those insurance payers do not receive salary as someone. how do you know that a woman who is a housewife should adjust her salary, she says that you can, you can fix the insurance of journalists, for example , you cannot do this . a worker who is in optional insurance, for example , where do you want to get his job?

we acted against me. look, i told you that there are 117 countries in the world, mr. dr. bar. please don't compare our country to the world . our country is in a special situation for 40 years. his health and treatment indicators have grown so much that we now have reached the age of 76 for men and 78 for women. we came, what did we do? we put the retirement law before modo so that i can retire earlier. when they say that our average retirement age is 51, mr. doctor, come and correct those rules. don't come here, mr. doctor. the biggest problem of our country is employment. you are going to increase the retirement age, which means that the workers will stay longer . how are you going to coordinate this with that? is it really open? who is retiring, josh?

you don't provide for an insured in such a way that he doesn't have to go find a second job, this second job is finding unemployment for someone who is looking for a job, a young person who has graduated from sawad university , wants to build a life, wants to go work somewhere. rights. imagine, naturally, the person who wants to hire this force is going to hire a retired force. mr. doctor, why does the government have a ban on hiring retirees, but it doesn't anymore? why, if the problem of our country is employment, i remember

that time it was passed in the parliament. it could be why retired people should not be employed. the debate was whether we should pass such a law, for example , 500 positions will be vacant, which means that the first debate is an employment debate . you say that the retirement age should be increased. when you say that the age has increased , the young workforce that can no longer go to work, that all the current workforce will remain, these are the things that actually conflict with each other, mr. doctor, you agreed with my words, when i said that we not only according to that increase of sanid to we did not take any action in our life, one action as a parametric reform to increase the age, but we came and passed the early retirement law

, what does it mean that we retired people who sometimes did not even start a family, so they will be added to the unemployed population of the society, we are also against it. this medicine that you prescribe does not cure those pains. by the way, in this decree , he mentioned exactly two things . one of the things that he said that this decree does not include is hard work and losses. let him help himself what kind of help does the government want to give? the government wants to give the debt of the social security organization to itself. who has ever owed a debt to a creditor ? let him set conditions for paying off his debt . say, "i will give you 10 hamat money if you do such and such a thing." it's true, mr. doctor says that the creditor can

draw a line for the debtor to do such and such , do such and such, mr. john, in this law , you wrote your development plan for the social security fund. he should accept the treatment in his own clinics, which is not insured by social security, and it is free, what do you think of those who do not belong to this fund they are not on the table . you invited them to come and take advantage of this table. instead, mr. doctor, mr. doctor , instead of spending from the workers ' pockets, take them out of the fund. . we believe in parametric reforms and it should be done, but it is not the time for science, we have a problem

. in your opinion, i took the least i wanted the government to help, should we depend on the public budget? the government or should we go in the direction of reducing our dependence on the general budget of the government year by year according to the upper law, if we accept the first part , the funds will definitely move towards becoming a self-sustaining device, but in the second part, we must should we accept the parameter reforms , is it possible without reforms to take action to strengthen the fund? my suggestion was that we now have 90% of the government's general budget. mr. doctor, you are right, the social security fund is not the social security fund is mainly paid by the employer , it is the private sector and also a government sector, i am not saying that it is not 20%, what the government gives, in fact 233, sorry

, i am correcting, the employer pays 23%, the employer pays 20% insurance premium, 3% unemployment insurance, 77 insured in the social security law. 3% in the name of shares. the government or the help of the government has been seen, this is at least what i have in my mind. it says that the government has paid this 3% only once since the beginning of the revolution, which means that the government does not give the help it should, it just repays the debt to the fund with terms and conditions, mr. doctor. the open fund structure of a country with a social security structure differently, you cannot wrap a single version for both. may the fund be effective, mr. faizinejad, one question now, according to you , how many of the problems and challenges of the funds have been solved by these parametric reforms ? in your opinion , until now , it has really done nothing. and during the programs, any suggestions that

we had, in fact, related to the age and history parameter reforms and the way to strike, the history and the way to strike. regarding pensions and the status of salary payments to employees or pensioners, despite the proposal we had, none of them were implemented. no, the same thing is the old age increase , the old age increase, which is implemented from a 14. your review is how much it can help the fund, how many percent will it solve your problem in the mismatch of the fund, see in relation to the fund, especially the national pension fund, according to this is that according to note d of article 3 of the law on regulations, when the employee completes his records , he is exempted from paying for 30 years of experience, and on the other hand, in the implementation of article 14 of the civil service management law

, we have to pay two and a half percent per year. despite the fact that we do not get bored, we will give him the difference in pension it may not have such an effect on the fund itself , except on the side. other reforms, but give pension funds a chance to breathe in these special circumstances, otherwise we will zoom in on this age change and feel that with this age change , for example, it is too much for 28 to 30-year-olds, which is not currently effective at all. something very special can't happen to the funds, at least it won't happen to the pension fund. it has changed, but now until the 28th of the short month , it means in a short period of time, a short period of time my average is that it has half effect . the pension fund is the one that needs to be added for 5 years. it is for incoming people with less than 10 years of age. that is when the person himself does not apply. if he applies at any time

