quds road to international quds day yesterday, an incident happened in syria that affected the whole world, especially our dear country, and that was the rocket launchers. the consulship of the islamic republic of iran in the city of damascus, syria, which led to the martyrdom of a number of dear commanders and generals of the resistance front. the liberation of quds, but we said that we should talk about the martyrs.

let's do away with a regime whose foundation and its government is based on terror, with the help of the zionist regime, wherever there is a momentary sense of danger. if he does , he will immediately remove that person from that position by assassinating him, whether he is a nuclear or space scientist, a political figure, a political or military official, or a media figure, wherever he feels threatened , he commits assassinations. physically, that person beats and announces with pride, because the basis of this regime is terror and now there are more than 3 thousand terrors in the world, which was written in a book called rise up and strike first by ronenbergman, who is also a zionist. the document has confessed to these assassinations and he has no qualms about this book . let's see and hear later in the service

we will be you. his liver was no longer working. the cancerous tumor had taken root. in the body of meir dagan , the former head of mossad bin rishai , a zionist military reporter who has been covering war news for 50 years , says that tabhar dagan was beheading palestinians. dagan. running outside the borders of palestine. collecting

information from all over the world and then designing and implementing operations against anyone who opposes the occupation by exploding cell phones and drones . in 600 pages of the book he published the book rise and first.

that the german rocket scientist heinz kruk was kidnapped from his office in munich, the assassination of hamas leaders, the assassination of lebanon's emad moghniyeh, and nuclear scientists as well. despite all of this, there have been some cases of disappointment , such as the unsuccessful assassination of khaled attari, the head of the political bureau of the hamas movement in 1997 . he tried harder to get them back. if these actions are done in other countries, people will be ashamed and embarrassed. but the israelis are proud of these assassinations. many of those interviewed by bergman are now dead, like dagan. but the killing

bequeathed to their children. saeeda zanganeh of sed and sima news agency. well, we saw that it is a fully documented book. based on the interview of the historical documents that come up , it states the examples of about a thousand people who were assassinated by the zionist regime . you have also seen the author of the book who says that israel does this with pride, but why does it carry out these assassinations and eliminations? as we mentioned that this regime is based on terror and its foundation is based on terror, but we have to see that the actions that countries are taking now to deal with these terrors are deterrent. we are at the service of mr. dr. rostampour , a political researcher, as well as mr. mehdi tabar, an international relations expert

. you are very welcome, mr. dr. mr. mehdi. these assassinations mentioned in this book are also mentioned and about 2,700,3,000 assassinations that have been carried out in all these years, from the martyr seyed abbas mousavi to the subsequent assassinations such as the martyr moghniyeh and the assassinations of the iranian authorities from the martyr soleimani and the martyrs of the same attack yesterday. such actions as iran what has been done all these years to confront the zionist regime, has it been a deterrent or not? if so, why did the number of assassinations increase in these years? خدمت همه بینندگان عزیز و همچنین عرض تبریک و تسلیت دارم به خاطر اتفاق دیروز شهادت پرافتخار سرداران و پاسداران و سربازان جانبر کف جمهوری اسلامی ایران انشاالله که خداوند به حق این ماه بر درجاتشون

بیافزاید و ما رو هم به اون سرمنزلی که این عزیزان براش دارن می the fighters are fighting , god willing, they will reach the door. the question you asked among the political documents and political researches that have happened, we have two types of deterrence, one type of deterrence, which is known as classic deterrence , this is the deterrence that has received a lot of attention in the last 24 hours in iran's social networks, that is , retaliation at the same level if the same topic is discussed. it is the same area that they point out that if iran comes to the embassy, ​​for example, it should be in charge of psychological affairs. it can be said that class diplomacy is actually classical deterrence

. classical deterrence says to act point by point and step by step. sardar beat you in your position hit the equivalent system if you are an axis. search for your destruction, find the similar axis and attack it. this type of deterrence has been removed from the table of military policy makers for almost 20 years, because classical deterrence cannot carry the basic element of deterrence. the meaning of this basic element of deterrence is unpredictability. this attack that you are doing, be ready immediately , will happen to all the headquarters, all the commanders, yes, all the commanders and all the forces, well, if you act in retaliation for that unpredictability, it will be questioned. therefore, a new concept has emerged called

modern deterrence. in modern deterrence , it is not necessary to immediately retaliate, it is not necessary to retaliate at the same level, it is not necessary. retaliation in this view, in fact, unlike the classical deterrence of a conical pyramid, looks at the pyramid of your interests in front of the harem of rival interests. he draws and tells you that if you hit him, if you are actually playing pranks , you should retaliate accordingly . new deterrence is coming. in fact , he draws a spider web of interests. in this spider web of interests, he says what was the purpose of deterrence. from deterrence it was that the forces and faces were hit, in fact or not, you should prevent your competitor from achieving his goals

