[000:00:00;00] he sent a message to hajj qassem soleimani with us in the position of the president that you should not worry . their bases and their forces remain far from the eyes of the people. well , look at how effective amir abdullahian is as a diplomat, how far his effect can go, and how far his effect can go. i will read the shahnameh about the role of a woman who succeeded in a rational diplomacy of war. prevent iran and a neighboring country

this is the role of diplomats, but a diplomat who knows his own values , believes in the same principles and values, knows the world , has the tools of diplomacy and can be a strong negotiator with the right orientation of shahid raisi in the foreign policy of the 13th government of mr. amir abdullahian became the most excellent, most honest, most successful executor of that foreign policy. did you notice that when he was proposed as the foreign minister, he was one of the options, and mr. raisi was looking for a foreign minister. three or four people were named. i wrote an article and an interview. i said that mr. amir is the best option

abdallahiane and to say why mr. amir. abdullahian, i told these two stories : his successful management at the bahrain embassy and his successful negotiations with the americans in baghdad, and fortunately, he was elected as the foreign minister, and today he is proud and proud at the pinnacle of honor of the iranian nation as a martyred foreign minister, this positive aspect shines. the story is that, of course, a person feels a little happy in his heart, but the negative side of all these points that you said is that it shows the damage to the country that we lost such a person. was mr. raisi was tired of being tired

, as if mr. raisi he felt that in the past years, his service had not been placed in the position of direct communication with the people, their demands and needs, and therefore , when you saw mr. raisi in the beghouleh, when in the mines, when with the koper residents, when in the deprived places of the country, he was very honest. he was listening to people's words very interestingly and quickly moving from these situations, as it was mentioned in the words of the leader of the revolution in the meeting with the family of martyr raisi that, for example, he was one hour away from moscow, negotiating in karaj a few hours later. a trip he had gone to the province and even, for example , had not returned to my home, as far as the distance between these two and this zero

service flight. and their sacrifice was on a provincial trip, and they are going on a provincial trip for a foreign event , which was the same thing between iran and azerbaijan . this is really a sign of pride for the servant of the islamic republic. why did these crowds come for mr. raisi? . his pictures were seen a lot in the world, yes, yes, some people even criticized the affairs of the current affairs, because sometimes the problems were not solved, but why did they come so mournfully and enthusiastically, with a sense of duty, because two seeing something in mr. raisi, mr.

raisi's pure integrity, mr. raisi's restless spirit of service , and this caused people to express themselves in the streets in tabriz, qom, birjan, and meshe. in tehran, the people are blizzarding the people once again introducing themselves to the world as a new identity that we are with those who serve us , those who devote themselves to us, how do we honor them in the city of mashhad numbering 3 million i came up this morning with fuji tv. i had an interview yesterday, being in mashhad, it was hard to be influenced by the presence of the people of mashhad, maybe the media we can't convey this to the world

, my pictures, we are seeing them once again, yes, and it was such a presence, this love relationship that exists between the people and the officials, there is a system and there is leadership, wherever this equation is formed, it gives the answer that they are mourning, but their hearts are strong. it was for the revolution, for

the imam, for the leadership, and the speech of the imam and the leadership was like water that fell on the fire of their pains and gave peace and relief. we are one. we are living in a military and let it be said that mr. raisi is truly remembered. i have known him for 35 years. first of all, where and when are the characteristics that we the relationship with friends who graduated from the indian subcontinent . the relationships we had with them. i was the ambassador to japan almost 30 years ago. he is the head of the general inspection organization. he was a country, he had come to japan on a trip. the characteristics that i saw during his stay there, personally, he is a character in many of the characteristics that our elders said, i don't want

to repeat mr. raisi, he was what he pretended to be , he lived a life of faith when a person lives his whole life healthy with clean hands. he lives with the love of serving the people . you can't put a price on these essences, these gems a president left in such an atmosphere and people honored mr. amir abdullahian in this way . i told him that he worked in a region , he was an expert in this region, he knew the problems of this region . arabic is not good. today , the elders of the region are talking about amir abdallahian

