in the name of god, ladies and gentlemen, hello, i am alireza hashemzadegan with the world today , minister. the ministry of foreign affairs warned about any adventurism of the zionist regime and announced that iran will respond more strongly to any miscalculations of this regime. mr. amir abdullahian, who is in new york , said in a meeting with his brazilian counterpart, mauro: "iran's military action in response to the crimes of the zionist regime took place within the framework of legitimate defense and international law, minister." foreign affairs in

a meeting with the presence of the ambassadors of the member countries of the organization of islamic cooperation in response to the downing of several small birds during the defense operation of our country in isfahan, he said: the media supporters of the zionist regime tried to make a victory out of their defeat again and magnify this issue, while the downed small birds did not cause any financial or life damage. the news that the world's media was waiting to cover. as washington says as an ally of telavi, israel attacked iran last night . the media of the region intervened. al-mayadeen gathered his reporters from ramallah and baghdad to tehran and washington. atomic energy

said iran's nuclear centers were not harmed. al-mayadeen reporter responded to what the zionists said they have called it an air attack on iran . he published a picture of a small toy bird. this is israel's answer. one of the arab users wrote israel's answer to iran by showing the flight of a paper plane:

he wrote: congratulations for all your tenure in the ministry of national defeat. and you summed up the membership of the cabinet in one word. bin guer lapid , the former prime minister of the zionists, messed up the sentence . ben guer made a joke of israel with a one-word tweet. makhol, an expert on zionist issues living in haifa, says:

israel is coming to believe that it does not have the ability to impose itself on the region. israel is dealing with the tarnishing of its credibility in the region, and a lebanese author, by publishing an archival image of the commanders of the revolutionary guards addressing the zionist leaders , satirized their inability to threaten iran. : iran has acquired advanced weapons that can paralyze israel's defense system. according to this newspaper

, experts say that iran has electromagnetic pulse weapons at its disposal using laser light. invisible microwaves and electromagnetic energy work, and if these weapons are used, the operation of the fighters will be disturbed by electricity and gps, and the communication of the bases will be cut off, and defense and attack will become impossible. daily mail published this report after that. iran had warned the zionist regime that it had weapons that it had not used. according to this report, the us had also expressed concern about iran's progress in the field of making such weapons in 2000.

now, in the case of tonight's program, the host, mr. sohail kesirinejad, an expert on the issues of the zionist regime and also, mr. seyed seyed pejman madani, we are an expert in military and strategic affairs until the latest situation. let's check it after receiving the answer from iran. mr. kasrinejad, let's start with you. today, a tweet was published in the morning by the

zionist minister of internal security. and they accused him of what he said and in fact. he had put forward a summary regarding the story of the little birds . do you want to tell me exactly what ben goyer said in his one-word tweet and then more about it? let's talk in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. hello , i would like to serve you and the dear guests and the dear people of iran. first of all, netanyahu, since sunday, that is , a few hours after iran's response to israel's crime in the consulate.

we must return deterrence to israel in the middle east, and he said that if the reaction we want to show is a weak reaction, now with the slang term he used, it is useless, deterrence will not return to us, and not even a verbal one. he used to say that in the middle east, sabkhone should show his crazy game, which of course he is sabkhone. in fact, the middle east also considered israel as the home of the middle east in a way. when this attack happened this morning, which i probably shouldn't call it an attack, he re-tweeted the word "sholool" and said, "by the way, it's a reaction. it was the same reaction that i said shouldn't be like that, and he repeated all those stories with the same

word in his mind." the israeli audience said that not only this deterrence reaction cannot bring back to israel what they had lost , but now they are already at home, and the israeli authorities had a very negative reaction. i mean, we can almost say that all israeli officials from every faction reacted to this , now with their own positions, for example, lapid announced that, in fact, netanyahu's speech, excuse me , bengivir's speech, bengivir, the minister of national security, said that no security minister has ever melli had not harmed israel's national security so much and added in response to this tweet. benguivir took israel's reputation from tehran to washington with this tweet, now why are they putting the blame on ben gower? ben gower seems to have only painted the face of the problem. among all the factions in israel, which

