in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, ladies and gentlemen , welcome to the world today, the results of the two elections tonight, the topic of the world program today, both the global dimension of the 14th presidential election in iran and the holding of the general election on thursday in england , which brought a new prime minister to power in this country. before starting the conversation, a review of some short news. well, about the issue of the elections in england, which

actually caused the labor party to come to power in this country, i will discuss with mr. seyed mojtabi jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues, who is a guest of the jahan today program, but before the start of a we will come back to see the news package.

well, as i mentioned, mr. seyyed mojtabi jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues , is a guest of the program of the world today, and we are going to talk with him about the results of the elections in england , mr. jalalzadeh. welcome, as a first question , i would like to ask if the labor party won this election and a new prime minister took office, if we want to have a general view, what effects or changes can be made in england ? and i have the courtesy to serve you and the esteemed viewers of the jahan today program, regarding the election that took place last week or better. this happened a few days ago, and

the conservatives giving their place to the labor party can be investigated in several ways, first of all , it has the dimensions that the biggest electoral defeat of the conservatives was in the past 200 years, and they have never had such a defeat. on the other hand, the party did not lose the number of parliamentary seats. it can almost be said that kargar has been preparing himself for 14 years for such a day when he reaches the position of power. tactical differences in foreign policy and in domestic policy. we should expect that let's witness in the field of international relations from the british side, but the fact is that the conservatives , due to their poor performance in the corona pandemic , also in the management of internal issues and also increase. poverty and rising prices caused

the public opinion to reject them and vote for their long-time rival, the labor party, from different jihads and in different fields. i will try to serve you in short parts, because you went to foreign policy, we had in the news that there were demonstrations in england, after this election was held , let's see a report about how the different strata of the british people, on the first day of the labor party coming to power in this country, by insisting on the need to stop the genocide of palestinians, showed their power in front of the new government. let's see a report about this. we return to the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh. well

, we will continue the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh until the video content is ready. in your opinion, mr. jalalzadeh, the gaza issue , considering that we are witnessing these developments inside palestine, and in england , different strata of people are protesting this policy, was a thing of the past. and now it has continued and intensified . do you think we will see a change in the british government's policy towards the gaza issue or not? well , you see, the issue of palestine is an old and influential new issue in the discussion of british politics . i say old in the sense that when we look at the formation and establishment of the zionist regime, britain is one of the elements and one of the effective actors in the process of the formation and establishment of this regime. it is the same way , throughout history, when we

examine the positions of the regime, i apologize, the positions of the british parties regarding palestine and the issue of gaza now, we see that although the conservatives and the workers of the labor party are in general agreement, which means they consider themselves committed to the survival of the zionist regime, but they have differences with each other in tactics and in the superstructure, in general , if we want to start from a little before the 2000s let's start in 200 ad. well, tony , yes , he had a milder approach towards the zionists , he didn't criticize israel much. admili band is a jew herself, although she herself is a jew, she makes mild criticisms and declares her opposition to settlements. after that, when jeremy corbyn comes to power well , there is a period of challenge between the labor party and the zionists. he openly

criticizes and speaks in support of the rights of the palestinians , which causes challenges for them from 2015 to 2020. being the head of the labor party and finally mr. starmer comes to stigmatize, or better to say , he suspends him from the party under the political pretext of something and takes his place. haft oktober supports , but also raises subtle criticisms that the stoppage of urban development and also this emphasis on a cease-fire and a cease-fire and a reduction of tensions through negotiation, the minister of foreign affairs, who is now introducing a proposal during the election campaign of david lemmy, is also one of the things

he is saying is that with the help of us president biden through diplomacy he wants to do the truce, but the fact is that it doesn't make any difference in the big picture, that is, we are right at the root of the censure, that the conservatives have united themselves with tel aviv , always showing a lot of services during the post-war period, after the al-aqsa storm, i apologize. he gave the zionists military aid to legal aid in international forums also, intelligence and espionage assistance, but if we want to have a look at the future , the fact is that the labor party of the new prime minister, mr. starmer , will continue to support the survival of the zionists under the pretext of legitimate defense

