in many meetings, they emphasize this issue and repeatedly follow up the president's scientific experts . this has really caused productivity to become the main concern of the government. this is a very valuable work. this is to make the promotion of productivity the dominant discourse in the country's elite society with the events that are being held and the various programs organized by the organization. this is happening with the cooperation of the vice-chancellor and other institutions, and on the other hand , it should become the dominant discourse in the society , that is, we should be a knowledge society. to have a foundation, we must have a productive society , but regarding the role of knowledge-based companies, i think that knowledge-based companies can play a role in three areas. the first area of ​​technological development is innovation. in order to improve productivity in many places in many fields, such as energy , mining, agriculture, sometimes

we also need to develop technology and diversification. now i make a difference between technology and diversification. you say that you are defining in these three stages, tell me how operational it is now , how is it looking at the horizon ahead. i'll tell you about the case, then i'll come back and continue, so firstly, the development of technology and innovation, which is a very important issue . we did not perform well in these fields in the area of ​​productivity, which has a lot of work to do. the second point that scientists' companies can play as an elite society is the issue of demand. beneficial demands are a very important issue that must be formed in the elite society, and the third point is the presentation of governance models. i if i want to give an example, let's assume that we need governance models to improve water efficiency in our agriculture.

we have a civilization that can carry out this beneficial improvement, which i will mention in detail in the rest of my speech . there is a reason why our scientists' companies are not very active in the field of demanding and presenting governance models, which i will mention in the rest of my speech . in the development of innovation technology , daneshmunan companies are doing very well and strongly, which means that we can definitely say that there are 80-90 problems to improve productivity in the field of technology and innovation. the reason why productivity is low in some of our industries is not the development of technology, but the diffusion and absorption of technology. that is, the companies of our scientists are developing technology, but this has not been published and absorbed by the industry, especially in the industry where we have government departments. governance is sovereignty, which means we have to have mega laws. we

should make it so that our companies have no choice but to move towards exploitation. on the other hand, there should be a necessary incentive for knowledge-based companies to enter let's have this field. you see, companies of scientists are quite capable in terms of motivation and knowledge. what prevents entry? tax incentives. if we have good financial models, that's exactly it. if we design financial incentives for daneshmanian companies, daneshmanian companies. strong people enter this field, but we have another obstacle, and that is our financing in the field of productivity . power plants our electricity, well, the efficiency is low, we say, mr. ramin power plant, you should improve, for example, in the field of cooling, well, he says, i want millions of dollars for this to happen, now what should we do to finance it, those are the financial models i said.

mr. p. i want to go to the point that mr. farjalai said, that is, now the challenges that arise in strengthening the companies of daneshmouni in increasing productivity, and of course i want to get your answer. let me ask first about the potentials that we have done little how is our current situation in various fields, according to the statistics of the last one or two years. some of our sectors are experiencing good growth, of course, this does not mean that they are in a favorable situation. when we talk about growth, it means that there was growth compared to the last two years. well, our oil sector has experienced a double-digit growth. the information communication of the is industry has experienced a good growth, it is also double-digit, or for example, let's assume that in the field of mining, we had good growth in recent years , in the same way, in the field of services, because the corona period is finally over.

it caused our service sector to drop a bit , now that the restriction has been lifted, it has finally found a jump in the growth of some sectors , unfortunately, our weakness is the agricultural sector. maybe two things are very key, the first thing is to create motivation, and the second thing is to create stability and predictability, that is, if the person who is ruling is able to do these two things, he will make the rules, then we will move forward. i

will give an concrete example now. each of them, mr. peshwai, as the head of the national productivity organization, how far do you think we have gone, what are the challenges? we should pay more attention to it in the program. if i want to say one topic, it is exactly the issue of motivation . i will open it up for you with an example. you see , we now have an issue in the country called water coolers. we have 20 million water coolers in the country now, which consumes a significant part of the country's electricity in the summer. the motors used in these coolers are outdated motors. very traditional induction motors with very high consumption and inefficient. well, we have scientific companies in the country right now that are making electric motors with very high efficiency in the name of the new generation bial dc motors, which can drastically reduce energy consumption by 1/4 and 1/5th compared to what is used

in normal motors now . the technology of this work has been done and its capability has been created. why is this not tied to the market? the reason is that because the price of energy in iran is very, very low , you and i do not prefer to go and buy that 6 million engine in our homes to reduce energy consumption. why? because when i want to calculate, i talk like this, for example bill i give the right to the people, the truth is, i see the main problem is that we could not

implement motivating rules in the governance system, which means that you may say that price intervention is not a good method , the vulnerable groups are actually harmed by the weaker sections of the society. there is no problem, we can do something very simple, say that a fund will provide the initial funding, that is , put up support plans, but on the condition that it is based on energy saving, it will go back to that investor , if we can create this game. that is, the investment that comes to productivity plans optimization costs, we need to find an approach to guarantee the efficiency of cooling, and this is not a difficult task in my opinion. we were able to create that motivation, and that is the time when there is no need for the government to directly enter into the issue of tenure and implementation of productivity plans . mr. farajullah, if we want to check now

