[000:00:00;00] thank you very much , in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful. dear viewers, hello, dear compatriots . hello, good evening. welcome to the special news talk tonight, on the third night of the second stage of the special news talk on the elections. in the first six nights, we are with the candidates for the presidential election. the republic of the 14th term was discussed about the seventh program, and at this stage tonight and the previous nights we were at your service and the coming nights, the respected candidates

will answer the people's questions in a 45-minute interval . through the khabar network, the writer of the khabar network received and reached us through the sms system and the knowledge of the messengers of khabarnagaran javan club . from 8 am to 2 pm, more than 10,000 questions have been sent to us in various social fields, salaries of retired teachers and other such matters. god willing , i will ask your questions to our guest tonight, mr. saeed jalili, who is a candidate for the 14th term of the presidential election.

join us with tonight's special news talk. greetings to you, dear viewers, as i said , tonight on the third night of the second stage of wijeh conversation election news mr. dr. saeed jalili, the candidate for the 14th term of the presidential election , is with us mr. doctor, hello, good night, welcome , hello, hello, i am at your service and all our dear people , how are you? anyway, the field of elections is the field where people should be enriched for what we believe, what we planned, what we want to do, as we get closer to the election day, the amount of advertising programs will increase. it is normal . after all, more efforts should be made to make those views that we have, anyway, if we are 10 or 11 years old

issue. we worked, this is a good opportunity to explain this to the people. people are now on the verge of a big choice. the more insightful this choice is, the more informed people are about their own future . today, the conference of women and girls how was it, your excellency, we came there, it was good, it was a very good meeting, anyway, we are about half of the crowd. we are women, we have a discussion that one world is an opportunity, one iran is a leap, if we believe this, then a major part of our opportunities are women or a major part of these opportunities. its carriers must be women, and if we want to make a leap in iran , we must pay attention to this great opportunity and have a plan for it, so that it can have the most presence, in

addition to your own plan. can you say a word or two , what was the most important demand of women today from your excellency, by the way, this was the discussion that their role should be seen, we have a discussion in the continuation of our slogan that every iranian has a glorious role, well half of the population of iran are women, they should have that glorious role. let it be defined, anyway, women have different titles, sometimes they are wives, sometimes they are mothers sometimes they are daughters, sometimes they are sisters, sometimes they are important social roles. that in some places, women are the guardians of the khans, in some times, well, these things should be seen , these things should be paid attention to, so that this great capacity can be mobilized. the religious thought is that it happens to place the woman in her place

, the capacity that should be moved in the society. when it can be done in the best way , the family, which is the center of the family, can be a safe environment, and this so-called environment. calm down provide in such a way that the wife's children and the like can play an effective role in the society . very well, let's have a short media gap . mr. jalili, we will be back, god willing, people will ask questions. stay with us. saeed jalili, born in 134, mashhad, phd in islamic studies the trend of political science records of the secretary of the supreme national security council. representative of the leader of the revolution in the supreme national security council, member of the expediency council, member of the

foreign relations strategic council. as i mentioned in the first part of the program, in tonight's special news interview, that is, in the second stage of the special interview, you will ask questions from the candidates. respectfully, we are asking, and what we received from this morning until 2:00 p.m. , i will ask your questions to mr. jalili, mr. doctor , based on my duty that trust must be respected, i am reading the same text. what is the relationship with the words of the consultant of one of the candidates about you and the government of shahid raisi? now

, in my opinion, this discussion is probably good from the point of view that this question, my dear viewer, is asking that there are two views anyway, and by the way, because we are at the threshold there are elections and people must choose. in this way , the good topics are that the views are a little clearer it makes it more transparent. one look was this . when the embargo on the sale of iran's oil was formed, some people said that we cannot sell oil anymore. after that , the real effort, whether you remember it or not , was that they said that our oil sales would decrease once and for all. at the same time, we said no, this oil can be sold, and it is not like he is an active enemy of mayesha , whatever he wants to do, he can do it. we have power, we can, we have ways , we have young people, we have work, we can do the work, well, a very good and valuable effort was made in the government of mr. raisi, and by the way, that plan the enemy played an equal role, i mean, you saw today

