thank you, thank you for joining. in the name of allah, the merciful, the most merciful, ladies and gentlemen, hello , welcome to the world. today, i, hosni sadat shabiri , will accompany you in this program for about an hour. iran has announced that the punishment of the zionist regime for the attack on the consular section of the iranian embassy in damascus is certain. tonight, i ask what will be the effects of punishing the regime that brazenly attacked the embassy of a country in order to improve deterrence? before the dialogues

, let's see a selection of pictures of international support for palestine in shabaneh yesterday. don't give them any reason to be violent people being arrested, not okay, this is not okay.

right, one struggle, one fight, one, two, three, four, we don't want your bloody more, five, six, seven, eight, stop the killing, stop the height, biden, biden, you can't fight , you're committing in genocide, free, please, five, six, sev, eight, stop the killing, stop the... people all over the world

expressed their opinion in the virtual space, iran's response to the zionist terrorist attack on the consular section of the embassy in damascus, iran is called self-defense. iran will attack israel in the next two days. this is the headline of the report of the american wall street journal, which was published by the british middle east news agency. and these comments of the people below this report , excuse me, iran's attack is defending itself , there are 3,000 comments registered under this report, the owners of 70 % of these comments also believe that iran's response to the zionists is self-defense, iran has the right to defend itself, the attack is thought. i think they call this the right of self-defense or revenge. the incident goes back to the terrorist act of the zionists in april and the missile attack on the consular section of the iranian embassy in damascus.

an attack that this retired military zionist believes it is the beginning of drowning the zionists in the sea. it reminds me of going to a lake on a terribly hot day. you don't know how to swim, but you jump into it to cool down a bit. it's fun for the first few seconds, but then you sink. now the zionists started simulating an iranian attack. in the words of the military, the sky of the lands they have occupied. news and analysis about iran's response to the zionists' terrorist act

, iran's many and completely risky options for retaliating against israel , intensifying concerns about iran's retaliatory attack against israel and america, this newspaper the american also talks about the danger. israel's dangerous game with iran is a dangerous game that, according to the director of the foreign policy project of the brooks foundation, america has one side that has the upper hand in the region. the truth is that the islamic republic is now in a better position than at any other time in the middle east. from the media these days , the page of the authorities of different countries to contact iran is very popular . mr. ajarlo, an expert on west asian issues, as well as mr. sohail kesirinejad, an expert on the zionist regime, both are welcome. let's start the question with mr. ajarlou

, what effects do you think iran's response to the terrorist attack on the consular section of the iranian embassy in damascus will have on improving deterrence ? dear viewers and also dear guests, well, the fact is that it is basically a well-known issue that anyone who wants peace must be ready for war, and this is a basic principle in international relations, especially since this literature is widespread after world war ii. especially after the spread of nuclear weapons. and the discussion was that there should be one we should have a credible threat against someone who threatens you. well, this deterrence has almost the characteristics that the first principle is that a country must have the ability to do this

, it must have this level of military preparedness. this means that the credibility of his threat is valid, which means that if he says , give credit to that argument. stability in decision-making and stability in competition, and finally , the discussion that is very important here is the discussion of communication , that is, the discussion of diplomacy that is being established, countries communicate and say that the message is in the form of the statement should announce that i am targeting these goals . when we put these together, we are putting these features together. basically, the move of the zionist regime seems to have been made by a regime that is in a war zone. and his decisions are in a way a kind of test of other parties, that is, if the islamic republic of iran does not respond to this issue , the problem that will happen is that it will increase the threats, but if it responds and the response

is valid and the message reaches and stability in this process ok, we are witnessing that this is decreasing , these are the same events. the latter shows that the same threats to the islamic republic of iran from the rival , which is a main issue in the relations in deterrence , should be recognized as valid, as the zionists are worried about their generals, they are taking a stand, as they are saying that this action was a hasty action, the door to the shelters has been opened. it means that the actions clear their own space. the embassies are taking action. this shows that iran's threat is valid and this validity has been valid until now. so why does this issue lead to this ? the islamic republic is an actor against what actors it is. it

has shown its own military power, its own military quality and its own level of capability, and we can see it among the people right now. we can see that now the people are living their normal lives. actually , the threats of the other side had no effect on the normal lives of the people, but what happened to the other side? this has been understood, this understanding has been threatened. it seems to me that iran's response, as it has finally been decided, and now this action will be carried out at its appropriate time, has already left its effects in terms of deterrence, and the islamic republic of iran, unlike many analyzes that maybe in first of all, the islamic republic of iran generally does not respond to such discussions, this was a problem that they created, practically , the islamic republic always acted against any threat , not only the islamic republic, but also the elements of the resistance have the same level of deterrence. god willing

