the way of all my candidates, from the individual ones or those who are listed in the list, the impact on the number of seats, as the number of seats in the electoral situation , leaving the seat is one , will not have any effect on the weight of the list, but in our electoral districts and two seats. at the moment, we do not prescribe this military model. thank you very much , mr. jokar. well, mr. arab sadiq, mr. jokar , in your speech, you also mentioned that many countries said that after the second world war , you went towards the proportionality of elections. you said that some of them were tied up in fact, they are changing the method , answer both your discussion and mr. jokar's speech , that is, the same question i had from mr. jokar , i want to ask you if in fact.

i am surprised that our country has suffered a lot from these attempts and mistakes. mr. jokar mentioned a few things. if you allow me, before i get to my petitions and my analysis of this issue, i would like to refer to his statements. that in order to have strong parties

, i apologize for turning this term and trumpet upside down and there is no sound and it is the same mistake that we always pay for. which some people are using now , patriarchy is formed in the elimination of the existence of parties , mr. jokar, i can't now, wherever they need to know, you are forbidden to enter, whether in the tehran elections or in this period, in the previous periods , this period, which in any case asan, dear people, are also aware of this issue, i mean really a lot from these lists that existed , were the parties leading or were the individuals leading, and naturally, when we enter the field of individuals, the role of the people fades, while our parties are also made by the people and not wanted by the people, so this should also be checked in its own place. you mentioned the four

strategies that the supreme leader mentioned last year in relation to the elections . necessarily, the 11th or 10th or 9th majlis is always a mosque in fact, the parliament and the current government hindered. amending the election law, but let's rush into it without mr. jokar saying that infrastructure is not important , i am surprised that he doesn't want infrastructure, by the way , human infrastructure and political culture want us to rush to put a proportionate law, and now, in fact, is it individual and group benefit? and let the crimes be in the middle and fill the political clans that do not have people-oriented functions. by the way

, dear mr. jokar, this is contrary to your order that you say that all directions should be seen. the health of competition and independent participation of the electoral policies that were announced in october 2015, the supervisory board of the council for expediency of the system took issue with these three clauses and declared a contradiction that the parliament did not resolve. this is the point of a geographical discussion . you can't go with these geographical areas that we have now and make a law of proportionality of elections. this actually causes geographic boundaries to fade and create geographic exclusion . there are parts that will not be seen. people's votes and people's opinions. after all, we have political differences, but

it is also contrary to paragraph 10 of the general election policies. clause 10 actually raises the issue of population and population requirements. and according to the announcement of the supervisory board, this is in fact in contradiction with this clause. the competition clause of these four strategies is implemented by me in accordance with clause 15 of the general election policies announced in 2015, which is in accordance with article 110 of the constitution, while there are other contradictions with the constitution. i'm going to tell you, but what does paragraph 15 of the policies say? actually, paragraph 15. the integrity of the elections and the protection of the people's votes and the right to free choice are clear, but we are assigning proportionality in the elections, mr. shayanmehr, what are we assigning the right of the people to the right of the people to the list?

now mr. jokart is the representative of yazd. anyway, there are some differences compared to tehran , but they know better than me that right now we should walk around the city of tehran . ask the people of tehran, even political informants, and tell them how many members of the list. out of these 30 people , you know your representative. believe me , the average will be below 5 people. well, actually, we are assigning to lists that the members of these lists do not know each other. people do not know these people at all. so, with what permission should we assign this right of people's choice to the factions that they are seasonal, and my last question is now in this section , mr. jokare, in tehran, so that it doesn't take too long , i will repeat the election in the whole country in 2018, or in

order not to be a factional issue, the election of 2018, 2019, 2018 , reformists and 2018 fundamentalists, so please tell me what about those who are accountable for the performance of their lists that entered the elections, the people have criticism, what happened to the relationship between the representatives and the people , so we have no accountability because we do not have a people-centered party, and until the parties are formed in the form of a pyramid from the bottom of the society and reach the top of the party parliament made and parties. government made and seasonal parties and ceremonial parties cannot do justice, that is

, they cannot observe justice in the discussion of the law of proportionality. we can hear it. sadek puts forward the sentences well, of course, this does not mean that i agree or disagree, and if he disagrees, he is protesting the current situation. many are being given and they say that people should sit and close the list. in any case, this is the situation now, this is a damage, how do we want to fix this damage, i will tell them how they want to fix this system in any

way in a majority system. and the posts that are given are the votes of many people. it can't be seen, and they themselves point out that in one session of the parliament, for example, with the reformists, they get 30 votes in tehran. what's going on, people, it can't be read anywhere, i said, as the head of the country's internal affairs commission, we addressed this issue. several meetings were held during 3 years in the commission of political parties to comment on the amendment of the election law. of course, i would like to mention that amending the election law

has nothing to do with members and political groups. members and political groups will only submit lists and electoral lists. the rest of the issues of security. the integrity of elections, the discussion of maximum participation and competition in the shadow of having a strong law is a strong law that we followed. we did it. regarding the model of the electoral system, whether it should be proportional or maximal , we discussed this method alone . yes, at first, the guardian council did not accept it, but after the reforms were made, the guardian council accepted the supreme board of supervision for

