we don't know exactly in which condition we are now? do we have 2 companies that are colluding with each other and keeping the prices high? we have companies that keep the prices very low so that new entry does not happen. or we have two companies that are competing with each other under normal conditions, and if a company comes with newer technology and better technology, it can enter the market and compete with them. mr. zulfiqari , what is your opinion ? it is arranged, that is, the discussion of the commission does not seem to be much of an issue now, because the studies that have been done in this field , let's discuss similar things first, for example, the price . now you believe that this market is considered a monopoly market. regardless of which institution it is, for example, the competition council that you mentioned should come. first, let the resident enter the rate or

according to the formula mentioned by mr. fatemi . i would like to say that, regarding that commission rate , it shows at least evidence that there is no unconventional number now, although we are on the demand side. we meet, especially the drivers believe that mr. is high, which means the things that they state, for example, if it is 15%, they say that mr. 15% is too high, because they see their own benefit, but when we want to talk about this issue, whether it is not is it conventional or not? we have to comment on all the cases . after all, the prices of the services provided by that company are all about the technology that costs. yes, we take all these things into account

. it seems that it is not high, but now what has become a bit more public is the issue of fares. why is the issue of regulation brought up here again? and there are a lot of applicants, but as the doctor rightly pointed out , they do not have the possibility to bargain, which means that we, as passengers or drivers, never bargain with each other . which the companies claim is actually somehow doing this bargaining in its artificial intelligence mechanism. its mechanism actually dictates a price to us, and we either accept it, go on a trip, or we don't accept it, the system recalculates, so for now , the fight is over him, for example, i am in a hurry with the option, he will go up a series. there are complaints that the "i'm in a hurry" option should be deleted. they say that it is all gone. well, here

is a bit, because these companies that dominate the market in the market, in fact, transport, because the mechanism of price negotiation is in their hands , they have a power, a dominant position from this point of view, even though they themselves directly serve the transport service. they do not provide but after all, the price is determined under these hands, to put it simply, the possibility of abusing this. there are times when these companies themselves are against increasing the rate, that is, when you say the commission, 15 % of the fare, that fare goes up when i am in a hurry, when it is rainy at night , it goes up when it is difficult. so, in my opinion

, the first step of regulation is to separate the benefit of that company from this increase. a second point is that we are talking about the transportation market in the definition of the market. we say that there are too many drivers and passengers in this market, this is true, but in certain places and times , a monopoly is created in this market . why is it possible, for example, to increase the rate at night in rainy weather, in cases where there are few drivers, then the drivers have an advantage because there are few of them . for those drivers, this situation is now evident and a matter of complaint. that is why we are

when we want to regulate companies that work on the basis of artificial intelligence and technology, the regulatory body itself must be in front of them. it means that it must have tools to adjust them, like if you bring a car engine to me and i will see it. i am a repairman. i want to fix it. because maybe faster than me, i don't understand how the engine works, the thing that happened to me recently with the ajleh option, my question is the punishment. who did this, how much did he study how the price trend changed? another point to consider is that the fact is that the self-regulation that happens between people and drivers on this platform is working in a certain way, i may say, sir. it is more efficient and effective to let the people and the drivers negotiate with each other. well , the reality is that if the market thinks this is efficient and these

two existing companies cannot stop the next entry with a price dump, a third company will come and give this option to the people. he says that the institution he wants will attract customers to him. adjust the grievances of the taxi competition council. anyone who wants to adjust it should first study how to regulate uber in the world and lyft in the world. you have to make some changes , the price surge mechanism is basically the mechanism by which you increase the price, you have to make changes in it , i'm in a hurry, you shouldn't take a different commission from it, for example, a solution. for example, i took it that if this market is competitive enough, the companies themselves will reach here they come in between and say, sir, if i let you go up together in the price , i will keep the same foot, that is, he will stay for you to see the principle of d so that the discussion can be separated. according to

the doctor's orders, one is that the principle is non-interference, especially. in markets based on technology , complex markets where the regulator itself is ultimately a problem in terms of tools, these are all correct statements , i would like to ask a question in parentheses, because pointing out that the competition is now armed, according to mr. fatemeh, in order to enter and regulate this company, what is the competition council ? how about the rest of the regulatory bodies they want to enter this field seriously by reporting these things with the tools mentioned by the doctor. they are at least one step behind, because it is obvious that the actor who is on the stage is managing this space

