produce liquids. the development of water resource purification technologies is one of the goals pursued by scientists last year and many products were put on the production line based on the needs of the industry. at a time when there is water but it is scarce , the young technologists of our country came to the aid of this water scarcity last year with technologies that aimed to use water optimally in industry. indigenous coagulants are one of these technologies that amirkabir university researchers brought to help with dehydration. polyacrylamides are polymer molecules with very high molecular weight for any dispersion be added this causes different parts of this molecule to stick to the impurities of that substance suspended in water. it makes it heavy and

makes the water clear in a very short time. the ozone generator is another service of the young technologists of our country to the water industry in the country. a zero to 100 iranian device that returns large industrial effluents to the industrial cycle only with the help of ozone gas. for example, factories that have colored effluents using ozone generator systems. in fact, this color will fade and any micro-organisms in the water will be used for agriculture and other purposes. it can be used, especially now that we have a water crisis, this device actually plays a great role , according to the ministry of energy, more than 4 billion cubic meters of water are used annually in the country's industry, now and with the help of these technologies, 30% more than this from 4 billion cubic meters of water. by recycling

industrial waste water, it is not wasted. samia nasser, radio and television news agency, today is monday, the 13th of farvard, the 21st of ramadan and the 1st of april. dear ones, the noon time in tehran will be 128 minutes and the maghrib azan will be at 184 minutes. thank you very much for your company . have a nice day. .

iranian coach sharaf iran has a telegram with the country is playing, why are you setting prices this month ? your question is an interesting question. you are a football player's board of directors . we do not agree with any kind of treatment. as an opponent of handing over the regulation of the market and its authority to snaf, i would like to start with mr. hassan khani and ask him why he is against.

what is the point of handing over the powers of market regulation to the chamber of guilds? in the name of allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, i offer my greetings to you, dear mr. bozar nasr, as well as the honorable audience, article 17 of the trades law states that the guild must follow the rules. the regulations and legislation and pricing determined by the government must be adhered to within the framework of the governance structure, so now the issue is not that we entrust the pricing to snaf. let's entrust the supervision to snaf or to the sovereignty of this dualism. you see, this duality is not a complete duality, and the governance of both has a responsibility towards each other and beyond this towards the people, that responsibility is actually to maintain the peace of the market and the welfare of the people, of course, in a situation where the benefits of the legitimacy of the guilds should be maintained, this is not a debate, but there is a conflict of interest here. that conflict of interest

this means that if you actually leave the complaint mechanism to snuff, for example, if a person complained about a taxi, the authority to handle this complaint will be on its own. put a taxi here, something will probably happen that may actually destroy the rights of the people there. the point is that besides the government should not interfere, but also the government's supervision. a country that, like the conditions of our country, is mainly involved in sanctions , inefficiency, inflation, and some corruptions , however, it is unwilling to leave this space without governance. he may run away, it may happen, so my point is that we should base it on a duality, which is in fact fairness and governance . the law, whatever the law has determined, the path set by the law should not be deviated from, but at

the same time, according to the interpretation of the supreme authority leading the government's excessive interference in the market and actually taking over the duties. in fact, it can lead to bad events, as we see in some trades in some markets. my point is that this conflict of interest should be managed and conflict of interest should not occur, as the people want the dignity of the people. people, in fact, the people's rights should not be lost in the middle under the pretext of non-interference of the government. de-governance should not happen. this is my first point. clearly , the government should enter the market or monitor and only enter because these powers are a little too much , that is, we in the previous programs. we also talked about it, now the regulation of the market, the market, the supervision of the market, this is all supposed to

be entrusted to a part of me. have a market, see. supervision it has been and has been monitoring since long ago. my opinion is that the supervision of the chamber of guilds is not enough for the supervision of your government. no matter how many guilds there are , they still need a supervisory body . there is also a clear example. a guild actually happens, for example, a person goes to a gold shop and complains that this gentleman sold me fake gold, if the reference of this complaint is the gold guild. the people's rights cannot be given in any way , the people cannot be given, anyway , there must be a sovereign military behind the story to make rules and monitor you, that's why. in fact, in history, i think on may 12 , 2012 last year, mr. baradaran wrote a letter to