, if lebanon did not have a level of military capability and credibility, the regime of si-alan would have taken action in the north on the northern front. we see that the islamic republic of iran has various capabilities. in response, we see that they themselves are now evaluating the capabilities of the system. because i know that now, unlike the beginning of the second world war, the issue of deterrence is not only about nuclear capability , it is about various capabilities, because the threats are hybrid threats. the islamic republic of iran is now a media debate that has created the same power of its media. the opposing society shows that the islamic republic has the capability and credibility and the issue of stability means that the islamic republic has shown. he has reacted against every threat, but time and place, according to the words of this analyst that

you mentioned now, they are patient. it seems that the islamic republic of iran will definitely respond to the actions of the seminist regime at its right time, perhaps in the near future, but these threats now the zionists are announcing that it is interesting that now you see that the zionist threat has reached this point that we and the united states will respond, which means that even they do not see the capability in themselves to respond to the islamic republic and always emphasize on allies and rely on the powers of the islamic republic. they raise my old man i will sum up this part of your speech like this and i am reminded of that famous saying that the era of knocking on the door is over and iran's response has caused them

to know that it is impossible to carry out an operation, from the threat stage to the implementation stage. there is no answer. in principle, the islamic republic of iran and the people of iran throughout history are not warlike people. emphasized, but the point of discussion is that the other side is looking for war and so on in this situation, the islamic republic of iran sees its own inherent and defensive duty, and in this situation, it must return peace and stability by creating an effective deterrent. basically, they are now creating an image as if the word attack means the word that iran invades, these words are being solved to make the islamic republic a warmonger, while the reality

is that the islamic republic is a peace-loving, stability-seeking actor and knows that the spread of war in this region will the whole area hits, but an actor it is in our region that for nearly 80 years in occupied palestine, we are witnessing part of those discussions in the area of ​​peripheral areas in lebanon. syria has been creating insecurity in all regions for years, and now it is challenging the entire region and even the international arena. against this entity, capabilities must be brought into action and act with its credibility and stability in decision making. i would like to ask mr. kathirnejad a question about a ship that was seized today. first, i would like to mention the details of the news. some news sources reported the seizure of a ship belonging to the zionist regime near the strait of hormuz.

the associated press news agency has announced: military forces reached the ship's deck with the heliburn operation and seized it. the media announced the name of this container ship with the portuguese flag as the msc ariz. the last time this ship was near dubai was the strait of hormuz. in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, i offer my greetings to you, my dear viewers, your respected guests. i would

like to make a point following mr. ajarallu's instructions and then i will come to your service regarding this question of the republic. if we want to look a little higher, islam can be said to have an international mission in this reaction to the israeli terror , in fact, it can be said that it is an actor. in a way, an undesirable element in international relations in the region is breaking all international laws , and now iran has a mission to stop this actor and change this. don't let this become a tradition that this incident has no precedent and we don't see anything from him throughout history that he wants to attack diplomatic places so easily after for this reason, not only iran has the right, but it has a historical duty to react to this action . regarding whether

there is a connection between the seizure of this ship and revenge, it is definitely not unrelated. but i don't think it is very true that this relationship is an equal relationship, that is, the revenge that everyone is waiting for both in iran, israel and the whole world is definitely not the seizure of a ship, the measurements show that this will not be iran's revenge, exactly. if you see the reaction of even the world's public opinion, we have nothing to do with the world's authorities accept that this is a reaction against that reaction then continue. iran's threat is valid and the whole world will be waiting for iran's revenge, which is completely legitimate, but it will have an effect, that is , just as the attacks of the yemeni forces in bab al-mandeb were effective in supporting the palestinians , whatever happens in the strait of hormuz will definitely happen