5 years since the revolution. we used the same electoral system in the past. in all the elections, from the presidential elections to the parliamentary elections, in the rest of the elections, we should continue with the same method, no, we must have a serious change in the matter of elections, so that we can realize those four strategies : the strategy of health and security, participation and competition. to compete in proportional model elections. in constituencies with three representatives and above, three seats and

above will definitely be more serious and people will participate more. it will be possible, otherwise, according to mr. arab sadegh's statement, who mentions the current situation, they say that with this situation , some elders are closing lists, which they are against, we say no to lists that are closed based on the weight of the votes received. they bring and in relation to the total votes given in the constituency , what about the individual votes? the proportion of the presence of the elected names of each political movement and individuals

in the parliament should be determined, and here the list will not be selected from a single list, it will come from many sources, and the parliament will not be of the same fabric. we will have different opinions and ideas in the parliament, and this parliament majlis karam from a list, we in the parliament should all have the same idea, that is also acceptable, thank you very much, mr. jokar, mr. sadiq arab, i can hear you . it is good, but what is happening is contrary to these words, that is, i am using it, i say that it says. independent people, first of all , independent people, tell me, where

do i present the candidates and how can they compete with parties, groups, factions, maybe the godfathers with money and media, influence and facilities, they will be removed . this is not the case in the current situation, that is, you. if it is a majority, i will say this. the second point that is here now is to refer to the current election, because i am referring to it. after all, we had several lists in tehran and we saw in the whole country that this the elections were not like the elections of 1998 and 1994, and finally, 5 of these lists in tehran, 4 of these lists came up, but the list that they may have in mind, that list could also be voted. come on, mr. jokar, you must remember that the proportional election model everywhere in the world, especially

in western europe, which is actually the cradle of this law , removes below 5%, and the list you are thinking of got 50,000 votes, and with 50,000 votes , finally this law would also be removed, so it is an example , but mr. jokar, the internal affairs commission, in fact, the country and the council. i have a question for you if we are writing a law and we are writing a downstream law, is this law that we are writing compatible with paragraph one. 10 and 15 i explained the general policies , i explained the legislation with the general policies, and it contradicts the principles of the constitution that i will mention now, and you tell me how we want to solve the article 85 of our constitution, the dignity of representation. qaim knows that when you

bring up the list and the group, you are actually violating the constitution. leave an interpretation or an amendment for the constitution, the 6th principle of our country's constitution pay attention to the words from a legal point of view. alhamdulillah, you are a lawyer. you interpret the people's votes based on the general votes of the country . please pay attention to mr. shayanmehr's model of proportional elections, we have shared a part of this right, in fact , we took away the people's right to choose, we gave it to the administrators of the list to

choose these people in your list. come check it out and after if this list gets votes, now based on the order of this list, 5 people, 10 people can send a percentage , so this is not based on public votes, a part of it will be based on property votes, and the second issue of article 62 says that this vote is not direct by people's direct vote. proportional pattern model, principle 6, 64, a prediction of this, now you should actually see the prediction in the proportionality election law. you see, we are dealing with article 53 of the election law, it is definitely necessary and it is too late, but if we are talking about proportionality law , what is our prediction regarding article 64 regarding religious minorities? principle 13, as i said, you don't you can act on the basis of clauses of the principle of leadership authority for the general policy of the system

, you cannot act on the basis of it and against it, and if you. you have now, in fact , the lists that i mentioned, or even our parties, in the existential and functional dispossession of parties, gangs are formed , they do not have financial transparency, they do not have a people-oriented mechanism, they do not have a people's order, they do not have an organizational relationship with the people in the current factions. the parliament is not present. see , there is another point that we should mention in this matter regarding the current situation of the country. we have a political scene, political arrangement, mr. jokar parties and the tastes in the country are not only fundamentalists and reformists , they are political tastes, and these are not reflected in the parties. you are eliminating them . why not, because we do not have popular parties, the radicals and extremists get a chance to appear with an analysis that

will be briefly mentioned. after this , please allow us to go to yazd and listen to mr. jokar's answer to the land that i had for a year, so that you can explain how the independents can actually represent in the representative elections in this proportional method. have a fiancee and people who individually they appear in the elections, how can they participate in these proportional elections, mr. shayan, mr. arab sadiq, it is interesting that they work and operate in the house of the parties, but they do not believe in the parties. it is very interesting . we wanted to correct it . we wrote a letter to the general secretary of various parties that now have licenses in the country. only one general secretary answered us