is now represented by the national religious faction and the extremist faction , benguir is the one who insisted the most that we should attack first, and this attack should happen as soon as possible and with the greatest intensity. they pointed out that this attack has a heavy impact . some people say that we should not go towards it. now, if we can also examine the reactions they have , that is, what are their comments in front of iran's attack, it will be clear that you should attack them the hardest it was virier, so these are all in fact placing the blame on benguir, while a large part of this is the fault of the politicians, a large part of it is the responsibility of the officials and military commanders , and finally, the sum of the decisions they made caused israel to be in such a situation. thank you very much. another question about the zionist situation. i also have from you. since saturday, when iran responded, until now , we have had numerous reports in the news that they

are holding a meeting of the security cabinet and django, later or later it will end without results or it will be canceled at all. it will be postponed to another time. the past, well, we exactly since the attack on israel, we have seen those rockets and drones that israel started to show the first reactions. that we strongly want to respond, these were the first reactions, i say, within the first few hours of the attack, but then, when the consequences of the attack became clear for the israelis , the positions differed a little, perhaps it can be said that the peak of these internal conflicts was in the meeting that took place on sunday the night means how many hours, in fact, one day after the attack, it happened in the cabinet meeting, there was a 3 and a half hour meeting of the war cabinet. it took a long time and finally no decision was reached. this causes it actually showed that the differences are much greater

than what was thought and that the israelis did not reach a consensus at all, contrary to what they were saying for almost two weeks that we reached an internal consensus. after that, numerous meetings were held , that is, at least five meetings of the political and security cabinet were held, three times at least a meeting of the war cabinet was held, and almost four times the meeting of the general cabinet, in which all ministers are present. there were also some interesting points, first of all, maybe a marginal point is that all these meetings were held under the nobles of the resistance forces, to the point where in one of these an interesting incident happened in the public cabinet meetings . one of the senior officials of mossad, who is a lady who is nearing the end of her service, is going through the process according to the internal instructions of mossad. in the political security cabinet and in the war cabinet , he presented to the israeli officials because of

his protection and security position, and in public cabinet meetings , he was forbidden to present it because his identity would be revealed, but here, because the circumstances were very special, this instruction was put aside and he came. in that meeting and at the beginning of his conversation, he said that i am anything now i am saying in this meeting that iranians are listening and my identity has been completely revealed to them because of this presence in this meeting, of course his identity was revealed much earlier than this, but now the main points that were raised were that the summary of this 56 after four or five meetings, the israelis had almost arrived at 6 different reactions and they could never combine them together . we have to show iran a reaction, but this did not happen in the second reaction of smotrich smotrich also showed a national face. he gave a third reaction that

he gave an interesting interview. he said that he is worried about the words of the military that i hear and i feel that the defeat we suffered in the week of october is lurking for us again, so i defend the harsh reaction. i do not and i am not a supporter of israel wanting to launch a severe military attack on iran, and this is not in our interest . they strongly insist that if america does not come to our work, we cannot show any reaction, of course they mean it the reaction was successful and they said that whether in defense against iran or in any attack against iran , america should be there. if america doesn't come, it is better that we don't show any reaction. when i heard these words, i suddenly remembered the story of lalit al-mabit , which all the infidels want to gather because

this was the third opinion. this was the third opinion. the fourth reaction was related to the left-wing currents that said, "iran, why did we get involved in iran at all? we are now in gaza." we are engaged in a war. it is a full-scale war. the goal of this war was to destroy the epic. the goal was to free the prisoners. all these are out of the agenda of the government, so we have to go to them and it is not logical at all what we are doing with iran now. he enters the war, he remembers their main problems exactly and they kept repeating one phrase , this was the argument that this is the deviation that netanyahu is creating in the war, so you should know that the leftists are not allowed to enter the cabinet meetings , that means they are not in the cabinet. they brought up and said that, sir, the reaction against iran should be that we sanction iran with drones and missiles. when he says that, he means