of their criminal actions in the gaza strip. and will confirm it in rafah, but will still insist on several principles: preventing the expansion and ending the conflict, tension and war in gaza, now under the pretext of human rights, and also supporting the formation of two governments in the occupied territories and reducing or avoiding the discussion of zionist settlements, my understanding of this section from what you said , these two prime ministers do not differ in the strategy of supporting the zionist regime, but it is possible that the prime minister who has been elected is different in their way. router, and now we will witness that maybe now, even under the pretext of this change in the british government, the west will try to end this war. i still want to continue talking to you, but the report about the first demonstration after the election in

we will return to the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh after the labor party came to power in england and we want to see the british people's support for gaza. the first demonstration of support palestinian rights after the defeat of the previous ruling party in england, the conservative party. the new british government should listen to the fact that the people want an immediate ceasefire in gaza and are not buying new justifications about it. we don't want our money to be used to provide weapons to exterminate palestinians. the labor party has supported the zionist regime since the beginning. the gaza war, as well as the expulsion and marginalization of pro-palestinian figures from this party

, have now faced demonstrations by supporters of palestinian rights on the first day of assuming power. it is very important to show our compassion towards the palestinians. we have been saying it in the streets for months we are all human and we are all palestinians and we feel responsible for each other. but the politicians still did not understand this demand of the people. supporters of palestinian rights say demonstrations. they started 9 months ago to stop the genocide of palestinians and punish the war criminals in gaza , they will stop only with a ceasefire in this area and the realization of the rights of the palestinians. we want to convey this message that we the people are not complicit in this genocide and the change of governments cannot make us stand on the side of criminals. we continue our right path with strength, the most important issue of palestine and the gaza crisis

which was not ineffective in overthrowing the previous british government led by the conservative party, now it can challenge the new british government led by the labor party . london , i will continue the conversation with mr. seyed mojtabi jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues in the world . mr. jalalzadeh, you heard the summary of my colleague who believed that the palestinian issue and the wide impact it had on the public opinion of the world may have influenced the conservatives to lose. let the labor party win this election . what is your opinion on this matter? well, one of them there are very effective factors. when we read in the analyses, the analysts mostly try

to consider the economic debates of immigration and internal politics of england as the reason for the defeat of the conservatives and on that basis predict the victory of the labor party, but the reality is that based on field observations the gaza issue has been a very important issue in england, because on the one hand, muslims living in england of asian descent , as well as our ordinary citizens, now during mehr last month, when the al-aqsa storm took place, the events after that, a wave of anti-zionism in the world and support and subsequent it supports the rights of the oppressed palestinian people we saw that england and london were not exempted from this story and we saw pictures of it in the report. the fact is that according to field monitoring and polls , 20% of the reasons are muslim. muslims and asians of british descent

do not vote for the conservatives. the issue of gaza is the fact that intellectuals and ordinary people have become sensitive to what is happening in the occupied territories due to the media and what is a genocide and a heinous crime against the zionists, which has caused them to support the support of politicians, the government's support of israel will face huge costs in the international arena, mr jarzadeh, let's go to ukraine . on his first day of work, the new prime minister of england contacted the president of ukraine and announced his support for onur. we heard in the news that moscow expressed his disappointment that the relations between moscow and london would improve , and how much this choice is related to the issue of war. ukraine and london-moscow relations are effective, you know, the fact is that based on various parameters, we

will not see much difference and change in london-moscow relations in the future, because in the cold post-war mental atmosphere that dominates british politicians and besides those relations special and transatlantic defining russia as an international threat with the united states of america and in other words as an enemy for britain is considered to be almost the same since the beginning of the ukraine war, and it will be the same from now on. that's mean. emphasizing the condemnation of russia and accusing it of being a threat to international security , and accusing the russians of clearly violating international rights, at the same time giving weapons to the ukrainians to fan the flames of war, and the proposition that he is strongly following, and this