. this is true, i agree with the doctor in this part, i have already said it myself, but let's put these things in line now. they will do anything for their own benefit, even at a price i am opposed to the expansion of the public interest . basically, the philosophy of the existence of the regulator is that the main task of the governing body is to ensure the public interest , so that the road grills lose money during eid, and price them in such a way that everyone's interests are covered.

we don't have a dispute in the example, but here the role of the competition regulatory body is to enter, i.e. the competition regulator is the duty of the company, so that a dominant player in the market wants to gain unconventional profits for his own benefit with any justification, in fact, the interests of the public , in fact the people if he wants to waste it, this is the entry point, so you can't leave them alone i agree with you that in special circumstances or under the pretext of special circumstances, the prices may go very high. this is possible , mr. doctor. baroni because there were few drivers, for example, at that time, when i say that the market was a different market, in this sense, maybe a summary in a specific format, they are not united, now that

they come in the form of a platform and a specific rule , they receive from a center. the space is different in terms of regulation, so this is the duty of the institution. setting the node to observe the principle of price non-interference as much as possible, but monitor the space, which is negative. by the way, some parts in a series of cases instead of in in fact, all the burden falls on the consumer side, the demand side, and a part of the burden on the supplier side , that is, these companies actually shoulder it, for example, now the solution is actually being expressed in general. the details about the scope of its application will definitely

be debated, for example, this issue of commission, for example , is it right to know that a company that is fixed in all conditions, for example , takes a fixed commission, which happens to be higher in cases where the price goes up. ok, or should a rule be established that this company will benefit a little from its own benefit. reduce the setting in those special conditions, for example, when the weather is rainy, why should the rate be the same as 15% in normal conditions , so why do we just set the system in such a way that the price goes up and the passengers, who are a large number of people, are affected in order to create an incentive? let's get a part of that incentive by reducing it with this exemption. discounts, the reduction of the commission that the company takes , doesn't the company claim that i am looking

for the highest number of trips, but when it comes to this , it is never willing to go anywhere. since your time has run out in this section, mr. fatemi, how much do you agree with the regulatory body coming to enter in a situation where, for example, the same rainy conditions that you mentioned will not necessarily increase the company's profit. what i would like to happen here is a kind of self-regulation, a kind of self-regulation, that is, by increasing the level of public awareness, we can show people this in the two platforms that are currently on the market, in the sense of self-regulation. people say, i will keep my commission here to serve you in this situation and let our competition go in that direction, it may not go in that direction. the reality is that it is true, for example, tababi on chalus road is not a very good example, but if you say that in the old days, the period will go to death, in this time

, their business is booming. if we make a mistake in regulation , these businesses may be aggregated, and these businesses may also be aggregated, which by the way is very simple, because it is not based on physicality, most of them are based on technical and technological knowledge . that's why i'm worried that the rules we put in place will cause these problems by the way, we have to bring them into a space where they can do this as the forerunners of the regulation, which means that the next time , the managers of these two businesses will sit in the place of me and mr. doctor, and then they will express and justify the public opinion that we in a situation where the prices are going up, what are we doing with our mechanism ? pay attention, the 15% that we

say is an incentive to the passenger and the driver. they are using these companies to provoke me to nothing i am not the defender of them, but they say to make the gaming environment competitive, let them say in a competitive environment, see how many dead people. let's make sure that if we think that another actor with better technology will come, an actor with better technology will come, let's help them go to foreign markets and take them. the expansion of their market will increase their market power. they may be able to negotiate lower price conditions for me inside the country, because anyway if this basic technology is scaled up and used in other places, we might have a better situation in the country, mr. zulfaqari, you have a good option with this party, and i agree with tazirat's entry. you were not like this. because at least based on what i know now, i didn't really understand