the west. they are saying this because they have said something . iran's missile is now operating freely , it is under the most severe sanctions, not for years now, it has been under the most severe international sanctions . in a week, when america said that we want to give a diplomatic response to iran, i was looking at the criticisms in the media. the internationals themselves say that there is no other sanction at all that we want to apply against iran. the very fact that they want to use a tool that is not in their hands shows the desperation they have in the field and now they are calling for it in diplomacy. turn it into a the success and opinion and the last and last reaction was that it was from gallant's side and with the support of netanyahu . it was that we should return the jango front to gaza and lebanon and we should look for achievements there . we cannot achieve any special achievements against iran. thank you for referring to the zionist situation and the point of view which said that we have no chance against iran without america

. and it comes to the background of the reports that israel is planning to attack twice بایران وترفه به i don't know this and there may be things i don't know, i do know how to tell you that everyone who is even on the road to lower the fire from the medical level and create some kind of representation while you are there. plus or minus 100 air vehicles that are in the sky of the middle east at the same time, they are the moment they put their air bombs in the air and the ground and they went out for some kind of attack on iran . for our defense, this also requires that

our alliances are around us, and for us to attack without detail not only the countries that we talk less about here. america and the election partnership are more important, and we need to prepare it properly, send planes 1500 kilometers from here, send our children, our planes, we need to make sure that they return safely, and it takes time to plan it, and we need to adapt to it, but be patient. there is such a feeling here in the country . strong at the moment, it is in the top of the list of edifices we are still with you in the world today

. i will continue the conversation with mr. seyed pejman madani, an expert on military and strategic issues. . no matter what they do after that, they cannot make up for that failure. these 6-7 months have passed , we have seen exactly the same, that is, they could not return the credit they had lost with what they did in gaza , not even with military operations, the prisoners who were lost and returned from saturday until now. the opinion of the zionist is to receive an irreparable blow to any of these options, such as mr. kathirinejad. he said he can't get them out of the situation they are stuck in. what do you think about iran and the reaction it showed, what characteristics and coordinates did it have that took them to the corner of the ring and they can't get out of there, in the name of god? rahman al-rahim, greetings to you, dear guests and viewers, i have to say

that first, let's say an introduction about , of course, even though there was a need to pay more attention to soft war and mixed war, but well the declaration of who will be our answer and in front of the integrated network that the us has launched for air defense in the middle east and wants a uniform network whose components are now located in different countries on different ships in different places. this was able to succeed in iran's attack, it was able to defeat different layers of defense , from the layer of standard missiles and

the american aegis destroyers in the sea, from those that operate at the longest range, to the aero or kheds systems in their own language, yes, these in the long range, it engages with missiles, the next layer the americans, who were stationed in different areas of long-range radars such as the grim pine radars and other radars that were stationed in the region and inside the occupied lands, the flakhan daoud or davidsling systems, which they had developed for tactical and medium-range missiles, were involved. and even the iron dome, which was intended for short range. it seems that in front of some of our raining missiles, in front of those bombs that are separated from this missile

, it creates a large number of missiles in the sky , getting involved and not being able to achieve the necessary success. well, some people bring up, they say that iran fired a lot of missiles, but there were few hits. how do you consider this a success? i have to say that, look, when a door is broken and entry is made, this is a success anyway. whether it is with a small number or with a large number , because iran's response was supposed to be, for example, one on the scale of a slap, which we saw in ain al-asudam, we did not consider a large number of hits, the number of hits that was planned was probably the same. this is what has been done, now we don't know what is going on in the minds of the commanders just passing by, but based on the similar example we had in ain al-aswad, it seems that the same number of hits was intended, and the next point

is that they raise a discussion here that now i have international analysis, i say i have nothing to do with it, allow me a moment. this is an important point , and that is that when these defense systems are saturated and can no longer prevent this number of hits , where is it in the most protected, most protected, most protected place on earth, that is navatim , yes, the navatim base, which is near the dimona nuclear power plant and centers they are very sensitive when it was hit here and there and the missile defense systems were saturated. if we fired 100 to 200 to 1000 to 200 other missiles after that, they would have hit. the message was that we could be closer to the term. the most important message was that this security system of yours failed. thank you. in the past few days, another point that i have seen in the analysis and conversations is being mentioned, that iran