, we always have one end of the story in the issue of knowledge-based companies, and one side of the flash goes towards the increase of knowledge- based companies, although beside this issue. important important topic it is more about the quality , let's talk about how much it can be effective in improving the utilization of different fields, which is the topic of tonight's special discussion, the quality of the services of the knowledge bases or their view on each of the topics we are talking about tonight. the number itself is another concept, it shows that the country has a series of elite people who are moving towards solving the problem through research and advice. it has increased in the country and the influence and presence of the elites in the society has increased. we are seeking to increase the quality of academic companies and their impact both in the field of science and technology of the country and in our knowledge economy

. well, one of the serious components of our academic economy is this field of productivity, as i mentioned in my previous talks and mr. dr. mention them well. now, our scientists' companies are not able to find entry in the field of productivity as they did in other fields. what is the reason? when you pathologize , we return to the fact that the same financial motivation for. i do not mean that scientific companies have not been established they don't have money to enter this field, why do they have money, but the economic model is not a good model , see, let me give you an example, the same point that mr. doctor does not mention about water bags, mr. farajeh, let me give you an example, for example, we are talking about water coolers. don't we have the private sector to come and invest in water coolers and change and replace them? we definitely have gas heaters. change it and replace it with higher efficiency, why do we have it? but the question for danesh baniyan company

it will be created, he says, if i go and pay 3 million to 4 million from my own pocket and change these water heaters and replace the heaters , what is the return on my investment model? who wants to return my money , mr. dr. farjalahi, there is a missing link here , both in your talks and in mr. peshwari's talks, there is a link, all the links are spinning together , moving forward, we will reach a missing link , where is it, the ruling model. look, in the continuation of my example , i wanted to say this. for example, suppose that if we tell a company of scientists, you go and see the total number of electric motors that exist in the country. electric motors , maybe 60-70% of the country's electricity is spent on electric motors . refrigerators, clothes washers are big industries. that company of our knowledge in that reduction of consumption , do we allow that company of our knowledge to sell that saved electricity at a free price? if we went

to the field of agriculture, we created water efficiency and halved water consumption, are we allowed to that farmer or that company ? we know that it saves water it can be sold in the energy market and in the water market at a free price and the money can be returned . this is being done now . water, for example, the gas company in the field of gas, we are now implementing these governance models as a pilot , we are implementing them in some places, for example, in the brick industry, with the help of friends, a five-six-way agreement with a very, very advanced economic model that the ministry there is defense, there is the gas company, there is the yazd governorate, there is the national productivity organization, there is the scientific deputy, there is the department it is private, we came up with a model that happens to be our bottleneck, which is the model of governance and financing , it is being provided here , mr. peshwai, this model that mr. farjalahi is saying now, we are operating in different areas, or

we are preparing to implement it. we have made progress in various areas, especially those you are mentioning now . in the 90s, this tahr collection was lagging behind. i will come back. it says that we have started and my indicators show this it shows that we have grown compared to the past , the backwardness you mention, because it requires a strong and powerful start, of course, with a fast beat, and more importantly, its stability means that we can sustain this for the coming years. let's keep it because every year we have a growth in the productivity index, repeating that growth the next year will be much more difficult and new measures are needed. we must be able to mature the governance system along with this productivity growth. if we can't do this , the main key is that we can

constantly improve the participation in the national productivity movement every year. if we want this growth to be sustainable, and this requires two things very seriously, in fact , the governance group should invest in the method of motivation and motivational models, and secondly, stability and predictability . we have samples now, but the volume we need to be able to maintain this growth for the coming years is much more than this and requires an inter-departmental movement and even inter-governmental coordination if we want to continue this, mr. fajarai . which areas are going strong? these governance models, which areas should be planned more precisely, see a very important point after the mention. and that is that we in the scientific vice-chancellor, as the headquarters of the command of science, technology and

economy of scientists in the country , are heavily investing in the presence of the people, so that we can have the presence of the people, just as hazrat agha said, the presence of the people is the initiative of the people and the seriousness of the people in our model. let's come and all the models that are being designed are based on the presence of the people and based on the people's cooperatives . we gave that and we are trying to implement the pilot. to be fair, all the government bodies have supported us well so far. we couldn't run good pilots to show that these motivational models have worked. if we did this , the government would definitely come along. maybe it wasn't the government's concern in the last decade, but now it is a serious concern of the government in this area. therefore, when a model is designed, a successful pilot will be implemented. can all government bodies be convinced to accompany and cooperate with this model like the