, if you are looking to prevent your competitor from achieving his goals, you should go for modern deterrence , there is an article in the center. belfer, an english think tank , was later republished in foreign policy from the testimony of shahid fakhrizadeh, the author of that article talked about this. asked if with the assassination of shahid fakhrizadeh, the nuclear knowledge production organization and the application of this knowledge in the sectors identified by iranian policymakers will be destroyed or not. no, the author came there, made a distinction , and said that from the point of view of the israelis, because the israelis are looking at it , it makes classical deterrence more valid. they know that by slapping the face of that organization , it will fall apart, while the americans do not look at it this way

, and in another article that was published after the martyrdom of general haj qassem soleimani, it was mentioned in the same foreign policy that israel at high cost, it is able to hit iran's direct targets, and against iran , it has the ability to replace the interests of the faces of the organization of combat education, which is now using an interpretation. i saw that interpretation in those documents after sardar's assassination, and in the documents that i want to mention called back flash, it says that iran has a high back flash capability , a classic deterrence especially when the border is peaceful. peace and war are characteristic and the modern deterrence of the time

of hybrid war is showing itself. hybrid war , unfortunately, with hybrid war, a mistake has actually happened in the sense that i think we should pay attention to this. if we don't pay attention to this , we are constantly waiting for a retaliation. we raise the expectations of our public opinion, while we now in the middle of the battlefield. let's ask the meaning of hybrid war from mr. mahdi tabar. can you explain, mr. mehdi tabar, what is the meaning of hybrid war that we have entered into, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful? hello , dear viewers , i offer my condolences for yesterday's tragic incident. god willing, we have a new discussion in the science of international relations as the complexity of the international system. in fact, after the collapse of the soviet union, what happened in the international system was that the international system

moved towards non-linearity, a new series of events. it appeared in the international system, which we had not seen before, one of these things, just as the doctor said, hybrid wars , hybrid wars have a series of fundamental differences from classic wars, which, of course, as the doctor said, also with hybrid wars. by mistake. it is considered a hybrid war, a war in which the elements of war and peace are strongly integrated, that is, when you ask an ordinary person whether iran is at war or at peace, he says, well, there is no full-scale war, so we are at peace, but in the same way. as you can see , assassinations happen, diplomatic wars and so on at your service, there is an economic embargo , there is an economic war, there is terror , there are limited wars, there are proxy wars. all these exist, but when we ask the common man

, he cannot consider this as a war. in fact, a cognitive error occurs . this is an important feature that happens in hybrid war that we have not seen before. well, this issue of hybrid war is contrary to classical war, when it has different characteristics, naturally requires different deterrence, a deterrence in line with hybrid war, we need that we don't need before. we had that is, when you study in the history of international relations , deterrence measures were similar measures , that is, in recent centuries, supposedly, if england took an action against russia. russia is taking the same action as the discussion of countermeasures, which is always discussed in the international context, this is good for the classical world, a world in which the international system is not yet complex, and wars are classical wars, full-scale wars, but now just as the doctor said, we don't need one-on-one counseling anymore, that is, if this is a mistake, which is a few hours from this, anyway.

we see the past incident, for example, it is said that iran should also respond to the embassy. to threaten the homes of the zionist regime, this is a very big mistake, we don't need one-by-one and similar actions anymore, we are faced with a multitude of answers that we can choose from and we have the right to choose widely, we should do this too. he noted that israel's action, the action of the zionist regime , is a reaction to the increase in the strength of the resistance network in the region. ah, this is a very important point, because some people think that he has taken an initial step, now we have to react. we have done it, but you say that this was a reaction to what was the reaction to, well , actually, with the occurrence of the islamic revolution, a fundamental change took place in the international system, outside of the two dimensions of east and west, a new thing, a new word, a new claim. it was brought up from there. yes, a new phenomenon actually happened. it started from there

. now it is like that the resistance network has become so powerful that it can effectively destroy a regime that was once called the fourth military power in the world for months in a row. well, in this hybrid war, deterrence is needed we have different factors to consider and we have different answers. our answer can be military, it can be civilian, it can be direct, it can be indirect, it can be a proxy, it can be a network, that is, we are not limited to if israel takes an action, we must take the same action in order to achieve deterrence. this is a mistake that is said, unfortunately, and is repeated a lot in cyberspace, but we are faced with a multitude of answers that , in fact, now the authorities think the right decision they will make a decision that will ultimately lead to the deterrence of iran. we all agree

on this. well, there is an important issue that exists. you told me at the end of your speech, mr. doctor. you know it is advisable to answer that immediately after any incident like this. which is similar to what is happening in our country now, whether inside the country or abroad, an official of ours, whether it is military or political , an assassination happens to him, this atmosphere of self-deprecation quickly occurs and emotional reactions are waiting for an action to take place immediately because now let their hearts find peace yes, but mr. mehdi is of descent, we also say yes.

