the president must be elected from religious and political leaders who have the following characteristics: iranian origin , a subject of iran, a resourceful manager with a good record, trustworthiness and piety, a believer in the foundations of the islamic republic of iran, the official religion of the country, these are the things that are included in the constitution. are these small for each of these? well, in the new law , just as it was mentioned, some of these cases have actually become a little clearer, for example, when we say a politician, it means that he must at least have a record of representing the parliament, of course, he has been told something , but in other cases, let's assume that he is a manager. being resourceful or for example, has a good record, for example, have these turned into indicators that are not a matter of taste

, especially as you mentioned now, secret voting , this has its advantages and may also have drawbacks. that people do not agree with a political trend for any reason or disagree with a person in terms of his stances and political tendencies. without actually having any of these reasons , let them see the conditions mentioned in article 15. objectively, this can be verified with a certificate, like this , for example, having citizenship requires a certificate . yes, some of these are qualitative conditions. this

needs to be investigated and analyzed. well, as i said in my petition at the beginning, in the general policies of the elections, one of the clauses mentioned that the guardian council should announce, define and announce the standards and criteria of a political, religious, and resourceful manager. the guardian council did this in several stages in 1996 and in 1400, and thanks to your presence, who came now in 1992 for a reason of its own, to make these things clearer, similar to a regulation for in fact, after the policies of 1995 were announced, the guardian council itself

defined these four titles, the political leader, the religious leader, and pointed out some indicators and criteria, which turned into a resolution based on those policies there. for some of these quality issues, like being a manager , it became a high-level indicator, as it was mentioned just now , that, for example, how many years of experience in management , having executive work, this was one of the indicators of management. management or some other conditions , indicators such as, for example, the age limit for determining the age or education degree, these are indicators that are considered by the guardian council to be ways. there are ways. which

can show us that someone can present himself in these ways, show that he has those titles, that is, when someone, for example , suppose that he has been in the ministry for a period of at least 4 years and 5 years of executive responsibility. this person is showing us a certain sign that i can have that condition. i think this is the initial condition of the work that was done by the guardian council based on the policies and it was implemented in 1400 , but there were some problems in the registration, because it was the first time. it was implemented now in this course with more accuracy , these conditions became the initial conditions of registration, that is, we first actually audit some people. those who don't have these basic conditions, it

can almost be said that they can't achieve those titles, for example, assume that they have at least 4 years. there was no responsibility, this cannot be managed at the presidential level. now, these objective conditions have increased according to this resolution , i.e. the issue of citizenship, age, education, work records, and a series of obstacles such as convictions, these become objective when registering documents. present these did

it happened that there are a number of objective conditions with this registration. and there is a part that is actually more qualitative, these titles come to the guardian council and are examined and analyzed according to the documents and conditions , so now we actually have these two categories of conditions, we have the conditions for both of them the category of conditions will be addressed at the beginning of the registration for the registration of applicants, after the registration is done, the quality check stage. two people who both have bad background in the ministry and do not have the initial conditions, which according to you is not quality. apparently, from now on

, they will be discussed about whether they had a good experience during the ministry period, for example , whether they had good management during the ministry of home affairs or other things. yes , see what we said. if someone has, for example, 4 years of ministry experience, it necessarily means this. no, this is the minimum condition for registration. yes, it is a condition for registration, but when we say that you are finally saying that you are a politician, well, another politician. . no, he cannot enter this field at all. someone who has this condition can enter this review . that is, now if someone has a history of serving in a home ministry, for example, he can register and expose himself to scrutiny, but if

someone has been in a home ministry for 4 years , he is not necessarily a religious politician. are you paying attention? yes. now other than. among these, we have other indicators , that is, the resourceful manager, maybe someone has been in the ministry for 4 years, but that resourcefulness is not verified, the issue of trustworthiness and other issues, there are different conditions. that volume of registration while this is a sign of having it, the conditions can also be there, but there is not necessarily a direct relationship between the 4 years of experience that we are presenting and those titles such as political and religious man that must be confirmed. but it helps a lot in registration and

does it have the ability to be a little bit more, maybe in the next steps, now, for example, at this stage of feeling. we said that it is possible to make some reforms in some parts of this resolution to be more effective . yes, this is the case. what is being talked about in the virtual space is that there is a candidate in this period in two consecutive terms, as is the case even now. then he is disqualified in the next round, he is confirmed, and another candidate who was approved in this period was disqualified . this is about the second one, for example, one person was approved and was rejected in the next round. you may say

