zaman is operating in dozens of cities in the country. i hope that the space will go in a direction that will go to you . i mean outside of iran . i mean, i want to say that these companies are technological in nature. let's remember one time, the police of the country said, sir, the car that you there are roads . i can't adjust these with the previous fleet . i have to have the latest model benz, which is the reality now that we are equipped with the gramon regulatory body. the technology of artificial intelligence technology should be able to try, at least step by step , to advance the companies that work in this field so that they can if the internet taxi company claims that i have a smart engine , regardless of the price, this smart engine tries to maximize the number of wrists that happen or reach my target number, for example , it should be adjusted. it can have a motor.

to test that smart engine before even going inside it to see what happens, because that internal mechanism may be the technical knowledge of that company, it may not want to provide all of it to us , but that black box, we must have a tool to be able to test it. our problem is the setting unfortunately, gramun is not armed with the appropriate tools for the market that they want to adjust, because they are not armed, they turn to the old approaches. my old cars will most likely fail in this market , the same thing happened when i was in a hurry for options. in your opinion, this regulatory body should be included in the price of the drivers' commission or not at all. basically, i want to say that this is my last point. if i wanted to adjust these, the first thing that would happen would be to make sure that the few companies that are competing with each other are not colluding. the second point is the price change process. you

for hours and days , i used to monitor different origins and destinations and in different cities. i saw that where the share is 10%, the other is 90%, the place where the share is 30%, and the place where the price is 50%, the mechanism works in the same way. someone who is a dominant company has the ability to pressure the price, and another very important point is that now this platform that mr. dr. there is no one of them in particular, we know that this is a super opera, which means that it is working everywhere, that's why it is possible to get a surplus from working in one space, and use this surplus in another business line that is working. let's spend and actually by keeping the price low in one of the things, for example, internet taxi through the surplus that is obtained elsewhere, for example , arranging restaurants and food. actually, what

happens is the arrival of a new actor and competing for a new actor makes it difficult for me. this price war mechanism may even benefit the consumer. the point is that we don't know exactly in which condition we are now? do we have 2 companies that are colluding with each other and keeping the prices high ? we have many companies that have very high prices keeping it low until the new entry does not happen, or we have two companies that are competing with each other under normal conditions, and if a company comes with a new, better technology, it can enter the market and compete. mr. zulfiqari , what do you think? regarding the price interference, i said that the price of the sorting service , that is, the discussion of the commission, does not seem to be much of an issue now, because of the studies in this field. there have been similar cases,

let's discuss the price first, and now you believe that this market is considered a monopoly market. now, no matter which organization it is, for example, the competition council that you mentioned , it should come to enter the rate to the resident first, or according to the formula mentioned by mr. fatemi, i said that entering the rate is the last tool, that is, it is the last resort. other tools should be used, but now. the explanation that i want to give is that, regarding that commission rate , there is at least evidence that there is no such thing as an unconventional number. for example, if they say that 15 % is too high, sir, because they see their own benefit, but when we want

to comment on whether this is unconventional or not, we have to look at all the cases. that company is giving all this talk about technology that costs money and so on. considering all these things , it seems that it is not high, but now what has become a bit more public is the issue of fares , why is the issue of regulation raised here again? there are a lot of providers, but as the doctor rightly pointed out , they do not have the possibility to bargain, which means that we, as passengers or drivers, are never with each other. we do that the system that the companies claim is actually doing this bargaining in an artificial intelligence mechanism. in fact, the system and the mechanism dictates a price to us and we accept it now or we accept, we go on a trip, or

we don't accept, the system will re-calculate. well, for now, the fight is over the one who, for example , is in a hurry with the option to go up, there are a series of complaints. there are some options that i am in a hurry to remove. they say that everyone has gone up. well, here is a bit because these companies that dominate the market in the market, in fact, transport , because the price bargaining mechanism is in their hands, they have a power and a position. they are dominant from this point of view, although they do not directly provide the transportation service, but finally the price is determined under their control. you say the commission is 15% of the fare, that fare goes up in rush conditions rainy night increases in difficult conditions. as a rule

