in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. hello, good morning . welcome to the news of the capital market. the vice president of the market development of the iran commodity exchange announced the start of the first non-banking gold treasury in the capital market. with the start of this treasury, the amount of gold stock in the treasury of the iran commodity exchange exceeded 6 tons. creating this market requires coordination.

it was all-round and should be coordinated with zinfan . its systems were designed by experts, processes were written, connections to brokerages were made, derivative instruments were defined on it, and commodity funds were coordinated with them. to be able to buy these tools, all this is the result of my colleagues in the commodity exchange, who were able to create an official and efficient transparent gold market for the iranian market, for the economic activists in this country. they should sell their own products in an official market and make the mining activities they are doing profitable. the glass hall witnessed the rise of 20,000 units of the total index. on this day, the net

change of legal and real ownership of the market became positive after 5 days and more than 44 billion tomans of real money entered from the stock market. the stock market ended monday's trading with the saudi movement of total and equal weight indicators. on this day, the total index of the tehran stock exchange rose 1,926 units higher than the previous working day and reached the level of 2,200,000 units, again rejecting the half-channel of 2,200,000 units, with a yield of 89 hundred percent. on this day, the trading price of small and medium stocks in the market also increased and the equal weight index reached the level of 74,951 units with a positive return of one hundred percent equal to 8403 units. net change of legal ownership to real market after 5. in 5 days, more than 44 billion tomans of money became positive

haghigi entered the stock market. in addition, more than 250 billion tomans of real money was also entered into fixed income funds. on this day, the stock market witnessed the exchange of more than 10.85 billion stocks and bonds in 350,000 transactions with a value of 660 billion tomans. fars family symbols shepna and beh mellat had the most positive impact on the stock market index and on the contrary. the symbols of qoran khlant to kerman dabid prevented further growth of the total index. during monday's transactions, the most deposits of real money were allocated to computer groups, stock funds and leasing, and the most outflows of money haghigi from banking, mining and insurance groups. the condition of the symbols of the glass hall also indicated that 593 symbols were positive and 187 symbols were negative, while the glass hall saw 76 of the market symbols being positive. be also, 84 icons

were faced with the buy screen and 42 icons with the sell queue. the total value of purchase pages was 237 billion tomans, the total value of sales pages was 19 billion tomans. ghazal arabkal of radio and television news agency. more than 640,000 tons of all kinds of products were offered in the commodity exchange on monday. in talarers and industrial and mineral products from 270,000 tons of goods, including bloom ingots and steel sheet was done. about 30,000 tons of polymer and chemical materials were offered in the petrochemical and petroleum products hall. the cement hall hosted the supply of 194 thousand tons of cement. in the open auction hall, 94 thousand tons of all kinds of products were sold. the supply of 4957 non-ferrous and granulated sulfur in the export hall has also been closed. the secondary market also witnessed the supply of 4900.

bhutan's investment in cryptocurrency mining of this country aims to compensate for the decrease in income from the tourism industry by mining more bitcoins . bhutan, a country in the heart of the himalayas, is trying to increase its mining activity it is bitcoin. bhutan's economy, which is heavily dependent on income from tourism , was affected after the outbreak of the corona virus, and foreign exchange reserves increased to reduce unemployment. now this country is approaching. bitcoin halving is hoping to make up for its declining revenues. halving is a pre-programmed event in the bitcoin contract that happens approximately every four years after every 210,000 blocks have been mined. in the bitcoin halving event, the reward that miners receive for mining each block

is halved. this country plans to increase the ability pay attention to your mining volume to deal with this reduction. bhutan's effort to extract latitude. the bhutanese authorities have decided to supply the electricity needed for the extraction devices from hydropower sources. bhutan produces cheap energy from which to mine bitcoins. it can be used slowly, but the water resources of this country are dry for 3 months of the year. an issue that has caused experts to warn about the environmental concerns of this action. on the other hand , due to the extreme fluctuations in the price of cryptocurrencies, if the price of

bitcoin does not increase significantly after the halving of the rewards, it may return. bhutan's capital has a negative impact. saeed. according to mr. nasserpour , last year, about 18 licenses were issued for the approval of new operating companies, of which 11 companies were established and 10 companies were able to obtain operating licenses based on the latest statistics of the organization. at the moment, brokerage companies have paid about 42 thousand billion tomans of credit to their customers and received nearly 47 thousand billion tomans of facilities from the banking system. the general secretary of stock exchange workers continued to reduce the 30

