i don't want to get into that for the time being, a story that all those who need it can be replaced by the price . they will buy gasoline from all the people who sell it. we need 20 to 30 million liters of gasoline a day. enter the society considering that we have a high consumption, my people. they are not the consumers of these cars, they are consuming them, we do not import cars, they are manufactured cars, the quality of which is higher in terms of consumption, and well, we have faradat , but it is not enough, now it is at the level of zero. it is a natural thing, it means we know that we are suffering from it now how is the government going to use this 203 million people? after all, people need them. those who want to consume should consume as much as they need, because it is not their hand, it is the machine. for example, the person who wants

to pay his expenses means that he wants to do something that gives him a service, he buys gasoline, and we have to , how are we going to give these 20 million liters or 30 million liters to the people, at what price are we going to give them to the people? are we going to do something so that the government won't put money out of its own pocket? well , if we are going to come with this 203 million, we will give the fab price , that is, the same price that the government will end up with, because he should enter this, he is going to divide whatever he produces. i assume that the balance between those who produce a tolty in everything , and everything else is subsidized, no, you see, we are going to have this subsidy, for example, whatever the number is, for example , say 100 units, for example, now he is explaining between the car owners, these 100 units and those who they don't have cars, he explains. naturally, the share of car owners will decrease. this is explained in the form of the number of liters of gasoline. he says that he is not going to pay money . he says that i have 90 million lei and 100 million lei in production. it has been 18 years or more, for example, lower.

i want to give 15 liters to everyone, so let's assume that those who are born or turn 18 years old are balanced with those who die, that is, nothing is going to be added, but with all the conditions, if we consider it constant, we will have 23 million less in the same situation. we are going to talk about how much this 15 liters is going to cost for the production of our refinery. for example , let's say that the construction of our refinery is going to add 6 million liters to us in the best case in the next few years , which is no different in the main issue, that is, we have to build a refinery now. millions of 10 million of the money that the government gives has the same price as the refinery he calculates, that means you have to buy it, whether you import it or take it from the refinery , it doesn't matter, mr. nawaz , how will the remaining 20 million be compensated? in the current situation, the amount of explanation and the amount of increase will be determined. i say right now, what do you do with this deficit

? we are not going to solve all the problems in the fuel sector by implementing the plan of allocating subsidies from cars to individuals. this is how the government explains the subsidy it is giving now he explained to all those who have cars and don't have a production deficit of 20-30 million liters that he is importing. how can he supply it ? does he have a production deficit or not? that's it. i said, look, we are not supposed to immediately resist the increase in consumption with a plan that we are implementing. i say that if we do not take this action, we will have an increase in consumption. now it is almost close to his orders, but let me tell you one thing, you see, concerns are appropriate, mr. engineer, that is, when a change is wanted to happen, when there is a reform, everyone has concerns

, that's right, the concerns must be answered in the specialized fields, we are now witnessing parallel discussions in this field. that is, every technical expert talks about this in his own specialized field , there is no agenda to reach a consensus , the majlis research center gives its opinion, experts' opinions are presented in the media, but the government does not have a specific agenda to reach a consensus. it should be formed and all these discussions that we have now in the debate we will do it, and let me say one thing that now , look at the part that was cut off. to the ministry of oil in this matter that you do not import in any way , cover any amount of consumption, implement a non-price solution, but the people

should not be dissatisfied. that is, these are dream cases. at least we did these non-price solutions. now we want an inexpensive solution. let's have the government wants to do how to consume the real maker behind these decisions of ours, whether it is the private sector, whether it is a fuel station, whether it is the people , they should not be crushed by these decisions. well, here the government wants a tool. our current tool, allocation of fuel subsidy with literage and fuel card , is not the answer to those cases. this is definitely necessary. that is, the prerequisite for all these decisions that the government or even the companies subordinate to the ministry of oil make. this change and amendment of mr. bozoran, see the security requirements of the defense of the issues related to the ministry of oil regarding the provision of explanation and monitoring of all these concerns should be seen in the issue . that we want to control consumption simply