one i presented to you regarding the reduction of gas consumption in the hajar industry, honestly, all government bodies from the office of mr. boss. the president of the gas company, all government departments are working with us to make it happen, but regarding your question, a very important point is that everywhere our model is more attractive, the speed of our progress is stronger and faster. for example, in the field of energy, i think we we are working well now, because there is a reason , one of the reasons is that there are scientific companies on this side, and on the other side, our audience is important, for example , when our audience is industries. it is sometimes easier to work because we are in our industry, but the number of them is limited, but when you go into the field of agriculture , the number of people who are your audience increases greatly. he finds that it is very difficult to justify them, their extent is very large, so the work becomes more difficult where the model is more attractive, the audience is more involved, and the governing body is more involved

. we are moving forward, which means that the ministry of oil and the ministry of energy are really supporting us in these areas . we are trying to implement these pilot models in other areas such as agriculture with the ministry of jihad and mining with the ministry of defense. let's move forward with the same speed when we say mr. peshwai's mine, there is a point saying, for example, we are in a good situation in the field of mining. look, growth is different from the optimal situation. we are very behind in mining and agriculture. this growth that we have must jump, otherwise we cannot really reach the optimal situation. the situation we are in is a jump. we have to move forward by leaps and bounds , otherwise we are very far from the ideal situation. now here are the reasons why, for example, why we are in the situation in mining in agriculture , one of the reasons is the attractiveness of raw materials. mr. pishaei should benefit from this article

let's continue this movement of leapfrog. people's participation, let's see how productivity improvement can connect each of these circles and how it can lead to a jump in production, besides using people's potential. basically , this experience that i have serves to improve productivity. i would like to tell you that there is an experience of countries that have about 15 years of 20 years of stable productivity growth in this asia. we have a country in east asia that has approx. it has had 15 years of stable growth in productivity vari has brought inspiration to his own people. the experience we are looking at goes back to a topic called the national productivity movement, that is, you are in different strata, from the woman or man who is at home and is consuming to the producer who is in the

the factory produces, the operation that is working on the agricultural land must be able to move. by the way, one of the serious issues here is the issue of education from a young age, which should be the method of investment , and rome's plans . participation should increase. in addition to the issue of motivation that my doctor mentioned, i also mentioned that we need a series of initiatives . in the ministry of science, research and technology, we established a plan called the university plan to determine the productivity of each of our universities. now, national universities at the national level and the national institutions of provincial universities at the provincial level are tasked with directing one area or one province. help for productivity issues, in fact , to solve productivity issues or a joint plan

we had with the scientific assistant with the cooperation of mr. dr. in the field. the institutions in charge of the sector, for example, the ministry of jihad of agriculture, brings its issues , we call them. we, the companies of the scientists, can present a plan in response to that issue. in a process of arbitration, which has been done so far this year for three areas , the field of agriculture, the field of transportation and as we are talking about the energy sector, we have received more than 400 ideas from daneshmouni companies to solve problems. and some of them are now close to commercialization, which means that the work has progressed so well that the product is ready to be presented to the market. we are very worried when this goes on the market, in fact, that will happen. the attraction that my doctor said should happen as we are doing there, we hope that it will happen if we can be successful in this project and similar projects, i am sure that

by increasing people's participation in the national productivity movement , we will definitely be able to achieve our goals in the field of let's make a point. now, for example, in different years , in the previous years, if you look, the government provided various support to the companies of scientists , different support plans, now, after this. how many years of these companies to such a large extent they were able to be independent from those preferential connections and types of support and to enter that competitive environment, to be able to play a role in that productivity index or the issue of improving productivity . scientists are not registered or not registered, but those who are registered in the country's system of scientists , we have about 10,000 companies, about 70% of them are startup scientists' companies, and 30%

are technologists and innovators who are doing their work independently in these 70 the percentage of companies of young scientists i have to point out an important point, and that is that we in knowledge-based companies, if we can secure the market, we should create a good governance model so that they can enter the market, enter the competition , enter the field of exploitation, maybe they don't need the support of the government at all. . why are we going to support the companies of daneshtunan? first, the deputy's support has become extremely intelligent. now, maybe i can tell you that out of 70% of the companies of young scientists , for example, suppose that 30 or 40 of them need the support of the vice president. the rest have the ability to stand on their own feet. those who they need the support of the academic vice-chancellor, the reason is that they are still not being connected to the good market. if they are connected to the market , they don't need the government's support at all. they can easily follow the path themselves. what we are doing in the scientific vice-chancellor