this has been emphasized for days and by mr. estharmer it is through dialogue, negotiation or better b'. end the war through diplomacy, but the fact is that england will go along with the sanctions that the european union or the sanctions that the west , led by the united states , will impose against russia due to the war in ukraine, and we will not see much change in this policy. paying attention to the fact that in any case , the ukraine issue is supported by several western countries, and on the other hand, usually when the prime ministers or presidents are in conflict. they are trying to close the cases. the ukraine issue has been one of those cases in the literature for a long time western political authorities are showing a desire to close his case. how much can england alone be an actor so that this case can be closed now without the responsibility of ukraine. you

said that there is no hope for moscow-london relations to improve. but can we hope that the prime minister it is the meeting of the east and the west, that is, what we are witnessing today is the support of the west, the support of the western bloc, america, france, germany, england, to ukraine, not for ukraine's victory, not for ukraine itself and reaching

the lands it has lost, but to contain russia. that build a trench and build a trench and make them stop russia's advance and at the same time lead russia to collapse economically and militarily . this is the same playground of ukraine. let's go to one of the plans that mr. starmer made on the first day kari himself went to him and

stopped the plan to deport refugees from rwanda, a plan that was carried out by different prime ministers of england. it has been mentioned since the time of mr. boris jansen, it has been mentioned until the time of this mr. rishi senak, the case is also open . why do you think the previous ones did not stop the plan to deport the asylum seekers? the power to reach has given up on this action. well, look at the issue of asylum seekers or even beyond that circle , if we make it bigger, in the analysis of the issue of extraterritorial immigrants in britain, it is a very important issue , one of the points of disagreement, one of the issues that caused brexit to be formed 8 years ago. and that was the issue of england leaving the european union. during the time when england was a member of the european union, we witnessed that it never entered the schengen area and

did not allow the europeans to travel and travel freely in their own country. it is a very important issue for english people from several different aspects we did that, well, during several terms of the prime minister, this matter is brought up until finally , in july of last year, if i am not mistaken, the transfer of asylum seekers to a third country was approved and became a law . so far, the british have spent 270 million pounds , that is, to rwanda. paying and being able to send only two asylum seekers, they also paid 3 thousand dollars and 3 thousand pounds to themselves. they have not been able to do this policy until now, why was it a wrong policy and there are several reasons why they could not do it? the issues of asylum seekers and their treatment and limiting the illegal arrival of asylum seekers to

british lands have been one of the electoral challenges of the parties during these years. but there are three main reasons that we can consider why this plan was not successful with him, and mr. starmer suspended this work as his first promise. the issue of ineffectiveness and lack of deterrence is the issue. well, this plan was proposed and approved, but we still see that the smugglers bring themselves to the british territories by boat. the next issue was the high cost. i realized that several million pounds were paid and now it is supposed to be paid in 50 million pounds packages, but there is no result, and the most important thing is to compare it with international laws. well, england is a member. there are two refugee asylum conventions of 1951, whose policies are in conflict with the rules of the conventions, and is

there an attempt to make themselves popular in the public opinion, that stopping this deportation plan can increase the popularity and favor of the public opinion. if they are effective, see that due to the increase in asylum seekers who are in england and are legally getting citizenship, i said. again, in the gaza issue, we have seen to some extent that the asian debate and the muslim debate can have a positive result on a small percentage of public opinion inside , but mostly it is an international gesture and an international rights gesture that they want to take for their own purposes and for their own principles. in the sphere of international relations, let's not forget that another opponent of pene. the asylum seekers and the granting of asylum, now those who request asylum are mr. macron , the president of france, who was the first person to