that something happened in these 4 years, he did something. or we received some information from him, but what can be said about the first one, that someone came and was rejected, but 4 years later you came to the conclusion that it was approved . well, for example, we are also in the elections. now, the parliament has fewer approvals than the presidency, but it happens , but in the parliament, the volume is larger, this happens more often , not the same as the presidency. the verdict of conviction, which was said in the first period of this verdict, as per the law. conviction is an obstacle, maybe now, even in some of the laws, yes, in some of

the laws, for example, the conviction is not definitive, that is, the preliminary conviction is also an obstacle, then you, well, at that stage, since there is this conviction, you must act according to the law, right? you can qualify, but maybe a year later, 6 months later, 4 years later, the next investigations have been done, now the opinion is gone. or the trial was resumed in the higher stages, this was resolved, he was convicted of it, and now mosadegh is completely clear to me that, well, in the next period, someone brought this, or, for example, in election crimes , someone came and said that you committed an election crime in a process that was according to the law it has been an obstacle, for example, the allegation of election fraud in elections like these. in the next round, when the ruling came, it was clear

that these things could happen in other areas, for example, there was a report that that report was a hindrance, and then they announced that the report was not correct, for example , they acted according to it for a period of time, and then the issue was completely rejected , so it changed, so this is also possible, but compared to the other example you mentioned, this is less. in the case where someone was approved , the reason for the disapproval was found later, but these are the cases that happened here, and the reason may not be what you said, but simply the recognition of the current members of the guardian council compared to the former members, compared to the current quality of those people, when that someone has a history, after all, there is a rule a legal jurist is a person who has already

been dealt with in a court, for example, there is a document for him, it is assumed that those documents were dealt with, he was taken into account and a decision was issued based on that, so he himself is a criterion, he is a source that cannot be easily lost. you mean, you are only paying attention to the fact that now, for example, the judge of the court has been changed, so we cannot say, sir, that the verdict you issued is invalid. if we have a history , each one of us, and in the same way as i said, at least 7 people, for example, voting for confirmation or a number of people coming not to confirm this, that history is a reason in itself. the fact that it will definitely be taken into account in the next period , it is definitely true that, for example, we say that in our presidency, every day. whether a request comes, whether it has a history of approval , whether it has a history of non-approval, or

no history at all, it is the first time it comes, we are obliged to deal with the case, but if someone has a history, that history will definitely be taken into account , so we have to see what the reason is. after all , that history has been considered and a vote has been taken in the same way that this is finally in the shura . let it be checked, i said, they may check and see. well , in that period, according to the rules, they paid attention to that reason , then it turned out that in this period , that reason was not the correct reason. the authority that sent the reason says that it was not correct. it should be so fluid that i can say that doing this before now has nothing to do with me now , surely that reward. one of the essentials is that if someone has a record, it should be checked, and another question is the

guardian council's qualifications for this review. it checks separately and finally takes a vote and a result is known or it is related to issues like that. who cares about these people and volunteers. now, with any look, it might be expedient for the country. whether that expediency is right or wrong, we have nothing to do with it at all, but whether these issues are paid attention to or not, you come and check one by one from number 1 to, for example, 80, and you vote regardless of what comes out in the end, yes, that's it. this means that according to the law, we do not have any duties and responsibilities and it is optional

we don't want, for example, to imagine something other than the person himself. let's have another idea of ​​the sum, let's see what the sum is, for example, and this type of expediency or in general expediency in front of the law other than the expediency that the law itself has, it is not one of our duties to want to combine and arrange it, and therefore you you see, for example, in a period, a combination of the result and the outcome of the work is obtained, which some may say, sir, for example, let's assume now in this period. for example, a spectrum was less interesting for a period, they say no, now, for example , many of the spectrums are of interest to us, some tools we have a tool that we can't check the number of people who come to register . the number of people who come to register

is the number that we check. according to the law, every person should stand, for example, when we say. political, religious , this supervisor is different, the manager is resourceful, he is different, we don't have a title that, sir, for example, now do an audit in the group and see how it goes in the group , so we check each and every person. we check if the portfolio is comprehensive, we must assume that the result will be a limited portfolio for example, you can assume that we, who are not involved in the registration process, and those who registered, for example , assume that their format is related to one, for example, the factions of one group. the different tastes

of the middle opener, we must assume that the result is a function of this, for example, a more diverse combination. it may be found , but not us, we have no involvement in that combination. what similar structures do we have in other countries to qualify candidates, for example the presidency . there may be a formal structure it should be an institution and a process in a way that, in short, a country prevents the entry of those who may harm that structure, that government, and that political and ideological ideals, etc. , these are very diverse in countries, of course, there is an unofficial structure. in some countries