is to remove the obstacles from the front and the back of the knowledge base. if we remove the obstacles , the companies will know how to travel this path quickly. how much has been fixed and how much is left? see, you can't really say these numbers and figures, but tell me which ones you have fixed and which ones still. see, for example, assume that export. we have doubled the number of companies of our scientists has increased to a good extent. the presence of academic companies in the country is increasing, which shows that one of the obstacles is being removed. but maybe the main obstacle is the presence of our knowledge companies in the market. if we can build a good market in the country and abroad, something that maybe in the last decade regarding the export of our scientific companies for various reasons, now the decisions of the corona government and for various reasons. we could not use it well. if we can create domestic and export markets for scientific companies let's say we did the biggest obstacle removal in front of them. mr. peshkaei, i think

we have about seven or eight minutes , please give me some time management. now, the 7th plan has made a mistake . what does the 7th development plan say about the issue of productivity and improvement of that index and the things it has considered. executive guarantees as it should be seen for that during the term. according to the platform that should be provided in the country through the interaction of various organizations and institutions, can this issue be realized? see, in our 7th plan, the most important document that we have above the 7th plan is general policies the 7th plan is announced by the supreme leader in the first paragraph of the general policies of the 7th plan. the serious issue that we have is the realization of 8d economic growth with an emphasis on increasing the productivity of production factors, which i mentioned where the general goal and main priority of the 7th plan is this issue. let me make a complaint here , the amount that was emphasized in the general policies

was not taken care of in the text of the 7th plan, and we actually announced this before, both to our loved ones in the government and in the parliament, who are working hard on this plan. finally, the amount that was demanded by hazrat agha in the seventh program general policies in the text now. but in any case, now we are serious about productivity in several places . one task that exists in the field of knowledge foundations is to increase their contribution in the national movement of efficiency and the incentives that should be created for them. the second issue is a very key issue and maybe one of the achilles heels of our country's economic system is the lack of a national productivity system, which is in article 11 because the plan has not yet been approved. in fact, the draft of that legal program has not yet been approved by the guardian council because it is not yet final. it is the issue of the national productivity system, which divides the national work in the field of interest and between the institutions.

the government, the private sector, the regulators , the policy makers actually do it, and in some places there have been content entries, for example, let's say there was a content entry in the field of water efficiency in particular, or in the matter of public companies, which is one of the significant initiatives of the 13th government. it was done and it is also a serious matter to connect the remuneration of the board members of state companies to their productivity performance today . in fact, until now i am at your service for 200 reports we issued an operating permit for these companies, and in that evaluation task force, the remuneration of these companies was also determined . these are the few companies that you mentioned just now, what will happen to them in order to reach those ceilings

? about 10. we had companies that didn't cooperate with us, and we issued them a zero record according to the law, and the bonus of their management board members was zero. some of them are actually in the evaluation work group's turn, which, god willing, will be done there. this plan is one of those plans that motivates it has also created why because the government companies that work well for up to 3 months, in fact, salaries those who are weaker can get a reward of 2 months, one month and those who are much weaker can get 0. by the way, a significant number of them are those who actually had zero or half of our salaries, and here is a plan that is motivating and helps them to move, considering the share they have, 10% in the gross national product actually has a share, it was a big move that god willing will continue in the seventh plan , i think one minute and 30 seconds and the knowledge bases, now the scientific vice president of technology on the topic of improving

the utilization of the summation. see our belief in the deputy the science is that a strong government is a government that has a strong private sector by its side. a strong governance is a governance that can use people's participation in governance in its development as much as possible. in the scientific vice-chancellor, we are trying to make the maximum use of the capacity of elites and companies of scientists and the maximum use of people's participation, people's presence, people's initiative, and we are trying to design these models in such a way that the maximum capacity the companies of scientists and people should be promoted in the field of productivity. thank you very much mr. farjalai, i know you have a final point, a short summary about the growth of production, now the jump in production, the participation of the people , the issue we are witnessing this year, 30 seconds, as i said, the most important intervention and the most key intervention that we currently have for the field of productivity is the design and implementation of the national productivity system and

the goal. there is also an increase in the participation of different groups of people in the field of exploitation. we hope that we will be able to advance this great goal in the seventh program . do you think 1403 this ideal that you mention will be operational to some extent. yes, the design work has been done now and it is in the process of review in some of the councils that should do this work do it we hope that this approval will be expedited and we will be able to do this. this draft is now in the supreme administrative council. we hope that at the beginning of the year, our plan will actually be an answer to the task that the supreme leader has set for the country and the government. mr. pisaei , thank you very much for your explanation, mr. farjalai. amir al-mu'minin, peace be upon him, you participated in a special news interview . i bid farewell to both nobles .

hello ladies and gentlemen, i am alireza hashemzadegan i am with you with the world today. in the first case of tonight's program , we analyze the continuation of demonstrations in jordan in protest of the relations between the government of this country and the zionist regime. in the second case , we go to the student strike in canada, which is related to the performance of justin trudeau's government