, this company also benefits more, so in my opinion, the first step of regulation is to separate the benefit of that company from this increase. my second point is that in the definition of the market, we are talking about the transportation market. i will say that both the spatial and temporal dimensions are discussed, that is, we say that in this market, the number of drivers and passengers is generally high . this is true, but in terms of locations and at certain times, by the way, a monopoly is created in this market, that is, why, for example, the discussion of the "i'm in a hurry" option is raised, why, for example, the rate increase at night in the air barani, in cases where there are few drivers, then the drivers have an advantage because there are few of them. by refusing to accept a series

of rates in the hope that a higher rate will be offered , it creates a kind of power for those drivers. the issue now. it is obvious and the point of complaint is that when we want to regulate companies that work on the basis of artificial intelligence and technology , the regulatory body itself must be in front of them, that is, it must have the means to regulate them, like you bring me a car engine to see me the mechanic wants to fix it, but i don't have a headache with the engine. when i don't start, the first thing i do is say, mr. driver, give me a switch . you are not allowed to go in this engine because it might be fast. what happened recently with the rush option , my question is, how much did tazirat , who did this, study how the price trend changed ? another point to consider is the fact that the self-regulation that happens between people and drivers

is on this platform itself is working in a certain way, i might say that it is more efficient, sir, to let people and drivers with each other. well, the reality is that if the market thinks that this is a fad and these two existing companies cannot stop the next entry by dumping the price, a third company will come and give people this option. apologies of the taxi competition council, anyone who wants to regulate, should go study first, mr. uber lift in the world , how in the world to regulate it, we can also come and bring serpasi for this reason. this depends on the fact that sir, this is the mechanism of your intelligence, you have to make some changes, the mechanism of the price surge the mechanism by which you increase the price, you have to make changes in it, i'm in a hurry, you should n't take a different commission from it, for example, one solution is this, for example , i took it that if this market

is competitive enough, the companies themselves will reach here, and they will enter, they say, sir. if i let you go up in price together , i will keep my commission low, which means it will stay for you to see the original. two arguments should be separated, referring to mr. doctor's statements, one is that the principle is non-interference, especially in technology-based markets , with the tools mentioned by mr. doctor. they are at least one step behind, it is clear

that because the actor who is on the stage is actually managing this space, now he wants to report his performance, later, for example, the regulatory body wants to be informed and make a decision based on that. this is true, i agree with mr. doctor in this part , i have already said it myself, but now we let them do whatever they want in line with their personal benefit, even at the cost of increasing the public benefit. the set of governance is that the public interest to make sure that the koubis of jadshalos make a loss in a period during eid, and set the price in such a way that they actually lose everyone's interests and

take a very large profit, as well , this is a loss here for a while now, apart from the fact that is this example compatible or not , we don't have a dispute in the example, but here is where the competition regulatory body comes in, that is, it is the duty of the competition regulator. to gain, in fact , the interests of the public, in fact, he wants to destroy the people by the way, this is the entry point, so we can't let them do it by themselves if the prices go up too much under special conditions or on the pretext of special conditions. there is, mr. doctor , you mentioned very well that, for example, before in the rainy season

, there were few drivers, for example, at that time, now when i say that the market was a different market, in this sense, perhaps a summary in a specific format, these are not united now that they have come in the format they have a platform and a specific rule from a center , so the space is different in terms of regulation. this is the duty of the organization to regulate the node, which is based on the principle of non-existence price intervention as much as possible, but monitor the space so that the public benefit is provided, the public benefit here is the requirement that some parts in a series of cases, instead of being the responsibility of the consumer side of the demand side. he said that a part of the burden should be borne by the supplier side, that is, these companies

should actually shoulder it, for example, now the solution is actually a general solution, and the details about the scope of its application will definitely be discussed, for example, this the issue of commission, for example, do we have the right to know a company that is stable in all conditions, for example, a fixed commission. face it should happen that in cases where the price goes up , the number it gets will be higher, or that a rule should be established that this company will reduce a little of its profit in setting those special conditions, for example , when the weather is rainy, why should the rate be, for example, 15%. the conditions are normal, so why are we there just to create motivation? adjust the system in such a way that the price goes up and the passengers, who are a large number of people