let's educate in yes, it is not like that if something happened, we say that no, there is no problem and there is nothing wrong with it. the analysis is for them to suffer one blow and one injury, on the other hand, when i come , i will talk about the new deterrence, and i will talk about the fact that in the last 10 years , iran is clearly the first threat not only to the interests of israel, but also to the interests of the united states is also in the region it has been and recently there is a report in the world that i saw recently in one of the congressional hearings where he was talking about the investment of the united states in africa, and there he discussed that

iran has become the master of proxies, what does it mean. that is, the master of creating proxy groups, and he can also create a proxy group in africa in a sense in order to endanger the vital interests of the united states . so when i come , i will talk about the new deterrence based the documents belong to the americans, not like it is now it happened, i want to justify it, i want to say no , it didn't happen, there must have been damage to the sardar's assassination, but when you look, you see that just last march, i had a meeting at the beginning of the year, at the beginning of every year . the security and political authorities of the united states establish and assess the threats to themselves in the new year

. they use an interpretation that says iran has the ability to back flash . what does back flash mean ? he lists some cases about those strikes, for example , i will quote one of them, saying that iran was able to open and warm support. what does "warm" mean in the sense of all-round support for palestine , to discourage even other persian gulf countries from having relations with the zionist regime? this backlash that he is talking about is based on the same new deterrence, which means that iran has such high flexibility that it will bear the blow, but it will replace it. the organization that has been hit is thinking twice, as it made this statement after the martyrdom of fakhrizadeh and after the martyrdom of haj qasim, and this

is not a conversation that we can imagine as a psychological operation by the americans. or is it the israelis, these are in the political documents in the congress, so iran has a capability called the ability to lock, what does this ability to lock mean, high flexibility. that after receiving blows , he will come back to repair the organization and even flash forward to attack, but mrs. hosseini says one thing, she says that the only hope of the americans to deal with iran's capability in the document of annual threats to the united states is to invest in problems. iran's internal affairs and the creation of security grievances to produce american points in the front organization in front of the front line means the same thing that happened in 24 hours have passed, it means that iran's combat organization

has the ability to compensate after these terrible events , it has the ability to restore, well, the fighters will be martyred, and those who will replace them, these people and figures can, by chance, achieve goals further than what was depicted and drawn. but what is the problem? the problem is that we have weaknesses in the field of cyberspace, in the field of mental operations, and in the field of psychological operations. as soon as anything happens against the interests of the islamic republic of iran, what happened yesterday is a loss for us. god willing, it will be repaired yes, you see the same thing in the story of the clever retaliation of the kermanem terrorist operation. we retaliated, we came with our hands up, what did we do , we came and showed a thumbs up , we showed both aamir and the agent in their place, but this virtual space, which

is turbulent, is chaotic, is scattered, the influence of emotions is influenced by emotions, there too, this operation could not achieve this total. considering tracking interests as a privilege, yes, unfortunately, mr. mehdi, you are related to the issue of hybrid war, which i would like to point out, one of the most important tools is the media tool. we have about one or two minutes. if you tell me how to do this, we are now in the real arena. we are winning the arena in the arena. we are winning in the real war . let the media also win and tell the people that we are ahead of the pack, we have the upper hand. see , i think we all should pay attention to one point. well, just as the doctor said, "the damage is great, a great thing has happened, but the field of foreign policy is not the field of venting emotions, it is the field of being cool." it is not the field of survival,

one mistake can be the last mistake, that is one the damage can be so great that the country will be in a crisis for years, so we must be careful that we are facing a critical situation that should be avoided from non-specific words. in the community that i was reviewing , i sometimes encountered the phenomenon that some people portray the scene of statehood and reacting to this big event as a computer game, and of course it should be noted that this issue itself this cognitive error and cognitive war is a part of the hybrid war that we are facing, which means that you see we are facing such scenes on social networks and this space. yes, this is a part of the war. well, in this case, you must pay attention to the fact that you must avoid non-specific discussions. i always

liken the foreign policy environment to neurosurgery, so much so that it is a vital issue, just like for a a person's brain and nerves are vital. foreign policy is so vital for a country because it endangers the survival of a country. therefore, in my opinion, the point that we should all pay attention to is to stay away from non-specialist discussions, and with this, we can avoid this cognitive error. let's keep it, god willing, thank you very much, mr. dr. rastanpour, and you too thank you, mr. mehdi tabar, and thank you very much, dear viewers , thank you very much for accompanying us, god willing, it will be ready tomorrow. we will be at your service for 16 and 30 minutes from the khabar network. good day, god bless you.

it's tsunami, a tsunami has happened here, a tsunami worse than the indonesian tsunami, god is enough for us, he is the best helper, i say to netanyahu and the arab nation, we will make this place prosperous , our women and girls will bear children, thousands of people will replace one person, our women will bear children we will build and settle here again , we will free our land, they can do whatever they want.

in the evening, dear compatriots, we have arrived at 17:00 and we present the news of this hour. 3 days before the world quds day, compatriots are preparing to participate in the march of this day and condemn the crimes of the zionist regime. the world quds day march will start on friday, april 17, at 10:00 across the country. this ceremony will be held in tehran from imam hossein square towards tehran university. we are witnessing the bad things that israel is doing in gaza, whether it is a human disaster, whether it is a conflict, whether it is a matter of coercion or coercion.