. it will have an effect in supporting the palestinian people and reducing the pressure on the palestinian people . it will be effective. in fact , it may not be revenge for what happened in syria, but it will definitely help the palestinians in al-aqsa storm. what economic consequences do you think it might have ? from the economic point of view, since the end of november last year , ansarullah has been in trouble in babolmandab, and the level of threat has increased so much that it can almost be said that the economic shariah of israel has been completely cut off from this area. the israelis had to compensate this threat in some way from the economic point of view . they came up with a plan to create a land passage from the southern persian gulf countries to the zionist regime. obviously , the uae was one of the countries that supported

the israelis and it was included in this plan somehow it can be said that the israelis want, even though it costs a lot, to make a temporary replacement instead of the strait of babolmandb from the uae . well, what happened in the strait of hormuz, that israeli alternative option hit harm and showed that the strait of hormuz is no longer there. the israelis can't use it so easily, and it will block the land passage, of course , scenarios that will increase the difficulty of the ship's messengers reaching israel. there are, that is , there are much more extreme scenarios than this, what about ansar allah, what happens in the strait of hormuz today , it can still happen at low levels and higher events , such as the role of ansar allah in bab al-mandab , can be carried out in the eastern mediterranean by coast-to-sea missiles or dragons that the resistance forces

have there for israelis , if it is like that, the pressure will be far. it will be more. now, in relation to the events of ansarullah, the successes it has achieved, unfortunately , it has not been discussed in the media . it was an act that was just a show, if it did not have a serious impact on the israeli economy, but also the fact that the israelis are designing an alternative route in the uae for themselves, and now it has been hit again, which shows that he was a vital religious leader. it is important that they are looking for a replacement for him. thank you, mr. ajulo, mr. kathirnejad. referring to the economic debate, which has had various resistance responses for the zionist regime, one of its consequences is the discussion of public opinion. at the beginning of the program, we also saw a report that public opinion how is the world against the zionist regime and

iran's response has changed in favor of the resistance axis. public opinion also shows that they know what is right with iran, they know iran's action as a reaction , did the resistance front have a plan for this strategy, or did the crimes and events that happened in the field push them in this direction? we are facing an element in the region, we are facing a regime that for nearly 80 years in the region had various forms of currency development in a period of security development and then entered a sedition between islamic countries and entered an arena like this. and in different ways in this me. the islamic republic of iran and the axis of resistance have always prepared themselves by understanding this threat, that is

, the problem that existed was that these capabilities that we have today, we are referring to in the field of deterrence that the islamic republic of iran and the axis of resistance have in the sector professor kathirnejad rightly pointed out the discussion of the economic scholars that the supreme leader in the resistance was ready for this. today, we see that the axis of the resistance in line with its basic strategy is the unity of sahad or the unity of the fields, which is a kind of unity of decision-making and step by step. next, the unity of the front in the field, that is to be able to act in unity in the field of front and in the field of operations, these are the actions that the axis of resistance is fully prepared for, the only problem here was that the islamic republic of iran based on a basis that it has always emphasized that

it will never start it should not be the cause of war and insecurity at the regional level and should not be the initiator of a process . it has never entered these processes as an initiator, according to the strategy of the islamic republic, which has always been based on the peace and stability of the region and together based on the neighborhood policy. a very criminal act against the consular department they are familiar with politics and international law. well, our representative offices abroad have different levels . one department is the political department, where the ambassador is in that embassy , ​​where the ambassador is present in that department. it is political, but the consular section is a section where the people who refer to it are ordinary people, citizens use it for business affairs, whether they are citizens

of the host country or citizens who live there, and this action against a part of this section is actually an adventurous action. and it was an escalation itself, it was an increase in tension, and he started this, and that's the point. even his allies, that is, allies in the security council the meeting of the security council, although they did not show up to condemn this matter, but in a way, with their own words, that we were not informed, that we were not involved in this matter, that they did not want this ugliness of this case, and this in some way, in some way, that ugliness that may be stigmatized stick together and be a partner in this and the sisi regime has entered a new arena, its daily crimes in the gaza strip. the recent crimes in the last few days these settlers have against the people in the area where there is no war , there are twenty people in the occupied areas, people are going to the settlements, they

are bothering the people with their cars and their cars, that is all kinds of things. and all kinds of crimes have now entered a new arena, that is, they have come to violate international conventions. i said the consular section , i emphasize that the consular section is the section that people deal with, if these are the consequences of this citizen who was martyred there. heavy classes, that's why we see that the public opinion places this crime next to the crimes of the sanasi regime and points to it as a destabilizing factor. the issue here is that the officials who are allied with them are their allies. declare and declare that these actions are actions i don't know, they are killing now, we say personally , the entire structure of the asani war adventurer regime. student, but they are killing as netanya and they intend to punish him, that is, he has these disputes that he raises, these gold wars that we see, they are killing, because this is ugly, this case