, just two weeks ago, the us foreign minister was officially asked in the senate, so iran is selling 2 million barrels of oil, and he said, yes, they can impose sanctions and bypass them, they are doing this, so this is a day. the approach is as follows. there are 2 functions here , people can judge. now that this work is being done, i heard that it was said that yes, no, this is because america did not want it. well, if america itself did not want it, first of all, america should not say that because iran did not want it , iran was able to get oil. this one is for sale in my opinion, self-deprecation is not believing in one's own abilities, which the enemy has admitted, and the other side says yes. he said that some time ago, that is , after mr. raisi's government came and this move was successful, the spokesperson of the us ministry of foreign affairs came and officially said that the strategy of maximum pressure, one of

which was the embargo on the sale of iranian oil, said that the party has failed miserably. now you are something else. now there are many cases. i mean, this is what the elections are all about . the clearer this debate becomes, the more people will see different approaches , now everyone will finally express their opinion. people who judge, for example, look at another example, which is the confession of the us foreign minister himself. some time ago, the spokesman of the us foreign ministry, who says that there was a huge failure, says no, this is not what biden wanted. you can see in the us national security strategy document that, for example, he said that russia is a threat. urgently and strategically, on this basis, he told me that , for example, his oil. if sanctioned, russia is still selling its oil, which means that the countries that are hostile to someone who is not passive, now we are also talking about russia. no, biden did not want to, he is selling his oil.

not believing in yourself is selfishness, or you think that the other party is active, not that, for example , if he wants so-and-so, one of those points that is very important for our people to know in this field is that this is what they should do when he comes. it was your time for 9 months , so why didn't you sell your oil when you were there? if biden didn't want to, it was you for 9 months. why didn't you reach the level that it is now ? to get a correct analysis, when you can have a correct analysis, first describe the scene correctly let's be realistic, look at the facts carefully , and not argue based on a series of romantic views, for example, saying no, for example, we see this in america, this is the way it is , and it actually showed one point, because it is about our dear martyred government. beloved by the people, mr. president. it was brought up that yes, i heard these 3 years, well

, it was a boldness that yes, these 3 years, people did not use a good interpretation, no, people today are judging the same period as you said, with this path, we can achieve these successes. let's take, for example, a promise was made in 1992 for example, when i come, both the economy and santoje are spinning. what happened to santoje, which went from 19,000 to 3,000? sanctions that were 800 have increased to 1500. even these gentlemen themselves were sanctioned at the same time. i want to say that it is important that people can make a decision. they say that these last 3 years have been a disaster. compare whether these 3 years were a disaster or not when you look, you will see that the growth

of the country was zero, the negative years were average, 7 % of this country, then in these 3 years , how much did the martyr raisi rushdo increase, how many percentages did people compare this, the same oil index that they say that biden didn't want you to see it, so to speak, it has reached the point where they are saying 2 million . you mentioned that since it is the time of the election, the facts should be clear to the people . they raise about the period of responsibility

your excellency, you were in charge of the negotiations. well , thank you. i don't want to go into too much detail . what do you think is their purpose in questioning those kinds of negotiations? now, anyway, everyone has a point of view. the point is that negotiation is a tool, and it must be used. yes, but the main goal is to defend the rights of the iranian people , to protect the interests of the people, and to retreat into non-existence. retreat in the path of the country's progress. you must keep these . for example, they say no, the negotiation is only for us to reach an agreement, if that agreement does not provide the interests of the nation, if that agreement it makes you, for example , collect the facilities that you have, the capacities that you have, the opportunities that your nuclear scientists created and you want to ignore, and the things that happened , this is definitely not the defense of the nation's rights, but negotiation is a means to defend the nation's rights. this is what

i have said many times that the world should not be limited to a few countries , the world is big, there are 200 countries in the world , there are many opportunities, this is our slogan, one world, one opportunity, this is our foreign policy, especially at this point in time. we have so many opportunities in the world that by the way, if our economy wants to have a leap, god willing, as we say, an iran needs a leap, what is it to have the markets of the world and today it seems. we have very good conditions for this leap of iran. similar to this question that i want to ask , there are also public questions about which i will clearly and explicitly ask you. i think that in the path we took in defending the rights of the nation, we did a few important things. have a doon santoge. when we handed over the work to the next government

, we had 19,000 cents, that is, we took over in a situation where everything was suspended, it had been closed, and even that party had told them that now you have to destroy it, and now they have reached a situation where 19,000 santiogend, our nuclear rights, the things that were raised, that we had a million so-called patients for whom medicine had to be prepared, and that medicine was required to have 20% of fuel. we asked them to give when we ensured that they did not give, and this is a power. see some of them the so-called issues are a sign, if he could break your embankment, if, for example, you are right , he will take you. at that time, i always said that the defense of nuclear rights is not only the defense of nuclear rights, it is the defense of all the rights of the country, because if, for example, the enemy comes take khorramshahr, then see, well, there is no resistance , then he will come, hoyzerm will take it, then see, he will not come to all your cities, as we saw later , when these people leave, even