, i cannot stay longer with the same history , that is, it is not required. for example, if my experience is 30 years. and i wanted to retire myself. i will be paid for 30 days. see, it depends on the law. it will reduce a percentage. just see how much is the required experience for you. if he studies according to age, it means with that experience, which is very unlikely. otherwise, he will get full salary. this is ali's face although you have 30 years of experience, but you do not have the required experience in that definition, if you become 32 years of experience, you must work for 32 years to be able to get 30. in fact, our full salary will be 32 years of work for 30 days of salary, if now it is 30. year of work for 30 days.

the funds recognize their own internal resources , and some funds are provided by the government. you can't say that, the fault of this fund is that the nature of insurance and pension funds basically leads to disharmony, that is, it is like this all over the world that their resources do not cover their expenses after a while. iran has not yet arrived or we are at the time of its occurrence , but the reality is that reaching this point. in the end, by passing laws that

are against the rules of insurance calculations, we enacted it. nowhere in the world is it possible to exempt some employers from paying insurance premiums with some poetry or to blame the exemption on the government, and the government if he does not have the ability to pay or repay, or if he wants to repay, in the discussion of updating it, put a thousand and one problems, as the saying goes today , or put a thousand and one objections, as they say in the old days , set a price that no one will buy when the money is due. face the organization. sometimes it says to give liquidity to the social security organization, which the government has no money at all . sometimes it says to give companies. it gives companies that are not very profitable if these companies go bankrupt.

create clarity in the organization's resources, because the companies that give it are bankrupt companies, limited to companies that the government occasionally gives to, but in many cases , it is like sports teams that want to give to the funds even in the face of bankruptcy. these funds themselves are bankrupt, what will happen to them if you go bankrupt? you gave the fund no right to operate . it says that the fund should not own this enterprise. in fact, it should own this company after 5 years . if it doesn't, the government will take it and sell it. it says that the money belongs to the government. it says that this fund and these resources belong to the government. dear, you should tell the social security organization, sir, in the implementation

of privatization, you must go and hand over your company within 5 years . if you don't hand it over, i will go to the stock market myself and sell it. sir, you say you can sell other people's property. do this, but you have passed the rules, that is do the work. in the same law, you approved the development program and received sums from the social security organization. i don't know, the fight against tobacco, the expansion of the cultural space , do this. what does the organization have to do with this ? i am a worker, i am insured, i paid an insurance premium so that i will receive his pension in old age and disability. i myself knew that it was not the tax affairs organization that would determine the task for me. look, in your topic, in the beginning, you talk in a way that i agree with 100%, then

we will change your course, you say that in funds all over the world are getting old, and with the longevity of these funds , their obligations will eventually increase and problems will be found for them in practice. yes, this rule is acceptable in general. our problem is that our funds get old at the peak of youth, that's why when i go. actually, the employee who is now officially employed in the organization and is paying me insurance premiums, i calculate that he should pay me insurance premiums for these 30 years, a retirement law comes before the material , he retires in 15 years, so i did the calculations. my insurance is getting messed up, i'm getting conflicted with resources and

i can't manage my expenses . this is my expectation. this is my expectation. now you are clear about the reason for your opposition. tell me why you are against increasing the age when i see that the purchase of the fund is going in such a way that other parametric reforms are not carried out in china. other parametric reforms when i said that i have a limit of 4,480 , i don't have an entry , and this is what you have. if i don't think about getting old. if i don't think that we are a rule, a law let's ask the honorable parliament to establish an interview for the pension fund of the country, at least

, that all the official employees of the contract, who are in the executive administrative body of the country because of the hard work of the government , are not necessarily members of the pension fund. i have to follow your parametric reforms, but i did not understand the reason for your opposition to this issue, which has been raised after several programs as the first parametric reforms that your honorable government has introduced. . mr. doctor, i told you frankly why you are against it, one because of the problem it creates regarding employment, two because of the very insignificant effect it has, that is, this work does not have that much effect on the fund's resources, mr. doctor, the funds, especially the social security organization, need to there is no

law, hey, you pass the law, give him some money , be sure that he will be able to handle the obligations that you have assumed, pay them in about 30-40 years, without any conditions, and you will see that this fund will continue its life in the best way, mr. dr. laws. increase in a way that is the same for everyone you can't increase the salaries of government employees by 20% , let's say the social security fund is also 20%. in the government, the salaries and benefits that they get are so different that some workers have never heard of it, and many of them have never heard of it. when you tell a worker 22 , that means he gets paid 2% more than government workers.