% share of brokerage companies from the market development fund informed. mr. sabet said that one of the positive actions of this center last year was the reduction of the share of brokerages. it was in the market development fund. according to mr. thabit , with the support of the stock exchange organization and the board of directors, this share went from 35% to 30%, and the hope is that this reduction will continue this year. mr. thabit also said that the presence of a representative of the association in the violations board, obtaining a license to publish books and launching the brokers' magazine was one of the important activities of the association of stock market operators last year. and that the global price of gold has increased in recent days , experts increase the demand for buying gold from the central banks and the assessment of the consequences of the us jobs report on the interest rate reduction

were considered to be the main reasons for the increase in the price of gold in recent days. the price of gold in the last week with an increase of about four percent in limited. it experienced an increase of about 7% in the last month. last week, gold continued its upward trend despite the strong non-agricultural wage report for march in the united states of america, which could prevent the federal reserve from cutting interest rates earlier than market active expectations. experts believe that the release of relevant reports to increase the purchase of gold by. banks center and the assessment of the consequences of the american jobs report on the potential reduction of interest rates this year, one of the main reasons for the increase in the price of gold. we have reached the end of the news.

greetings, politeness and respect, to all the viewers of the higher program , we are at your service with another debate on the issue of whether or not to form the ministry of commerce, an issue that was even discussed very seriously last year and in the previous years in the previous government. whether this ministry of home affairs

should be formed or not, the afghans and the opposition have a lot of disagreements. also , they consider it necessary to have a regulatory body for the market due to the problems that existed in the field of market regulation and supply of goods, and the formation of this ministry of home affairs should have a debate with the same issue that i presented to you. i invite two of the economic experts to accompany us until the end. iranian coach sharaf iran has a telegram playing all over the country. we don't agree . above all,

mr. hashem soudager, economic researcher and opponent you are with the higher program. here in our studio , the formation of the ministry of commerce is also present, as well as mr. hassan khani, another economic expert of the program, who agrees with the formation of this ministry. the house that i offered to you, while saying hello to both guests of the program , i would like to start with mr. soudagar and ask the reason for their opposition to the formation of the ministry of commerce . there are two fundamental issues regarding the mission of the agricultural sector. usually, it was seen that the person responsible for the production of raw agricultural products is then actually delivered to the rest of the economic sectors, but it has been for several decades. in the world and in the political space. our position is that our agricultural sector is responsible for food supply

, both the issue of raw material production and the issue of processing and marketing, if there is an issue of import and if there is an issue of export, which is the regulator of the production market, all these should be in one set and from a common point of view, this view also takes place at the farm level, which means that in the same way, farmers in the past only considered themselves responsible for producing, for example, a raw product, such as tomatoes. but now it is said that the same farmer should go to the farm either in his own production unit or in his own organization in order to process this product and then sell it, if he wants to sell raw materials , he will put the most effort in the economy and get the least profit, and in fact, the profit will reach the rest of the chain . that we consider a ministry of home affairs to be only in charge of policy making for the production of raw agricultural products, and we want the rest of the chain before production, for example, supply of inputs, supply of animal feed

, supply of crops, supply of fertilizers and fertilizers, especially those related to imports in our country. we know that a large part of all these institutions is import in the same way, after the production process, which is the discussion of processing and marketing and the various stages that exist in this chain, if policymaking is divided into two parts and placed in different home ministries, it is thought that these policies can be in line with each other and ultimately from production. national support is very difficult. we are looking to improve the production of honey in the field of food and agriculture. we know that in the events that have happened at the international level in the past years, from the discussion of corona and the war in ukraine to the unrest that exists all over the world, the discussion of self-sufficiency in food for all parts of the world has become prominent. even the countries that say that we are going towards the world markets based on and we can clearly see this policy in europe

, moving towards having their own food chain, so in addition to supplying our own food, this is a value of providing food, two at a reasonable price, and three as far as domestic production is possible, that is, in the chain. we should not be dependent. of course, these one, two, and 34 that i am saying are not necessarily relative to each other. in terms of priorities, all these values ​​should be together, and those four are also about climate and water limitations. we must have all these together, we must have food , we must consider the limitations of our water in different regions of the country in food production , and the right price. it should be for the consumer, and the income of the producer, who is a farmer, should be sufficient for him to make a living , manage his life, and be motivated to stay in this job . there is a uniform policy in the supply chain, and there is a concern that if the groups