. it's very interesting. a general secretary, i don't know what this house of torture does, what is its job , really, if the house of torture does not accept torture, then what is the existential philosophy of aza khan? in any case, we are working there . the second point of mr. arab sadegh is that he is protesting against the existing situation , he is also protesting against the model of the proportional system, that is, he is now saying that he is protesting. sir, the most read discussion is giving lists, so people are not directly voting for you at all, people are voting for farz, people are voting for lists. in any case, this cannot be denied, on the one hand, we say that we are against another model, and at the same time, we say that the current model

does not work either, so we have to give a new model or a combination of these two models. it is your request that our people know exactly how to act and how to cast their vote in the ballot box. the 64th article of the constitution that he mentioned is related to the number of constituencies and the number of representatives that every 10 years. one time, 20 representatives will be added to the number of parliament members based on the constitution, and we have this plan on the agenda of the parliament now that 40 representatives should be added. which is based on reform and elective areas. it has nothing to do with amending the election law. it is related

to the improvement of the selected ouzes and increasing the number it is the representatives who express article 64. the rights of all nations should be considered based on the number of population, population distribution, political situation of the region, number. the representatives of your service will be appointed and therefore, see, we said that we should defend the current situation we have in the constituencies with high seats, but at the same time be critical of the same situation. this is not acceptable . we must defend the situation. existing and the new situation that we want to create and the new plan and idea that we have in the field of proportionality , but we reject the current weaknesses, mr. arab

sadiq agrees, he says that we have a weakness, we have a problem, people do not get their own votes, their representatives are not directly elected, but they are voted for the list. it is also not acceptable, but in relation to the discussion of the singles, please see the singles , please let us know that our singles are in the first place in the proportional pattern of the singles' votes and the votes of the lists that mr. arab sadiq mentioned now, for example, if a list gets 15% of the votes, that list is eligible it is not accepted , he can participate individually. the total number of individuals in that constituency is divided among all the correct votes of the individual and the lists and the lists, hit

the number of representatives, the number of seats in that constituency is determined by the individuals and they look from the beginning of the list until the number of shares that the individuals have in the list will be determined. political and they will be determined based on their weight up to 30 people that we have set as a model in tehran , so no, we do not have a discussion about a specific list , we are in the conditions of the list, well, the fundamentalists have several lists and it is at your service that

we are not seeking to have a specific list of reformists a special person should vote, but we are looking for all the people's votes to be counted and the people to feel that they have their own representative in the islamic council. to defend their rights, and therefore i will give this to you, god willing, if i was able to answer mr. arab, because we started with mr. jokar, we don't have much time at the end of the program. thank you. well, unfortunately, mr. jokar did not answer almost all of my questions and objections while being respectful, and mr. with the translation that there is no opportunity and i have some issues that i need to sum up. this law itself, that is, article 53, this law that you wrote in the parliament contradicts itself, that is,

it comes somewhere for tehran. you say that two-stage comes somewhere in article 53, you say proportionality, which is proportional and two-stage at all , contradicts principle 10 and the general policies of the system in clauses 1, 10 and 15 . you didn't mention that we have contradictions in the constitution . yes, but in general and outside the political system of our country, there are unstable political deadlock coalitions that create proportional elections, that is, coalitions. fragile ones that are seasonal and seasonal and will face problems in the parliament and in the parliament. this fragile coalition, which is actually an example in italy , you can see. this instability will cause problems in the passage of bills, unlike many stable coalitions that are stable.

there is a damage that you can check in the system of a german country, a system that, for example , has 38 one voting list and 42 another list, which is now one of the debates that people can no longer leave the ruling party in many situations. there are 14 cases in germany. it had the case and the last clause which is the most important look at the small coalitions, you see them as bargaining power, and this bargaining power is based on the demarcation and distribution of power and the approval of seats. sometimes it is against the interests, that is, if i want an excuse, a coalition a has 38 votes and a coalition b has 42 votes, a 20% coalition will be found, and this 20% coalition can cause damage and other issues, and i thank mr. mohammad sadiq jokar the elected representative of the people and mr. mehdi arab sadegh, now

we had mr. jokar from yaz studio and i would like to thank mr. arab sadegh in the studio in tehran and you too for following the above program until the end again, may god protect us above the dream , higher today, wherever we are, behind us.

the hours of the holy shrines of the imams of athar, peace be upon them, of mosques and takkayeh in iran and iraq. tonight , they are hosting the believers on the first night of the holy month of ramadan . at the same time as the martyrdom days of imam, peace be upon him, his shrine in najaf ashraf is dressed in black and hosts pilgrims and mourners. razavi courtyard and palace are also prepared to host pilgrims on qadr nights. iranians hold the largest shab al-qadr ceremony in the holy shrine of razavi. on the occasion of the coming days of the martyrdom of maul al-muhaddin imam (peace be upon him) and shab

appreciate every tradition