mr. nod farahani, actually to snaf, that a sales invoice for gold must be issued to every individual. who sells gold in your country now, when a real person goes, in fact, this experience happened to me when he goes to a gold shop and then gets confused for any reason or anyway, for example, they sell him fake gold , where should this person complain? he should complain to the guild , of course safar cannot be responsible, thank you very much mr. hasankhani, mr. rostgar, why do you agree that the government should hand over these powers to you, who are the snafu chamber? mr. hassan khani pointed out that in the field of supervision , they don't see much of your hand and they don't agree that it should be in your team, in the name of allah, the most merciful

, the most merciful. i offer my condolences, god bless our people. union and snuff rooms, before we should know the true meaning of the position of union snuff rooms trade unions, trade unions, what is defined about the union and chambers of association of people's organizations that are non-profit, that is , in doing their homework. they are legal and implement non-profit laws and oversee the economic behavior of trade unions and economic enterprises. basically, one of the missions and one of the laws that require the union and discussion chambers is inspection supervision. if

we take inspection supervision from asalaf chambers or to downplay their role is definitely not beneficial for the people . the main subject of follow-up. they talk about inspection supervision. we should strengthen this inspection supervision which is entrusted to the unions according to the law. when this inspection supervision can be effective, the real support for this union and the snob chambers is what is being said today and this. our dear is bringing up the supervisory role of the government on all organizations. and the organs, all the so-called non-governmental organizations, which

have no contradiction at all with the role of the government and the so-called special role of the regulatory bodies, exactly the government should have an opinion that the government should have supervision. and executive work and operational work must be done by the union and sna chambers. if this does not happen, we have no control over our markets. this does not contradict the role of the government. we say that the government should do its own work , but the main supervision should be carried out by the unions themselves, because they have a more detailed understanding of the issues, so to speak. let's review one more time exactly a memorandum that was proposed last year. exactly what powers have been transferred from the ministry of jihad to your position? see, these are

the powers that are the regulatory debates, anyway it was said that the regulation of the market, the marketing of the market, and the monitoring of the market of these two were there before, is it now or not? you see, this kind of thing is going to happen, of course , some parts have been handed over, but in any case , inspection supervision needs its own tools. in the previous two sections, you say how much of it is now available to you and is being completed, but exactly the main event that we are talking about has not happened yet, clearly what will happen if let's take a closer look. basically, we don't know about the market, only monitoring and inspection . i said that part of marketing and market regulation. regulation of prices in the market is a matter of supply and demand of goods. see, all this means that you

are the price setter of the goods, the supplier and the regulator of the prices. what is done now, for example , by the market regulation, or by the ministry of jihad and agriculture. basically, we are with the supervision of the government and sovereignty, which no one has any objection to, we say that the parts that we are going to supervise are the events that happened before it is going to come down to the issue of regulating the market, that is, determining the prices, the real supply and demand that wants to happen in the market. i would like to inform you that the supervision that you did not agree with is also in the field of market regulation and marketing and pricing, which means what was said last year, the memorandum of association that the chamber of guilds had with the javadi ministry of agriculture

was supposed to regulate the market and the market. delivery is also in the hands of snafu rooms, you are fine with this what is the issue of opponents or supporters? no, mr. nassab , you are right. mr. rastgari, our friend, says that we should not have a conflict between the supervision of the government and the supervision of the guilds. i do not believe in a conflict, that is . we consider the supervision of the government to be necessary , the supervision of the guilds and the presence of the guilds in the market , in fact we consider it legitimate to regulate the market and help the government, and it is true that this work helps the government because the knowledge of the guilds is good for their own market. it's not like the government has no knowledge, in any case , there is a very strong expert body within the government body and knowledge there is also a very good knowledge of different guilds. there are also very good databases , it's not that the government ca

n't have nobles anyway, but their presence in monitoring is necessary as an aid to the government, but to leave all the powers to the snaf, this is what i said about the issue of conflict of interest. it is true that according to our friend's interpretation , the conflict is actually a non-profit organization on paper, but if you are in a guild, the person who is actually the head of that guild came from within that guild. if people complain to mr. d's guild , the authority to regulate the market