, suffer. part of that motivation comes by reducing , in fact, with these exemptions and discounts, the reduction of the commission that the company takes, doesn't the company claim? i am looking for the maximum number of trips , but when it comes to this , it is never ready anywhere, in fact, it is its own thing , and the regulatory body comes to enter in the conditions that, for example, the same rainy conditions that you mentioned are necessarily beneficial. it should not increase with this increase in price. do you think this is correct? what i would like to happen here is a kind of self-regulation, a kind of self-regulation, that is, by increasing the level of public awareness, we can use two platforms in the two platforms that are now in the market. they can show people in the concept of self-regulation, that is, people can tell

my people, in order to serve you in this situation , i will keep my commission here and let our competition go in that direction, it may not go in that direction, and their business is booming during this time. let's do it, if we get the goal of regulation wrong, these businesses may be collected altogether , and these businesses may also be collected, which by the way is very simple, because it is very much based on not being physical, most of them are based. technical knowledge and technology, that's why i'm worried that these rules that we put in place will cause these problems by the way, we have to bring them into a space where they can do this as the forerunners of the regulation, which means that the next time , the managers of these two businesses will sit in the place of me and mr. doctor, and then they will express and justify the

public opinion that we in the situation where the prices are going up, what are we doing as a mechanism ? let's pay attention to this. even the one that can be significant is returning to the passenger and the driver through incentive mechanisms. marketing that the passenger side or the driver should be stimulated they are using these companies, i am not a defender of this in any way, but i say to make the gaming environment competitive, to express in a competitive environment. let's see how many people have died . let's be sure. if we think that another actor with better technology will come, an actor with better technology will come. let's help them go to foreign markets and take them . the expansion of their market will increase their market power. they may be able to negotiate lower prices for me inside the country. because anyway, if this basic technology is scaled up and used in other places, we might

have a better situation in the country, mr. zulfikari, you agreed with this party's option to enter tazirat in this way. not because , at least based on what i know now , i didn't really understand what was the basis of this decision? look, when we say something is too much, we have to say what is more than what is more than what criteria did you use to check that it is too much. yes, if it was too much, then tazirat, in line with his legal duties, should have stepped in and stopped the high-priced sale, but my servant. now, i am not unaware of the current situation of this market. to be honest, i have not yet seen a report published by the people of tazirat, or at least some information. it should be reported that the spokesman of tazeerat came up in the program and explained that the unverified account is going to be investigated in the court and the national branch

, but this balance that has been upset , mr. doctor pointed out the sensitivity of digital markets and platform businesses in such a way. you are in a balance right now, maybe it is not 100% favorable for you, but before you interfere, you should check where the next balance will be formed and at what speed it will be formed then. is that next balance better than the current state or worse? now, at least my observation is that the general public and i agree with you that even some of my friends who were in this field believe that i am in a hurry by removing the option, the welfare of the consumer, i.e. the passengers, did not improve at least, and this claim was made. the claim that

all the trips have become more expensive, if that mechanism has a similar state. is it really a correct assessment that we said that it is expensive, because of this , first of all, it looks at the whole range of these figures , there must be an initial investigation, which is also done in traditional markets, when we want to see a is the price conventional or unconventional ? we should at least have a general estimate of the costs of providing that service . really not having much profit whether it is in the stock market or not. it shows this, at least in the field of carrying cash, but there is another precise point that mr. doctor

