sports and daily activities, text 10065 70. in the name of god. hello. ceo. the central bank announced the first monetary agreement between iran and russia. according to mr. farzin, one of the clauses of this agreement is the connection of the russian card payment network to the iranian network, which has entered the operational stage and will be usable until the beginning of september. the first monetary agreement between iran and russia is to remove the dollar and work with our local currencies . two countries have been operationalized. this agreement

took actions and provided the necessary infrastructure, actions on our side, actions that forgive it should be done in the currency and gold exchange center with the opening of offshore rial or cross-border rial board. the connection of russia's karti mir network to iran's shatab network from the first week of september is one of the clauses of this agreement. in contrast, iranian cards can be used in atms in russia. this plan or project has three stages. the second stage is that russian cards will be usable in iran, and the third stage is that our accelerated cards and accelerated cards will also be usable in the so-called network in their store acceptors. with this exchange agreement. two countries with currencies

localization is facilitated and the risk of currency conversion costs for iranian businessmen is reduced. rizvan basfa, radio and television news agency. the architectural document of one fabric of information technology and the security operation center of the ministry of economy was unveiled. according to the minister of economy, smart provincial tax with the implementation of the law of store terminals of the national portal of business mages, publication of company financial statements and electronic payments of the treasury are among the things that the ministry of economy has implemented with the information technology roadmap. in the current and current systems of managing the economy basically without having a completely appropriate strategy in the field of technology

information and data governance and issues like this cannot be realized. in this meeting, mr. khanrouzi also mentioned the completion of customs systems by the end of this summer. my expectation is that our friends in the iranian customs should put the issue of establishing the new customs system, which has already started in some customs, on the agenda with a much faster speed, and we will be able to install 140% of the new customs system this summer, god willing. to have the researchers of our country produced a laser vibration meter that is used in various medical and research industries. this machine makes knowledge basis is a tool for visual, non-contact optical measurement of the range, frequency and speed of vibrating objects, which compares to similar products of measurement accuracy. it

is higher and has the ability to simultaneously measure and send frequency, displacement and speed. this device is used to monitor the health of mechanisms and bridges, rails and equipment, check the stress of limbs and joints, detect hand tremors and measure the quality of roads. the next part of the news, at 3 o'clock.

bismillah. rahman al-rahim ladies and gentlemen, hello , welcome to the world today, the result of the two elections tonight, the topic of the world program today, both the global dimension of the 14th presidential election in iran and holding general elections on thursday in england , which brought a new prime minister to power in this country. before starting the conversation, a review of some short news. well, about the issue of elections in england, which actually caused the labor party to come to power in this country, i will discuss with mr. seyed mojtabi

jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues, who is a guest of the world today program, but we will return before the start of a news package. well, as i mentioned, mr. seyyed mojtabi jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues

, is a guest of the program tonight, jahan today, and we are going to talk with him about the results of the elections in england. welcome to jalalzadeh. the title of the first question is that if the labor party won this election and a new prime minister came to power, if we want to have a general view, what effects or changes can occur in england? yes, in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful . i offer my greetings and courtesy to you and the respected viewers of the jahan today program. in fact, the elections that took place last week, or rather, a few days ago, and... the conservatives giving their place to the labor party can be examined in several ways. first, it has the dimensions that it is the biggest electoral defeat of conservatives it has been in the past 200 years and they

have never had such a failure and never lost so many parliamentary seats . who had been preparing himself for 14 years for such a day when he comes to power , we should expect to see tactical differences in foreign policy and in domestic policy from the british side in the field of international relations, but the fact is that the conservatives due to their poor performance in the corona pandemic, as well as in the management of internal issues and also the increase in poverty price increase caused the public opinion to reject them and vote for their long-time rival, the labor party, from different jihads and in different fields. let me give you a few short parts

. because you went to foreign policy, we had in the news that there were demonstrations in england after this election. a report has been held to see how different sections of the british people on the first day of the labor party coming to power in this country by insisting on the need to stop the genocide of the palestinians. they exposed themselves to the new government . let's see a report about this . we will return to the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh. well , we will continue the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh until the video content is ready. in your opinion, mr. jalalzadeh, the gaza issue, considering that we are witnessing these developments inside palestine, and in england, different groups are protesting this policy, was a thing of the past. and now

it has continued and intensified . do you think there will be a change in the british government's policy towards the gaza issue? the palestinian issue is an old and influential new issue in the discussion of british policy. this is the old way of saying that when we are in terms of form, what does it mean that they consider themselves committed to the survival of the zionist regime, but

they have differences with each other in tactics and in the superstructure, in general , if we want to start from a little before the 2000s let's start in 200 ad. well, tony , yes , he had a milder approach towards the zionists, he did not criticize israel much. he is a jew himself , although he himself is a jew, he makes soft criticisms, declares his opposition to settlements , and after that, jeremy corbyn, when he came to power well , there will be a challenging period between the labor party and the zionists. he openly criticizes and speaks in support of the rights of the palestinians, which causes challenges . he was the head of the labor party from 2015 to 2020. and in the end, mr. starmer comes to stigmatize, or better to say