will be entrusted to asalaf chambers. let's go to the monitoring to talk more about it. look at the pricing issue, i mentioned it once again in your program , pricing is not actually in the hands of market agents anywhere in the world , of course guilds have a very special role in pricing, mainly in developed countries, guilds in the pricing mechanism. they also have a bold role this should happen here too , there is no problem, but the price formula must be clear , what does it mean, if there is a shock to the market , a shock has entered the currency market, for whatever reason, we have experienced several shocks in recent years, another currency market shock. it means that the price of the currency will suddenly jump anyway, this may happen in the next few years, it may not happen, that this shock will be an excuse that all the pillars of the market , i.e. the interests of the people

, will be subordinated to the interests of the guild. the formula should be sacrificed for the benefit of the class. share of the shock of rising costs it should be completely transparent on the expenses of the association, with supervision, with the participation of the government, with the expertise of the government , with a verification mechanism, otherwise, the story of the motorcycle that i told you in a meeting a few meetings ago, there is no rationality behind this pricing system that you are using today. in the field of motorcycles, you see, there is no motorcycle that actually sold for the same price in 1995. in fact , there was no monitoring. now the price of that motorcycle has increased by almost 20 times or 30 times. if it seems to me that this in the field of pricing, the guilds themselves should monitor the transparent formula and cooperate with the government. if this transparency occurs in the pricing formula, in my opinion

, the benefit of the guilds will be realized as well as the benefit of the people. thank you , sir. rastgar was supposed to transfer the marketing of chicken, sugar and rice to snaf on a trial basis . how did this happen and how much do you agree with mr. hassan khani's orders in the area that you should not be the price setter? see the most important factor that we should consider. supply and demand means that which determines the price in our market, the subject of supply and demand guilds it comes and the unions come, we should not look at it as if it is a group that is just for the benefit of collecting, anyway , we have nearly 3 million trade unions in the country and having a significant contribution to economic growth is not just profiteering. in any case, they are a class like

other classes of society, they have the right to profit. see what i am saying, the predecessors of non-profits are unions and chambers. guilds means that it makes our supervision more accurate. we did not come here to take advantage of the market. it is true that we came up with the votes of the people. organizations should not see that they are special representatives for a certain group who come to benefit . when we have so many services in the country, we have so many possibilities , we have so many options, why did they limit our options when it comes to market regulation? why do we not want this

satisfaction and real demand to be implemented? what are we worried about ? in these 40 years that the government has been monitoring various things. he has been successful in economic issues. how many percent were they able to control the price and inflation ? what happened? why have we reached today ? almost since the 80s, the decree and so-called slogan of the year when the supreme leader of the revolution had economic slogans, that is, his last slogan was to say the people. becoming a production leap economy. popularization, yes, with the participation of the people, the participation of the people, apart from the fact that the people's institutional organizations are similar, which have both tools and expertise . they are both valid and they are not governmental . our speech is not governmental speech .

look at article 44 of the constitution . how far are we from that principle? trusting the people means that an organization that is made up of the people, such as trade unions and trade unions, should be given a price and be able to adjust the price. what kind of supply and demand mechanism should they make? we want transparency. the entry and presence of government agencies, under any title , will disrupt the market. to create a renti for a group well, this rent makes us never be successful in our market. let's control the end of the work

. we want to experience this again in a vicious circle, so our suggestion is that when there is enough supply and demand and it is in its own conditions, no one will be able to have a special rent, so the people will definitely benefit from it. people understand the real price and the real transparency . thank you, mr. hassan khani. well, dear brother, look, we are not against, nobody is in favor of governmentizing the economy . the general sentences are the same. it doesn't matter that we don't know from the leadership's statements from the slogan of the year, from the fact that the gentleman says that the popularization of the economy is equal to the trade unionization