rained missiles on israel, which, for example, has a nuclear warhead. he had done the same to iran in ain al-aswad , he had hit the american base, which is a weapons warehouse their core in the world includes a large number of bombs. today, i saw a report on the israeli network. let me quote it directly, it says that no country in the world has ever carried out such a large-scale attack with ballistic missiles. this shows that this event was bigger than israel. my question is the rockets that iran fired to reach nawatin , what other messages did they take with them?

much stronger than the regime can't attack us , we actually prepared ourselves for such a situation and i think in practice even saturday is the same. happening fell, it means that the fighters and defenses that came against iran's missiles were the same as what you say, that is, the americans , english, and french put all their capabilities in the region, and it was not just about the defense of the zionist regime. it is making a fabric for itself in the middle east, each of its parts are stationed in one country or on ships in different places , but this spider's web that it had woven showed this attack that iran can split, of course, this should not make us proud. this has the potential to be dangerous

for us, we should feel that we are really in a war. nowadays, the concept of war has changed, war is not a concept of zero and one, as in the old days, so if two armies march and stand in front of each other and shoot, this is not a war. we have to accept that we are really in a war, from the economic aspect , to the cultural aspect, to the political aspect , and we also see military strictness that helps in these dimensions. we have to accept this and know that it should be a part of our lives and not think that if we neglect the enemy, they will neglect us. now, in the public space of the society, they are laughing at him a lot, even making fun of him, that some rockets miss him, but this was actually able to change the deterrence of the palestinians in the previous wars with the gaza regime.

he couldn't do such damage to them. one important reason is the completion of the iron dome, which really stopped the palestinian rockets from deterring them . well, of course, there is one point that we used and this missile defense network of the us and the regime. you destroyed the zionist and you were able to show that these were the penetration of the previous generations of our missiles, the new missiles they were built to deal with these missile defense systems. this analysis is correct. these days, they say that the zionist regime and the united states used all their latest generation defense facilities and technology , but iran did not use its latest technology. yes, it is the same. official officials announced that iran's new missiles, especially fattah fattah

, have a characteristic name. if there is going to be a serious conflict, these missiles are probably the first wave and the missile defense systems themselves will be the target , as it was able to hit. in addition to saturation, you can also hit these systems and disable them. thank you very much. we have a report ready. i want to see the report together. after that , we will continue the conversation. attack. we did. this is the picture. that one said that eyewitnesses also saw the explosion of the attack. they also filmed it. this film was published by a european media and the image you saw by the zionist newspaper jalo zalem post on their online pages. when we went to the comments section of the posts, a user wrote that a little familiar picture it seams. it was familiar because jerusalem skin about 2 years ago the same photo with the position of the war in

gaza. had published as written by the qatar arab network, this film is also related to the lebanese hezbollah's missile attack on the al-jalil region in occupied palestine. the publication of materials like these, which only want to show the situation in favor of the zionists , may be the front of the battle that this gentleman is talking about. shalmo bebrum, the former head of the zionist regime's army, who in an article written by israel has launched a campaign on social networks, and his main goal is to influence people's opinions. it is public. israel in the current development is cognitive warfare. a form of war by carrying out intelligence operations with the aim of influencing the thoughts of the other party in a conflict, some of these intelligence operations have already been unveiled. for example, about two months ago, the minister of foreign affairs of ireland said: israeli working groups launched a stream of false information against a pro-palestinian organization in order to undermine its performance. these

working groups, in addition to disseminating information. incorrect , they also have another duty to gain the support of public opinion , for example, after the al-aqsa storm operation , the european media politico wrote in a report that israel barrage it has started advertising and sending tens of content to millions of people, which tells the story that israel's attacks are legitimate. the ministry of foreign affairs of israel has published more than 75 advertisements on youtube and conducted 30 advertising operations on twitter, which were viewed more than four million times.