abandoning all these achievements, then saying, "okay, we will collect this santovija, these materials." we take out what was produced and put it here. what did he do? it was totally out of agreement later. what happened to its economic effects, i once said that the dollar became 3 tomans, 30 tomans , 10 times, the pressure of sanctions increased , the sanctions were supposed to be lifted, the sanctions increased, so this is very important, as you and i saw, it was not over yet, then now we enter into the missile discussion. well , now let's talk about your missile. my argument is that it is important that you can defend the rights of your nation and the interests of the nation, so why do they say that you should not change the history? what are they talking about? i am exactly what we are saying in the elections. this history should be seen beautifully at what point were the rights of the nation protected? at what point were serious retreats from the rights of the nation? at what point were these rights of the nation ignored? after that , what did we have to

do with it? they implemented the agreement that we all objected to at that time even more than what was necessary. 15. 10 times, the agency announced what the result was, the result was that he did not fulfill one of his commitments, he left at all, then they say , well, it was trump who came, which one should you return , for 9 months that your time preserved all of them again. and rather, he added more sanctions. my argument is that the advanced path of the country should not be burdened by one or two powers that have the biggest differences with you. by the way, there are 200 countries in the world

that have a lot in common with you. exporting the technical services of the young engineers of this country, which both creates employment and shows the capabilities of the nation, and strengthens friendship with the countries close to us in the 17th and 12th governments, his excellency's presence in the supreme national security council continued this view if you raised these criticisms about this performance, we would accept them the discourse that we have under the title of shadow government, which i have said many times, is that any government that comes into office that is elected by the people must be respected and you must help that government. one of these help is that if something goes wrong, it please help me to correct it

. i remember that in 6 meetings of the supreme national security council at that time , we had taken a detailed report about this jcpoa agreement, and he explained all these things. we were reading word by word, sentence by sentence, and we were saying, sir, what you are saying, for example, the sanctions will be canceled on the first day, it is not you, some of these sanctions are it will last for 8 years. some people will stay until this point. the same sanctions that i am saying will last for 8 years . it was this october last year. after 8 years, you saw that one day before that date, the union of those european countries announced that no, we will still maintain the sanctions. we used to say that these things are not written on this, we really had a compassionate intention , we wanted to correct them, but they said no , that's it and it's fine, and the things that were said are not our duty, that if we see something is wrong, help us. let's correct it, don't say now, let it go, then let's say, for example, this is our mistake. we discussed the time in detail both in the supreme national security council and later in the parliament when you invited them. well

, unfortunately, i remember some of these meetings , some of them were very angry and shouted. tell me what this is, answer me, tell me, no, this is something else, what you wrote in this text is different from what you tell the people, very well, the shadow government you mentioned, you mean an organization and combination exactly like the government board we have. you formed people in the same positions and made them responsible that the evaluation of the activities and actions of those institutions should be carried out by the ministry of housing, not by the shadow government . we were talking with respected professors of the university and he also said that every person according to his talent and ability should

follow the developments of the country shadow by shadow. if it is good, he should help strengthen it. somewhere he sees something incomplete and helps to complete it, so i am on the same basis i have said many times that every university should be a shadow government . if i am in the government, i will be in charge of the government. follow the completion, if it is good, confirm it, if there is a mistake, help, be influenced, if there is an incomplete place , help it to be completed, this is what we started , this is how we told everyone who is ready in a subject, have a capability, have a specialty, so let's discuss. let's check the issue , check it yourself, let's work together , summarize, follow this type of approach of the governments it is very important that during the time of the previous government, which was our rival government, we used to present these things, but it

was not paid attention to. the term mesrat welcomed this, the method gave orders, he followed up, he said, sir, these discussions are important points, it is good to implement them, that is , he considered this an opportunity for himself, not to say, for example , now this is something, and these are asking what is your practical plan for compliance. banks from the instructions of the bank is a solution to make it easy to receive do you have facilities for people? you see, one of the very good opportunities that exist now is the beginning of the 14th government with the start of the new law of the central bank. well , you see, our law of the central bank has been in need of reform for many years, and it has actually been stopped for several decades. fortunately, this law was last year. the new law came to an end and it has many better strengths than before, and what is a very strong law for? so that now the central bank

can fulfill its role in supervising the banks . therefore, it is one of the things that i hope for and the thing that we follow first this is that the central bank must implement this law seriously , that is, it should not follow the model where banks can do whatever they want, see how many things banks are doing now that are very serious, for example , creating money, which they are doing, especially private banks. ok. creating money from people's pockets, if this is to be done, first of all, it must be regulated, and secondly , if it is done even according to the rules, it must be for the benefit of the people, it is not like now that the bank will say no, i myself create money from people's pockets, but anyway i would like to do it myself. one of the main arguments is that the second point of this argument is that now the same facilities that banks give, well , unfortunately, we may discriminate a lot. 50% of our people now, according to the available statistics, have never received corrections. i remember one of