because we want to have justice in the explanation of subsidies , all these concerns must be answered, but we believe that if the first step is to allocate subsidies . don't turn to your owner instead of yourself . we can't explain the current situation to allocating gasoline and gasoline subsidy to the national code. saying how, at what price, in what form, the government will come to explain this thing that we have a deficit now, if all the subsidies are allocated to the national code. let's see if we want to solve the fuel shortage or gasoline shortage. let's solve the country, in my opinion, not that we should solve it, how should we explain it, the government is going to do it, yes, we now had an increase of 140 million liters to 152 million liters , we are now doing the explanation, it is correct with any model, now i explained again, i said,

we don't have the explanation. we don't want to explain gasoline or gasoline subsidy to all people to solve this problem exactly, we want them to take a step for this problem. it means that the government cannot allocate more than the basic price to the people, but the existing situation means the amount the subsidy that is calculated, that's why what i saw is actually the published material . in the current situation, the research center allocates this quota in such a way that the government does not add anything, as you say, to this problem, in fact, these additional resources are added to this problem . you assumed it was correct

, no, there are about 60 million people over the age of 18. see, you were considering all the tithes . see, now we have an explanation for the subsidy that we have, 4500 tomans, which cannot be distributed to all people, it is not 45 anymore. we can't even talk about the second step. we executed the first step correctly . so, excuse me, we did the first step. now we are ready for the second step. the second step is technically done . what is the second step? the second step is that according to the national gasoline code

as for our production, which is characteristic, we assume that we don't have an increase in population, we have an increase in consumption, and right now one. i don't have a question about distribution, i have a question about supply. the government comes and says, sir, i have the same number as i have 90 to 100 and i will divide it. for example, if 60 million are distributed, they will divide 15 liters and 90 million per person. yes, but we will divide 20 to 30. we have a million deficit, which means that the government must compensate, and those who have a mechanism will be provided , for example, the energy exchange, i have no business, and those who do not have cars sell to those who do. i say that because every day our demand is 20-30 million reais per day, this is not a good market to say, for example, it can find it at its own price, so the price will go up, so we don't even have a discussion , so now the government remains as the main actor by

importing 20-30 million liters per day in this network that we created, if there is a demand, well, that means the government, if the government wants to control, it means everything. is it possible that the price will go to a place where it is the same as fob? well, maybe it will get worse. well, now the government wants to come and supply this 20-30 million liters per day , because it has to be supplied eventually, some people need it. my question is, let's assume that your first step is done. let's assume at all. i say, let 's assume at all. we have reached the second step, where

the government's order in the sale of gasoline is allocated with what is the base price. it does not mean an increase in the price of gasoline and it has nothing to do with it if they want to talk or confront this plan with volume, they say this increase in the price of gasoline , who is saying such a thing, see

, when you allow 15, i will let you explain. your toman does not come close to fob when the price limit is 3,000 tomans at the gas station . when i can go to the gas station and get 3,000 tomans of gasoline, why should i go to fob? for example, if you calculate 60 cents , why should it be able to reach 15 litos? the price between the base price and the subsidy that is provided to the people can be maneuvered and sold at the current free price, which means that if i have 1,500 tomans in the supply and demand market, i cannot offer more than 3,000 tomans. because 3,000 tomans are being offered right now , and what is the government doing about the deficit of 203 million, as you say, the government is currently compensating for the deficit, my question is what will it do

, your problem is if the second step is the model that has been proposed. we were not proposers, we only studied if it is as any person, that is, in every householder receives 15 liters, which means he is receiving 1500 tomans for 15 liters . he can give this credit to others, but he cannot give it to others for more than 3,000 tomans . do you consider this credit to be a fixed price? the price set by the government on the government rate is 3,000 tomans, but that is 1,500 tomans. i

don't have a car. i want to give it to others. there is a gap between 1,500 tomans and 3,000 tomans. i can maneuver . it's not like i have 1,500 tomans. to offer thousands of tomans to people, so i understood look, he said that the deficit should be reduced. well, look , i told you that in order to solve the problem of the deficit, i.e. increasing it, now i have a more important question