, and he had to leave the ministry of foreign affairs, where his home was, where he was working. let me tell you that with my expertise, when he went to the parliament the majlis

had laid a good foundation by the late martyr hossein sheikhul-islam, and the role of the majlis in the palestinian conferences of islamic countries for palestine, well, he continued in the same way with a more expert program. a few very successful meetings were held in tehran. amir abdollahian contacted the same expertise for my communications. a region with russia, russia was not present in regional issues. when the americans came, russia dominated iraq, in fact , it did not get involved in the iraqi issue, even the trucks that had iraqi equipment from the russian embassy. take away bombing, we were upset with

russia, why is russia not playing a role in the region and why is it leaving the field open for the americans? in my talks with mr. lavrov, the russian foreign minister , one of my priorities was: when do you want to be russia? when do you want to show your capacity, mr. amir abdullahian is one of the people. it was that he was updating russia on regional issues and bringing him closer to the positions of the islamic republic, that is, the view of the islamic republic on regional issues . what was the key role of russia, that is, that iran was able to bring russia to the square in the syrian war ? again, the sequence of mr. amirab's actions, the actions

of mr. amir abdullahian, and the shooting of haj qasim, that is , the meeting that our martyred general haj qasim had with putin completely justified them that you he must come to syria, and the coming of sardar diplasish, amir abdullahian, was the martyred sardar midanish. haj qasim is interesting. in the previous memory that you mentioned , the same thing happened in iraq, that is, first mr. amir abdullahian laid the groundwork and then it was when, for example, obama sent a letter to haj qasim. it was written that this is the role of the so-called hamas sazeh people , this is the role of people who think high, this is their role, you know.

it had a very positive aspect with the former foreign ministers, that is, during this period, with these actions and the relationship that mr. amir abdullahian established with the former foreign ministers , it was as if the foreign policy was being carried out completely nationally and extra-criminally. sometimes it was not convenient, but he attended these meetings. sometimes the office was held in mr. velayati's own office . and mr. it should be said that amir abdullahiyan is very much at the same time, he would sit in a corner of the meeting, then he would very honestly outline what he was following in the diplosi square, stating that now these two issues are the serious issues of our work, the latest situation is this, the views are this, for example, suppose that and

other issues that were previously he used to bring up these things , and then we felt that the way he expressed them with love and fascination and with complete humility, we used all the phosphorus in our brains to come up with an idea, a suggestion, an article . it is very valuable to help the device. a minister has a position in the country somewhere. then understand the value of people that being in this position before him and the mentality that they have prepared can provide him with the solution of the country's problem . you become the wisdom of others, and he really, in these meetings, in any case, everyone who had a situation

, had an opinion, he would raise it, and this is the work of the diplomatic system. at that time, we all put our commonalities on the table, not our differences, nor our differences of opinion based on commonalities. we were saying that we should synergize. thank you very much. i also have two more questions at the end, i have an aspect that may have been lost from our minds for a long time, and maybe this will become a legacy. mr. mr. raisi and amir abdollahian know that at one time there was an interpretation called the shadow of war or the removal of the shadow of war from the country. as a matter of fact, an election was being sold to the people in these 3 months, we never heard mr. raisi or amir abdullahian talk about the shadow of war , but in practice, it happened that even in the most important moments, no one was concerned that the country

would be in the throes of war. even the honest operation we did in response to the terror zionists in damascus. the israelis, who have been threatening for years and decades, we have plans to attack iran, we have plans to destroy nuclear facilities, and the americans, who have been sending messages in front of the cameras for months and months , are not looking for war with iran, without talking about the shadow. war , how did mr. raisi and amir abdollahian achieve such a thing for the country? they are american officials . they themselves say that we don't want to fight . the first time was in 1976, and they claimed that if we didn't come, there would be a war, and then at another point, which i don't want to tell the dates now, because not to mention specific parties, this

was repeated again. once the supreme leader responded to these calls. what keeps war away from this country is the enemy's fear of going to war with iran, and this is a lie. this is a false claim that we are in the grip of war . that they can have a war against us if their political attacks don't work, their propaganda doesn't work, their sanctions don't work, but when you say that we were on the verge of war, the shadow of war had come, you have to show it, you have to prove your claim

when mr. george bush attacked afghanistan. he said that we attacked afghanistan for two purposes, one is to eliminate terrorism, two are drugs , none of them was successful. a month later, afghanistan suggested that we attack iran. every day, every week, he gave an interview, saying that the military option was on the table, repeating and repeating and repeating until leaving iraq, which is iran's second goal, leaving iraq in iraq.

