , we don't have 400,000 more, the rest will go to their jobs, now they are coming to predict private universities like azad university and others , they should charge their own expenses , we can't do it now. let's say that if the government wants to give it there

, it has no choice but to give it. if it had 3 million students, it would have to give it all because we don't have it now. let's go to the university and tell the public university to divide it between them. well, they can't do anything for them anymore. they have to pay, that is, they have to state a percentage, and then we have to tell the students that our public students, when they are admitted to a public university , come and pay such a percentage of your expenses so that we can do this work. i mean, we don't do anything let's make sure that our public universities from all sections of the society can do the above, so that when we can't provide services, that small city and that deprived province will compete with itself, its students, not its students, with the students of mashhad universities, students of mashhad, tehran, isfahan, shiraz and tabriz should compete or, for example, now in the discussion of azad university because shahria is a very challenging topic. do you believe that

the universities themselves should determine the tuition fee or not ? it is not right for the university to determine the tuition fee by the university. there is a situation where the principle of education and training is with the government. they come alongside the government to do the educational work. they are like private banks . they must implement the government's approvals and the government must supervise them. therefore, it is a mistake to call azad university. whatever you set the tuition fee for, it is correct that the university tuition fee should be in the hands of people other than the zainefs themselves, with a mechanism that is expected, because the university itself is the management of the zainef university . there is also in recession and in it is amazing that there can be no tears

and problems. we must forgive and solve these problems with the efforts of the people and the officials and with our own elections on time and in our place , that is, if we had made the right choice. these calamities did not happen to us, we have to take responsibility for our choices, it is not like i choose and then say that now that it has become bad , i will not participate in the elections at all, no , we have to take responsibility. therefore, my request is that, just as you know with passion , you also control the coming of those who choose. and monitor and carefully see that they are correct and fulfill their responsibilities. thank you very much , mr. nakhe irat, for your presence in the first page program. of course, i am successful. thank you and your colleagues for giving me this opportunity. let's go to the second part of this conversation.

that will be clear with other chosen ones. in my opinion, it is the cash subsidy to the national code. to this. it is better if this subsidy goes directly into khan's economy . i did my transparency before my election . equilibrium economy. must the government should implement how many of those programs that have been implemented or how many of them have not been implemented, it is not our problem, it is not the work of the parliament , it can definitely be effective in curbing inflation.

somehow, now the duty of the representative has been misinterpreted. which is the essence of legislation and monitoring , we believe in strict legal regimes that we can communicate and use the capacity of countries. we speak islam , the dear ones who are our guests are from that in this election period of the 11th of march elections, they managed to win the people's votes and be elected as the people's elected representatives, and we insist that for the time being in this program , we will learn from these friends with the word elected, because it is

one step before the election of parliament representatives. there is still a long way before the approval of the credentials in the parliament, so there may be some changes, but what is certain is that until now, the friends who have been voted as the electors of the constituencies. there will be an election, and there is still one more step left until the representation of the parliament, anyway, tonight , in the second part of the program, the first page will be hosted by mr. we are jahanbakhsh qaravand, the honorable elected representative of the people of andy meshk in khuzestan province. i say hello and you are very welcome. good evening . i am at your service, my dear colleagues. we start with transparency . how transparent are you and how much do you believe in this transparency? any slogan in the name of allah , the most merciful, well, it is well known that politics is known as the glass palace, which means that the field of politics must be transparent, this field is faced with various issues and there is pollution, definitely in all positions, in

all behaviors, actions need a transparency in the field of parliament, which is about legislation, is monitoring naturally, in the same positions, in voting and in behavior. this transparency should be implemented and it is for the benefit of the country and for the benefit of my representatives. i believe in transparency. there may be contradictions in some places. after all, there are expedient considerations that you have to avoid making your vote and opinion clear to everyone. and let everyone know what you think and what you rejected. yes , there is a principle of transparency, there is a special place where there are security discussions, discussions that are not separated from security and military discussions, yes. transparency is in all of you , for example, suppose it is a plan and a bill that may have disadvantages if there is a problem for your constituency in andy, people don't like this to happen. in my opinion , transparency is generally in the interest of all countries, even it may be to the detriment of the representative, or the conflict of interests between the most important things

should be done between, for example, national interests, national interests, and local issues. conflicts may happen here . yes, we must defend those public issues. you had a long-term pre-planned plan for the parliament. for example , you were preparing for the previous years whether you would enter the parliament as a representative or not . i have been present in meon for a while before , i was rejected, i was present, i was rejected, i have this experience, people are in the news, but look, my major is planning, which means i understand that in the districts, in the regions , in the provinces, in the city, and in the country, the program is discussed. what is the form of planning? it is natural that i am familiar with the basics of this science and resources. i know the human resources, population, natural resources of the country. a question that