, he suspends him from the party under the political pretext of something and takes his place. but he also raises subtle criticisms based on the fact that settlement construction is stopped and also emphasized on fire it doesn't make any difference, it means that we have the right cynic roots, that the conservatives are themselves allies of tel aviv

, always showing many services during the post-war period. international as well as intelligence and espionage assistance. but if we want to have a look into the future, the fact is that the labor party of the new prime minister starmer will continue to support the survival of the zionists under the pretext of legitimately defending their criminal actions in the gaza strip and in rafah. will confirm but will still insist on a few principles a non-proliferation and termination. to the conflict and tension and the war in gaza, now to the pretexts of human rights and also preventing support for the formation of two

governments in the occupied territories and reducing or preventing the discussion of zionist settlements. my understanding of this part of your speech is that in the strategy these two prime ministers do not make a difference in supporting the zionist regime, but it is possible that the prime minister who has been elected will be more moderate in the way of qadi, and now we are witnessing it. let's say that maybe now, even under the pretext of this change in the british government, the west will go to that end this war, i still want to continue talking to you, but the report about the first demonstration after the election was actually held in england and the british people's desire to see support for gaza goes back to the conversation with mr. jalalzadeh. we went

there are no new justifications for this. we do not want our money to be used to provide weapons for the genocide of palestinians. labor party because of its support for the zionist regime since the beginning of the gaza war and also the expulsion.

in order to stop the genocide of palestinians and to punish the war criminals in gaza, we started only with a cease-fire in this area and the realization of the rights of the palestinians. will do we want to convey the message that we the people are not complicit in this genocide and the change of governments cannot make us stand on the side of criminals. we continue our right path with strength , our most important desire is freedom. the issue of palestine and the gaza crisis, which was not ineffective in overthrowing the previous british government led by the conservative party, can now

challenge the new british government led by the labor party. i will continue the conversation with mr. seyed mojtabi jalalzadeh, an expert on international issues in the world today . mr. jalalzadeh, you heard my colleague's summary. he believed that it is possible that this issue of palestine and the wide impact it had on the public opinion of the world had an effect on the conservatives losing this election and the labor party winning . what is your opinion on this matter? we read consider immigration and internal british politics as the reason for the defeat of the conservatives and predict the victory of the labor party based on that, but the fact is that based on field observations, the gaza issue has been a very important issue in england, because on the one hand, the muslims living in england are asian. descents

and also our ordinary citizens now during. last month, when the al-aqsa storm took place, the events after that saw a wave of anti-zionism in the world and the support and subsequent support for the rights of the oppressed palestinian people. well, england and london were not exempt from this story and from this rule, and in the report we also saw pictures of it. the fact is that according to field observations and surveys, 20% of the reason why muslims and asia. british descendants don't vote for the conservatives, the issue of gaza is the fact that the intellectuals and ordinary people now, through the media and the fact that a genocide and a heinous crime against the zionists happened in the occupied territories has become sensitive and caused the support of the politicians

and the support of the governments to support israel with huge costs in the international arena. mr. jarzadeh , let's go to ukraine first. on his first day of work, the new british minister had a call with the president of ukraine and announced his support for onor . we heard in the news that moscow expressed his disappointment that the relations between moscow and london would improve. you know, see, the reality is that based on different parameters, we won't see much difference and change in london-moscow relations in the future, because in the cold post-war mental atmosphere that dominates english politicians , and in addition to the special and trans-atlantic relations they defined with the united states of america. russia

as an international threat, and in other words as an enemy, since the beginning of the ukraine war, almost the british policy has been the same until today and will continue to be the same from now on . under the title of threat, threat to security between the international community should accuse the russians of flagrant violation of international law, and at the same time give weapons to the ukrainians to blow. in the fire of war , he is strongly following the proposition that mr. starmer has been emphasizing these days, which is to negotiate through dialogue, or rather, through diplomacy, to war. end it, but the fact is that england will go along with the sanctions that the european union or the sanctions that the west , led by the united states