of the economy, which we should not see. the point is that you say that sir let's leave it to snaf. if this is your interpretation, it means that we should leave the pricing to snaf. my suggestion is that there is no problem. let us leave the pricing to snaf. snuff, but the formula of this pricing should be clear , we can't say mr. snuff, you can make a box, a magic box , any price will come out of that magic box. demand can set the price fairly in conditions of stability. in conditions of competition, in conditions of perfect competition, it can make pricing fair . but what if there was a monopoly? in conditions of monopoly, on the supply side, can pricing be based on the pricing resulting from the supply? and demand can match. maximize the interests of the people the interests of the people are good, why should we project, why should we talk in general terms, what we are saying is, interfere with the trade unions , in fact interfere, give value to the government, it should

pay attention to the work and give value to the trade unions, but if the trade unions take over the work , they will take over all the components of the work, no corruption it doesn't happen, no, it's not like this. we have a lot of corruptions from the guilds , and this corruption can be the government's control along with the guilds' control. they should be complementary to each other. they should cooperate. the tone you say that the government is absolute evil and wherever it enters, it creates havoc . this is not true, because everywhere the guilds it is also not right for them to enter alone . it seems to me that in the field of pricing and marketing, if they have the main management guilds, along with the government's supervisory status, this can be complementary and actually realize the benefit of the people , but anyway, talking like this and seeing the government as a disturbing element will not make your statement come true, nor will it actually

lead anywhere. i want to give an example, see last year, i think early it was the month of december when the gold guild came, in fact , to make some assignments, to do some work where the guild is. the government has no choice but to control, it has no choice but to deal with it. we have to define it somehow, of course, this forgiveness goes back to the government itself. we have to design the path in such a way , especially in the field of basic items and agricultural items that mr. bozorrab says. and the issue of the program is that we have to design the game in such a way that the government can design the game in such a way that the guild can legitimately benefit its own beneficiaries . to forgive and help to achieve and at the same time, it is about the social benefit and the benefit of the people, which should not be taken into account, in fact it should be ignored, and they say that supply and

demand does not achieve welfare and social benefit. at the beginning of my divorce, i said that the government as the supervisor based on the law over all social affairs including the economy is that people's work should be entrusted to the people, and the slogan of the year is what is the interpretation of popularization, why do we interpret that popularization means leaving the work of the economy to the people , this does not negate the government's supervision of the economy. unfortunately, this is what you are saying.

according to the test that was given in different periods in the country in different situations to show that the union and asalaf have this closeness, what narrow-mindedness is there that they don't want these people's organizations to form , they don't want to be able to do what they are promised. doing the conversations that sometimes can be called negativity is the behavior that should be snafu anyway. in your union, you used gold as an example , the gold and gold sales union of the country , not having any opposition to the law where the law has created restrictions , you may not know most of this. system and port those who put all these things disrupt the business, that means

you want a normal business. do it , you have to go through 10 systems, how much does a trade union have to spend to bring an expert and an employee to come, see these obstacles, these are the same obstacles that are sometimes created by some people who have a narrow view of people's organizations. we have no objection to supervision, by the way, supervision and transparency is something we believe in . what we say is that people's work should be entrusted to people, when we have a union with several hundreds of thousands of experts who are different. the nobles have experts, they have something to say, why did we remove them from us? today, i claim that trade unions and trade unions are experts in all trade and economic issues. you are the experts who

bring different situations. one-tenth of them don't have this, but they claim that we should put aside this claim , let's use the people . we are able to do better than what is in all economic matters. let me ask a question let me see that you are saying that the systems are disrupting business. this is a false statement. the infrastructure system is in the form of countries, which i can give you as an example of about 100 countries. when a person goes to buy gold, it will definitely be authenticated. can you

see what kind of disruption this authentication of people causes so that the guild itself is not harmed? now a terrorist incident happened in shahcheragh shiraz in kerman during the ceremony of martyr soleimani, if before this incident a goldsmith was completely healthy and it is a sin because he is the financier of this the terrorist came and bought some gold pieces from him and supported the terrorist and provided financial support. if this guy gets caught, you will see the answer . who is cooperating with terrorism? when they say authentication, what does this disturb you? what position does this lack of transparency create for you? i can name it. the right to regulate the market. now you have a specific trade. for example, we are talking about regulating the market, mainly about chicken, meat, rice, sugar, etc. we are talking about basic goods.