. what can actually be put on paper is that the person who now means justice means that they say that a person with a 15-liter car receives nothing, that is , his car does not receive anything . this share is increasing according to the number of people in his family it is with that one person who sometimes has two cars, well, this is actually justice, now when we want to

use the increase, in fact, it is more than that 15 liters. what are we going to do right now if our 60 liters is enough for us? there is fuel in the station, i should use it , that is, between these 15,000, you have to pay more than that. this plan will reduce consumption, it cannot be said for sure, and it is not planned to implement this plan, but it can give the government the opportunity to think about those areas as well. i mean, he should think about that part of me, why, because he is identifying the real consumer, thank you , let me understand your words, if i am not mistaken , i will say that we will get the gasoline fairly, now i will not explain

equally, let's divide it fairly, but the price will be the same. shouldn't the price change, but now it's 10-20% , which is supposed to be something, but no , i also said that if there is a second one, it will be up to, for example, a ceiling of 30. well, the same, we are supposed to change the method of distribution with this one. we have a shortage of gasoline, and the government spends the money it has, and now... let's solve the problem, yes. it's true that you are saying that we need to explain it and fix it, but i say that there should be no other way to provide it. your statement means that you are saying that the government should come and make fuel more expensive. what other way do you suggest a way? we don't have a way to increase the price except increase the price . if the price increase was supposed

to solve our problem, then we don't believe in the price increase. that's right. we want to change the current situation and the method of explanation of his friends . yes, i say. well, mr. nawaz said that if he believes i think that i don't believe anymore, no, no, see , gasoline is becoming more expensive now , like gas, 20-30% every year, which i think should be done, but it should be done logically, but our problem is that you believe in shock at all. you don't believe in a gradual increase. yes , you see, every year, for example, everything becomes more expensive . well, let's say 20% 30% every year like other things , but our main problem is that we have a discussion about the devaluation of the national currency. with its speed , let's say the dollar specifically, whatever you increase, give a shock, give temporary housing, then two or three this year, you have to put money, which means that

the global price of gasoline has not changed, our money is becoming worthless, and no matter how much it goes up, it cannot make up for it , but now the government is in a situation where it says it will do with imports, it must make up for this deficit, so this explanation is equal to one one of the things is to compensate for this, if the price is to be fixed, we only changed the way of explanation, the problem is very important, you see , because 100 verses cost 90,15 to 15,000 tomans, you calculate it, 30,000 to 15,000 tomans, 1,500

, we cannot think of a dream. in the current situation, which has non-price solutions, it puts pressure on the people you can see this collection of azad cards. during eid, every second a news is published in this field , there are non-price solutions , it puts pressure on the real consumer. too much to the organization of distribution and production and transportation of petroleum products in order to use non-price solutions to control consumption . the current structure is not possible. they are getting fuel at a reasonable price is it available now or the price that will come later or whatever, the government wants a tool, this tool

is not possible in the current situation, but if the allocation of fuel subsidy is transferred from the car to the people , this tool will be available to the government , which you see, for high consumers, for mala, no , you are very interested in controlling consumption in this field. now let's assume that there is no way to do it because our cars have problems. it actually allocates the subsidy to individuals the society is not happening, distribution and transportation, and various activists are also suffering losses with the current method, we are without a doubt in the issue of using the fuel card, the solutions that exist, we are really suffering a lot of hardship , we are suffering, and we see that people are unhappy with this situation. i saw your polls in rome

, the majority of people agreed that they actually agreed with the allocation to individuals. now i think we had 7 different doors . the way that i am grateful for your presence in the market people can exchange prices there , for example, if i don't have a car, but i have gas, my share will be my share , anyway, i want to hand over my gas there at whatever price is determined by the current value and demand . do you agree or disagree ? because we have billions on the daily side of the demand side, it always goes to the purchase page of one item, so that means we are all on the buying side, or the demand side, the price is always on the rise, the consumption is always on the rise, so here the government becomes the main player by entering the day of 2030.