our brothers, who is now your colleague in sada and vesima, once wanted to get a loan for his marriage in the 1980s and 1981s. from the end, he had gone several times , it was 200,000 tomans. at that time, he said, "i couldn't get it, and what is more bitter for me is that, for example , some of our friends who are in the bank, for example , told us why it is so important that you do this." you should see where these organizations are located is it going in the direction of production, in the direction of people's interests, in the direction of solving problems? these are important discussions that are now being asked more than service and respect for the dignity of patients in hospitals. there is a big difference between private and public. what will you do to solve this problem? you see, this is an important discussion in the health system, we

had a serious study method, that these services that should be given to the people, this accountability in the health system is not just to tell you, sir , what was the tariff issue or what are these things in the scientific studies that are now in there is accountability of the health system. one of the serious debates is that approx for example, maybe there are nearly 100 indicators to see if this system works. amed is responsive or not, that is , for example, whether the patient's respect is maintained in the referral that can be made, whether the patient is given different options or not. for example , what is one of those indicators of a good response in the health system , for example, you even tell the patient that you have as many options as you can, now tell him the effects of each option, the economic effects. i don't know the effects of the treatment and that he can choose, now this is the detail this is not the place to discuss it, but you see, one of

the things you asked is an important issue that i believe is very important for you to be present, that if there is a serious difference between your public sector tariffs and your private sector, naturally, then you will cause the migration of your capabilities. towards the private sector, because he says, i can say how many times here, unfortunately , one of the things that happened is that, as you know , these were the same until 1982. in 1983, within two years , these definitions of the private sector multiplied at once. at the time of our brother's ministry, mr. mezikian , well, once your time is defined many times it is natural for the private sector to be compared to the public sector , and the doctor prefers to provide services there. at that time, there will be more compliments for this government job, which was one of the problems and, unfortunately, the wrong policies that were followed that year. which must

be followed, sir, i have a request from your excellency, the answers. please make it as short as possible, of course, in a way that the rights of the subject are also respected , as i know that there are more questions than i know, now each of these is a detailed discussion. more questions that you said, my questions are the questions of dear viewers. we can ask more from your excellency . please ask mr. jalili what plan you have to control the currency price despite the sanctions. see one of the discussions that exist. i said this because i brought it up in the first debate. i said that the debate has two aspects that you want to do. one of them is the debate related to the sovereignty of the rial and the internal debates that you have to surround yourself with in the circulation of money. the second is in the debate. the price of the currency itself, the so-called currency exchange within your country, you have to arrange the first thing

i said there that you must have a horizontal budget . the sources of expenses should be defined based on your priorities, so that whatever comes your way , you can put yourself in it, because today , fortunately , we have enough foreign exchange resources for almost all the main expenses that we have, not only the basic goods of the conventional expenses that the country has, but this you must correct this cycle and process, that is, if there are places in iran , stop it, which i said last night. i explained that i will not repeat that we should use it here, but you asked a question regarding sanctions one of the problems we have with the sanctions is that we are having problems with bank transactions. one of the serious discussions and plans we have, we have worked on a method and we think it is completely feasible . it can be realized in the short term. it is that we have to

form some currency exchanges with countries that are ready to do this with us. that there are specific ways , there are serious discussions, and as much as you can do these transactions through the bank, which in our opinion is possible in some areas, at least it can be done, then this so-called some of the corruption and some of the problems and some of the complications that will affect the price of bread will be reduced. one last point that i think is important in this matter is that now due to the sanctions we have to implement some processes. we have these through trustia. in these processes, we have made a detailed investigation, there are some serious problems , sometimes the long process causes it to hurt the market, this must be a method, we must have found some measures, which we have written at least a few orders, which will be announced in the first week, god willing. i am sending a message from faryab village respected candidates, ask so that the farmers

themselves can make a profit and the profit from the sale of their products goes into the pockets of dealers. first of all, what is their plan, and what are their measures to reduce the cost of fertilizer and cement and increase the costs of farmers? you see, one of the main points that we have in our programs is that you have a view on the village and the agricultural work and the products that are being done. it is that we brought this up. it is in our slogan that every so-called village is a mutation cell. we say that if the country wants to find a mutation. your village should become a mutation cell, that is, if we have 40,000 villages with more than 20 households , if each of them gets an economic jump, naturally , my country will get a jump. what is the way for this? the first issue is that