in charge of policy making in this area are divided into two parts, this if a problem arises and we cannot put all these goals together and achieve all these goals , unfortunately in the past years, now if we look a little higher, it is basically a matter of separating the agricultural commercial sector from the agricultural production sector. in fact, it has a history, that is , if we want to observe the structural changes that have existed in the ministry of agriculture or the jihad of agriculture in all these years, in 1379, we had the integration of construction and agriculture, in 1990 , we had the creation of the ministry of agriculture, in 1992, we had the separation law. we had that in fact according to this law in fact excuse me, the law of concentration, yes, the law is now known as the law of order. what do they say in the law of concentration ? they say that all the duties related to different sectors of agriculture should be centralized, just like

the other changes that have taken place in the last decade. thank you to all the viewers of the network who have been with us until this moment. if you are interested in this discussion until the end, follow us on khabar . well, you are with the program at a higher level, mr. sodagar . your time is almost running out. if you summarize in 30 seconds, let's go to structural changes in the ministry of agricultural jihad in 2019 we had the concentration law in 1998 , we suspended that concentration law in 1400, we applied it again in 401, and in 402 we discussed this.

he is in the ministry and it is difficult for the ministry to organize itself so easily . that there have been a lot of management changes in the last 10 years in this ministry, we had 6 ministers and in fact supervisors, and this is too much , thank you mr. hassan khani, why do you agree with that this ministry of home affairs should be formed. how much do you agree with mr. soudagar's words? before we start the discussion, i emphasize again that the debate may not have much of a topic, but it is a debate, but we will try to comply with your request to debate, but before to have a debate , i will read a few posts with each other. if we have a discussion, first of all, the separation and claim of the ministries in the government will not significantly reduce or increase the size of the government. if you have a discussion, discuss it with each other. it means that one government in one country may have 50 home ministries

if he has, he can do 30 to 40 of these 50 depending on the expediency. as a matter of principle , the size of the government in terms of cost, in terms of manpower , in terms of buildings and physical facilities should not have any particular change. the experience of recent years, at least from the years, in fact, since the 90s, when the ministry of industry , commerce and industry was separated and the ministry of position was formed. it does not show that the ministry of home affairs was separated from the time of mr. ahmadinejad 234 to the ministry of home affairs. i don't think that the size of the government has decreased in those years until now i can find a fact for this issue or actually evidence for this issue. i didn't. this is a proposition. the second proposition is that commerce is a specialized subject, which means exactly like agriculture, which

you say is a specialized subject, and the one who specializes in the field works in industries. he cannot understand the relations of the agricultural sector well and make policies for it, and we must leave it to the discussion of agricultural jihad. i think that commerce is also a completely specialized field. in recent years, if you want , we can give an exact example of their inefficiency. one example is the summer of 1400 events. and look at the inconsistencies that occurred between the ministry of agricultural jihad and specifically between the state trading company and the program organization. it is a completely specialized issue, and my opinion is that entrusting commerce to a domestic ministry like the ministry of industry , like the ministry of agricultural jihad, this will damage

commerce , especially in the context of sanctions. it should be separated from the ministry of agriculture. you are a minister according to the former minister of this ministry, 25 % of the country's gdp is directly related to this ministry, that is, you should put 18 home ministries on one side, 75% of your home ministry should be put on one side with 25% related to related matters. basically, the ministry of home affairs is an unmanageable position with this size, with this amount of space that it has and the responsibility placed on it, with this style and style, in my opinion, it is unmanageable, mr. sodagari . being the ministry,

now answer these questions so that we can get to those points what you said, let me ask mr. hassan khani in the field of agriculture. i will tell you about the specialization of the commercial discussion. it is absolutely correct, but the question is, when we want to design the structure of the ministry of housing, with what logic do we design the structure? the discussion of specialization, the discussion of the size of a ministry, the discussion of the effect of abstraction or separation and integration in the actual size or smallness of the ministry of home affairs , well, the specialized discussions of public administration, which are actually discussed in public administration, public administration , but the issue is what is the basis. for example, if there is a basis for the specialization of that job, then you and the ministry we also have different departments that are really specialized, for example, the specialization required for the field of agriculture is very different from the specialization required for the dairy field, and each is really specialized, but it does not necessarily mean that , for example, the deputy of agriculture should be for it

should become a ministry, and the deputy of the livestock department should become another home ministry. of course , i don't really have expertise in the field of my position, and maybe this discussion can be raised, but based on the logic that i presented to you , we are a group of goods that are the same family . we consider the whole chain of that policy let's go to a ministry, i mean agriculture , including agriculture, horticulture, livestock and poultry, and the rest of the fields that we know belong to this field , including the field of natural resources . but their production method is close to all of them, so these can be considered as one group , if the chain of these is in the same ministry of home affairs, in the same direction, it is possible to establish this separation. we can go towards groups that are the same family, for example let's sit down and see