is very explosive, the islamic republic of iran is in this situation. basically, the islamic republic of iran is finally a reasonable country, it has a powerful nation state , it is a country that has international credibility , it has international prestige, and all these are important to it, and the answer to this is for the islamic republic. it is a necessary thing and the world is supporting this issue. although nowadays they are announcing that they are raising other issues, they want to rebuild, but the point of the debate is that the islamic republic cannot leave this issue unanswered, and the more interesting thing is that even the organizations and even the powers that today we see in the last two or three days phone calls with diplomatic calls at different levels from the minister. regarding a discussion to different levels that we have now diplomatic traffic, they are all emphasizing and in a way they are giving the right to iran that it has reason and in trying, the interesting thing is this.

who are trying to say that the islamic republic should not use its right, and this is a debate that has almost been legitimized as a part of the country's political representation , a part of it is considered a part of the country's territory from a legal point of view, and this is an action to spread tension or is it the same escalation in the international arena that should be dealt with, ajarlu, you mentioned in your speech that even the sight of iran's attack has had an impact on the occupied territories and the authorities of mr. kathirnejad, pointing out that the dimensions of this answer may be diverse and wide. ok, in this regard, a zionist official means the former president the zionist intelligence organization has shown a reaction and said that it is possible that iran's response to the terrorist attack of the zionist regime on the consular section of the iranian embassy in damascus will have five scenarios

. according to amos yadlin, iran's strategic patience is one of these scenarios. a very hard blow. it is equal to about a little less than solmani and farhizda. on suleimani, by the way, they are more severe, on farahza, less. but the rhetoric i have heard from iran has not been like this before. all, הלידים אלמים, הנאסים, מוקטים קודם, all. i see five scenarios. the first, זה מידה, תמורת מידה, שגרירות, תמורת שגררות. the problem of האיראנים, that it is in a third country, they don't want to get involved with a third country, even though there are countries like azerbaijan and jordan, that they might be heading there. the second is זה כל השלוחים, דיבר אל זה נייר, דיברו על זה others, i think it is a possibility that they do not

consider it because... and we are not too impressed. the third thing is חזבלה. חזבלה can raise the level, we all know that it is on a low level. but also nasra la hachi shana. be careful not to be like her, and she will not attack you, friends. in syria iranians were hurt. i think it is the most reasonable alternative an alternative to shooting at iran. the iranians they did it several times, they did it after the defeat of soleimani on the basis of al-assad in iraq, they will see about 20 firecrackers, it is the american base, it is the elimination of the americans, after it they will see it on september 2019, the kind of mix that davidson spoke about פילי שיות, מלאטים, אולי טילים בליסטים, זה לא היה בסאודיה, and they did it 4 months ago, after there was a פיגע

בהלוויה של'. the mention of suleimani, they will see pakistan, a nuclear country, they will see kurdistan, they will see syria, on whom they see isis, that's why i believe that this is probably the most likely response, by the way, there are voices in iran, they say, we have strategic patience, we can wait, they are happy with the fact that we are here , and this is another time of strategic thinking, the united states and israel are moving away, the united states is fighting with israel, if we are going down. אל ישראל המטערבות בקראות, so בחישין אשרטגיט עשוע עשוע את את זה. you are the viewer of today's world. the conversation with mr. hossein ajarlou, an expert on west asian issues, and also mr. sohail kasirenjad, an expert on the issues of the zionist regime , continues on the subject of revenge and deterrence. mr. ajarlou, we have seen this conversation . now, we are witnessing the possibility of iran's response and reaction in

the occupied territories, from school closures, and i don't know, we are ready with all kinds of preparations . we are also witnessing the analysis of this model. do you think they can guess what scenario is on the table for iran? the power and the capability that i mentioned in your appeal , i was referring to the capability of the republic. and the power of the islamic republic is in different areas. well, when a large country like the islamic republic of iran has different capabilities , it has a strong strategic and strategic navy, and has a powerful missile and drone capability. in the fields of powerful media, it can be used in different dimensions in a combined war, which is different fields and different fields now.