what was the basis of this decision? look, when we say something is too much, we have to say what is more than what is more, by what criteria did you check that this is too much ? i am not unaware of the current situation of this market, to be honest, i have not yet seen a report published by the people of tazeerat or at least a notification . the spokesperson of tazeerat in the program of coming up and explaining that the unverified account is going to go to the court and the national branch to be investigated, but this balance that has been disturbed is an accurate point, mr. doctor , pointing out the sensitivity of digital markets and platform businesses in such a way that you are now in a balance. maybe, for example, 100

is not desirable for you, but before you intervene , you should check where the next equilibrium will be formed and at what speed it will be formed. now, at least my own observation is that the general public and i agree with your service that even some of my friends who were in this field believe that i am in a hurry to remove the option. the welfare of the consumer, i.e. the passengers, was not improved at least, and this claim was made. again, this claim itself is the subject of debates , that all trips have become more expensive. so, if that mechanism has such a state, is it really a correct assessment that we said it is expensive because of this? first of all, regarding the whole range of these

numbers, a review must be done. first, which is also done in traditional markets, when we want to see if a price is conventional or unconventional, a general estimate of at least the costs of providing let's have that service, what kind of service, in fact, transportation , what kind of service, well, surveys show that almost now, at least, the financial speeds of these companies show that these companies really do not have much profit, whether they are in the stock market or in the it is not a stock market, it shows that at least this is the multi-branching of one of these companies, which in the literature is referred to as the heorite company, and it may use the power and interests that it has in other markets here, so it is possible that there is now a repressive interference in the field. the price leads to the fact that a

great actor who happens to control it should. question let the competition regulator be the bigger player , he has more tools and possibility to harm the welfare of the consumer, by the way, he can protect himself , but the smaller player, because he doesn't have that network, will actually leave the game. well , we have about 4 minutes. your summary is also accurate for mr. zulfari . the fact is that i want to emphasize a few points that i said. the first point is to be aware that we are working in a market with a special technology . the regulator must be armed because here go in and be armed to be able to make the claims that the companies want regarding their pricing mechanism , regarding the indicators that they research , they should check it, not necessarily go inside it, but they can check it from the outside

. this is a point. country. let's take it and my 6-year experience in the competition council showed that we have monopoly concerns there, there is also a place in the middle , internet taxi platforms, this is a part, a part that is the technological part, to a large extent belongs to the private sector, and with efforts, it is basically a youth. if we want a place to be exclusive let's get into it, it might be smart from the point of view of regulatory policy to say, sir, we could first go to a place where the government, private companies, the places that are closer to the sovereignty, they basically dominate, they can exercise market power, basically monopoly power , and regulate them first. let's do it later, let's get to these. after all, they are a place that you can see when you go to their offices. a lot of smart

university students have come and sat there . they are trying to optimize a mechanism. for now, this is what i will say in this space. all of these government monopolies were regulated by the affiliated monopolies there is a government, but first they will come to us, maybe they will be my supporters, but if the government wants to show that i want to come to you, the government of the competition council, say anywhere first, yes, i will start with myself, the places that are closest to me , i will start first, then i am coming to you , this incident may be misinterpreted, or it may even happen that the government is afraid of the growth of this business and wants to stop them. this time, in the name of a monopoly regulatory tool, i am not saying whether they have monopoly regulation or not, the power of competition is lacking. kenan or nova but the relationship between the ruler. intention with institutions under regulation, i think this point is a very important point that we should address if we want to, in the same way that now his companions in the former competition council, there are unsuccessful attempts by the competition council

to regulate in the areas that are closer to the government. or being closer to the government , i think this is a subtle point that should be given serious attention, thank you mr. zulfiqari, the conclusion is that the criterion is actually the governing institutions, despite the need to support new businesses, despite the need, in fact, to reward the young academics who the doctor points out, but his criterion is youth and old age and these things are not necessary, but the criterion is actually the possible damage that reaches the public interest. are being processed. now its activists are young, old, government, private. this is actually a necessity. therefore, the criterion for the entry of governing bodies, whether it is the competition council,

the tazirat, or other places, is the degree of generality, possibly the losses that reach the public interest, as opposed to what it wants now, in fact, for example, a series of markets, now regardless of whether they are close to the government . in fact, these are smaller. so i'm sorry in fact, all of these are absolutely necessary points to support these things, but in fact, it must be ensured that there is no harm to public interests, in addition to the development of these new markets based on technology, god willing , thank you very much for every two guests of the program, all the good viewers, especially the higher program, who accompanied us until this moment, may god protect you