what is going on in the ministry of families, for example, maybe the area of ​​automobiles and its accessories is one area, and other areas are other areas, but if we separate each one , we will give the whole chain to its own hands, and this negates the specialization of the production sector. it is not the commercial sector, because i told you that when we want to produce goods that are affordable for the consumer and profitable for the producer, we also consider climate issues, water shortages, and issues like this. policy making should be very coherent. okay, now we are in the field of water agriculture jihad in the hands of the ministry of energy, we have a challenge in the area of ​​fragmentation of our water policy, and in fact, even with this area that i am presenting to you, it is possible to protest that basically water policy is the part that is related to agriculture. it should be waited for by the ministry of energy and the ministry of jihad and agriculture will come with that logic. in fact, the chain is in that product group, mr. doctor. i have 2 questions

. the first question, do you see? i have no problem with the chain. i don't have any problem. the first question is the chain. seeing government issues and tasks solves the problem , not at all, so this condition is not enough yes, no, it is not a sufficient condition. i am providing a sufficient condition . the second two questions. does not seeing the chain of the issue necessarily ruin the work of the government, in the sense that we are in the general employment policies approved in 2013, if i am not mistaken, i do not remember the year, i doubt that there is a weekly clause, the content of which is the coordination and stability of monetary policies, finance and currency and the business of this matter. the content of my article is seven general employment policies . my question is, look, now we are in the field of position and communication between the position and the central bank . the ministry has a position

. the central bank is doing it. with your argument , if i give the supply of width and the allocation of width to the ministry of silence, i will see a chain, then the problems will be solved, and if i don't, i did something wrong and the problem will arise . it is sufficient condition that you say no , now i say that if we do not see a chain, something special will definitely happen, with this reference that service. and the field of providing and allocating currency is separate from the field of order registration, so nothing special has happened in this field, maybe someone will ask and say no , if we do this, it will be better, it will be more efficient. i would like to say that the current situation does not allow me to take the supply of currency from the central bank from the shoulders of the central bank, mr. central bank, you should only work in the field of rial currency, i want to give the field of currency to the ministry of hearing because i want to see a chain. here are the questions that i asked

you, we can see in one place , how is the relationship between policy making and implementation? do the business as well , but the whole work is done by the state trading company, that's the problem it means that we don't get an answer. this is not because the work is in this ministry or in that ministry. there is no prospect that the ministry of jihad and agriculture wants to focus on the law based on the law . basically, the issue of trade leave it to the formation of our vision

. we can never assign all the activities in the chain related to a group of goods to one ministry by looking at the chain. it is not possible, but the issue is that how much we want to increase the number of these people, it is logical that if we want, for example , to give the issue of supply and allocation of agricultural land to the ministry of home affairs, we will give the matter of industry to the people's industry. regarding himself, well , we will really have a problem in the field of foreign exchange this time, but the issue is that if we separate this , then we will give the water to the ministry of energy, then we will give rome to the ministry of commerce, then how can we expect from the ministry of agricultural jihad? that provides food, we have all the tools needed in the chain for policy making we took it away from him and there is no mechanism for a split. of course, the function of the supreme councils in our government structure is that the ministries

of housing that have related work that are related to each other in the chain sit together with the presidency and in fact they create this disunity , but we have seen in practice that it is not possible to settle for them, that is, if we want to work in all these areas , it is not possible to form a supreme council for each of them, so i say that if possible, we should continue the chain. it should be in a home ministry , except for things that are separated for a special reason we separated the width for a specific reason , we also separated the water for a specific reason, which i say is the reason. it's not very special, we can go back to the commercial heart of rome and leave nothing in the hands of the minister of agriculture. yes, see, of course, my point is not that now we must consider the ministry of jihad from the powers of commerce. in fact, my position is to form the ministry of commerce this is not the case, because you have a lot of expertise and knowledge in the field of agricultural jihad, maybe it will

be perceived that way. the size of the ministry and the unmanageability of this home ministry, different companies , different vice-chancellors, different duties in this home ministry have made every minister, even the highest, the most powerful, in fact, the executive ministers of the government, as well as the executive people , be on top of this. the ministry of home affairs is so large that it is difficult to manage it . i told the previous minister that 25% of the country's gdp is directly. he is in contact with this ministry of home affairs and his affairs are being prepared or arranged by this ministry of home affairs. this is a worrisome issue , how can a ministry of this size be created he wants to be responsible for everything. i mainly emphasize on the formation of the ministry of commerce from this point of view , but at the same time, since the issue of agriculture is also discussed , there is this doubt for me that when in the law of concentration of duties, the cause of the year is the cause of asfand.