mostly they don't have it. when you go, you approve that the man should master his salary job. the social security fund doesn't have a job . you can adjust it. he is a driver, he is a carpet weaver, who do you want to coordinate with? you came by yourself , you hit me, you loosened up, then you come here, you say, i want to illustrate a law called proportionality, so that his pension will be the same as his pension, so let the insurance there are other levels , his salary will increase like the others , pay more insurance premiums, get more insurance premiums with what you have decided, mr. doctor, now someone wants to retire with 30 years of experience and 62 years of age, now with that assumption, you have two years. which is to be considered , it will not take 33rd, it will take 303 and 5th

if you remember, i think it was 70 or 71 when we changed the retirement denominator from 35 to 30. why? because we believed that the atmosphere of the country requires fresh blood. the retirees should go to the youth force sooner. now we are doing the opposite. do you think it is the right time? do you think that the money that will be given to the organization from this approval can cover it. do you infrastructure. you mentioned the social security system of the community . the social security system is a multi-layered system of support, assistance, and insurance. did you provide those two? is it for the lower class of society? you have the support that if he increases his age to 62 years in such cases, if he wants

to sit back after 30 years, at least he will have social support or social assistance , so he will not be affected before, mr. doctor, the problem of the social security fund is only caused by from the variables inside the law itself. there is no social security, it is a series of external variables , increase in marriage, inflation, celibacy , have you thought about this, mr. doctor, give the money , do what the government's duty is to do in the society , create employment, provide the grounds for marriage , make housing cheaper, you will see that this is nothing. it does not put pressure on the fund, but with the current situation that you have described, it is only in the pockets of the insured , which means that we have reached into the pockets of the weakest workers

in the country. in this , we are withdrawing money from there for the organization's resources . thank you, mr. faizinejad. i, not my government, not my parliament, my insurance fund from the perspective of an insurance fund, this is not me, my government, nor my parliament as an insurance fund and from the perspective of an insurance fund and as the rules of insurance regulations.

see how many people retire and how many people are employed in a year . social security organization, as far as i know i am not in a position to defend the social security organization, i am in a position.

we are recruiting young and unemployed job seekers . in this year, there are statistics used in previous years, which will actually strengthen their opinion that yes, if there is actually a retirement , the same number of people will be recruited in the same ratio, considering that both positions and jobs are vacant. did this happen or not, if indeed so there is an issue in the discussion of our government services , that for every three people who retire , one person is recruited, but it is the same in your social security organization. you see, we are having a discussion in the name of the social security organization , and i am not the defender of the social security organization in this capacity. in this capacity, i am actually the defender of the interests of the workers

, who are here to serve you. it's new, he can say this, but i'm a worker and i'm insured to be paid, it's a problem, you go and fix the debt to the government. please make a version that is consistent with me. see, the result of your conversation was that the retirement that the people who retire will be hired sooner , in order to strengthen this opinion. when my pension is open, there is no way to provide for his livelihood , he has to go

and get a second job. prepare the infrastructure, then come to the social security organization , write a prescription suitable for the insured or the workers , give us his medicine, we will be cured, but with your medicine, we are sick. we will meet again mr. faizi naja jamandi , you will tell us about our time, as i said at the beginning of my speech, i am sorry for our honorable brother , if a special issue does not arise in their mind at some point, the discussion

was this, really, if the insurance funds should be strengthened and in the implementation of the upstream laws will reduce their dependence on the public budget of the government year by year. they must necessarily have parametric reforms, one of these reforms is the change of the year. we must definitely move in this direction, otherwise the situation of these funds will become critical. saying that if the person is early get hired and retire early. we can have recruits because of this recruitment . i said, look again, what happened is that, contrary to the parametric reforms and contrary to the law, people live before they even reach the desired age in the retirement contract and the employment contract. retiring early and leaving is actually taking a second job, actually preventing the work of another young man who wanted to be recruited , while he has his pension.

it is common in companies and institutions because they see that this retired person no longer needs to pay taxes an insurance company wants to attract them, it is in their interest, therefore, it is practically taking an opportunity from the youth to be recruited, this is in the same time frame as defined in the rules of employment and retirement regulations, so he can retire earlier than if ok, definitely the harm is more than the benefit. thank you very much to both guests of the show . good god, especially for the higher program, who accompanied us until this moment , may god protect you, or ali, thank you above all others , wherever we are today, he said coldly.

this is gymnast publishing, we have always tried with we will be at your service with the most up-to-date methods, and today we are going to offer you 60% of your educational resources completely free, just by sending the number 5 to the sms system 30085 , get 60% of your educational resources completely free right now

, 60 of the publishing resources. get gilna as a gift by sending the number 5 to 30085 in the name of allah, the most merciful, and the minister of foreign affairs condemned the terrorist act in moscow. mr. amir abdullahian, while expressing his condolences to the families of the victims of sergey lavrov, the government of the russian nation expressed its condolences for this tragic incident. the foreign minister added: joint and effective fight against terrorism it requires serious and non-discriminatory action by the international community. minister of health in