, ladies and gentlemen, now it's time to go to the city of blood supplies, knock the floor, well, well, well, i don't have a check, bye , everyone, bye, no, lady. .

nowruz 1403 with haft sin and haft sarai of all diversity discounts at great iranian house, your seven-seated table is full and your breasts are healthy, happy new year's eve , great iranian house.

parliament elections will be held in march with the new law. today, with the favorable vote of the parliament members, the proportionality of the elections in tehran. it was removed from the draft amendment of the parliament elections law. with this resolution, the objection of the supreme supervisory board to this plan was removed, and of course, part of the general election policies can be implemented in this year's elections. attendees of the change of fate of the 12th majlis election with the vote of the 11th islamic council. another parliament for proportional elections in tehran there is no insistence. end of voting. since about a month ago, the representatives have been insisting on holding proportional elections, and in front of the supreme board of supervision of the good implementation of the general policies of the system, it is against

justice. he knew election and merit selection. we don't have an opinion and emphasis on holding elections with the only saab method in tehran, but considering the opinion of the supreme board of supervision on the implementation of the general policies of the system, the insistence of the parliament, well, now i can leave the final decision in this matter to the council to determine the expediency of the system. recognizing expediency also said half of the time about proportional elections he has doubts and postponed the decision to the future , but the way to approve the amendment of the election law, which was tied to the removal of this clause, has been opened with the measures that took place in the parliament today. he did not have the implementation process , god willing, he will go through the follow-ups for the implementation of the amendment of the parliament election law 7 months before the election, with the concern of implementing

general policies. the election was accompanied by a law that added a pre-registration to the election calendar with its implementation in the first stage. the current law is one of the problems that it is that we only have registration. that is, in the current law , many actions that must be taken in the case of investigation and investigations are concentrated in a limited time. accumulation accumulated there in a continuous manner in a limited time. in addition to the pre- registration of volunteers, the elections are accompanied by several new events. e-registration of candidates, increasing the opportunity to examine candidates' qualification up to about four months, considering the right to complain for disqualified candidates and handling their objections, timely response of inquiring agencies and fair explanation of government facilities and

non-governmental advertising in virtual reality space. destruction of the vital targets of the supposed enemy on the second day of the exercise of the air power of fedayan hareem velayat. at this stage of the exercise, 500-pound bombs were fired by karar drones. previously, these bombs were used by f4 and f5 fighters. unmanned aerial vehicle warfare and implementation of jungle operations are the most successful program of the morning of the second day of the hareem velayat air power exercise. reaching, identifying and photographing the positions of the supposed enemy are the most important missions of the rf 4 aircraft and the mohajer 6 and kamman 12 drones in this phase of the exercise, until the warhead of the arash fasat drone. to find to achieve these identified goals.

the flying planes were controlled by our command , the modern forest plane, the cloud shadow planes, and these were the forest and command control equipment that we used in this exercise. by firing 500-pound bombs in this field, which was designed based on the real scene of the battle, karar uav demonstrated its new ability to destroy ground targets . before this mission, only f-fighters in the air force had launched 500-pound bombs. 4 and f5 were in charge of it. one of the strengths of our air force is that he repairs, updates and optimizes all his abilities with his own hands, and thank god , the ability of the air force of the islamic republic of iran today cannot be compared to the previous years and decades , and it has been greatly improved. monitoring

and reconnaissance operations, electronic warfare and testing various advanced communication systems of the air force, using the secure platforms of wireless and wired networks, were among the other successful operations in this phase of this military exercise. collecting signal information, electronic listening and taking pictures with rf.4 aircraft, mohajer 6 drone and kaman drone. 12, in addition to benefiting from advanced systems , was one of the missions that received the most points in this stage of the exercise based on the evaluation of the judges present in the field. the abu mehdi cruise missile was added to the navy and army's combat organization. the abu mehdi missile with a range of more than a thousand kilometers and the ability to evade radar, which is equipped with artificial intelligence, can

destroy any frigate with high destructive power.