is usually asked in those meetings is what is your plan for the city. the plan of the city should be put in the big area of ​​the country we have a role in the general policies of the country, public policy, but we can recognize experienced managers in a faculty. and with the help of the executive branch of the main leaders , he formulated the main strategies of the city and the province under the basic plans of the country . yes, this is possible. for the country of the city, for example, the council should follow up. i am saying here that in the provincial meetings in recent days, with 15 people. of the elected representatives of the province, in fact, there are 3 people left for the next round, the next deadline, with the 15 people

who were present in the province, i clearly understood that the view of our friends is more localism, while the issues of the representation of the country are public policies. and this conflict that arises between the interests of local representatives and public issues. in my opinion, it is to the detriment of the whole country. well , it is natural that in this domain, which is public , there is a public policy maker , he is a public supervisor. instead of health and treatment, instead of education, the mayor should be the all-rounder of the county, the all -rounder of the province, and ignore the issue of segregation, the issue of implementation, he wants to get votes in the next round. finally , my people will see what would happen to their city if there is a strong and national representative.

the leaks of those good things at the macro level reach my city , the good things reach the level of my regions, and i believe that the representative's weakness is that he wants to stick to local issues, but he should monitor, support , help, and be the voice of the people at the level of the dynasty . in my opinion, there will be no more problems at the regional and national levels when you are the manager i want the country to be managed by the government to be properly elected and at the lower levels, single managers are expert managers and not to be influenced by the pressure of the representatives. there , when the managers have their own prominence , there is no need for the interference of the representatives, but they should proudly defend the rights of the executive managers.

i came to the conclusion that the interferences were wrong . it seems that it is spiritual enough that it is distorted from the position of people everyone should be in their place as an observer, moderator, and moderator. and if these interferences develop , it will lead to the discussion of political corruption, which means that deviations will be created, not only will it be misused, but it is not the case that allameh's representative is there , he is not zulfan's representative. for example, she must be pregnant, she has received her grades , she has not studied during the representation, she has studied, and she has executive experience by her side. well, this is a value for

representation . soil, natural resources, arteries , river currents, hundreds of hydrological discussions, discussions related to society, society, damage, these are all fields , well, it is not supposed that the representative instead of all these, i saw in the interviews of his highness and friends with the new elected officials do you all know where you read about economics? yes, what is your specialty ? what do you think about all of this? i think that the person who is elected by the people has a specialty. he can talk, but we are not supposed to be in a place where there is a public discussion every time we face a problem, we say something out of ten, but in the end, you are all this. you have a vote. another specialized economic issue comes to the table and

you have to vote. your vote for that economic doctorate makes no difference. that is exactly the place to study. without studying, without research, we have a research center. you have to go to the representatives. yes, you have to vote. it should be real science, that is, the research should be based on the facts of the country, when these researches are the results of these researches. if he is civil , he will deal with all issues wisely, or consult with an expert, then come to an opinion let him sit and read, that means he should not look , he gave four or two armchairs, this is the same thing. i would like to follow up on this in the parliament, so that the dear ones do not speak instead of all the scientists. ask the university professors from the center of pashubasha, in their positions , scholars should really speak and give their opinions, not sit around

and talk about the occasion, competition, relationships, parties, and advice, which is harmful in the country. we hope that you can learn this culture from our resources you can do the work in the parliament . i think you should follow your own mission. i am a defender of this . i came from the university. i came from a scientific environment. i studied hard. i also worked as an executive . okay, we should have specialized specializations based on knowledge, and it is really harmful. if we want to deal with a formality , we should generalize the output of the researches, and sometimes it has been seen that the representatives even understand the meaning of the provisions of the article they are establishing. they don't agree and they vote or oppose the same words

they say correctly neither studying nor reading nor listening. i saw in the parliament what gross mistakes there are in the amount of words and expressions , not only not reading the text, they don't know the content , not passing at least two credits, they say something and their positions are the positions of mr. alman, which commission will you go to, do you like these commissions? it is based either on expertise or on the basis of the environment in which he grew up, for example, our province, khuzestan province , wants to explain what roles khuzestan has in the country. almost a large part of khuzestan's resources are national. the population of khuzestan works there is a nationalism in the discussion, even in the discussion of the shia religion , peace be upon him, the imams, peace be upon him, independent, if it is important, our history, our ancient history , our glorious past history, it has national works