open million liters if it is to discover the price and the government should not give money for this work. well, this price should be the same as the price of foaming, that is, 40 to 50 thousand tomans per liter. now, the above price , because the government is only going to supply it , let's give everyone the shares. let's take a look. millions , for example, everything we have, we gave a lot of numbers and divided it among all the people. now, how many million liters of gasoline we allocated are we giving as a subsidy, that is , 1500 tomans. you know, we say 3 thousand tomans as a subsidy, but you assume that 3 thousand tomans are a subsidy. look at it this way. let's assume that this is the number. well, whatever we have, we will give subsidies now the amount is a bit much because when we are talking about gasoline, it is 40,000 tomans. it can be a subsidy, so we say, sir , that we have provided the conditions for those who we delivered to be able to sell them and sell them at whatever price they want, so

it is nothing but that all those who do not need to sell to all those who need, well, because the price goes up. above, we need to reduce things by 20-30 million reeds a day. we are faced with a need. in your case, you are actually saying that the government should come to that market and sell its gasoline in such a market where the price can be discovered. look at the government. if he doesn't enter that market, he says, "sir, whoever he wants can come, for example, whether he enters that market or not, for example, i will sell it at the price of my atom . well, if this price is lower than the price that he will finish for himself, it will be fob, that's all." the same amount of the subsidy has become more expensive, only gasoline has made no difference. if he comes, reduce this amount, that is , he will come and tell me the same 3 tomans and 5 tomans, and now let's do it, for example, 1000 tomans, and he will pay 15 thousand

tomans . that in the discussion of fuel supply, now in the discussion of explanation, we have issues, well, we have issues with allocation to the national code will not be solved if we create all the conditions, except that we will have a strange price shock, so please forgive a question. it happens here that you said that we have 20-30 million liters, for example, i would like to tell you that we are importing at the price of fauba. let's assume that, for example, it has 20-30 million liters . it will be very expensive for the government. the 100 million liters that the government it is producing, at what price should it be offered ? that's my argument, that's all. look, now this thing that the government doesn't actually produce has been privatized, so it means a refinery right now. let's make it. there is gasoline inside the country. the government should buy it at the fab price. it doesn't matter to the government . this gasoline is being produced inside the country. well , the number that it pays is one. well, the key

is what it will look like later, and the quality will decrease. it doesn't work, it means what is produced internally, it means that right now the government is buying gasoline at the fob price , it is buying it from the refineries, it doesn't matter how it is explained, you are assuming that the government has no problem, i have already given this , i have this number. but we want to discuss, don't go into import , you say, sir, the money i spend is inside my country is spending money, i am giving this money, my production is being used, look at this figure, but the surplus that you have to import with one, you have to pay for it is a high number, so now, for example, the government will see how much a liter of gasoline is bought from bandar abia star refinery in the persian gulf, for example, it is going to say about now they themselves have to buy the fob price. now that you are talking about how much it is going to buy, you should see how much they have to say something themselves, because like when they give something, their representatives should say it. octane, for example, is this much

now, for example, each octane decreases so much, but if you want normal, it should be bought at the fob price from the refineries. now that these things are not happening , why is this happening right now , mr. nawaz jamandi, you have four minutes, we are strongly with the dollarization of fuel prices. we strongly disagree, because we have the native conditions of our own country, economic, political , social, all of these should be taken into consideration , but the fact that we left a part of the people aside, we say that it is from the decisions. our price or non-price in the field of fuel, if you are damaged, pay compensation, but when there is a subsidy, you should stand by this it is not fair, and in the field of technical implementation, let me explain. look, we have very good infrastructure. now , with the efforts that the fuel stations of the companies under the ministry of benef have been making in the past few years , we have powerful subs. we spend 100 million tomans in a single fuel station and

we have very good infrastructure. thank you very much to both guests. the program, all the good viewers of the higher program, who have accompanied us until this moment , may god protect you, or alia , i am higher today, wherever

you see it, it is called an installment purchase, whatever it is. if you want to come to sarra , show us the different accessories of each model, don't worry about buying . they have a variety of prices. come to sarra. and isfahan until 2 o'clock in the morning in tehran, i am your host. will you be my guarantor? no, i won't. what's going on, go out, go, go, first money, card, card, card, go out, go, give, give, give. don't do this again. does the city of home appliances want a guarantee? don't you want he doesn't want it, let's go and get it for you. in the city of home appliances, any account make a total of you win this.

in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. may god bless muhammad and the family of muhammad and hasten their death. greetings and good morning to you , dear and respected viewers. welcome to sports news president seyed ebrahim raeesi and speaker of the islamic council mohammad baqer qalibaf congratulated the nation of iran and especially the sports community for the powerful championship of our country's national cultural wrestling team in the asian games of kyrgyzstan in separate messages. the national team of our country won 9 gold, silver and bronze medals.