supreme leader, please ask the secretary of the supreme national security council to investigate this claim. what they are doing is that there is a military option on the table , so-and-so, and so-and-so. we gathered in the secretariat of the supreme national security council, the supreme military commanders, the foreign ministers of the country, and we discussed this issue so that we can answer the question. the first question. can america actually have this power? does he want to attack iran or not? now, i will not explain those negotiations in too much detail, and the answer was that yes, the americans can, without using the persian gulf, even from

in fact, make some moves to trouble the iranians in the mediterranean. the second question was , does he do this? no, it means whether it will attack iran or not, especially with regard to the answer to the first question, yes, the answer to the first question, in general , our conclusion was that the americans, despite the fact that they have the power, they can attack, but because they do not know what will happen next, and therefore this not doing the attack, but it had a supplement. it was because the americans don't know what's going on behind the curtain that we show the americans a small show. let's hit and this was conveyed to the americans in the form of a message that if you

want to make a mistake and have the smallest attack and aggression against iran, this is a corner of the curtain that will happen , mr. george bush. he left sefid without succeeding in the smallest attack on iran since we passed that stage. we actually had the glory of the mujahideen efforts of martyr hassan tehrani moghadam. in ainul ahsan , this should be seen and said that from then on almost in my opinion, closing this case

and abandoning it. let's assume that we have found some signs that the americans want to attack us. let's come and say it. let's suffocate. one day , the secretary of the supreme national security council of russia came to iran and said that at the same time, we knew that the americans wanted to attack iran. he also had a meeting with the secretary of our supreme security council, dr. larijani . we, the americans, are certain they are attacking mr. meiri, who was once our ambassador in france, then he was in geneva. they

had some communication with the french authorities. the french system informed through them that this attack is certain. they even said, for example, that they are going to attack here. we gave it, the result of which was the meeting that i i told you that this did not happen and it was decided to give them a few days of their abilities. yes , everything was resolved behind the scenes . there was no external appearance for the people. we were able to show this ship that in

the conflict between the oppressors and our oppressors , we can move the safe and bloodiest ship of the islamic republic today with high glory and majesty, in fact, in the most peaceful ocean of the world. today, the position of the islamic republic is a real position, a position. which the world has believed israel since the balfour declaration of ilyamen haza for more than 100 years. it has been a few hundred years , his whole wish was to become a vassal country in the region, his whole wish was to become a superior power in the region, to dominate in the region, because this domination was the domination of western civilization, because it was created by israel. which was the symbol of the west, the symbol of the liberal democracy of the west , in terms of the system, in terms of government, in terms of democracy, in terms of scientific findings, etc., and

so on, they wanted this to be a small west in the heart of the islamic world to tempt others , what kind of day is israel today? what is now is 180 degrees different from what they dreamed of. since 1917, this israel has tried for 30 years to recognize itself in the world. and accept his government and it was approved in the united nations. these 30 years were accompanied by palestinians trying to kill palestinians and buy their lands. 1948 israel was formed. 30 years long drew their attempt was to stabilize israel . with the occurrence of the islamic revolution in 1979, that is 30 years later. an earthquake occurred in the region and

today israel has no place in any of the nations of the region . trump forced the governments to normalize with israel and some of them left their embassies and opened their homes. what did al-aqsa storm do to all these equations? we are facing a new world, it is demanding a new world order , and today the supreme leader of our revolution is giving this message that iran and iran's diplomacy must be for this new order. because the old order has failed they are saying that they have failed. mr. macron gathered his delegation and said in the meeting of ambassadors that we have reached the end of the line, we can no longer rule the world in western civilization, this space was there, sorry, these foreign ministers talk a lot, i am sure we used those questions. when we wanted

to ask you, we brought it up and it was all covered. thank you for your time. and surely their way is alive. mr. amir abdullahian was not the initiator of the resistance. it was a continuation of the resistance. imam rahel was the initiator of the resistance. and khalaf saleh, he is the supreme leader who is in command and does a lot smart and accurate... and the path of amir abdullahian

will continue, god willing, his friends, his colleagues, his comrades, god willing, thank you very much, thank you very much. i have a problem with the lesson planning consultation, this is it, but i don't have a good guide. this is gilana publications and we have made this problem easy for you. to get 60% of these resources completely free

, send the number 5 to the system 30485 right now. now 60% of publishing sources. officials of the ambassadors present in the countries. a european by attending the embassy of the islamic republic of iran in these countries to the martyred president and his companions they paid their respects. ambassadors and diplomats living in london expressed their sympathy by attending the embassy of our country and signing the memorial book of the martyred president