call mr. stormer, congratulate him on his victory , and even talk about this issue. the reality is that the strict british policies will become even stricter in the future , although the rwanda case will be closed . and the services that are provided in the field of health and treatment . for many years, the headline of many news that we heard from england is the discussion of the crisis of medical and treatment services in england. so, look at one of the most influential areas that caused the defeat of the conservatives and the victory of the labor party. this is the field of health. and there is public health, health and public health, health and public health is one of the areas that the people and citizens of britain are involved with, the high costs that

are depriving many of these services , there is a lack of manpower, and a lack of manpower. if there is a human being, put this together with the other parameters that i mentioned within 20 and 14 years. in the past, the conservatives were involved in the issue of price increases, now the increase in inflation, the crippling poverty that exists in the british society, this is not my talk and the current iranian data, it is a big discussion. it is brought up in the media itself , it is brought up in the english-language media itself, it is brought up in the european media itself, and criticisms are formed . the fact is that part of the people do not benefit from the british health system. being removed and this caused a fundamental challenge to form. well, starmer came and bahzakaran was strengthened, which means that this challenge and this crisis

increased. one of the points that he had in his advertising slogans and in his big slogan, he raised the issue of change, that mr i have come to change policies. well, zail, he has made promises regarding health and public health, and in the future, he must be able to establish them by amending the budget and existing issues. asia is there .

although conservatives are always in the opposition and not in power in sensitive historical periods , they have reactions, for example, in the coup discussion. 1953 1332 when mr. mossadegh's popular government falls, the conservatives are in charge and the kargerd party is very critical of their involvement in the revolution of 1971 iran 1971 . during the time of tony blair, he was one of the labor party, we saw that he had an active diplomacy and

negotiation. in the english media, he was ironically called jack tehrani because of his many trips to tehran, but the fact is that the challenge we have with england now is in two hours. when the jcpoa was concluded, the labor party was the opposition and was not involved in the work, and the conservatives did it. but he supported this. it is expected that he will try to bring back the jcpoa or the americans through diplomacy and dialogue. in general , he will help revive the jcpoa . in david cameron's foreign affairs, we witnessed that they had a historical correspondence at the same time, of course, a time that started almost a year ago with canada when they came to say the irgc. pastors to

it should be done as a terrorist group or in the list of terrorist groups. yes, put its name. well , because of the opposition of the interior minister, that is, the dispute between the interior minister and the foreign minister of the conservative government , this was not done, but the canadians did it . unfortunately , of course, there is one point, we don't have diplomatic relations with canada, but the british have diplomatic relations with us, maybe they have this consideration. in the new government, mr. yvette cooper and david lemmy, where cooper is proposed as the interior minister and lemmy as the foreign minister, both of them are out of the discussion. it is possible to declare the revolutionary guards as a terrorist and support them, of course, the reports of think tanks and think tanks that advise the government, the ministry of foreign affairs, the ministry of the country, are against this, and for the reasons

i mentioned, one of them is the diplomatic issue, which introduces a new challenge to the newly established government. i don't recommend mr. starmer, but it is possible that the politicians on the three sides of the prime ministership of the ministry of foreign affairs and the ministry of interior will come to the decision to do this, and the consequences and challenges that it will create must be in my mind at the same time as the discussion. whether the irgc is in the group list it was said from inside england that if we do this , many of the official military forces of the countries should be included in this list, and that is why this plan was canceled . i was a guest of jahan today program, this program is still going on , let's take a breather, we will be back. at the same time as the president of the united states confirmed that he will continue to participate in the

presidential race, requests for his resignation have increased. a number of financial supporters of the democratic party also joined the group of biden's opponents if biden does not withdraw from the presidential election, they will cut off their financial support from this party. but the president of the united states defended his mental and physical health and said that he will remain until the end of the american election and will win again. the canadian company govix announced that the government of niger has revoked the license to operate uranium fields in maduela in the north of the country. the lifespan of this uranium mine is estimated to be about 20 years. niger previously granted permission to operate the imouran uranium mine in the north of this country he took it back from the french company orano.