has well pointed out. he is using it here, so it is possible that a repressive intervention in the price field will lead to the fact that a big actor whose control should be the issue of the competition regulator, that actor who is bigger has more tools and possibility to harm the well-being of the consumer, happens to be able to kill himself. keep it, but the younger actor should be removed from the game because he doesn't have that network. well , we have about 4 minutes. two minutes are for you, two minutes for mr. zulfaqari . the fact is that i want to emphasize what i have said. do. the first point is that be aware that we are working in a market with a special technology. the regulator must be armed in order to enter here. he must be armed so that he can

verify the claims made by the companies regarding their pricing mechanism and the indicators they research. these are basically checks. he doesn't necessarily have to go inside to see it, but he can check it from the outside. this is a point. the second point i want to add is that you should look at us . we have many places in the country, and my 6-year experience in the competition showed that we have monopoly concerns there. there is also a place in the middle of this internet taxi platforms a sector, a sector which is the technological sector, belongs to the private sector to a large extent, and it has been formed with the efforts of a kind of youth . a place where the government of the private companies, the places that are closer to the government

, they basically dominate, they can exercise the market power, basically the monopoly power. you can see that a lot of well-minded university students came to sit there they are trying to find a mechanism. do this for now, then in this space, they will say, come when the turn is set , there are all these government monopolies, monopolies dependent on the government, but first they will come to us, they may be monopolists, but if the government wants to show that i want to come to you, the government of the competition council anywhere after that, first say yes, i will start with myself, the places that are closest to me, i will start first , and then i will come to you . he wants to face them let's take it this time by the name of monopoly regulation tool , i am not saying that they have monopoly regulation or they don't have the power

to compete or are new, but the relationship between the government and the institutions under regulation . the way that my companions are now in the former competition council , there are unsuccessful attempts by the competition to regulate in the areas that are closer to the government. or being closer to the government, i think this is a subtle point that should be given serious attention . despite the need to support new businesses, despite the need to actually appreciate the young academics that mr. doctor points out, his criterion is youth and old age. and these things are not necessarily, but the criterion is actually the possible damage that reaches the public interest. if a business actually

has a wider range of interests, they are usually considered in priority. now its activists are young, old, public , private. in fact, this is a necessity, so the criteria for the entry of governing bodies, whether it is the competition council, whether it is tzirat, or other places, is the degree of publicness, possibly the losses that reach the public interest. in contrast to what he wants now, in fact, for example , a series of markets now, regardless of the fact that they are close to the government, in fact, these are smaller, so my opinion is that, in fact, all of these are absolutely necessary points to support these things, but in fact , this assurance must be obtained. in fact, it does not harm the public interest. besides, in fact, the development of these new markets based on technology, god willing , thank you very much to both guests of the program, all the good viewers, especially the higher program, for

accompanying us until this moment. god bless you wherever you are or ali gentlemen, god is strong today no matter who we are, you are eternal.

lahijan, the tea capital of iran, the bride of the cities of gilan , lahijan is the destination of many travelers during nowruz. we came from different parts of the country from the city of karaj, the city of laijan is really a beautiful and beautiful city

. we just went to shaitanko. i want to see you again, sheikh saed . we didn't have much time now. god willing, we will go. we came from tehran . here is the area of ​​the pool and shaitankoh. it is very beautiful for nowruz holidays . we came with our family from banu city, kurdistan province. alhamdulillah. north of the cities it's beautiful, it's our second destination that we came to.

lahijan radio and television. this is gymnast publications. we have always tried to serve you with the most up-to-date methods, and today we are going to offer you 60% of your educational resources completely free of charge, just by sending the number 5 to the sms system 300 48 55, 60 % of your educational resources are completely free. receive

now , receive up to 60% of gilna publishing resources as a gift by sending the number five to 3085 in the name of allah, rahman, raheem. hello viewers at 2 o'clock: in the morning, a group of people and students gathered in palestine square in tehran on sunday evening. they condemned the zionist regime in gaza. by chanting slogans against the occupation regime of al-quds, the demonstrators demanded that the international institutions deal with the new crimes of this regime. all palestinians support you

.