, will impose against russia due to the war in ukraine, and we will not see much change in this policy, considering that every now the problem ukraine is supported by several western countries, and on the other hand, usually when the prime ministers or presidents are willing to close the case, if we see in the literature of the western political authorities , there is a desire to close the case , how much can england be an actor alone? in order for this case to be closed now without the responsibility of ukraine, you said that there is no hope for moscow-voldan relations to improve, but can we hope that the new british prime minister will close the case and how much he can be an actor? yes, see, they will definitely try. did and what mr. starmer emphasized in his speech

is diplomacy and dialogue, as i mentioned , to end the war in ukraine, now according to the authors who raise human rights debates , it is a question of helping ukrainian refugees, but the reality of the matter is that he will continue it. this is what we do if we look at the matter from a realistic point of view. let's say that the land of ukraine is the meeting point of east and west, that is , what we are witnessing today is the support of the west , the support of the western bloc, america, france, germany, england, for ukraine, not for ukraine's victory, not for ukraine itself, and to reach now the lands that were lost it is given, but it is to contain russia, which is a war of prestige.

make them stop russia's advance and simultaneously bring russia to the point of analysis economically and militarily. this is ukraine's playground. let's go to one of the plans that mr. starmer came up with on his first day of work. he has stopped the deportation of refugees from rwanda . the plan that was proposed in different terms of the british prime ministers has been proposed since the time of mr. boris johnson until now.

at the beginning of his coming to power, starmer took this action. well, look at the issue of asylum seekers, or even beyond that, that is, the circle, if we make it harder, in the analysis of the issue of extraterritorial immigrants in britain, it is one of the most important issues. this was one of the issues that led to the formation of brexit 8 years ago and the separation of england from the european union. during the time that england was a member of the european union, we witnessed that it never entered the schengen area and was allowed to travel and leave. the arrival of free europeans did not turn europeans towards their own country, it is a very important issue for the english from several different perspectives to this we mentioned that during several terms of the prime minister , this issue was brought up until finally , in july

of last year, if i am not mistaken, the transfer of asylum seekers to a third country was approved and became a law. so far, the british have spent 270 million pounds. paying to rwanda and only being able to take two asylum seekers, they also paid 3 thousand dollars and 3 thousand pounds to themselves and sending them until this policy failed. why was this policy wrong and could not be done? there are several reasons why mr. rishisunai tried very hard do it to him and one of me will always open this too in parentheses, the issues of asylum seekers and their treatment and limiting the illegal entry of asylum seekers into british lands has been one of the electoral challenges of the parties during these years , but there are three main reasons that we can consider for this plan. he did not succeed with it , and mr. starmer suspended this work as his first promise

. there is a debate about the ineffectiveness and lack of deterrence of this issue. well, this plan has been proposed and approved, but we may still be sending our petitioners to the land by boat. the british arrive at the next cost debate above, i said that several million pounds were paid and now it is supposed to be paid in 50 million pounds packages, but it has not been received and most importantly, it is against international laws. well, england is a member of two conventions. that these policies of his are in conflict with these laws of the conventions and is there an attempt to make themselves popular in the public opinion, that stopping this deportation plan can be effective in the popularity and favor of the public opinion towards them. to

the increase of asylum seekers. those who are in england and legally have citizenship, i said again, in the gaza issue, we have seen to some extent that the discussion of asians and muslims can have a positive result on a small percentage of public opinion inside , but mostly it is an international gesture of international rights that they want to take for their own purposes and for their own principles. sepehr international relations let's not forget that another opponent of asylum seekers and asylum seekers is mr. macron, the president of france, who was the first person to call mr. starmer and congratulate him on his victory, and even in this they talk about the issue and this is the reality it is true that the strict british policies will become even stricter in the future, although the rwanda case will be closed. let's go to one of the internal challenges of the uk, which is the issue of health and services.

very influential, which caused both the defeat of the conservatives and the victory of the labor party, is the field of health and public health. there is health and public health . health and public health is one of the areas that the people and citizens of britain are involved with . the high costs that are depriving many of these services. there is a lack of manpower. has this put you next to the other parameters that i mentioned in the last 20 and 14 years of the conservatives with

him. being involved in the discussion of price increases, now the rise of inflation, the widespread poverty that exists in the british society, this is not about me and the current iranian data , it is about the big debates that are raised in the media itself. europe is brought up and criticisms are formed. the fact is that a part of the british people who benefit less from the health system has been removed and this has caused it. form a basic challenge. well, starmer came and with this door the strengthened conservatives means that this challenge and this crisis increased. yes, due to the wrong policies of mismanagement, which increased this gap and this deprivation was strengthened. well, one of the points that he had in his propaganda slogans and in his big slogan was the issue of change. sir, i have come to change the policies, under which he

has promised to pay for public health and health, that in the future, it should be reformed, and i will be able to establish the issues that exist. as a final question, i would like to ask. talking about the palestine issue, which is one of the priorities of the west asian issue in the intellectual view of mr. starmer and now the conservative party , what is distinctive about iran, the debate between the west and asia, is there a special position regarding iran?