, especially now, like the presidency, well , these people who reach this level, this is the reason that they have to enter the so-called unofficial structure, that is, non-ruling parties, and grow within this structure and express themselves from it. the way to actually enter this scene, well, many of these audits it is done there, that is, people who have a history there are known and go through the steps , so you see in some countries, for example, there are two parties, there are three parties , each of them has a representative who actually has that candidate it is included in the official structures and it is also diverse . some structures are concentrated in the judiciary, which is responsible for this task. it is a part of

the judiciary in some places. it is possible that the institution known as the constitutional court can do this. the structures are a part of the executive branch a part of the ministry of music conducts the audit. some of the conditions are also common, for example, let's assume that the same obstacles that i mentioned, such as convictions, some of these crimes , are among the obstacles to participating in these important competitions in most countries. now, in some places , he also does other things, such as assuming that someone wants to enter, in this scene , he must be approved by a number of people in the tower. there are many forms, but in any case, especially for these

important positions, audits are conducted in different ways, and finally the people who enter this scene are loyal to that system and values. system to be considered in general policies. the election that was approved and approved by the leader of the revolution and his order was issued by himself , two words are mentioned in the functioning of the guardian council , one is that the guardian council acts in a documented manner and second is that it is accountable, what did you do and what will you do to realize these two policies? yes in the elections, whether it is the parliament or the presidency, now it is the same with the experts, of course, there the qualification check should be done with our respected jurists

, and our check is done in a documented way , that is, now everyone who enters in any of this so-called election that i mentioned has a specific file, these files contain different information, which are actually documents of judgment, evaluation and review, and in different cases , according to the type of election and the law that governs that election, these documents are used. it is also used to check the qualifications of the members of the guardian council or a pardon is possible. for example , as i mentioned, the central board of elections and election supervision, and another part that

is used is where there is a possibility of protest and request. with these documents in in fact, you should be accountable and provide the reason for that decision and evaluation. the spokesman of the guardian council announced during the qualification process that all political spectrums will have candidates. this has happened to your opinion. of course, now this is the definition of all spectrums. if you consider the main spectrums, i think that this result from examination of the resulting qualification. it actually includes a significant part . yes, i think that now everyone interprets it because these spectrums are very diverse, but

it seems to me that the six people who were elected can represent many parts of the society and now to next, what are your plans to hold the election properly and... your work is not finished. from now on, some responsibilities have been placed on the shoulders of the guardian council for the safe conduct of the election. yes , we have about 3 minutes. in fact, all the steps are supervised by the guardian council as long as it is called the election. we enter the advertising stage. now, probably from tomorrow, because we announced earlier, my ads will be announced a day earlier

, we have the ads. they are interfering, there is the advertising commission, it interferes, and the guardian council oversees the elections there. because it supervises , it gives recommendations, it pays attention, it may give a warning somewhere, god forbid, if someone violates the law clearly, it should be clear that there is a possibility that the guardian council will come in and try to deal with him. there are some violations, too. in the introduced law, it is a crime that the judiciary can prove it, we may announce it or someone else may announce it after the stage . our advertisements will become one mode we have a situation, after that we have the election, the day of the election is also very important. our supervisors

are present there , they are also monitoring the branches outside the branches at different levels, so that, god willing, the work will be carried out accurately . if the second is drawn, next week the elections will be held in the second stage, the same method of monitoring. it will be applied as long as we confirm the accuracy of the election . there is a law on how to spend money, what is considered a violation, what is considered to be a vote purchase , what is stated in the law, where did it come from, yes, now it is

being monitored by the guardian council in cases of what is stated in the law. they should be done. thank you very much, mr. d. thank you very much for accepting our invitation and at this stage, when there are too many questions from the guardian council, you appeared on the program on the first page and answered these questions . your questions have been given in this program.

swear shoes, the quality is in sync with similar foreign products

, the double-layer textured upper is very resistant and flexible , the pu sole is light and comfortable, suitable for long walks, sports and daily activities, the price is with a discount , direct purchase from the manufacturer, only 399 thousand tomans for the order of one send sms to 165 70. hello, this is girnas publications , national exam exams, possible questions, 160 116, tips, tests, and general techniques. only and only in the book , you heard it exactly right. nestrasist, the new star in the sky of the country, a different work from gilna publications. right now, 60 % of the sources of the publications take gilna as a gift sending number 5 of gilna publications.

5 o'clock: a meeting of the government's economic coordination headquarters was held to help the stock exchange industry's profitability with four resolutions. in this meeting, it was decided that the directive on the price of refined products of the ministry of petroleum should be quickly revised and communicated. the resolution necessary to prevent the withdrawal of automobile companies from the stock market must be approved by the high council of economic coordination. central bank about reducing interest rates