, it has national messengers, our waters are national, our beaches are national , the sacrifice and sacrifice of khuzestan. the stanis are the guests in the war, the host of all iranians, being at war in the sacred defense of this nation and the economy of khuzestan and our oil and gas . our nation has added value and has national effects. wheat , corn, we are the fifth citrus of the country, many indicators ours is the first, but unfortunately, khuzestan is unemployed and has the rank of three countries. well, this goes back to the same discussion of not dealing scientifically with the regions in the planning of the country, but i want to say that i am interested because khuzestan is a main source of the country's income. in oil and gas , energy commission, energy two, in the field of construction and development, my field

is in the discussion of development and planning. there is logic in the field, well, they are also interested in budgeting for the construction budget in the industry and mining of our province , instead of the economists of the country , i am opposed to them with different theories, but as a citizen i am affected by the chaos in the economy, livelihood, and income

. the opinions of the experts who say that our position is based on the same methods, after all, their opinions mean that an expert may completely agree , a completely different expert is different, the one who is more difficult is for the benefit of the people. well, if you don't have the expertise, how do you know who owns it? i made this diagnosis in between. two or three fields or two or three concepts the title of this is, i decide which one is closer and more correct, it is in the interest of the people, there i decide based on justice, on the basis of justice and fairness.

for example , our friends have said about the provincial powers, yes, i am sure who wants to implement these powers . we raised the powers, we raised the credits, but in practice we did not see that most of them are concentrated in the center, there is a geographical force that governs the issues of the country, which means that everyone in the center is more wealthy, more determined, and a decision maker in politics. investments are involved, it comes to fit lower , it becomes fainter. well, these powers are body to body to the middle regions of the country, provinces .

for example, in my previous courses , it was discussed, for example, the representative said that the last thing i can do is, for example, make an insult, answer a question , or the bottom line is that , for example, i do a humiliation and an investigation. its practicality is not known. how much do you think the parliament can change the structures? see, this is a concern that everyone talks about, but in practice and the implementation is the result of all this. i realized that our experts

, our policy makers , our decision makers and our decision makers do not reach a consensus. okay, for example , we have seen the statements of hazrat agha in the discussion of principle 44 , it was brought up 20 years ago, 15 years ago, where it was implemented, there is no consensus, in fact, the leader of the revolution determined the basic end of the board, and we saw it being implemented again, and the results are at the expense of the government. when he came to the parliament , he ended up in different directions, this is the reason there is no consensus, which means that we , the economic experts, the social planners of the country in various fields of economy and society, they must reach a national consensus on macro-decisions that will be implemented correctly. our leaders, our laws , and our policies should be clear. now , let's assume that a general policy is announced. yes , i notice that it comes in different topics. is it correct that

we say that every general policy that is announced, the executives must reach a consensus. i said that there should be a national consensus in our foreign policy, for example from the highest levels state administration. it is clear what is the bottom line. i will give an example. we started the vision in 1984, there are 2 years left in 1402. why couldn't we implement a large part

of it? it was in our executive policy, it was in the parliament, it was in the law, it was in the law, the issue every year was the budget and five-year plans. this should be evaluated step by step, every policy should be monitored in the field of implementation, that was the work of the parliament, it should be monitored , but one of the representatives of that monitoring, which should be scientific, accurate, transparent and healthy, that is, god forbid communication and relationships.

they should follow up on that policy until it was implemented and it should be detailed the government should monitor why it wasn't done. we have time to follow this path with the statistics of these one minutes . now, if you want to continue this discussion for one minute or any other topic that you think is necessary in this one minute, please tell me that i will remain silent. i tell you, do we want to start the next phase or not, not a minute, until the end of this conversation , i am from khuzestan province and dear people of the country, who are waiting for the 12th parliament to shine in the field of policies that provide national interests. the situation

of the people to life guarantees the future of young people i strongly insist that they pay attention to those who are grateful, they have a heavy responsibility for you, and for all the representatives and all those who , god willing, find their way to the parliament . thank you for watching this conversation. thank you for your evening. thank you very much.

i am in curriculum planning consulting. i have a problem , but i don't have a good guide. this is gilana publications, and we have made this problem easy for you to get 60% of these resources. completely free , send the number 5 to the system 3085 now , get 60 of gilna publications as a gift, send the number 5 to 30085 and get a biscuit. real ingredients, real flavors, real passion. where avand meets you, the best memories and flavors are shared. vessel just enjoy it.

i offer you my presence. the president called attention to the news of this news section at 4 am , the peace of mind of the people and considering the social effects of the decisions and actions of the government agencies as necessary . mr. raisi alfatat joined the preparation cultural and media for the decisions and actions of the apparatus as well. the adoption of necessary measures to prevent negative social effects of decisions was requested. mr.